The spectrum of cutaneous adverse events during encorafenib and binimetinib treatment in B‐rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma‐mutated advanced melanoma

Cutaneous Adverse Events of Systemic Melanoma Treatments: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis

Recent progress in the treatment of advanced melanoma has led to the improved survival of affected patients. However, novel treatments also lead to considerable and distinct skin toxicity. To further characterize cutaneous adverse events (AE) of systemic treatments, we conducted a single-center retrospective study of biopsy-proven cutaneous adverse events of melanoma treatment over a period of 10 years at the University Hospital of Zurich, Switzerland. In 102 identified patients, 135 individual skin AEs developed. Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) was causal for 81 skin AEs, and 54 were related to targeted therapies (TT). Recorded types of skin AEs included lichenoid, maculopapular, acneiform, urticarial, panniculitis, folliculitis, psoriasiform, granulomatous, eczematous, and others. The incidence of skin AEs was higher with TT (18.54%) than with ICB (9.64%, p = 0.0029). Most AEs were low-grade, although 19.21% of AEs were common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) Grades 3 or 4. A large spectrum of skin AEs was documented during treatment of advanced melanoma, and distinct phenotypes were observed, depending on treatment classes. AEs occurred earlier during treatment with TT than with ICB, and distinct types of skin AEs were associated with respective treatment classes. This study comprehensively describes skin AEs occurring during systemic treatment for melanoma at a single center.

Targeting the epigenome in malignant melanoma: Facts, challenges and therapeutic promises

Malignant melanoma is the most lethal type of skin cancer with high rates of mortality. Although current treatment options provide a short-clinical benefit, acquired-drug resistance highlights the low 5-year survival rate among patients with advanced stage of the disease. In parallel, the involvement of an aberrant epigenetic landscape, (e.g., alterations in DNA methylation patterns, histone modifications marks and expression of non-coding RNAs), in addition to the genetic background, has been also associated with the onset and progression of melanoma. In this review article, we report on current therapeutic options in melanoma treatment with a focus on distinct epigenetic alterations and how their reversal, by specific drug compounds, can restore a normal phenotype. In particular, we concentrate on how single and/or combinatorial therapeutic approaches have utilized epigenetic drug compounds in being effective against malignant melanoma. Finally, the role of deregulated epigenetic mechanisms in promoting drug resistance to targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors is presented leading to the development of newly synthesized and/or improved drug compounds capable of targeting the epigenome of malignant melanoma.

Drugs Associated With the Development of Palmoplantar Keratoderma: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Palmoplantar keratoderma (PPK) are a heterogenous group of hereditary and acquired disorders that are characterized by excessive epidermal thickening of the palms and/or soles. PPK has been described as a rare adverse event for some medications. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize outcomes in PPK associated with various medications. This data will assist dermatologists and other healthcare providers treating patients with drug-induced PPK.

METHODS

EMBASE and MEDLINE databases were searched in accordance with PRISMA guidelines using the keyword "palmoplantar keratoderma." 40 studies met the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 247 patients (mean age: 57.0 years) were included in the analysis. Among patients whose sex was reported, 60.3% (n = 35/58) were male. PPK most frequently developed after treatment with BRAF inhibitors (73.7%, n = 182/247), BRAF inhibitors combined with MEK1/2 inhibitors (15.4%, n = 38/247), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (3.2%, n = 8/247), or chemotherapy (2.4%, n = 6/247). The mean latency period between initiation of the drug and onset of PPK was 7.6 months (range: 0.25-90 months). Improvement of PPK was reported in 24 cases, with 50% (n = 12/24) achieving complete resolution and 50% (n = 12/24) achieving partial resolution. All patients who achieved complete resolution stopped the suspected drug, with a mean resolution period of 2.4 months (range: 2 weeks-6 months). The most common treatments for PPK were keratolytic treatments (n = 10) and topical corticosteroids (n = 4).

CONCLUSIONS

PPK was most frequently associated with targeted kinase inhibitors, specifically BRAF, MEK1/2, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Toxicity of combined targeted therapy and concurrent radiotherapy in metastatic melanoma patients: a single-center retrospective analysis

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group consensus guidelines from 2016 recommend interruption of targeted therapy with BRAF- and MEK-inhibitors during radiotherapy with data being based mostly on BRAF monotherapy. The aim of this study is to provide data on the safety of concurrent radiotherapy and combination targeted therapy with BRAF- and MEK-inhibitors. A total of 32 patients with 51 sessions of radiotherapy from one center receiving concurrent radiotherapy and BRAF- and MEK- inhibitors were included. Radiotherapy-associated toxicities were retrospectively collected. Incidence was compared between three groups: (A) targeted therapy during radiotherapy with and, (B) without interruption, and (C) radiotherapy before the start of targeted therapy. Survival and local disease control were examined. Targeted therapy was interrupted during radiotherapy in 16, not interrupted in 14, and only started after radiotherapy in 21 sessions. Stereotactic radiotherapy was applied in 28 sessions, conventionally fractionated radiotherapy in 23. The brain was the most common site of irradiation (n = 36). Radiotherapy-associated toxicities occurred in 41.2% (n = 21) of sessions and did not differ significantly among the groups. Overall survival was 11.7 months and progression-free survival was 8.4 months. No increase in radiotherapy-associated toxicity was seen where combination targeted therapy was not interrupted during radiotherapy. Prospective clinical trials are warranted to support our findings.

Hyperkeratotic Skin Adverse Events Induced by Anticancer Treatments: A Comprehensive Review

Hyperkeratotic skin adverse events are a group of toxic effects, characterized by the disruption of epidermal homeostasis and interaction with keratinocyte proliferation/differentiation or keratinocyte survival, and frequently reported with systemic anticancer treatments. These types of reactions include hand-foot skin reaction or palmoplantar keratoderma, induced psoriasis, keratosis pilaris-like or pityriasis rubra pilaris-like rashes, Grover's disease, and contact hyperkeratosis. Cutaneous squamoproliferative lesions are also described because of the presence of abnormal keratinocyte proliferation. They are usually observed with tyrosine kinase inhibitors but have also been described in association with cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents. Their pathogenesis is related mainly to the disruption of epidermal homeostasis and interaction with keratinocyte proliferation/differentiation or keratinocyte survival caused by anticancer treatment. Early recognition and adequate management are critical to prevent exacerbation of the lesions, to limit treatment interruption, and to minimize impairment of quality of life. This review summarizes the current knowledge concerning the presentation, pathogenesis, and management of secondary hyperkeratotic reactions to anticancer therapies. It also includes hyperkeratotic reactions that have been more recently described with newly approved targeted therapies or immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as keratosis pilaris-like exanthema with second-generation BCR-ABL inhibitors, lamellar ichthyosis-like lesions with ponatinib, pityriasis rubra pilaris with the newly approved selective phosphoinositide 3 kinase inhibitor idelalisib, or psoriasis with anti-programmed death-1 and programmed death ligand-1.

[Management of toxicities of BRAF inhibitors and MEK inhibitors in advanced melanoma]

Major therapeutic advances have been made recently in the treatment of metastatic melanoma, due to the development of targeted therapies, namely BRAF and MEK inhibitors, in patients with BRAF V600 mutation. Combinations of vemurafenib+cobimetinib, dabrafenib+trametinib, et encorafenib+binimetinib, evaluated in coBRIM, COMBI-d/COMBI-v and COLUMBUS trials respectively have been approved in this indication. Toxicities induced by combination therapies are different from those reported with monotherapies, in terms of frequency and intensity. Physicians who treat melanoma patients thus face news issues relating to prevention, detection and treatment of these adverse events. This paper summarizes tolerance data from the three pivotal trials (coBRIM, COMBI-v and COLUMBUS) and issues recommendations for the specific management of main toxicities, based on experts' opinion. We discuss dermatological, ophthalmological, cardiovascular, digestive, musculoskeletal, renal and general toxicities and propose a timetable for examinations to be performed before and during treatment.

BRAF mutation and its inhibitors in sarcoma treatment

The mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway plays a significant role in mediating cellular physiological activities, such as proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and senescence. This signaling pathway is composed of several major proto‐oncogenes of RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK, among which the BRAF proto‐oncogene, as one of the three members of the RAF family, has a higher mutation rate than ARAF and CRAF and has attracted extensive attention. Regarding the BRAF mutation, approximately 95% of BRAF mutations belong to the BRAF V600E mutation, which can enhance the expression of the MAPK signaling pathway and is thus related to the occurrence and development of various malignant tumors and has been successfully identified as a therapeutic target. Moreover, drug resistance to BRAF inhibitor treatment also appears to be an important issue. Considering the successful use of BRAF inhibitors in melanoma, we provide a brief overview of the BRAF mutations, including their basic structures and activation mechanisms, and the new classification method for BRAF mutations. Most importantly, we summarize the results of BRAF inhibitor treatment in different sarcomas. To overcome drug resistance to BRAF inhibitor treatment, we also outline the different mechanisms of drug resistance to BRAF inhibitor treatment and introduce the combination strategy of BRAF inhibitors with other targeted therapies.

Evolving management of positive regional lymph nodes in melanoma: Past, present and future directions

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has become the standard of care for lymph node staging in melanoma and the most important predictor of survival in clinically node-negative disease. Previous guidelines recommend completion lymph node dissection (CLND) in cases of positive SLN; however, the lymph nodes recovered during CLND are only positive in a minority of these cases. Recent evidence suggests that conservative management (i.e. observation) has similar outcomes compared to CLND. We sought to review the most current literature regarding the management of SLN in metastatic melanoma and to discuss potential future directions.

Severe Drug-Induced Liver Injury from Combination Encorafenib/Binimetinib

Encorafenib/binimetinib is a new combination BRAF/MEK inhibitor used in the treatment of advanced or metastatic BRAFV600-mutant melanoma. Though generally tolerated well, mild to moderate aminotransferase elevations are common. However, significant liver injury has not been demonstrated in the literature. Here, we report the first case of severe hepatic injury associated with encorafenib/binimetinib in a 58-year-old gentleman requiring admission and extensive workup. He was successfully treated by withdrawing the combination therapy, and liver function returned to normal range.

Clinical outcomes of BRAF plus MEK inhibition in melanoma: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Background

Melanoma is a potentially fatal malignancy with poor prognosis. Several recent studies have demonstrated that combination therapy of BRAF and MEK inhibition achieved better curative effect and appeared less toxic effects. We conducted a meta‐analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety between BRAF inhibition plus MEK inhibition combination therapy and BRAF inhibition monotherapy in melanoma patients.

Methods

We performed the search in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from January 2010 to January 2019. Inclusion and exclusion of studies, assessment of quality, outcome measures, data extraction, and synthesis were independently accomplished by two reviewers. Revman 5.3 software was used for the meta‐analysis.

Results

Totally, seven randomized controlled trials involving 3146 patients met our inclusion criteria. Comparing the results of combination therapy and monotherapy, combination therapy significantly improved OS (RR = 1.13; 95% CI, 1.08, 1.19; P < 0.00001), ORR (RR = 1.36; 95% CI, 1.28, 1.45; P < 0.00001), PFS (RR = 0.57; 95% CI, 0.52, 0.63; P < 0.00001) and reduced deaths (RR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.69, 0.88; P < 0.0001). Skin‐related adverse events such as hyperkeratosis, cutaneous squamous‐cell carcinoma were less compared with monotherapy. However, gastrointestinal events like nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting were at a higher frequency.

Conclusion

Doublet BRAF and MEK inhibition achieved better survival outcomes over single‐agent BRAF inhibition and occurred less skin‐related events, but gastrointestinal events were more in combination therapy.

Systemic Therapies for Advanced Melanoma

The incidence of metastatic melanoma continues to increase each decade. Although surgical treatment is often curative for localized stage I and stage II disease, the median survival for patients with distant metastases is less than 1 year. The last 2 decades have witnessed a breakthrough in therapeutic options with the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors, small molecule targeted therapy, and oncolytic viral therapy. This article provides an overview of the treatment options available for advanced melanoma, including chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, interleukin-2, and oncolytic viral agents.

Tolerability of BRAF/MEK inhibitor combinations: adverse event evaluation and management

The inhibition of the mitogen-activated protein kinases signalling pathway through combined use of BRAF and MEK inhibitors (BRAFi+MEKi) represents an established therapeutic option in patients with BRAF-mutated, advanced melanoma. These efficient therapies are well tolerated with mostly moderate and reversible side effects and a discontinuation rate due to adverse events of 11.5%-15.7%. Median duration of therapy ranges between 8.8 and 11.7 months. Based on data from confirmatory trials, safety profiles of three BRAFi+MEKi combinations were reviewed, that is, dabrafenib plus trametinib, vemurafenib plus cobimetinib and encorafenib plus binimetinib. Many adverse events are class effects, such as cutaneous, gastrointestinal, ocular, cardiac and musculoskeletal events; some adverse events are substance associated. Fever (dabrafenib) and photosensitivity (vemurafenib) are the most common and clinically prominent examples. Other adverse events are less frequent and the association to one substance is less strong such as anaemia, facial paresis (encorafenib), neutropenia (dabrafenib), skin rash, QTc prolongation and increased liver function tests (vemurafenib). This narrative review provides recommendations for monitoring, adverse event evaluation and management focusing on the clinically relevant side effects of the three regimens.