Low dose-eplerenone treatment decreases aortic stiffness in patients with resistant hypertension

Chronic esaxerenone treatment improves vascular function and lowers peripheral arterial stiffness in patients with idiopathic hyperaldosteronism

OBJECTIVE

Primary aldosteronism is one of the most common types of secondary endocrine hypertension. Treatment with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists is recommended for bilateral idiopathic hyperaldosteronism (IHA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of esaxerenone, a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist with high mineralocorticoid receptor-binding specificity, on vascular function and peripheral arterial stiffness in patients with IHA.

METHODS

This study was a single-center, observational prospective cohort study. Forty-four patients with IHA (18 men and 26 women; 52 ± 11 years) were enrolled from Hiroshima University Hospital. Vascular function, including flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) and nitroglycerine-induced vasodilation (NID) and peripheral arterial stiffness, including brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) and brachial artery intima-media thickness (bIMT) were measured before and after 12 weeks of treatment with esaxerenone.

RESULTS

Esaxerenone treatment increased FMD (3.1 ± 2.0% to 5.7 ± 2.2%, P < 0.01) and NID (10.7 ± 3.8% to 15.7 ± 6.2%, P < 0.01) and decreased baPWV (1605 ± 263 to 1428 ± 241 cm/s, P < 0.01), while esaxerenone treatment did not significantly alter bIMT. The changes in FMD and NID posttreatment with esaxerenone were significantly correlated with the changes in plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) and plasma renin activity (PRA). The change in baPWV was significantly correlated with the changes in PRA, aldosterone-to-renin ratio, and systolic blood pressure.

CONCLUSION

Esaxerenone improved vascular function and peripheral arterial stiffness in patients with IHA. These findings suggest aldosterone inhibition is a potential mechanism governing improvement in cardiovascular health.

Early Cardiac Rehabilitation Improves Carotid Arterial Stiffness in Patients with Myocardial Infarction

Background

Little is known about the effect of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on carotid arterial stiffness (CAS) in patients with myocardial infarction (MI).

Patients and Methods

Rehabilitation group (B) included 90 patients with MI subjected to CR, control group (K) consisted of 30 patients with MI not participating in CR, and healthy group comprised 38 persons without cardiovascular risk factors. CAS was determined using echo-tracking before and after CR.

Results

At baseline, patients with MI (B+K) presented with significantly higher mean values of CAS parameters: beta-stiffness index (7.1 vs 6.4, p = 0.004), Peterson's elastic modulus (96 kPa vs 77 kPa, p < 0.001) and PWV-beta (6.1 m/s vs 5.2 m/s, p < 0.001) than healthy persons. Age (beta: r = 0.242, p = 0.008; EP: r = 0.250, p = 0.006; PWV-beta: r = 0.224, p = 0.014) and blood pressure: SBP (EP: r = 0.388, PWV-beta: r = 0.360), DBP (AC: r = 0.225) and PP (PWV-beta: r = 0.221) correlated positively with the initial parameters of CAS. Beta-stiffness index (Rho=-0.26, p = 0.04) and PWV-beta (Rho = 0.29, p = 0.03) correlated inversely with peak exercise capacity expressed in METs. After CR, mean values of beta-stiffness index (6.2 vs 7.1, p = 0.016), EP (78 kPa vs 101 kPa, p = 0.001) and PWV-beta (5.4 m/s vs 6.2 m/s, p = 0.001) in group B were significantly lower than in group K. In group B, CAS parameters decreased significantly after CR. Univariate analysis demonstrated that the likelihood of an improvement in CAS after CR was significantly higher in patients with baseline systolic blood pressure <120 mm Hg (OR = 2.74, p = 0.009) and left ventricular ejection fraction <43% (OR = 5.05, p = 0.005).

Conclusion

In patients with MI, CR exerted a beneficial effect on CAS parameters. The improvement in CAS was predicted by lower SBP and LVEF at baseline.

Comparative effect of antihypertensive drugs in improving arterial stiffness in adults with hypertension (RIGIPREV study). A network meta-analysis

Aims: To synthesize and evaluate the available scientific evidence on the efficacy of antihypertensive drugs on arterial stiffness in patients with hypertension by using a network meta-analysis approach. Methods: A systematic search of the MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, and Web of Science databases was conducted to identify experimental studies addressing the effect of different antihypertensive drugs on arterial stiffness parameters (pulse wave velocity [PWV] and augmentation index [AIx]) in adults with hypertension. Comparative evaluation of the effect of antihypertensive drugs was performed by conducting a standard pairwise meta-analysis and a network meta-analysis for direct and indirect comparisons between antihypertensive drugs and placebo/other antihypertensive drugs. Analyses were performed including studies of any duration and only studies longer than 6 months length. Results: Seventy-six studies were included in the main analysis and considering only studies longer than 6 months length, thiazide diuretics, ACEIs, ARBs, the ACEI/ARB combination, the ACEI/CCB combination, and the ARB/CCB combination showed a higher effect on reducing PWV, and ACEIs and ARBs on reducing AIx. Conclusion: Our research provides evidence that antihypertensive medications are an effective way to treat arterial stiffness in adults with hypertension. Based on our findings, patients with hypertension who have greater levels of arterial stiffness may benefit from using thiazide diuretics, ACEIs, ARBs, the ACEI/ARB combination, the ACEI/CCB combination, and the ARB/CCB combination. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42021276360).

Implication of MR Activity in Posttreatment Arterial Stiffness Reversal in Patients With Primary Aldosteronism

CONTEXT

Primary aldosteronism (PA) patients have a higher degree of arterial stiffness, which can be reversed after adrenalectomy.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare the reversal of arterial stiffness between surgically and medically treated PA patients and to identify the predictors of effective medical treatment.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 445 PA patients and collected data on baseline clinical characteristics, biochemistry, blood pressure, and pulse wave velocity (PWV) before treatment and 12 months after treatment. In the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA)-treated patients, the relationship between the change in PWV after 1 year (ΔPWV) and posttreatment renin activity was explored using the restricted cubic spline (RCS) method.

RESULTS

Of the 445 enrolled PA patients, 255 received adrenalectomy (group 1) and 190 received MRAs. In the RCS model, posttreatment plasma renin activity (PRA) 1.5 ng/mL/h was the best cutoff value. Therefore, we divided the MRA-treated patients into 2 groups: those with suppressed PRA (< 1.5 ng/mL/h, group 2), and those with unsuppressed PRA (≥ 1.5 ng/mL/h, group 3). Only group 1 and group 3 patients had a statistically significant improvement in PWV after treatment (both P < .001), whereas no significant improvement was noted in group 2 after treatment (P = .151). In analysis of variance and post hoc analysis, group 2 had a significantly lower ΔPWV than group 1 (P = .007) and group 3 (P = .031). Multivariable regression analysis of the MRA-treated PA patients identified log-transformed posttreatment PRA, age, and baseline PWV as independent factors correlated with ΔPWV.

CONCLUSION

The reversal of arterial stiffness was found in PA patients receiving adrenalectomy and in medically treated PA patients with unsuppressed PRA.

Primary Aldosteronism and the Role of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists for the Heart and Kidneys

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common cause of secondary hypertension but is frequently underrecognized and undertreated. Patients with PA are at a markedly increased risk for target organ damage to the heart and kidneys. While patients with unilateral PA can be treated surgically, many patients with PA are not eligible or willing to undergo surgery. Steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are highly effective for treating PA and reducing the risk of target organ damage. However, steroidal MRAs are often underprescribed and can be poorly tolerated by some patients due to side effects. Nonsteroidal MRAs reduce adverse renal and cardiovascular outcomes among patients with diabetic kidney disease and are bettertolerated than steroidal MRAs. While their blood pressure-lowering effects remain unclear, these agents may have a potential role in reducing target organ damage in patients with PA.

Cardiovascular-renal protective effect and molecular mechanism of finerenone in type 2 diabetic mellitus

Chronic kidney diseases (CKD) and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the main complications in type 2 diabetic mellitus (T2DM), increasing the risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Current therapeutic strategies that delay the progression of CKD and the development of CVD include angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB), sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) and GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA). In the progression of CKD and CVD, mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) overactivation leads to inflammation and fibrosis in the heart, kidney and vascular system, making mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) as a promising therapeutic option in T2DM with CKD and CVD. Finerenone is the third generation highly selective non-steroidal MRAs. It significantly reduces the risk of cardiovascular and renal complications. Finerenone also improves the cardiovascular-renal outcomes in T2DM patients with CKD and/or chronic heart failure (CHF). It is safer and more effective than the first- and second-generation MRAs due to its higher selectivity and specificity, resulting in a lower incidence of adverse effects including hyperkalemia, renal insufficiency and androgen-like effects. Finerenone shows potent effect on improving the outcomes of CHF, refractory hypertension, and diabetic nephropathy. Recently studies have shown that finerenone may have potential therapeutic effect on diabetic retinopathy, primary aldosteronism, atrial fibrillation, pulmonary hypertension and so on. In this review, we discuss the characteristics of finerenone, the new third-generation MRA, and compared with the first- and second-generation steroidal MRAs and other nonsteroidal MRAs. We also focus on its safety and efficacy of clinical application on CKD with T2DM patients. We hope to provide new insights for the clinical application and therapeutic prospect.

Efficacy and Safety of Eplerenone for Treating Chronic Kidney Disease: A Meta-Analysis

Background

In recent years, a large amount of clinical evidence and animal experiments have demonstrated the unique advantages of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) for treating chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Aims

Accordingly, the present study aimed to systematically assess the second-generation selective MRAs eplerenone's safety and effectiveness for treating CKD.

Methods

Four databases (PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) correlated with eplerenone for treating CKD up to September 21, 2022. By complying with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, literature screening, and data extraction were conducted.

Results

A total of 19 randomized controlled articles involving 4501 cases were covered. As suggested from the meta-analysis, significant differences were reported with the 24-h urine protein (MD = -42.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -76.72 to -7.73, P = 0.02), urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) (MD = -23.57, 95% CI = -29.28 to -17.86, P < 0.00001), the systolic blood pressure (SBP) (MD = -2.73, 95% CI = -4.86 to -0.59, P = 0.01), and eGFR (MD = -1.56, 95% CI = -2.78 to -0.34, P = 0.01) in the subgroup of eplerenone vs placebo. The subgroups of eplerenone vs placebo (MD = 0.13, 95% CI = 0.07 to 0.18, P < 0.00001) and eplerenone vs thiazide diuretic (MD = 0.18, 95% CI = 0.13 to 0.23, P < 0.00001) showed the significantly increased potassium levels. However, no statistical significance was reported between the eplerenone treatment groups and the control in the effect exerted by serum creatinine (MD=0.03, 95% CI = -0.01 to 0.07, P = 0.12) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (MD = 0.11, 95% CI = -0.41 to 0.63, P = 0.68). Furthermore, significant risks of hyperkalemia were reported in the eplerenone group (K⁺ ≥ 5.5 mmol/l, RR = 1.70, 95%CI = 1.35 to 2.13, P=<0.00001; K+≥6.0 mmol/l, RR = 1.61, 95% CIs = 1.06 to 2.44, P = 0.02), respectively.

Conclusions

Eplerenone has beneficial effects on CKD by reducing urinary protein and the systolic blood pressure, but it also elevates the risk of hyperkalemia.

Atherosclerotic Burden and Arterial Stiffness are Not Increased in Patients with Milder Forms of Primary Aldosteronism Compared to Patients with Essential Hypertension

Patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) are at increased cardiovascular risk, compared to patients with essential hypertension (EH). Cardiovascular damage could depend on PA phenotype, potentially being lower in milder forms of PA. Our aim was to assess atherosclerotic burden and arterial stiffness in 88 prospectively recruited patients, including 44 patients with mild PA and EH respectively. All patients underwent a structured study program, including measurements of ankle-brachial index, oscillometric measurement of central pulse wave velocity (cPWV) and vascular ultrasound examination of the supraaortic arteries, the abdominal aorta, and the femoropopliteal arteries. A plaque score was calculated to estimate atherosclerotic burden for each patient. This is a prospective case-control study set at a tertiary care hospital. Patients with PA and EH matched well for age, gender, blood pressure, BMI, and cardiovascular risk factors such as diabetes mellitus and smoking status. Common carotid intima-media thickness (0.77 vs. 0.75 mm; p=0.997) and cPWV (7.2 vs. 7.1 m/s; p=0.372) were comparable between patients with PA and EH. The atherosclerotic burden, as expressed by the plaque score, did not differ between the two groups (p=0.159). However, after initiation of treatment cPWV was significantly decreased in patients with PA (p=0.017). This study shows that subclinical atherosclerotic burden and arterial stiffness in patients with milder forms of PA is comparable to patients with EH. Nevertheless, specific treatment for PA significantly improved cPWV, which argues for a more liberal use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in patients with arterial hypertension.

Effect of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Blockade on Arterial Stiffness and Endothelial Function: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Although numerous studies have confirmed the beneficial effects of pharmacological therapy for arterial stiffness and endothelial dysfunction, which are predictors/therapeutic targets for cardiovascular diseases, only a few overall quantitative evaluations of MRAs (mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists) exist. We searched PubMed and Cochrane CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) for randomized trials evaluating MRA effects on arterial stiffness measured by pulse wave velocity (PWV) or augmentation index and endothelial function measured by flow-mediated dilation. Data from the included trials were pooled by using random-effects meta-analysis of the weighted mean difference (MD) between the comparator groups. The primary outcome was the MD of PWV. In 11 trials including 515 patients, the MRA treatment reduced the PWV when compared with control (MD, -0.75 m/s [95% CI, -1.12 to -0.39], P<0.00001), without heterogeneity. There were comparable effects of MRA on carotid-femoral PWV and those on other forms of PWV (P=0.705 for heterogeneity). The effects of MRA on PWV were independent of blood pressure reduction related to the treatment according to meta-regression analysis. The MRA treatment reduced the augmentation index compared with control in 5 trials including 283 patients (MD, -6.74% [95% CI, -10.26 to -3.21], P=0.0002) and increased the flow-mediated dilation in 11 trials including 570 patients (MD, 1.18% [95% CI, 0.14 to 2.23], P=0.03). In conclusion, the current meta-analysis demonstrates the beneficial effects of MRA on PWV, augmentation index, and flow-mediated dilation.

Effects of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in proteinuric kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Reductions in albuminuria of more than 30% are considered a strong marker of delay of chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression. Single renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade represents the cornerstone of CKD treatment. However, as CKD progression still occurs, other nephroprotective options were explored; mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) were tested with generally positive results.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of MRAs on albuminuria/proteinuria, and adverse events, such as change in renal function and hyperkalemia incidence. A detailed search in electronic databases, clinical trial registries and grey literature was performed to retrieve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which administration of an MRA alone or on-top of ACEi/ARB was compared with placebo or active treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 45 initially identified reports, 31, with 2767 participants, were included in analysis of the primary outcome. The use of MRAs (alone or on top of RAS blockade) compared with placebo decreased urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) by -24.55% (95% CI -29.57 to -19.53%), urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) by -53.93% (95% CI -79% to -28.86%) and 24 h albumin excretion by -32.47% (95% CI -41.1 to -23.85%). MRAs also reduced UACR by -22.48% (95% CI -24.51 to -20.44%) compared with calcium-channel-blockers (CCBs), whereas no differences were found compared with a second ACEi/ARB or nonpotassium-sparing diuretics. Addition of an MRA was associated with change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of -2.38 ml/min per 1.73 m (95% CI -3.51 to -1.25), rise in potassium by 0.22 mEq/l (95% CI 0.16-0.28 mEq/l) and a 2.6-fold increase in hyperkalemia risk (RR 2.63, 95% CI 1.69-4.08) compared with placebo/active control.

CONCLUSION

Use of MRAs alone or on top of RAS blockade confers important antiproteinuric effects in patients with CKD, with a slight increase in mean potassium levels.

Eplerenone improves endothelial function and arterial stiffness and inhibits Rho-associated kinase activity in patients with idiopathic hyperaldosteronism: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

Primary aldosteronism is one of the most common cause of secondary hypertension. It is well known that the incidence of cardiovascular events is higher in patients with primary aldosteronism than in patients with essential hypertension. In a previous study, we showed that aldosterone-producing adenoma is associated with vascular function and structure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of eplerenone on vascular function in the macrovasculature and microvasculature, arterial stiffness and Rho-associated kinase (ROCK) activity in patients with idiopathic hyperaldosteronism (IHA).

METHODS

Vascular function, including reactive hyperemia index (RHI), flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) and nitroglycerine-induced vasodilation (NID), arterial stiffness including brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) and brachial intima-media thickness (IMT) and ROCK activity in peripheral leukocytes were measured before and after 12 weeks of treatment with eplerenone in 50 patients with IHA.

RESULTS

After 12 weeks, eplerenone decreased the aldosterone renin ratio but did not alter SBP and DBP. Eplerenone treatment increased log RHI from 0.56 ± 0.25 to 0.69 ± 0.25 (P < 0.01) and NID from 12.8 ± 5.8 to 14.9 ± 6.9% (P = 0.02) and it decreased baPWV from 1540 ± 263 to 1505 ± 281 (P = 0.04) and ROCK activity from 1.20 ± 0.54 to 0.89 ± 0.42 (P < 0.01), whereas there was no significant change in FMD (increase from 4.6 ± 3.4 to 4.6 ± 3.6%, P = 0.99) or brachial IMT (decrease from 0.28 ± 0.07 to 0.28 ± 0.04 mm, P = 0.14).

CONCLUSION

Eplerenone improves microvascular endothelial function, vascular smooth muscle function, arterial stiffness and ROCK activity in patients with IHA.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

URL for Clinical Trial: http://UMIN; Registration Number for Clinical Trial: UMIN000003409.

Managing Hypertension in the elderly: What's new?

Hypertension is the leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular events and mortality in the world. Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular events and mortality in the elderly. The 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association hypertension guidelines recommend treatment of noninstitutionalized ambulatory community-dwelling persons aged 65 years and older with an average systolic blood pressure of 130 ​mm Hg or higher or a diastolic blood pressure of 80 ​mm Hg or higher with lifestyle measures plus antihypertensive drug to lower the blood pressure to less than 130/80 ​mm Hg For elderly adults with hypertension and a high burden of comorbidities and limited life expectancy, clinical judgment, patient preference, and a team-based approach to assess risk/benefit is reasonable for decisions about the intensity of SBP lowering and the choice of antihypertensive drugs to use for treatment. Randomized clinical trials need to be performed in frail elderly patients with hypertension living in nursing homes. Elderly frail persons with prevalent and frequent falls, marked cognitive impairment, and multiple comorbidities requiring multiple antihypertensive drugs also need to be included in randomized clinical trials. Data on patients older than 85 years treated for hypertension are also sparse. These patients need clinical trial data. Finally, the effect of different antihypertensive drugs on clinical outcomes including serious adverse events needs to be investigated in elderly frail patients with hypertension and different comorbidities.

Managing the elderly patient with hypertension: current strategies, challenges, and considerations

Introduction: Hypertension is the leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular events and mortality in the world.Areas covered: An extensive literature review of articles and clinical trials on PUBMED on the topic of hypertension in the elderly from 1976 through January 2020 was conducted. This review article discusses clinical trials on treatment of hypertension in the elderly, the 2017 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) hypertension guidelines, the 2018 European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension guidelines, and the treatment of hypertension and of resistant hypertension in the elderly.Expert opinion: The 2017 ACC/AHA hypertension guidelines recommend treatment of noninstitutionalized ambulatory community-dwelling adults aged 65 years and older with an average systolic blood pressure of 130 mm Hg or higher with lifestyle measures plus antihypertensive drug to lower the blood pressure to less than 130/80 mm Hg. For elderly adults with hypertension and a high burden of comorbidities and limited life expectancy, clinical judgment, patient preference, and a team-based approach to assess risk/benefit is reasonable for decisions about the intensity of SBP lowering and the choice of antihypertensive drugs to use for treatment.

Approaches for the Management of Resistant Hypertension in 2020

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Resistant hypertension is diagnosed if the blood pressure (BP) is not controlled despite optimum doses of 3 first-line classes of antihypertensive drugs including a thiazide diuretic or if adequate BP control needs 4 or more antihypertensive drugs from different classes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pseudohypertension and white coat hypertension must be excluded. Poor patient compliance, inadequate doses of antihypertensive drugs, poor office BP measurement technique, and having to pay for costs of drugs are factors associated with pseudoresistant hypertension. Secondary hypertension must be excluded and treated. Therapy of resistant hypertension includes improving compliance with use of medication, detection, and treatment of secondary hypertension, use of lifestyle measures, and treatment of obesity and other comorbidities. Switching the patient from hydrochlorothiazide to a longer acting thiazide-type diuretic such as chlorthalidone may improve BP control. The beneficial effects of thiazide diuretics are reduced when the glomerular filtration rate is reduced to less than 40 mL/min/1.73 m2. These patients should be treated with a loop diuretic such as furosemide every 12 h. If a fourth antihypertensive drug is needed to control blood pressure in persons treated with adequate doses of antihypertensive drugs from different classes including a thiazide-type diuretic, a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist should be added to the therapeutic regimen. Further research is needed on investigational drugs and device therapy for treating resistant hypertension. Clinical trials are indicated for the treatment of resistant hypertension by sacubitril/valsartan and also by firibastat.

Vascular mineralocorticoid receptor activation and disease

Mineralocorticoid receptor activation in endothelial and smooth muscle cells can promote vascular disease by increasing oxidative stress, promoting inflammation, accelerating vascular stiffness, remodeling, and calcification, altering vessel responsiveness to various vasoactive factors, thus altering vascular tone and blood pressure, and by altering angiogenesis. Here, we review the recent evidence highlighting the impact of vascular mineralocorticoid receptor activation in pathological situations, including kidney injury, vascular injury associated with metabolic diseases, atherosclerosis, cerebral vascular injury during hypertension, vascular stiffening and aging, pulmonary hypertension, vascular calcification, cardiac remodeling, wound healing, inflammation, thrombosis, and disorders related to angiogenic defects in the eye. The possible mechanisms implicating mineralocorticoid receptor activation in various vascular disorders are discussed. Altogether, recent evidence points towards pharmacological mineralocorticoid receptor inhibition as a strategy to treat diseases in which overactivation of the mineralocorticoid receptor in endothelial and/or smooth muscle cells may play a pivotal role.

Prognostic Impact of Aortic Stiffness in Patients With Resistant Hypertension

The prognostic importance of aortic stiffness in patients with resistant hypertension has never been investigated. We aimed to evaluate it for the occurrence of adverse cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in a prospective cohort of resistant hypertensive patients. Aortic stiffness was assessed by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) at baseline in 891 resistant hypertensive patients who were followed-up for a median of 7.8 years. Multivariate Cox analysis examined the associations between cf-PWV and the occurrence of total cardiovascular events (CVE), major adverse CVEs, and cardiovascular and all-cause mortalities. The improvement in risk stratification was assessed by C statistics and the integrated discrimination improvement index. During follow-up, 138 patients had a CVE (123 major adverse CVE) and 142 patients died (91 from cardiovascular causes). The cf-PWV, analyzed either as a continuous or as a categorical variable, predicted all cardiovascular and mortality outcomes. Patients with increased aortic stiffness (cf-PWV ≥10 m/s after correction for the white-coat effect, or uncorrected directly measured ≥11 m/s) had a significant 2.2- to 2.6-fold increased risk of CVEs and mortality, after adjustments for other risk factors, including 24-hour ambulatory blood pressures and dipping patterns. Aortic stiffness significantly improved cardiovascular risk stratification, with integrated discrimination improvement indices ranging from 13% (for total CVEs) to 18% (for major adverse CVE). In conclusion, increased aortic stiffness predicts adverse cardiovascular outcomes and mortality and improves cardiovascular risk stratification in resistant hypertensive patients. cf-PWV measurement should be included into the routine clinical management of resistant hypertension.

Mineralocorticoid Antagonism and Vascular Function in Early Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Vascular dysfunction, characterized by impaired vascular endothelial function and increased large-elastic artery stiffness, is evident early in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) and is an important predictor of cardiovascular events and mortality. Aldosterone excess has been implicated in the development of endothelial dysfunction and arterial stiffness, in part by causing increased oxidative stress and inflammation. We hypothesized that aldosterone antagonism would reduce vascular dysfunction in patients with early-stage ADPKD.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, clinical trial.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

61 adults aged 20 to 55 years with ADPKD, estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 60mL/min/1.73m², and receiving a renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor.

INTERVENTION

Spironolactone (maximum dose, 50mg/d) or placebo for 24 weeks.

OUTCOMES

Change in brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD_BA) was the primary end point and change in carotid-femoral pulse-wave velocity (CFPWV) was the secondary end point.

RESULTS

60 participants completed the trial. Participants had a mean age of 34±10 (SD) years, 54% were women, and 84% were non-Hispanic white. Spironolactone did not change FMD_BA (8.0% ± 5.5% and 7.8% ± 4.3% at baseline and 24 weeks, respectively, vs corresponding values in the placebo group of 8.4% ± 6.2% and 8.0% ± 4.6%; P=0.9for comparison of change between groups) or CFPWV (640±127 and 603±101cm/s at baseline and 24 weeks, respectively, vs corresponding values in the placebo group of 659±138 and 658±131cm/s; P=0.1). Brachial systolic blood pressure was reduced with spironolactone (median change, -6 [IQR, -15, 1] vs -2 [IQR, -7, 10] mm Hg in the placebo group; P=0.04). Spironolactone did not change the majority of circulating and/or endothelial cell markers of oxidative stress/inflammation and did not change vascular oxidative stress.

LIMITATIONS

Low level of baseline vascular dysfunction; lack of aldosterone measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

24 weeks of aldosterone antagonism reduced systolic blood pressure without changing vascular function in patients with early-stage ADPKD.

FUNDING

NIDDK, NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, and the Zell Family Foundation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with study number NCT01853553.

Potential Role of Antihypertensive Medications in Preventing Excessive Arterial Stiffening

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Increased arterial stiffness, an abnormal structural and functional change in the vascular wall, is a precursor for hypertension, coronary heart disease, stroke, and associated cardiovascular disease (CVD). The aim of this paper is to review the etiology of arterial stiffening and potential therapeutic approaches to modulate arterial fibrosis and stiffness.

RECENT FINDINGS

The Framingham Heart Study demonstrated that arterial stiffness is an independent predictor of CVD and related morbidity and mortality. Dysfunction of endothelial cells, vascular smooth muscle cells, extracellular matrix, and other functional elements of the vessel wall contribute to underlying pathophysiology of increased arterial stiffness. An activated renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, oxidative stress, abnormal peri-vascular adipose tissue, inflammation, and increased sympathetic nervous system activity are associated with the development and progression of arterial fibrosis, stiffening, and associated CVD. In this review, we will discuss the structural and function changes and mechanisms of the vessel wall in arterial stiffness and provide potential therapeutic strategies.

Effect of mineralocorticoid antagonists on blood pressure lowering: overview and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in hypertension

OBJECTIVES

Although mineralocorticoid antagonists (MRAs) have been proposed as effective fourth-line blood pressure (BP)-lowering agents in resistant hypertension, this effect in hypertension at-large is unclear. We evaluated whether MRAs-mediated BP lowering is both effective and safe against controls and whether the extent of BP lowering differs between resistant hypertension and nonresistant hypertension .

METHODS

We searched Medline and the Cochrane Collaboration Library databases from 1991 to mid-September 2017 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), in which MRAs were compared with placebo or other active drugs. Main outcomes were SBP and DBP lowering and treatment-related discontinuations. Continuous outcome variables were pooled as mean difference and the categorical variables as risk ratios, both with 95% confidence interval (CI). The risk of bias was assessed by using the Cochrane collaboration tool.

RESULTS

We included 21 RCTs (2736 patients) of MRAs compared either with placebo or with active agents. Whenever all selected trials were analyzed together (MRAs versus controls), the resulting BP reduction was -7.6 (95% CI -10 to -5.3) mmHg for SBP and -2.5 (95% CI -4.2 to -0.8) mmHg for DBP, while limiting our analysis to MRAs versus placebo mean difference was increased by -2.1/-1.3 mmHg. We find no differential BP lowering between resistant hypertension and non-resistant hypertension. Treatment-related discontinuations were not different compared with either placebo or active comparators.

CONCLUSION

As the extent of BP lowering following treatment with MRAs in patients with and without resistant hypertension was similar and not accompanied by increased rate of treatment-related discontinuations compared with other active comparators, these agents may have a role in BP lowering in already treated hypertensive patients who did not reach target BP values.

Spironolactone is superior to hydrochlorothiazide for blood pressure control and arterial stiffness improvement: A prospective study

The present study is to investigate whether spironolactone is better than hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) for blood pressure (BP) control and arterial stiffness improvement. Five-hundred-sixty-six uncontrolled hypertensive patients with 2 different classes of antihypertensive medications treatment were enrolled. Spironolactone or HCTZ was randomly prescribed for 4 weeks. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) was measured at baseline and after 4 weeks' of spironolactone or HCTZ treatment. Between-group differences were evaluated, and logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association of cf-PWV increase and incident resistant hypertension. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed between spironolactone and HCTZ groups. After 4 weeks' treatment, both systolic BP and cf-PWV were reduced more profoundly in spironolactone group versus HCTZ group (P < .05). Pearson and Spearman correlation analysis showed that age, diabetes mellitus, and HCTZ were positively correlated with cf-PWV, while spironolactone was negatively with cf-PWV. Logistic regression analysis indicated that per 1-standard deviation increase in cf-PWV was associated with 92% higher incidence of resistant hypertension. After adjusted for spironolactone, no significant association between cf-PWV increase and incident resistant hypertension was observed, indicating that the adverse effect of arterial stiffness on resistant hypertension development might be reversed by spironolactone treatment. In summary, uncontrolled hypertensive patients with spironolactone treatment appear to have better BP control and arterial stiffness improvement.