Minimally invasive approaches to primary cardiac tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

CARDIAC TUMORS: UPDATED CLASSIFICATIONS AND MAIN CLINICO-PATHOLOGIC FINDINGS

This review article - which is devoted to a wide range of physicians, e.g., pathologists, clinicians, radiologists, and general practitioners - is an up-to-date clinico-pathological description of cardiac tumours. Although rare, cardiac tumours are key components in oncology practice since both their early diagnosis and appropriate management denote urgent needs. Primary cardiac tumours (PCTs) are categorized in recent WHO classifications as well as in other scientific contributions. Their incidence is around 0.02% while their prevalence is between 0.001% and 0.03%. Among PCTs, benign lesions account for 85% of cases, while malignant neoplasms for 15%. Compared to PCTs, secondary cardiac tumours are 20-30-fold more common. The most frequent PCTs in adulthood are papillary fibroelastoma and cardiac myxoma, while, in childhood, cardiac rhabdomyoma. Heart metastases may occur through direct extension, or, indirectly, via bloodstream, lymphatics or intracavitary diffusion. Thoracic cancers (e.g. from pleura, lung, breast) are the most frequent cause of cardiac metastasis followed by oesophageal and haematological malignancies. Symptoms of PCTs (e.g. arrhythmias, dyspnoea, chest discomfort, syncope) are usually the result of both their regional involvement and location. Non-invasive imaging techniques (e.g. echocardiography, MRI, CT) and biopsy are key means in delineating tumour characteristics, size, and adjacent structure involvement. Most PCTs require surgery, which is recommended to prevent life-threatening complications. While many benign cardiac neoplasms may be completely resected, the treatment of choice for malignant PCTs and metastases is a combination of surgery, radio- and/or chemotherapy, as well as new alternative treatments, which may prolong survival in a small patient subset.

Case Report: Primary cardiac synovial sarcoma invading the tricuspid valve in a pregnant woman

Primary cardiac synovial sarcoma (PCSS) is a rare and highly aggressive tumor with a significant mortality rate. Treatment guidelines have not been defined given the relative rarity of the condition, especially for pregnant women. Described herein is a 36-year-old pregnant woman at 29 weeks with gestation who was hospitalized due to chest tightness and nausea, and echocardiography found a mass involved in the right heart and the tricuspid valve. She had to undergo cardiac surgery because the mass almost blocked the opening of the tricuspid valve. She underwent a radical resection of the masses and tricuspid valve, followed by replacement of the tricuspid valve with a mechanical valve. She successfully delivered a healthy baby boy. The diagnosis of synovial sarcoma is confirmed by positive results indicating rearrangement of the SYT gene. The patient survived throughout the 30-month follow-up period. There are no reported cases of pregnant women diagnosed with cardiac synovial sarcoma and have undergone cardiac surgery and cesarean section. Our treatment plan not only maximizes patient survival but also ensures fetal survival. This situation is rare and needs documentation.

Long-Term Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Versus Sternotomy Surgical Resection of Primary Cardiac Tumors

OBJECTIVE

Primary cardiac tumors are uncommon, often benign, but can be potentially life threatening. Minimally invasive endoscopic (ENDO) techniques have been shown to be a feasible alternative for tumor resection compared with conventional sternotomy (CS). This study compared the clinical and surgical outcomes of a small series of patients undergoing cardiac tumor resection operations.

METHODS

Between November 2009 and December 2022, 34 consecutive patients underwent cardiac tumor resection using either ENDO (n = 21) or CS (n = 13) techniques. We compared early perioperative outcomes, echocardiographic outcomes, and long-term clinical and tumor recurrence outcomes.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar between groups; however, the ENDO group included younger patients (56 ± 16 vs 62 ± 17 years) and more female patients (83% vs 53%). The tumor was located in the left atrium (n = 19, 56%), right atrium (n = 5, 15%), or either ventricle (n = 4, 12%). In-hospital mortality and stroke frequency were similar for both groups (n = 0). There was no significant difference in cardiopulmonary bypass or cross-clamp times, respiratory or renal failure, or intensive care unit or hospital lengths of stay. At follow-up (ENDO, 42 [2 to 131] months vs CS, 54 [1 to 156] months), there were no deaths in the ENDO group and 2 patients died in the CS group (P = 0.21). No patients in either group experienced tumor recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

In selected patients, both ENDO and CS approaches to primary cardiac tumor resection were safe, effective, durable, and associated with similarly good early and late results.

Minimally-invasive approach via percutaneous femoral cannulation for the resection of intra-cardiac masses: a single center experience in the Middle-East

BACKGROUND

Intra-cardiac masses are rare and challenging lesions with an overall incidence ranging of 0.02-0.2%. Minimally invasive approaches have been recently introduced for surgical resection of these lesions. Here, we evaluated our early experience using minimally invasive techniques in addressing intra-cardiac lesions.

METHODOLOGY

This is a retrospective descriptive study conducted between April 2018 to December 2020. All patients were diagnosed with cardiac tumors and treated via a right mini-thoracotomy with cardiopulmonary bypass through femoral cannulation at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah.

RESULTS

Myxoma was the most common pathology representing 46% of cases followed by thrombus (27%), leiomyoma (9%), lipoma (9%) and angiosarcoma (9%). All tumors were resected with negative margins. One patient was converted to open sternotomy. Tumor locations were in the right atrium, left atrium, and left ventricle in 5, 3, and 3 patients, respectively. The median ICU stay was 1.33 days. The median length of hospitalization was 5.7 days. There was no 30-days hospital mortality recorded in this cohort.

CONCLUSION

Our early experience shows that minimally invasive resection can be performed safely and effectively for intra-cardiac masses. The minimally invasive approach using a mini-thoracotomy with percutaneous femoral cannulation can be an effective alternative in resecting intra-cardiac masses that achieves clear margin resection, quick post-operative recovery, and low rates of recurrence for benign lesions.

Long-term outcomes after minimal right lateral thoracotomy for the resection of cardiac tumors

OBJECTIVES

Cardiac tumors are a rare and heterogeneous entity, with a cumulative incidence of up to 0.02%. This study aimed to investigate one of the largest patient cohorts for long-term outcomes after minimally-invasive cardiac surgery using right-anterior thoracotomy and femoral cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) cannulation.

METHODS

Between 2009 and 2021, patients who underwent minimally-invasive cardiac tumor removal at our department were included. The diagnosis was confirmed postoperatively by (immune-) histopathological analysis. Preoperative baseline characteristics, intraoperative data, and long-term survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

Between 2009 and 2021, 183 consecutive patients underwent surgery for a cardiac tumor at our department. Of these, n = 74 (40%) were operated on using a minimally-invasive approach. The majority, n = 73 (98.6%), had a benign cardiac tumor, and 1 (1.4%) had a malignant cardiac tumor. The mean age was 60 ± 14 years, and n = 45 (61%) of patients were female. The largest group of tumors was myxoma (n = 62; 84%). Tumors were predominantly located in the left atrium in 89% (n = 66). CPB-time was 97 ± 36min and aortic cross-clamp time 43 ± 24 min s. The mean hospital stay was 9.7 ± 4.5 days. The perioperative mortality was 0%, and all-cause mortality after ten years was 4.1%.

CONCLUSION

Minimally-invasive tumor excision is feasible and safe, predominantly in benign cardiac tumors, even in combination with concurrent procedures. Patients who require cardiac tumor removal should be evaluated for minimally-invasive cardiac surgery at a specialized center, as it is highly effective and associated with good long-term survival.