The application of PAX1 methylation detection and HPV E6/E7 mRNA detection in cervical cancer screening

Clinical indications for host-cell DNA methylation markers in cervical screening and management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A review

DNA methylation of host-cell genes is an epigenetic process that regulates gene expression and is associated with cervical cancer development. Studies on the natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and the molecular alterations associated with cervical carcinogenesis led to the identification of several host-cell DNA methylation markers. Over the past years, various studies on methylation markers have shown promising results in terms of diagnostic and prognostic value to improve cervical cancer screening and management of CIN. This review provides an overview of the clinical indications of host-cell DNA methylation markers in cervical screening and management of CIN, and outlines avenues for further applications.

Comparing the performance of DeoxyriboNucleic Acid methylation analysis and cytology for detecting cervical (pre)cancer in women with high-risk human papillomavirus-positive status in a gynecologic outpatient population

BACKGROUND

Primary screening for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) with cytological triage for women with non-16/18 hrHPV-positive status has become popular in China. However, cytology relies on the subjective judgment of pathologists, leading to inconsistent clinical performance.

METHODS

A total of 657 hrHPV-positive women aged 25-64 years were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. All participants underwent colposcopic biopsy after cytology triage, with cytology residual specimens undergoing DNA methylation testing. CIN2+ and CIN3+ sensitivity and specificity were compared between the different triage strategies (n=487): PAX1 methylation (PAX1m) , Glycophorin C methylation (GYPCm), cytology, and combinations between them or with HPV16/18.

RESULTS

The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) for PAX1m and GYPCm in detecting CIN2 or worse (CIN2+) were 0.867 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.796-0.937) and 0.873 (95% CI: 0.808-0.938), respectively. The sensitivities of PAX1m and GYPCm were consistent with those of cytology for both CIN2+ and CIN3+ detection. The relative specificities of PAX1m and GYPCm for CIN2+ detection compared to cytology were 2.83 (95% CI: 2.33-2.45) and 3.09 (95% CI: 2.40-3.98), respectively. The relative specificities of combining HPV 16/18 with PAX1m and GYPCm for CIN2+ detection compared to cytology were 3.38 (95% CI: 2.96-3.86) and 3.67 (95% CI: 3.15-4.27), respectively. Compared to low levels of DNA methylation, high levels of PAX1m and GYPCm resulted in odd ratios (ORs) of 57.66 (95% CI: 13.57-409.12, p < 0.001) and 23.87 (95% CI: 6.49-115.42, p < 0.001) for CIN3+, adjusted for HPV 16/18 and cytology results.

CONCLUSIONS

PAX1m and GYPCm demonstrated superior ability to identify cervical precancerous lesions and cervical cancer, with AUC values exceeding 0.85. For detecting CIN2+/CIN3+ in women with hrHPV-positive status, DNA methylation (combined with HPV 16/18) showed higher specificity than cytology (combined with HPV 16/18) and is a potential molecular biomarker for detecting cervical (pre)cancer.

Triage performance of PAX1m/JAM3m in opportunistic cervical cancer screening of non‒16/18 human papillomavirus-positive women: a multicenter prospective study in China

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we aimed to validate the performance of the PAX1 and JAM3 methylation (PAX1m/JAM3m) test as a triage tool for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse (CIN3 +) in non-16/18 high-risk human papillomavirus-positive patients (non-16/18 hrHPV +).

METHODS

The triage performance of liquid-based cytology (LBC) and the PAX1m/JAM3m test for detecting CIN3 + were compared.

RESULTS

In total, 1851 participants had cervical histological outcomes and were included in the analysis. The sensitivity/specificity of the LBC test results with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or worse (LBC ≥ ASCUS) and the PAX1m/JAM3m test were 90.1%/26.7% and 84.8%/88.5%, respectively. PAX1m/JAM3m( +) had the highest diagnostic AUC (0.866, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.837-0.896) in the whole cohort. All cancers (n = 20) were detected by PAX1m/JAM3m(+). Compared with LBC ≥ ASCUS, PAX1m/JAM3m(+) reduced the number of patients who needed referral for colposcopy by 57.21% (74.66% vs. 17.45%). The odds ratios for detecting CIN3 + by LBC ≥ ASCUS and PAX1m/JAM3m(+) were 3.3 (95% CI 2.0-5.9) and 42.6 (27.1-69.6), respectively (p < 0.001). The combination of LBC ≥ ASCUS or PAX1m/JAM3m(+) slightly increased the diagnostic sensitivity (98.0%, 95% CI: 95.8-100%) and referral rate (77.09%) but reduced the diagnostic specificity (24.8%, 22.7-26.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

In non-16/18 hrHPV(+) women, PAX1m/JAM3m was superior to cytology for detecting CIN3 + . Compared with LBC ≥ ASCUS, PAX1m/JAM3m(+) reduced the number of significant referrals to colposcopy without compromising diagnostic sensitivity.

Evaluating PAX1 methylation for cervical cancer screening triage in non-16/18 hrHPV-positive women

BACKGROUND

In China, the national cervical cancer screening protocol involves initial testing for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV), followed by cytology for hrHPV-positive cases. This study evaluates the effectiveness of PAX1 methylation (PAX1m) analysis in identifying precancerous or cancerous lesions in cervical samples from Chinese women positive for non-16/18 hrHPV strains.

METHODS

Between February 2022 and March 2023, 281 cervical samples from non-16/18 hrHPV-positive women underwent cytological examination and PAX1m analysis. The study assessed the statistical relationship between PAX1m levels and the presence of cervical lesions, comparing the diagnostic performance of PAX1m to conventional cytology.

RESULTS

A significant association was found between PAX1 methylation levels and the risk of CIN2 + and CIN3 + lesions, with 47 instances of CIN2 + detected. Odds ratios (ORs) for moderate and high PAX1m levels were 8.86 (95% CI: 2.24-42.17) and 166.32 (95% CI: 47.09-784.97), respectively. The area under the ROC curve for PAX1m in identifying CIN2 + lesions was 0.948 (95% CI: 0.895-0.99). PAX1m demonstrated similar sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) to cytology but reduced the colposcopy referral rate from 47.7% with cytology alone to 25.6% with PAX1m, showing superior specificity and positive predictive value across age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

PAX1 methylation is a strong indicator of CIN2 + and CIN3 + risk, offering diagnostic performance comparable to cytology with the added benefit of reduced unnecessary colposcopy referrals. These findings support the use of PAX1m analysis as a reliable tool for triaging non-16/18 hrHPV-positive women in outpatient settings.

PAX1/JAM3 Methylation and HPV Viral Load in Women with Persistent HPV Infection

The relationship of PAX1/JAM3 methylation as well as HPV viral load (VL) with cervical lesions has been reported, but their role in persistent HPV infection without cervical high-grade lesions has not been fully elucidated. A total of 231 females diagnosed with persistent HPV infection and pathologically confirmed absence of high-grade cervical lesions were selected from the Colposcopy Outpatient Clinic of Peking University People's Hospital, from March 2023 to December 2023. They were categorized into two groups based on the duration of HPV infection: the HPV persistent less than 3 years group and the more than 3 years group. PAX1/JAM3 methylation and HPV VL were determined by real-time PCR and BioPerfectus Multiplex Real-Time (BMRT)-HPV reports type-specific VL/10,000 cells, respectively. The average age of individuals with HPV infection lasting more than 3 years was higher compared to those with less than 3 years (48.9 vs. 45.1 years), with a statistically significant difference. Among the participants, 81.8% (189/231) had no previous screening. The methylation levels of JAM3 and PAX1 were significantly higher in individuals with HPV infection persisting for more than 3 years compared to those with less than 3 years, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). There was a significant correlation between PAX1 and JAM3 methylation (p < 0.001), which could be used as cumulative evidence of HPV infection duration before the occurrence of precancerous lesions. The incidence of vaginal intraepithelial lesions was higher in individuals with HPV infection persisting for more than 3 years compared to those with less than 3 years, and HPV VL can be used as an indicative biomarker for concurrent cervical-vaginal lesions, especially for HPV other than 16/18 genotypes.

PAX1 and SEPT9 methylation analyses in cervical exfoliated cells are highly efficient for detecting cervical (pre)cancer in hrHPV-positive women

Studies have investigated PAX1 and SEPT methylation were closely associated with cervical cancer. For this study, we verified the expressions of PAX1 and SEPT9 methylation in 236 hrHPV women cervical exfoliated cells by using quantitative methylation-specific PCR and we further explored their diagnostic value in cervical (pre)cancer detection. Our results identified that the methylation rates and levels of PAX1 and SEPT9 increased with cervical lesion severity. For a diagnosis of cervical (pre)cancer, the area under the curve (AUC) of PAX1 methylation was 0.77 (95% CI 0.71-0.83) and the AUC of SEPT9 methylation was 0.86 (95% CI 0.81∼0.90). Analyses of the PAX1 and SEPT9 methylation statuses alone or combined with commonly used tests can efficiently identify cervical (pre)cancer. In particular, SEPT9 methylation might serve as an effective and powerful biomarker for the diagnosis of cervical (pre)cancer and as an alternative triage test in HPV-based cervical (pre)cancer screening programs.Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? This subject showed that PAX1 and SEPT9 methylation were closely associated with cervical cancer. The methylation rates and levels of PAX1 and SEPT9 increased with cervical lesion severity and reached a peak in cervical cancer exfoliated cells. We further assessed the diagnostic performances of PAX1 and SEPT9 methylation in cervical cancer screening. In detecting cervical (pre)cancer, the sensitivity values of PAX1 and SEPT9 methylation were up to 61.18% and 82.35%, respectively, and the specificity values of PAX1 and SEPT9 methylation were up to 95.36% and 86.75%, respectively. Moreover, the ROC curve analysis showed AUC values of 0.77 for PAX1 methylation and 0.86 for SEPT9 methylation tests, which were significantly superior to other commonly used tests. These findings suggest that PAX1 and SEPT9 methylation detection may have great clinical potential in cervical cancer screening.What the results of this study add? The rates and levels of PAX1 and SEPT9 methylation increased with the severity of the cervical lesions. For a diagnosis of cervical (pre)cancer, the area under the curve (AUC) of PAX1 methylation was 0.77 (95% CI 0.71-0.83), and the sensitivity and specificity values were 61.18% and 95.36%, respectively. The AUC value of the SEPT9 methylation was 0.86 (95% CI 0.81 ∼ 0.90), and the sensitivity and specificity values were 82.35% and 86.75%, respectively. Compared with the various tests we conducted, the PAX1 methylation showed the highest specificity (95.36%), and the SEPT9 methylation demonstrated the highest accuracy(86.00%).What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The methylation levels of PAX1 and SEPT9 had a certain predictive effect on the severity of cervical lesions in hrHPV-positive women. In addition, SEPT9 methylation analysis performs better than PAX1 methylation analysis and commonly used tests in cervical exfoliated cells for detecting cervical (pre)cancer in hrHPV-positive women. SEPT9 methylation analysis merits consideration as an effective and objective, alternative triage test in HPV-based cervical (pre)cancer screening programs.

Utilization of PAX1 methylation test for cervical cancer screening of non-HPV16/18 high-risk HPV infection in women

Aim: To evaluate the clinical performance of PAX1 methylation (PAX1m) and cytology for patients with non-HPV16/18 high-risk HPV (hrHPV) infection. Methods: Cervical exfoliated cells from 387 outpatients with non-HPV16/18 hrHPV - positive were collected for cytology and PAX1m assays. Results: The PAX1m level increased with the severity of cytology and histopathology. For cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)CIN2+/CIN3+, the areas under the curve were both 0.87. The specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of PAX1m were greater than abnormal cytology (CIN2+ specificity: 75.5 vs 24.8%; PPV: 38.8 vs 18.7%; CIN3+ specificity: 69.3 vs 22.7%; PPV: 14.0 vs 6.7%). Conclusion: PAX1m increased specificity and PPV for CIN2+/CIN3+ compared with cytology for women with non-HPV16/18 hrHPV (+).

Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) as the Prognostic Factor for Recurrence/Residual Disease in HSIL Patients After LEEP

Purpose

The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) is considered correlated with cancer prognosis including cervical cancer, in addition to high-risk papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection, of which the predictive value in prognosis of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) remains unknown. Here, the prognostic predictive value of PLR in HSIL after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) was evaluated.

Patients and Methods

This study included 335 nonpregnant participants with histopathologically confirmed HSIL and 3- and 5-year follow-ups from the Fujian Cervical Lesions Screening Cohorts (FCLSCs) between September 2016 and September 2018. PLR and other variables were evaluated to identify the factors related to the recurrence/residual cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)-free survival (RFS), namely, the time from LEEP at baseline to first detection of recurrence/residual CIN or end of follow-up, by logistic and Cox regression.

Results

In the Kaplan‒Meier analysis, HR-HPV infection (p=0.049/0.012), higher PLR (p=0.031/0.038), and gland invasion (p=0.047) had a higher risk for recurrence/residual CIN at the 3-/5-year follow-up. The univariate logistic and Cox regression analyses showed significant differences and a higher cumulative risk in patients with HR-HPV infection (OR=3.917, p=0.026; HR=3.996, p=0.020) and higher PLR (OR=2.295, p=0.041; HR=2.161, p=0.030) at the 5-year follow-up. The findings by multivariate Cox regression analysis were similar, indicating a poor prognosis for patients with HR-HPV infection (HR=3.901, p=0.023) and higher PLR (HR=2.082, p=0.038) at the 5-year follow-up. The calibration plot showed a better model fit for RFS at the 3-year follow-up.

Conclusion

Preoperative PLR level and HR-HPV infection could be available markers for predicting recurrence/residual disease of HSIL after LEEP. Clinically, combining PLR with HR-HPV tests may provide novel evaluation method and reference for management in post-treatment patients with cervical precancerous lesions.

Clinical value of the ThinPrep cytologic test with E6/E7 mRNA detection for cervical cancer screening in disease diagnosis

BACKGROUND

To investigate the clinical value of the ThinPrep cytologic test (TCT) with the E6/E7 mRNA test for cervical cancer screening in disease diagnosis.

METHODS

A total of 405 samples from Dazhou Central Hospital from April 2017 to July 2020 were collected, and we conducted a comparative analysis of the diagnostic performance of several test methods both individually andcombination.

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) were compared by single TCT, E6/E7 mRNA test, and combination methods. The TCT+E6/E7mRNA test was confirmed to have a relatively higher specificity of 80.32% (95% CI: 75.40%-84.48%, both P < 0.001), and AUC value (0.78, 95% CI: 0.73-0.83, and P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The relative diagnostic value may be further improved by the combined detection of TCT and E6/E7 mRNA test. The combined detection of TCT and the E6/E7 mRNA test is expected to become a potential indicator for cervical lesions.