Potential oral health effects of e‐cigarettes and vaping: A review and case reports

Effects of Electronic Cigarettes on Periodontal Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

The use of electronic cigarettes "e-cigarettes," or vaping is growing in popularity, especially among adolescents and young adults. While the effects of cigarette smoking on oral health are well-established, the exact impact that e-cigarettes may have on dental tissues is still uncertain. The aim of the current review was to summarize evidence related to the effect of vaping on the periodontal health status of e-cigarette users.

METHODS

A comprehensive electronic search was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases, until January 31st, 2024. Two independent reviewers participated in the screening of studies, data extraction, and assessment of the included studies. Any disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer the quality assessment was done using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to assess the risk of bias. A frequentist meta-analysis was performed using R Statistical Software. The random effects model was adopted. Data were described as mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). A p-value of ≤ .05 was deemed statistically significant.

RESULTS

Ten studies met the eligibility criteria. Overall, the findings were consistent, with most studies showing that e-cigarette users are at greater risk of periodontal disease than nonsmokers, but that they have a lower risk than cigarette smokers. Pooling results showed lower mean probing depth (PD) among nonsmokers than e-smokers (MD: -1.91; 95% CI: [-3.36: -0.47]; p-value = .01) while it was higher among cigarette smokers in participants with periodontitis (MD:0.43; 95%CI: [0.08:0.79]; p-value = .02). Compared to e-smoking, nonsmokers had lower PI (MD: -20.63; 95%CI: [-28.04: -13.21]; p-value < .001) while cigarette smokers had higher PI (MD: 4.88; 95% CI: [-1.52:11.29]; p-value = .135). Among participants with periodontitis, only cigarette smokers had significantly higher PI (MD: 4.53; 95%CI: [1.94:7.13]; p-value < .001).

CONCLUSION

Based on the current analysis, conventional cigarette smoking is the most detrimental to periodontal health among the groups compared in all included studies. This indicates that traditional cigarettes have a more severe impact on periodontal tissues than do e-cigarettes. The data suggest a gradient of risk where nonsmokers have the lowest risk, e-cigarette users have a moderate risk, and cigarette smokers have the highest risk for periodontal health issues.

Toxic cultures: e-cigarettes and the oral microbial exposome

We tested the hypothesis that e-cigarette aerosol is metabolized by the indigenous oral microbiome, leading to structural and functional alterations. We combined untargeted metabolomics of in vitro commensal-rich and pathogen-rich biofilms with metatranscriptomics and fluorescent microscopy and verified the results in human samples. Spectral deconvolution of 4215 peaks identified 969 exposomal and endogenous metabolites that mapped to 23 metabolic pathways. The metabolites clustered by both aerosol characteristics and biofilm composition; and several were verified in human saliva of vapers. E-cigarette exposure upregulated xenobiotic degradation, capsule, peptidoglycan biosynthesis, organic carbon-compound metabolism, antimicrobial resistance, and secretion systems. E-cigarette exposure also altered biofilm architecture characterized by low surface-area to biovolume ratio, high biomass, and diffusion distance. In conclusion, our data suggest that bacterial metabolism of e-cigarette aerosol triggers a quorum-sensing-regulated stress response which mediates the formation of dense, exopolysaccharide-rich biofilms in health-compatible communities and antibiotic resistance and virulence amplification in disease-associated communities.

A novel online vaping intervention and smoking prevention program for young adults who vape: protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

E-cigarette use (i.e., vaping) is prevalent among young adults in the U.S. Studies show that young adults who vape are more likely to initiate cigarette smoking than young adults who do not vape. Despite this, little research on vaping interventions and prevention of smoking for young adults who vape exist.

METHODS

A 2-arm pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted by recruiting young adults ages 18-24 who reported vaping at least once per week in the past 30 days and having never smoked cigarettes at baseline. Participants will be recruited via social media ads and be randomly assigned to an intervention arm, which will be the Live Free From E-cigarettes (LIFFE) mobile-based program (n = 50), or a waitlist control arm (n = 50). The primary outcomes are biochemically verified 7-day point prevalence abstinence for nicotine vaping, vaping reduction, and smoking susceptibility. Outcomes are measured at 2-, 4-, and 8-weeks after randomization.

DISCUSSION

This is the first RCT to evaluate the effectiveness of a mobile-based intervention that targets smoking susceptibility while also supporting vaping cessation or vaping reduction in young adults. Findings may inform future efforts to prevent transition to cigarette smoking and vaping cessation and reduction in young adults.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06129123; Date of registration: 11/10/2023.

Relationship between e-cigarette media content and product use: A scoping review

INTRODUCTION

E-cigarettes have emerged as a popular alternative to traditional tobacco products, raising concerns about the potential public health impact of widespread exposure to e-cigarette content. This scoping review aimed to answer the question: 'Is there an association between exposure to e-cigarette content on social or traditional media and product use among individuals?'.

METHODS

The review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A literature search was performed in MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane, EMBASE, and ScienceDirect on 30 July 2023, including studies published from 2004 to July 2023. Only studies in English were included, focusing on participants exposure to e-cigarettes via media platforms. The review examined self-reported exposure to organic posts and promotions, with outcomes related to e-cigarette use (lifetime/ever and current/past 30-day use). The review also explored trends in media advertising and e-cigarette use during that period. The marketing platforms assessed included social media (Instagram, YouTube, Reddit, Facebook, Twitter, and Snapchat, websites), traditional media (television, movies, radio), and print media (magazines, newspapers).

RESULTS

Of the 30 studies included in this review, 14 were longitudinal in design. The majority were conducted in the United States (n=27), with one study each from China, Germany, and Scotland. The prevalence of current and ever e-cigarette users varied across different regions and populations. The majority of studies covered in the review observed a significant association between e-cigarette marketing exposure and product use among various demographic groups. Multiple US national studies reported an upward trend in e-cigarettes use from 2011 to 2019. Longitudinal studies indicated a temporal relationship between e-cigarette marketing and subsequent product use, particularly among youth.

CONCLUSIONS

This scoping review highlights the evolving landscape of e-cigarette media advertising and its potential correlation on product use. Exposure to e-cigarette content on traditional and social media was consistently associated with e-cigarette consumption among diverse populations.

Behavioral intention to use electronic cigarettes in the Philippines: The role of social influence, knowledge, price and health impact

Electronic cigarettes or e-cigarettes have gained significant popularity as an alternative to traditional cigarettes, yet limited research has examined the factors influencing their adoption, particularly in developing nations like the Philippines, where usage is rising. This study investigates the behavioral drivers of e-cigarette use, with a particular focus on the role of knowledge, alongside social influence, perceived price impact, perceived health impact, and perceived usefulness. Using purposive sampling, 310 valid responses were collected from current e-cigarette users, traditional cigarette users, or individuals with prior experience with these products. A structured questionnaire with 21 indicators was administered, and data were analyzed using Partial Least Square-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The findings reveal that knowledge is the strongest predictor of behavioral intention, highlighting the critical role of informed awareness about the risks and impacts of e-cigarettes in shaping user decisions. Social influence, perceived price impact, and perceived health impact also significantly influence behavioral intention, demonstrating the interconnectedness of cognitive, social, and economic factors. Interestingly, perceived usefulness did not have a significant effect, challenging assumptions about the importance of functional benefits in driving e-cigarette adoption. These results underscore the importance of education and awareness campaigns in addressing misconceptions about e-cigarettes. Policymakers, regulators, and health professionals should prioritize knowledge-driven interventions to empower individuals to make informed decisions and mitigate e-cigarette use, particularly among younger and economically vulnerable populations.

Evaluation and Comparison of Capillary Morphology Among Combusted Tobacco, Heated Tobacco and E-Cigarette Users

The habit of smoking in its various forms represents a significant public health concern due to its wide range of pathological effects, included the oral cavity. In recent years, alternatives to traditional cigarettes, such as heated tobacco products and electronic cigarettes, have gained popularity and are often marketed as potentially less harmful options. This study seeks to evaluate and compare the morphometric characteristics of oral mucosal capillaries in individuals who consume combusted tobacco, heated tobacco, vaporized liquid, and non-smokers. Using videocapillaroscopy, we assessed both parametric and non-parametric data from 60 patients, divided into four groups according to their smoking habits. The analysis revealed significant differences in capillary morphology among the groups. Users of combusted tobacco exhibited pronounced reductions in capillary diameter, alongside increased tortuosity and the presence of microaneurysms. These alterations are indicative of chronic inflammation and vasoconstriction, likely driven by exposure to nicotine and the high temperatures associated with combustion. Conversely, users of heated tobacco and vaporized liquid exhibited comparatively fewer vascular abnormalities, although angiogenic effects attributable to nicotine were still observable. These findings suggest that alternative tobacco products may have a comparatively lesser impact on the oral microcirculation when compared to traditional smoking. However, the potential long-term effects of these products remain unclear. Further longitudinal research is required to fully understand the risks associated with prolonged use of heated tobacco and electronic cigarettes.

Oral health risks in adults who use electronic nicotine delivery systems and oral nicotine pouches: a critical review of the literature and qualitative synthesis of the available evidence

BACKGROUND

Use of combustible cigarettes (CCs) and smokeless oral tobacco products are well documented risk factors for a variety of oral diseases. However, the potential oral health risks of using recently introduced (since about 2000) non-combustible tobacco/nicotine products (NCPs: electronic cigarettes (ECs), heated tobacco products (HTPs) and oral nicotine pouches (ONPs), remain poorly established.

METHODS

This review evaluates published human studies on detrimental oral health effects in people who use NCPs compared to those smoking cigarettes and those not using any tobacco/nicotine product (NU). We identified 52 studies, predominantly focusing on adults who used electronic cigarettes as an NCP. The studies exhibited significant heterogeneity regarding design, populations, endpoints and quality. Reported outcomes, based on both single and grouped endpoints were qualitatively evaluated by comparing people who use NCPs with NU and with people smoking CCs. Significant increases (indicating a worsening in oral health), significant decreases (indicating a lower level of detrimental effects) and no significant difference between groups were assigned scores of + 1, -1 and 0, respectively. Scores from studies belonging to the same single or grouped endpoints were averaged to a summary score ranging from - 1 to + 1.

RESULTS

The qualitative meta-analysis revealed that comparisons of EC versus NU groups yielded mean scores of 0.29 for pre-cancerous lesions (N = 14 observations), 0.27 for inflammatory processes (N = 83), 0.43 for oral clinical parameters (N = 93) and 0.70 for shifts in the oral microbiome (N = 10). The corresponding values for the EC versus CC group comparisons amounted to -0.33 (N = 15), -0.14 (N = 76), -0.27 (N = 78) and 0.57 (N = 7). Most studies had significant limitations regarding group sizes, duration of NCP use (mostly only a few years) and validity of self-reported exclusive NCP use. Notably, the implications of dual use (EC + CC) and prior CC use were often not adequately considered.

CONCLUSIONS

The evaluated studies suggest that use of ECs is associated with relatively fewer detrimental oral health effects compared to smoking, yet oral health status remains poorer compared to not using any tobacco/nicotine products. These results have to be interpreted with caution due to a number of limitations and uncertainties in the underlying studies, particularly the potential biases and confounding factors inherent in cross-sectional study designs.

The Impact of E-Cigarettes on Oral Health-A Narrative Review

Background/Objectives: Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are commonly used by former smokers as an alternative product to conventional cigarettes and also by young adults and adolescents to deliver nicotine. E-cigarettes are thought to be a less harmful and more socially acceptable alternative to tobacco smoking; however, their long-term effects on health, including oral health, are currently unknown. Methods: A literature search for relevant papers indexed in the literature from 2016 to 2023 was conducted using the PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. In our paper, we included clinical trials and both in vivo and in vitro research concerning the impact of e-cigarettes on oral health. Results: E-cigarettes impact the oral cavity, which is directly exposed to inhaled chemicals present in e-cigarette aerosols. The use of e-cigarettes has been linked to teeth discoloration and dental caries, promoting the development of periodontal diseases and causing oral mucosa lesions, including oral cancer. E-cigarette aerosols might also negatively affect the oral microbiome by suppressing the growth of commensal bacteria and increasing the population of bacteria responsible for developing numerous oral disorders. E-cigarettes also impact saliva composition and its properties, including reducing saliva's antibacterial and antioxidant properties, which may subsequently lead to the promotion of oral diseases. Conclusions: The outcomes suggest that e-cigarette usage may cause the development of oral diseases, however further longitudinal studies of a larger and homogenous group of e-cigarette users are required.

In vitro toxicity and chemical analysis of e-cigarette aerosol produced amid dry hitting

Dry hitting, a phenomenon produced by e-cigarettes with refillable cartridges when the liquid in the coil is low, is a common occurrence among regular vapers despite being an unintended consequence of the device. This phenomenon's hazard to public health is still unknown and needs further investigation. Lung cells cultured at the air-liquid interface were exposed to vaped aerosol consisting of 3 % w/v ethyl maltol in propylene glycol for three-second puffs every 30 seconds for 80 total puffs with either dry hit or saturated conditions. Cytotoxicity was measured colorimetrically. The thermal degradation of the heating coils and wicks was visualized using scanning electron microscopy. The chemical byproducts in the aerosol were analyzed using proton nuclear magnetic resonance and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. The results revealed a highly significant increase in cytotoxicity from dry hit treatments. Imaging showed thermal decomposition of the cotton wick after dry hitting, which was confirmed by energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy with less oxygen in the dry hit cotton. Chemical byproducts were found via unique peaks in the dry hit condensate in the aromatic and alkene regions. Saturated condensate showed higher concentrations of detected metal species than dry-hit condensate. E-cigarette users should avoid dry hitting by refilling tanks or cartridges preemptively or by using disposable coils to avoid increased toxicity during vaping.

A Systematic Literature Review on the Composition, Health Impacts, and Regulatory Dynamics of Vaping

This comprehensive review deals with the multifaceted aspects of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes), examining their composition, health implications, regulatory challenges, and market dynamics. E-cigarettes, also known as vaping devices, function by warming a solution of liquid containing flavors, nicotine, and various other compounds to produce an aerosol for users to inhale. This review underscores the evolution and widespread adoption of e-cigarettes since their introduction in 2003, highlighting their appeal as alternatives to traditional tobacco smoking. The essential parts of e-cigarettes are the battery, heating element, e-liquid (or e-juice), and mouthpiece. Propylene glycol and vegetable glycerin are common ingredients in e-liquids, along with nicotine and other flavors. Concerns over the health impacts of e-cigarettes have grown, particularly in light of incidents like the e-cigarette or vaping-associated lung injury outbreak in 2019 linked to vaping-associated lung injuries. Evidence suggests that while e-cigarettes may pose fewer risks than conventional cigarettes, they are not without health consequences, including potential respiratory and cardiovascular effects. Regulatory efforts worldwide have struggled to keep pace with the rapid evolution of e-cigarettes, exacerbated by their diverse flavors and marketing strategies that appeal to youth. The review discusses global regulatory responses, including bans and restrictions, to curb youth uptake and address public health concerns. Furthermore, the rise of a black market for e-cigarettes poses additional challenges to effective regulation and tobacco control efforts. In conclusion, while e-cigarettes offer potential harm reduction benefits for adult smokers seeking alternatives to traditional tobacco products, their widespread availability and evolving landscape necessitate vigilant regulatory oversight to protect public health, especially among youth. Future research should continue to explore the long-term health impacts and efficacy of e-cigarettes as smoking elimination aids, informing evidence-based policies and interventions.

Oral symptoms potentially associated with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 in tobacco users

INTRODUCTION

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a worldwide infection characterized by various symptoms. Few studies have examined its oral manifestations. However, there is insufficient information on the oral manifestations of patients with COVID-19 who use tobacco products. Therefore, this cross-sectional study investigated oral symptoms of tobacco-using patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19.

METHODS

This study used a convenience sample of non-hospitalized patients (aged ≥18 years) with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 diagnosed by polymerized chain reaction (PCR). This study excluded pregnant or lactating women or patients with serious COVID-19 complications, including those who required hospitalization or were on specific medications (antiviral, corticosteroid, antimicrobial, or immunosuppressive). Oral examinations were performed, including labial, buccal, and gingival mucosa, tongue, floor of the mouth, and palate, for any newly developed lesions associated with the onset of COVID-19. The salivary flow was determined using the passive drool collection technique.

RESULTS

Lip dryness, gingivitis, tongue lesions, and taste loss were the most commonly reported oral symptoms in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. The most common general symptoms were tiredness and headache (63.9%), followed by dry cough, myalgia, sore throat, and fever. This study found 139 occurrences of oral symptoms, of which 52 were dry lips (27 tobacco non-users, and 25 tobacco users), and 11 were gingivitis (five non-users, and six tobacco users), and 12 tongue changes (eight non-users, and four tobacco users). Ageusia, or loss of taste sensation, was most commonly reported with or without other oral COVID-19 symptoms (55 occurrences: 36 non-users and 19 tobacco users). No significant differences were found in oral symptoms between tobacco non-users and tobacco users.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need to expand the routine examination protocol for patients during future respiratory pandemics, as monitoring oral health allows dentists to improve the management of oral sequelae during a pandemic.

Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS): a strategy for smoking cessation or a new risk factor for oral health?

DATA SOURCES

A search was conducted in PubMed and Cochrane Library databases for articles published in English between January 2012 and October 2022.

STUDY SELECTION

Articles were selected using both the term "electronic nicotine delivery system" (ENDS), as per the Medical Subject Heading (MeSH), in conjunction with specific oral domains. In vitro studies, animal models, unregistered clinical trials, and articles with conflicts of interest were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Clinical and public health studies comparing ENDS users, smokers, and non-smokers in the context of oral-related diseases were included. Results from duplicate articles were not considered.

RESULTS

The study indicates a potential carcinogenic effect due to cytogenotoxicity from intrinsic components of ENDS. However, this does not establish ENDS as an independent risk factor for oral cancer. ENDS use may alter the oral microbiome, leading to increased biofilm adhesion and potential associations with caries, periodontal disease, and peri-implantitis. The wide variety of flavors available in the ENDS market is a significant factor influencing initiation and long-term use by young people.

CONCLUSIONS

ENDS users are susceptible to periodontal disease, caries, soft tissue injuries, and changes in tooth and prosthesis coloration. The chemical components in ENDS can induce cellular changes associated with a potential risk of oral cancer. However, more long-term studies are required to fully understand the impact of ENDS use on oral health.

Healthcare utilisation and expenditures attributable to current e-cigarette use among US adults

AIMS

This study estimated annual healthcare expenditures attributable to current e-cigarette use among US adults, including current exclusive and dual/poly e-cigarette use.

METHODS

Analysing the 2015-2018 National Health Interview Survey data, we estimated the impacts of e-cigarette use on healthcare utilisation among adults aged 18+ years. Healthcare utilisation outcomes were hospital nights, emergency room (ER) visits, doctor visits and home visits. Current e-cigarette use was categorised as exclusive and dual/poly e-cigarette use. The econometric model included two equations: health status as a function of e-cigarette use and other independent variables, and healthcare utilisation as a function of health status, e-cigarette use, and other independent variables. Using an 'excess utilisation' approach, we multiplied the e-cigarette-attributable fraction derived from the model by annual health expenditures to calculate healthcare expenditures attributable to current exclusive and dual/poly e-cigarette use, the sum of which were expenditures attributable to all current e-cigarette use.

RESULTS

Current exclusive and dual/poly e-cigarette use, with 0.2% and 3.5% prevalence in 2015-2018, were associated with higher odds of reporting poor health status than never tobacco users. Poor health status was associated with higher odds of using the four healthcare services and a greater number of ER and doctor visits. Annual healthcare expenditures attributable to all current e-cigarette use was $15.1 billion ($2024 per user) in 2018, including $1.3 billion attributable to exclusive e-cigarette use ($1796 per user) and $13.8 billion attributable to dual/poly e-cigarette use ($2050 per user).

CONCLUSION

Adult current e-cigarette use was associated with substantial excess healthcare utilisation and expenditures.

Electronic Nicotine Delivery System: End to Smoking or Just a New Fancy Cigarette

Smoking and tobacco chewing are the predominant causes of oral cancer. Tobacco is the second-most widely consumed psychoactive substance. There are numerous ways to quit smoking, of which one is electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes). E-cigarette use is a brand-new, global trend. E-cigarette is a battery-operated device that heats a liquid to create a vapor that the consumer inhales. Several countries have acknowledged that the first step toward electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) management is a precise classification of ENDS within the limits of current legislation. Countries have currently categorized ENDS into four generations. People's perceptions about tobacco products have altered recently as a consequence of the advertising of ENDS. The likelihood of starting to smoke cigarettes was four times higher in adolescents who used ENDS, and the probability of quitting was reduced and often prolonged in those who used ENDS. In addition, ENDS normalizes smoking-like actions including inhaling in and exhaling smoke. Adverse marketing via geographic locations and social media platforms, as well as nicotine's irreversible effects on growing adolescent and young adult brains that predispose individuals to addicted behaviors, may be responsible for their rising appeal among teenagers. Despite this, ENDS use has risen among young individuals who have never smoked and undoubtedly face more health risks than those who do not use ENDS. The oral cavity is the first to encounter ENDS in individuals and where it initially affects the human system. As a known contributor to cardiovascular diseases, neurological conditions, and cancers, nicotine seems to be a serious cause for concern. This review provides a concise summary of the research on the components, mode of action, applications, and effects of e-cigarettes on oral as well as systemic systems.

E-liquid exposure induces bladder cancer cells to release extracellular vesicles that promote non-malignant urothelial cell transformation

The vaping of electronic cigarettes (E-cigarettes) has recently emerged as a popular alternative to traditional cigarette smoking, but its association with bladder cancer (BC) risk remains to be established. BC patients exhibit high rates of recurrent disease, possibly as a consequence of the field cancerization effect. We have shown that BC-derived extracellular vesicles (BCEVs) can permanently alter recipient urothelial cells in predisposed fields such that they become fully transformed malignant cells. To model the role that BCEVs may play in this potentially oncogenic setting, we treated TCCSUP BC cells with cigarette smoke extract, unflavored E-liquid, or menthol flavored E-liquid. Those treated BCEVs were then tested for their tumorigenic potential. We found that these smoking- and E-cigarette-related BCEVs were able to promote oxidative stress, inflammatory signaling, and DNA damage in recipient SV-HUC urothelial cells. Strikingly, menthol E-liquid-induced BCEVs significantly increased rates of malignant urothelial cell transformation. While further in vivo validation of the simultaneous effects of E-liquid and E-liquid-induced BCEVs on field cancerization is needed, these data highlight the possibility that E-cigarettes may compound user risk in a manner that can contribute to higher rates of BC incidence or recurrence.

A comparison of the caries risk between patients who use vapes or electronic cigarettes and those who do not: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Evidence on the potential oral health effects of vaping is scarce and there are limited data on possible links to both caries and periodontal disease. The authors assessed the association between electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) or vape use and caries risk level. The Caries Management by Risk Assessment tool was used.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study of patient records was conducted; 13,098 patients who attended the dental school clinics from January 1, 2019, through January 1, 2022, were included in the study. Mann-Whitney U test and multivariable ordinal logistic regression were used to assess the relationship between use of e-cigarettes or vapes and caries risk level.

RESULTS

Data from 13,216 patients were included in the data set initially; 13,080 responded "no" when asked whether they used e-cigarettes or vapes (99.3%), and 136 responded "yes" (0.69%). There was a statistically significant difference (P < .001) in caries risk levels between the e-cigarette or vape group and the control group; 14.5%, 25.9%, and 59.6% of the control group were in the low, moderate, and high caries risk categories, respectively, and 6.6%, 14.3%, and 79.1% of the e-cigarette or vape group were in the low, moderate, and high caries risk categories, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study population, there was an association between use of e-cigarettes or vapes and caries risk level of patients; vaping patients had a higher risk of developing caries.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Within the study limitations, it was recommended that use of e-cigarettes or vapes should not only be included in the routine dental-medical history questionnaire, but also among the risk factors that increase a patient's caries risk level.

Impact of glycol-based solvents on indoor air quality-Artificial fog and exposure pathways of formaldehyde and various carbonyls

Artificial fog is commonly employed in the entertainment industry and indoor household celebrations. The fog is generated from glycol-based solvents, which can also be found in e-cigarettes and personal care products. Although potential health impacts of glycol inhalation are frequently cited by studies of e-cigarette smoking, the dynamics and the chemical composition of glycol-based aerosols have never been studied systematically. The objective of this work is to investigate the impact of glycol-based aerosol on indoor air quality. Specifically, we targeted artificial fogs generated with common glycols, including propylene glycol (PG) and triethylene glycol (TEG). With the aid of a novel aerosol collecting and monitoring instrument setup, we obtained time-resolved aerosol profiles and their chemical compositions in an experimental room. Artificial fog has given rise to a significant amount of ultra-fine particulate matter, demonstrating its negative impact on indoor air quality. Additionally, we found a high concentration (9.75 mM) of formaldehyde and other carbonyls in fog machine fluids stored for months. These compounds are introduced to the indoor air upon artificial fog application. We propose that carbonyls have accumulated from the oxidative decomposition of glycols, initiated by OH radicals and singlet oxygens (¹ O₂ ) and likely sustained by autooxidation. Oxidation of glycols by indoor oxidants has never been reported previously. Such chemical processes can represent an unrecognized source of toxic carbonyl compounds which is also applicable to other glycol-based solvents.

Periodontal and Peri-Implant Health Status in Traditional vs. Heat-Not-Burn Tobacco and Electronic Cigarettes Smokers: A Systematic Review

The aim of the present systematic review was to evaluate and possibly differentiate the effects of traditional cigarettes, heat-not-burn tobacco, and electronic cigarettes on periodontal and peri-implant health status. Electronic cigarettes and heat-not-burn tobacco have become very popular in recent years and have been proposed to consumers as a safer alternative to conventional tobacco smoke, although their effect on periodontal and peri-implant health remains unclear. The study protocol was developed according to PRISMA guidelines, and the focus question was formulated according to the PICO strategy. A literature search was conducted across PubMed/MEDLINE and the COCHRANE library from 2003 to April 2022. From the 1935 titles initially identified, 18 articles were finally included in the study and extracted data were qualitatively synthesized. It may be carefully concluded that e-cigarettes may cause attenuated clinical inflammatory signs of periodontitis and, hypothetically, of peri-implantitis when compared to conventional tobacco smoke. Both alternative smoking products, containing nicotine, may likewise exert negative effects on periodontal and peri-implant health, as demonstrated by in vitro studies. Further investigations are needed to assess the impact of electronic cigarettes and heat-not-burn tobacco products on periodontal and peri-implant health status.

Cannabis Vaping Among Youth and Young Adults: a Scoping Review

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this review was to describe the state-of-the-literature on research specific to cannabis vaping among youth and young adults.

Recent Findings

Out of 1801 records identified, a total of 202 articles met eligibility criteria for inclusion in this review. Most of this literature (46.0% of studies) was specific to the health effects of cannabis vaping, particularly EVALI (e-cigarette and vaping associated lung injury). Other research areas identified in the review included the etiology (24.3%) and epidemiology (24.8%) of cannabis vaping, in addition to articles on regulation (8.4%) and marketing (5.5%) of the same.

Summary

Cannabis vaping is increasingly common among youth and young adults and more prevalent is settings where recreational use for adults has been legalized. The literature documents a number of negative health effects of cannabis vaping for young people, along with risk factors and reasons for the same.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40429-022-00413-y.

Relationships between ENDS-Related Familial Factors and Oral Health among Adolescents in the United States

The influence of familial and social environments plays a significant role in Electronic Nicotine Delivery System (ENDS) use and may contribute to poor oral health among adolescents. This study utilized the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) database and included youths aged 12 to 17 years who reported no history of dental health issues at baseline. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) were used to examine the association between END-related familial factors and oral health among adolescents in the United States, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. The sample consisted of 3892 adolescents (weighted N = 22,689,793). Parents’ extremely negative reaction towards ENDS when they found their children using ENDS (AOR = 0.309) was connected to a lower risk of oral health issues. The findings suggest that clinicians and policymakers need to consider the roles of these factors when developing strategies to improve oral health outcomes.

Erosive potential of commonly available vapes: a cause for concern?

Objectives Relatively little is known about the erosive potential of vape products, an important consideration for dental health. This study analysed flavoured vapes with potentially low pH, including fruit and drink flavours.Methods The pH of 45 purposefully selected vapes was measured undiluted in triplicate. Serial dilution was conducted on the most erosive product to investigate if/when the erosive potential pH of 5.5 was reached. One of the most erosive samples was tested, undiluted and diluted, after four months of opening. Content analysis of the vape labels determined ingredients, place of manufacture, product usage instructions and health warnings.Results Eighty-four percent of undiluted vape samples had a pH below 5.5. Erosive potential was not predicted by the flavour, with orange and cola samples higher than anticipated (pH 3.56-6.23 and 5.04-5.63, respectively). Products that were predicted to be non-acidic such as vanilla showed considerable variation ranging from pH 4.69-5.63. Freshly opened or stored samples did not reach a non-erosive potential pH of 5.5 or above, even when diluted to represent concentrations used when vaped. Labels were not detailed enough to ascertain which ingredients were contributing to acidity or buffering capacity or to allow consumers to identify the least harmful products in terms of oral health.Conclusions Present labelling of commercially available vapes does not allow consumers to ascertain the erosive potential and possible dental damage that may be inflicted by their use. More effective labelling and/or health warnings are required to educate consumers and dental health professionals on these products.

New Zealand Youth19 survey: vaping has wider appeal than smoking in secondary school students, and most use nicotine-containing e-cigarettes

OBJECTIVE

To investigate smoking and vaping in secondary school students (aged 13-18 years) in New Zealand (NZ) following the introduction of 'pod' e-cigarettes, which have been associated with the rapid escalation of youth vaping elsewhere.

METHODS

Data on smoking and vaping were collected in 2019 as part of a comprehensive youth health survey (N=7,721).

RESULTS

Vaping was 2-3 times more prevalent than smoking, with 10% of students vaping regularly (monthly or more often), and 6% weekly or more often, compared with 4% and 2%, respectively, for tobacco smoking. Nicotine-containing e-cigarettes were sometimes or always used by 80% of regular and 90% of weekly vapers. Regular and weekly smoking was rare in low deprivation (affluent) areas, whereas regular and weekly vaping prevalence was similar across the socioeconomic spectrum. More than 80% of ever-vapers (N=2732) reported they were non-smokers when they first vaped, and 49% of regular vapers (N=718) had never smoked.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant proportion of New Zealand adolescents, many of whom have never smoked, use nicotine-containing e-cigarettes regularly. Implications for public health: Vaping is less harmful than smoking, but it is not harmless. Public health action is needed to support young non-smokers to remain smokefree and vape-free.

Association between vaping and untreated caries: A cross-sectional study of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017-2018 data

BACKGROUND

With the rise in the prevalence of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) and vaping products and the emergence of evidence indicating their cariogenic potential, it is essential to examine the association between vaping and untreated caries at a population level.

METHODS

The authors obtained data from the 2017-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and investigated the outcome variable-untreated caries-using oral health examination data. The authors applied multiple logistic regression analyses to assess the association between untreated caries and smoking (cigarette smoking, vaping, and both) while controlling for education, race or ethnicity, income, age, sex, and time since previous dental visit.

RESULTS

A total of 4,618 participants were included in the analyses for this cross-sectional study. Participants who currently smoked e-cigarettes were more likely to have untreated caries (odds ratio, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.24 to 2.29) than those who had never smoked, when adjusted for demographic variables. Similarly, dual smokers (e-cigarette and conventional smokers) were more likely to have untreated caries compared with nondual smokers (odds ratio, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.36 to 4.36).

CONCLUSION

Both vaping and dual smoking are associated with an increased occurrence of untreated caries.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Vaping status should be included as a part of health history questionnaires for patients. Dental professionals should be informed of the potential oral health implications of vaping and, in turn, impart this knowledge to patients.