Validity of the mini-mental state examination and the montreal cognitive assessment in the prediction of driving test outcome

Serial Trichotomization to Determine Fitness to Drive: Results From a Cohort of Clients Referred to a Neurology Program

IMPORTANCE

Determining cognitive fitness to drive is challenging. A previous study used serial trichotomization with five cognitive tests to determine whether drivers should continue driving, undergo further evaluation, or stop driving.

OBJECTIVE

To examine agreement between serial trichotomization and fitness-to-drive determinations made by occupational therapists.

DESIGN

Drivers referred for cognitive screens completed all tests used in the previous study. Occupational therapists provided fitness-to-drive recommendations (safe, indeterminate, or unsafe) using all clinical information available. We examined the agreement between the tests' results (using cut points from the previous study) and occupational therapists' recommendations.

SETTING

Outpatient neurology program at a chronic care and rehabilitation hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

279 clients (M age  = 66.35 yr; SD = 13.25).

OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Tests included the Trail Making Tests A and B, the Clock Drawing Test (CDT), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test, using a road test as the gold standard. The previous study used dual cut points with 100% sensitivity and specificity to reduce false positives and false negatives.

RESULTS

Weighted κs ranged from .03 (95% confidence interval [CI] [-.01, .08]) for the CDT to .54 (95% CI [.46, .62]) for the Trail Making Test, Part B. Although the agreement between serial trichotomization and the final recommendations was moderate (κ = .59; 95% CI [.50, .67]), serial trichotomization appeared useful for identifying unsafe drivers.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These results remind us of the variability inherent in stand-alone cognitive tests, even within a serial trichotomization framework, and the importance of clinical judgement and road tests in decision making about driving. Plain-Language Summary: It can be challenging for occupational therapists to accurately determine a client's cognitive fitness to drive. Many occupational therapists lack the time, have limited training, or do not have access to comprehensive driving evaluation tools. A serial testing approach can support occupational therapists in assessing a client's cognitive fitness to drive. This study used an approach based on a series of five cognitive tests to determine whether a client should continue driving, undergo further evaluation, or stop driving. The series of tests were used to classify drivers as safe, indeterminate, or unsafe. In principle, a driver would take the second test only if the driver was classified as indeterminate on the basis of first test, and so on. By applying the tests in sequence, few drivers should remain classified as indeterminate at the end of the series of tests. This serial approach has the potential to streamline the decision-making process for occupational therapists by classifying the more extreme unsafe cases while still providing an accurate assessment of cognitive fitness to drive.

The value of using the Addenbrookes Cognitive Exam-III and the Rookwood Driving Battery to aid fitness-to-drive decisions with people who have dementia or mild cognitive impairment

Introduction

Further evidence is required to support the use of a combination of a generalist cognitive screen Addenbrookes Cognitive Exam-III and a specialist neuropsychological driving screen Rookwood Driving Battery to aid occupational therapists in making fitness-to-drive decisions for people with dementia.

Method

An exploratory retrospective study was completed for drivers with dementia or mild cognitive impairment living within Scotland. Data were extracted from patient notes of drivers referred to occupational therapy, who had an ACE-III and RDB completed within a 6-month timeframe.

Results

The study sample included 98 participants. A significant negative correlation was identified between both assessments. Lower cut-off scores were identified on the ACE-III below which no participant scored Rookwood Driving Battery <6 (Addenbrookes Cognitive Exam-III cut-off = 65), or the upper Rookwood Driving Battery pass of ⩽10 (Addenbrookes Cognitive Exam-III cut-off = 54). A small subset of participants (n = 14) sat the on-road test. No participant passed on-road with a score >7 on the Rookwood Driving Battery.

Conclusion

The ACE-III is a useful guide for referral to occupational therapy for assessment using the Rookwood Driving Battery and subsequent fitness-to-drive decisions for people with dementia.

A Three-Tiered Comprehensive Driving Evaluation Integrating a Driving Simulator Test for Drivers with Borderline Cognitive Fitness-to-Drive: Proof of Concept

Comprehensive driving evaluations for older adults with cognitive impairment are time-consuming, expensive, and involve risk. To minimize these challenges, we evaluated a three-tiered driving evaluation process incorporating cognitive tests (Step 1), a driving simulator test (Step 2), and a road test (Step 3). Participants in this study were referred to a driving assessment center for concerns about cognitive fitness-to-drive. Each participant completed all three evaluation steps. Their fitness-to-drive was determined independently by an occupational therapist and an experienced driving evaluator with a driver instructor background. Our main objective was to examine the agreement between the occupational therapist's determination of fitness-to-drive after each step and the driving evaluator's determination of fitness-to-drive after the road test. As a secondary objective, the occupational therapist's confidence in their determinations was also examined. Results showed agreement for 38.8% of participants after Step 1, 46.5% after Step 2, and 92.3% after Step 3. The mean occupational therapist's confidence rating in their determination (scale of 0 to 100; higher is better) was 36.15 after Step 1, 49.54 after Step 2, and 90.54 after Step 3. All drivers deemed to have passed the evaluation had been identified as such after the driving simulator test. These results suggest that the best agreement between the occupational therapist and the driving evaluator was reached after the final step. However, the results also indicate that for some participants, a road test may not be required following a driving simulator test. Eliminating the road test in some instances may create efficiencies and reduce cost and risk while maintaining accurate determinations of fitness-to-drive.

Association Between Daily Mode of Transportation and Cognitive Function Among Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study

Background Changes in mode of transportation, such as driving cessation, elevate the risk of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease among older adults residing in communities. However, the association between transportation-related lifestyles and cognitive function in older adults with MCI remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the relationship between mobility independence and cognitive dysfunction among older patients with MCI. Methods This was a retrospective study of community-dwelling adults aged 65 years or older from Usuki, Oita Prefecture, Japan. Data from 117 participants with MCI were analyzed. Using the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scale, participants were categorized into independent and dependent mobility groups based on their mode of transportation. Cognitive function was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Japanese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-J), and scores were compared across modes of transportation. Results Significant differences were found in total MoCA-J scores, visuospatial executive function, naming, and orientation, and MMSE orientation of time and place, with higher scores observed in the independent mobility group compared to the dependent group (p < 0.05). Analysis of covariance further supported these findings, showing higher scores in total MoCA-J and MMSE scores in the independent mobility group. Conclusions This study highlights the relationship between daily mode of transportation and cognitive function in patients with MCI. Participants with independent mobility exhibited superior cognitive function compared to the dependent mobility group. These findings may contribute to the development of new interventions for preventing the transition from MCI to dementia by further validation of causal relationships in longitudinal or intervention studies.

An online driving decision aid for older drivers reduces ambivalence and regret about driving decisions: Randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Decisions about driving cessation can be stressful for older adults. We tested effects of a driving decision aid (DDA) on psychosocial outcomes among older drivers during two-year follow-up.

METHODS

Multisite randomized controlled trial of licensed drivers ages ≥70 with at least one diagnosis associated with increased likelihood of driving cessation, without significant cognitive impairment. The intervention was the online Healthwise® DDA, addressing "Is it time to stop driving?"; controls received National Institute on Aging web-based information for older drivers. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Primary outcomes were the Decision Regret Scale, Decisional Conflict Scale (assessing decisional ambivalence or uncertainty), and PROMIS Depression (4a) Scale. Self-reported Life-Space Assessment (assessing community mobility), crashes and driving outcomes were also assessed. Using intention-to-treat analyses, we tested whether DDA (vs. control) effects on each outcome differed during follow-up using a study group by time interaction. Longitudinal outcomes were modeled using generalized linear mixed models, accounting for repeated measures, age, site, and baseline visit before vs. during COVID.

RESULTS

We enrolled 301 participants (age at enrollment: mean 77.1 (range 70-92) years; 51% identifying as female). During follow-up, the DDA group had less decisional conflict (pinteraction = 0.010) and decision regret (pinteraction = 0.012). The DDA had its greatest effect on decisional conflict immediately post-intervention (adjusted mean ratio [aMR] = 0.87; 95%CI: 0.79, 0.97) and on decision regret at 12-month follow-up (aMR = 0.45; 95%CI: 0.27, 0.72). Odds of depression were similar between groups during follow-up (pinteraction = 0.237). The intervention did not negatively affect life space, crashes, or other driving outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In older drivers, the Healthwise® DDA reduced uncertainty and regret about driving decisions during longitudinal follow-up, without adversely affecting community mobility or crash risk. Use of DDAs in clinical and other settings may reduce the distress older adults often experience when making decisions about driving cessation.

Candrive-Development of a Risk Stratification Tool for Older Drivers

BACKGROUND

Assessing an older adult's fitness-to-drive is an important part of clinical decision making. However, most existing risk prediction tools only have a dichotomous design, which does not account for subtle differences in risk status for patients with complex medical conditions or changes over time. Our objective was to develop an older driver risk stratification tool (RST) to screen for medical fitness-to-drive in older adults.

METHODS

Participants were active drivers aged 70 and older from 7 sites across 4 Canadian provinces. They underwent in-person assessments every 4 months with an annual comprehensive assessment. Participant vehicles were instrumented to provide vehicle and passive Global Positioning System (GPS) data. The primary outcome measure was police-reported, expert-validated, at-fault collision adjusted per annual kilometers driven. Predictor variables included physical, cognitive, and health assessment measures.

RESULTS

A total of 928 older drivers were recruited for this study beginning in 2009. The average age at enrollment was 76.2 (standard deviation [SD] = 4.8) with 62.1% male participants. The mean duration for participation was 4.9 (SD = 1.6) years. The derived Candrive RST included 4 predictors. Out of 4 483 person-years of driving, 74.8% fell within the lowest risk category. Only 2.9% of person-years were in the highest risk category where the relative risk for at-fault collisions was 5.26 (95% confidence interval = 2.81-9.84) compared to the lowest risk group.

CONCLUSIONS

For older drivers whose medical conditions create uncertainty regarding their fitness-to-drive, the Candrive RST may assist primary health care providers when initiating a conversation about driving and to guide further evaluation.

Cognitive, psychological and social factors associated with older adults' mobility: a scoping review of self-report and performance-based measures

Although many factors have been associated with mobility among older adults, there is paucity of research that explores the complexity of factors that influence mobility. This review aims to synthesise the available evidence for factors comprising the cognitive, psychological, and social mobility determinants and their associations with mobility self-reported and performance-based outcomes in older adults (60 years). We followed Arksey and O'Malley's five stages of a scoping review and searched PubMed, EMBASE, PsychINFO, Web of Science, AgeLine, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Sociological Abstract databases. Reviewers in pairs independently conducted title, abstract, full-text screening and data extraction. We reported associations by analyses rather than articles because articles reported multiple associations for factors and several mobility outcomes. Associations were categorised as significantly positive, negative, or not significant. We included 183 peer-reviewed articles published in 27 countries, most of which were cross-sectional studies and conducted among community-dwelling older adults. The 183 articles reported 630 analyses, of which 381 (60.5%) were significantly associated with mobility outcomes in the expected direction. For example, older adults with higher cognitive functioning such as better executive functioning had better mobility outcomes (e.g., faster gait speed), and those with poor psychological outcomes, such as depressive symptoms, or social outcomes such as reduced social network, had poorer mobility outcomes (e.g., slower gait speed) compared to their counterparts. Studies exploring the association between cognitive factors, personality (a psychological factor) and self-reported mobility outcomes (e.g., walking for transportation or driving), and social factors and performance-based mobility outcomes in older adults are limited. Understanding the additive relationships between cognitive, psychological, and social factors highlights the complexity of older adults' mobility across different forms of mobility, including independence, use of assistive devices, transportation, and driving.

Inability of the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) and high-contrast visual acuity to identify unsafe drivers

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

To examine the validity of high-contrast visual acuity and the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) as tools for identifying at-risk older drivers.

DESIGN

Prospective multi-site observational cohort study.

SETTING

Community sample drawn from cities of Brisbane and Canberra, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

560 licensed drivers aged 65-96 years recruited between 2013 and 2016, from the community, an optometry clinic and driver referral service.

MEASUREMENTS

50-minute standardized on-road driving test conducted on a standard urban route in a dual-brake vehicle with a driver trained Occupational Therapist assessor masked to participants' cognitive, visual and medical status.

RESULTS

Of 560 participants who completed the on-road test, 68 (12%) were classified as unsafe. Binary logistic regression models adjusted for age, gender, site, comorbidity and driving exposure indicated that a 1-point decrease in MMSE score was associated with a 1.35 (95%CI: 1.12-1.63) increase in odds of unsafe driving, and for each line reduction in binocular visual acuity (increase of 0.1 logMAR) was associated with 1.39 (95%CI: 1.07-1.81) increased odds of unsafe driving. However, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis showed low discriminative power for both measures (MMSE: AUC = 0.65 (95%CI: 0.58-0.73), visual acuity: AUC = 0.65 (95%CI: 0.59-0.72)) and typical cut-offs were associated with very low sensitivity for identifying unsafe drivers (MMSE <24/30: 2%; visual acuity worse than 6/12 Snellen (logMAR >0.30): 3%).

CONCLUSION

The MMSE and high-contrast visual acuity tests do not reliably identify at-risk older drivers. They have extremely low sensitivity for detecting unsafe drivers, even when used together, and poor prognostic properties relative to validated screening instruments that measure cognitive, vision and sensorimotor functions relevant to driving. Clinicians should select alternate validated driver screening tools where possible.

Eye-head coordination and dynamic visual scanning as indicators of visuo-cognitive demands in driving simulator

Driving is an everyday task involving a complex interaction between visual and cognitive processes. As such, an increase in the cognitive and/or visual demands can lead to a mental overload which can be detrimental for driving safety. Compiling evidence suggest that eye and head movements are relevant indicators of visuo-cognitive demands and attention allocation. This study aims to investigate the effects of visual degradation on eye-head coordination as well as visual scanning behavior during a highly demanding task in a driving simulator. A total of 21 emmetropic participants (21 to 34 years old) performed dual-task driving in which they were asked to maintain a constant speed on a highway while completing a visual search and detection task on a navigation device. Participants did the experiment with optimal vision and with contact lenses that introduced a visual perturbation (myopic defocus). The results indicate modifications of eye-head coordination and the dynamics of visual scanning in response to the visual perturbation induced. More specifically, the head was more involved in horizontal gaze shifts when the visual needs were not met. Furthermore, the evaluation of visual scanning dynamics, based on time-based entropy which measures the complexity and randomness of scanpaths, revealed that eye and gaze movements became less explorative and more stereotyped when vision was not optimal. These results provide evidence for a reorganization of both eye and head movements in response to increasing visual-cognitive demands during a driving task. Altogether, these findings suggest that eye and head movements can provide relevant information about visuo-cognitive demands associated with complex tasks. Ultimately, eye-head coordination and visual scanning dynamics may be good candidates to estimate drivers' workload and better characterize risky driving behavior.

A Frontal Neuropsychological Profile in Fitness to Drive

Traffic accidents are a global concern due to the elevated mortality rates of both drivers and pedestrians. The World Health Organization declared 2011-2020 as the Decade of Action for Road Safety, endorsing initiatives to reduce traffic-related deaths. Yet, despite these incentives, fatal accidents still occur. Different studies have linked deficits in executive functions to risky driving attitudes and crashes. The present study focuses on demographic, cognitive and personality factors, related to the prefrontal cortex, that are characteristic of drivers prone to risky behavior behind the wheel. The penalty Points System was used to classify drivers as "safe", with no point loss over a two-year period, or "risky", with full point loss during the same interval. A neuropsychological assessment of prefrontal cognitive functions was carried out on each group to identify variables associated with safe and risky behavior. Neuropsychological indexes were obtained from a continuous performance task without cue (Simple Attention), a continuous performance task with cue (Conditioned Attention), the Tower of Hanoi test and the Neurologically-related Changes in Personality Inventory (NECHAPI). A Discriminant Analysis (DA) found that education level, reaction times in Simple and Conditioned Attention, learning errors in the Tower of Hanoi and vulnerability in the personality test, best predicted whether drivers were likely to be in the safe or risky group. Finally, a cross-validation analysis performed on the same sample correctly classified 87.5% of the drivers. These data suggest that prefrontal dysfunction contributes to risky behavior behind the wheel. The inclusion of cognitive programs to identify and train drivers with this propensity could reduce risky driving, and consequently, save lives on the road.

Off-road assessment of cognitive fitness to drive

Road safety is a major issue in every society. The assessment of driving ability with a real vehicle is a lengthy and costly process; therefore, there is a growing need for the development of a neuropsychological battery that can provide a fast and reliable evaluation of a person's cognitive fitness to drive. In the present study, we examined the relationship of an off-road lab-type test, namely, the Driving Scenes test, with performance on a driving simulator, as well as the influence of cognitive factors on driving ability as evaluated by Driving Scenes. Our results demonstrated a relationship between Driving Scenes and driving simulator performance. They also showed that some cognitive factors (namely, selective attention and verbal memory), were predictive of driving ability (as determined by the Driving Scenes test), but not others (namely visuospatial perception/memory, working memory, and visuospatial recognition). In addition, age strongly predicted performance on this test (younger age was associated with better performance). The conclusions derived from the present study highlight the need to identify off-road tools with high predictive value in assessing driving ability.

Driving-Related Adverse Events in the Elderly Men: A Population-Based Prospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

This study estimated the incidence of driving-related adverse events and examined the association of cognitive function with the risk of future driving-related adverse events in the elderly Korean male population.

METHODS

We analyzed 1,172 male drivers aged 60 years or older in the Korean Longitudinal Study on Cognitive Aging and Dementia (KLOSCAD). Using the data from Korean National Police Agency, we classified the participants into three groups: safe driving (drove for 2 years after baseline without a traffic accident or repeated violations), driving cessation (stopped driving), and risky driving (one or more traffic accidents or repeated violations). We estimated the incidences of driving cessation and risky driving, and examined the effect of cognitive function on their risks.

RESULTS

The incidence of driving cessation and risky driving in the Korean male drivers aged 60 years or older was 19.3 and 69.9 per 1,000 person-years respectively and increased in the late 80s. Drivers with better baseline Word List Memory Test scores showed less risky driving (OR=0.94, p=0.039).

CONCLUSION

Driving-related adverse events increased in late 80s, and better memory function was protective against these events.

Socio-demographic characteristics and cognitive performance in oldest old subjects asking for driving license renewal

Background

No papers have examined the relationship between socio-demographic characteristics and cognitive performance in oldest old subjects (i.e, > = 80 years old) asking for driving license renewal. We hypothesize that, even in this highly functioning population, age, sex, and education influence cognitive performance, expressed as total or single domain (raw) test scores. This research question allows to describe, identify, and preserve independence of subjects still able to drive safely.

Methods

We examined cross-sectionally a cohort of > = 80 years old subjects (at enrollment) asking for driving license renewal in the Milan area, Italy, 2011–2017. The analysis was restricted to 3378 first and 863 second visits where individual’s cognitive performance was evaluated. According to the study protocol, the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) test was administered at the first visit for driving license renewal and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test at the second visit, following an additional renewal request. Ordinary least squares regression models were fitted at either time points. In each model, we included age, sex, and education as independent variables, whereas the dependent variable was total or single domain score for either test. In total, we fitted 15 regression models to assess our research hypothesis.

Results

The median subject in our sample reached the maximum scores on domains targeting operational and tactical abilities implied in safe driving, but had sub-optimal scores in the long-term memory domain included among the strategic abilities. In multiple models, being > = 87 (versus 80- < 86 years old) significantly decreased the mean total and memory scores of MMSE, but not those of the MoCA. Females (versus males) had significantly higher mean total and long-term memory scores of either tests, but not other domains. Mean total and single domain scores increased for increasing education levels for either tests, with increments for high school graduates being ~ 2 of those with (at most) a junior high school diploma.

Conclusions

Sex and education, as well as age to a lesser extent, predict cognitive functioning in our oldest old population, thus confirming that concepts like cognitive reserve and successful ageing are valuable constructs in the identification of older subjects still able to drive.

Assessing and Counseling the Older Driver: A Concise Review for the Generalist Clinician

Older drivers are putting more miles on the road during their "golden years" than generations prior. Many older adults have safe driving habits, but unique age-related changes increase the risk for crash-related morbidity and mortality. Generalists are poised to assess and guide older adults' driving fitness. Although there is no uniformly accepted tool for driving fitness, assessment of 5 key domains (cognition, vision, physical function, medical comorbidities, and medications) using valid tools can help clinicians stratify older drivers into low, intermediate, and high risk for unsafe driving. Clinicians can then make recommendations about fitness to drive and appropriate referrals for rehabilitation or alternative transportation resources to optimize mobility, independence, and quality of life for older adults.

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the MMSE and MoCA questionnaires in Tanzanian Swahili for a traumatic brain injury population

BACKGROUND

Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is the most common cause of injury-related death and disability globally, and a common sequelae is cognitive impairment. Addressing post-TBI cognitive deficits is crucial because they affect rehabilitation outcomes, but doing this requires valid and reliable cognitive assessment measures. However, no such instrument has been validated in Tanzania's TBI population. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) are two commonly used instruments to measure cognitive impairment, and there have been a few studies reporting their use in post-TBI cognitive assessment. Our aim was to report the psychometric properties of the Swahili version of both scales amongst the TBI population in Tanzania.

METHODS

A cross-cultural adaptation committee participated in the translation and content validation process for both questionnaires. Our patient sample consisted of 192 adults with TBI who were admitted to Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center (KCMC) in Tanzania. Confirmatory factor analysis, reliability and external validity were evaluated.

RESULTS

MoCA showed adequate factor loadings (values > 0.50 for all items except items 7 & 10) and adequate reliability (values > 0.70). Factor loadings for most of the MMSE items were below 0.5 and internal consistency was medium (< 0.7). Polychoric correlation between MMSE and MoCA was strong, positive and statistically significant (r = 0.68, p = 0.001); correlation with the cognitive subscale of FIM indicated moderately positive relationships - MMSE (r = 0.35, p = 0.001) and MoCA (r = 0.43, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

With the exception of the language and memory items, MoCA is a valid and reliable instrument for cognitive impairment screening in Tanzania's adult TBI population. On the other hand, MMSE does not appear to be an appropriate tool in this patient group, but its positive correlations with MoCA and cFIM indicate similar theoretical concepts. Both instruments require further validation studies to prove their predictive ability for screening cognitive impairment before they are considered suitable for clinical use.

Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioral Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Screen (ECAS) in Norway: Protocol for validation and a prospective cohort study

In amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) cognitive impairment may occur. This could detrimentally influence communication between patient and health-care professionals and make clinical assessment difficult. Given the short life expectancy after diagnosis, it is crucial to accurately identify ALS patients early. Although suitable cognitive screening tools for patients with ALS are available, they have not been evaluated in a Norwegian population. Interpretation of scores for available tests and practical application of scoring is also not well established. The protocol described here involves two related studies that aim to improve the quality of ALS clinical testing instruments used in the Norwegian population. The first is a validation study that evaluates the psychometric properties of the ECAS-Norwegian. The second is a prospective cohort study that evaluates the ECAS-Norwegian as a tool to predict early changes in ability to work, drive a car and the need for advanced therapy. Study 1 is a multicenter study using international quality criteria. Patients with ALS, healthy control subjects, and control subjects with dementia will be included. Primary outcome is ECAS-Norwegian scores. In study 2, patients with ALS will be included. ECAS-Norwegian compared to Clinical Dementia Rating score and Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores will be used as a prognostic tool for working, driving, and initiating advanced life-prolonging therapy. Before clinical implementation, the ECAS-Norwegian needs to be evaluated and validated. Successful validation and implementation of the ECAS-Norwegian may provide early identification of cognitive impairment in ALS, leading to more proactive, individualized treatment.

Relationships Between Older Drivers' Cognitive Abilities as Assessed on the MoCA and Glance Patterns During Visual-Manual Radio Tuning While Driving

Objective

Research has established that long off-road glances increase crash risk, and other work has shown increased off-road glance behavior in older drivers. This study investigated the relationship between older drivers' (M = 66.3, range 61-69 years) cognitive abilities and the duration of off-road glances while engaged in secondary visual-manual activities.

Method

Twenty-two drivers completed the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) prior to driving an instrumented vehicle and completing a set of radio-tuning tasks. Glance behavior was recorded and manually coded into 7 glance regions (toward the forward roadway, instrument cluster, center stack, rearview mirror, left, right, and other).

Results

On average, older drivers with higher MoCA scores used shorter glances and glanced away from the forward roadway for less total time when manually tuning the radio.

Discussion

These findings suggest that lower MoCA scores may represent a driving force behind the "age" differences reported in earlier studies of off-road glance behavior. Questions are raised concerning the identification of MoCA scores that might be used as inclusion cut-points in driving research and in identifying individuals needing further evaluation related to suitability for continuance of driving.

Driving Dilemmas: A Guide to Driving Assessment in Primary Care

Clinical assessment of fitness to drive can be a challenging part of primary care of older adults. There are no guidelines on screening for driver safety, so it falls to provider judgment on when to assess older drivers. This review offers recommendations on when to assess for driver safety based on red flag conditions, medications, acute events, and patient or family concerns. It reviews how to assess for visual, cognitive, and neuromuscular impairments and what to do as next steps for at-risk drivers once they are identified. Laws regarding driver reporting are also reviewed.

Cognitive Decline and Older Driver Crash Risk

OBJECTIVES

To examine automobile crash risk associated with cognition in older drivers without dementia.

DESIGN

Retrospective secondary analysis of longitudinal cohort study.

SETTING

Our study used data from the Adult Changes in Thought (ACT) Study merged with Washington State crash reports and licensure records. Data were available from 2002 to 2015.

PARTICIPANTS

Group Health enrollees from Washington State aged 65 and older with active driver's licenses (N=2,615).

MEASUREMENTS

Cognitive function was assessed using the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument scored using item response theory (CASI-IRT). The study outcome was police-reported motor vehicle crash. We used a negative binomial mixed-effects model with robust standard errors clustered on the individual and considered associations between crash risk, level of cognition, and amount of decline since the previous study visit. Covariates included age, sex, education, alcohol, depression, medical comorbidities, eyesight, hearing, and physical function. Individuals were censored at dementia diagnosis, death, or failure to renew their license.

RESULTS

Over an average of 7 years of follow-up, 350 (13%) people had at least one crash. A 1-unit lower CASI-IRT score was associated with a higher adjusted incidence rate ratio of crash of 1.26 (95% confidence interval=1.08-1.51). Beyond level of cognition, amount of cognitive decline between study visits was not associated with crash risk.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that, in older drivers, poorer performance on the CASI-IRT may be a risk factor for motor vehicle crashes, even in individuals without diagnosed dementia. Further research is needed to understand driving behavior and inform driving decisions for older adults with poor cognitive function.

Associação entre cognição e habilitação para direção veicular em idosos

Objetivo: analizar la asociación entre la cognición y los resultados finales de los exámenes de aptitud física y mental para habilitación vehicular en adultos mayores.Método: Se trata de un estudio transversal realizado en clínicas de tránsito acreditadas para realizar exámenes de habilitación vehicular. La muestra del tipo probabilística fue constituida por 421 adultos mayores (≥ 60 años). Los datos fueron colectados por medio de Mini Examen del Estado Mental (MEEM) y consulta en el Registro Nacional de Conductores Habilitados. Para el análisis de los datos se utilizó estadística descriptiva y aplicación de los testes Kruskal-Wallis y Qui-cuadrado. Los valores de p≤0,05 indicaron significancia estadística.Resultados: Para el MEEM el puntaje promedio fue de 27,13 ± 2,53 puntos, 92,2 % (n =388) presentaron cognición normal y 7,8 % (n =33) comprometimiento cognitivo. En cuanto a los resultados de las pruebas de aptitud física y mental para habilitación vehicular 71,5 % (n =301) se consideraron aptos con restricción, el 21,9 % (n =92) aptos y el 6,7 % (n =28) inaptos temporales. Se observó una asociación significativa entre los resultados de la habilitación vehicular y los escores cognitivos (p<0,001) y no hubo asociación a las categorías cognitivas (p =0,172). Los escores más bajos de cognición se identificaron en ancianos aptos con restricción e inaptos temporalmente. Conclusión: Los resultados evidencian la inconsistencia del MEEM para evaluar la cognición. Se recomienda a las clínicas de tránsito la utilización del MEEM con cautela, como herramienta de evaluación cognitivo en conductores adultos mayores. 

Errors versus speed on the trail making test: Relevance to driving performance

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Many studies have demonstrated that speed to complete items on the Trail Making Tests (TMT A and TMT B) is useful in the prediction of driving safety. However, there is no consensus regarding optimal "cut scores" to discriminate between safe and unsafe drivers. In this study, we examine TMT speed and errors in drivers referred for a road test.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

SETTING

Patients referred for a DriveWise® evaluation at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, Massachusetts.

PARTICIPANTS

Drivers age 65 or older were included (total n = 373). Forty-five percent of the sample had been diagnosed with Cognitive Impairment (CI) whereas the remaining participants were in the No Cognitive Impairment (NCI) group.

MEASUREMENTS

TMT Parts A & B, Folstein Mini Mental Status Examination, Washington University Road Test.

RESULTS

CI drivers with TMT A speed exceeding 46 s were more likely to fail the road test whereas TMT B speed was not a sensitive metric in this group. In the No Cognitive Impairment (NCI) group, TMT B speed exceeding 131 s predicted driving impairment whereas TMT A speed was not sensitive. Error scores were not useful in the determination of driving fitness for either group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides useful criteria for health providers working with older people in the determination of driving fitness. Results suggest that TMT speed, but not error rate, is associated with road test performance. Based on our work, we advocate that pre-existing dementia should be taken into consideration when using TMT performance as a screen for driving.

Non-frail elderly people and their license to drive motor vehicles

OBJECTIVE

to analyse the link between the non-frailty condition and the results of driving license for elderly people to drive motor vehicles.

METHOD

cross-sectional study with data collection in the sample period from August 2015 to March 2016. Study performed with 347 elderlies (≥60 years).

RESULTS

180 (51.9%) of the participants were classified as non-frail. 48 (26.7%) of them were considered capable to drive, 121 (67.2%) capable to drive with restrictions and 11 (6.1%) temporarily uncapable. No significant relation was found between the non-frailty conditions and the results of the motor vehicles driving license study (p=0.557).

CONCLUSION

The absence of physical frailty does not necessarily points out that the elderly are able to drive motor vehicles. Tracking the frailty subsidizes preventive interventions, which seek to interfere positively in the act of driving. This is an unprecedented study in nursing and it highlights an essential field for the performance of gerontological nursing.

CE: Can Your Older Patients Drive Safely?

: In many areas of the world, driving is an essential part of life and for reasons of comfort, convenience, and security remains the primary mode of transportation among older adults. Both normal aging and diseases that are more prevalent in advanced age can substantially reduce older drivers' functional abilities, elevating their risk of involvement in motor vehicle accidents and serious injury or death. Identifying and intervening with older drivers at increased crash risk is an important aspect of preventive medicine. The authors discuss the specific driving risks adults face as they age and how nurses can raise older patients' awareness of these risks. They also discuss the importance of connecting older adults to community resources that may help them continue driving safely for a longer period or find alternative transportation options.

Driving and dementia: a clinical update for mental health professionals

Most people with mild dementia can continue to drive, but dementia is progressive and many patients and clinicians will be faced with questions about driving safety in the course of their illness. Determining when this happens is a complex decision, with risks of personal and public safety needing to be weighed against individual patient benefits of driving in terms of autonomy, independence and well-being. Decisions need to make reference to cognitive abilities, as well as other factors including physical comorbidity, vision, mobility, insight and history of driving errors and accidents. Deciding to stop driving, or being required to stop driving is often difficult for patients to accept and can be a particularly problematic consequence of a dementia diagnosis. Legal frameworks help in decision-making but may not provide sufficient detail to advise individual patients. We review the current guidelines and evidence relating to driving and dementia to help clinicians answer questions about driving safety and to consider the full range of assessment tools available.

Neuropsychological Assessment of Driving Capacity

Clinicians are increasingly requested to make determinations regarding patients' driving capacity in the context of neurological injury/conditions and a growing cohort of older drivers. The capability to drive safely involves a number of cognitive, physical, and sensorimotor abilities that may be impacted by injury, illness, or substances that influence alertness. Neuropsychological measures are an important component of a multidisciplinary approach for evaluation of driving capacity. Clinicians should become familiar with measures that have the best predictive validity so they may incorporate a patient's neurocognitive strengths and weaknesses in decisions about driving ability.

Functional Changes and Driving Performance in Older Drivers: Assessment and Interventions

With the increasing aging of the population, the number of older drivers is rising. Driving is a significant factor for quality of life and independence concerning social and working life. On the other hand, driving is a complex task involving visual, motor, and cognitive skills that experience age-related changes even in healthy aging. In this review we summarize different age-related functional changes with relevance for driving concerning sensory, motor, and cognitive functions. Since these functions have great interindividual variability, it is necessary to apply methods that help to identify older drivers with impaired driving abilities in order to take appropriate measures. We discuss three different methods to assess driving ability, namely the assessment of (i) functions relevant for driving; (ii) driving behavior in real traffic; and (iii) behavior in a driving simulator. We present different measures to improve mobility in older drivers, including information campaigns, design of traffic and car environment, instructions, functional training, and driving training in real traffic and in a driving simulator. Finally, we give some recommendations for assessing and improving the driving abilities of older drivers with multi-modal approaches being most promising for enhancing individual and public safety.