Clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of atrioesophageal fistula resulting from atrial fibrillation ablation

Redo ablation procedures to treat recurrent atrial arrhythmias via a pentaspline pulsed field ablation catheter: a prospective, multicenter experience

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation may require redo procedures involving pulmonary vein (PV) re-isolation and/or ablation of extra-PV sites. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) offers a highly selective energy source for cardiac tissue, with the potential to reduce collateral damage to adjacent structures. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of redo ablation using a pentaspline PFA system.

METHODS

Patients undergoing redo procedures with a pentaspline PFA system at three international centers were enrolled. A workflow was established based on rhythm at presentation: sinus rhythm (Group 1), atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia (Group 2), or AF (Group 3). Propensity score matching was used for comparison between PFA- and RF-based redo ablations.

RESULTS

A total of 117 patients were included (Group 1: 64, Group 2: 18, Group 3: 35). PV re-isolation was required in 71.9% and 72.2% of Group 1 and 2 patients, respectively. PFA terminated all cases of non-cavotricuspid isthmus dependent flutter and 45.7% of cases of AF. One major complication (0.9%; frontal cerebral hematoma) was documented. Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias at 12 months was 78.3% (95% CI 69.6-84.8%) without statistically significant differences among groups (Group 1: 85.7%; Group 2: 77%; Group 3: 65.5%; p = 0.053). PFA led to similar arrhythmia freedom compared to RF, but with significantly shorter procedural and dwelling times.

CONCLUSION

The adoption of a pentaspline PFA system for repeat ablation procedures was feasible, safe, and effective at 1-year follow-up. No clinical differences were observed between PFA and RF; however, redo PFA cases were significantly shorter.

A 71-Year-Old Man With Gas Accumulation in the Left Atrium

CASE PRESENTATION

A 71-year-old man with a history of atrial fibrillation presented to the emergency department with sudden unconsciousness after finishing lunch. Just 4 weeks ago, the patient underwent radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation and regularly took rivaroxaban for anticoagulant therapy. According to the medical history, the patient suffered recurrent chest tightness and heartburn after radiofrequency ablation without other discomforts. During transportation to the hospital, the patient experienced a drop in BP after forceful vomiting.

Catheter ablation using pulsed-field energy: Advantages and limitations compared with conventional energy

Atrial fibrillation (AF) poses significant risks of heart failure and stroke, emphasizing effective treatment. Catheter ablation using thermal energy sources, such as radiofrequency or cryoballoon ablation, has shown greater success in maintaining sinus rhythm compared with drug therapy. However, thermal ablation (TA) is associated with serious complications, such as atrial-esophageal fistula, phrenic nerve palsy, and pulmonary vein stenosis. Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is an emerging ablation energy source that uses electroporation to selectively target cardiac tissue while sparing adjacent structures such as nerves and blood vessels. Two randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that PFA is comparable to TA in both efficacy and safety at a 1-year follow-up and had shorter procedure times. A review of six meta-analyses consistently showed shorter procedural times for PFA across all studies. Additionally, three out of the four recent studies with large samples reported lower recurrence rates with PFA. Regarding complication rates, four out of four studies showed lower incidences of phrenic nerve injury with PFA, and two out of three studies reported lower rates of esophageal injury with PFA. However, four out of four studies indicated higher incidences of cardiac tamponade with PFA, highlighting the need for caution among early-career operators. Furthermore, careful monitoring is required considering the possible unforeseen complications specific to PFA and the lack of long-term follow-up data. Despite these concerns, PFA shows promise as a safer, more effective, and efficient alternative to TA for AF, particularly as operator experience and device technology continue to advance.

Proactive esophageal cooling during radiofrequency cardiac ablation: data update including applications in very high-power short duration ablation

INTRODUCTION

Proactive esophageal cooling reduces injury during radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the left atrium (LA) for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). New catheters are capable of higher wattage settings up to 90 W (very high-power short duration, vHPSD) for 4 s. Varying power and duration, however, does not eliminate the risk of thermal injury. Furthermore, alternative energy sources such as pulsed field ablation (PFA) also exhibit thermal effects, with clinical data showing esophageal temperatures up to 40.3°C. The ensoETM esophageal cooling device (Attune Medical, now a part of Haemonetics, Boston, MA, U.S.A.) is commercially available and FDA-cleared to reduce thermal injury to the esophagus during RF ablation for AF and is recommended in the 2024 expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of AF.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes growing evidence of esophageal cooling during high power RF ablation for AF treatment, including data relating to procedural efficacy, safety, and efficiency, and techniques to enhance operator success while providing directions for further research.

EXPERT OPINION

Proactive esophageal cooling reduces injury to the esophagus during high power RF ablation, and utilizing this approach may result in increased success in first-pass isolation, procedural efficiency, and long-term efficacy.

Incidence, Mechanism, and Management of Atrial Ablation Procedure Complications: A Literature Review

The number of atrial catheter ablation procedures has significantly increased in recent years, becoming a first-line treatment modality for various supraventricular tachycardias due to their safety and efficacy. Complications, ranging from mild to life-threatening, can arise during different stages of the procedure, including vascular access complications (eg, hematoma or vascular fistula formation, retroperitoneal bleeding, etc.), thromboembolic complications (eg, stroke, transient ischemic attack, air embolism, etc.), mechanical complications (eg, cardiac perforation and tamponade), as well as pulmonary vein stenosis, atrio-esophageal fistulas, phrenic nerve injury, and gastroparesis. Atrial fibrillation ablation procedures, in particular, carry a higher complication rate due to their complexity. This review discusses the incidence, mechanisms, diagnosis, management, and prevention of these complications. Key strategies to reduce risks include optimized anticoagulation protocols, the use of intracardiac echocardiography, reduced energy delivery, and esophageal temperature monitoring, among others. Timely detection and intervention, especially in the case of life-threatening complications, is crucial. Pulsed-field ablation, a novel technique using nonthermal electrical energy, offers a promising and precise alternative to conventional thermal ablation with a favorable safety profile. However, further research is needed to fully understand its complications and refine management strategies.

A novel focal lattice-tip catheter toggling between pulsed field energy and radiofrequency for atrial arrhythmia ablation: Results from a real-world, multicenter registry

BACKGROUND

A novel focal lattice-tip catheter allowing the delivery of either pulsed field (PF) or radiofrequency (RF) energy has recently received regulatory approval. The technology features a proprietary 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping system.

OBJECTIVE

We describe the first real-world and multicenter experience.

METHODS

Consecutive AF patients undergoing first-time or redo atrial tachyarrhythmia ablation with the Affera system were prospectively enrolled at 3 different centers. PF was the only energy source allowed when ablating the posterior left atrium; anterior applications were performed with either RF (PF/RF strategy) or PF (PF/PF strategy) on the basis of the operator's preference. The primary efficacy end point included acute electrical isolation of pulmonary veins and posterior wall or bidirectional block in case of linear lesions.

RESULTS

The study included 130 patients (mean age, 67 ± 10 years; 63.8% [n = 83] male; 61.5% [n = 80] nonparoxysmal AF; 55.4% first-time AF ablation). First-time pulmonary vein isolation was performed in 72 patients: RF/PF in 13 (18.1%) patients and PF/PF in the remaining 59 (81.9%); first-pass isolation for pulmonary vein and posterior wall was achieved in 100% of cases. A total of 289 ablation lines were performed (roof line, 91 patients; inferior line, 83 patients; anterior mitral line, 32 patients; posterior mitral line, 45 patients; cavotricuspid isthmus line, 38 patients). First-pass isolation and primary efficacy end point were 96.2% (roof line, 100%; inferior line, 100%; anterior mitral line, 96.9%; posterior mitral line, 84.4%; cavotricuspid isthmus, 92.1%) and 100%, respectively. We had 2 (1.5%) major complications: 1 ST-segment elevation at the inferolateral leads requiring intracoronary administration of nitrate and 1 complete atrioventricular block.

CONCLUSION

Catheter ablation with a novel 9-mm lattice-tip catheter confirmed high efficacy and safety in a real-world scenario.

Multielectrode catheter-based pulsed electric field vs. cryoballoon for atrial fibrillation ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is an innovative technology recently adopted for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Preclinical and clinical studies have reported a remarkable safety profile, as a result of its tissue-specific effect targeting cardiomyocytes and sparing adjacent tissues. Single-shot pentaspline system was the first PFA device to receive regulatory approval. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of PFA with the single-shot pentaspline system vs. currently available second-/third-/fourth-generation cryoballoon ablation (CRYO) technologies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We systematically searched electronic databases for studies focusing on AF ablation employing the PFA single-shot pentaspline system or second-/third-/fourth-generation CRYO technologies. The primary endpoints were acute procedural success assessed on a vein and patient basis. Safety endpoints included overall periprocedural complications and major periprocedural complications. We also compared procedural, fluoroscopy times, and freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATs) at follow-up (secondary endpoints). Twenty and 70 studies were included for PFA and CRYO, respectively. Pulsed field ablation demonstrated greater acute procedural success on a vein basis (99.9% vs. 99.1%; P < 0.001), as well as per patient (99.5% vs. 98.4%; P < 0.001). Pulsed field ablation yielded lower overall periprocedural complications (3.1% vs. 5.6%; P < 0.001), shorter procedural time (75.9 min vs. 105.6 min; P < 0.001), and fluoroscopy time (14.2 min vs. 18.9 min; P < 0.001) compared with CRYO. No differences were found for major periprocedural complications (1.2% vs. 1.0%; P = 0.46) and freedom from ATs at 1 year (82.3% vs. 80.3%; log-rank P = 0.61).

CONCLUSION

Pulsed field ablation contributed to higher acute procedural success and safety compared with CRYO. No statistically significant differences in AT recurrence at 1-year follow-up were observed.

Surgical management of atrioesophageal fistula after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A French nationwide study

Objective

The study objective was to assess the efficacity of different surgical strategies for atrioesophageal fistula after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Methods

Between January 2010 and April 2023, all patients with a diagnosis of atrioesophageal fistula or pericardo-esophageal fistula after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation were analyzed retrospectively from the French database EPITHOR. Patients without surgical management were excluded.

Results

Eighteen patients were included, 15 with atrioesophageal fistula and 3 with pericardo-esophageal fistula. Median follow-up was 89.5 days with an overall survival of 50%. Five patients underwent esophageal stenting, 2 as a bridge-to-esophagectomy with 50% of survival and 3 in association with esophagus and left atrial direct repair with 66% survival. Primary esophageal repair with flap coverage was performed in 8 patients with 25% survival, most of them with sepsis and neurological failure. Seven patients had an esophagectomy with 71% survival, only 2 of them having a neurological failure. Among them, 5 patients underwent a restorative surgery and are still alive. Four patients had a retrosternal colon interposition, and 1 patient had an esogastric anastomosis. Risk factors for death were neurological failure (hazard ratio [HR], 4.91, 95% CI, 0.95-25.22; P = .0057) in univariate analysis and sepsis (HR, 6.25, 95% CI, 1.17-33.3; P = .032) in multivariate analysis. Esophagectomy tended to offer a survival benefit (HR, 0.163, 95% CI, 0.019-1.340; P = .092). The use of cardiopulmonary bypass did not significantly impact survival (HR, 1.953, 95% CI, 0.392-9.719; P = .413).

Conclusions

Aggressive surgical strategies for managing atrioesophageal fistula are mandatory to offer the best chance of survival.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

Mechanisms of action behind the protective effects of proactive esophageal cooling during radiofrequency catheter ablation in the left atrium

Proactive esophageal cooling for the purpose of reducing the likelihood of ablation-related esophageal injury resulting from radiofrequency (RF) cardiac ablation procedures is increasingly being used and has been Food and Drug Administration cleared as a protective strategy during left atrial RF ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. In this review, we examine the evidence supporting the use of proactive esophageal cooling and the potential mechanisms of action that reduce the likelihood of atrioesophageal fistula (AEF) formation. Although the pathophysiology behind AEF formation after thermal injury from RF ablation is not well studied, a robust literature on fistula formation in other conditions (eg, Crohn disease, cancer, and trauma) exists and the relationship to AEF formation is investigated in this review. Likewise, we examine the abundant data in the surgical literature on burn and thermal injury progression as well as the acute and chronic mitigating effects of cooling. We discuss the relationship of these data and maladaptive healing mechanisms to the well-recognized postablation pathophysiological effects after RF ablation. Finally, we review additional important considerations such as patient selection, clinical workflow, and implementation strategies for proactive esophageal cooling.

Self-sealing atrio-oesophageal fistula as a complication of pulmonary vein isolation: a case report

Background

Atrio-oesophageal fistulas (AEFs) are an uncommon complication of pulmonary vein ablation, and its diagnosis is challenging. Multidisciplinary interventions and diagnostic imaging are usually required and may play a role in the initial assessment.

Case summary

A 69-year-old female with atrial fibrillation who had undergone recent pulmonary vein ablation consulted with unspecific symptoms and sudden hemiparesis. Brain imaging showed pneumocephalus and acute infarcts. Chest computed tomography (CT) was highly suspicious for AEF. Surgical exploration revealed a swollen mediastinum attached to the right inferior pulmonary vein.

Discussion

Non-specific symptoms after pulmonary vein ablation should prompt the suspicion of complications. In the presence of fever or neurological deficit, AEF must be suspected and assessed with a contrast-enhanced chest CT, which has become the gold standard. In brain imaging, pneumocephalus and multiple punctate acute infarcts might also indicate the presence of this complication.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Posterior wall isolation via a multi-electrode radiofrequency balloon catheter: feasibility, technical considerations, endoscopic findings and comparison with cryoballoon technologies

BACKGROUND

Posterior wall (PW) isolation is an important adjunctive ablation target in patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Traditionally performed with point-by-point radiofrequency (RF) ablation, PW isolation has also been performed with different cryoballoon technologies. We aimed at assessing the feasibility of PW isolation with the novel RF balloon catheter Heliostar™ (Biosense Webster, CA, USA).

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 32 consecutive patients with persistent AF scheduled for first-time ablation with the Heliostar™ device. Procedural data were compared with those from 96 consecutive persistent AF patients undergoing pulmonary vein (PV) plus PW isolation with a cryoballoon device. The ratio RF balloon/cryoballoon was 1:3 for each operator involved in the study, aiming at avoiding any imbalance related to different experience.

RESULTS

Single-shot PV isolation was documented in a significantly higher number of cases with the RF balloon technology compared to cryoballoon ablation (89.8% vs. 81.0%; p = 0.02, respectively). PW isolation was achieved with a similar number of balloon applications between the two groups (11 ± 4 with the RF balloon versus 11 ± 2 with the cryoballoon; p = 0.16), but in a significantly shorter time among RF balloon patients (228 ± 72 s versus 1274 ± 277 s with cryoballoon; p < 0.001). Primary safety endpoint occurred in none of the RF balloon patients versus 5 (5.2%) patients in the cryoballoon group (p = 0.33). Primary efficacy endpoint was achieved in all (100%) RF balloon patients versus 93 (96.9%) cryoballoon ones (p = 0.57). Oesophageal endoscopy did not show any signs of thermal lesions in RF balloon patients with luminal temperature rise.

CONCLUSIONS

RF balloon-based PW isolation was safe and promoted shorter procedure times compared to similar cryoballoon-based ablation procedures.

Atrio-oesophageal fistula after radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation misinterpreted as COVID-19 infection

Awareness of the various clinical manifestations and diagnostic pitfalls in patients with atrio-oesophageal fistula is necessary among healthcare professionals.

Pulsed electric field, cryoballoon, and radiofrequency for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation: a propensity score-matched comparison

AIMS

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a novel, non-thermal energy source to selectively ablate cardiac tissue. We describe a multicentre experience on pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) via the pentaspline Farapulse™ PFA system vs. thermal-based technologies in a propensity score-matched population of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Propensity score matching was adopted to compare PVI-only ablation outcomes via the Farawave™ system (Group PFA), cryoballoon (Group CRYO), or focal radiofrequency (Group RF) (PFA:CRYO:RF ratio = 1:2:2). Among 1572 (mean age: 62.4 ± 11.3 years; 42.5% females) PAF patients undergoing first time PVI with either PFA (n = 174), CRYO (n = 655), or RF (n = 743), propensity score matching yielded 174 PFA, 348 CRYO, and 348 RF patients. First-pass isolation was achieved in 98.8% of pulmonary veins (PVs) with PFA, 81.5% with CRYO, and 73.1% with RF (P < 0.001). Procedural and dwell times were significantly shorter with PFA, whereas the availability of a 3D mapping system led to a significant reduction in X-ray exposure with RF. Overall complication rates were 3.4% (n = 6) with PFA, 8.6% (n = 30) with CRYO, and 5.5% (n = 19) with RF (P = 0.052). The 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimated freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia was 79.3% with PFA, 74.7% with CRYO, and 72.4% with RF (log-rank P-value: 0.24). Among 145 repeat ablation procedures, PV reconnection rate was 19.1% after PFA, 27.5% after CRYO, and 34.8% after RF (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Pulsed field ablation contributed to significantly shorter procedural times. Follow-up data showed a similar arrhythmia freedom, although a higher rate of PV reconnection was documented in post-CRYO and post-RF redo procedures.

Atrioesophageal Fistula Rates Before and After Adoption of Active Esophageal Cooling During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

BACKGROUND

Active esophageal cooling reduces the incidence of endoscopically identified severe esophageal lesions during radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of the left atrium for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. A formal analysis of the atrioesophageal fistula (AEF) rate with active esophageal cooling has not previously been performed.

OBJECTIVES

The authors aimed to compare AEF rates before and after the adoption of active esophageal cooling.

METHODS

This institutional review board (IRB)-approved study was a prospective analysis of retrospective data, designed before collecting and analyzing the real-world data. The number of AEFs occurring in equivalent time frames before and after adoption of cooling using a dedicated esophageal cooling device (ensoETM, Attune Medical) were quantified across 25 prespecified hospital systems. AEF rates were then compared using generalized estimating equations robust to cluster correlation.

RESULTS

A total of 14,224 patients received active esophageal cooling during RF ablation across the 25 hospital systems, which included a total of 30 separate hospitals. In the time frames before adoption of active cooling, a total of 10,962 patients received primarily luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring during their RF ablations. In the preadoption cohort, a total of 16 AEFs occurred, for an AEF rate of 0.146%, in line with other published estimates for procedures using LET monitoring. In the postadoption cohort, no AEFs were found in the prespecified sites, yielding an AEF rate of 0% (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Adoption of active esophageal cooling during RF ablation of the left atrium for the treatment of atrial fibrillation was associated with a significant reduction in AEF rate.

Improved 1-year outcomes after active cooling during left atrial radiofrequency ablation

BACKGROUND

Active esophageal cooling during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with radiofrequency (RF) ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasingly being utilized to reduce esophageal injury and atrioesophageal fistula formation. Randomized controlled data also show trends towards increased freedom from AF when using active cooling. This study aimed to compare 1-year arrhythmia recurrence rates between patients treated with luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring versus active esophageal cooling during left atrial ablation.

METHOD

Data from two healthcare systems (including 3 hospitals and 4 electrophysiologists) were reviewed for patient rhythm status at 1-year follow-up after receiving PVI for the treatment of AF. Results were compared between patients receiving active esophageal cooling (ensoETM, Attune Medical, Chicago, IL) and those treated with traditional LET monitoring using Kaplan-Meier estimates.

RESULTS

A total of 513 patients were reviewed; 253 received LET monitoring using either single or multi-sensor temperature probes; and 260 received active cooling. The mean age was 66.8 (SD ± 10) years, and 36.8% were female. Arrhythmias were 60.1% paroxysmal AF, 34.3% persistent AF, and 5.6% long-standing persistent AF, with no significant difference between groups. At 1-year follow-up, KM estimates for freedom from AF were 58.2% for LET-monitored patients and 72.2% for actively cooled patients, for an absolute increase in freedom from AF of 14% with active esophageal cooling (p = .03). Adjustment for the confounders of patient age, gender, type of AF, and operator with an inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox proportional hazards model yielded a hazard ratio of 0.6 for the effect of cooling on AF recurrence (p = 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

In this first study to date of the association between esophageal protection strategy and long-term efficacy of left atrial RF ablation, a clinically and statistically significant improvement in freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 1 year was found in patients treated with active esophageal cooling when compared to patients who received LET monitoring. More rigorous prospective studies or randomized studies are required to validate the findings of the current study.

A case report of rapid diagnosis of atrial-oesophageal fistula by transthoracic echocardiogram with agitated saline injection

Background

Catheter ablation is a common treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Atrial-oesophageal fistula (AOF) is a rare yet fatal complication of catheter ablation. Chest computed tomography (CT) is the diagnostic modality of choice but may be undiagnostic in up to 24% of cases.

Case summary

We present the case of a 61-year-old male who presented with pleuritic chest pain, hypotension, fever, and coffee-ground emesis 20 days after cryoablation for AF. His chest CT was undiagnostic. Atrial-oesophageal fistula was diagnosed by injecting agitated saline into the nasogastric tube during a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) that showed bubbles in the left atrium and ventricle.

Discussion

In the case presented, as often happens, the diagnosis of AOF was delayed for several days, during which the patient presented with septic shock and concomitant multiorgan failure. The high mortality rate associated with AOF is partially attributable to delayed diagnosis. As prompt surgical intervention offers the best chance of survival, a high level of suspicion is of the utmost importance. We suggest contrast-enhanced TTE as a potential diagnostic tool when a rapid and definitive diagnosis is crucial and CT is inconclusive. Since this procedure is not without risk, proper risk consideration and management are necessary.

Rationale and study design of the Italian Registry in the setting of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation with Rivaroxaban - IRIS

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) is used routinely to establish rhythm control. There is mounting evidence that CA procedures should be performed during continuous oral anticoagulation and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are considered the first anticoagulation strategy. Few real-life data are now available and even less in the Italian panorama.

METHODS

IRIS is an Italian multicenter, non-interventional, prospective study which will be enrolled consecutive AF patients eligible for CA and treated with Rivaroxaban; patients in treatment with Rivaroxaban proceeded directly to CA while Rivaroxaban-naive patients were scheduled for CA after 4 weeks of uninterrupted anticoagulation unless the exclusion of atrial thrombi. Rivaroxaban was uninterrupted or shortly uninterrupted (<24 hours) prior CA, in line with routinely practice of each operator. Patients will be followed on continuous anticoagulation for 1 month after the ablation. The primary efficacy outcome is the cumulative incidence of all-cause death and systemic embolism while the primary safety outcome is the incidence of major bleeding events. The secondary outcomes are represented by non-major bleeding events. All events must be occurred within the first 30 days after the procedure.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty patients are expected to be enrolled and the study is estimated to be completed by the end of 2022. Up to now 56 patients have been enrolled.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first large Italian prospective study on the management of Rivaroxaban in patients undergoing CA of AF. It aims to depict a comprehensive view of anticoagulation strategy prior CA in several Italian electrophysiology labs.

Gastrointestinal Bleeding Caused by Atrioesophageal Fistula Secondary to Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

We present the case of a patient with upper gastrointestinal bleeding caused by an atrioesophageal fistula secondary to radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of refractory atrial fibrillation. Atrioesophageal fistula is a rare but serious complication. The endoscopic treatment is not established in the case of vascular-enteric fistulas and is still a challenge for endoscopists, which requires in most cases a multidisciplinary approach.

Procedural time reduction associated with active esophageal cooling during pulmonary vein isolation

BACKGROUND

Active esophageal cooling is increasingly utilized as an alternative to luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring for protection against thermal injury during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) when treating atrial fibrillation (AF). Published data demonstrate the efficacy of active cooling in reducing thermal injury, but impacts on procedural efficiency are not as well characterized. LET monitoring compels pauses in ablation due to heat stacking and temperature overheating alarms that in turn delay progress of the PVI procedure, whereas active esophageal cooling allows avoidance of this phenomenon. Our objective was to measure the change in PVI procedure duration after implementation of active esophageal cooling as a protective measure against esophageal injury.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review under IRB approval of patients with AF undergoing PVI between January 2018 and February 2020. For each patient, we recorded age, gender, and total procedure time. We then compared procedure times before and after the implementation of active esophageal cooling as a replacement for LET monitoring.

RESULTS

A total of 373 patients received PVI over the study period. LET monitoring using a multi-sensor probe was performed in 198 patients, and active esophageal cooling using a dedicated device was performed in 175 patients. Patient characteristics did not significantly differ between groups (mean age of 67 years, and gender 37.4% female). Mean procedure time was 146 ± 51 min in the LET-monitored patients, and 110 ± 39 min in the actively cooled patients, representing a reduction of 36 min, or 24.7% of total procedure time (p < .001). Median procedure time was 141 [IQR 104 to 174] min in the LET-monitored patients and 100 [IQR 84 to 122] min in the actively cooled patients, for a reduction of 41 min, or 29.1% of total procedure time (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of active esophageal cooling for protection against esophageal injury during PVI was associated with a significantly large reduction in procedure duration.

Acquired atrioesophageal fistula: Need it be lethal? Sizing up the problem, diagnostic modalities, and best management

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY

An atrioesophageal fistula is a devastating complication of ablation for atrial fibrillation. For the surgeon facing this dreaded complication, it may be a 'once in a lifetime' case. This review aims to describe the clinical problem and evaluate the outcome of different surgical techniques to start guiding cardiothoracic surgeons toward those which offer the best chance of survival.

METHODS

An electronic search retrieved 125 articles containing 195 cases of atrioesophageal fistula secondary to atrial fibrillation ablation. Reports of pericardio-esophageal or mediastino-esophageal fistula were excluded.

RESULTS

The median age was 61 and 143 (73%) cases occurred in males. Fever (n = 147; 75%) and neurological dysfunction (n = 151; 77%) were the most common symptoms. The median time from ablation to symptom onset was 21 days (interquartile range: 12-28). The most sensitive thoracic imaging modality was computed tomography (n = 135/153; 90%). Immediate deterioration occurred during 11/58 (19%) oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopies. Mortality was lower in patients who had surgery (39%) compared with endoscopic intervention (94%) or conservative management (97%). Patients who had atrial repair combined with esophageal repair or oesophagectomy were more likely to survive than those who had atrial repair alone (OR 6.97; p < .001). Isolation of the esophageal aspect of the fistula conferred an additional survival benefit (OR 5.85; p = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Fever, neurological symptoms, and chest pain in the context of recent ablation should prompt immediate evaluation. Urgent CT thorax should be arranged and repeated if initially unremarkable. Esophageal instrumentation should be avoided due to the risk of catastrophic air embolism or massive hemorrhage. The best way forward is emergency surgical repair; the combination which offers the best survival benefit is atrial repair combined with esophageal surgery and isolation of the esophageal aspect of the fistula.

Active esophageal cooling during radiofrequency ablation of the left atrium: data review and update

INTRODUCTION

Radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the left atrium of the heart is increasingly used to treat atrial fibrillation (AF). Unfortunately, inadvertent thermal injury to the esophagus can occur during this procedure, potentially creating an atrioesophageal fistula (AEF) which is 80% fatal. The ensoETM (Attune Medical, Chicago, IL), is an esophageal cooling device that has been shown to reduce thermal injury to the esophagus during RF ablation.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes growing evidence related to active esophageal cooling during RF ablation for the treatment of AF. The review presents data demonstrating improved outcomes related to patient safety and procedural efficiency and suggests directions for future research.

EXPERT OPINION

The use of active esophageal cooling during RF ablation reduces esophageal injury, reduces or eliminates fluoroscopy requirements, reduces procedure duration and post-operative pain, and increases long-term freedom from arrhythmia. These effects in turn increase patient same-day discharge rates, decrease operator cognitive load, and reduce cost. These findings are likely to further accelerate the adoption of active esophageal cooling.

Catheter Ablation versus Medical Therapy of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Heart Failure: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) often coexist and synergistically contribute to an increased risk of hospitalization, stroke, and mortality. Objective: To compare the efficacy of catheter ablation (CA) versus medical therapy (MT) in HF patients with AF. Methods: Electronic databases were queried for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of CA versus MT of AF in patients with HF. Risk ratios (RRs), mean differences (MDs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were measured using the Mantel−Haenszel method. Results: A total of nine RCTs enrolling 2155 patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared to MT, CA led to a significant reduction in the composite of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization (24.6% vs. 37.1%; RR: 0.65 (95% CI: 0.53−0.80); p < 0.0001), all-cause mortality (8.8% vs. 13.6%; RR: 0.65 (95% CI: 0.51−0.82); p = 0.0005), HF hospitalization (15.4% vs. 22.4%; (RR: 0.67 (95% CI: 0.54−0.82); p = 0.0001), AF recurrence (31.8% vs. 77.0%; RR: 0.36 (95% CI: 0.24−0.54); p < 0.0001), and cardiovascular (CV) death (4.9% vs. 8.4%; RR: 0.58 (95% CI: 0.39−0.86); p = 0.007). CA improved the left ventricular ejection fraction (MD:4.76% (95% CI: 2.35−7.18); p = 0.0001), 6 min walk test (MD: 20.48 m (95% CI: 10.83−30.14); p < 0.0001), peak oxygen consumption (MD: 3.1 2mL/kg/min (95% CI: 1.01−5.22); p = 0.004), Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire score (MD: −6.98 (95% CI: −12−03, −1.93); p = 0.007), and brain natriuretic peptide levels (MD:−133.94 pg/mL (95% CI: −197.33, −70.55); p < 0.0001). Conclusions: In HF patients, AF catheter ablation was superior to MT in reducing CV and all-cause mortality. Further significant benefits occurred within the ablation group in terms of HF hospitalizations, AF recurrences, the systolic function, exercise capacity, and quality of life.

Proactive esophageal cooling protects against thermal insults during high-power short-duration radiofrequency cardiac ablation

BACKGROUND

Proactive cooling with a novel cooling device has been shown to reduce endoscopically identified thermal injury during radiofrequency (RF) ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation using medium power settings. We aimed to evaluate the effects of proactive cooling during high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation.

METHODS

A computer model accounting for the left atrium (1.5 mm thickness) and esophagus including the active cooling device was created. We used the Arrhenius equation to estimate the esophageal thermal damage during 50 W/ 10 s and 90 W/ 4 s RF ablations.

RESULTS

With proactive esophageal cooling in place, temperatures in the esophageal tissue were significantly reduced from control conditions without cooling, and the resulting percentage of damage to the esophageal wall was reduced around 50%, restricting damage to the epi-esophageal region and consequently sparing the remainder of the esophageal tissue, including the mucosal surface. Lesions in the atrial wall remained transmural despite cooling, and maximum width barely changed (<0.8 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

Proactive esophageal cooling significantly reduces temperatures and the resulting fraction of damage in the esophagus during HPSD ablation. These findings offer a mechanistic rationale explaining the high degree of safety encountered to date using proactive esophageal cooling, and further underscore the fact that temperature monitoring is inadequate to avoid thermal damage to the esophagus.