Autoantibodies against TIF-1-γ and CADM-140 in Spanish patients with clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis (CADM): clinical significance and diagnostic utility

Clinical features of dermatomyositis patients with anti-TIF1 antibodies: A case based comprehensive review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Dermatomyositis is chronic autoimmune disease primarily affecting skin and muscles. Antibodies are key players of pathogenesis and are in strong correlation with distinct clinical phenotypes. We present a case and a comprehensive review of the literature on dermatomyositis patients with Anti TIF1 antibodies.

METHODS

PubMed and Web of Science databases were reviewed. 166 articles were identified; 95 of them were evaluated; 79 of them included to the study. 45 of the included articles were case reports 9 were case series and 25 were research articles. In total 1065 patients were identified but number of patients with available information for different clinical features varied.

RESULTS

69.6% of the patients with Anti TIF1-γ were female. Prevalence of malignancy was 42.6% among patients with Anti TIF1-γ. Muscle weakness (83%), Gottron sign (82.2%), heliotrope rash (73.7%), nailfold capillary changes (67.7%), dysphagia (38.4%), and joint involvement (31.1%) were the most common clinical features seen in patients with Anti TIF1-γ. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) was reported among 8.7% of patients with Anti TIF1-γ. Advanced age, male gender, dysphagia, and V-neck rash were significant risk factors for malignancy, whereas juvenile age, ILD, TIF1-β antibodies and joint involvement were associated with a decreased risk for malignancy. Advanced age, malignancy, dysphagia, and muscle involvement were associated with an increased risk for mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with advanced age, male gender, dysphagia, and V-neck rash require strict cancer screening. Patients with advanced age, malignancy, dysphagia, and muscle involvement have poor prognosis and should receive aggressive treatment.

High-Dimensional Analysis Reveals Distinct Endotypes in Patients With Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies

The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are a rare clinically heterogeneous group of conditions affecting the skin, muscle, joint, and lung in various combinations. While myositis specific autoantibodies are well described, we postulate that broader immune endotypes exist in IIM spanning B cell, T cell, and monocyte compartments. This study aims to identify immune endotypes through detailed immunophenotyping of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in IIM patients compared to healthy controls. We collected PBMCs from 17 patients with a clinical diagnosis of inflammatory myositis and characterized the B, T, and myeloid cell subsets using mass cytometry by time of flight (CyTOF). Data were analyzed using a combination of the dimensionality reduction algorithm t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE), cluster identification, characterization, and regression (CITRUS), and marker enrichment modeling (MEM); supervised biaxial gating validated populations identified by these methods to be differentially abundant between groups. Using these approaches, we identified shared immunologic features across all IIM patients, despite different clinical features, as well as two distinct immune endotypes. All IIM patients had decreased surface expression of RP105/CD180 on B cells and a reduction in circulating CD3+CXCR3+ subsets relative to healthy controls. One IIM endotype featured CXCR4 upregulation across all cellular compartments. The second endotype was hallmarked by an increased frequency of CD19+CD21loCD11c+ and CD3+CD4+PD1+ subsets. The experimental and analytical methods we describe here are broadly applicable to studying other immune-mediated diseases (e.g., autoimmunity, immunodeficiency) or protective immune responses (e.g., infection, vaccination).

Clinical Characteristics and Management of Patients With Clinical Amyopathic Dermatomyositis: A Retrospective Study of 64 Patients at a Tertiary Dermatology Department

Background: Clinical amyopathic dermatomyositis (CADM) represents a subtype of 5–20% of patients with dermatomyositis (DM), which can be categorized into amyopathic dermatomyositis (ADM) and hypomyopathic dermatomyositis (HDM). The characteristics of patients with CADM are still limited in English literature.

Objective: To investigate clinical features, cutaneous findings, diagnostic accuracy, and treatment regimen of CADM patients.

Methods: Sixty-four patients diagnosed with CADM at Peking Union Medical College Hospital by dermatologists were retrospectively analyzed. Data were recorded in the electronic database at each offline clinical consultation and directly extracted from medical records. 2017 EULAR/ACR criteria for idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIM) classification was used to identify and classify patients with CADM. Published studies were searched to extract relevant data of CADM patients.

Results: This cohort included 38 ADM patients and 26 HDM patients. 2017 EULAR/ACR criteria classified 67.2% of patients with CADM into probable or definite DM. Antimalarials were given to a majority of CADM patients (72.6%, n = 45). However, 68.8% (31 out of 45) required at least one aggressive agent combined with hydroxychloroquine due to insufficient response or side effects. The median of systemic treatments in HDM was significantly higher than ADM (p = 0.007). The number of ADM patients using antimalarials as monotherapy was significantly higher than that of HDM patients (p = 0.031), while the number of HDM patients receiving steroids combined with immunosuppressants was significantly higher (p = 0.025). The median of Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) score improvement was 11.5 and 10.5 for ADM and HDM after a median follow-up of 31.5 and 32.5 months, respectively. Six patients with normal muscle strength developed muscle weakness after a median of 10.5 months (IQR 9-13), and elevated inflammatory markers at initial visit might indicate their muscle weakness development.

Conclusions: 32.8% of patients may be overlooked using the three skin variables of 2017 EULAR/ACR criteria. The response rate to single hydroxychloroquine in our cohort was 68.8%. Detailed treatment modalities were different among ADM and HDM. Long-term monitoring for the development of myositis in patients with CADM, especially those with elevated inflammatory markers at initial visit, may be warranted.

Clinical and histopathological features of adult patients with dermatomyositis and MDA5 autoantibody seropositivity status, as determined by commercial-based testing: A retrospective, single-institution comparative cohort study

BACKGROUND

Although MDA-5 autoantibodies are widely explored in dermatomyositis (DM), most studies relied on MDA-5 autoantibody testing performed in research settings and not with the now-available commercial laboratory tests.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the clinical and histopathologic data in patients with DM and circulating MDA5-autoantibodies, as defined by commercial-based testing.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients with DM who underwent MDA-5 antibody testing. All available skin biopsy slides were reviewed.

RESULTS

Cutaneous features more prevalent in MDA-5 positive DM included Raynaud syndrome (p <0.0001), cutaneous ulcerations (p=0.013), mechanic hands (p=0.0164), palmar papules (p=0.004), oral ulcers (p=0.024) and alopecia (p= 0.027). Joint and pulmonary involvement were more frequently in patients with MDA-5 positive DM (both p<0.0001) as was dysphagia (p=0.0029). Myopathy (p=0.404) and malignancy (p=0.342) were not statistically different between the cohorts. Vasculopathy was more frequent in MDA-5 positive DM (p=0.005), while spongiosis was less (p=0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

This study not only confirmed some known associations between disease manifestations and MDA-5 autoantibody status, as determined by commercially-available testing, but also identified new associations, including Raynaud syndrome and dysphagia.

Geographical Latitude Remains as an Important Factor for the Prevalence of Some Myositis Autoantibodies: A Systematic Review

The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are characterized by muscular weakness, cutaneous manifestations, muscle damage revealed by increase of muscular enzymes, muscle biopsy, electromyography and changes on magnetic resonance imaging. However, the hallmark of these IIM, is the development of myositis specific antibodies (MSA) or myositis associated antibodies (MAA). The theories about their presence in the serum of IIM is not known. Some studies have suggested that some of these MSA, such as anti-Mi-2 increases according to the intensity of UV radiation. There is scarce information about the environmental factors that might contribute in order to be considered as triggering factors as UV radiation might be. In this review, we analyzed the reported prevalence of MSAs and MAAs regarding to their geographical location and the possible relation with UV radiation. We collected the prevalence data of fifteen MSA and thirteen MAA from 22 countries around the world and we were able to observe a difference in prevalence between countries and continents. We found differences in anti-PL7, anti-Ro52, anti-La and anti-Ku prevalence according to UV radiation level. Otherwise, we observed that anti-Mi-2 prevalence increases near to the Equator meanwhile anti-MJ/NXP2 and anti-ARS prevalence had an opposite behavior increasing their prevalence in the geographical locations farther to the Equator. Our results highlighted the importance to include the UV radiation and other environmental factors in IIM studies, in order to clarify its association with MSA and MAA prevalence as well as its possible role in the immunopathogenesis of these diseases.

Anti-MDA5 antibody as a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in patients with dermatomyositis

The presence of anti-MDA5 antibodies in serum represents an important biomarker in the diagnosis and prediction of prognosis for patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs). Due to conflicting results that have been reported regarding the detection of anti-MDA5 antibodies, the goal of this study was to assess a potential association between the presence of anti-MDA5 antibodies and dermatomyositis/polymyositis (DM/PM), as well as the diagnostic and prognostic values of anti-MDA5 antibodies for DM/PM. For this, a review of literature published prior to October 15, 2016 was conducted. Eight studies with 286 PM patients and 216 healthy controls and nine studies with 628 DM patients and 221 healthy controls were selected according to specific inclusion criteria. The outcomes of these studies revealed that the presence of anti-MDA5 antibodies was associated with DM, especially CADM, and not with PM. Furthermore, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.62 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.52–0.70), 1.00 (95% CI: 0.97–1.00), and 0.9381 for CADM patients versus healthy controls when an immunoprecipitation method was used. The presence of anti-MDA5 antibodies was also found to be significantly associated with an increased risk of death in DM (relative risk = 3.32, 95% CI: 1.65–6.67, P = 0.001). These findings suggest that anti-MDA5 antibodies correlate with DM and could be used as a biomarker in the clinical diagnosis of CADM. The presence of anti-MDA5 antibodies was also associated with poor prognosis regarding the overall survival of patients with DM.

Assessment of anti-MDA5 antibody as a diagnostic biomarker in patients with dermatomyositis-associated interstitial lung disease or rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease

Anti-melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA5) antibody have been found in dermatomyositis (DM)-associated interstitial lung disease (DM-ILD) and DM-associated rapidly progressive ILD (DM-RPILD). Due to the conflicting results regarding the association between anti-MDA5 antibody and DM-ILD or DM-RPILD and the diagnostic value of this antibody for DM-ILD and DM-RPILD, we performed this meta-analysis. A systematic search was performed to identify studies published to January 14, 2017. Sixteen publications with 491 DM with ILD versus 605 DM without ILD, as well as eighteen publications with 186 DM with RPILD and 790 DM without RPILD were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) values of anti-MDA5 antibody for DM-ILD were 0.47 (95% CI: 0.37-0.57), 0.96 (95% CI, 0.92-0.97), and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.88-0.93), respectively, with a low sensitivity value. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77-0.88), 0.86 (95% CI: 0.80-0.91), and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.84-0.90) for DM with RPILD versus without RPILD with good sensitivity and specificity values. Trial sequential analysis showed sufficient evidence to support that anti-MDA5 antibody was associated with DM-ILD and DM-RPILD. The statistical power of this study calculated using G*Power version 3.1.9.2 was more than 99% (α = 0.05). Taken together, these findings suggest that anti-MDA5 antibody has a potential useful ability as a noninvasive biomarker in the diagnosis of RPILD in patients with DM.

Neuromuscular issues in systemic disease

The neuromuscular system can be involved in several systemic conditions. Clinical manifestations can appear at onset or throughout the course of the disease process. New investigational methods, including imaging of peripheral nerves, new laboratory tests, and antibodies, are available. In addition to symptomatic therapies, specific treatment options, such as for familial amyloid neuropathy and Fabry's disease, are becoming increasingly available. Pathomechanisms vary depending on the underlying disease process. In addition to metabolic, hormonal, immune, and antibody-mediated mechanisms, in some generalized diseases, genetic causes need to be considered. This review focuses on different aspects of the peripheral nervous system including the nerve roots, plexuses, mononeuropathies and generalized neuropathies, neuromuscular junction disorders, muscle, and autonomic nervous system.

A case of sarcoidosis with interstitial lung disease mimicking clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis and rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease

Here, we report a patient with sarcoidosis who developed edematous erythema and interstitial lung disease. At the initial visit, clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis (CADM) with rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD) was suspected because he had progressive dyspnea but no muscle weakness. The presence of anti-CADM-140/MDA5 autoantibodies was immediately assessed to facilitate a precise diagnosis, with negative results. Thereafter, skin and transbronchial lung biopsies revealed noncaseating granuloma with Langhans giant cells in both specimens, leading to a diagnosis of sarcoidosis. In this case, clinical features of skin and lung were unable to distinguish DM (including CADM) from sarcoidosis, but the lack of anti-CADM-140/MDA5 antibody was useful for differentiating CADM with RP-ILD mimicking sarcoidosis from bona fide sarcoidosis.