Size does matter: Yet BMI extremes are manageable in minimally invasive cardiac surgery

Impact of Bariatric Surgery on Mortality of Mitral Valve Surgery: A National Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Obesity is a common comorbidity of cardiac surgery patients. The goal of this study is to determine if a lower weight achieved through bariatric surgery has any association with mitral valve (MV) replacement or repair surgery mortality.

METHODS

This study used a retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample dataset from 2012 to 2020. Adult patients who underwent MV surgery with normal weight following bariatric surgery (n = 1,125) and patients with obesity (n = 48,555) were compared. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

This study included 49,680 patients. The median age was 64 (55 to 71) years, and the majority were female (55%). Bariatric surgery was found to significantly decrease the odds of mortality, even after adjusting for important covariates, indicating a reduction of mortality risk by 54% (adjusted odds ratio = 0.46, p = 0.024). Other significant protective factors include isolated and elective surgery. Significant risk factors were older age, female sex, and diabetes mellitus. Patients who were obese demonstrated longer lengths of stay (LOS), greater transfers to other facilities, and higher hospital costs.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients receiving MV surgery, bariatric surgery demonstrated significant survival benefits during hospitalization, in addition to reducing LOS and cost. Our data support prior evidence of bariatric surgery improving cardiovascular outcomes. Therefore, bariatric surgery may be a meaningful method of weight loss to improve surgical patient outcomes in patients with obesity. However, longer-term data are needed.

Isolated Tricuspid Valve Repair Versus Replacement: Predictors of Mortality on the National Level

OBJECTIVE

Isolated tricuspid valve surgery (TVR) is rarely performed, and literature reports are confined to small sample sizes and old studies. Thus, the advantage of repair over replacement could not be determined. We aimed to evaluate repair and replacement outcomes along with predictors of mortality for TVR on a national level.

METHODS

All adult patients (18+ years old) who underwent TVR from 2011 to 2020 were identified using the National Inpatient Sample dataset. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included complications, length of stay (LOS), hospitalization cost, and discharge disposition.

RESULTS

Over a 10-year period, 37,931 patients had TVR and predominantly underwent repair (n = 25,027, 66.0%). In comparison with patients who underwent tricuspid replacement, more patients with a history of liver disease and pulmonary hypertension presented for repair surgery, and fewer patients had endocarditis and rheumatic valve disease (P < 0.001). The repair group had less mortality, less stroke, shorter LOS, and reduced cost, while the replacement group had fewer myocardial infarctions (P < 0.05). However, the outcomes were not different for cardiac arrest, wound complications, or bleeding. After excluding congenital TV disease and adjusting for relevant factors, TV repair was associated with a reduced in-hospital mortality by 28% (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.72, P = 0.011). Older age increased mortality risk by 3-fold, prior stroke by 2-fold, and liver diseases by 5-fold (P < 0.001). Patients undergoing TVR in recent years had a better chance of survival (aOR = 0.92, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

TV repair has better outcomes than replacement does. Patient comorbidities and late presentation play an independently significant role in determining outcomes.

Surgical versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch on outcomes

BACKGROUND

The hemodynamics of most prosthetic valves are often inferior to that of the normal native valve, and a significant proportion of patients undergoing surgical (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have high residual transaortic pressure gradients due to prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM). As the experience with TAVR has increased and long-term outcomes are reported, a close look at the PPM literature is required in light of new evidence.

METHODS

For this review, we searched the Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases from 2000 to 2022. Articles reporting PPM as an outcome following aortic valve replacements were identified and reviewed.

RESULTS

The impact of PPM on clinical outcomes in aortic valve replacement has not been clear as multiple studies failed to report PPM incidence. However, the PPM outcomes after SAVR vary more widely than after TAVR, ranging from 8% to 80% in SAVR and from 24% to 35% in TAVR. Incidence of severe PPM following redo SAVR ranges from 2% to 9% and following valve-in-valve TAVR is from 14% to 33%, however, while PPM is higher in valve-in-valve TAVR, patients had better survival rates.

CONCLUSIONS

The gap between valve performance and clinical outcomes in SAVR and TAVR could be reduced by carefully selecting patients for either treatment option. Understanding predictors of PPM can add to the safety, effectiveness, and increased survival benefit of both SAVR and TAVR.