Network meta-analysis on efficacy and safety of different Janus kinase inhibitors for ulcerative colitis

Cardiovascular safety of Janus kinase inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (JAKinibs) are effective for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but their cardiovascular safety is inconclusive. We aim to assess the cardiovascular risks associated with JAKinibs in IBD patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Systematic searches of seven databases and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to February 2024 were conducted. Outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), venous thromboembolism events (VTE) and cardiovascular events (CVE), which were separately evaluated based on whether or not the dose was considered. P-score was applied to rank interventions.

RESULTS

A total of 26 trials involving 10,537 IBD patients were included, and results showed no significantly increased risk of MACE, VTE and CVE was associated with JAKinibs. However, when the dose was considered, Tofacitinib 5 mg BID (versus placebo) showed a trend towards an increased risk of MACE [odds ratio (OR)=1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.23-4.82], as well as Upadacitinib 30 mg QD (versus placebo) showed a trend towards increased risks of VTE (OR=1.36, 95% CI: 0.23-8.03) and CVE (OR=1.08, 95% CI: 0.24-4.85), and ranked higher than placebo for the risk of VTE [P-score=0.766 (versus 0.722)]. Notably, Deucravacitinib ranked lowest for all cardiovascular risks, and significantly decreased the risks of VTE (OR=0.03, 95% CI: 0.00-0.87) and CVE (OR=0.03, 95% CI: 0.00-0.87) compared with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Although a trend of increased cardiovascular risks was found considering dose, no significantly increased cardiovascular risk was associated with JAKinibs in IBD patients, and Deucravacitinib significantly decreased the risks of VTE and CVE.

Efficacy and safety of advanced therapies for moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis in induction and maintenance: systematic literature review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

Aim: Several therapies have recently been licensed for the treatment of patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). To provide comparative evidence of newly available treatments, Bayesian network meta-analyses were conducted to compare their relative efficacy and safety profiles in both the induction and maintenance phases. Materials & methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify the available literature on randomized controlled trials for advanced treatments (AT) of moderately to severely active UC. Bayesian network meta-analyses were used to synthesize evidence on prespecified efficacy and safety outcomes. Primary efficacy end points clinical response and clinical remission were measured at the end of induction and clinical response and clinical remission among induction phase responders were assessed at the end of the maintenance period. Efficacy outcomes were analyzed separately for AT-naive and -experienced populations. Safety outcomes included serious infections over the induction period, and serious infections among others over the maintenance period. Treat-through trial outcomes were adjusted to align with responder rerandomized trial outcomes. Results: The systematic review identified 58 relevant trials of which 28 met criteria for inclusion in the main analysis networks. At the end of the induction period, all treatments were efficacious against placebo for both AT-naive and AT-experienced populations. Upadacitinib 45 mg demonstrated a higher likelihood of clinical response and remission compared with other treatments. Adalimumab had less favorable performance over the induction period. Among induction phase responders, most treatments demonstrated similar efficacy at the end of the maintenance period. Tofacitinib 10 mg was more likely to achieve clinical response and remission than several other treatments in the AT-naive population. In the AT-experienced population, upadacitinib 30 mg demonstrated a higher likelihood of clinical response and remission compared with other treatments. The safety outcomes among treatments were similar. Conclusion: This study provides an updated comparison of treatments for moderately to severely active UC. Most treatments demonstrated comparable efficacy at the end of maintenance. The findings from this study can inform decision making in treatment choice for patients with moderately to severely active UC.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Three Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Ulcerative Colitis: A Real-World Multicentre Study in Japan

BACKGROUND

Three Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are approved for ulcerative colitis (UC) in Japan.

AIM

To compare the real-world efficacy and safety of these three JAK inhibitors in UC.

METHODS

This was a multicentre, retrospective study of patients with UC started on JAK inhibitors. The primary outcome was clinical remission at 10, 26 and 58 weeks, and at the most recent follow-up. To compare the efficacy and safety among the JAK inhibitors, we created three matched cohorts (upadacitinib vs. filgotinib, tofacitinib vs. filgotinib and upadacitinib vs. tofacitinib) using propensity score matching.

RESULTS

We identified 228 upadacitinib-treated patients (median follow-up 49 weeks; IQR 25-72), 215 filgotinib-treated patients (follow-up 56 weeks; IQR 17-82) and 159 tofacitinib-treated patients (follow-up 112 weeks; IQR 10-258). Clinical remission rates for upadacitinib, filgotinib and tofacitinib at the most recent follow-up were 72.8%, 50.6% and 45.8%, respectively. Over 70% of the patients previously treated with other biologics or JAK inhibitors achieved clinical remission with upadacitinib. On multivariate analysis, the number of previous advanced therapies was inversely associated with the efficacy of filgotinib and tofacitinib. Comparative analysis showed that upadacitinib-treated patients had higher efficacy and lower risk of discontinuation than patients treated with other JAK inhibitors. However, upadacitinib had a significant risk of acne.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the particularly high efficacy of upadacitinib, even in patients with refractory UC, filgotinib or tofacitinib may be considered as an upfront JAK inhibitor before using upadacitinib.

Real-World Data on the Effectiveness and Safety of Filgotinib for Ulcerative Colitis in Japanese Patients: A Single-Center Experience

Introduction Filgotinib is a JAK-1 selective inhibitor approved for ulcerative colitis (UC) treatment in Japan. Its effectiveness has been confirmed but remains unknown in actual clinical practice. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of filgotinib and identify suitable patients in the Japanese population. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the background, clinical course, and laboratory data of patients treated with filgotinib 200 mg for UC between May 2022 and December 2023. Results The median observation period for the 25 patients was 232 days (interquartile ranges (IQR) 102-405). The median age of the patients was 43 years (IQR 29-55), disease duration was nine years (IQR 2-12), and 36% (9/25) of patients were biologic or small molecule naïve. The median patient-reported outcome (PRO2) and partial Mayo (pMayo) scores at agent initiation were 3 (IQR 1-4) and 4.5 (IQR 3-6), respectively. The PRO2 and pMayo scores improved significantly two weeks after treatment initiation (p < 0.05). Clinical remission rates at 24 weeks after treatment initiation were 60% (15/25) for PRO2 ≤ 1 and 52% (13/25) for pMayo ≤ 1. The Mayo endoscopic subscore significantly improved after filgotinib initiation (p=0.04), and the endoscopic remission rate was 47% (8/17). At 24 weeks, patients in clinical remission, compared to those not in remission, had significantly lower baseline PRO2 and pMayo scores and longer disease duration (p=0.03, p=0.03, and p=0.04, respectively). The filgotinib persistence rate was 68% (17/25), with no discontinuation because of adverse events. Patients who continued treatment had significantly lower PRO2, pMayo scores, and blood neutrophil counts at initiation than those who discontinued (p=0.02, p=0.03, and p=0.02, respectively). Conclusion Filgotinib appears to be effective and safe in Japanese patients with UC. Effectiveness and persistence were high in patients whose PRO2 and pMayo scores were low at the time of treatment initiation.

The role of filgotinib in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease

Filgotinib is an oral small molecule that selectively inhibits JAK1. It is already approved for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). Ongoing studies are evaluating the efficacy and safety of filgotinib in Crohn's disease (CD). The purpose of this review is to summarize the available data regarding filgotinib in the management of UC and CD. We used Pubmed, Embase and clinicaltrials.gov websites to search all available data and currently ongoing studies regarding the efficacy and safety of filgotinib in inflammatory bowel diseases. Filgotinib is an effective and safe drug for the management of biologic-naive and biologic-experienced patients with moderate-to-severe UC. The same efficacy results have not been achieved in CD.

Safety of Upadacitinib in Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: Systematic Literature Review of Indirect and Direct Treatment Comparisons of Randomized Controlled Trials

INTRODUCTION

Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), non-radiographic axial spondylarthritis (nr-axSpA), atopic dermatitis (AD), ulcerative colitis (UC), and Crohn's disease (CD) pose a substantial burden on patients and their quality of life. Upadacitinib is an orally administered, selective, and reversible Janus kinase inhibitor indicated for seven conditions, but data on its safety versus other active treatments are limited. A systematic literature review of indirect and direct treatment comparisons of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to assess the safety profile of upadacitinib.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for indirect and direct treatment comparisons of RCTs that (1) included licensed upadacitinib dosages; (2) studied any of the seven conditions; (3) reported any adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), AEs leading to discontinuation, major adverse cardiovascular event, venous thromboembolism, malignancies, infections or serious infections, and death; and (4) were published between January 2018 and August 2022.

RESULTS

A total of 25 studies were eligible for inclusion. SAEs, AEs leading to discontinuation, and any AEs were commonly studied. RA was the most studied condition, followed by AD and UC. Most studies (16/25, 64%) reported no statistically significant difference in the studied safety outcomes between upadacitinib and other active treatments (e.g., tumor necrosis factor blockers, interleukin receptor antagonists, integrin receptor antagonists, T cell co-stimulation modulator), or placebo (placebo ± methotrexate or topical corticosteroids). Other studies (9/25, 36%) reported mixed results of no statistically significant difference and either statistically higher (8/25, 32%) or lower rates (1/25, 4%) on upadacitinib.

CONCLUSION

Most studies suggested that upadacitinib has no statistically significant difference in the studied safety outcomes compared to active treatments or placebo in patients with RA, PsA, AS, AD, UC, and CD. A few studies reported higher rates, but findings were inconsistent with limited interpretation.

Management of Specific Clinical Profiles in Axial Spondyloarthritis: An Expert's Document Based on a Systematic Literature Review and Extended Delphi Process

INTRODUCTION

The management of specific clinical scenarios is not adequately addressed in national and international guidelines for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Expert opinions could serve as a valuable complement to these documents.

METHODS

Seven expert rheumatologists identified controversial areas or gaps of current recommendations for the management of patients with axSpA. A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed to analyze the efficacy and safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids, conventional synthetic, biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs, b/tsDMARDs) in axSpA regarding controversial areas or gaps. In a nominal group meeting, the results of the SLR were discussed and a set of statements were proposed. A Delphi process inviting 150 rheumatologists was followed to define the final statements. Agreement was defined as if at least 70% of the participants voted ≥ 7 (from 1, totally disagree, to 10, totally agree).

RESULTS

Three overarching principles and 17 recommendations were generated. All reached agreement. According to them, axSpA care should be holistic and individualized, taking into account objective findings, comorbidities, and patients' opinions and preferences. Integrating imaging and clinical assessment with biomarker analysis could also help in decision-making. Connected to treatments, in refractory enthesitis, b/tsDMARDs are recommended. If active peripheral arthritis, csDMARD might be considered before b/tsDMARDs. The presence of significant structural damage, long disease duration, or HLA-B27-negative status do not contraindicate for the use of b/tsDMARDs.

CONCLUSIONS

These recommendations are intended to complement guidelines by helping health professionals address and manage specific groups of patients, particular clinical scenarios, and gaps in axSpA.

Oral small molecule agents in management of ulcerative colitis: fact or fancy?

Ulcerative colitis is a chronic, immune-mediated disease characterized by recurring episodes of mucosal inflammation in the colon and rectum. The primary pathogenic mechanism of ulcerative colitis is the dysregulation of the mucosal immune response. The disease follows a relapsing-remitting course, and the goal of management is to successfully induce and then maintain remission. Effectively managing this chronic disease requires addressing all aspects of it. Currently, we have various antitumor necrosis factor agents and novel biologics available for treating ulcerative colitis patients with moderate-to-severe disease. However, none of the existing treatments are considered entirely satisfactory or ideal in these cases. After extensive progressive research, oral small molecule therapies targeting mediators of ongoing inflammation represent an exciting and revolutionary change in the treatment of ulcerative colitis, especially for patients with moderate-to-severe disease. In this review, we aimed to summarize the available experience and ongoing research on oral small molecule agents in the management of ulcerative colitis. The available experience and ongoing research with promising outcomes provide convincing evidence that the value of oral small molecule agents is fact not fancy.

Filgotinib for moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis

INTRODUCTION

Filgotinib is an oral Janus kinase type 1 (JAK1) selective inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy and safety in ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this review is to summarize the available evidence on pharmacological characteristics, efficacy, and safety of filgotinib in UC.

AREAS COVERED

Pubmed, Scopus, and Embase databases were searched for all relevant studies reporting the efficacy and safety of filgotinib in patients with moderate to severe UC. We particularly focused on the risk of zoster infection and venous thromboembolism compared to other JAK inhibitors.

EXPERT OPINION

Filgotinib has remarkable efficacy, safety, and tolerability profiles in the treatment of moderate-to-severe active UC. It can be used in both biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced patients. The rapid mechanism of action and its oral administration route make it a reliable therapeutic option.