Time of day does not influence outcomes in acute type A aortic dissection: Results from the IRAD

Race and sex disparities in resource use and outcomes after acute type A aortic dissection repair

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate race-sex-based disparities following acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair.

METHODS

retrospective cohort study (2010-2021) conducted at a high-volume referral aortic center. Multivariable regression models were used to assess race- and sex-stratified differences in mortality and resource utilization.

RESULTS

Women presented at significantly older ages than men within both racial groups (White: 68 vs. 61 years, p ​< ​0.001; Black: 58.5 vs. 49 years, p ​= ​0.002). Black women had the highest comorbidity burden, with 53 ​% having ≥3 comorbidities. They also required more intraoperative blood transfusions and had the longest postoperative hospital stays, while White women were more likely to need prolonged mechanical ventilation. In-hospital mortality did not differ significantly by sex/race, but Black patients experienced worse long-term survival, independent of sex.

CONCLUSION

Significant race- and sex-based disparities exist in perioperative care following ATAAD repair. Further research on social determinants of health is needed to understand patient interactions with surgical care.

Impact of primary entry tear locations on outcomes in acute type A aortic dissection

Few studies have explored the impact of different primary entry tear sites in acute type A aortic dissection. We aimed to evaluate the effect of the primary entry tear location on presentation, treatment, and outcome in this condition. We retrospectively reviewed acute type A aortic dissection repair surgical records at our institution (2004 and 2020) (n = 213). The patients were classified into the ascending aorta entry (As-E), aortic arch entry (Ar-E), and descending thoracic aorta or downstream entry (Dd-E) groups. The As-E group was the oldest (P < 0.01) and included the fewest males (P < 0.01). Pre-operative neurological complication rates were highest in As-E, 16%; Ar-E, 5%; and Dd-E, 0% (P = 0.03). Malperfusion syndrome rates were as follows: As-E, 10%; Ar-E, 2%; and Dd-E, 0% (P = 0.05). As-E was associated with the highest in-hospital mortality (As-E, 13%; Ar-E, 8%; Dd-E, 0%; P = 0.27). In-hospital mortality risk factors included pre-operative neurological complications, malperfusion syndrome, and concomitant procedures. Subanalysis revealed that ascending aortic entry was an independent risk factor for pre-operative acute neurological complications. The primary entry site may indirectly affect outcomes, by mediating the risks of pre-operative complications, which are linked to mortality.

Volume-failure-to-rescue relationship in acute type A aortic dissections: An analysis of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relationship between volume of cases and failure-to-rescue (FTR) rate after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) across the United States.

METHODS

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons adult cardiac surgery database was used to review outcomes of surgery after ATAAD between June 2017 and December 2021. Mixed-effect models and restricted cubic splines were used to determine the risk-adjusted relationships between ATAAD average volume and FTR rate. FTR calculation was based on deaths associated with the following complications: venous thromboembolism/deep venous thrombosis, stroke, renal failure, mechanical ventilation >48 hours, sepsis, gastrointestinal complications, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and unplanned reoperation.

RESULTS

In total, 18,192 patients underwent surgery for ATAAD in 832 centers. The included hospitals' median volume was 2.2 cases/year (interquartile range [IQR], 0.9-5.8). Quartiles' distribution was 615 centers in the first (1.3 cases/year, IQR, 0.4-2.9); 123 centers in the second (8 cases/year, IQR, 6.7-10.2); 66 centers in the third (15.6 cases/year, IQR, 14.2-18); and 28 centers in the fourth quartile (29.3 cases/year, IQR, 28.8-46.0). Fourth-quartile hospitals performed more extensive procedures. Overall complication, mortality, and FTR rates were 52.6%, 14.2%, and 21.7%, respectively. Risk-adjusted analysis demonstrated increased odds of FTR when the average volume was fewer than 10 cases per year.

CONCLUSIONS

Although high-volume centers performed more complex procedures than low-volume centers, their operative mortality was lower, perhaps reflecting their ability to rescue patients and mitigate complications. An average of fewer than 10 cases per year at an institution is associated with increased odds of failure to rescue patients after ATAAD repair.

Twenty-five years of observations from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) and its impact on the cardiovascular scientific community

OBJECTIVE

The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) celebrated its 25th anniversary in January 2021. This study evaluated IRAD's role in promoting the understanding and management of acute aortic dissection (AD) over these years.

METHODS

IRAD studies were identified, analyzed, and ranked according to their citations per year (c/y) to determine the most-cited IRAD studies and topics. A systematic search of the literature identified cardiovascular guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute AD. Consequently, IRAD's presence and impact were quantified using these documents.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven IRAD studies were identified, of which 82 obtained more than 10 cumulative citations. The median c/y index was 7.33 (25th-75th percentile, 4.01-16.65). Forty-two studies had a greater than median c/y index and were considered most impactful. Of these studies, most investigated both type A and type B AD (n = 17, 40.5%) and short-term outcomes (n = 26, 61.9%). Nineteen guideline documents were identified from 26 cardiovascular societies located in Northern America, Europe, and Japan. Sixty-nine IRAD studies were cited by these guidelines, including 38 of the 42 most-impactful IRAD studies. Among them, partial thrombosis of the false lumen as a predictor of postdischarge mortality and aortic diameters as a predictor of type A occurrence were determined as most-impactful specific IRAD topics by their c/y index.

CONCLUSIONS

IRAD has had and continues to have an important role in providing observations, credible knowledge, and research questions to improve the outcomes of patients with acute AD.

Weekend Effect and Mortality Outcomes in Aortic Dissection: A Prospective Analysis

Background

Aortic dissection (AD) is a critical heart condition with potentially severe outcomes. Our study aimed to investigate the existence of a "weekend effect" in AD by examining the correlation between patient outcomes and whether their treatment occurred on weekdays versus weekends.

Methods

Specifically, we prospectively analysed the effect of weekday and weekend treatment on acute AD patient outcomes, both before surgical intervention and during hospitalization, for 124 patients treated from 2019-2021, as well as during 6 months of follow-up.

Results

The mean age of the study population was 62.5 years, and patient age exhibited a high degree of variability. We recorded a mortality rate before surgery of 8.65% for the weekend group and 15% for the weekday group, but this difference was not statistically significant. During hospitalization, mortality was 50% in the weekend group and 25% in the weekday group, but this difference was not statistically significant. Discharge mortality was 9.61% in the weekend group and 5% in the weekday group.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that there was no significant difference in mortality rates between patients admitted to the hospital on weekends versus weekdays. Therefore, the period of the week when a patient presents to the hospital with AD appears not to affect their mortality.

Off-hours Surgery and Mortality in Patients With Type A Aortic Dissection Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The impact of off-hours admission (such as weekends, nighttime, and non-working hours) vs. regular hours (weekdays and daytime working hours) on the mortality risk of patients undergoing surgery for type A aortic dissection (TAAD) repair is still uncertain. To address this uncertainty, we undertook a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. We aimed to assess the potential link between off-hours admission and the risk of mortality in patients undergoing TAAD repair surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a thorough search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases, covering the period from their inception to May 20, 2023. Our inclusion criteria encompassed all studies that examined the potential relationship between off-hour admission and mortality in individuals who had undergone surgery for TAAD repair. The odds ratios (ORs) were extracted and combined utilizing a random effects model for our synthesis.

RESULTS

Nine studies with 16,501 patients undergoing TAAD repair surgery were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, patients who underwent surgery during the weekend had higher in-hospital mortality (pooled OR, 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-1.75; p=0.002) than those treated on weekdays. However, the mortality risks among patients who underwent TAAD surgery during nighttime and non-working hours were not significantly elevated compared to daytime and working hours admission.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekend surgery for TAAD was associated with a higher in-hospital mortality risk than weekday surgery. However, further studies are warranted to identify and develop strategies to improve the quality of round-the-clock care for patients with TAAD.

Midterm Follow-up of the Transatrial-to-Left Ventricle Cannulation for Acute Type A Dissection

BACKGROUND

It is still controversial as to which cannulation strategy for acute type A aortic dissection (AAD) is optimal. Antegrade perfusion to diminish further organ malperfusion and ischemia is preferable.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a total of 420 patients who underwent AAD surgery from January 2001 to December 2020. Group A included 229 patients with a transatrial cannulation; group B included 191 patients with all other additionally used cannulation sites. A retrospective analysis was conducted at 30 days and according to clinical outcome and midterm mortality. Risk factors for probability of death were analyzed by multifactorial logistic regression.

RESULTS

The calculated risk scores and demographic preoperative variables were comparable except for hyperlipoproteinemia (P = .011) and redo operation in group B (P < .001) and more pericardial tamponade in group A (P = .006). In addition, fewer patients with postoperative new onset of renal failure were observed in group A (P = .039), although new onset of dialysis was not different between the groups (P = .878). Patients in group A were discharged from the hospital significantly earlier (P = .004). Nevertheless, although significantly more total arch surgery was performed in group A, shorter operation times (P < .001) and lower transfusion rates were observed in group A. Patients' follow-up after a median time of 3.6 (0.6-7.6) years showed no difference in 30-day, 1-year, and long-term mortality. Multivariate logistic regression revealed aortic valve stenosis (P = .041), coronary artery bypass graft surgical procedures (P = .014), preoperative cardiopulmonary resuscitation (P < .001), and length of surgery (P = .032) as the strongest risk factors for mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Transatrial cannulation for AAD operation was safe and successfully performed under emergent conditions. Although no benefit in mortality was achieved, clinical benefits of shorter operation times, less transfusion, better kidney preservation, and earlier discharge of the patient were observed.

Outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection during the COVID-19 pandemic: An analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database

PURPOSE

There have been reported reductions of hospital presentation for acute cardiovascular conditions such as myocardial infarction and acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study examined presentation patterns and outcomes of ATAAD in North America immediately before, and during, the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (STS ACSD) was queried to identify patients presenting with ATAAD in the 12 months pre-pandemic (March 2019-February 2020), and during the early pandemic (March through June 2020). Demographics and operative characteristics were compared using χ² test and Wilcoxon Rank-sum test. The median annual case volume designated low-volume centers versus high-volume centers (>10 cases per month). Step-wise variable selection was used to create a risk set used for adjustment of all multivariable models.

RESULTS

There were 5480 patients identified: 4346 pre-pandemic and 1134 during pandemic. There was significantly lower volume of median cases per month during the COVID-19 pandemic period (286 interquartile range [IQR]: 256-306 vs. 372 IQR: 291-433,p = .0152). In historically low-volume centers (<10 cases per year), there was no difference in volume between the two periods (142 IQR: 133-166 vs. 177 IQR: 139-209, p = NS). In high-volume centers, there was a decline during the pandemic (140 IQR: 123-148 vs. 212 IQR: 148-224, p = .0052). There was no difference in overall hospital-to-hospital transfers during the two time periods (54% of cases pre-pandemic, 55% during). Patient demographics, operative characteristics, malperfusion rates, and cardiac risk factors were similar between the two time periods. There was no difference in unadjusted operative mortality (19.01% pre-pandemic vs. 18.83% during, p = .9) nor major morbidity (52.42% pre-pandemic vs. 51.24% during, p = .5). Risk-adjusted multivariable models showed no difference in either operative mortality nor major morbidity between time periods.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients presenting to the hospital with ATAAD during the first surge of the pandemic, operative outcomes were similar to pre-pandemic despite a 30% reduction in volume. Out-of-hospital mortality from ATAAD during the pandemic remains unknown. Further understanding these findings will inform management of ATAAD during future pandemics.

Impact of shift work on surgical outcomes at different times in patients with acute type A aortic dissection: A retrospective cohort study

Background

To investigate the effect of shift work on surgical outcomes at different times in patients with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD).

Materials and methods

Patients with ATAAD who underwent total arch replacement at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from January 2015 to March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were managed according to the green channel emergency management strategy, and a professional cardiac team was arranged during off-hours. Based on surgery time and symptom onset to procedure time, the patients were divided into weekday, weekend and holiday groups; daytime and nighttime groups; intervention time ≤48 h and >48 h groups; working hours and off-hours groups. In-hospital mortality between these groups was compared.

Results

In total, 499 ATAAD patients underwent surgery within 7 days of symptom onset, and the in-hospital mortality rate was 10% (n = 50/499). Among the 499 patients, 320 (64.13%), 128 (25.65%) and 51 (10.22%) underwent surgery on weekdays, weekends and holidays, respectively. In-hospital mortality and 7-day mortality showed no significant difference among the three groups. Two hundred twenty-seven (45.5%) underwent daytime surgery, and 272 (54.5%) underwent nighttime surgery. Durations of ICU stay and hospital stay were significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05). There was no significant differences in in-hospital mortality (9.2% vs. 10.7%) and 7-day mortality (4.4% vs. 6.6%). 221 patients (44.3%) and 278 patients (55.7%) were included in the intervention time ≤48 h and >48 h groups, respectively. Acute renal injury, ICU stay and hospital stay were significantly different (P < 0.05) whereas 7-day mortality (5.0% vs. 6.1%) and in-hospital mortality (8.6% vs. 11.1%) were not. Furthermore, 7-day (1.9% vs. 6.6%) and in-hospital mortality (11.1% vs. 9.8%) showed no difference between working hours group (n = 108) and off-hours group (n = 391). Cox regression analysis showed that postoperative acute renal injury (HR = 2.423; 95% CI, 1.214–4.834; P = 0.012), pneumonia (HR = 2.542; 95% CI, 1.186–5450; P = 0.016) and multiple organ dysfunction (HR = 11.200; 95% CI, 5.549–22.605; P = 0.001) were the main factors affecting hospital death in ATAAD patients.

Conclusion

Under the management of a professional cardiac surgery team with dedicated off-hours shifts, surgery time was not related to in-hospital mortality in ATAAD patients.

Impact of after-hours surgery on outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection repair

PURPOSE

To establish whether emergency surgery performed outside working hours (after hours) contributed to adverse outcomes for patients with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD).

METHODS

We reviewed the operation records of ATAAD repair in our institution from 2004 to 2019 (n = 187). Emergency surgery was performed by one of a few teams of experienced surgeons, regardless of the time of day. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgery start time: during working hours (n = 65) and after hours (n = 122). A propensity score-matched analysis was performed for 58 pairs of patients.

RESULTS

The overall in-hospital mortality was 6.9% for the working-hours group and 13.8% for the after-hours group. There were no significant differences between the groups in the relatively limited study population (n = 187). Surgeon experience and aortic interventions did not differ remarkably between the groups. After-hours repair was not associated with postoperative complications. There were no significant differences in the long-term survival or aortic event-free rates between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

After-hours surgery did not affect the short- or long-term outcomes of ATAAD repair under our backup system, which supports the recommendation of immediate surgical repair. Efforts to minimize the discrepancies between working hours and after hours could help to improve the surgical outcomes of patients undergoing ATAAD repair.

Misdiagnosis of Thoracic Aortic Disease Occurs Commonly in Emergency Transfers

BACKGROUND

Acute aortic syndromes (AAS) are prone to misdiagnosis by facilities with limited diagnostic experience. We assessed long-term trends in misdiagnosis among patients transferred to a tertiary care facility with presumed AAS.

METHODS

Our institutional transfer center database was queried for emergency transfers in patients with a diagnosis of acute aortic syndromes or thoracic aortic aneurysm between January 2008 and May 2018. 784 patients were classified as emergency transfer for presumed AAS. Transferring diagnosis and actual diagnosis were compared through a review of physician notes and radiology reports from referring facilities and our center.

RESULTS

Mean age was 62 years, with 61% (n=478) men. Differences in transferring diagnosis and actual diagnosis were identified in 89 (11.4%) patients. Among misdiagnosed patients, the wrong classification of Stanford Type A or Type B dissections was identified among 24 (27%) patients. Twenty-three (26%) patients with a referring diagnosis of aortic dissection were found to have no dissection. Eighteen patients (20%) transferred for contained/impending rupture did not have signs of rupture. All misdiagnoses were secondary to misinterpretation of radiographic imaging, with motion artifacts (n=14, 16%) and post-surgical changes (n=22, 25%) being common sources of diagnostic error. Sixty-four (72%) patients underwent repeat scans at our facility due to limited access or sub-optimal quality of outside imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

While AAS misdiagnosis rates appear to be improving from the prior decade, there are opportunities for improved physician awareness through campaigns such as "Think Aorta." Centralized web-based imaging may prevent the costly hazards of unnecessary emergency transfer.

Outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection repair: Daytime versus nighttime

Objective

We sought to report our experience of repairing acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) over 21 years during in-hours versus out-of-hours before and after the establishment of specialized aortic service and rota.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of all patients who had ATAAD repair between November 1998 and December 2019 in our center. In-hours were defined as 08:00 to 19:59 hours and out of hours were defined as 20:00 to 07:59 hours.

Results

A total of 286 patients underwent repair of ATAAD. Eighty operations took place during the prerota period (43 operations in hours, 37 out of hours) and 206 operations during the specialized rota period (110 in hours, 96 out of hours). There was no difference in 30-day mortality between the in-hours and out-of-hours groups in either the prerota (23.3% vs 32.4%; P = .36) or specialized rota periods (11.6% vs 11.5%; P = .94). Mean number of cases per year increased by 83% between the prerota and specialized rota periods. Thirty-day mortality reduced in both the in-hours (23.3% vs 11.6%) and out-of-hours (32.4% vs 11.5%) groups since introduction of the specialized aortic rota.

Conclusions

Outcomes in repair of ATAAD during in-hours and out-of-hours periods are similar when operated on in a specialized unit with a dedicated aortic team. This emphasizes the current global trend of service centralization without particular attention to time of day to operate on such critical cohort patients.

Cardiac surgery in the afternoon is not associated with increased operative morbidity and mortality

BACKGROUND

Time of day for surgical procedures has been a topic of considerable controversy, with some suggesting that later operating times are associated with worse outcomes.

METHODS

All patients who underwent open cardiac surgery from 2011 to 2018 were included. Patients that had ventricular assist devices, heart transplant, transcatheter aortic valves, aortic dissections, and emergent operations were excluded. Primary outcomes included postoperative mortality and survival; secondary outcomes included postoperative complications and readmission.

RESULTS

The initial patient population consisted of 7883 patients who underwent index cardiac surgery. Following propensity matching (3:1), there were 2569 patients in the a.m. cohort (7-11 a.m.) and 860 patients in the p.m. cohort (3-11 p.m.). All baseline characteristics were matched to equivalent proportions. Total intensive care unit time following surgery was longer for the a.m. cohort (46.5 vs. 40.0 h; p<.001). Otherwise, there was no significant difference between cohorts including operative mortality (1.83% vs 2.21%; p= .48). On multivariable analysis, p.m. surgery was not significantly associated with 30 days mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.96 [0.60, 1.53]; p= .86] or mortality over the study follow-up (HR: 0.87 [0.73, 1.03]; p= .10]. For propensity-matched cohorts, Kaplan-Meier survival at 30 days (97.9% vs. 97.4%; p= .44), 1 (93.4% vs  93.9%; p= .51), and 5 years (80.9% vs. 80.2%; p= .84) was not significantly different between cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Short- and long-term mortality, hospital readmission, and postoperative complications were not significantly different between patients that underwent cardiac surgery starting in the a.m. versus patients who had cases that started in the afternoon.