Anatomic evaluation of the normal variants of the arteries of face using color Doppler ultrasonography: Implications for facial aesthetic procedures

The Depth of the Facial Artery, Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The depth of the facial artery (FA) probably is the most crucial factor while performing aesthetic procedures. The course of FA varies on different levels. The knowledge of exact depth can help physicians to locate the FA more accurately, thereby enhancing the safety of filler injections. This research is the first meta-analysis focused on the quantitative comparison of depth on five different levels of facial artery including angular artery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twelve research papers were included in the meta-analysis. The analyses were performed in five distinctive places: (1) on the horizontal level of cheilion, (2) between oral commissure and nasal alae, (3) on the horizontal level of nasal alae, (4) between nasal alae and medial eye canthus and (5) on the horizontal level of medial eye canthus.

RESULTS

A total of 794, 514, 1095, 414 and 450 arteries were analyzed at the following horizontal levels, respectively: at the level of cheilion, between the nasal alae and oral commissure, at the level of nasal alae, between the nasal alae and medial eye canthus and at the level of medial eye canthus. The final results were as follows: 9.72, 95% CI (6.50-12.94) [mm], 10.34, 95% CI (5.24-15.44) [mm], 9.21, 95% CI (7.05-11.38) [mm], 4.68, 95% CI (4.04-5.31) [mm] and 2.38, 95% CI (1.38-3.38) [mm], respectively.

CONCLUSION

It appears that performing filler injections up to a depth of 4.5 mm, superficially to the facial artery, is considered safe at the level of the oral commissure. The depth between nasal alae and oral commissure varies significantly. A USG exam during the initial consultation prior to any aesthetic procedure might be a reasonable solution in the upper parts of the nasolabial fold.

NO LEVEL ASSIGNED

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Pedicled and Perforator Flaps from the Facial and the Superficial Temporal Vessels

This article illustrates the use of locoregional perforator and pedicled flaps from the 2 main vascular systems of the head and neck area. The 2 authors combine their experiences and research findings to highlight clinical scenarios for these useful refined reconstructions and discuss their pros and cons.

Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Facial Artery in the Nasolabial Fold for Gender Differences and Symmetry Between Hemifaces

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to establish the relationship of facial artery with nasolabial fold by color Doppler sonography and to determine facial artery variations and their relationship with age, gender, or hemifaces.

METHODS

The study included 188 patients (94 women, 94 men) aged 18-60 years. Overall, 376 facial arteries in both hemifaces were evaluated for the course within nasolabial fold, symmetry, and relationship with gender.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 39.29 ± 12.81 years. Type A (55.7%) was the most common type in both hemifaces. There was no significant relationship between the course of facial artery and age (P > .05). Asymmetrical course of facial artery was more common in females (54.3%). In both genders, type A was the type with highest symmetry detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Nasolabial fold is one of the important facial regions for filler injection. To prevent vascular injection, course of facial artery should be identified within the nasolabial fold. Type A was the most common type in both hemifaces and genders. Although the rates were close to each other, asymmetry in the course of the facial artery was observed in most of the patients. Ultrasonographic examination which is non-invasive and non-ionizing imaging method can be performed carefully before filler injection to determine vascular tissues.