High-risk features and predictors of unexplained syncope in the young SCD-SOS cohort

Clinical applications of heart rhythm monitoring tools in symptomatic patients and for screening in high-risk groups

Recent technological advances have facilitated and diversified the options available for the diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmias. Ranging from simple resting or exercise electrocardiograms to more sophisticated and expensive smartphones and implantable cardiac monitors. These tests and devices may be used for varying periods of time depending on symptom frequency. The choice of the most appropriate heart rhythm test should be guided by clinical evaluation and optimized following accurate characterization of underlying symptoms, 'red flags', risk factors, and consideration of cost-effectiveness of the different tests. This review provides evidence-based guidance for assessing suspected arrhythmia in patients who present with symptoms or in the context of screening, such as atrial fibrillation or advanced conduction disturbances following transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high-risk groups. This is intended to help clinicians choose the most appropriate diagnostic tool to facilitate the management of patients with suspected arrhythmias.

Key characteristics for effective acute pulmonary vein isolation when using a novel cryoballoon technology: insights from the CHARISMA registry

PURPOSE

A new cryoballoon (CB) technology (POLARx™; Boston Scientific) for pulmonary vein (PV) isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has recently been introduced. The aim of this study was to evaluate procedural and biophysical parameters resulting in acute PV isolation when using this new CB.

METHODS

We assessed the first 69 consecutive patients indicated for AF ablation who underwent PV isolation by means of a novel CB system. Procedural metrics were prospectively recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 274 PVs were targeted in 69 patients. PV isolation was achieved in all patients by means of cryoablation alone. The median time to isolation (TTI) was 44 [31-68] s (median temperature at TTI =  - 49 [- 53 to - 41] °C). The median duration of CB ablation was 180 [180 to 240] s. The median nadir temperature was - 56.0 [- 61 to - 52] °C, and the median thaw time to 0 °C was 18 [15-21] s. The median grade of PV occlusion was 4 [3 to 4]. On the basis of ROC analysis, we defined the following cut-off values for acute PV isolation: - 56 °C for nadir temperature (sensitivity = 73.3%, specificity = 64.6%, AUC = 0.716; positive predictive value = 88.1%), 30 s for TTT (60.2%, 53.3%, 0.578; 79.7%), thaw time > 17 s (65.3%, 70.0%, 0.709; 86.9%), and grade of PV occlusion = 4 (79.4%, 66.7%, 0.738; 88.5%). No major procedure-related adverse events were observed at 30-day post-procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

The new POLARx™ CB appears to be effective and safe. A nadir temperature of - 56 °C, a thaw time to 0 °C ≥ 17 s, and complete PV occlusion were the best predictors of acute PV isolation.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Catheter Ablation of Arrhythmias with a High-Density Mapping System in Real-World Practice (CHARISMA). URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/Identifier : NCT03793998. Registration date: January 4, 2019.