Resistance to antihypertensive treatment and long-term risk: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study

Empagliflozin in resistant hypertension and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the EMPEROR-Preserved trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Hypertension has a high prevalence in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), which can be controlled, uncontrolled, or even resistant. The effects of empagliflozin on systolic blood pressure (SBP), time in target range, incidence of hypertensive urgencies, and studied cardiovascular and renal outcomes in different hypertension categories and after treatment with empagliflozin in the EMPEROR-Preserved trial were explored.

METHODS

A total of 5533 patients were studied and the population was separated into resistant (resHTN), uncontrolled (uctrHTN), and controlled (ctrHTN) hypertension. The effect of SBP on outcomes and treatment effects of empagliflozin were explored. Analyses were done with Cox regression analyses adjusted for demographic and clinical confounders and with a mixed model for repeated measures.

RESULTS

Empagliflozin reduced SBP in resHTN slightly more than in the other categories in the first weeks, while thereafter there were no significant differences. The modest reduction in SBP resulted in a moderate increase in time at target and reduced hypertensive urgencies. The primary endpoint was more prevalent in resHTN (P = .0358), but the treatment effect of empagliflozin on the primary endpoint was similar in resHTN, uctrHTN, and ctrHTN (P for interaction = .92) as was the improvement of the estimated glomerular filtration rate slope (P for interaction = .95) and change in quality of life by empagliflozin.

CONCLUSIONS

In HFpEF, the prevalence of resHTN is high and is associated with frequently higher outcome rates compared with ctrHTN and uctrHTN. The treatment effect was not modified by hypertension categories. This indicates that in HFpEF, moderate modifications of blood pressure do not affect overall outcomes and treatment effects of empagliflozin.

Poor Olfaction and Risk of Stroke in Older Adults: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study

BACKGROUND

Poor olfaction may be associated with adverse cerebrovascular events, but empirical evidence is limited. We aimed to investigate the association of olfaction with the risk of stroke in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.

METHODS

We included 5799 older adults with no history of stroke at baseline from 2011 to 2013 (75.5±5.1 years, 59.0% female and 22.2% Black). Olfaction was assessed by the 12-item Sniffin' Sticks odor identification test and defined as poor (number correct ≤8), moderate (9-10), or good (11-12). Participants were followed from baseline to the date of the first stroke, death, last contact, or December 31, 2020, whichever occurred first. We used the discrete-time subdistribution hazard model to estimate the marginal cumulative incidence of stroke across olfactory statuses and adjusted risk ratios, accounting for covariates and competing risk of death.

RESULTS

After up to 9.6 years of follow-up, we identified 332 incident stroke events. The adjusted marginal cumulative incidence of stroke at 9.6-year follow-up was 5.3% (95% CI, 4.2%-6.3%), 5.9% (95% CI, 4.8%-7.1%), and 7.7% (95% CI, 6.5%-9.1%) for good, moderate, and poor olfaction, respectively. Compared with good olfaction, poor olfaction was significantly associated with higher stroke risk throughout follow-up, albeit the association modestly attenuated after 6 years. Specifically, the adjusted risk ratios were 2.14 (95% CI, 1.22-3.94) at year 2, 1.98 (95% CI, 1.43-3.02) at year 4, 1.91 (95% CI, 1.43-2.77) at year 6, 1.49 (95% CI, 1.17-2.00) at year 8, and 1.45 (95% CI, 1.16-1.95) at year 9.6. Results were robust in multiple subgroup and sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

In older adults, poor olfaction assessed by a single olfaction test was associated with the higher risk of stroke in the next 10 years.

Leveraging Therapeutic Proteins and Peptides from Lumbricus Earthworms: Targeting SOCS2 E3 Ligase for Cardiovascular Therapy through Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Suppressor of cytokine signaling 2 (SOCS2), an E3 ubiquitin ligase, regulates the JAK/STAT signaling pathway, essential for cytokine signaling and immune responses. Its dysregulation contributes to cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) by promoting abnormal cell growth, inflammation, and resistance to cell death. This study aimed to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying the interactions between Lumbricus-derived proteins and peptides and SOCS2, with a focus on identifying potential therapeutic candidates for CVDs. Utilizing a multifaceted approach, advanced computational methodologies, including 3D structure modeling, protein-protein docking, 100 ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, and MM/PBSA calculations, were employed to assess the binding affinities and functional implications of Lumbricus-derived proteins on SOCS2 activity. The findings revealed that certain proteins, such as Lumbricin, Chemoattractive glycoprotein ES20, and Lumbrokinase-7T1, exhibited similar activities to standard antagonists in modulating SOCS2 activity. Furthermore, MM/PBSA calculations were employed to assess the binding free energies of these proteins with SOCS2. Specifically, Lumbricin exhibited an average ΔGbinding of -59.25 kcal/mol, Chemoattractive glycoprotein ES20 showed -55.02 kcal/mol, and Lumbrokinase-7T1 displayed -69.28 kcal/mol. These values suggest strong binding affinities between these proteins and SOCS2, reinforcing their potential therapeutic efficacy in cardiovascular diseases. Further in vitro and animal studies are recommended to validate these findings and explore broader applications of Lumbricus-derived proteins.

Whole genome sequence analysis of apparent treatment resistant hypertension status in participants from the Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine program

Introduction: Apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH) is characterized by the use of four or more antihypertensive (AHT) classes to achieve blood pressure (BP) control. In the current study, we conducted single-variant and gene-based analyses of aTRH among individuals from 12 Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine cohorts with whole-genome sequencing data. Methods: Cases were defined as individuals treated for hypertension (HTN) taking three different AHT classes, with average systolic BP ≥ 140 or diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg, or four or more medications regardless of BP (n = 1,705). A normotensive control group was defined as individuals with BP < 140/90 mmHg (n = 22,079), not on AHT medication. A second control group comprised individuals who were treatment responsive on one AHT medication with BP < 140/ 90 mmHg (n = 5,424). Logistic regression with kinship adjustment using the Scalable and Accurate Implementation of Generalized mixed models (SAIGE) was performed, adjusting for age, sex, and genetic ancestry. We assessed variants using SKAT-O in rare-variant analyses. Single-variant and gene-based tests were conducted in a pooled multi-ethnicity stratum, as well as self-reported ethnic/racial strata (European and African American). Results: One variant in the known HTN locus, KCNK3, was a top finding in the multi-ethnic analysis (p = 8.23E-07) for the normotensive control group [rs12476527, odds ratio (95% confidence interval) = 0.80 (0.74-0.88)]. This variant was replicated in the Vanderbilt University Medical Center's DNA repository data. Aggregate gene-based signals included the genes AGTPBP, MYL4, PDCD4, BBS9, ERG, and IER3. Discussion: Additional work validating these loci in larger, more diverse populations, is warranted to determine whether these regions influence the pathobiology of aTRH.

Dapagliflozin and Apparent Treatment-Resistant Hypertension in Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction: The DELIVER Trial

BACKGROUND

Apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH) is prevalent and associated with adverse outcomes in heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. Less is known about the potential role of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibition in this high-risk population. In this post hoc analysis of the DELIVER trial (Dapagliflozin Evaluation to Improve the Lives of Patients with Preserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure), we evaluated clinical profiles and treatment effects of dapagliflozin among participants with aTRH.

METHODS

DELIVER participants were categorized on the basis of baseline blood pressure (BP), with aTRH defined as BP ≥140/90 mm Hg (≥130/80 mm Hg if diabetes) despite treatment with 3 antihypertensive drugs including a diuretic. Nonresistant hypertension was defined as BP above threshold but not meeting aTRH criteria. Controlled BP was defined as BP under threshold. Incidence of the primary outcome (cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure event), key secondary outcomes, and safety events was assessed by baseline BP category.

RESULTS

Among 6263 DELIVER participants, 3766 (60.1%) had controlled BP, 1779 (28.4%) had nonresistant hypertension, and 718 (11.5%) had aTRH at baseline. Participants with aTRH had more cardiometabolic comorbidities and tended to have higher left ventricular ejection fraction and worse kidney function. Rates of the primary outcome were 8.7 per 100 patient-years in those with controlled BP, 8.5 per 100 patient-years in the nonresistant hypertension group, and 9.5 per 100 patient-years in the aTRH group. Relative treatment benefits of dapagliflozin versus placebo on the primary outcome were consistent across BP categories (Pinteraction=0.114). Participants with aTRH exhibited the greatest absolute reduction in the rate of primary events with dapagliflozin (4.1 per 100 patient-years) compared with nonresistant hypertension (2.7 per 100 patient-years) and controlled BP (0.8 per 100 patient-years). Irrespective of assigned treatment, participants with aTRH experienced a higher rate of reported vascular events, including myocardial infarction and stroke, over study follow-up. Dapagliflozin modestly reduced systolic BP (by ≈1 to 3 mm Hg) without increasing risk of hypotension, hypovolemia, or other serious adverse events, irrespective of BP category, but did not improve the proportion of participants with aTRH attaining goal BP over time.

CONCLUSIONS

aTRH was identified in >1 in 10 patients with heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction >40% in DELIVER. Dapagliflozin consistently improved clinical outcomes and was well-tolerated, including among those with aTRH.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03619213.

Lifestyle Medicine as a Treatment for Resistant Hypertension

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Approximately 10% of the adults with hypertension fail to achieve the recommended blood pressure treatment targets on 3 antihypertensive medications or require ≥ 4 medications to achieve goal. These patients with 'resistant hypertension' have an increased risk of target organ damage, adverse clinical events, and all-cause mortality. Although lifestyle modification is widely recommended as a first-line approach for the management of high blood pressure, the effects of lifestyle modifications in patients with resistant hypertension has not been widely studied. This review aims to provide an overview of the emerging evidence on the benefits of lifestyle modifications in patients with resistant hypertension, reviews potential mechanisms by which lifestyles may reduce blood pressure, and discusses the clinical implications of the recent findings in this field.

RECENT FINDINGS

Evidence from single-component randomized clinical trials demonstrated that aerobic exercise, weight loss and dietary modification can reduce clinic and ambulatory blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension. Moreover, evidence from multi-component trials involving exercise and dietary modification and weight management can facilitate lifestyle change, reduce clinic and ambulatory blood pressure, and improve biomarkers of cardiovascular risk. This new evidence supports the efficacy of lifestyle modifications added to optimized medical therapy in reducing blood pressure and improving cardiovascular risk biomarkers in patients with resistant hypertension. These findings need to be confirmed in larger studies, and the persistence of benefit over extended follow-up needs further study.

Blood Pressure in Patients with Arterial Hypertension and Overweight or Obesity During Office Measurement and Daily Monitoring

Arterial hypertension (AH) is one of the most common chronic diseases in the world. More than 1.5 billion people suffer from hypertension. According to official statistics, in Ukraine in 2021 more than 13 million patients with AH were registered, and annually this disease is detected in 1 million Ukrainians. The objective: to determine the levels of blood pressure (BP) in overweighted or obese patients with AH who use antihypertensive drugs during office measurement and 24-hours monitoring of BP. Materials and methods. The study analyzed the results of treatment of 395 overweighted or obese patients (139 women and 236 men) with essential AH. All patients received antihypertensive treatment for at least 3 months before study start. Patients were divided into five groups depending on blood pressure. The control group included 33 age-matched individuals. During the study BP was measured in physician’s office with use of mechanical tonometer with a shoulder cuff and ambulatory 24-hours blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was performed for all patients. Results. The results of office blood pressure measurement and ABPM were analyzed. Normal BP was detected in 34.7% of patients with AH and high BMI. In 10.9% of patients systolic blood pressure (SBP) remains above 139 mm Hg despite of drug use, in 16.3% of patients the grade 1 AH was diagnosed, in 23.2% – grade 2, and in 14.9% – grade 3 AH was deter mined during office blood pressure measurement. It was found that men are 1.7 times more likely had uncontrolled AH comparing to women. The further analyze of the BP data showed that office BP levels were higher then home. Target blood pressure levels were found in 87% of patients during ABPM, although in the office measurement this figure was 54%, 5% of patients could not withstand the BP monitoring during the day with an automatic device due to pain. No difference in heart rate was determined in study patients by different types of measurement. Conclusions. In patients with AH and high body mass index, office measurement reveals insufficient reduction of blood pressure (BP) in 35% of patients despite of antihypertensive drugs use. At the same time ABPM found target BP achievement in 87% of patients. Thus, ABPM should be performed in overweighted or obese patients with AH before making the decision to increase the antihypertensive drug dose to avoid possible undesirable BP decrease.