Surgical and Medical Management of Isolated Tricuspid Valve Infective Endocarditis in Intravenous Drug Users

A Single-Centre Experience of the Management of Infective Endocarditis

BACKGROUND

Treatment for infective endocarditis (IE) is usually medical, with surgery reserved for those failing medical management or developing complications. Currently, 25%-50% of patients undergo surgery for IE with a 70%-80% immediate survival rate. However, there is controversy over the timing of surgery following cerebrovascular events, which occur in 15%-30% of IE patients. This study aimed to investigate whether surgical management is superior to medical management in patients with IE and to determine the optimal timing for surgery following the development of neurological symptoms.

METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively between 2012 and 2018 from 436 patients diagnosed with IE and treated at our tertiary teaching hospital. The authors analysed the type of treatment, the timing of surgery, and the outcomes of these including mortality, IE recurrence, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

A total of 421 patients were included in the analysis. More than two-thirds (69.1%) of patients underwent surgical intervention. The survival rate of patients having surgery for IE was 77.2%, compared to 50.7% in patients who did not undergo surgical intervention. 6.8% of patients presented with neurological symptoms; 73.3% of these patients had surgery within 14 days with a 90.9% survival.

CONCLUSION

This study finds surgery to be safe with a seemingly higher survival rate compared to medical management alone, although this may be confounded by patients in the medical group being less likely to have surgery. Surgery in patients presenting with neurological symptoms is safe within 2 weeks from presentation with excellent outcomes.

Management of Patients With Tricuspid Valve Endocarditis and Ongoing Intravenous Drug Abuse

Right-sided infective endocarditis in patients with intravenous drug abuse portends a worse prognosis. Data on optimal management strategy in this situation are scarce. We describe outcomes of 2 different treatment strategies, including a patient treated conservatively with favorable intermediate-term results and another who was treated surgically and developed recurrent endocarditis. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

The Epidemiology of Infective Endocarditis in New South Wales, Australia: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study From 2001 to 2020

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the demographic differences amongst patients diagnosed with infective endocarditis (IE), predictors of adverse events, and the association between clinical decision-making and adverse health outcomes amongst patients with IE.

DESIGN

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using the New South Wales (NSW) Admitted Patient Data Collection (APDC) from the Centre for Health Record Linkage (CHeReL).

PARTICIPANTS

All patients (N=18,044) from 2001 to 2020 in New South Wales who received a diagnosis of IE using ICD-10-AM diagnostic code 133.0 were included.

METHODS

Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, while the t-test was used for continuous variables. The association between clinical decision-making and adverse health outcomes amongst patients with IE were examined via generalised linear mixed models.

RESULTS

Sex, age, birthplace and referral impacted clinical decision-making, in-hospital death and severity of the disease. Women experienced a higher risk of death and fewer escalations of care. Admission and mortality increased with age, with those aged 60 and above responsible for 60.8% of hospitalisations. Despite octogenarians making up one-fifth of admissions and having the worst mortality rate (15.1%), they experienced only one in 10 intensive care (ICU) admissions. Overseas-born patients had fewer escalations of care and experienced less severe disease if referred by a medical practitioner. One out of 10 admissions that resulted in a hospital death were given non-emergency status, and one in two ICU patients died in hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

Sex, age, place of birth, and clinical decision-making were important predictors of severe disease and death in hospital, lending weight that health care clinical decisions may adversely impact health outcomes for populations of interest.

Isolated Tricuspid Valve Replacement for Infective Endocarditis

BACKGROUND

Existing data regarding isolated tricuspid valve replacement for primary tricuspid valve disease such as infective endocarditis (IE) are limited. The aim of this study was to review our experience of isolated tricuspid valve replacement for IE.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed to evaluate the perioperative and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing isolated tricuspid valve replacement for IE at our tertiary referral center between January 2000 and December 2014. Surgical outcomes were reviewed to include survival and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Seven patients underwent isolated tricuspid valve replacement for IE during the study period. Mean age was 41 ± 14 years with six (86%) males. Six patients (86%) were intravenous drug users. Five patients (71%) presented with septic emboli to the lungs. Five patients (71%) had active endocarditis at the time of surgery. The indications for surgery were heart failure in three patients (43%), persistent sepsis in three patients (43%) and both in one patient (14%). Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus was the most common infective organism, isolated in five patients (71%). There were no in-hospital mortalities or permanent pacemaker implantations. Follow-up was completed in 86% of the cases. The median follow-up period was 13 months (range 2 to 129 months). Three patients (43%) died during the follow-up period, at 7 months, 8 months and 13 months, respectively. All deaths were associated with prosthetic valve IE and recurrent intravenous drug use.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supplements the paucity of data pertaining to tricuspid valve replacement for IE in the local population. Survival outcomes can be improved with prompt surgical intervention, optimal medical optimization, and a holistic, psychosocial approach targeting intravenous drug abuse.

Health programmes and services addressing the prevention and management of infectious diseases in people who inject drugs in Canada: a systematic integrative review

OBJECTIVES

People who inject drugs (PWID) experience a high burden of injection drug use-related infectious disease and challenges in accessing adequate care. This study sought to identify programmes and services in Canada addressing the prevention and management of infectious disease in PWID.

DESIGN

This study employed a systematic integrative review methodology. Electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL and Web of Science Core Collection) and relevant websites were searched for literature published between 2008 and 2019 (last search date was 6 June 2019). Eligible articles and documents were required to address injection or intravenous drug use and health programmes or services relating to the prevention or management of infectious diseases in Canada.

RESULTS

This study identified 1607 unique articles and 97 were included in this study. The health programmes and services identified included testing and management of HIV and hepatitis C virus (n=27), supervised injection facilities (n=19), medication treatment for opioid use disorder (n=12), integrated infectious disease and addiction programmes (n=10), needle exchange programmes (n=9), harm reduction strategies broadly (n=6), mobile care initiatives (n=5), peer-delivered services (n=3), management of IDU-related bacterial infections (n=2) and others (n=4). Key implications for policy, practice and future research were identified based on the results of the included studies, which include addressing individual and systemic factors that impede care, furthering evaluation of programmes and the need to provide comprehensive care to PWID, involving medical care, social support and harm reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate the need for expanded services across a variety of settings and populations. Our study emphasises the importance of addressing social and structural factors that impede infectious disease care for PWID. Further research is needed to improve evaluation of health programmes and services and contextual factors surrounding accessing services or returning to care.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020142947.

Clinical outcomes of percutaneous debulking of tricuspid valve endocarditis in intravenous drug users

OBJECTIVES

A retrospective case series of a percutaneous approach to debulk tricuspid valve endocarditis (TVE) using an 8 French mechanical aspiration system in patients with a history of intravenous drug use (IVDU) was reported. IVDU associated TVE is increasing in the United States and is associated with high mortality despite early surgical debridement. Patients with advanced disease, shock, and respiratory failure may not be candidates for surgical debridement or replacement. These patients have recurrent events despite medical therapy METHODS: About 25 patients with IVDU associated TVE with persistent bacteremia confirmed by repeat blood cultures after 72 hr of sensitivity directed antibiotics and presence of pulmonary emboli confirmed by computed tomographic (CT) scan, who had undergone percutaneous aspiration were included. Patients were all deemed high risk for surgical debridement by a CT surgeon and evaluated by an infectious disease consultant. Procedures were performed under moderate sedation with intracardiac echo and a steerable guide with a CAT8 Penumbra aspiration catheter.

RESULTS

There were no intraprocedural deaths or complications. About 36% had septic shock on presentation. Survival of index hospitalization was 88%. Repeat blood cultures showed no growth on all surviving patients. Readmission rate was 4% (n = 1) at 1 month. About 40% (n = 2) patients with septic shock survived at 1 month compared with 100% survival (n = 20) in those without shock. Presence of septic shock was associated with reduced survival at 1 month (p < .01).

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous mechanical aspiration with an 8 Fr system is a feasible, minimally invasive alternative to surgical debulking. Mortality remains high in those presenting with septic shock. Further studies are needed to evaluate long-term outcomes.

Long-term Outcomes Are Poor in Intravenous Drug Users Following Infective Endocarditis, Even After Surgery

BACKGROUND

Previous studies of outcomes in people who inject drugs (PWID) with infective endocarditis (IE) have often been retrospective, have had small sample sizes, and the duration of follow-up has been short and limited to patients who were operated on.

METHODS

PWID treated for IE between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2016 were identified from a prospectively collected database. PWID hospitalized with other infections acted as a novel comparison group. Outcomes were all-cause mortality, cause of death, relapse, recurrence, and reoperation.

RESULTS

There were 105 episodes of IE in 92 PWID and 112 episodes of other infections in 107 PWID in whom IE was suspected but rejected. Survival at 30 days for the IE group was 85%, and 30-day survival following surgery was 96%. The most common pathogens were Staphylococcus species (60%) and Streptococcus species (30%). The surgical intervention rate was 47%. Survival for the IE group at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years was 74%, 63%, 58%, and 44%, respectively. This was significantly lower compared with the comparator group of other infections in PWID (P = .0002). Mortality was higher in patients who required surgery compared with those who did not (hazard ratio, 1.8 [95% confidence interval, .95-3.3]). The commonest cause of death was infection (66%), usually a further episode of IE (55%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although early survival was good, long-term life expectancy was low. This was attributable to ongoing infection risk, rather than other factors known to affect prognosis in PWID. Surgery conferred no long-term survival advantage. More efforts are needed to reduce reinfection risk following an episode of IE in PWID.While early survival for people who inject drugs (PWID) with infective endocarditis is good, long-term survival is poor due to ongoing infection risk. Surgery conferred no long-term survival advantage, so more efforts are needed to reduce reinfection risks for PWID.

Injection Drug Use Endocarditis: An Inner-City Hospital Experience

Background

There has been a rise in the incidence of injection drug use and associated infective endocarditis.

Methods

The clinical outcomes of 39 patients admitted with injection drug use-associated infective endocarditis were collected with a mean follow-up of 14 months. The outcomes were compared for patients treated medically with those undergoing surgical intervention. Re sults: The mean age was 39 ± 11 years; 54% were female. Thirty-two patients (82%) had native and 7 (18%) prosthetic infective endocarditis. The tricuspid valve was affected in 17 patients (43%), the mitral in 10 (26%), the aortic in 4 (10%), and multiple valves in 8 (20%). Sixteen (41%) patients underwent surgery, and 23 (59%) were treated with medical therapy. The indications for surgery included heart failure, systemic emboli, recurrent infection, and vegetation size ≥10 mm. Patients undergoing surgery had a higher rate of paravalvular abscess (25% vs 0%, P = 0.02), valve perforation (37% vs 11%, P = 0.04), and mitral valve involvement (44% vs 13%, P = 0.06), whereas medically treated patients had higher tricuspid valve involvement (61% vs 19%, P = 0.02). During follow-up, 26% of medical and 31% of surgical cohort patients died (P = 0.7). Mortality was highest (54%) among those who continued medical management despite an indication for surgery. Univariate predictors of mortality were age (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.17; P = 0.02), heart failure (OR 6.9; 95% CI: 1.24-37.49; P = 0.02), septicemia (OR 4.40; 95% CI:0.99-19.54; P = 0.05), and shock (OR 10.8; 95% CI: 1.68-69.92; P = 0.01).

Conclusions

Despite contemporary therapy, patients with injection drug use-associated infective endocarditis remain at high risk of complications and poor clinical outcomes. These findings highlight the need for developing new care pathways and a team approach for effective management.

Right-Sided Infective Endocarditis: The Importance of Vegetation Size

BACKGROUND

Right-sided infective endocarditis (IE) carries favourable prognosis compared to left-sided IE. However, the prognostic significance of vegetation size in right-sided IE is less well defined. This study reports the clinical, microbiological, and echocardiographic findings associated with right-sided IE and examines the predictors of adverse outcomes.

METHODS

Consecutive adults admitted with isolated right-sided IE at an Australian tertiary referral centre between June 1999 and May 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified according to intravenous drug user (IVDU) status. Culprit organisms, sepsis severity, treatment regimens, inpatient complications, and vegetation size were recorded. Hospital survivors were followed mean 6.9±4.8 years for late mortality and IE recurrence.

RESULTS

Of 318 consecutive cases of IE, 60 (19%) were isolated right-sided IE and included in this study. Forty-three (43) (72%) patients were current IVDUs, who were younger and more likely to have hepatitis. The majority (90%) of patients were medically managed with multi-agent antimicrobial regimens (median three agents) for a total duration of median 91 days. In-hospital mortality was 3% (2/60). Septic emboli were found in 82% (49/60) of patients, were significantly more common among IVDUs but were not related to vegetation size. Survival after hospital discharge was 100% at 1 year, 96% at 3 years, and 89% at 5 years. Vegetation size >2 cm, chronic kidney disease, and Pitt bacteraemia score were independent predictors of all-cause late mortality. Freedom from IE recurrence was 93% at 1 year, 87% at 3 years, and 84% at 5 years. Vegetation >2.5 cm, prisoner status, and multivalvular IE involvement conferred higher risks of recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with right-sided IE and small vegetations do well with medical management and this should continue to be the preferred strategy. However, those with large vegetations have poorer late outcomes and may require more aggressive treatment and closer follow-up.

Infective endocarditis - can we treat it more effectively?

Infective endocarditis (IE), despite the diagnostic and therapeutic advances, still remains a serious disease associated with high mortality and serious complications. The present guidelines of the European Cardiology Society of 2015 recommend administration of the antibiotics indicated in empirical therapy for multiple weeks and in targeted treatment often for 6-8 weeks. This is associated with a risk of adverse effects of antibiotic therapy in the form of nephro- and/or hepatotoxicity and an increased risk of infections with Clostridioides difficile, while long-term hospitalisation is associated with high non-drug costs. The recommendations developed by the Austrian Society for Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine list dalbavancin among the new antibiotics that may find application in the treatment of IE of staphylococcal aetiology. This antibiotic is a lipoglycopeptide antibiotic alternative to vancomycin in the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus MRSA infections, especially in a situation where the minimum inhibitory concentration for vancomycin is high but below the breakpoint. Dalbavancin has very good pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, with a long duration of action of up to 14 days after administration of a single dose (1500 mg in a 30-minute infusion). This antibiotic is characterised by high clinical efficacy with good treatment tolerance and safety profile, without causing toxic effects in internal organs in comparison with vancomycin. In view of its safety, clinical efficacy and convenient dosing, dalbavancin may prove a useful therapeutic option in the treatment of IE.

Long term surgical outcomes for infective endocarditis in people who inject drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

In recent years, the number of infective endocarditis (IE) cases associated with injection drug use has increased. Clinical guidelines suggest deferring surgery for IE in people who inject drugs (PWID) due to a concern for worse outcomes in comparison to non-injectors (non-PWID). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term outcomes in PWID who underwent cardiac surgery and compared these outcomes to non-PWID.

Methods

We systematically searched for studies reported between 1965 and 2018. We used an algorithm to estimate individual patient data (eIPD) from Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves and combined it with published individual patient data (IPD) to analyze long-term outcomes after cardiac surgery for IE in PWID. Our primary outcome was survival. Secondary outcomes were reoperation and mortality at 30-days, one-, five-, and 10-years. Random effects Cox regression was used for estimating survival.

Results

We included 27 studies in the systematic review and 19 provided data (KM or IPD) for the meta-analysis. PWID were younger and more likely to have S. aureus than non-PWID. Survival at 30-days, one-, five-, and 10-years was 94.3, 81.0, 62.1, and 56.6% in PWID, respectively; and 96.4, 85.0, 70.3, and 63.4% in non-PWID. PWID had 47% greater hazard of death (HR 1.47, 95% CI, 1.05–2.05) and more than twice the hazard of reoperation (HR 2.37, 95% CI, 1.25–4.50) than non-PWID.

Conclusion

PWID had shorter survival that non-PWID. Implementing evidence-based interventions and testing new modalities are urgently needed to improve outcomes in PWID after cardiac surgery.

Valvectomy versus replacement for the surgical treatment of infective tricuspid valve endocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Optimal surgical treatment of infective tricuspid valve endocarditis in patients with intravenous drug use (IVDU) remains controversial. Tricuspid valvectomy has been proposed for infective tricuspid valve endocarditis in this patient population given the inherent social concerns. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare outcomes of valvectomy versus replacement for the surgical treatment of isolated infective tricuspid valve endocarditis.

METHODS

An electronic search was performed to identify all relevant studies published. After assessment for inclusion and exclusion criteria, 16 original studies were pooled for systematic review and meta-analysis.

RESULTS

There were a total of 752 patients with infective tricuspid valve endocarditis, of which 14% underwent valvectomy and 86% underwent replacement (mean follow-up 4.2 years, 95% CI, 1.9-6.4 years). The most common indications for surgical intervention were septic pulmonary embolism in the valvectomy group (74%, 95% CI, 28-95%) and persistent sepsis in the replacement group (62%, 95% CI, 31-86%). There were no differences in rates of stroke [valvectomy 4% (95% CI, 1-11%) vs. replacement 3% (95% CI, 1-16%), P=0.85] but there was increased likelihood of prolonged ventilation in those who underwent valvectomy [valvectomy 40% (95% CI, 30-51%) vs. replacement 26% (95% CI, 23-30%), P<0.01]. There were no differences in 30-day post-operative mortality [valvectomy 13% (95% CI, 5-30%) vs. replacement 7% (95% CI, 5-10%), P=0.21], post-operative right heart failure [valvectomy 27% (95% CI, 10-53%) vs. replacement 11% (95% CI, 5-25%), P=0.17] and recurrent endocarditis [valvectomy 7% (95% CI, 2-23%) vs. replacement 19% (95% CI, 12-28%), P=0.81]. Valvectomy had a higher rate of tricuspid valve reoperation [valvectomy 56% (95% CI, 15-90%) vs. initial replacement 14% (95% CI, 7-27%), P=0.06].

CONCLUSIONS

Tricuspid valvectomy is an acceptable initial therapy for infective tricuspid valve endocarditis in patients with IVDU, providing a bridge to identify those who will self-select as candidates for staged valve replacement.

Hypoxemia Requiring Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation after Tricuspid Valvulectomy for Infective Endocarditis

•

TEE is essential in the diagnosis and management of IE related to IVDU.

•

Tricuspid valvulectomy is performed to manage IVDU-associated IE involving the TV.

•

Intracardiac shunt is possible if refractory hypoxemia occurs after cardiac surgery.

•

Flow through a PFO depends on loading conditions of the right atrium.

•

VV ECMO can be used to manage hypoxemia related to intracardiac shunt.

Dehiscence and embolization of CorMatrix tricuspid valve replacement in the setting of infective endocarditis: a case report

Background

Due to increased morbidity and mortality, prosthetic valve infective endocarditis (IE) with dehiscence requires urgent intervention. Early identification and therapy may prevent embolization.

Case summary

A 27-year-old Caucasian woman with a history of hepatitis C, intravenous drug abuse, and tricuspid valve (TV) replacement was admitted for recurrent IE. She was found to have bacteraemia and fungaemia, and empiric antibiotics were initiated. Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) revealed a mobile ‘mass’ on the TV and dehiscence. The patient developed cardiogenic shock and repeat TTE showed a ruptured TV and absence of the ‘mass’, suspicious of embolization. She underwent emergent surgery with TV replacement using a Biocor valve and retrieval of the old CorMatrix valve found in the right mid pulmonary artery (PA). The patient was successfully weaned off inotropic agents and completed a prolonged course of antibiotics and anti-fungals.

Discussion

The multi-disciplinary decision on timing of surgical intervention was challenging, especially due to ongoing mycobacterial infection that increased operative risk. With clinical deterioration, urgent surgery was performed revealing an embolized prosthetic valve in the PA. New surgical options for TV replacement in IE with extracellular-based material have shown promising outcomes with little reported data of long term complications. This case demonstrates a rare occurrence of embolized CorMatrix TV and highlights the challenge in timing of appropriate surgical intervention in a septic patient with thrombocytopenia.

Endocarditis in the setting of IDU: multidisciplinary management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this article is to provide a brief overview of the medical and surgical management of infective endocarditis secondary to IDU, with a focus on the underlying substance use disorder.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients with infective endocarditis secondary to IDU are often young with unique comorbidities including mental illness, chronic hepatitis C, HIV infection, which are often compounded by limited social and familial supports. The focus of management has been treatment of endocarditis using IV antibiotics alongside surgery. Surgical outcomes compare favorably with those of infective endocarditis in the general population but long-term outcomes of IDUs are significantly worse. This is primarily due to the high rate of recidivism of drug use and the risk of prosthetic valve infective endocarditis. Contemporary management of addiction utilizes an integrative approach, combining both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic strategies while remaining patient-centered. Given the complexity of care required, we advocate for a multidisciplinary team-based approach including psychiatry, infectious disease, cardiology, cardiac surgery and social services.

SUMMARY

Infective endocarditis secondary to IDU remains a medical and surgical challenge with dismal outcomes. Here we offer practical suggestions on the multidisciplinary management of this challenging and high-risk patient cohort.