Drug-drug interaction between valproic acid and meropenem: a retrospective analysis of electronic medical records from neurosurgery inpatients

Carbapenems in the management of valproic acid overdose (MPT-01166-24 R1)

Severe valproic acid (VPA) overdose is characterized by coma (sometimes with cerebral oedema), respiratory depression, hypotension and metabolic abnormalities. Traditional management of VPA poisoning has been limited to gastrointestinal decontamination, L-carnitine supplementation and, in severe cases, haemodialysis. Recently, interest has developed in the use of carbapenem antibiotics as an adjunctive therapy in patients with severe VPA poisoning. Carbapenems inhibit acylpeptide hydrolase, the enzyme responsible for reconstituting VPA from VPA-glucuronide, and transiently promote distribution of VPA into erythrocytes. In patients receiving VPA therapeutically, carbapenems lower VPA concentrations abruptly, dramatically, and for a sustained period. This article discusses the possibility of exploiting this pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction in patients with or at risk of severe VPA poisoning.

Effect of a Declined Plasma Concentration of Valproic Acid Induced by Meropenem on the Antiepileptic Efficacy of Valproic Acid

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to indicate whether a declined plasma concentration of valproic acid (VPA) induced by co-administration of meropenem (MEPM) could affect the antiepileptic efficacy of VPA.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data of hospitalized patients who were diagnosed with status epilepticus or epilepsy between 2010 and 2019. Patients co-administered VPA and MEPM during hospitalization were screened and assigned to the exposure group, while those co-administerd VPA and other broad-spectrum antibiotics were allocated to the control group.

RESULTS

The exposure group and control group included 50 and 11 patients, respectively. With a similar dosage of VPA, the plasma concentration of VPA significantly decreased during co-administration (24.6 ± 4.3 μg/mL) compared with that before co-administration (88.8 ± 13.6 μg/mL, p < 0.0001), and it was partly recovered with the termination of co-administration (39.8 ± 13.2 μg/mL, p = 0.163) in the exposure group. The inverse probability of treatment weighting estimated the treatment efficacy via changes in seizure frequency, seizure duration, and concomitant use of antiepileptic drugs, which were not significantly different between the exposure and control groups. In the exposure group, there was no significant differences in seizure frequency between the periods of before-during and before-after (p = 0.074 and 0.153, respectively). Seizure duration during VPA-MEPM co-administration was not significantly different from that before co-administration (p = 0.291).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the reduced plasma concentration of VPA induced by the co-administration of MEPM did not affect the antiepileptic efficacy of VPA. This conclusion should be interpreted with caution, and more research is warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2000034567. Registered on 10 July 2020.

Evaluating Clinical Sequelae of the Carbapenem-Valproate Interaction: A Retrospective Analysis

Background

Previous studies identified a rapid decrease in valproate serum concentrations when coadministered with a carbapenem; however, the specific consequences and subsequent therapy adjustments are not well described. We aimed to investigate the clinical and therapeutic implications of the carbapenem-valproate drug-drug interaction.

Methods

This retrospective analysis included data from 2 large academic medical centers during January 2017 to June 2022. The primary outcome was incidence of seizures or behavioral events stratified by valproate indication. All adult patient encounters with concomitant administration of any carbapenem antimicrobial and valproate were included. Patients without prolonged exposure to valproate prior to hospitalization, without valproate levels pre- and post-carbapenem administration, with an admitting diagnosis of seizure, with exposure to other agents that decrease valproate concentrations, or who had a seizure during the hospitalization prior to carbapenem exposure were excluded.

Results

Two hundred fifty-eight episodes of concomitant use among 78 unique adult patients were included. Valproate was used for seizure control in 41 patients (52.6%) and for mood-related disorders in 37 (47.4%). In those prescribed valproate for its antiepileptic properties, seizures occurred following carbapenem administration in 46.3% of encounters. In those taking valproate for mood-related disorders, 50.8% met the primary endpoint of behavioral disturbance.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates significant clinical implications of the carbapenem-valproate interaction. Clinicians should be aware of this interaction and consider alternative antimicrobial and/or antiepileptic agents whenever possible. Adding or increasing doses of antiepileptic agents and/or consultation with a neurologist prior to concomitant use should be considered when this combination cannot be avoided.

Carbapenems as Antidotes for the Management of Acute Valproic Acid Poisoning

INTRODUCTION

Valproic acid (VPA) is a broad-spectrum drug primarily used in the treatment of epilepsy and bipolar disorder. It is not an uncommon occurrence for VPA to cause intoxication. The established treatment of VPA poisoning includes supportive care, multiple doses of activated charcoal, levocarnitine and hemodialysis/hemoperfusion. There is a clinically significant interaction between carbapenem antibiotics and VPA. By affecting enterohepatic recirculation, carbapenems can increase the overall VPA clearance from the blood of intoxicated patients. It is suggested that carbapenems could successfully be used as antidotes in the treatment of acute VPA poisonings.

THE AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness of carbapenems in the treatment of patients acutely poisoned by VPA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included patients acutely poisoned by VPA and treated with carbapenems at the Department of Clinical Toxicology at the Military Medicinal Academy in Serbia for a two-year period.

RESULTS

After the admission, blood concentrations of VPA kept increasing, reaching their peak at 114-724 mg/L, while the mental state of the patients continued to decline, prompting a decision to introduce carbapenems. After the introduction of carbapenems, the concentrations of the drug dropped by 46-93.59% (average 72%) followed by rapid recovery of consciousness. Ten out of eleven patients had positive outcomes, while one patient died. The most commonly observed complication in our group of patients was bronchopneumonia.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of carbapenems for the management of acute VPA poisoning might be a useful and effective treatment option.

Rescue strategies for valproic acid overdose poisoning: Case series and literature review

Valproic acid (VPA) is a wide-ranging anti-epileptic medication that primarily affects bipolar disorder, mania, and migraine. The leading causes of mortality associated with acute poisoning from VPA are nervous system toxicity, drug-induced shock due to encephalopathy from hyperammonemia, as well as acute liver and kidney failure, and respiratory depression that contribute to hemodynamic instability. Treatment of acute VPA poisoning primarily involves in vitro elimination methods, including hemoperfusion (HP), hemodialysis, and hemofiltration, as well as drug remedies such as L-carnitine and meropenem. Nonetheless, there are conflicting opinions regarding drug usage. This article details the three cases of acute poisoning from VPA. The fundamental approach to treatment employs HP assisted by blood concentration monitoring to alleviate shock and stabilize hemodynamics. This investigation presents guidance for the treatment and management of acute poisoning with VPA in clinical settings.

Determination of valproic acid and its six metabolites in human serum using LC-MS/MS and application to interaction with carbapenems in epileptic patients

Valproic acid (VPA) is a classic medication for several types of epilepsy and mood disorders, and some of its effectiveness and toxicity is associated with metabolites. Although many reports have reported the drug-drug interactions of VPA, no study has focused on the influence of carbapenems (CBPMs) on VPA's active metabolites. An LC-MS/MS method for determining VPA and its six metabolites (3-hydroxy valproic acid, 4-hydroxy valproic acid, 2-propyl-2-pentenoic acid, 2-propyl-4-pentenoic acid, 3-keto valproic acid, and 2-propylglutaric acid) in human serum was established and applied to evaluate the drug-drug interaction with CBPMs in epileptic patients. The stable isotope valproic acid-d6 was used as an internal standard. Analytes in serum samples (50 μl) were isolated using a Kinetex C₁₈ column (3 × 100 mm, 2.6 μm) and detected via negative electrospray ionization after protein precipitation. It was linear (r > 0.99) over the calibration range for different analytes. The accuracy was 91.44-110.92%, and the precision was less than 9.98%. The matrix effect, recovery, and stability met the acceptance criteria. According to the data collected from 150 epileptic patients, the concentration-dose ratio for VPA and its metabolites decreased with CBPM polytherapy. This method is simple and rapid with great accuracy and precision. It is suitable for routine clinical analysis of VPA and its metabolites in human serum.

A Retrospective Case Series of Concomitant Carbapenem and Valproic Acid Use: Are Best Practice Advisories Working?

Background: A Best Practice Advisory (BPA) warns clinicians of an interaction between carbapenems and valproic acid (VPA) that can cause significant declines in VPA levels leading to serious consequences for patients treated for seizure disorder and unknown implications for alternative indications. Objective: The goal of this study was to assess BPA efficacy in avoiding concomitant VPA/carbapenems, and to characterize use of these agents, clinical implications, and potential alternative therapeutic options. Methods: Retrospective chart review was performed on all patients over the course of 1 year who were concomitantly prescribed a carbapenem and VPA at Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT. Data collected included: level of care, duration of concomitant therapy, indications, VPA levels during or surrounding overlap, documentation of the interaction, and therapeutic implications. Results: Carbapenems and VPA were administered to 591 and 625 patients, respectively; the BPA fired 126 times in 24 patients, and 15 patients were initiated on these agents concomitantly. Eight (53%) patients received VPA for seizures. The remaining seven (47%) received VPA for alternative indications. Eight of nine VPA levels were sub-therapeutic during carbapenem therapy and polypharmacy was administered in all patients receiving VPA for non-convulsive indications. Conclusion: Co-prescribing of these drugs was rare; however, the BPA was ineffective in 63% of instances. Reductions in VPA efficacy for any indication should be expected with concomitant carbapenem administration. Antibiotics other than carbapenems should be considered when coverage of multidrug resistant Gram-negative pathogens is required in patients whose VPA treatment cannot be interrupted or switched to a therapeutic alternative.

Factors Influencing Sodium Valproate Serum Concentrations in Patients with Epilepsy Based on Logistic Regression Analysis

Background

We aimed to explore the risk factors that affect the serum concentration of sodium valproate (VPA-Na) in patients with epilepsy and to provide references for the rationale of the use of VPA-Na.

Material/Methods

The enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique was used to determine the serum VPA-NA concentrations of 109 patients, and the results were retrospectively analyzed and summarized. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to analyze substandard serum VPA-Na concentrations.

Results

Fifty-six patients (51.38%) treated with VPA-Na tablets were within the effective treatment range of 50–100 μg/mL, while 53 patients (48.62%) were out of the treatment range. The results indicated that the standard-reaching rate of serum drug concentration in the juvenile group was higher than that in the adult and elderly groups; the standard-reaching rates of serum drug concentrations in the low-dose group and the intermediate-dose group were lower than that in the high-dose group; and the standard-reaching rate of serum drug concentration in the group receiving carbapenems in combination was lower than that in the non-combination group; all differences were statistically significant. The combination with carbapenems and enzyme inducers was an independent risk factor for VPA-Na serum concentration below the target level in hospitalized patients.

Conclusions

To improve clinical efficacy and reduce the occurrence of adverse reactions, there is a need for therapeutic drug monitoring of VPA-Na. Moreover, individual administration should be implemented when VPA-Na tablets are used in the treatment of epilepsy because of the significant fluctuation in VPA-Na blood concentration.

Effect of drug interactions between carbapenems and valproate on serum valproate concentration: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Concurrent use of valproate and carbapenem antibiotics may decrease serum valproate concentration (SVC). This study evaluated the effects of carbapenem-valproate drug interactions. Research design and methods: We screened PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for eligible prospective or retrospective studies that evaluated the effect of concurrent use of carbapenem and valproate compared with valproate alone on SVC. Primary outcomes were the change in SVC from before the addition of the carbapenem to the SVC during the use of carbapenems and after carbapenem discontinuation, and seizure-related outcomes. Secondary outcomes were the influence of valproate or carbapenem dose on SVC and Drug Interaction Probability Scale scores. Results: Twelve studies (633 patients) were included. Compared with valproate alone, combination treatment with carbapenem substantially decreased mean SVC (mean difference, -43.98 mg/L; 95% confidence interval, -48.18 to -39.78). The onset of SVC decreases was within 1-3 days following carbapenem initiation. Seizure frequency increased by 26.3% during combination treatment. No difference was found in mean SVC between the different doses of valproate or carbapenem during combination treatment. Mean SVC increased to similar pre-carbapenem level within 1 to 2 weeks after carbapenem discontinuation. Conclusions: The drug interaction between valproate and carbapenem causes substantial SVC decreases, even to subtherapeutic levels, which may increase the risk of seizures.

Interactions between carbapenems and valproic acid among the patients in the intensive care units

PURPOSE

To evaluate risk factors for epileptic seizures or status epilepticus (SE) in patients concomitantly receiving valproic acid (VPA) and carbapenems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult patients in the intensive care units (ICUs) who concomitantly received VPA and carbapenems from 2007 to 2017 were included. The impacts of different carbapenems on serum concentration of VPA were compared.

RESULTS

Among 162 patients included, 104 (64.2%) and 45 (27.8%) developed epileptic seizures and SE, respectively. The risk factors for epileptic seizures were age (per year increase, adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.03), initial antiepileptic regimen (monotherapy and polytherapy, aOR, 0.43 and 0.18, respectively), and VPA serum concentration after concomitant carbapenem administration (per 1 μg/mL increase, aOR, 0.96). VPA serum concentration after concomitant carbapenem administration was an independent risk factor for SE (per μg/mL increase, aOR, 0.98). Concomitant imipenem/cilastatin administration did not significantly decrease VPA serum concentration compared to that by meropenem or ertapenem. The length of stay and number of days on ventilation after concomitant carbapenem administration in the ICUs were significantly more in those with epileptic seizures or SE.

CONCLUSIONS

Carbapenems decreased VPA serum concentration and increased the risk of epileptic seizures and SE, which led to increased length of ICU stay.

A novel analytical method to assess the effect of imipenem/cilastatin on liver function laboratory indexes in Chinese underage inpatients: Probability distribution curve

Objectives

The primary objective of this study was to establish a novel method to assess the effect of imipenem/cilastatin (IMP) on liver function laboratory indexes in Chinese underage inpatients (inpatients aged <18 year-old).

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted in 188 underage inpatients who received IMP in Xiangya Hospital from January 2016 to April 2018. Demographic data and clinical information of these inpatients were collected. As there was no reference interval of minors, the occurrence of abnormal liver function was estimated by that of adults, temporarily. A new concept (mean-variance induced by drug, MVID) was introduced to analyze the characteristics of total bilirubin (TBil), direct bilirubin (DBil), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST). Effect of MVID of TBil, DBil, ALT and AST in different patients (aged<1 year old and aged ≥ 1 year old) were compared by Mann-Whitney U test.

Results

Estimating by reference intervals of adults, 57.4% underage inpatients (108/188) had abnormal liver function. According to the probability distribution curve of MVID, IMP can cause the increase of AST in 24% (0.62–0.38) Chinese underage inpatients, and the increase of ALT in 20% (0.60–0.40) Chinese underage inpatients. And liver protecting drugs can decrease MVID of ALT and AST. There were not statistically significant differences in MVID of TBil, DBil, ALT and AST in different patients (aged<1 year old and aged ≥ 1 year old); P value was 0.711, 0.734, 0.067 and 0.086, respectively.

Conclusion

IMP can affect the liver function of 20–24% Chinese underage inpatients mainly by increasing the AST and ALT. IMP may induce hepatocellular injury, but not cholestasis. And liver protecting drugs can reverse the side effects caused by IMP. Age may not affect the effect of IMP on liver function.

The design of electronic medical records for patients of continuous care

In order to meet the ever-increasing needs of health care, as well as helping patients who need continuous care after being discharged from the hospital and making modern medical technology better serve humans, the design of electronic medical records for continuous care patients, especially those with malignant tumors, is investigated. In the research process, the idea of Browser/Server (B/S) framework is adopted, and the corresponding electronic medical record system is designed based on the targets and the overall structure of the system; afterward, the black-box testing and white-box testing are carried out to test the functions, reliability, and stability of the designed electronic medical record system; in addition, combined with other research results, the feasibility of the design is proved. It can be seen that the electronic medical record system designed for patients who need continuous care in the study is absolutely feasible, which can be further researched and improved with the development of electronic medical records; therefore, it would make greater contributions to both patients and hospitals in the future.

Prevention, Treatment, and Monitoring of Seizures in the Intensive Care Unit

The diagnosis and management of seizures in the critically ill patient can sometimes present a unique challenge for practitioners due to lack of exposure and complex patient comorbidities. The reported incidence varies between 8% and 34% of critically ill patients, with many patients often showing no overt clinical signs of seizures. Outcomes in patients with unidentified seizure activity tend to be poor, and mortality significantly increases in those who have seizure activity longer than 30 min. Prompt diagnosis and provision of medical therapy are crucial in order to attain successful seizure termination and prevent poor outcomes. In this article, we review the epidemiology and pathophysiology of seizures in the critically ill, various seizure monitoring modalities, and recommended medical therapy.

Drug-drug interactions in patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are exposed to numerous drugs in both pre- and post-transplantation period, which creates an opportunity for drug-drug interactions (DDIs); if clinically relevant DDIs happen, the risk of adverse treatment outcomes is increased. Areas covered: This review is focused on DDIs in recipients of HSCT that were observed and published as clinical trials, case series or case reports. Relevant publications were found by the systematic search of the following online databases: MEDLINE, SCOPUS, EBSCO, and SCINDEX. Expert opinion: The most important DDIs involve cytostatic or immunosuppressant drug on one side, and antimicrobial drugs on the other. The majority of clinically relevant interactions have pharmacokinetic character, involving drug metabolizing enzymes in the liver. Antifungal azoles inhibit metabolism of many cytostatic and immunosuppressant drugs at cytochromes and increase their plasma concentrations. Macrolide antibiotics and fluoroqunolones should be avoided in HSCT recipients, as they have much larger potential for DDIs than other antibiotic groups. HSCT recipients increasingly receive new immunomodulating drugs, and further observational studies are needed to reveal unsuspected DDIs with clinical relevance.

Meropenem-induced Valproic Acid Elimination: A Case Report of Clinically Relevant Drug Interaction

We present two case reports of drug interaction between valproic acid and meropenem. In comparison with expected population-kinetic based serum levels, we observed 90.8 and 93.5% decrease in valproic acid serum levels during concomitant administration with meropenem. If carbapenems need to be administered to valproic acid treated patient, other anticonvulsant addition seems to be the appropriate as most probably the valproic acid dose escalation would not be sufficient to achieve therapeutic serum concentration.