Nonsurgical reshaping of the nose, chin, and jawline: A retrospective analysis using experience-based eligibility criteria

Comparative Trial Evaluating a High- Versus Low-Integration Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Contouring the Jawline

BACKGROUND

Contour deficits of the jawline are an area of concern for many aesthetic patients. While the use of hyaluronic acid (HA) for jawline enhancement has been described previously, comparative investigations of HA fillers manufactured with different technologies are limited. Therefore, the aim of the current investigation was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Restylane Lyft (HA-L) and Restylane Defyne (HA-D) for contouring of the jawline.

METHODS

This prospective clinical trial enrolled forty (40) participants. Twenty (20) participants with thin skin were treated with HA-D, and twenty (20) participants with thick skin were treated with HA-L. Visits occurred at Screening/Baseline (treatment), Week 2 (touch-up), and Months 1, 3, and 6. At each visit, a blinded evaluator rated 3-dimensional participant imagery according to the Jawline Volume Loss Scale and participants completed the Jawline Subject Satisfaction Scale. Frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events was collected via participant diaries, and product integration characteristics were evaluated via ultrasound.

RESULTS

Chi-square tests of independence revealed statistically significant improvements in severities of jawline volume loss, which were maximal at Month 1 (100%) and maintained until Month 6 (82.05%). At Month 1, 92.10% of participants reported being satisfied with overall treatment effects. Adverse events were expected per the product monographs and did not vary per group. On ultrasound, HA-L displayed targeted product integration and HA-D displayed diffuse product integration.

CONCLUSIONS

Results support the use of HA-L and HA-D for the contouring of the jawline with each product capable of providing distinct advantages depending on patient attributes (e.g., skin thickness, underlying bone structure, desired outcomes).

LEVEL III

Evidence obtained from well-designed cohort or case-control analytic studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Structural Aesthetic Treatment With the Hyaluronic Acid Filler VYC-25L: Global Expert Considerations for Safe and Effective Long-Term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

VYC-25L is a robust, structural hyaluronic acid (HA) filler designed for facial volumizing, lifting, and contouring. It was first approved in 2019.

METHODS

A group of doctors with various specialties, who have used VYC-25L extensively since it first became available in their countries (3-5 years), share clinical experience and guidance on optimal use.

RESULTS

VYC-25L has a unique rheological and physicochemical profile that provides elevated lift capacity and enhanced projection, significant moldability immediately after injection, high levels of tissue integration, reversibility with hyaluronidase, and a long duration of clinical effects-typically lasting at least 24 months. The properties of VYC-25L have created new possibilities for nonsurgical facial medical aesthetics. However, as with any novel product, it is important that injectors recognize how best to use it for the benefit of patients. When first utilizing VYC-25L, it is advisable to start with the chin and jawline to gain familiarity with the gel characteristics before moving into other facial areas, and to consider splitting treatment over two or more sessions. Attention must also be given to injection volume, with less product typically required with VYC-25L compared to other fillers with similar indications. Key principles of good practice should be followed, including appropriate patient selection and pretreatment education, suitable choice of injection device and plane, aseptic technique, slow and careful administration method, and sufficient posttreatment follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

By adhering to these principles, VYC-25L can produce natural-looking and highly durable outcomes without substantial safety concerns.

Hyaluronic Acid Filler VYC-25L for Jawline Restoration Yields High Satisfaction, Improved Jawline Measurements, and Sustained Effectiveness Across Skin Types, Age, and Gender for up to 12 Months

BACKGROUND

A randomized study previously reported demonstration of the safety and efficacy of hyaluronic acid filler VYC-25L for restoring jawline definition.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs), objective changes in jawline profile, and safety and effectiveness measures by Fitzpatrick skin phototype (FST), gender, and age following VYC-25L treatment.

METHODS

Adults were randomized to receive VYC-25L (n = 157) or no treatment (control; n = 49) for 6 months. PROs were assessed by FACE-Q Satisfaction with Lower Face and Jawline, FACE-Q Appraisal of Lines: Marionette, and participant satisfaction with treatment questionnaires. Changes in jawline profile linear depth and volume were calculated with 3-dimensional digital image analysis. Responder rates, PROs, and injection site responses (ISRs) were assessed by FST, gender, and age.

RESULTS

At Month 6, >70% of treated participants responded "somewhat/very satisfied" to FACE-Q Satisfaction with Lower Face and Jawline questions, and ≥78% of treated participants responded "satisfied/definitely satisfied" with treatment overall. For participants treated for the marionette lines, the FACE-Q Appraisal of Lines: Marionette questionnaire mean score improved by 32.6 (baseline to Month 6). Mean change in linear depth in the prejowl sulcus in the treatment vs control groups was 4.6 mm vs 2.5 mm, respectively, and for jawline volume was 6.0 mL and -2.6 mL, respectively (baseline to Month 6). Subanalyses showed similar outcomes by FST, gender, and age, except for a numerically higher ISR incidence in females vs males.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with VYC-25L to improve jawline definition yielded high patient satisfaction, objective improvements in jawline profile, and comparable effectiveness across various demographics.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2

Profiloplasty and facial contouring with injectables: A holistic, practical, and user-friendly approach

BACKGROUND

Expansion of the aesthetic treatment armamentarium with novel injectable products has greatly improved our ability to reshape and enhance the facial profile. However, full-face "profiloplasty" with injectables remain a nascent concept and is insufficiently considered in daily practice. While techniques have been widely published for treating the individual facial areas that constitute an attractive profile-including the forehead, nose, lips, jawline, and chin-the literature remains fragmented on more universal methods for profile improvement.

AIMS

To collate disparate knowledge on profile optimization with injectables, and define a holistic, practical, and user-friendly approach to profiloplasty and facial contouring.

METHODS

Consideration is given to key anatomical aspects and the changes that occur with age; patient assessment parameters for planning profiloplasty; and the technical specifications, product selection, and essential safety considerations for minimizing the risk of complications and optimizing the effectiveness of treatment.

RESULTS

Relevant case studies are presented.

CONCLUSIONS

Holistic approaches of this type are essential if we are to maximize the potential of full-face treatment with injectables-both now and in the future.

Nonsurgical rhinoplasty using the hyaluronic acid filler VYC-25L: Safety and patient satisfaction in a retrospective analysis of 492 patients

BACKGROUND

Aesthetic treatment of the nose with hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers is increasingly popular but carries a small risk of major complications. Large patient cohorts are required to better understand this risk.

AIMS

To evaluate safety and patient satisfaction in a large series of nonsurgical rhinoplasty treatments with the HA filler, VYC-25L, in "real world" clinical practice.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of consecutive adult patients undergoing nonsurgical rhinoplasty with VYC-25L by a single injector between January 2020 and July 2022. All patients received initial treatment (typically ~0.3-0.5 mL of filler) and touch-up at 4-6 weeks (~0.1-0.3 mL). Safety data were collected throughout a mean follow-up of 11.1 months. Patient satisfaction was assessed using the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Nose and Satisfaction with Outcome questionnaires.

RESULTS

A total of 492 patients were included (984 treatment sessions including touch-ups). Of these, 467 (94.9%) were female and the mean age was 30.0 years. All treatments were associated with early transient edema; other adverse events included bruising (n = 123; 25%), residual asymmetry (n = 18; 3.7%), and suspected localized vascular occlusion (n = 3; 0.6%). The latter cases were easily resolved with hyaluronidase injection plus oral steroid and aspirin. No patients experienced infection, necrosis, blindness, lumps, granuloma, or delayed-onset nodules. Mean Rasch-transformed FACE-Q scores were 90.2% for Satisfaction with Nose and 99.2% for Satisfaction with Outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of patients treated in routine practice based on a systematic approach, nonsurgical rhinoplasty with VYC-25L was safe and effective.

Adverse Events Associated with Hyaluronic Acid Filler Injection for Non-surgical Facial Aesthetics: A Systematic Review of High Level of Evidence Studies

BACKGROUND

Hyaluronic acid (HA) dermal fillers are widely used in aesthetic medicine. While generally safe, potential complications can arise.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to identify and classify potential complications linked to the use of HA dermal fillers, as informed by high-quality, low-risk-of-bias studies.

METHODS

This review follows the Cochrane review standards for clinical systematic reviews. This systematic review analyzed 48 high level of evidence studies on the use of hyaluronic acid (HA) dermal fillers in non-surgical facial aesthetics and the adverse events that occurred.The inclusion criteria were randomized control studies on HA dermal fillers and their complications. Excluded were case reports, case series, observational studies, and other non-randomized research due to their inability to provide generalized conclusions and their inherent publication bias.

RESULTS

Adverse events were classified into three categories: expected reactions, product or technique-related adverse events, and severe adverse events. Most adverse events were short-lived injection site reactions, which resolved spontaneously. Specific HA fillers and injection techniques influenced the occurrence of adverse events, which generally resolved within weeks without treatment. Severe adverse events were rare, persisting for months and requiring active medical intervention.

DISCUSSION

This classification system can enhance understanding, prevention, and treatment of HA filler complications, and support patient education. The common complications were injection site reactions, with persistent symptoms treated with topical steroids, NSAIDs, or hyaluronidase. Severe complications included severe edema, angioedema and others, often necessitating specific treatments.

CONCLUSION

HA dermal fillers are generally safe and effective, with most adverse events being transient and mild to moderate in severity. Severe adverse events, although rare, do occur and are generally non-treatment related. Informed consent, patient education, and professional training are crucial for safe and successful outcomes. Level of Evidence II This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The Application and Efficacy of Hyaluronic Acid Fillers for Chin Enhancement and Retrusion Correction: A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcomes

A frequent facial abnormality called chin retrusion, also known as retrognathia, can be detrimental to a person's self-esteem and overall face aesthetics. Hyaluronic acid (HA) injections are one non-surgical approach to this problem that may provide individuals seeking chin augmentation with a relatively less invasive and potentially more affordable alternative. The present literature does not provide enough in-depth systematic reviews of the use of HA in chin augmentation. By completing a complete examination of the information that is currently available, this study intends to fill this knowledge gap, supporting physicians and researchers in better comprehending the efficacy and implications of HA in chin augmentation. The safety and success of any esthetic procedure should be made based on the results reported by the patients, including satisfaction and quality of life. Patients need to receive comprehensive surgical instructions from a medical professional to optimize the results of the HA injections for chin enhancement surgery. Regardless of the reported safety of using HA injections, some unwanted side effects have also been recorded. Indeed, healthcare professionals can make more informed decisions and give a patient comprehensive information about the procedure's risks and benefits to the patients. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. EMBASE, OVID, and Google Scholar databases were searched up to June 2023. We concentrated on adult patients treated with HA for chin enhancement, and our research was limited to studies conducted in English. A total of 2,738 patients from 24 articles were studied, with 2,259 receiving HA injections for chin augmentation. When applicable, aesthetic outcomes were assessed using scales such as the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)/FACE-Q and the Galderma Chin Retrusion Scale. Patient satisfaction increased noticeably. Among the studies, some reported complications following HA injection. While three studies found no significant negative effects, one highlighted a major necrotic complication. HA has proven to be an effective and safe alternative to chin augmentation surgery, with the majority of patients showing high satisfaction rates. However, large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to obtain meaningful results, which will contribute to the further development of non-surgical cosmetic procedures. These studies may facilitate further innovation and refinement of these techniques and potentially expand the application of HA fillers in facial aesthetics.