Nursing students' perceptions of patient safety culture and barriers to reporting medication errors: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Patient safety is critical to high-quality patient care. However, it is liable to medication errors (MEs).

OBJECTIVE

Therefore, this study assessed perceptions of patient safety culture (PSC) and barriers to reporting MEs among nursing students in Hail City, Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

The researchers conducted a cross-sectional study among 360 convenience students at the College of Nursing, University of Hail, in 2023. We collected data using questions about the characteristics of students, the Health Professional Education in Patient Safety Survey (H-PEPSS) questionnaire, and the Medication Error Reporting questionnaire. Students' mean PSC perception scores were calculated and compared based on their characteristics using the independent-samples t-test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used as appropriate. We used Paired samples t-test to compare the mean scores of self-reported perceptions of PSC between classroom and clinical settings, with a significance level of <0.05.

RESULTS

The overall PSC perception score was significantly higher in the classroom than in the clinical setting (p = 0.017). Students in the classroom setting scored significantly higher on the domains of "clinical safety skills" (p < 0.001), "effective communication" (p = 0.039), and "safety risk management" (p = 0.008) than those in the clinical setting. Conversely, students in the clinical setting scored significantly higher on the domains of "teamwork with other HCPs" (p < 0.001), "understanding human and environmental factors" (p = 0.039), and "recognizing and responding to immediate hazards" (p < 0.001). Female students and those who were in their second level, had PSC training, desired to participate in PSC training, and reported the presence of an error reporting system scored significantly higher on PSC perceptions in both settings. Most students (95.8 %) believed in the benefits of discovering and reporting MEs. However, a considerable proportion also expressed concerns about ME reporting, including fears of disciplinary action (87.5 %), blame for errors (87.2 %), and loss of respect from colleagues (85.6 %). Most students (97.5 %) also believed that MEs should be reported. However, only 11.1 % of students reported the occurrence of MEs, and 6.7 % experienced these errors.

CONCLUSION

Discrepancies exist in PSC perceptions among nursing students in Hail City between academic and real-world contexts, being consistently higher in the classroom compared to the clinical setting. PSC training and the presence of an error reporting system should be considered when developing interventions to improve PSC perceptions. This study revealed that many barriers were rated in a high percentages for reporting the medication, particularly fears of disciplinary action, blame for errors and loss of respect from colleagues, should be addressed.

Intravenous Line Labels For High-Alert Drugs Administered To Critically Ill Patients: A Simulated Experimental Assessment

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the effect of IV line labels on nurses' identification of high-alert medications in a simulated scenario of multiple infusions for critically ill patients.

DESIGN

Randomised crossover simulation experimental study.

METHODS

A study was conducted on 29 nurses working in intensive care for over 6 months. They were given two critical scenarios in a simulated environment, one with labels and the other without labels, involving multiple intravenous infusions. The nurses had to identify the medications infused into the critical patients' intravenous lines and disconnect a specific line. The data were collected and analysed to evaluate the errors made by the nurses in identifying and disconnecting the medications and the time they spent carrying out the tasks. The Wilcoxon test was used to analyse the variation in outcome before and after the intervention.

RESULTS

Approximately one-third of the study participants incorrectly identified the intravenous lines in both scenarios. There was no significant difference in the average number of errors between the scenarios with and without labels. However, the time taken to perform the tasks in the scenario with labels was 1 min less than in the scenario without labels, suggesting a potential efficiency gain.

CONCLUSIONS

The labels on the intravenous lines allowed for quick drug identification and disconnection. The professionals performed similarly in correctly recognising the high-alert medication intravenous lines, in the scenarios with or without labels.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The label can be used as a technology to prevent misidentification of high-alert medications administered to critically ill patients through intravenous lines, thereby enhancing medication safety in healthcare institutions. No Public Contribution.

Association of external interruptions with increased medication administration duration and self-interruptions: A direct observational study: Empirical research quantitative

AIMS

To examine task duration and frequency of self-interruptions among study participants during externally interrupted compared with externally uninterrupted simulated medication administration.

BACKGROUND

Interruptions are prevalent during nursing medication administration and can lead to inefficient, delayed, omitted and unsafe patient care. Interrupted nursing tasks are shown to take longer to complete compared to uninterrupted tasks; however, studies seldom indicate if the time spent in the interruption was included or excluded in the reported task duration. It is unknown if the time spent in the interruption leads to longer task completion times or if other factors, such as the time needed to re-engage in the primary task and/or self-interruptions, are involved. Little is known about associations between external interruptions and self-interruptions during nursing tasks. Self-interruptions are caused by an individual's own decision to stop an activity to attend to something else.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional within-subjects design.

METHODS

This two-site study investigated task duration and frequencies of self-interruptions during externally interrupted and externally uninterrupted simulated medication administration. Data on medication administration duration, external interruption duration and self-interruptions were collected via direct observation from November 2019-February 2020. The time spent in the external interruption was deducted from the medication administration duration.

RESULTS

Thirty-five participants were included in the study. The externally interrupted task had a significantly longer duration and significantly more frequent self-interruptions within-subjects compared to the externally uninterrupted task. Self-interruptions were most often due to forgotten supplies.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that the time needed to re-engage with an externally interrupted task and/or self-interruptions may lead to longer task completion times.

IMPACT

Researchers are encouraged to investigate mediators of interruptions that lead to longer task completion times and errors. Findings can be used to develop and implement interruption management strategies that aim to improve the safety and quality of patient care.

REPORTING METHOD

Equator guidelines were followed using the STROBE reporting method.

PATIENT/PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public involvement in this study.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE

Educators and researchers can use the study findings to guide teaching methods and direct future studies. By gaining a better understanding of the mediators of interruptions that create longer task completion times and increase the risk for errors, tailored interruption management strategies that aim to improve the safety and quality of healthcare can be developed and implemented.

Improving care safety by characterizing task interruptions during interactions between healthcare professionals: an observational study

Few studies have investigated interruptions to the work of professionals practicing in inpatient hospitals, and even fewer take account of the functions that make up the system. Safety of care can be improved by considering avoidable interruptions during interactions between managerial and care delivery functions. The present study describes the characteristics of interruptions to the work of professionals working in the inpatient hospital sector, with respect to their typology, frequency, duration, and avoidability in the context of interactions between functions. This direct observational study of interruptions in hospital care was performed in the Pays de la Loire (west coast) area of France. A total of 23 teams (17 institutions) working in medical or surgical specialties (excluding intensive care) were included. Observations were performed between May and September 2019, and lasted seven consecutive hours per team. A pair of observers simultaneously observed the same professional for ∼30 min. Each occupational category was examined. Reported characteristics were: (i) the method and duration of the request, (ii) the location of interrupted and interrupting persons, (iii) the reaction of the interrupted person, (iv) the characteristics of the interrupting person, and (v) the classification of interrupted and interrupting tasks according to their function. An avoidable interruption was defined. Interruptions during interactions between professionals were categorised in terms of their function and avoidability. Descriptive statistical analyses (mean, standard deviation, and distribution) were run. In particular, cross-comparisons were run to highlight avoidability interruptions and interactions between managerial and care delivery functions during the working day, for different professional categories, and for the location of the request. Overall, 286 interrupted professionals were observed and 1929 interruptions were characterised. The majority of interruptions were due to a face-to-face request (58.7%), lasting ≤30 s (72.5%). Professionals engaged in the response in 49.3% of cases. A total of 57.4% of interruptions were avoidable. The average number of interruptions was 10.5 (SD = 3.2) per hour per professional. An analysis of avoidability and interactions between managerial and care delivery functions found that the period between 12:00 and 13:00 was the riskiest in terms of care safety. This study highlighted the characteristics of interruptions to the activity of professionals working in inpatient hospitals. Care teams could focus on making medical and nursing professionals much more aware of the importance of interruptions, and each team could decide how to best-manage interruptions, in the context of their specific working environment.

Educational interventions to reduce nurse medication interruptions: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Preventable harm from medicines is a global problem creating huge economic and social burden. Interruptions occur frequently in clinical environments causing medication episodes to take longer and having a cognitive cost on the nurse.

AIM

The aim of this scoping review is to identify and evaluate educational interventions that have been employed to reduce medication interruptions and improve medication safety.

METHODS

Six databases were searched for the scoping review (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Pishin and Medline) along with reference lists and grey literature searches. Articles were included if they were written in English, published between 2010 and 2020 and employed an education intervention (including bundled interventions). Databases were searched using keywords and Boolean operators.

RESULTS

Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Seven of these studies were conducted in hospital (adults n = 6, paediatric n = 1) and one study in a university with undergraduate nurses. Four studies used a combined intervention and four exclusively employed an education intervention. Five studies found a significant decrease in the number of interruptions post intervention, but one of the studies that exclusively employed an education intervention found no significant difference. Changes in the nurses' behaviour post intervention were also cited in two studies.

IMPLICATIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH

There was a lack of exclusive education interventions, making it difficult to determine the effectiveness of education at reducing medication interruptions. This review highlights the necessity of some interruptions when performing tasks, for example, to make a nurse aware of a deteriorating patient. However, as the majority of studies used the number of interruptions to determine the effectiveness of the intervention, there is uncertainty as to whether this is the right outcome measure to use. In the future, a focus on outcome measures reflecting change in nurse behaviour may be more effective in determining the strength of an educational intervention.

Nurse-to-nurse handoff with distractors and interruptions: An integrative review

AIM

An integrative review of the literature was conducted to explore perceptions of distractors and interruptions during nurse-to-nurse handoff.

BACKGROUND

Handoff distractors and interruptions are recognized as barriers to effective nurse handoff and may lead to preventable and costly medical errors. However, little is known about the perception of these barriers to nurses and strategies to mitigate distractors and interruptions during nurse-to-nurse handoff.

METHODS

Using the framework of Whittemore and Knafl, four electronic databases were searched for articles written in English and published in the last five years. Inclusion criteria included: qualitative, quantitative, mixed-methods or quality improvement papers focused on distractors/interruptions during nurse handoff. A multi-author independent review of articles was completed with a rigorous process of data extraction and quality assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 17 articles were reviewed with findings categorized into the following themes: perceptions of handoff, characteristics of handoff, or logistics of handoff. Nurses reported that interruptions and distractions were a limitation in handoff quality and handoff efficiency, occurring during inter-shift and unit-to-unit handoff. The two most common types of interruptions and distractions were people (patient, family) and environmental factors (equipment alarms). An organized and standardized approach to handoff was recommended, but few specific examples were reported.

CONCLUSION

Despite recent research related to interruptions and distractions in nurse handoff, few evidence-based strategies have been identified that effectively mitigate these patient safety problems. More evidence is needed to determine best practice methods for handoff training for nurses and nursing students.

Interventions to reduce the incidence of medical error and its financial burden in health care systems: A systematic review of systematic reviews

Background and aim

Improving health care quality and ensuring patient safety is impossible without addressing medical errors that adversely affect patient outcomes. Therefore, it is essential to correctly estimate the incidence rates and implement the most appropriate solutions to control and reduce medical errors. We identified such interventions.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review of systematic reviews by searching four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Ovid Medline, and Embase) until January 2021 to elicit interventions that have the potential to decrease medical errors. Two reviewers independently conducted data extraction and analyses.

Results

Seventysix systematic review papers were included in the study. We identified eight types of interventions based on medical error type classification: overall medical error, medication error, diagnostic error, patients fall, healthcare-associated infections, transfusion and testing errors, surgical error, and patient suicide. Most studies focused on medication error (66%) and were conducted in hospital settings (74%).

Conclusions

Despite a plethora of suggested interventions, patient safety has not significantly improved. Therefore, policymakers need to focus more on the implementation considerations of selected interventions.

Nursing students' risk perceptions related to medication administration error: A qualitative study

AIM

The purpose of this study was to explore and describe pre-licensure nursing students' perceptions of risk for medication administration errors in fourth-year baccalaureate student nurses from three campuses at a large central Pennsylvania university.

BACKGROUND

Medication administration errors continue to be a significant safety concern in healthcare settings. Pre-licensure nursing education is a critical time period during which to have an impact on future medication administration practices. Perception of risk influences decision making and behavior, including nursing clinical decision making.

DESIGN

This descriptive, exploratory study involved a qualitative design.

METHODS

A thematic analysis of the qualitative data resulting from 60 individual, in-depth semi-structured interviews was conducted.

RESULTS

The participants offered rich, detailed narratives which revealed the following themes: (1) the nature of risk perceptions, (2) more opportunities to learn, (3) experiences with medication administration error, and (4) intrinsic characteristics influence errors.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings provide a broad description of the nature of student nurse risk perceptions for future medication administration errors. Recommendations for nursing education practice and pedagogy include additional clinical experiences, modified pharmacology curricula and instruction, and expanded simulations involving medication administration error.

Work interruptions and missed nursing care: A necessary evil or an opportunity? The role of nurses' sense of controllability

AIM

To explore nurses' experiences with work interruptions (WIs) through the lens of missed nursing care (MNC).

DESIGN

A qualitative descriptive design.

METHODS

Eleven small focus groups involving 34 nurses (three nurses per group on average) from acute-care hospital wards were conducted. Nurses shared their experiences with WIs (sources, reactions and decisions) from the MNC perspective. Data analysis was conducted via content analysis.

RESULTS

A preponderant theme emerged-the dynamic of controllability. Nurses who perceived a sense of controllability felt that they could decide whether to accept or reject the WI, regardless of WI type, and emotions of anger emerged. Conversely, nurses who did not perceive sense of controllability attended the secondary task: MNC occurred, and distress emotions emerged. Results emphasized that nurses are active agents prioritizing whether to omit or complete care in the face of WIs. Controllability, accompanied by active negative emotions, perpetuate a prioritization process that makes it less probable that MNC occurs.

Interruption in the work of nursing professionals: conceptual analysis

OBJECTIVES

to analyze the concept of "interruption in the work of nursing professionals".

METHODS

conceptual study according to the method proposed by Walker and Avant through integrative literature review. The study searched the databases using the descriptors: "Attention", "Attention Bias", "Health Personnel", "Nurses", "Patient Safety" and "Medical Malpractices". The sample consisted of 36 studies.

RESULTS

the antecedents were alarms, answering phone calls, providing patient care, and lack of material/medicine. The defining attributes were pause, suspension, breakage, and intrusion. In relation to the consequences, the study highlighted the increase in frequency and severity of medication errors and change of focus.

FINAL CONSIDERATIONS

theconceptual analysis identified the attributes, antecedents, and consequences and allowed to build an operational definition for "interruption in the work of nursing professionals". It will contribute to the improvement of the work process and the creation of strategies that ensure safer care for the patient.

Working in a minefield; Nurses' strategies for handling medicine administration interruptions in hospitals, -a qualtiative interview study

BACKGROUND

Administering medicines is one of the most high-risk tasks in health care. However, nurses are frequently interrupted during medicine administration, which jeopardises patient safety. Few studies have examined nurses' experiences and the strategies they adopt to cope with interruptions during medicine rounds. This paper identifies nurses' strategies for handling and reducing interruptions and ensuring safety during medicine rounds, within the confines of the hospitals' organisational systems.

METHODS

This descriptive and exploratory research study was undertaken with experienced nurses in Norwegian hospitals in 2015 using semi-structured interviews. Interviews were designed to elicit experiences and strategies used for handling interruptions to medicine rounds. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis based on inductive reasoning to identify meaningful subjects and reach an interpretive level of understanding regarding nurses' experiences.

RESULTS

All 19 senior nurses who were approached were interviewed. From 644 condensed meaning units, we identified eight interpretative units and three themes: 'working in environments of interruptions', 'personal coping strategies', and 'management-related strategies'. Nurses' working environments were characterised by interruptions and distractions, which often threatened patient safety. To handle this unpredictability and maintain ward organisation, nurses developed their own personal strategies to overcome inherent problems with their working conditions, the absence of effective management, and colleagues' reluctance to assume responsibility for minimising interruptions.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of medicines in hospitals can be described as 'working in a minefield'. Our findings indicate that the hospital management, in cooperation with nurses and other healthcare professionals, should take responsibility for improving the routine process of medicine administration by minimising avoidable interruptions. Patient safety can be improved when the hospital management takes steps to protect nurses' work environments and assumes responsibility for resolving these challenges.

Undergraduate Nursing Students and Management of Interruptions: Preparation of Students for Future Workplace Realities

AIM

The aim of this study was to investigate interruption management strategies and associative cues used by nursing students when interrupted during simulated medication administration.

BACKGROUND

Interruptions occur with high frequency in health care settings and are associated with increased medication errors and decreased task efficiency. The Altmann and Trafton memory for goals model, a cognitive-science model, proposes use of associative cues during an interruption to mitigate these negative effects.

METHOD

A mixed-methods, two-site study explored associative cues and other management strategies that nursing students used when interrupted during simulated medication administration. Data were collected via direct observation and semistructured interviews.

RESULTS

Students primarily multitasked (66.7 percent) during the interruption. Few students (5.5 percent) used associative cues. Students voiced the need for education and practice on how to manage interruptions.

CONCLUSION

Evidence-based strategies are required to prepare nursing students for workplace interruptions. Use of associative cues during interruptions warrants further investigation.

Healthcare personnel's working conditions in relation to risk behaviours for organism transmission: A mixed-methods study

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To investigate healthcare personnel's working conditions in relation to risk behaviours for organism transmission.

BACKGROUND

Healthcare personnel's behaviour is often influenced by working conditions that in turn can impact the development of healthcare-associated infections. Observational studies are scarce, and further understanding of working conditions in relation to behaviour is essential for the benefit of the healthcare personnel and the safety of the patients.

DESIGN

A mixed-methods convergent design.

METHODS

Data were collected during 104 h of observation at eight hospital units. All 79 observed healthcare personnel were interviewed. Structured interviews covering aspects of working conditions were performed with the respective first-line manager. The qualitative and quantitative data were collected concurrently and given equal priority. Data were analysed separately and then merged. The study follows the GRAMMS guidelines for reporting mixed-methods research.

RESULTS

Regardless of measurable and perceived working conditions, risk behaviours frequently occurred especially missed hand disinfection. Healthcare personnel described staffing levels, patient-level workload, physical factors and interruptions as important conditions that influence infection prevention behaviours. The statistical analyses confirmed that interruptions increase the frequency of risk behaviours. Significantly higher frequencies of risk behaviours also occurred in activities where healthcare personnel worked together, which in the interviews was described as a consequence of caring for high-need patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These mixed-methods findings illustrate that healthcare personnel's perceptions do not always correspond to the observed results since risk behaviours frequently occurred regardless of the observed and perceived working conditions. Facilitating the possibility for healthcare personnel to work undisturbed when needed is essential for their benefit and for patient safety.

RELEVANCE FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

The results can be used to enlighten healthcare personnel and managers and when designing future infection prevention work.

Nurses' Perceived Causes of Medication Administration Errors: A Qualitative Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Medication administration errors (MAEs) are a critical patient safety issue. Nurses are often responsible for administering medication to patients, thus their perceptions of causes of errors can provide valuable guidance for the development of interventions aimed to mitigate errors. Quantitative research can overlook less overt causes; therefore, a qualitative systematic review was conducted to present a synthesis of qualitative evidence of nurses' perceived causes of MAEs.

METHODS

Publications from 2000 to February 2019 were searched using four electronic databases. Inclusion criteria were articles that (1) presented results from studies that used a qualitative or mixed methods design, (2) reported qualitative data on nurses' perceived causes of MAEs in health care settings, and (3) were published in the English language. Sixteen individual articles satisfied the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality of each article was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool. Thematic analysis of the data was performed. Perceived causes of errors were labeled as knowledge-based, personal, and contextual factors.

RESULTS

The primary knowledge-based factor was lack of medication knowledge. Personal factors included fatigue and complacency. Contextual factors included heavy workloads and interruptions. Contextual factors were reported in all the studies reviewed and were often interconnected with personal and knowledge-based factors.

CONCLUSION

Causes of MAEs are perceived by nurses to be multifactorial and interconnected and often stem from systems issues. Multifactorial interventions aimed at mitigating medication errors are required with an emphasis on systems changes. Findings in this review can be used to guide efforts aimed at identifying and modifying factors contributing to MAEs.

Interruptions in Health Care: Assessing Their Connection With Error and Patient Harm

OBJECTIVE

We address the problem of how researchers investigate the actual or potential causal connection between interruptions and medical errors, and whether interventions might reduce the potential for harm.

BACKGROUND

It is widely assumed that interruptions lead to errors and patient harm. However, many reviewers and authors have commented that there is not strong evidence for a causal connection.

METHOD

We introduce a framework of criteria for assessing how strongly evidence implies causality: the so-called Bradford Hill criteria. We then examine four key "metanarratives" of research into interruptions in health care-applied cognitive psychology, epidemiology, quality improvement, and cognitive systems engineering-and assess how each tradition has addressed the causal connection between interruptions and error.

RESULTS

Outcomes of applying the Bradford Hill criteria are that the applied cognitive psychology and epidemiology metanarratives address the causal connection relatively directly, whereas the quality improvement metanarrative merely assumes causality, and the cognitive systems engineering metanarrative either implicitly or explicitly questions the feasibility of finding a direct causal connection with harm.

CONCLUSION

The Bradford Hill criteria are useful for evaluating the existing literature on the relationship between interruptions in health care, clinical errors, and the potential for patient harm. In the future, more attention is needed to the issue of why interruptions usually do not lead to harm, and the implications for how we approach patient safety.

Interruptions experienced by nurses during pediatric medication administration in China: An observational study

PURPOSE

The objectives of this study were to describe (a) the frequency of interruptions experienced by a pediatric nurse per hour, (b) the sources of interruptions experienced by a pediatric nurse, and (c) the interruption outcomes during pediatric medication administration.

DESIGN AND METHODS

This design of this study was a cross-sectional observational study. A convenience sample of pediatric nurses was used in this study. The interruption observation sheet was used to collect data about the frequency, sources, and outcomes of interruptions.

RESULTS

There was a total of 43 nurses were observed in more than 180 medication administration rounds. An interruption rate of 94.51% occurred during pediatric medication administration. The frequency of interruptions was three or more times (51.04%). The most common source of interruption was attributed to the working environment (32.37%). The second most frequent reason for interruption came from personnel, such as caregivers (24.48%), followed by physicians (10.79%), and other nursing staff (9.54%). The third most common source of interruption was communication issues, including patient interviews, patient reports, and case discussion (8.71%). Six errors (2.49%) were reported out of 241 interruptions as a result of interruptions. In specific, causes of errors during pediatric medication administration were due to wrong medication dose.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

This study provides important information on interruptions experienced by pediatric nurses during medication administration in Chinese hospital settings and found that interruptions frequently occur in pediatric units.

Pharmacist-led, video-stimulated feedback to reduce prescribing errors in doctors-in-training: A mixed methods evaluation

Aims

To develop and evaluate a feasible, authentic pharmacist‐led prescribing feedback intervention for doctors‐in‐training, to reduce prescribing errors.

Methods

This was a mixed methods study. Sixteen postgraduate doctors‐in training, rotating though the surgical assessment unit of 1 UK hospital, were filmed taking a medication history with a patient and prescribing medications. Each doctor reviewed their video footage and made plans to improve their prescribing, supported by feedback from a pharmacist. Quantitative data in the form of prescribing error prevalence data were collected on 1 day per week before, during and after the intervention period (between November 2015 and March 2017). Qualitative data in the form of individual semi‐structured interviews were collected with a subset of participants, to evaluate their experience. Quantitative data were analysed using a statistical process chart and qualitative data were transcribed and analysed thematically.

Results

During the data collection period, 923 patient drug charts were reviewed by pharmacists who identified 1219 prescribing errors overall. Implementation of this feedback approach was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the mean number of prescribing errors, from 19.0/d to 11.7/d (estimated to equate to 38% reduction; P < .0001). Pharmacist‐led video‐stimulated prescribing feedback was feasible and positively received by participants, who appreciated the reinforcement of good practice as well as the opportunity to reflect on and improve practice.

Conclusions

Feedback to doctors‐in‐training tends to be infrequent and often negative, but this feasible feedback strategy significantly reduced prescribing errors and was well received by the target audience as a supportive developmental approach.

Interrupções no trabalho da enfermagem como fator de risco para erros de medicação

Objetivo: verificar a associação entre as interrupções e os erros de medicação nas doses preparadas e administradas por profissionais de enfermagem das unidades de internação de clínica médica de dois hospitais públicos localizados no Distrito Federal, Brasil. Método: estudo exploratório, de delineamento transversal e caráter quantitativo realizado em dois hospitais públicos no Distrito Federal, Brasil. A amostra foi de conveniência, sendo 8 profissionais do Hospital 1 e 18 profissionais do Hospital 2. Os dados foram coletados a partir de observação direta e aplicação de questionário e instrumento para identificação dos fatores de risco para erros de medicação. Foram considerados significativos os resultados com valores de p < 0,05 e o índice de confiança estabelecido foi de 95 %.Resultados: em ambos os hospitais verificou-se um perfil majoritariamente de técnicos de enfermagem (H1 = 100 %; H2 = 94,4 %), do sexo feminino (H1 = 75,0 %; H2 = 88,1 %), com idade superior aos 30 anos (H1 = 75,0 %; H2 = 61,0 %). Foram observadas 899 doses no Hospital 1 e Hospital 2, que resultaram em 921 e 648 erros respectivamente, dos quais 464 (53,6 %) no Hospital 1 e 118 (24,4 %) no Hospital 2 estiveram diretamente relacionados à presença de interrupções no trabalho. Cada dose observada sofreu aproximadamente 1,7 erro e percebeu-se uma frequência de aproximadamente 26 (H1) e 16,2 (H2) erros por hora. Conclusões: verifica-se uma forte associação entre as interrupções no trabalho da equipe de enfermagem e os erros de medicação nas unidades de internação estudadas, caracterizando as interrupções como importante fator de risco.