Fractional ablative carbon dioxide laser treatment of facial scars: Improvement of patients' quality of life, scar quality, and cosmesis

Have the recent advancements in wound repair and scar management technology improved the quality of life in burn patients?

BACKGROUND

The negative physical and psychosocial impact of scars, in particular burn scars, has been well documented. Altered personal appearance together with impaired function related to pain, heat intolerance, and contracture formation may last a lifetime and eventually can lead to low self-esteem and poor social and psychological adjustments. Though most patients recover within the first years and many report generally good life satisfaction and moderate quality of life (QoL), some severely burned patients continue to report impaired QoL almost 10 years after injury. It is repeatedly mentioned in the literature that patients' QoL and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) can be improved by improving wound healing and burn scar quality. Determining whether advances in burn wound healing and scar management modalities are positively impacting the lives of surviving patients is the aim of this review.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was used to identify studies measuring QoL of patients surviving severe burn injuries following various interventions to improve burn wound healing and scar quality.

RESULTS

A limited number of studies was identified. Given the limited available data, a narrative review approach including qualitative studies and reviews in addition to identifying common themes, trends, and gaps in the existing literature was deemed more appropriate for a comprehensive analysis.

CONCLUSION

The assumption that progress made in recent decades to improve burn wound healing and scar quality would improve QoL remains largely hypothetical. Except for functional release of burn scar contractures, improved scar aesthetic quality does not necessarily translate into improved QoL of surviving patients. Well-designed comparative studies are largely lacking.

Assessment of ultra-pulse CO2 laser therapy in comparison to sequential laser and drug treatments for scar reduction

Scar management, particularly for early proliferative burn scars, remains a clinical challenge. This study assesses the efficacy of ultra-pulse carbon dioxide (CO2) laser therapy in comparison to sequential laser therapy and pharmacological interventions for scar reduction. A retrospective evaluation was conducted from January 2016 to March 2019 involving 200 patients with early proliferative burn scars treated at the Burn and Plastic Surgery Department of our institution. Participants were assigned to 4 groups: Group A received ultra-pulse CO2 laser therapy, Group B underwent sequential pulsed dye laser therapy, Group C received sequential laser therapy combined with pharmacological treatment, and a control group received no intervention. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale. Efficacy was evaluated based on scar characteristics and pain scores. Demographic characteristics across all groups were comparable, with no significant differences noted (P > .05). The clinical efficacy assessment revealed that the overall effective rates for Group A, Group B, and Group C were 80.00%, 96.00%, and 98.00%, respectively. Groups B and C not only exhibited significantly higher effective rates but also demonstrated marked improvements in scar characteristics as measured by the VSS, including reduced erythema and thickness. Additionally, pain scores during treatment were lowest in Group C, indicating better tolerability compared to the other modalities (P < .05). Sequential laser therapy improves the clinical efficacy for early proliferative burn scars, enhancing scar characteristics overall. When combined with pretreatment pharmacotherapy, this approach also reduces patient pain during treatment. These results highlight the benefits of integrating sequential laser and drug therapies in scar management.

Impact of Fractional Ablative Laser Therapy on Function, Symptoms, and Quality of Life in the Management of Traumatic Scars: A Review

OBJECTIVES

A substantial and expanding body of literature addresses the safety and efficacy of fractional ablative laser therapy for traumatic scarring resulting from burns and other trauma. However, available scar research commonly employs standardized assessment scales that generally do not directly address the impact on function and overall quality of life. Unlike past reviews, this manuscript will explore available evidence with a focus explicitly on function and quality of life (QoL) outcomes and de-emphasize surrogate outcome measures that rely primarily on visual characteristics.

METHODS

Through literature review conducted up to January 2024, the authors examined relevant studies focusing on function and quality of life outcomes in traumatic and burn scar management with fractional ablative laser therapy. PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library were utilized as primary databases. Reference lists were secondarily reviewed to supplement the literature review process. Studies that did not highlight functional or QoL endpoints or were not in the English language were excluded.

RESULTS

The reviewed studies demonstrated that fractional ablative therapy led to consistent significant and meaningful improvements in functional outcomes, relief from pruritus and pain, and overall enhancements in quality of life for patients with traumatic scarring. Adverse events associated with fractional ablative therapy were infrequent and generally of mild severity, indicating a favorable safety profile.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings from this literature review document ample existing evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of fractional ablative therapy to enhance function, mobility, reduce pruritus and pain, and improve overall QoL. Fractional ablative laser therapy should be integrated more widely into standard management protocols. Given the previous reliance on standardized scar assessment tools that heavily integrate visual characteristics, future studies should prioritize functional and QoL outcomes to further advance scar management protocols and optimize patient care.

Efficacy and safety of sequential treatment with botulinum toxin type A, fractional CO2 laser, and topical growth factor for hypertrophic scar management: a retrospective analysis

Hypertrophic scars arise from aberrant wound healing and can lead to functional and aesthetic impairments. One of the common interventions for treating hypertrophic scars is fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser, which employs narrow laser beams to stimulate dermal collagen deposition. Recent studies and reports have suggested that combining laser therapy with other interventions such as botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) and topical growth factors may enhance treatment outcomes. Here, we examine the efficacy and safety of a sequential combination of BTX-A, fractional CO2 laser, and topical growth factors, referred to as combined therapy, for treating hypertrophic scars compared with only using fractional CO2 laser and topical growth factors, referred to as monotherapy. Our retrospective study includes 128 patients with hypertrophic scars (56 underwent monotherapy and 72 underwent combined therapy), which were followed-up for up to 15 months after the initiation of treatment to collect demographic and clinical data. Our analysis showed that the combined therapy significantly outperformed monotherapy in improving Vancouver scar scale scores (P < 0.05) and in the reduction of scar thickness (P < 0.05), without increasing adverse complications. Repeated treatments further augmented the efficacy of the combined therapy. Subgroup analysis revealed that combined therapy was notably more effective in reducing Vancouver scar scale scores and scar thickness in early-stage scars compared to late-stage (P = 0.023 and P = 0.045, respectively). Our study suggests that including BTX-A treatment before fractional CO2 laser and topical growth factors offers superior efficacy in reducing hypertrophic scars. We encourage early intervention and repeated treatments for optimal treatment outcomes.

Timing of Laser Intervention on Facial Scars: A 3D Imaging and Scar Scale Analysis in a Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVES

Scars resulting from injuries or surgical procedures often present both physical and aesthetic challenges. Recent studies have indicated promising results in improving postoperative scar outcomes through the combined use of specific laser technologies. Nevertheless, there remains a crucial need for further exploration to ascertain the optimal timing for initiating such treatments.

METHODS

In this retrospective investigation, a cohort of 47 adult patients who did not require hospitalization was analyzed. These patients were divided into two distinct groups: Group A, which received intervention beginning 2 weeks after their respective operations, and Group B, which commenced intervention 4 weeks postoperation. Each group underwent a comprehensive treatment protocol consisting of five laser sessions. Initially, patients underwent three sessions of V-beam pulsed-dye laser (PDL) therapy followed by two sessions of ablative fractional CO2 laser (AFL) therapy. Evaluation of outcomes was conducted using advanced imaging techniques such as Antera 3D imaging, in conjunction with established scar assessment tools including the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and the University of North Carolina "4P" Scar Scale (UNC4P).

RESULTS

All patients successfully completed the full course of five treatment sessions, with no dropouts and no reported adverse events. Baseline cosmetic assessments of scars were equivalent across both groups. In Group A, the mean VSS scores decreased from 7.04 before treatment to 5.29 at 3 months posttreatment and further to 4.33 at 6 months posttreatment. Meanwhile, in Group B, scores decreased from 7.52 to 6.83 at 3 months and 6.17 at 6 months. There were no statistically significant differences in baseline VSS scores between the two groups (p = 0.34). At both the 3- and 6-month follow-up points, mean VSS scores were significantly lower in Group A compared to Group B (p < 0.05). Similar trends were observed in UNC4P scores. Statistically significant differences were noted across all time points (baseline, 3 months, and 6 months posttreatment) for both VSS and UNC4P scores (p < 0.05). Subset analysis revealed greater improvements in texture and depression volume at 3 months posttreatment, while improvements in depression area, depth, elevation variation, and area were more pronounced at the 6-month mark.

CONCLUSIONS

Early intervention using the combined 595-nm pulse dye laser and CO2 ablative fractional laser (AFL) 2- and 4-weeks post-surgery proves to be an effective and safe method for improving scar outcomes, particularly for facial surgical scars when treatment starts 2 weeks after surgery. However, further research is needed to refine our understanding and address potential study limitations.

Navigating Laser Treatments for Scars: The Physical and Emotional Journey

INTRODUCTION

The physical and emotional burden that scars impose on people's lives has been the concern of dermatological research for quite some time. Usually, the available literature on the topic draws a grim image containing solely dry medical facts. The present study deviates from this approach by reflecting a solution-centered study which has also touched on the quotidian life of an average person. The overall intention of the present experiment was to inspect how a holistic approach to scars in dermatology can be crucial for the patient's quality of life.

METHODS

This pilot study compiles data collected through the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) from the same set of patients within the span of a year. Sixty patients with diverse scar profiles were asked to rate POSAS and DLQI in every session. A combination of EBDs was used based on the scar examination. Student's t-test was run to validate the data.

RESULTS

The evaluations by POSAS and DLQI indicate significant improvement in the physical aspect of the scar as well as the patient quality of life a year after the first treatment. According to mean values collected from POSAS, there is a direct correlation between average patient evaluations and physician assessments. Thus, EBDs prove to be efficient in improving the QoL of scar patient. The 20 patients who had reported mild side effects after treatments recovered fully within a few days after the sessions. No patient reported severe side effects.

DISCUSSION

Apart from the physical indications that scars bring about into patients' lives, the psychological repercussions caused by scars have a major effect on the QoL of the patients. These repercussions can be divided into individual and social. At the individual level, scars have a profoundly negative effect on the image of the self which leads to several different psychological complications by time. At the social level, scars affect the radius of physical movement besides the quality of the patient's activities. Therefore, EBDs as effective treatment methods can improve itchiness, pain, and so forth, of the patient, and can also improve the psychological aspect.

CONCLUSION

All in all, the present study aims to produce a more panoramic perspective on the concern of scars in the field of dermatology, centering around EBDs as a solution for improving scar patient QoL. With a focus on the efficacy of EBDs in the scar treatment, and with reference to studies on the topic, it is safe to assume that the earlier the scar treatment initiates, the better the outcomes. Departing from this point, in the future of cosmetic dermatology, prepping the skin by EBD treatments before surgery is imaginable.

Recent Trends in Plastic Surgery: A Network Analysis of the Abstract Titles of the Largest German Plastic Surgery Congress 2023

BACKGROUND

Every year, German-speaking experts in plastic, reconstructive, and aesthetic surgery gather to discuss the latest developments at Germany's largest conference for plastic surgery, the joint annual meeting of the German Society of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery (DGPRÄC) and the Association of German Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (VDÄPC). Since the topics of the conference have a lasting impact on the practice and research of plastic surgery, an examination of the presented content provides insight into the driving developments in plastic surgery in Germany.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective network analysis of all abstract titles from the DGPRÄC and VDÄPC annual meeting in 2023. Data were extracted regarding titles, language, author, and place of origin, and the titles were categorized into the four pillars of the specialty. The titles were standardized and subjected to network analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 299 titles from 281 lectures and 18 instructional courses were analyzed. After preprocessing the data, 2463 words with 9384 connections qualified for network analysis. The most frequently mentioned keywords throughout the congress were 'Surgery', 'Breast', 'Reconstruction', 'Flap', 'Patient', 'Tissue', and 'Therapy'. Locations contributing the highest number of abstracts were Ludwigshafen, Hanover, Leipzig, and Munich.

CONCLUSION

In the era of big data, network analysis provides the ability to identify underlying structures and nodes in multidimensional, complex datasets. This study demonstrates the useful application of network analysis to identify thematic focuses and connections at the current DGPRÄC and VDÄPC annual meeting. Sites of intensified research could thus be identified.

The impact on quality-of-life following treatment of surgical facial scars with laser-based therapy: a scoping review

Post-surgical scarring impacts quality of life (QOL) and is a significant source of morbidity. Existing treatments targeted at improving the appearance and morbidity of scarring include laser-based therapies. Although lasers are frequently used to improve scar appearance, the effects on QOL are unclear. A scoping review was conducted to assess the impact of laser-based therapy for patients with surgical facial scarring on QOL. Throughout literature review was conducted with the guidance of a medical librarian. Relevant articles underwent two rounds of screening by two, independent reviewers. Data were extracted from each article and later analyzed. Of the four articles analyzed, laser-based therapies were demonstrated as effective in improving QOL for patients with facial scars resultant from surgical intervention. Laser-based therapy should be considered when treating facial scarring resultant from surgical intervention, as it has been shown to improve patient QOL. Standardization of QOL assessment and further studies expanding scar inclusion should be pursued given the paucity of information found through this review.

The Measure of a Scar: Patient Perceptions and Scar Optimization after Skin Cancer Reconstruction

In facial reconstruction after skin cancer resection, management and optimization of postoperative scar is a complex paradigm. Every scar is unique and presents a different challenge-whether due to anatomic, aesthetic, or patient-specific factors. This necessitates a comprehensive evaluation and an understanding of the tools at hand to improve its appearance. How a scar looks is meaningful to patients, and the facial plastic and reconstructive surgeon is tasked with its optimization. Clear documentation of a scar is critical to assess and determine optimal care. Scar scales such as the Vancouver Scar Scale, the Manchester Scar Scale, the Patient and Observer Assessment Scale, the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating "SCAR" Scale, and FACE-Q, among others, are reviewed here in the context of evaluating postoperative or traumatic scar. Measurement tools objectively describe a scar and may also incorporate the patient's assessment of their own scar. In addition to physical exam, these scales quantify scars that are symptomatic or visually unpleasant and would be best served by adjuvant treatment. The current literature regarding the role of postoperative laser treatment is also reviewed. While lasers are an excellent tool to assist in blending of scar and decreasing pigmentation, studies have failed to evaluate laser in a consistent, standardized way that allows for quantifiable and predictable improvement. Regardless, patients may derive benefit from laser treatment given the finding of subjective improvement in their own perception of scar, even when there is not a significant change to the clinician's eye. This article also discusses recent eye fixation studies which demonstrate the importance of careful repair of large and central defects of the face, and that patients value the quality of the reconstruction.

Vacuum and Electromagnetic Fields Treatment to Regenerate a Diffuse Mature Facial Scar Caused by Sulfuric Acid Assault

Acid attacks are on the rise, and they cause extensive and deep burns, especially on the face. The treatments used to improve the aesthetic, functional and social impact of non-acid scars do not always prove useful for acid scars. This article reports the case of a woman with an extended, mature, acid facial scar, caused by sulfuric acid assault, treated with a recent new procedure that combines the application of vacuum and electromagnetic fields. Before and after the treatment, the aesthetic appearance, and motor function of the face and neck were evaluated, as well as the level of hydration, the amount of sebum, the elasticity, and the pH of the skin. The improvements highlighted after the treatment of the aesthetic and functional characteristics of the face and neck, and of the physical parameters of the skin seemed to indicate that this particular treatment induces tissue regeneration, even in the nerve component. However, it is evident that the rehabilitation pathways of facial wounds and scars must be personalized, and must include continuous psychological support for the patient.

Keloid Patient Plasma-Derived Exosomal hsa_circ_0020792 Promotes Normal Skin Fibroblasts Proliferation, Migration, and Fibrogenesis via Modulating miR-193a-5p and Activating TGF-β1/Smad2/3 Signaling

Background

Keloids are fibroproliferative disorders, which seriously affect the quality of life of patients with keloids. Additionally, circRNAs are enriched within exosomes derived from human blood samples, whereas their relationship with keloids remains largely unknown. It has been reported that hsa_circ_0020792 was abnormally upregulated in keloid tissues. However, the role of keloid patient plasma-derived exosomal hsa_circ_0020792 in the formation and development of keloids is not well understood.

Methods

Exosomes were isolated from the peripheral blood plasma of the patients with keloids (keloid patient-Exo) and healthy controls (Healthy control-Exo). The hsa_circ_0020792 and miR-193a-5p levels in keloid patient-Exo and healthy control-Exo, as well as in keloid fibroblasts and normal skin fibroblasts (NFs) were evaluated by RT-qPCR.

Results

The level of hsa_circ_0020792 was remarkably increased in keloid patient-Exo and keloid fibroblasts compared with that in Healthy control-Exo and NFs, respectively. In addition, keloid patient-Exo obviously enhanced the viability, migration, and extracellular matrix (ECM) synthesis, but reduced the apoptosis of NFs. Moreover, keloid patient-Exo notably promoted the fibrogenesis of NFs, as characterized by enhanced TGF-β signaling, increased expressions of phosphorylated Smad2/3. However, downregulation of hsa_circ_0020792 markedly reversed the promoting effects of keloid patient-Exo on cell growth, migration, and myofibroblast activation and fibrogenesis. Furthermore, downregulation of hsa_circ_0020792 significantly reduced the viability, migration, and fibrogenesis in NFs, whereas these phenomena were reversed by miR-193a-5p inhibitor.

Conclusion

Collectively, keloid patient plasma-derived exosomal hsa_circ_0020792 could promote the proliferation, migration, and fibrogenesis of NFs via modulating miR-193a-5p and activating TGF-β1/Smad2/3 signaling.

Ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser improves quality of life in patients with extensive burn scars: A nested case-control study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser (CO₂ -AFL) for small-area burn scar management shows encouraging outcomes. Few studies, however, focused on comprehensive outcomes following CO₂ -AFL treatment for extensive burn scars. This study evaluated whether CO₂ -AFL surgery improved the quality of life (QoL) for burn survivors with extensive hypertrophic scars.

METHODS

A retrospective nested case-control study was initiated to analyze the efficacy of CO₂ -AFL treatment for patients with large-area burn scars. Patients with extensive burn scars (≥30% total body surface area [TBSA]) were registered in our hospital from March 2016 to October 2018. Patients undergoing CO₂ -AFL surgery were divided into CO₂ -AFL group, and patients undergoing conventional surgery were matched in a 1:1 ratio as the conventional surgery group according to the burned area. The questionnaires were collected and followed up. The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Burns Specific Health Scale-Brief (BSHS-B) were the primary parameters. Secondary parameters included the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), University of North Carolina "4P" Scars Scale (UNC4P), Patient Scars Assessment Scale for Patient (POSAS-P), and Douleur Neuropathique 4 questions (DN4).

RESULTS

23 patients (55.96 ± 21.59% TBSA) were included in CO₂ -AFL group and 23 patients (57.87 ± 18.21% TBSA) in conventional surgery group. Both the BSHS-B total score (CO₂ -AFL vs. conventional surgery: 115.35 ± 29.24 vs. 85.43 ± 33.19, p = 0.002) and the SF-36 total score (CO₂ -AFL vs. conventional surgery: 427.79 ± 118.27 vs. 265.65 ± 81.66, p < 0.001) for the CO₂ -AFL group were higher than those for the conventional surgery group. Parameters for the CO₂ -AFL group were lower than those for the conventional surgery group in all of the following comparisons: PSQI total score (CO₂ -AFL vs. conventional surgery: 7.70 ± 3.74 vs. 12.26 ± 4.61, p = 0.001), POSAS-P total score (CO₂ -AFL vs. conventional surgery: 26.48 ± 6.60 vs. 33.04 ± 4.56, p < 0.001), UNC4P total score (CO₂ -AFL vs. conventional surgery: 5.57 ± 1.97 vs. 7.26 ± 1.81, p = 0.004), and DN4 score (CO₂ -AFL vs. conventional surgery: 3 [2-5] vs. 5 [4-8], p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to conventional surgery, whole scar CO₂ -AFL surgery dramatically improved physical and mental health as well as QoL for people with extensive burn scars. Additionally, CO₂ -AFL enhanced the evaluation of scars including their appearance, pain, itching, and a host of other symptoms.