How does bone microanatomy and musculature covary? An investigation in the forelimb of two species of martens (Martes foina, Martes martes)

Exploration of the covariation signal between cortical bone and dentine volumes across the upper limb bones and anterior teeth in modern humans and relevance to evolutionary anthropology

Cortical bone and dentine are two mineralized tissues sharing a common embryological origin, developmental, and genetic background, distinct from those of enamel. Understanding their relationship is crucial to decipher the factors acting on their postnatal development, and shedding light on the evolutionary patterns of tissue proportions. Here, we investigate the coordinated variation between cortical bone and dentine volumes measured from arm and forearm bones (humeri, ulnae, radii) and upper anterior teeth (central incisors, lateral incisors, canines) of modern humans. Given the shared characteristics of cortical bone and dentine, we expect similarities in their postnatal development, which may lead to covariation between their volumes. The degree of bone-dentine covariation may be influenced by the physiological response of upper limb bones to mechanical loading. No such covariation is expected with enamel volumes, due to the greater developmental independence of bone and enamel. Our sample includes 55 adults of African and European ancestries from South African osteological collections. Principal component analysis of cortical thickness variation along the shafts of paired humeri, ulnae, and radii is used to assess asymmetry. Bone regions with bilateral asymmetry in cortical bone thickness are considered sensitive to functional loads, while regions with minimal bilateral variation likely reflect genetic influences during bone postnatal development. Statistical analyses reveal strong positive correlations between cortical bone and dentine volumes across all bones and teeth, and weaker correlations between cortical bone and enamel. We outline a complex pattern of bone-dentine covariation that varies by skeletal location and tooth type. Contrary to our expectations, the presumed functional sensitivity of bone regions does not influence the covariation signal. Additionally, the strength of the covariation appears to align with the developmental sequence of the anterior teeth, with the upper canines showing the strongest correlation with cortical bone volumes, followed by lateral and central incisors. These results provide insights into the functional and biological factors influencing the coordinated variation of cortical bone and dentine volumes during postnatal development. Further research on the cortical bone-dentine covariation across different skeletal parts, including lower limb elements, would enhance our understanding of the effects of both endogenous and exogenous factors on the development of the mineralized tissues.

Estimation of the forces exerted on the limb long bones of a white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum) using musculoskeletal modelling and simulation

Heavy animals incur large forces on their limb bones, due to the transmission of body weight and ground reaction forces, and the contractions of the various muscles of the limbs. This is particularly true for rhinoceroses, the heaviest extant animals capable of galloping. Several studies have examined their musculoskeletal system and the forces their bones incur, but no detailed quantification has ever been attempted. Such quantification could help understand better the link between form and function in giant land animals. Here we constructed three-dimensional musculoskeletal models of the forelimb and hindlimb of Ceratotherium simum, the heaviest extant rhino species, and used static optimisation (inverse) simulations to estimate the forces applied on the bones when standing at rest, including magnitudes and directions. Overall, unsurprisingly, the most active muscles were antigravity muscles, which generate moments opposing body weight (thereby incurring the ground reaction force), and thus keep the joints extended, avoiding joint collapse via flexion. Some muscles have an antigravity action around several joints, and thus were found to be highly active, likely specialised in body weight support (ulnaris lateralis; digital flexors). The humerus was subjected to the greatest amount of forces in terms of total magnitude; forces on the humerus furthermore came from a great variety of directions. The radius was mainly subject to high-magnitude compressive joint reaction forces, but to little muscular tension, whereas the opposite pattern was observed for the ulna. The femur had a pattern similar to that of the humerus, and the tibia's pattern was intermediate, being subject to great compression in its caudal side but to great tension in its cranial side (i.e. bending). The fibula was subject to by far the lowest force magnitude. Overall, the forces estimated were consistent with the documented morphofunctional adaptations of C. simum's long bones, which have larger insertion areas for several muscles and a greater robusticity overall than those of lighter rhinos, likely reflecting the intense forces we estimated here. Our estimates of muscle and bone (joint) loading regimes for this giant tetrapod improve the understanding of the links between form and function in supportive tissues and could be extended to other aspects of bone morphology, such as microanatomy.