Progression of health-related quality of life of patients waiting for total knee arthroplasty

Implication of Preoperative Intravenous Dexamethasone on Pain and Nausea in Late-Stage Elderly Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients: a randomized double-blind trial

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a standard procedure in elderly patients; however, postoperative pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) remain challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a single preoperative intravenous dose of dexamethasone (10 mg) on postoperative pain and PONV in older patients (≥ 75 years) undergoing TKA.

METHODS

A single-center, double-blind, two-arm study compared preoperative dexamethasone (10 mg) versus saline on postoperative pain and PONV in planned TKA patients over 75 years old. Subjects received multimodal analgesia, including femoral nerve block, cyclooxygenase inhibitors, local anesthetic infiltration, and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with opioids. The primary outcomes were resting numeric rating scale (NRS) score and incidence of PONV at 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included motion pain scores, opioid consumption, nausea severity, blood glucose, inflammatory factors, and side effects.

RESULTS

There were 160 patients randomized; 153 completed the allocated interventions (dexamethasone n = 77, control n = 76). At 24 hours postoperatively, the dexamethasone group had a lower median resting NRS score (4 [IQR (interquartile range) 3 to 4] versus 5 [IQR 4 to 6], P < 0.001) and a lower incidence of PONV (16.9 versus 40.8%, P = 0.002) compared with controls. Select secondary outcomes showed significantly lower motion pain scores (24 hours, 36 hours, and one week) and reduced serum IL-6 and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in the dexamethasone group (all P < 0.05). No significant difference was noted in total opioid consumption, rescue analgesics, or incidence of infection and delayed wound healing between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative administration of 10 mg intravenous dexamethasone to relatively healthy late-stage elderly patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status I to II) undergoing TKA significantly reduced postoperative pain and PONV without increasing wound complications or infections. However, caution should be exercised when extrapolating these results to more comorbid populations, and further research is needed to assess long-term outcomes and broader applicability.

Continuous femoral nerve block as pain management following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The present systematic review evaluated the current level of I evidence on continuous femoral nerve block (FNB) as pain management following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), comparing different drugs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study followed the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were accessed in November 2024. All clinical studies concerning continuous FNB for pain management following TKA were considered.

RESULTS

Data from 22 RCTs were retrieved. The drugs included in the analyses were levobupivacaine, bupivacaine and ropivacaine in isolation or combined with prilocaine or dexmedetomidine. A statistically significant difference was found in VAS at rest in postoperative day (POD) 0 (p < 0.01): the bupivacaine group demonstrated the highest values, and the ropivacaine combined with dexmedetomidine group had the lowest values. No other statistically significant difference in VAS at rest was found for any group in POD 1, 2, and 3 (p = 0.1, p = 0.1, and p = 0.4, respectively). The groups receiving ropivacaine combined with dexmedetomidine and prilocaine had the lowest values of VAS during activity in POD2 (p < 0.01), while in POD3 the groups receiving ropivacaine combined with prilocaine and the bupivacaine one had the lowest values (p < 0.01). No significant difference was found in VAS during activity between any group in POD 0 (p = 0.4) and POD 1 (p = 0.3).

CONCLUSION

Ropivacaine combined with dexmedetomidine might be the best compound for continuous femoral nerve block to manage pain following TKA during the first PODs. Further high-quality investigations are necessary to validate these findings in clinical settings.

Survivorship in robotic total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the gold standard surgical management for end-stage knee osteoarthritis (OA). Robotic TKA (rTKA) was developed to improve bone preparation accuracy and increase reproducibility. In many settings internationally, rTKA systems have significantly higher costs for patients, and survivorship outcomes are unclear. There are several prior meta-analyses, but these focused on clinical and radiologic outcomes, and to our knowledge, none have evaluated survival. Differences in survival between semi-active or active robotic systems are also not well investigated.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

METHODS

A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted on comparative studies between robotic-assisted TKAs and conventional TKAs (cTKAs) in patients undergoing TKA for primary knee OA. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and SCOPUS from inception to 19 December 2024. Outcomes assessed were the implant survival in robotic-assisted TKA compared to conventional methods in standard primary knee OA cases, with subgrouping between active and semi-active systems performed. Secondary outcomes included associated complications, post-operative pain scores, and functional outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 20 comparative studies were included in the meta-analysis. Among them, 2,804 patients underwent cTKA, while 2,599 underwent rTKA. At two years, the pooled survivorship rate was 97.9% (95% CI: 96-99) in the conventional group and 98.3% (95% CI: 96.2-99.2) in the robotic group. There were no significant differences between the groups (P = 0.7). There were no significant differences between the robotic (semi-active) group and the conventional group (P = 0.5) on further unpaired T-Testing. Between 2 and 5 years, pooled survivorship rates in the conventional group were 96.8% (95% CI: 90.3-99) and 97.1% (95% CI: 91.3-99) in the robotic group. There were no significant differences between groups (P = 0.9). At ten years postoperatively, pooled survivorship rates in the conventional group were 96.9% (95% CI: 95-98) and 97.8% (95% CI: 96.7-98.5) in the robotic group. There were no significant differences between the groups (P = 0.3).

CONCLUSION

Conventional TKA is non-inferior to rTKA at short and long-term follow-up with regard to implant survival, complications, and postoperative pain scores, while rTKA shows subtle improvements in functional outcome measures.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

CRD42024540997.

Current trends of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA): choosing between robotic-assisted and conventional surgeries and timing of procedures

BACKGROUND

With robotic advancements in UKA technology, we sought to explore if robotic-assisted UKA could translate to clinical benefits such as reduced hospital stays and lowered emergency readmissions. Also, current utilization trends of UKA and choice of procedure timing (unilateral [uUKA] vs. one-staged bilateral UKA [biUKA]) could be explored.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study utilizing the Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System (CDARS) for data retrieval. All patients who had undergone primary UKA in all Hospital Authority (HA) hospitals in HK from 2021-2023 were included. Primary outcomes included utilization of UKA compared to TKA and percentage utilization of different UKA systems, namely, conventional, Mako, and Cori/Navio systems, from 2021-2023. Secondary outcomes involved: (1) patient demographics, (2) postoperative average length of stay (ALOS), (3) 30-day and 90-day postoperative Accident and Emergency Department (AED) attendance, (4) surgical times (skin-to-skin) and (5) 90-day mortality and reoperation. Differences in outcomes between uUKA and biUKA and between different robotic systems were examined. Regression analysis was performed to study if utilization of robotic-assisted systems could contribute to reduced hospital stays.

RESULTS

UKA accounted for 15.2% of primary knee arthroplasties throughout 2021-2023. Robotic-assisted UKA (Mako and Navio/Cori) has shown an increasing utilization since 2022 in both unilateral (16.0% to 25.9%) and bilateral operations (17.8% to 29.0%). Mako had shorter ALOS than Navio/Cori (2.9 ± 1.6 vs. 3.6 ± 2.6 days; P = 0.006) and significantly shorter ALOS than conventional UKA (2.9 ± 1.6 vs. 3.6 ± 2.6 days; P = 0.004). Utilization of Mako was predictive of shortened ALOS on multi-linear regression (β = - 0.056; P = 0.049). Interestingly, biUKAs, especially conventional ones, showed a lower attendance rate than uUKAs at 30-day (2.9% VS 6.9%; P = 0.036) and 90-days (7.8% VS 15.7%; P = 0.004). Robotic-assisted surgery was associated with a prolonged surgical time of 16.4 min in uUKA and 29.1 min in biUKA compared to conventional operations.

CONCLUSION

UKA utilization has dropped since 2021 but the percentage of robotic-assisted UKA has risen. Mako yielded promising results in reducing hospital stays compared to conventional operations. Sub-group analysis (Mako versus Cori/Navio) highlighted the importance of distinguishing between different robotic platforms. For patients with bilateral unicompartmental OA, biUKA was shown to be a safe and effective alternative to unilateral operations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered (HKU/ HA HKW IRB; Ref No: 24-373).

Changes in Sleep Quality After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a surgical procedure to improve the quality of life of patients with osteoarthritis. However, postoperative recovery can be difficult due to sleep disturbance, such as poor sleep quality, and postsurgical pain.

PURPOSE

The aim of this systematic review was to examine recent evidence regarding changes in sleep quality after TKA and to explore factors affecting the postoperative recovery process.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. We screened the PubMed, Google Scholar, ScopeMed, and Science Direct databases in December 2022 using the keywords sleep, total knee replacement surgery, knee arthroplasty, and sleep disruptions for relevant articles published between 2011 and 2022. Seven studies met all inclusion criteria and were included in the final sample for analysis.

RESULTS

Findings revealed that sleep disturbance was common during the early stages of the TKA recovery period and may be related to pain. After three months, sleep quality improved and pain intensity decreased. Three studies found a correlation between sleep and pain; however, another three studies did not.

CONCLUSION

Health professionals, including surgical nurses, should be aware of the potential impact of TKA on sleep quality and understand, assess, and manage sleep disturbance and pain to provide comprehensive care for their patients and enhance recovery.

A comparison of patients receiving vertebral body tethering for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in the public and private hospital setting

PURPOSE

Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a new growth-modulating surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) requiring a distinct skillset and intraoperative setup. We compared perioperative details and outcomes of VBTs performed in a public pediatric orthopedic hospital and a general private hospital setting.

METHODS

We identified all patients receiving VBT for AIS from 1/2020 to 12/2023 with ≥ 6 months post-operative follow-up, with surgeries performed by the same senior surgeons. Clinical, radiological, and surgical details were retrieved.

RESULTS

24 VBTs were performed in the private setting and 16 in the public setting. Average age at operation was 11.9 ± 1.1 at a Sanders staging of 3.8 ± 1.2 when the major curve Cobb angle was 50.5 ± 8.0°. Tethered curves were most often thoracic in location (23/40) followed by thoracolumbar/lumbar curves (10/40) and double curve tethers (7/40). Overall correction ratio of 68.0 ± 19.0% was achieved. Time from booking to operation (82.2 ± 39.2 vs 63.1 ± 34.4 days, p = 0.112) and operation time (310 ± 86.4 min vs. 289 ± 87.4 min, p = 0.054) were longer in the public and private setting respectively but failed to reach statistical significance. Time to chest drain removal (1.5 ± 0.8 vs. 3.5 ± 1.7 days, p < 0.001) and length of stay (4.3 ± 0.9 vs. 6.6 ± 1.8 days, p < 0.001) were significantly shorter in the private setting, whilst complication rates remained similar (7/24 vs. 3/16, p = 0.456).

CONCLUSION

Expertise, resource availability, and costs differ in the public and private healthcare setting. With regards to VBT, the conditions for referral and surgical outcomes remained similar. Earlier drain removal and discharge for patients managed in the private setting was not associated with an increase in complication rate.

Global mapping of institutional and hospital-based (Level II-IV) arthroplasty registries: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Four joint arthroplasty registries (JARs) levels exist based on the recorded data type. Level I JARs are national registries that record primary data. Hospital or institutional JARs (Level II-IV) document further data (patient-reported outcomes, demographic, radiographic). A worldwide list of Level II-IV JARs must be created to effectively assess and categorize these data.

METHODS

Our study is a systematic scoping review that followed the PRISMA guidelines and included 648 studies. Based on their publications, the study aimed to map the existing Level II-IV JARs worldwide. The secondary aim was to record their lifetime, publications' number and frequency and recognise differences with national JARs.

RESULTS

One hundred five Level II-IV JARs were identified. Forty-eight hospital-based, 45 institutional, and 12 regional JARs. Fifty JARs were found in America, 39 in Europe, nine in Asia, six in Oceania and one in Africa. They have published 485 cohorts, 91 case-series, 49 case-control, nine cross-sectional studies, eight registry protocols and six randomized trials. Most cohort studies were retrospective. Twenty-three per cent of papers studied patient-reported outcomes, 21.45% surgical complications, 13.73% postoperative clinical and 5.25% radiographic outcomes, and 11.88% were survival analyses. Forty-four JARs have published only one paper. Level I JARs primarily publish implant revision risk annual reports, while Level IV JARs collect comprehensive data to conduct retrospective cohort studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study mapping all Level II-IV JARs worldwide. Most JARs are found in Europe and America, reporting on retrospective cohorts, but only a few report on studies systematically.

The impact of waiting time for orthopaedic consultation on pain levels in individuals with osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Time spent waiting for access to orthopaedic specialist health services has been suggested to result in increased pain in individuals with osteoarthritis (OA). We assessed whether time spent on an orthopaedic waiting list resulted in a detrimental effect on pain levels in patients with knee or hip OA.

METHODS

We searched Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE and EBSCOhost databases from inception until September 2021. Eligible articles included individuals with OA on an orthopaedic waitlist and not receiving active treatment, and reported pain measures at two or more time points. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate the pooled effect of waiting time on pain levels. Meta-regression was used to determine predictors of effect size.

RESULTS

Thirty-three articles were included (n = 2,490 participants, 67 ± 3 years and 62% female). The range of waiting time was 2 weeks to 2 years (20.8 ± 18.8 weeks). There was no significant change in pain over time (effect size = 0.082, 95% CI = -0.009, 0.172), nor was the length of time associated with longitudinal changes in pain over time (β = 0.004, 95% CI = -0.005, 0.012). Body mass index was a significant predictor of pain (β = -0.043, 95% CI = -0.079, 0.006), whereas age and sex were not.

CONCLUSIONS

Pain remained stable for up to 1 year in patients with OA on an orthopaedic waitlist. Future research is required to understand whether pain increases in patients waiting longer than 1 year.

Significant deterioration in quality of life and increased frailty in patients waiting more than six months for total hip or knee arthroplasty

Aims

The primary aim of this study was to assess whether patients waiting six months or more for a total hip (THA) or knee (KA) arthroplasty had a deterioration in their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Secondary aims were to assess changes in frailty and the number of patients living in a state considered to be worse than death (WTD), and factors associated with changes in HRQoL and frailty.

Methods

This cross-sectional study included 326 patients, 150 males (46.0%) and 176 females (54.0%), with a mean age of 68.6 years (SD 9.8) who were randomly selected from waiting lists at four centres and had been waiting for six months or more (median 13 months, interquartile range 10 to 21) for a primary THA (n = 161) or KA (n = 165). The EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) and visual analogue scores (EQ-VAS), Rockwood Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), and 36-Item Short Form Survey subjective change in HRQoL were assessed at the time and recalled for six months earlier. A state that was WTD was defined as an EQ-5D of less than zero.

Results

There were significant deteriorations in the EQ-5D (mean 0.175, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.145 to 0.204; p < 0.001), EQ-VAS (mean 8.6, 95% CI 7.0 to 10.4; < 0.001), and CFS (from 3 “managing well” to 4 “vulnerable”; p < 0.001), and a significant increase in the number of those in a state that was WTD (n = 48; p < 0.001) during the previous six months for the whole cohort. A total of 110 patients (33.7%) stated that their health was much worse and 107 (32.8%) felt it was somewhat worse compared with six months previously. A significantly greater EQ-5D (-0.14, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.28; p = 0.038) and a state that was not WTD (-0.14, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.26; p = 0.031) were associated with a deterioration in the EQ-5D. THA (0.21, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.34; p = 0.002) or a lower (better) CFS (0.14, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.20; p < 0.001) were independently significantly associated with a deterioration in the CFS.

Conclusion

Patients waiting more than six months for THA or KA had a significant deterioration in their HRQoL and increased frailty, with two-thirds of patients feeling that their health had worsened. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(11):1215–1224.

Impact of the Harm Review Service for Patients Awaiting Elective Hip and Knee Surgeries for More Than 52 Weeks

Background

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected medical practice worldwide. In the UK, elective operative lists had to be postponed to accommodate the increase in hospital admissions. Within our local trauma and orthopaedic department, a harm review clinic was developed for these postponed elective cases. The purpose of this clinic was to evaluate the impact and outcomes of the delay in elective hip and knee procedures.

Methodology

The elective list database of William Harvey Hospital, Kent, from April to December 2020 was retrospectively analysed. Inclusion criteria included all lower limb primary arthroplasty, elective lower limb revision surgery, and other hip and knee procedure patients waiting more than 52 weeks for surgery. All patients had telephone consultations averaging 10 minutes. Data included patients’ symptoms, fresh investigations, changes in treatment plans, mental health status, and value of consultation were assessed and recorded.

Results

A total of 242 patients from eight lower limb consultants were analysed. Patients with hip pathology accounted for 39.2% (95 patients) versus knee pathology accounting for 60.7% (147 patients). In total, 13 (5.37%) patients reported improvement in their physical symptoms, whereas 46 (19%) felt their symptoms worsen. Overall, 26 (10.7%) patients had a change in their treatment plan following the consultation. In total, 18 (7.4%) patients required further face-to-face follow-up following the telephone consultation There were no patients who had significant physical or mental harm.

Conclusions

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought changes in how we practice medicine. The harm review service has been a valuable service to both patients and the orthopaedic department. This harms review clinic was able to identify changes in treatment plans for patients. A small percentage of patients required face-to-face appointments. We suggest telephone assessment should be the first mode of communication with patients. Further studies should be conducted in other specialities to determine if there are similar outcomes.

The Impact of Harm Review Service on Patients Awaiting Elective Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Surgery for More Than 52 Weeks

Background and objective

There has been a significant increase in waiting times for elective surgical procedures in orthopaedic surgery as a result of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. As per the hospital policy, patients awaiting elective surgery for more than 52 weeks were offered a consultant-led harm review. The aim of this study was to objectively assess the impact of this service on the field of foot and ankle surgery.

Materials and methods

The data from harm review clinics at a District General Hospital related to patients waiting to undergo elective foot and ankle procedures in the year 2021 (wait time of more than 52 weeks) were assessed. Clinical data points like change in diagnosis, need for further investigations, and patients being taken off the waiting list were reviewed. The effect of the waiting time on patients’ mental health and their perception of the service was assessed as well.

Results

A total of 72 patients awaiting foot and ankle procedures for more than 52 weeks were assessed as a part of the harm review service. It was noted that 25% of patients found that their symptoms had worsened while 66.1% perceived them to be unchanged. Twelve patients (16.9%) were sent for updated investigations. Twenty-one patients (29.5%) were taken off the waiting lists for various reasons with the most common one being other pressing health concerns; 9% of patients affirmed that the wait for surgery had a significant negative impact on their mental health.

Conclusion

This study concludes that the harm review service is a useful programme as it helps guide changes in the diagnosis and clinical picture. The service is found to be valuable by most patients, and its impact on the service specialities and multiple centres could be further assessed to draw broad conclusions.

French-language adaptation of the 16D and 17D Quality of Life measures and score description in two Canadian pediatric samples

PURPOSE

The Health state descriptive system includes standardized self-administered instruments for measuring Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) respectively among adolescents, and children. The objectives of the current study were: (1) to translate and adapt the pediatric-adolescent version 16D and 17D from English into French (Canada), (2) to demonstrate their feasibility in pediatric conditions.

METHODS

The translation methodology combined forward and back translations, and cognitive debriefing with eight adolescents and eight children. Four bilingual translators were involved in the process. We administered the translated versions to two clinical samples, being treated for Primary immunodeficiency (PID, n = 48, aged 14.1 years, 20 girls), and having recovered from pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL, n = 153, aged 14.7 years, 77 girls).

RESULTS

Cognitive debriefing indicated that that the instructions, items, and response options were clear, easy to understand, and easy to answer. Adjustments were made for clarity. Translated versions were highly usable (measurement completion >90%). HRQoL levels were high for both samples (range 0.85-0.96). Participants reported lower levels if they were adolescents, particularly if they were girls. Older boys with PID reported a lower HRQoL than their counterparts with a history of ALL. PID and ALL patients mainly reported issues with discomfort and pain, concentration/learning, physical appearance, and psychological distress and sleeping, although to a different degree.

CONCLUSION

The French-language versions of the 16D and 17D are easy to administer and may be used to identify problematic domains. Greater availability of translated versions of short evaluation tools may facilitate broader uptake of screening practices in pediatric care.

A randomized controlled trial on the effect of focal thermal therapy at acupressure points treating osteoarthritis of the knee

Background

Osteoarthritis of the knee is a common degenerative joint disorder in our ageing population. A combination of thermal therapy with a self-management exercise have shown a positive effect in the management of osteoarthritis of the knee. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of topical heat pack versus focal application of heat therapy at the acupressure points in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee.

Methods

A randomized controlled trial was conducted in 76 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee, diagnosed by an experienced orthopedic surgeon. Following inclusion and exclusion selection, patients were randomly allocated to group 1 (Heat pack) or group 2 (Thermal gun). All patients received 30 min of treatment in each session, twice a week for 4 weeks. They also received an education program and taught home knee exercises. Outcome measurements were the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain intensity, muscle power, knee ROM, WOMAC and SF-12v2.

Results

In the Thermal gun group, function and total scores (WOMAC) and Physical Composite Scale (SF-12v2) were significantly improved after 8 sessions. Quadriceps strength was significantly improved after 8 weeks (from 4.42 to 4.63; p = 0.02). In the Heat pack group, flexion was significantly improved after 8 sessions (p = 0.02). Mean VAS scores after Heat pack treatment was consistently better (lower) than mean VAS scores after Thermal gun treatment.

Conclusion

The combination of focal thermal therapy at acupressure points is a viable conservative treatment in osteoarthritis of the knee. The pressure at the acupressure points has a synergistic benefit than topical thermal therapy alone.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04735029

Date of registration: February 2, 2021 (Retrospectively registered)

Progression of health-related quality of life of patients waiting for total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains the surgical gold standard treatment for patients suffering from end-stage osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. However, due to the high demand and scarce medical resources, the waiting time for surgery is astoundingly lengthy. Controversies are shown in numerous studies, on whether physical functionality and mental status decline or remain stable over the waiting period. This study aims to evaluate the progression in patients suffering from end-stage OA while on the waiting list for TKA.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty-seven patients suffering from end-stage OA who were on the TKA waiting list were prospectively recruited from our orthopaedics specialist clinic. They were assessed once a year for 2 years or until surgery. The Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), SF-36 self-rated questionnaire and 15D health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire were used as outcome measurements for functionality and disability assessment.

RESULTS

Patients on the waiting list for TKA showed a progressive increase in pain and disability level within the first year (P = .035). Those patients waiting for more than 2 years showed worsening HRQoL (P < .05) as time progressed. However, no significant difference was observed between the first and second years.

CONCLUSIONS

A decline in functionality and increase in disability were shown in follow-up assessments conducted every year. However, a plateau effect is observed with end-stage disease. This emphasizes that more active conservative management programmes should be introduced and implemented while patients are enlisted on the TKA waiting list. Moreover, timely surgical intervention can improve patients' overall function.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study involved human participants and reports health-related outcomes concerning the HRQoL in patients with end-stage OA of the knee. Thus, it was registered, retrospectively, as a clinical trial under the U.S. National Library of Medicine ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov/) on March 4, 2018.

Quantifying the Backlog of Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Cases: Predicting the Impact of COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are two high-volume procedures that were delayed due to COVID-19.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

To help strategize an effective return to elective orthopedic surgery, we aimed to quantify the volume of THA and TKA cases delayed across the USA and estimate the time required to care for these patients when non-urgent surgery resumes.

METHODS

Population-level data was used to estimate monthly THA and TKA procedural volume from 2011 to 2017. Using linear regression, we used this data to project monthly procedural volumes for 2020 to 2023. Nine different permutations were modeled to account for variations in case delay rates (50%, 75%, 100%) and in resumption of non-urgent procedure timing. Two recovery pathways using the highest volume month as a surrogate for maximum operative capacity, and a second using the highest month + 20% were used to simulate a theoretical expansion of current capacity.

RESULTS

The projected national volume of delayed cases was 155,293 (mid-March through April; 95% CI 142,004 to 168,580), 260,806 (through May; 95% CI 238,658 to 282,952), and 372,706 (through June; 95% CI 341,699 to 403,709). The best- and worst-case scenarios for delayed cases were 77,646 (95% CI 71,002 to 84,290) and 372,706 (95% CI 341,699 to 403,709), respectively. The projected catch-up time varied between 9 and nearly 35 months for the best- and worst-case scenarios. The addition of 20% increased productivity decreased this time to between 3.21 and 11.59 months.

CONCLUSION

The COVID-19 pandemic has generated a significant backlog of THA and TKA procedures. Surgeons, administrators, and policymakers should account for these modeled estimates of case volume delays and projected demands.

Patient Perceptions of COVID-19-Related Surgical Delay: An Analysis of Patients Awaiting Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 has caused unprecedented delays in elective orthopedic surgery. Understanding patients' perceptions of the disruptions in care and their willingness to reengage the healthcare system are crucial to planning the resumption of elective care.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purpose of this study was to elicit patient perceptions about delays in total joint arthroplasty during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

We identified a consecutive series of patients who experienced COVID-19-driven delays to scheduled total hip or knee arthroplasty at an urban, academic medical center in the Southeastern United States. A 20-item survey was administered via telephone. Answers were recorded and descriptive statistics were performed. A post hoc χ-square analysis compared characteristics and outlooks of patients who did and did not immediately desire surgery.

RESULTS

Of 111 patients (64% of those identified) who met inclusion criteria and completed the survey, 96% said they felt that they were treated fairly and 90% said that the surgical delay was in their best interest; 68% reported emotional distress from the delay, but 45% reported a desire to wait longer for the pandemic to subside. Lower joint-function scores, higher pain levels, higher pain catastrophizing scores, and longer latency from personally deciding to pursue surgery were associated with the reported need for immediate surgery.

CONCLUSION

Overall, patients reported that they understood the need for elective surgical delays during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the psychological implications they reported were not negligible. Patient preference for immediate reengagement with the healthcare system was dichotomous, with many patients favoring precautionarily furthering the delay. Understanding these preferences will help optimize elective orthopedic care during unprecedented times.