1
|
Tzeis S, Gerstenfeld EP, Kalman J, Saad EB, Shamloo AS, Andrade JG, Barbhaiya CR, Baykaner T, Boveda S, Calkins H, Chan NY, Chen M, Chen SA, Dagres N, Damiano RJ, De Potter T, Deisenhofer I, Derval N, Di Biase L, Duytschaever M, Dyrda K, Hindricks G, Hocini M, Kim YH, la Meir M, Merino JL, Michaud GF, Natale A, Nault I, Nava S, Nitta T, O'Neill M, Pak HN, Piccini JP, Pürerfellner H, Reichlin T, Saenz LC, Sanders P, Schilling R, Schmidt B, Supple GE, Thomas KL, Tondo C, Verma A, Wan EY. 2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm 2024; 21:e31-e149. [PMID: 38597857 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stylianos Tzeis
- Department of Cardiology, Mitera Hospital, 6, Erythrou Stavrou Str., Marousi, Athens, PC 151 23, Greece.
| | - Edward P Gerstenfeld
- Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan Kalman
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne and Baker Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Eduardo B Saad
- Electrophysiology and Pacing, Hospital Samaritano Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Jason G Andrade
- Department of Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Tina Baykaner
- Division of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Serge Boveda
- Heart Rhythm Management Department, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France; Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hugh Calkins
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ngai-Yin Chan
- Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Minglong Chen
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Shih-Ann Chen
- Heart Rhythm Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, and Cardiovascular Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | | | - Ralph J Damiano
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Isabel Deisenhofer
- Department of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich (TUM) School of Medicine and Health, Munich, Germany
| | - Nicolas Derval
- IHU LIRYC, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Cardiac Electrophysiology and Stimulation Department, Fondation Bordeaux Université and Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Pessac-Bordeaux, France
| | - Luigi Di Biase
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | - Katia Dyrda
- Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Meleze Hocini
- IHU LIRYC, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Cardiac Electrophysiology and Stimulation Department, Fondation Bordeaux Université and Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Pessac-Bordeaux, France
| | - Young-Hoon Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Korea University College of Medicine and Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Mark la Meir
- Cardiac Surgery Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jose Luis Merino
- La Paz University Hospital, Idipaz, Universidad Autonoma, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Viamed Santa Elena, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Andrea Natale
- Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David's Medical Center, Austin, TX, USA; Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA; Interventional Electrophysiology, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, CA, USA; Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Division of Cardiology, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Isabelle Nault
- Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Quebec (IUCPQ), Quebec, Canada
| | - Santiago Nava
- Departamento de Electrocardiología, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología 'Ignacio Chávez', Ciudad de México, México
| | - Takashi Nitta
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mark O'Neill
- Cardiovascular Directorate, St. Thomas' Hospital and King's College, London, UK
| | - Hui-Nam Pak
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | - Tobias Reichlin
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital Bern, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Luis Carlos Saenz
- International Arrhythmia Center, Cardioinfantil Foundation, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Prashanthan Sanders
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Boris Schmidt
- Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Medizinische Klinik III, Agaplesion Markuskrankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Gregory E Supple
- Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Claudio Tondo
- Department of Clinical Electrophysiology and Cardiac Pacing, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Atul Verma
- McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Elaine Y Wan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zylla MM, Imberti JF, Leyva F, Casado-Arroyo R, Braunschweig F, Pürerfellner H, Merino JL, Boriani G. Same-day discharge vs. overnight stay following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis by the European Heart Rhythm Association Health Economics Committee. Europace 2024; 26:euae200. [PMID: 39077807 PMCID: PMC11321359 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2024] [Accepted: 07/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024] Open
Abstract
AIMS Same-day discharge (SDD) after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) may address the growing socio-economic health burden of the increasing demand for interventional AF therapies. This systematic review and meta-analysis analyses the current evidence on clinical outcomes in SDD after AF ablation compared with overnight stay (ONS). METHODS AND RESULTS A systematic search of the PubMed database was performed. Pre-defined endpoints were complications at short-term (24-96 h) and 30-day post-discharge, re-hospitalization, and/or emergency room (ER) visits at 30-day post-discharge, and 30-day mortality. Twenty-four studies (154 716 patients) were included. Random-effects models were applied for meta-analyses of pooled endpoint prevalence in the SDD cohort and for comparison between SDD and ONS cohorts. Pooled estimates for complications after SDD were low both for short-term [2%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1-5%; I2: 89%) and 30-day follow-up (2%; 95% CI: 1-4%; I2: 91%). There was no significant difference in complications rates between SDD and ONS [short-term: risk ratio (RR): 1.62; 95% CI: 0.52-5.01; I2: 37%; 30 days: RR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.42-1.00; I2: 95%). Pooled rates of re-hospitalization/ER visits after SDD were 4% (95% CI: 1-10%; I2: 96%) with no statistically significant difference between SDD and ONS (RR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.58-1.27; I2: 61%). Pooled 30-day mortality was low after SDD (0%; 95% CI: 0-1%; I2: 33%). All studies were subject to a relevant risk of bias, mainly due to study design. CONCLUSION In this meta-analysis including a large contemporary cohort, SDD after AF ablation was associated with low prevalence of post-discharge complications, re-hospitalizations/ER visits and mortality, and a similar risk compared with ONS. Due to limited quality of current evidence, further prospective, randomized trials are needed to confirm safety of SDD and define patient- and procedure-related prerequisites for successful and safe SDD strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maura M Zylla
- Department of Cardiology, Heidelberg Center of Heart Rhythm Disorders, Medical University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, Heidelberg, Germany
- Health Economics Committee of EHRA (European Heart Rhythm Association)
| | - Jacopo F Imberti
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Via del Pozzo 71, 41121 Modena, Italy
- Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Francisco Leyva
- Health Economics Committee of EHRA (European Heart Rhythm Association)
- Aston Medical Research Institute, Aston Medical School, Aston University, Aston Triangle, B4 7ET Birmingham, UK
| | - Ruben Casado-Arroyo
- Health Economics Committee of EHRA (European Heart Rhythm Association)
- Department of Cardiology, H.U.B. Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Frieder Braunschweig
- Health Economics Committee of EHRA (European Heart Rhythm Association)
- Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet
- ME Cardiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Norrbacka S1:02, Eugeniavagen 27, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Helmut Pürerfellner
- Department of Cardiology, Public Hospital Elisabethinen, Academic Teaching Hospital, Ordensklinikum A-4020 Linz, Fadingerstraße 1, Austria
| | - José L Merino
- Arrhythmia-Robotic Electrophysiology Unit, La Paz University Hospital, IdiPAZ, Universidad Autonoma, Madrid, Spain
| | - Giuseppe Boriani
- Health Economics Committee of EHRA (European Heart Rhythm Association)
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Via del Pozzo 71, 41121 Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zenger B, Torre M, Zhang Y, Boo L, Jamshidian F, Young J, Bunch TJ, Steinberg BA. Comprehensive analysis of same day discharge after atrial fibrillation ablation: Clinical, cost, and patient reported outcomes. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2024; 35:1570-1578. [PMID: 38837730 DOI: 10.1111/jce.16331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Revised: 05/03/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Same day discharge (SDD) following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedure has emerged as routine practice, and primarily driven by operator discretion. However, the impacts of SDD on clinical outcomes, healthcare system costs, and patient reported outcomes (PROs) have not been systematically studied. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing routine AF ablation procedures with SDD versus overnight observation (NSDD). After propensity adjustment we compared postprocedure adverse events (AEs), healthcare system costs, and changes in PROs. RESULTS We identified 310 cases, with 159 undergoing SDD and 151 staying at least one midnight in the hospital (NSDD). Compared with NSDD, SDD patients were similar age (mean 64 vs. 66, p = 0.3), sex (26% female vs. 27%, p = 0.8), and with lower mean CHADS2-VA2Sc scores (2.0 vs. 2.7; p < 0.011). The primary outcome of AEs was noninferior in SDD versus NSDD patients (odds ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.21-0.99; noninferiority margin of 10%). There were also no differences in overall cost to the healthcare system between SDD and NSDD (p = 0.11). PROs numerically favored SDD (p = NS for all scores). CONCLUSIONS Physician selection for SDD appears at least as safe as NSDD with respect to clinical outcomes and SDD is not significantly less costly to the health system. There is a trend towards more favorable, general PROs among SDD patients. Routine SDD should be strongly considered for patients undergoing routine AF ablation procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Zenger
- Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Michael Torre
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Yue Zhang
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Leeming Boo
- Biosense Webster Inc., Irvine, California, USA
| | | | - Jeff Young
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Thomas J Bunch
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tzeis S, Gerstenfeld EP, Kalman J, Saad E, Shamloo AS, Andrade JG, Barbhaiya CR, Baykaner T, Boveda S, Calkins H, Chan NY, Chen M, Chen SA, Dagres N, Damiano RJ, De Potter T, Deisenhofer I, Derval N, Di Biase L, Duytschaever M, Dyrda K, Hindricks G, Hocini M, Kim YH, la Meir M, Merino JL, Michaud GF, Natale A, Nault I, Nava S, Nitta T, O'Neill M, Pak HN, Piccini JP, Pürerfellner H, Reichlin T, Saenz LC, Sanders P, Schilling R, Schmidt B, Supple GE, Thomas KL, Tondo C, Verma A, Wan EY. 2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2024; 67:921-1072. [PMID: 38609733 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-024-01771-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Edward P Gerstenfeld
- Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan Kalman
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne and Baker Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Eduardo Saad
- Electrophysiology and Pacing, Hospital Samaritano Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Jason G Andrade
- Department of Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Tina Baykaner
- Division of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Serge Boveda
- Heart Rhythm Management Department, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
- Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hugh Calkins
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ngai-Yin Chan
- Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Minglong Chen
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Shih-Ann Chen
- Heart Rhythm Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Nikolaos Dagres
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Charité University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ralph J Damiano
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Isabel Deisenhofer
- Department of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich (TUM) School of Medicine and Health, Munich, Germany
| | - Nicolas Derval
- IHU LIRYC, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Cardiac Electrophysiology and Stimulation Department, Fondation Bordeaux Université and Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Pessac-Bordeaux, France
| | - Luigi Di Biase
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | - Katia Dyrda
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Gerhard Hindricks
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Charité University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Meleze Hocini
- IHU LIRYC, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Cardiac Electrophysiology and Stimulation Department, Fondation Bordeaux Université and Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Pessac-Bordeaux, France
| | - Young-Hoon Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Korea University College of Medicine and Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Mark la Meir
- Cardiac Surgery Department, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jose Luis Merino
- La Paz University Hospital, Idipaz, Universidad Autonoma, Madrid, Spain
- Hospital Viamed Santa Elena, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gregory F Michaud
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrea Natale
- Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David's Medical Center, Austin, TX, USA
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Interventional Electrophysiology, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, CA, USA
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Division of Cardiology, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Isabelle Nault
- Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Quebec (IUCPQ), Quebec, Canada
| | - Santiago Nava
- Departamento de Electrocardiología, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología 'Ignacio Chávez', Ciudad de México, México
| | - Takashi Nitta
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mark O'Neill
- Cardiovascular Directorate, St. Thomas' Hospital and King's College, London, UK
| | - Hui-Nam Pak
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | - Tobias Reichlin
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital Bern, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Luis Carlos Saenz
- International Arrhythmia Center, Cardioinfantil Foundation, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Prashanthan Sanders
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Boris Schmidt
- Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Medizinische Klinik III, Agaplesion Markuskrankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Gregory E Supple
- Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Claudio Tondo
- Department of Clinical Electrophysiology and Cardiac Pacing, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Atul Verma
- McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Elaine Y Wan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zagrodzky W, Cooper J, Joseph C, Sackett M, Silva J, Kuk R, McHugh J, Brumback B, Park S, Hayward R, Taneja T, Vu A, Liu T, Kulstad E, Kaplan A, Ramireddy A, Omotoye S. Association between proactive esophageal cooling and increased lab throughput. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2024; 35:1150-1155. [PMID: 38566579 DOI: 10.1111/jce.16263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Proactive esophageal cooling has been FDA cleared to reduce the likelihood of ablation-related esophageal injury resulting from radiofrequency (RF) cardiac ablation procedures. Data suggest that procedure times for RF pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) also decrease when proactive esophageal cooling is employed instead of luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring. Reduced procedure times may allow increased electrophysiology (EP) lab throughput. We aimed to quantify the change in EP lab throughput of PVI cases after the introduction of proactive esophageal cooling. METHODS EP lab throughput data were obtained from three EP groups. We then compared EP lab throughput over equal time frames at each site before (pre-adoption) and after (post-adoption) the adoption of proactive esophageal cooling. RESULTS Over the time frame of the study, a total of 2498 PVIs were performed over a combined 74 months, with cooling adopted in September 2021, November 2021, and March 2022 at each respective site. In the pre-adoption time frame, 1026 PVIs were performed using a combination of LET monitoring with the addition of esophageal deviation when deemed necessary by the operator. In the post-adoption time frame, 1472 PVIs were performed using exclusively proactive esophageal cooling, representing a mean 43% increase in throughput (p < .0001), despite the loss of two operators during the post-adoption time frame. CONCLUSION Adoption of proactive esophageal cooling during PVI ablation procedures is associated with a significant increase in EP lab throughput, even after a reduction in total number of operating physicians in the post-adoption group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Julie Cooper
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | | | - Matthew Sackett
- Centra Health, Centra Lynchburg General Hospital and Centra Specialty Hospital, Lynchburg, Virginia, USA
| | - Jose Silva
- Centra Health, Centra Lynchburg General Hospital and Centra Specialty Hospital, Lynchburg, Virginia, USA
| | - Richard Kuk
- Centra Health, Centra Lynchburg General Hospital and Centra Specialty Hospital, Lynchburg, Virginia, USA
| | - Julia McHugh
- Centra Health, Centra Lynchburg General Hospital and Centra Specialty Hospital, Lynchburg, Virginia, USA
| | - Babette Brumback
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Shirley Park
- Kaiser Permanente, Santa Clara Medical Center, Santa Clara, California, USA
| | - Robert Hayward
- Kaiser Permanente, Santa Clara Medical Center, Santa Clara, California, USA
| | - Taresh Taneja
- Kaiser Permanente, Santa Clara Medical Center, Santa Clara, California, USA
| | - Andrew Vu
- Kaiser Permanente, Santa Clara Medical Center, Santa Clara, California, USA
| | - Taylor Liu
- Kaiser Permanente, Santa Clara Medical Center, Santa Clara, California, USA
| | - Erik Kulstad
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Palmieri V, Yijin X, Fischbach P, Whitehill R. Safety of same-day discharge without anticoagulation for left-sided radiofrequency catheter ablations in pediatrics. Heart Rhythm 2024; 21:592-599. [PMID: 38215810 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For left-sided radiofrequency catheter ablation (LCA) in pediatrics, significant practice variability exists regarding anticoagulation and discharge practices. Given the lack of data in pediatric patients, the risks and benefits of these practices are not well defined. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of same-day discharge and use of aspirin (ASA) in pediatric patients following LCA. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients who underwent LCA from 2010 to 2020 at our institution. Discharge timing and ASA usage were based on operator preference. The primary outcome was incidence of postablation anticoagulation complications reported within 1 month of the procedure. RESULTS Three hundred seventy-six patients underwent LCA and met inclusion criteria. Median [25th, 75th percentiles] age was 13.9 [10.5, 16.2] years; 18 (4.7%) had a history of structural heart disease. The most common substrates for ablation were Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (183 patients [48.7%]), concealed accessory pathway (159 patients [42.3%]), and ectopic atrial tachycardia (10 patients [2.7%]). Three hundred thirty-eight patients (89.9%) were discharged on the day of LCA. Seventy-six patients (20.2%) were prescribed ASA at discharge. Of those who underwent follow-up (273 patients [72.6%]), 7 (2.7%) reported an anticoagulation complication (5 with hematoma, 2 with headache). One of these patients was prescribed ASA; none required readmission. There was no correlation between anticoagulation complications and same-day discharge or with ASA usage. CONCLUSION Given the rare incidence of anticoagulation complications in pediatric patients undergoing LCAs, same-day discharge from the electrophysiology laboratory without anticoagulation should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Palmieri
- Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Cardiology, Atlanta, Georgia; Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
| | - Xiang Yijin
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Peter Fischbach
- Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Cardiology, Atlanta, Georgia; Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Robert Whitehill
- Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Cardiology, Atlanta, Georgia; Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tzeis S, Gerstenfeld EP, Kalman J, Saad EB, Sepehri Shamloo A, Andrade JG, Barbhaiya CR, Baykaner T, Boveda S, Calkins H, Chan NY, Chen M, Chen SA, Dagres N, Damiano RJ, De Potter T, Deisenhofer I, Derval N, Di Biase L, Duytschaever M, Dyrda K, Hindricks G, Hocini M, Kim YH, la Meir M, Merino JL, Michaud GF, Natale A, Nault I, Nava S, Nitta T, O’Neill M, Pak HN, Piccini JP, Pürerfellner H, Reichlin T, Saenz LC, Sanders P, Schilling R, Schmidt B, Supple GE, Thomas KL, Tondo C, Verma A, Wan EY. 2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace 2024; 26:euae043. [PMID: 38587017 PMCID: PMC11000153 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stylianos Tzeis
- Department of Cardiology, Mitera Hospital, 6, Erythrou Stavrou Str., Marousi, Athens, PC 151 23, Greece
| | - Edward P Gerstenfeld
- Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan Kalman
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne and Baker Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Eduardo B Saad
- Electrophysiology and Pacing, Hospital Samaritano Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Jason G Andrade
- Department of Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Tina Baykaner
- Division of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Serge Boveda
- Heart Rhythm Management Department, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
- Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hugh Calkins
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ngai-Yin Chan
- Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Minglong Chen
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Shih-Ann Chen
- Heart Rhythm Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, and Cardiovascular Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | | | - Ralph J Damiano
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Isabel Deisenhofer
- Department of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich (TUM) School of Medicine and Health, Munich, Germany
| | - Nicolas Derval
- IHU LIRYC, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Cardiac Electrophysiology and Stimulation Department, Fondation Bordeaux Université and Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Pessac-Bordeaux, France
| | - Luigi Di Biase
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | - Katia Dyrda
- Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Meleze Hocini
- IHU LIRYC, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Cardiac Electrophysiology and Stimulation Department, Fondation Bordeaux Université and Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Pessac-Bordeaux, France
| | - Young-Hoon Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Korea University College of Medicine and Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Mark la Meir
- Cardiac Surgery Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jose Luis Merino
- La Paz University Hospital, Idipaz, Universidad Autonoma, Madrid, Spain
- Hospital Viamed Santa Elena, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Andrea Natale
- Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David’s Medical Center, Austin, TX, USA
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Interventional Electrophysiology, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, CA, USA
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Division of Cardiology, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Isabelle Nault
- Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Quebec (IUCPQ), Quebec, Canada
| | - Santiago Nava
- Departamento de Electrocardiología, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología ‘Ignacio Chávez’, Ciudad de México, México
| | - Takashi Nitta
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mark O’Neill
- Cardiovascular Directorate, St. Thomas’ Hospital and King’s College, London, UK
| | - Hui-Nam Pak
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | - Tobias Reichlin
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital Bern, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Luis Carlos Saenz
- International Arrhythmia Center, Cardioinfantil Foundation, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Prashanthan Sanders
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Boris Schmidt
- Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Medizinische Klinik III, Agaplesion Markuskrankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Gregory E Supple
- Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Claudio Tondo
- Department of Clinical Electrophysiology and Cardiac Pacing, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Atul Verma
- McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Elaine Y Wan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Espinosa T, Farrus A, Venturas M, Cano A, Vazquez-Calvo S, Pujol-Lopez M, Eulogio-Valenzuela F, Guichard JB, Falzone PV, Graterol FR, Freixa X, Tolosana JM, Guasch E, Porta-Sanchez A, Arbelo E, Brugada J, Sitges M, Mont L, Roca-Luque I, Althoff TF. Same-day discharge after atrial fibrillation ablation under a nurse-coordinated standardized protocol. Europace 2024; 26:euae083. [PMID: 38571291 PMCID: PMC11020282 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
AIMS Same-day discharge (SDD) after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is an effective means to spare healthcare resources. However, safety remains a concern, and besides structural adaptations, SDD requires more efficient logistics and coordination. Therefore, in this study, we implement a streamlined, nurse-coordinated SDD programme following a standardized protocol. METHODS AND RESULTS As a dedicated SDD coordinator, a nurse specialized in ambulatory cardiac interventions was in charge of the full SDD protocol, including eligibility, patient flow, in-hospital logistics, patient education, and discharge as well as early post-discharge follow-up by smartphone-based virtual visits. Patients planned for AF ablation were considered eligible if they had a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥35%, with basic support at home and accessibility of the hospital within 60 min also forming a part of the eligibility criteria. A total of 420 consecutive patients were screened by the SDD coordinator, of whom 331 were eligible for SDD. The reasons for exclusion were living remotely (29, 6.9%), lack of support at home (19, 4.5%), or LVEF <35% (17, 4.0%). Of the eligible patients, 300 (91%) were successfully discharged the same day. There were no major post-SDD complications. Rates of unplanned medical attention (19, 6.3%) and 30-day readmission (5, 1.6%) were extremely low and driven by femoral access-site complications. These were significantly reduced upon the introduction of compulsory ultrasound-guided punctures after the initial 150 SDD patients (P = 0.0145). Standardized SDD coordination resulted in efficient workflows and reduced the total workload of the medical staff. CONCLUSION Same-day discharge after AF ablation following a nurse-coordinated standardized protocol is safe and efficient. The concept of ambulatory cardiac intervention nurses functioning as dedicated coordinators may be key in the future transition of hospitals to SDD. Ultrasound-guided femoral puncture virtually eliminated relevant femoral access-site complications in our cohort and should therefore be a prerequisite for SDD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Espinosa
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute (ICCV), CLÍNIC—Barcelona University Hospital, Carrer Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Anna Farrus
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute (ICCV), CLÍNIC—Barcelona University Hospital, Carrer Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Montserrat Venturas
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute (ICCV), CLÍNIC—Barcelona University Hospital, Carrer Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Alba Cano
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute (ICCV), CLÍNIC—Barcelona University Hospital, Carrer Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Sara Vazquez-Calvo
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute (ICCV), CLÍNIC—Barcelona University Hospital, Carrer Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Department of Arrhythmia Research, C/del Rosselló, 149, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Margarida Pujol-Lopez
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute (ICCV), CLÍNIC—Barcelona University Hospital, Carrer Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Department of Arrhythmia Research, C/del Rosselló, 149, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Frida Eulogio-Valenzuela
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute (ICCV), CLÍNIC—Barcelona University Hospital, Carrer Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Department of Arrhythmia Research, C/del Rosselló, 149, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Jean-Baptiste Guichard
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute (ICCV), CLÍNIC—Barcelona University Hospital, Carrer Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Department of Arrhythmia Research, C/del Rosselló, 149, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Pasquale V Falzone
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute (ICCV), CLÍNIC—Barcelona University Hospital, Carrer Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Department of Arrhythmia Research, C/del Rosselló, 149, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Freddy R Graterol
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute (ICCV), CLÍNIC—Barcelona University Hospital, Carrer Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Department of Arrhythmia Research, C/del Rosselló, 149, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Xavier Freixa
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute (ICCV), CLÍNIC—Barcelona University Hospital, Carrer Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Department of Arrhythmia Research, C/del Rosselló, 149, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Jose M Tolosana
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute (ICCV), CLÍNIC—Barcelona University Hospital, Carrer Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Department of Arrhythmia Research, C/del Rosselló, 149, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red, Cardiovascular Diseases (CIBERCV), Av. Monforte de Lemos, 3-5, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Eduard Guasch
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute (ICCV), CLÍNIC—Barcelona University Hospital, Carrer Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Department of Arrhythmia Research, C/del Rosselló, 149, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red, Cardiovascular Diseases (CIBERCV), Av. Monforte de Lemos, 3-5, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Andreu Porta-Sanchez
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute (ICCV), CLÍNIC—Barcelona University Hospital, Carrer Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Department of Arrhythmia Research, C/del Rosselló, 149, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red, Cardiovascular Diseases (CIBERCV), Av. Monforte de Lemos, 3-5, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena Arbelo
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute (ICCV), CLÍNIC—Barcelona University Hospital, Carrer Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Department of Arrhythmia Research, C/del Rosselló, 149, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red, Cardiovascular Diseases (CIBERCV), Av. Monforte de Lemos, 3-5, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Josep Brugada
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute (ICCV), CLÍNIC—Barcelona University Hospital, Carrer Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Department of Arrhythmia Research, C/del Rosselló, 149, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Marta Sitges
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute (ICCV), CLÍNIC—Barcelona University Hospital, Carrer Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Department of Arrhythmia Research, C/del Rosselló, 149, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red, Cardiovascular Diseases (CIBERCV), Av. Monforte de Lemos, 3-5, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Lluis Mont
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute (ICCV), CLÍNIC—Barcelona University Hospital, Carrer Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Department of Arrhythmia Research, C/del Rosselló, 149, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red, Cardiovascular Diseases (CIBERCV), Av. Monforte de Lemos, 3-5, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Ivo Roca-Luque
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute (ICCV), CLÍNIC—Barcelona University Hospital, Carrer Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Department of Arrhythmia Research, C/del Rosselló, 149, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red, Cardiovascular Diseases (CIBERCV), Av. Monforte de Lemos, 3-5, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Till F Althoff
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute (ICCV), CLÍNIC—Barcelona University Hospital, Carrer Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Department of Arrhythmia Research, C/del Rosselló, 149, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Honarbakhsh S, Martin CA, Mesquita J, Herlekar R, Till R, Srinivasan NT, Duncan E, Leong F, Dulai R, Veasey R, Panikker S, Paisey J, Ramgopal B, Das M, Ahmed W, Sahu J, Earley MJ, Finlay MC, Schilling RJ, Hunter RJ. Atrial fibrillation cryoablation is an effective day case treatment: the UK PolarX vs. Arctic Front Advance experience. Europace 2023; 25:euad286. [PMID: 37738643 PMCID: PMC10629714 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euad286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). There are limited data on the PolarX Cryoballoon. The study aimed to establish the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of same day discharge for Cryoballoon PVI. METHODS AND RESULTS Multi-centre study across 12 centres. Procedural metrics, safety profile, and procedural efficacy of the PolarX Cryoballoon with the Arctic Front Advance (AFA) Cryoballoon were compared in a cohort large enough to provide definitive comparative data. A total of 1688 patients underwent PVI with cryoablation (50% PolarX and 50% AFA). Successful PVI was achieved with 1677 (99.3%) patients with 97.2% (n = 1641) performed as day case procedures with a complication rate of <1%. Safety, procedural metrics, and efficacy of the PolarX Cryoballoon were comparable with the AFA cohort. The PolarX Cryoballoon demonstrated a nadir temperature of -54.6 ± 7.6°C, temperature at 30 s of -38.6 ± 7.2°C, time to -40°C of 34.1 ± 13.7 s, and time to isolation of 49.8 ± 33.2 s. Independent predictors for achieving PVI included time to reach -40°C [odds ratio (OR) 1.34; P < 0.001] and nadir temperature (OR 1.24; P < 0.001) with an optimal cut-off of ≤34 s [area under the curve (AUC) 0.73; P < 0.001] and nadir temperature of ≤-54.0°C (AUC 0.71; P < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS This large-scale UK multi-centre study has shown that Cryoballoon PVI is a safe, effective day case procedure. PVI using the PolarX Cryoballoon was similarly safe and effective as the AFA Cryoballoon. The cryoablation metrics achieved with the PolarX Cryoballoon were different to that reported with the AFA Cryoballoon. Modified cryoablation targets are required when utilizing the PolarX Cryoballoon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shohreh Honarbakhsh
- The Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Barts Health NHS trust, W Smithfield, EC1A 7BE London, UK
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Claire A Martin
- Department of Electrophysiology, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Joao Mesquita
- Department of Electrophysiology, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Rahul Herlekar
- Department of Electrophysiology, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Richard Till
- Department of Electrophysiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | - Neil T Srinivasan
- Department of Electrophysiology, Basildon and Thurrock University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Essex, UK
| | - Edward Duncan
- Department of Electrophysiology, The University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Fong Leong
- Department of Electrophysiology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - Rajdip Dulai
- Department of Electrophysiology, Eastbourne District General Hospital, East Sussex Healthcare NHS trust, Eastbourne, UK
| | - Rick Veasey
- Department of Electrophysiology, Eastbourne District General Hospital, East Sussex Healthcare NHS trust, Eastbourne, UK
| | - Sandeep Panikker
- Department of Electrophysiology, University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK
| | - John Paisey
- Department of Electrophysiology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Balasubramanian Ramgopal
- Department of Electrophysiology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Moloy Das
- Department of Electrophysiology, Freeman Hospital, The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | - Wissam Ahmed
- Department of Electrophysiology, Freeman Hospital, The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | - Jonathan Sahu
- Department of Electrophysiology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Mark J Earley
- The Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Barts Health NHS trust, W Smithfield, EC1A 7BE London, UK
- Department of Electrophysiology, OneWellbeck, 1 Wellbeck Street, W1G 0AR London, UK
| | - Malcolm C Finlay
- The Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Barts Health NHS trust, W Smithfield, EC1A 7BE London, UK
| | - Richard J Schilling
- The Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Barts Health NHS trust, W Smithfield, EC1A 7BE London, UK
- Department of Electrophysiology, OneWellbeck, 1 Wellbeck Street, W1G 0AR London, UK
| | - Ross J Hunter
- The Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Barts Health NHS trust, W Smithfield, EC1A 7BE London, UK
- Department of Electrophysiology, OneWellbeck, 1 Wellbeck Street, W1G 0AR London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sangrigoli R, Harding J, Venkataraman G, Tomaiko-Clark E, Bai R, Su W. Randomized prospective evaluation of same-day discharge after cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation: results of the EASY PVI study. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2023; 66:1601-1607. [PMID: 36604354 PMCID: PMC9816011 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-022-01465-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With advancements in technology and ablation techniques, catheter ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become safer with time. In the past, standard-of-care recommended overnight stay for outpatient procedures. As safety has improved and procedure times have shortened, some centers have allowed for same-day discharge. We report the results of a multi-center, randomized clinical trial investigating the safety of same-day discharge post-cryoballoon ablation. METHODS Patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with the Medtronic Arctic Advance cryoballoon at 3 US centers. Six hours after the procedure, patients were randomized to either stay overnight or be discharged same day. RESULTS A total of 49 patients were enrolled. Two patients were withdrawn prior to randomization. One patient chose to withdraw after randomization. Of the 22 patients randomized to same-day discharge and the 23 patients randomized the overnight stay, no significant adverse outcomes were reported in either group. Occurrence of adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups. Procedure time and fluoroscopy time did not significantly differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS This is the first randomized trial examining the safety of same-day discharge post-cryoballoon ablation. Based on our results, same-day discharge following cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal AF is a safe option following uncomplicated ablation for PVI. Operators should use their discretion in selecting patients for same-day discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Emrie Tomaiko-Clark
- Banner University Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
- University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
| | - Rong Bai
- Banner University Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Wilber Su
- Banner University Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jimenez-Candil J, Hernandez Hernandez J, Cruz Galban A, Blanco F, Moriñigo JL, Sanchez García M, Oterino A, Sanchez PL. Clinical and economic outcomes of a systematic same-day discharge programme after pulmonary vein isolation: comparison between cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency ablation. Europace 2023; 25:euad265. [PMID: 37669318 PMCID: PMC10498138 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euad265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/07/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS Same-day discharge (SDD) is feasible after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). We aim to compare prospectively cryoballoon (CRYO) vs. radiofrequency (RF) ablation in a systematic SDD programme. METHODS AND RESULTS We prospectively analysed the 617 scheduled PVI performed consecutively at our institution (n = 377 CRYO, n = 240 RF) from 1 April 2019 to 31 December 2022 within a systematic programme of SDD. The feasibility of SDD, the 10-day incidence of urgent/unplanned medical care after discharge (UUC-10), and the cost per procedure due to hospital resource use were studied. The 100 procedures performed during the previous year, in which patients were systematically hospitalized, were used as a control group. Same-day discharge was achieved in 585/617 (95%) procedures, with a significant trend towards a higher monthly SDD rate from 2019 to 2022 (P = 0.03). The frequency of SDD was similar in CRYO (356/377; 94%) vs. RF (229/240; 95%). After SDD, the UUC-10 was 66/585 (11.3%), being similar for CRYO (41/356; 11.5%) and RF (25/229; 10.9%); P = 0.8 (log-rank test). Of these, 10 patients were re-hospitalized, with an identical rate in CRYO-treated (6/356; 1.7%) and RF-treated (4/229; 1.7%) patients and owing to similar causes (4 haematomas, 4 pericarditis, and 2 symptomatic sinus node dysfunction). Same-day discharge was associated with an average savings per procedure of 63% (P < 0.001), but no differences were found between the CRYO and RF (P = 0.8). CONCLUSION In a systematic SDD programme, feasibility (95%, increasing over time), safety (11% UUC-10, 1.7% re-hospitalizations), and savings (63% per procedure) were similar for CRYO and RF ablation procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Jimenez-Candil
- Servicio de Cardiología, IBSAL-Hospital Universitario, Paseo de San Vicente, 58-182, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
- CIBER-CV
- Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Jesus Hernandez Hernandez
- Servicio de Cardiología, IBSAL-Hospital Universitario, Paseo de San Vicente, 58-182, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
| | - Alba Cruz Galban
- Servicio de Cardiología, IBSAL-Hospital Universitario, Paseo de San Vicente, 58-182, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
| | - Fabian Blanco
- Servicio de Cardiología, IBSAL-Hospital Universitario, Paseo de San Vicente, 58-182, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
| | - Jose Luis Moriñigo
- Servicio de Cardiología, IBSAL-Hospital Universitario, Paseo de San Vicente, 58-182, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
- Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Manuel Sanchez García
- Servicio de Cardiología, IBSAL-Hospital Universitario, Paseo de San Vicente, 58-182, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
| | - Armando Oterino
- Servicio de Cardiología, IBSAL-Hospital Universitario, Paseo de San Vicente, 58-182, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
| | - Pedro L Sanchez
- Servicio de Cardiología, IBSAL-Hospital Universitario, Paseo de San Vicente, 58-182, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
- CIBER-CV
- Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rajendra A, Osorio J, Diaz JC, Hoyos C, Rivera E, Matos CD, Costea A, Varley AL, Thorne C, Hoskins M, Goyal S, Oza S, Magnano A, D'Souza B, Silverstein J, Metzl M, Zei PC, Romero JE. Performance of the REAL-AF Same-Day Discharge Protocol in Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2023; 9:1515-1526. [PMID: 37204358 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2023.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Same-day discharge (SDD) after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has been widely adopted. Nevertheless, planned SDD has been performed by using subjective criteria rather than standardized protocols. OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of the previously described SDD protocol in a prospective multicenter study. METHODS Using the REAL-AF (Real-world Experience of Catheter Ablation for the Treatment of Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation) SDD protocol eligibility criteria (stable anticoagulation, no bleeding history, left ventricular ejection fraction >40%, no pulmonary disease, no procedures within 60 days, and body mass index <35 kg/m2), operators prospectively determined whether patients undergoing ablation of AF were candidates for SDD (SDD vs non-SDD groups). Successful SDD was achieved if the patient met the protocol discharge criteria. The primary efficacy endpoint was the success rate of SDD. The primary safety endpoints were readmission rates as well as acute and subacute complications. The secondary endpoints included procedural characteristics and freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias. RESULTS A total of 2,332 patients were included. The REAL-AF SDD protocol identified 1,982 (85%) patients as potential candidates for SDD. The primary efficacy endpoint was achieved in 1,707 (86.1%) patients. The readmission rate for SDD vs non-SDD group was similar (0.8% vs 0.9%; P = 0.924). The SDD group had a lower acute complication rate than the non-SDD group (0.8% vs 2.9%; P < 0.001), and there was no difference in the subacute complication rate between groups (P = 0.513). Freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias was comparable between groups (P = 0.212). CONCLUSIONS In this large, multicenter prospective registry, the use of a standardized protocol showed the safety of SDD after catheter ablation of paroxysmal and persistent AF. (Real-world Experience of Catheter Ablation for the Treatment of Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation [REAL-AF]; NCT04088071).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anil Rajendra
- Arrhythmia Institute at Grandview, Grandview Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Jose Osorio
- Arrhythmia Institute at Grandview, Grandview Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Juan C Diaz
- Cardiac Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Service, Clinica Las Vegas, Medellin, Colombia
| | - Carolina Hoyos
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Estefanía Rivera
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Carlos D Matos
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alexandru Costea
- Heart & Vascular Institute, The Christ Hospital Medical Center, Liberty Township, Ohio, USA
| | - Allyson L Varley
- Heart Rhythm Clinical and Research Solutions, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | | | | | - Sandeep Goyal
- Piedmont Heart Institute Buckhead, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Saumil Oza
- Ascension Medical Group, St. Vincent's Cardiology, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Anthony Magnano
- Ascension Medical Group, St. Vincent's Cardiology, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Benjamin D'Souza
- Penn Heart and Vascular Center Cherry Hill, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Joshua Silverstein
- Electrophysiology Service, AHN Cardiovascular Institute, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mark Metzl
- NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Paul C Zei
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jorge E Romero
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Creta A, Venier S, Tampakis K, Providencia R, Sunny J, Defaye P, Earley MJ, Finlay M, Hunter RJ, Lambiase PD, Papageorgiou N, Schilling RJ, Sporton S, Andrikopoulos G, Deschamps E, Albenque JP, Cardin C, Combes N, Combes S, Vinolas X, Moreno-Weidmann Z, Huang T, Eichenlaub M, Müller-Edenborn B, Arentz T, Jadidi AS, Boveda S. Amplified sinus-P-wave analysis predicts outcomes of cryoballoon ablation in patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: A multicentre study. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023; 10:1110165. [PMID: 37051067 PMCID: PMC10083273 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1110165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Outcomes of catheter ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) remain suboptimal. Non-invasive stratification of patients based on the presence of atrial cardiomyopathy (ACM) could allow to identify the best responders to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Methods Observational multicentre retrospective study in patients undergoing cryoballoon-PVI for non-paroxysmal AF. The duration of amplified P-wave (APW) was measured from a digitally recorded 12-lead electrocardiogram during the procedure. If patients were in AF, direct-current cardioversion was performed to allow APW measurement in sinus rhythm. An APW cut-off of 150 ms was used to identify patients with significant ACM. We assessed freedom from arrhythmia recurrence at long-term follow-up in patients with APW ≥ 150 ms vs. APW < 150 ms. Results We included 295 patients (mean age 62.3 ± 10.6), of whom 193 (65.4%) suffered from persistent AF and the remaining 102 (34.6%) from long-standing persistent AF. One-hundred-forty-two patients (50.2%) experienced arrhythmia recurrence during a mean follow-up of 793 ± 604 days. Patients with APW ≥ 150 ms had a significantly higher recurrence rate post ablation compared to those with APW < 150 ms (57.0% vs. 41.6%; log-rank p < 0.001). On a multivariable Cox-regression analysis, APW≥150 ms was the only independent predictor of arrhythmia recurrence post ablation (HR 2.03 CI95% 1.28-3.21; p = 0.002). Conclusion APW duration predicts arrhythmia recurrence post cryoballoon-PVI in persistent and long-standing persistent AF. An APW cut-off of 150 ms allows to identify patients with significant ACM who have worse outcomes post PVI. Analysis of APW represents an easy, non-invasive and highly reproducible diagnostic tool which allows to identify patients who are the most likely to benefit from PVI-only approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Creta
- Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sandrine Venier
- Department of Cardiology, Grenoble University Hospital and Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France
| | - Konstantinos Tampakis
- Electrophysiology & Pacing Department, Henry Dunant Hospital Center, Athens, Greece
- Département de Rythmologie, Clinique Pasteur, Toulose, France
| | - Rui Providencia
- Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Juno Sunny
- Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Pascal Defaye
- Department of Cardiology, Grenoble University Hospital and Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France
| | - Mark J. Earley
- Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Malcolm Finlay
- Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ross J. Hunter
- Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Pier D. Lambiase
- Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Simon Sporton
- Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - George Andrikopoulos
- Electrophysiology & Pacing Department, Henry Dunant Hospital Center, Athens, Greece
| | - Elodie Deschamps
- Department of Cardiology, Grenoble University Hospital and Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France
| | | | | | - Nicolas Combes
- Département de Rythmologie, Clinique Pasteur, Toulose, France
| | - Stéphane Combes
- Département de Rythmologie, Clinique Pasteur, Toulose, France
| | - Xavier Vinolas
- Arrhythmia Unit, Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Zoraida Moreno-Weidmann
- Arrhythmia Unit, Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Taiyuan Huang
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Martin Eichenlaub
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Björn Müller-Edenborn
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Thomas Arentz
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Amir S. Jadidi
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Serge Boveda
- Département de Rythmologie, Clinique Pasteur, Toulose, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Eldadah ZA, Al-Ahmad A, Bunch TJ, Delurgio DB, Doshi RN, Hook BG, Hranitzky PM, Joyner CA, Mittal S, Porterfield C, Sanchez JE, Thambidorai SK, Wazni OM, McElderry HT. Same-day discharge following catheter ablation and venous closure with VASCADE MVP: A postmarket registry. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2023; 34:348-355. [PMID: 36448428 DOI: 10.1111/jce.15763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Early and safe ambulation can facilitate same-day discharge (SDD) following catheter ablation, which can reduce resource utilization and healthcare costs and improve patient satisfaction. This study evaluated procedure success and safety of the VASCADE MVP venous vascular closure system in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS The AMBULATE SDD Registry is a two-stage series of postmarket studies in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF undergoing catheter ablation followed by femoral venous access-site closure with VASCADE MVP. Efficacy endpoints included SDD success, defined as the proportion of patients discharged the same day who did not require next-day hospital intervention for procedure/access site-related complications, and access site sustained success within 15 days of the procedure. RESULTS Overall, 354 patients were included in the pooled study population, 151 (42.7%) treated for paroxysmal AF and 203 (57.3%) for persistent AF. SDD was achieved in 323 patients (91.2%) and, of these, 320 (99.1%) did not require subsequent hospital intervention based on all study performance outcomes. Nearly all patients (350 of 354; 98.9%) achieved total study success, with no subsequent hospital intervention required. No major access-site complications were recorded. Patients who had SDD were more likely to report procedure satisfaction than patients who stayed overnight. CONCLUSION In this study, 99.7% of patients achieving SDD required no additional hospital intervention for access site-related complications during follow-up. SDD appears feasible and safe for eligible patients after catheter ablation for paroxysmal or persistent AF in which the VASCADE MVP is used for venous access-site closure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zayd A Eldadah
- Heart & Vascular Institute, MedStar Health, Columbia, Maryland, USA
| | - Amin Al-Ahmad
- Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David's Medical Center, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - T Jared Bunch
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Murray, Utah, USA
| | - David B Delurgio
- Department of Medicine, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Rahul N Doshi
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Group, HonorHealth Medical Group, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Bruce G Hook
- Department of Cardiology, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Charles A Joyner
- Department of Cardiology, Levinson Heart Hospital at Chippenham and Johnston Willis Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Suneet Mittal
- Electrophysiology, Valley Health System, Ridgewood, New Jersey, USA
| | | | - Javier E Sanchez
- Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia, Medical City Dallas, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | | | - Oussama M Wazni
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - H Thomas McElderry
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Safety and feasibility of same-day discharge for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2022; 65:803-811. [PMID: 35147827 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-022-01145-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Most centers performing catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) admit the patients for an overnight hospital stay to monitor for post-procedure complications, but the clinical benefits of this overnight hospital admission policy have not been carefully investigated. We hypothesized that same-day discharge strategy is safe and feasible in patients with AF undergoing CA. METHODS A systematic review of studies comparing the safety of same-day discharge vs hospital admission for AF patients undergoing CA was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. No randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria; therefore, observational cohort studies were included. Mantel-Haenszel risk ratios were calculated and I2 statistics were reported for heterogeneity assessment. RESULTS A total of 8 observational studies with 10,102 patients were included. There were no statistically significant differences between same-day discharge vs hospital admission in all studied outcomes including post-discharge 30-day hospital visits (RR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.40-2.02; p = 0.81), post-discharge vascular/bleeding complications (RR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.46-1.88; p = 0.85), post-discharge stroke/transient ischemic attack/thromboembolism (RR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.23-2.20; p = 0.55), and post-discharge recurrent arrhythmias (RR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.60-1.09; p = 0.1). CONCLUSION In carefully selected AF patients undergoing CA, same-day discharge strategy is feasible and safe. There are no significant differences in post-discharge 30-day hospital visits, post-discharge vascular complications, and other safety outcomes. Randomized trials are needed to validate these hypothesis-generating findings.
Collapse
|
16
|
Cooper J, Joseph C, Zagrodzky J, Woods C, Metzl M, Turer RW, McDonald SA, Kulstad E, Daniels J. Active esophageal cooling during radiofrequency ablation of the left atrium: data review and update. Expert Rev Med Devices 2022; 19:949-957. [PMID: 36413154 PMCID: PMC9839561 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2022.2150930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the left atrium of the heart is increasingly used to treat atrial fibrillation (AF). Unfortunately, inadvertent thermal injury to the esophagus can occur during this procedure, potentially creating an atrioesophageal fistula (AEF) which is 80% fatal. The ensoETM (Attune Medical, Chicago, IL), is an esophageal cooling device that has been shown to reduce thermal injury to the esophagus during RF ablation. AREAS COVERED This review summarizes growing evidence related to active esophageal cooling during RF ablation for the treatment of AF. The review presents data demonstrating improved outcomes related to patient safety and procedural efficiency and suggests directions for future research. EXPERT OPINION The use of active esophageal cooling during RF ablation reduces esophageal injury, reduces or eliminates fluoroscopy requirements, reduces procedure duration and post-operative pain, and increases long-term freedom from arrhythmia. These effects in turn increase patient same-day discharge rates, decrease operator cognitive load, and reduce cost. These findings are likely to further accelerate the adoption of active esophageal cooling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Cooper
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390
| | | | - Jason Zagrodzky
- Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David’s South Austin Medical Center, Austin, TX 78704
| | | | - Mark Metzl
- NorthShore University Health System, 2650 Ridge Avenue, Evanston, IL 60201
| | - Robert W. Turer
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390
| | | | - Erik Kulstad
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390
| | - James Daniels
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Deyell MW, Hoskin K, Forman J, Laksman ZW, Hawkins NM, Bennett MT, Yeung-Lai-Wah JA, Chakrabarti S, Krahn AD, Andrade JG. Same-day discharge for atrial fibrillation ablation: outcomes and impact of ablation modality. Europace 2022; 25:400-407. [PMID: 36164922 PMCID: PMC9935052 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euac170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Same-day discharge is increasingly common after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the impact of same-day discharge on healthcare utilization after ablation and whether this differs by ablation modality remains uncertain. We examined the safety, efficacy, and subsequent healthcare utilization of a same-day discharge protocol for AF ablation, including radiofrequency (RF) and cryoballoon ablation, in a contemporary cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS All consecutive patients for whom full healthcare utilization data were available at two centres and who underwent AF ablation from 2018 to 2019 were included. Same-day discharge was the default strategy for all patients. The efficacy and safety outcomes were proportions of same-day discharge and readmission/emergency room (ER) visits, and post-discharge complications, respectively. Of the 421 patients who underwent AF ablation (mean 63.3 ± 10.2 years, 33% female), 90.5% (381/421) achieved same-day discharge with no difference between RF and cryoballoon ablation (89.8 vs. 95.1%, adjusted P = 0.327). Readmission ≤30 days occurred in 4.8%, with ER visits ≤30 days seen in 26.1% with no difference between ablation modalities (P = 0.634). Patients admitted overnight were more likely to present to the ER (40.0 vs. 24.7% with same-day discharge, P = 0.036). The overall post-discharge complication rate was low at 4/421 (1.0%), with no difference between ablation modality (P = 0.324) and admission/same-day discharge (P = 0.485). CONCLUSION Same-day discharge can be achieved in a majority of patients undergoing RF or cryoballoon ablation for AF. Healthcare utilization, particularly ER visits, remains high after AF ablation, regardless of ablation modality or same-day discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc W Deyell
- Corresponding author. Tel: +1 605 806 8256. E-mail address:
| | - Kurt Hoskin
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, #200-1033 Davie Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6E 1M7
| | - Jacqueline Forman
- St. Paul's Hospital, Providence Health Care, 1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6Z 1Y6
| | - Zachary W Laksman
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, #200-1033 Davie Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6E 1M7,Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, 9th Floor, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 1M9
| | - Nathaniel M Hawkins
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, #200-1033 Davie Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6E 1M7,Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, 9th Floor, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 1M9
| | - Matthew T Bennett
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, #200-1033 Davie Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6E 1M7,Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, 9th Floor, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 1M9
| | - John A Yeung-Lai-Wah
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, #200-1033 Davie Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6E 1M7
| | - Santabhanu Chakrabarti
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, #200-1033 Davie Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6E 1M7
| | - Andrew D Krahn
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, #200-1033 Davie Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6E 1M7,Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, 9th Floor, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 1M9
| | - Jason G Andrade
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, #200-1033 Davie Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6E 1M7,Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, 9th Floor, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 1M9
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Maclean E, Mahtani K, Roelas M, Vyas R, Butcher C, Ahluwalia N, Honarbakhsh S, Creta A, Finlay M, Chow A, Earley MJ, Sporton S, Lowe MD, Sawhney V, Ezzat V, Ahsan S, Khan F, Dhinoja M, Lambiase PD, Schilling RJ, Hunter RJ, Segal OR. Transseptal puncture for left atrial ablation: risk factors for cardiac tamponade and a proposed causative classification system. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2022; 33:1747-1755. [PMID: 35671359 PMCID: PMC9543389 DOI: 10.1111/jce.15590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Aims Cardiac tamponade is a high morbidity complication of transseptal puncture (TSP). We examined the associations of TSP‐related cardiac tamponade (TRCT) for all patients undergoing left atrial ablation at our center from 2016 to 2020. Methods and Results Patient and procedural variables were extracted retrospectively. Cases of cardiac tamponade were scrutinized to adjudicate TSP culpability. Adjusted multivariate analysis examined predictors of TRCT. A total of 3239 consecutive TSPs were performed; cardiac tamponade occurred in 51 patients (incidence: 1.6%) and was adjudicated as TSP‐related in 35 (incidence: 1.1%; 68.6% of all tamponades). Patients of above‐median age [odds ratio (OR): 2.4 (1.19–4.2), p = .006] and those undergoing re‐do procedures [OR: 1.95 (1.29–3.43, p = .042] were at higher risk of TRCT. Of the operator‐dependent variables, choice of transseptal needle (Endrys vs. Brockenbrough, p > .1) or puncture sheath (Swartz vs. Mullins vs. Agilis vs. Vizigo vs. Cryosheath, all p > .1) did not predict TRCT. Adjusting for operator, equipment and demographics, failure to cross the septum first pass increased TRCT risk [OR: 4.42 (2.45–8.2), p = .001], whilst top quartile operator experience [OR: 0.4 (0.17–0.85), p = .002], transoesophageal echocardiogram [TOE prevalence: 26%, OR: 0.51 (0.11–0.94), p = .023], and use of the SafeSept transseptal guidewire [OR: 0.22 (0.08–0.62), p = .001] reduced TRCT risk. An increase in transseptal guidewire use over time (2016: 15.6%, 2020: 60.2%) correlated with an annual reduction in TRCT (R2 = 0.72, p < .001) and was associated with a relative risk reduction of 70%. Conclusions During left atrial ablation, the risk of TRCT was reduced by operator experience, TOE‐guidance, and use of a transseptal guidewire, and was increased by patient age, re‐do procedures, and failure to cross the septum first pass.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Maclean
- Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 4AS, UK.,William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - K Mahtani
- Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 4AS, UK
| | - M Roelas
- Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 4AS, UK
| | - R Vyas
- Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 4AS, UK
| | - C Butcher
- Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 4AS, UK
| | - N Ahluwalia
- Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 4AS, UK
| | - S Honarbakhsh
- Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 4AS, UK
| | - A Creta
- Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 4AS, UK
| | - M Finlay
- Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 4AS, UK
| | - A Chow
- Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 4AS, UK
| | - M J Earley
- Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 4AS, UK
| | - S Sporton
- Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 4AS, UK
| | - M D Lowe
- Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 4AS, UK
| | - V Sawhney
- Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 4AS, UK
| | - V Ezzat
- Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 4AS, UK
| | - S Ahsan
- Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 4AS, UK
| | - F Khan
- Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 4AS, UK
| | - M Dhinoja
- Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 4AS, UK
| | - P D Lambiase
- Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 4AS, UK
| | - R J Schilling
- Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 4AS, UK.,William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - R J Hunter
- Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 4AS, UK.,William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - O R Segal
- Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 4AS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tang PT, Davies M, Bashir Y, Betts TR, Pedersen M, Rajappan K, Ginks MR, Wijesurendra RS. Efficacy and safety of same-day discharge after atrial fibrillation ablation compared with post-procedural overnight stay: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace 2022; 24:1569-1584. [PMID: 35640891 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euac068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has historically required inpatient admission post-procedure, but same-day discharge (SDD) has recently been reported. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of SDD compared with overnight stay (OS) post-ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS We performed a systematic search of the PubMed database. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to assess the efficacy (successful SDD) and safety (24 h complications, 30-day complications, 30-day re-admissions, and 30-day mortality) of a SDD AF ablation strategy. Fourteen non-randomized observational studies met criteria for inclusion, encompassing 26488 patients undergoing AF ablation, of whom 9766 were SDD. The mean age of participants was 61.9 years, and 67.9% were male. Around 61.7% underwent ablation for paroxysmal AF. The pooled success rate of SDD was 83.2% [95% confidence intervals (CIs): 61.5-97.0%, I2 100%]. The risk of bias was severe for all effect estimates due to confounding, as most cohorts were retrospectively identified without appropriately matched comparators. There was no significant difference in 30-day complications [odds ratio (OR): 0.95, 95% CI: 0.65-1.40, I2 53%] or 30-day re-admission (OR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.49-1.89, I2 82%) between groups. There were insufficient data for meta-analysis of 24 h complications and 30-day mortality. Where reported, no re-admissions occurred due to 24 h complications after SDD. Two deaths (0.04%) were reported in both SDD and OS groups. CONCLUSION Same-day discharge after AF ablation appears to be an effective and safe strategy in selected patients. However, the available evidence is of low quality, and more robust prospective studies comparing SDD to OS are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pok-Tin Tang
- Royal Berkshire Hospital, Royal Berkshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, RG1 5AN Reading, UK
| | - Mark Davies
- Oxford Heart Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, OX3 9DU Oxford, UK
| | - Yaver Bashir
- Oxford Heart Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, OX3 9DU Oxford, UK
| | - Timothy R Betts
- Oxford Heart Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, OX3 9DU Oxford, UK.,Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, OX3 9DU Oxford, UK.,Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, OX3 9DU University of Oxford, UK
| | - Michala Pedersen
- Oxford Heart Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, OX3 9DU Oxford, UK
| | - Kim Rajappan
- Oxford Heart Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, OX3 9DU Oxford, UK
| | - Matthew R Ginks
- Oxford Heart Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, OX3 9DU Oxford, UK
| | - Rohan S Wijesurendra
- Oxford Heart Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, OX3 9DU Oxford, UK.,Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, OX3 9DU Oxford, UK.,Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, OX3 9DU University of Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Steinberg BA, Woolley S, Li H, Crawford C, Groh C, Navaravong L, Ranjan R, Zenger B, Zhang Y, Jared Bunch T. Patient‐reported Outcomes and Costs Associated with Vascular Closure and Same‐Day Discharge following Atrial Fibrillation Ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2022; 33:1737-1744. [PMID: 35598310 PMCID: PMC9398969 DOI: 10.1111/jce.15555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Revised: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to measure patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and costs associated with same-day discharge (SDD) for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation and vascular closure device implantation in clinical practice. METHODS PROs were prospectively measured in 50 AF ablation patients, comparing complete vascular device closure (n = 25) versus manual compression hemostasis (n = 25). Health-system costs for SDD patients receiving vascular device closure were compared to matched controls with one-night stays who did not receive any closure device. RESULTS Prospectively enrolled patients receiving vascular device closure for AF ablation had a mean age of 65 years, 17% were female, with a mean CHA2 DS2 -VASc score of 3. The mean number of venous sheaths was higher among patients receiving vascular device closure (3.8 vs. 3.1, p < 0.001), and there was one case of rebleeding in a patient receiving a vascular closure device (no other complications). Same-day discharge rates (76% vs. 8.3%, p < 0.001), patient satisfaction with bedrest time (8.5 vs. 6, p = 0.004) and with pain (8 vs. 5.1, p = 0.009) were significantly better among patients receiving vascular closure. In matched analyses of health-system costs, patients with vascular closure had mean age 66, 32% were female, and the mean CHA2 DS2 -VASc score was 2 (p = NS vs. controls). SDD with vascular closure was associated with the significantly lower facility, pharmacy, and disposable costs, but higher implant costs. Overall costs for ablation were not significantly different (mean difference 1.10%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.03 to 5.42). CONCLUSIONS Vascular closure for AF ablation improves patient experience in routine care. The use of vascular closure and SDD after AF ablation reduces several components of healthcare system costs, without an overall increase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin A. Steinberg
- Division of Cardiovascular MedicineUniversity of Utah Health Sciences CenterSalt Lake CityUT
| | - Shannon Woolley
- Division of Cardiovascular MedicineUniversity of Utah Health Sciences CenterSalt Lake CityUT
| | - Haojia Li
- Division of EpidemiologyDepartment of Internal MedicineUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUT
| | | | - Christopher Groh
- Division of Cardiovascular MedicineUniversity of Utah Health Sciences CenterSalt Lake CityUT
| | - Leenhapong Navaravong
- Division of Cardiovascular MedicineUniversity of Utah Health Sciences CenterSalt Lake CityUT
| | - Ravi Ranjan
- Division of Cardiovascular MedicineUniversity of Utah Health Sciences CenterSalt Lake CityUT
| | - Brian Zenger
- Division of Cardiovascular MedicineUniversity of Utah Health Sciences CenterSalt Lake CityUT
| | - Yue Zhang
- Division of EpidemiologyDepartment of Internal MedicineUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUT
| | - T. Jared Bunch
- Division of Cardiovascular MedicineUniversity of Utah Health Sciences CenterSalt Lake CityUT
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Innovations in atrial fibrillation ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2022; 66:737-756. [PMID: 35411440 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-022-01215-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Catheter-based ablation to perform pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has established itself as a mainstay in the rhythm control strategy of atrial fibrillation. This review article aims to provide an overview of recent advances in atrial fibrillation ablation technology. METHODS We reviewed the available literature and clinical trials of innovations in atrial fibrillation ablation technologies including ablation catheter designs, alternative energy sources, esophageal protection methods, electroanatomical mapping, and novel ablation targets. RESULTS Innovative radiofrequency (RF) catheter designs maximize energy delivery while avoiding overheating associated with conventional catheters. Single-shot balloon catheters in the form of cryoballoons, radiofrequency, and laser balloons have proven effective at producing pulmonary vein isolation and improving procedural efficiency and reproducibility. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a highly anticipated novel nonthermal energy source under development, which demonstrates selective ablation of the myocardium, producing durable lesions while also minimizing collateral damage. Innovative devices for esophageal protection including esophageal deviation and cooling devices have been developed to reduce esophageal complications. Improved electroanatomical mapping systems are being developed to help identify additional non-pulmonary triggers, which may benefit from ablation, especially with persistent atrial fibrillation. Lastly, the vein of Marshall alcohol ablation has been recently studied as an adjunct therapy for improving outcomes with catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. CONCLUSIONS Numerous advances have been made in the field of atrial fibrillation ablation in the past decade. While further long-term data is still needed for these novel technologies, they show potential to improve procedural efficacy and safety.
Collapse
|
22
|
König S, Richter S, Bollmann A, Hindricks G. Safety and feasibility of same-day discharge following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: what is known and what needs to be explored? Herz 2022; 47:123-128. [PMID: 35257191 DOI: 10.1007/s00059-022-05102-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most effective rhythm control strategy and its role in the treatment of AF patients has been strengthened by recent guidelines. An increasing AF prevalence and the resulting demands on interventional electrophysiology call for improved resource allocation through both technical innovations and streamlined workflows and patient pathways. Same-day discharge is already established in the context of other electrophysiological interventions; however, its broad implementation in the practice of AF ablation is pending for several reasons, despite the fact that the body of evidence is growing and the majority of reports propagate early discharge to be feasible and safe under certain conditions. This review article is intended to provide an overview of the existing data, classify these into the specific study context, and to show limitations and open questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian König
- Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Strümpellstr. 39, 04289, Leipzig, Germany.
- Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Sergio Richter
- Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Strümpellstr. 39, 04289, Leipzig, Germany
- Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Andreas Bollmann
- Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Strümpellstr. 39, 04289, Leipzig, Germany
- Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Gerhard Hindricks
- Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Strümpellstr. 39, 04289, Leipzig, Germany
- Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
König S, Andrade JG, Bollmann A. Administrative data confirm safety of same-day discharge following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: all good or is there a fly in the ointment? Europace 2022; 24:701-702. [PMID: 35138369 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euac009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian König
- Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Strümpellstraße 39, 04289 Leipzig, Germany.,Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jason G Andrade
- Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Andreas Bollmann
- Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Strümpellstraße 39, 04289 Leipzig, Germany.,Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Rashedi S, Tavolinejad H, Kazemian S, Mardani M, Masoudi M, Masoudkabir F, Haghjoo M. Efficacy and safety of same-day discharge after atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Cardiol 2022; 45:162-172. [PMID: 35084049 PMCID: PMC8860483 DOI: 10.1002/clc.23778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Revised: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Conventionally, patients have been admitted overnight after atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation. Several centers have recently adopted a same‐day discharge (SDD) protocol for patients undergoing AF catheter ablation. We aimed to systematically review the current evidence for the safety and efficacy of SDD after AF catheter ablation. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library until August 21, 2021. The risk of bias was assessed with the “Methodological Index for Non‐Randomized Studies” (MINORS). The pooled efficacy rate of SDD protocol (defined as the proportion of patients discharged the same day of ablation among the patients who were planned for SDD) was calculated. Meanwhile, pooled major complication rates and early readmission or emergency department (ED) visit rates were evaluated in successful and planned SDD groups separately. Overall, 12 observational studies consisting of 18,065 catheter ablations were included, among which 7320 (40.52%) were discharged the same‐day after ablation. The pooled efficacy was 90.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] [82.7–96.0]). The major complication rates were 1.1% (95%CI [0.5–1.9]), and 0.7% (95% CI [0.0–3.1]) in planned SDD and successful SDD groups, respectively. In addition, readmission/ED visit rate were 3.0% (95%CI [0.9–6.1]), and 3.1% (95% CI [0.8–6.5]) in the same groups. There were no significant differences between planned SDD and overnight groups with respect to major complication rate (risk ratio = 0.70, 95%CI [0.35–1.42], p‐value = .369). The available data indicates that SDD after AF ablation is safe and efficient. Further prospective and randomized studies are warranted to elucidate the safety of SDD after AF ablation and develop a standardized SDD protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sina Rashedi
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hamed Tavolinejad
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Sina Kazemian
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Cardiac Primary Prevention Research Center, Cardiovascular Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mahta Mardani
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Maryam Masoudi
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Farzad Masoudkabir
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Majid Haghjoo
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Cardiac Electrophysiology Research Center, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Bailey SA, Subramanian K, Sanchez J, P Horton R, Natale A, Thambidorai S. Same Day versus Overnight Discharge in Patients Undergoing Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation (SODA) Study. J Atr Fibrillation 2021; 14:20200499. [PMID: 34950374 DOI: 10.4022/jafib.20200499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Revised: 04/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) are routinely admitted for observation overnight in the hospital. With the rising incidence of AF among the population, increased volumes of procedures are placing increased demands on hospital resources. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of same day discharge in patients undergoing ablation for AF when compared to patients admitted for overnight observation. We performed a retrospective analysis using a multicenter cohort among patients who were discharged home after elective pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) ablation for AF. In our analysis, we found no statistically significant difference between patients discharged on the day of their procedure when compared to patients admitted for overnight observation in terms of 90-day readmission, major adverse cardiovascular events and death. This study shows that same day discharge after AF ablation is a feasible option. Future studies are needed to elicit the appropriate protocol to use.
Collapse
|
26
|
Sahashi Y, Kuno T, Tanaka Y, Passman R, Briasoulis A, Malik AH. The 30-day readmission rate of same-day discharge protocol following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a propensity score-matched analysis from National Readmission Database. Europace 2021; 24:755-761. [PMID: 34904164 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euab296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS The effectiveness and safety of same-day discharge (SDD) for catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been fully elucidated using a large nationwide database. This study aimed to evaluate the all-cause readmission rates within 30-days among patients receiving CA for AF with an SDD protocol compared with a conventional overnight stay (ONS). METHODS AND RESULTS We performed a retrospective cohort study using the US Nationwide Readmission Database. The primary outcome was all-cause 30-day readmission following discharge in patients receiving CA and a secondary outcome was requiring total healthcare cost. A 1 : 3 propensity score matching was conducted to compare the safety and efficacy within both SDD and ONS group. Among 30 776 patients [mean 67.2 ± 11.4 years, 12 590 female (41.5%)] who received CA from 2016 through 2018, 440 (1.42%) patients were discharged on the same-day following CA (SDD group), and the remaining 30 336 patients stayed at least one night in the hospital (ONS group). A propensity score analysis generated 1751 matched pairs (440 in the SDD group; 1311 in the ONS group). The 30-day readmission following discharge was not significantly higher in the SDD group than the ONS group (SDD vs. ONS: 12.7% vs. 9.7%; hazard ratio: 1.17, 95% confidence interval: 0.76-1.81, P = 0.47). Healthcare cost was significantly higher in the ONS group ($25 237 ± 14 036 vs. $30 749 ± 16 383; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION In this nationwide database study, there was no significant difference in the all-cause 30-day readmission following SDD for CA compared with ONS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Sahashi
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gifu Heart Center, 4-14-4, Yabutaminami, Gifu 500-8384, Japan.,Department of Cardiology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan.,Department of Health Data Science, Graduate School of Data Science, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Toshiki Kuno
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, NY, USA.,Division of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yoshihiro Tanaka
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.,Center for Arrhythmia Research, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Rod Passman
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.,Center for Arrhythmia Research, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Alexandros Briasoulis
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Aaqib H Malik
- Division of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Prasitlumkum N, Cheungpasitporn W, Chokesuwattanaskul R, Kewcharoen J, Tokavanich N, Navaravong L, Jongnarangsin K. Comparison between same-day discharge and overnight stay after atrial fibrillation ablation: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY: PACE 2021; 44:2054-2066. [PMID: 34657314 DOI: 10.1111/pace.14380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Revised: 08/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the modern era, atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation trend has been shifted toward same-day discharge (SDD), from a traditional overnight stay. Yet, recent studies have not well stated the safety profiles which remained poor-understood and dispersed. We hence performed systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the adverse outcomes of SDD in comparison with an overnight stay. METHODS Databases were searched through January 2021. Effect estimates from the individual studies were extracted and combined using random-effects, generic inverse variance method of der Simonian and Laird. The primary outcomes included total cumulative complications and immediate complications following AF ablation. RESULTS Ten observational studies were met our inclusion criteria, comprising of total population of 11,660 patients, with SDD 51.3%. For total cumulative complications, there were no differences observed between SDD and overnight stay (5.2% vs. 6.2%: pooled OR 0.77: 95% CI 0.55-1.08, p = .13 with I2 = 27.1%). In addition, comparable immediate complications were also demonstrated (5.2 % vs. 4.3: pooled OR 1.08: 95% CI 0.72-1.62, p = .718, with I2 = 37.3 %). CONCLUSION Our study suggested that SDD had similar complication rates, both total cumulative and immediate outcomes, compared with overnight stay in selected patients following AF ablation. Nevertheless, randomized control trials are warranted to validate the findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narut Prasitlumkum
- Division of Cardiology, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, USA
| | | | - Ronpichai Chokesuwattanaskul
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.,Cardiac Center, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.,Center of Excellence in Arrhythmia Research Chulalongkorn University, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Jakrin Kewcharoen
- Department of Cardiology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California
| | - Nithi Tokavanich
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.,Center of Excellence in Arrhythmia Research Chulalongkorn University, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Leenhapong Navaravong
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Krit Jongnarangsin
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Paul Nordin A, Drca N, Insulander P, Bastani H, Bourke T, Braunschweig F, Kennebäck G, von Olshausen G, Sadigh B, Saluveer O, Tapanainen J, Schwieler J, Åkerström F, Jensen-Urstad M. Low incidence of major complications after the first six hours post atrial fibrillation ablation: Is same-day discharge safe and feasible in most patients? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2021; 32:2953-2960. [PMID: 34535936 DOI: 10.1111/jce.15243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2021] [Revised: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
AIMS This study evaluates the incidence of procedural complications related to catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) to assess the potential feasibility and safety of same-day discharge in a large cohort. METHODS We performed an analysis of prospectively collected data of complications of all patients staying overnight after undergoing AF ablation between 2001 and 2020 at a tertiary center. Using medical records, we analyzed complications occurring intraprocedurally until 6 h postablation and between 6 h postablation and discharge the day after the ablation procedure. RESULTS In 5414 AF ablations, we identified a total of 108 (2.0%) major complications occurring intraprocedural or before discharge. Most major complications occurred intraprocedurally or within 6 h after the procedure (n = 96, 1.8%). Twelve (0.2%) major complications occurred between 6 h Postablation and discharge. The most common of these major complications were congestive heart failure (n = 6) and transient ischemic attack (TIA, n = 4). During this time span, 61 (1.1%) minor complications occurred. Factors independently associated with major complications intraprocedurally and until discharge were body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 (p = .009), significant valvular disease (p = .001), cardiomyopathy (p < .001), prior stroke or TIA (p = .014), first-time procedure versus repeat procedure (p = .013), cryoablation versus radiofrequency (p < .001), and procedure duration (p < .001). CONCLUSION After AF ablation, very few complications occurred between 6 h postprocedure and discharge the next day. Therefore, same-day discharge is a safe option for a majority of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Astrid Paul Nordin
- Department of Cardiology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Nikola Drca
- Department of Cardiology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per Insulander
- Department of Cardiology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hamid Bastani
- Department of Cardiology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tara Bourke
- Department of Cardiology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Frieder Braunschweig
- Department of Cardiology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Göran Kennebäck
- Department of Cardiology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gesa von Olshausen
- Department of Cardiology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Bita Sadigh
- Department of Cardiology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ott Saluveer
- Department of Cardiology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jari Tapanainen
- Department of Cardiology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jonas Schwieler
- Department of Cardiology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Finn Åkerström
- Department of Cardiology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mats Jensen-Urstad
- Department of Cardiology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bourier F, Popa M, Kottmaier M, Maurer S, Bahlke F, Telishevska M, Lengauer S, Koch-Büttner K, Kornmayer M, Risse E, Brkic A, Reents T, Hessling G, Deisenhofer I. RF electrode-tissue coverage significantly influences steam pop incidence and lesion size. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2021; 32:1594-1599. [PMID: 33928696 DOI: 10.1111/jce.15063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Revised: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Steam pops are a rare complication associated with radiofrequency (RF) ablation and are hard to predict. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of coverage between the RF ablation electrode and cardiac tissue on steam pop incidence and lesion size. METHODS AND RESULTS An ex vivo model using porcine cardiac preparations and contact force sensing catheters was designed to perform RF ablations at different coverage levels between the RF electrode and cardiac tissue. During coverage level I, only the distal part of the ablation electrode was in contact with tissue. During coverage level II half of the ablation electrode, and during coverage level III the entire ablation electrode was embedded in tissue. RF applications (n = 60) at different coverage levels I-III were systematically performed using the same standardized ablation protocol. Ablations during coverage level III resulted in a significantly higher rate of steam pops (100%) when compared to ablations during coverage level II (10%) and coverage level I (0%), log rank p < .001. Coverage level I ablations resulted in significantly smaller lesion depths, diameters, and impedance drops when compared to higher coverage level ablations, p < .001. In the controlled ex vivo model, there was no difference in applied contact force or energy between different coverage levels. CONCLUSIONS The level of coverage between RF electrode, cardiac tissue, and the surrounding fluid significantly influenced the incidence of steam pops in an ex vivo setup. Larger coverage between RF electrode and tissue resulted in significantly larger lesion dimensions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Bourier
- Department of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Miruna Popa
- Department of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marc Kottmaier
- Department of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Susanne Maurer
- Department of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Fabian Bahlke
- Department of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marta Telishevska
- Department of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sarah Lengauer
- Department of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Katharina Koch-Büttner
- Department of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marielouise Kornmayer
- Department of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Elena Risse
- Department of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Amir Brkic
- Department of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Tilko Reents
- Department of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Gabriele Hessling
- Department of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Isabel Deisenhofer
- Department of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Chu E, Zhang C, Musikantow DR, Turagam MK, Langan N, Sofi A, Choudry S, Syros G, Miller MA, Koruth JS, Whang W, Dukkipati SR, Reddy VY. Barriers and financial impact of same-day discharge after atrial fibrillation ablation. PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY: PACE 2021; 44:711-719. [PMID: 33686695 DOI: 10.1111/pace.14217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Revised: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Same-day discharge (SDD) after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is increasingly being considered. This study examined the barriers and financial impact associated with SDD in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing elective AF ablation. METHODS A single center retrospective review was conducted of the 249 first case-of-the-day outpatient AF ablations performed in 2019 to evaluate the proportion of patients that could have undergone SDD. Barriers to SDD were defined as any intervention that prevented SDD by 8 p.m. The financial impact of SDD was based on savings from avoidance of the overnight hospital stay and revenue related to management of chest pain facilitated by a vacant hospital bed. RESULTS SDD could have occurred in 157 patients (63%) without change in management and in up to 200 patients (80%) if avoidable barriers were addressed. Barriers to SDD included non-clinical logistical issues (43%), prolonged post-procedure recovery (42%) and minor procedural complications (15%). On multivariate analysis, factors associated with barriers to SDD included increasing age (P = .01), left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35% (P = .04), and severely dilated left atrium (P = .04). The financial gain from SDD would have ranged from $1,110,096 (assuming discharge of 63% of eligible patients) to $1,480,128 (assuming 80% discharge) over the course of a year. CONCLUSIONS Up to 80% of patients undergoing outpatient AF ablation were amenable to SDD if avoidable delays in care had been anticipated. Based on reduced hospital operating expenses and increased revenue from management of individuals with chest pain, this would translate to a financial savings of ∼$1.5 million.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Chu
- Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Zena and Michael A. Weiner Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Chi Zhang
- Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Zena and Michael A. Weiner Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Daniel R Musikantow
- Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Zena and Michael A. Weiner Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mohit K Turagam
- Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Zena and Michael A. Weiner Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Noelle Langan
- Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Zena and Michael A. Weiner Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Aamir Sofi
- Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Zena and Michael A. Weiner Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Subbarao Choudry
- Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Zena and Michael A. Weiner Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Georgios Syros
- Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Zena and Michael A. Weiner Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Marc A Miller
- Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Zena and Michael A. Weiner Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jacob S Koruth
- Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Zena and Michael A. Weiner Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - William Whang
- Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Zena and Michael A. Weiner Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Srinivas R Dukkipati
- Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Zena and Michael A. Weiner Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Vivek Y Reddy
- Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Zena and Michael A. Weiner Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Creta A, Kanthasamy V, Schilling RJ, Rosengarten J, Khan F, Honarbakhsh S, Earley MJ, Hunter RJ, Finlay M. First experience of POLARx™ versus Arctic Front Advance™: An early technology comparison. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2021; 32:925-930. [PMID: 33590568 DOI: 10.1111/jce.14951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2020] [Revised: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cryoballoon ablation is an established technique to achieve pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Recently, a new manufacturer of cryoballoon achieved regulatory CE marking (POLARx™; Boston Scientific). We describe our early experience of using this new market entrant of the technology and describe procedural aspects in comparison to the incumbent Medtronic Arctic Front Advance™. METHODS We assessed the first 40 AF ablations performed with the POLARx catheter at the Barts Heart Centre. These patients were compared with a contemporaneous series of patients undergoing ablation by the same operators using the Arctic Front Advance. Procedural metrics were prospectively recorded. RESULTS A total of four operators undertook 40 cases using the POLARx catheter, compared with 40 cases using the Arctic Front Advance. Procedure times (60.0 vs. 60.0 min) were similar between the two technologies, however left atrial dwell time (35.0 vs 39.0 min) and fluoroscopy times (3.3 vs. 5.2 min) were higher with the POLARx. Measured nadir and isolation balloon temperatures were significantly lower with POLARx. Almost all veins were isolated with a median freezing time of 16.0 (POLARx) versus 15.0 (Arctic Front Advance) min. The rate of procedural complications was low in both groups. CONCLUSION The POLARx cryoballoon is effective for pulmonary vein isolation. Measured isolation and nadir temperatures are lower compared with the predicate Arctic Front Advance catheter. The technology appears similar in acute efficacy and has a short learning curve, but formal dosing studies may be required to prove equivalence of efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Creta
- Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health National Health Service Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | - James Rosengarten
- Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health National Health Service Trust, London, UK
| | - Fakhar Khan
- Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health National Health Service Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Mark J Earley
- Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health National Health Service Trust, London, UK
| | - Ross J Hunter
- Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health National Health Service Trust, London, UK
| | - Malcom Finlay
- Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health National Health Service Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|