1
|
Saidy B, Vasan R, Durant R, Greener MR, Immanuel A, Green AR, Rakha E, Ellis I, Ball G, Martin SG, Storr SJ. Unravelling transcriptomic complexity in breast cancer through modulation of DARPP-32 expression and signalling pathways. Sci Rep 2023; 13:21163. [PMID: 38036593 PMCID: PMC10689788 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-48198-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
DARPP-32 is a key regulator of protein-phosphatase-1 (PP-1) and protein kinase A (PKA), with its function dependent upon its phosphorylation state. We previously identified DKK1 and GRB7 as genes with linked expression using Artificial Neural Network (ANN) analysis; here, we determine protein expression in a large cohort of early-stage breast cancer patients. Low levels of DARPP-32 Threonine-34 phosphorylation and DKK1 expression were significantly associated with poor patient prognosis, while low levels of GRB7 expression were linked to better survival outcomes. To gain insight into mechanisms underlying these associations, we analysed the transcriptome of T47D breast cancer cells following DARPP-32 knockdown. We identified 202 differentially expressed transcripts and observed that some overlapped with genes implicated in the ANN analysis, including PTK7, TRAF5, and KLK6, amongst others. Furthermore, we found that treatment of DARPP-32 knockdown cells with 17β-estradiol or PKA inhibitor fragment (6-22) amide led to the differential expression of 193 and 181 transcripts respectively. These results underscore the importance of DARPP-32, a central molecular switch, and its downstream targets, DKK1 and GRB7 in breast cancer. The discovery of common genes identified by a combined patient/cell line transcriptomic approach provides insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying differential breast cancer prognosis and highlights potential targets for therapeutic intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Behnaz Saidy
- Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, Biodiscovery Institute, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Richa Vasan
- Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, Biodiscovery Institute, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Rosie Durant
- Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, Biodiscovery Institute, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Megan-Rose Greener
- Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, Biodiscovery Institute, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Adelynn Immanuel
- Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, Biodiscovery Institute, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Andrew R Green
- Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, Biodiscovery Institute, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Emad Rakha
- Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, Biodiscovery Institute, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Ian Ellis
- Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, Biodiscovery Institute, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Graham Ball
- Medical Technology Research Centre, Anglia Ruskin University, Bishop Hall Lane, Chelmsford, CM1 1SQ, UK
| | - Stewart G Martin
- Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, Biodiscovery Institute, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Sarah J Storr
- Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, Biodiscovery Institute, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nikhil K, Shah K. CDK5: an oncogene or an anti-oncogene: location location location. Mol Cancer 2023; 22:186. [PMID: 37993880 PMCID: PMC10666462 DOI: 10.1186/s12943-023-01895-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent studies have uncovered various physiological functions of CDK5 in many nonneuronal tissues. Upregulation of CDK5 and/or its activator p35 in neurons promotes healthy neuronal functions, but their overexpression in nonneuronal tissues is causally linked to cancer of many origins. This review focuses on the molecular mechanisms by which CDK5 recruits diverse tissue-specific substrates to elicit distinct phenotypes in sixteen different human cancers. The emerging theme suggests that CDK5's role as an oncogene or anti-oncogene depends upon its subcellular localization. CDK5 mostly acts as an oncogene, but in gastric cancer, it is a tumor suppressor due to its unique nuclear localization. This indicates that CDK5's access to certain nuclear substrates converts it into an anti-oncogenic kinase. While acting as a bonafide oncogene, CDK5 also activates a few cancer-suppressive pathways in some cancers, presumably due to the mislocalization of nuclear substrates in the cytoplasm. Therefore, directing CDK5 to the nucleus or exporting tumor-suppressive nuclear substrates to the cytoplasm may be promising approaches to combat CDK5-induced oncogenicity, analogous to neurotoxicity triggered by nuclear CDK5. Furthermore, while p35 overexpression is oncogenic, hyperactivation of CDK5 by inducing p25 formation results in apoptosis, which could be exploited to selectively kill cancer cells by dialing up CDK5 activity, instead of inhibiting it. CDK5 thus acts as a molecular rheostat, with different activity levels eliciting distinct functional outcomes. Finally, as CDK5's role is defined by its substrates, targeting them individually or in conjunction with CDK5 should create potentially valuable new clinical opportunities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kumar Nikhil
- Department of Chemistry, Purdue University Center for Cancer Research, 560 Oval Drive, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
- School of Biotechnology, Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology, Bhubaneswar, 751024, India
| | - Kavita Shah
- Department of Chemistry, Purdue University Center for Cancer Research, 560 Oval Drive, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alam SK, Wang L, Zhu Z, Hoeppner LH. IKKα promotes lung adenocarcinoma growth through ERK signaling activation via DARPP-32-mediated inhibition of PP1 activity. NPJ Precis Oncol 2023; 7:33. [PMID: 36966223 PMCID: PMC10039943 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-023-00370-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 80-85% cases of lung cancer cases. Diagnosis at advanced stages is common, after which therapy-refractory disease progression frequently occurs. Therefore, a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms that control NSCLC progression is necessary to develop new therapies. Overexpression of IκB kinase α (IKKα) in NSCLC correlates with poor patient survival. IKKα is an NF-κB-activating kinase that is important in cell survival and differentiation, but its regulation of oncogenic signaling is not well understood. We recently demonstrated that IKKα promotes NSCLC cell migration by physically interacting with dopamine- and cyclic AMP-regulated phosphoprotein, Mr 32000 (DARPP-32), and its truncated splice variant, t-DARPP. Here, we show that IKKα phosphorylates DARPP-32 at threonine 34, resulting in DARPP-32-mediated inhibition of protein phosphatase 1 (PP1), subsequent inhibition of PP1-mediated dephosphorylation of ERK, and activation of ERK signaling to promote lung oncogenesis. Correspondingly, IKKα ablation in human lung adenocarcinoma cells reduced their anchorage-independent growth in soft agar. Mice challenged with IKKα-ablated HCC827 cells exhibited less lung tumor growth than mice orthotopically administered control HCC827 cells. Our findings suggest that IKKα drives NSCLC growth through the activation of ERK signaling via DARPP-32-mediated inhibition of PP1 activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sk Kayum Alam
- The Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, MN, USA.
| | - Li Wang
- The Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, MN, USA
| | - Zhu Zhu
- The Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, MN, USA
| | - Luke H Hoeppner
- The Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, MN, USA.
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Saidy B, Kotecha S, Butler A, Rakha EA, Ellis IO, Green AR, Martin SG, Storr SJ. PP1, PKA and DARPP-32 in breast cancer: A retrospective assessment of protein and mRNA expression. J Cell Mol Med 2021; 25:5015-5024. [PMID: 33991172 PMCID: PMC8178272 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.16447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Revised: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Cyclic AMP–dependent protein kinase A (PKA) and protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) are proteins involved in numerous essential signalling pathways that modulate physiological and pathological functions. Both PP1 and PKA can be inhibited by dopamine‐ and cAMP‐regulated phosphoprotein 32 kD (DARPP‐32). Using immunohistochemistry, PKA and PP1 expression was determined in a large primary breast tumour cohort to evaluate associations between clinical outcome and clinicopathological criteria (n > 1100). In addition, mRNA expression of PKA and PP1 subunits was assessed in the METABRIC data set (n = 1980). Low protein expression of PKA was significantly associated with adverse survival of breast cancer patients; interestingly, this relationship was stronger in ER‐positive breast cancer patients. PP1 protein expression was not associated with patient survival. PKA and PP1 subunit mRNA was also assessed; PPP1CA, PRKACG and PRKAR1B were associated with breast cancer–specific survival. In patients with high expression of DARPP‐32, low expression of PP1 was associated with adverse survival when compared to high expression in the same group. PKA expression and PP1 expression are of significant interest in cancer as they are involved in a wide array of cellular processes, and these data indicate PKA and PP1 may play an important role in patient outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Behnaz Saidy
- Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, Nottingham, UK
| | - Shreeya Kotecha
- Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, Nottingham, UK
| | - Anna Butler
- Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, Nottingham, UK
| | - Emad A Rakha
- Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, Nottingham, UK
| | - Ian O Ellis
- Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, Nottingham, UK
| | - Andrew R Green
- Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, Nottingham, UK
| | - Stewart G Martin
- Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sarah J Storr
- Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Martin SG, Zhang S, Yang S, Saidy B, Deen S, Storr SJ. Dopamine and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein 32kDa (DARPP-32), protein phosphatase-1 and cyclin-dependent kinase 5 expression in ovarian cancer. J Cell Mol Med 2020; 24:9165-9175. [PMID: 32588513 PMCID: PMC7417681 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.15553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2019] [Revised: 04/06/2020] [Accepted: 06/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Dopamine and cyclic‐AMP activated phosphoprotein Mr32kDa (DARPP‐32) is a central signalling protein in neurotransmission. Following DARPP‐32 phosphorylation by protein kinase A (PKA), DARPP‐32 becomes a potent protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) inhibitor. DARPP‐32 can itself inhibit PKA following DARPP‐32 phosphorylation by cyclin‐dependent kinase 5 (Cdk5). Increasing evidence indicates a role for DARPP‐32 and its associated signalling pathways in cancer; however, its role in ovarian cancer remains unclear. Using immunohistochemistry, expression of DARPP‐32, PP1 and Cdk5 was determined in a large cohort of primary tumours from ovarian cancer patients (n = 428, 445 and 434 respectively) to evaluate associations between clinical outcome and clinicopathological criteria. Low cytoplasmic and nuclear DARPP‐32 expression was associated with shorter patient overall survival and progression‐free survival (P = .001, .001, .004 and .037 respectively). Low nuclear and cytoplasmic DARPP‐32 expression remained significantly associated with overall survival in multivariate Cox regression (P = .045, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.734, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.542‐0.993 and P = .001, HR = 0.494, 95% CI = 0.325‐0.749, respectively). High cytoplasmic and nuclear PP1 expression was associated with shorter patient overall survival and high cytoplasmic PP1 expression with shorter progression‐free survival (P = .005, .033, and .037, respectively). High Cdk5 expression was associated with shorter progression‐free survival (P = .006). These data suggest a role for DARPP‐32 and associated signalling kinases as prognostic markers with clinical utility in ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stewart G Martin
- Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, Nottingham, UK
| | - Siwei Zhang
- Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, Nottingham, UK
| | - Song Yang
- Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, Nottingham, UK
| | - Behnaz Saidy
- Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Sarah J Storr
- Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|