Incidence and Characteristics of Late Catch-Up Phenomenon Between Sirolimus-Eluting Stent and Everolimus-Eluting Stent: A Propensity Matched Study

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Among Various Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategies for Small Coronary Artery Disease

It remains unclear which percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategy is the most preferable in patients with small-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD). We sought to evaluate the clinical efficacy of various PCI strategies for patients with small-vessel CAD through a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We searched multiple databases for RCTs investigating the efficacy of the following PCI strategies for small-vessel CAD (<3 mm in diameter): drug-coated balloons (DCB), early-generation paclitaxel-eluting stents and sirolimus-eluting stents (SES), newer-generation drug-eluting stents (DES), bare-metal stents (BMS), cutting balloon angioplasty, and balloon angioplasty (BA). The primary outcome was the trial-defined major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), mostly defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization. The secondary outcomes included each component of MACE and angiographic binary restenosis. We performed a sensitivity analysis for RCTs without BMS or first-generation DES. Our search identified 29 eligible RCTs, including 8,074 patients among the 8 PCI strategies. SES significantly reduced MACE compared with BA (hazard ratio 0.23, 95% confidence interval 0.10 to 0.54) with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 55.9%), and the rankogram analysis showed that SES was the best. There were no significant differences between DCB and newer-generation DES in any clinical outcomes, which was consistent in the sensitivity analysis. BMS and BA were ranked as the worst 2 for most clinical outcomes. In conclusion, SES was ranked as the best for reducing MACE. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between DCB and newer-generation DES. BMS and BA were regarded as the worst strategies for small-vessel CAD.

Scoring model to predict low image quality of drug-eluting stent evaluated by computed tomography coronary angiography

Evaluation of in-stent restenosis (ISR) by computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) is less invasive but often impossible. We aimed to create a scoring model for predicting which drug-eluting stents (DES) cannot be evaluated with CTCA. We enrolled 757 consecutive implanted DES assessed with CTCA. Non-diagnostic evaluation was defined as poor/not evaluative by two different observers. These stents were randomly divided into a derivation (n = 379) and validation (n = 378) group. In the derivation group, we assessed predictors using logistic regression analysis and created a scoring model that would stratify non-diagnostic evaluation of DES-ISR. The validity of this scoring model was evaluated in the validation group using receiver-operating characteristic analysis. The percentage of non-diagnostic stents was 19/21% in the derivation/validation group (p = 0.71). Non-diagnostic evaluation was independently associated with implanted stent diameter (2.25-2.5. vs. 2.5-3 vs. > 3.0 mm), severe calcification, stent-in-stent lesion, and type of DES (stainless vs. CoCr vs. PtCr) in the derivation group. The predicting system of implanted DES non-diagnostic by CTCA (PIDENT) for non-diagnostic evaluation, including these four baseline factors, was derived (C-statistic = 0.86 in derivation group, cutoff: 8 points). The PIDENT score had a high predictive value for non-diagnostic DES in the validation model (C-statistic = 0.87, sensitivity 86%, specificity 74%, cutoff 8 points, p < 0.001). The PIDENT score, consisting of baseline characteristics including implanted stent diameter, severe calcification, stent-in-stent lesion, and type of DES, could identify non-diagnostic evaluation of DES-ISR with CTCA. The PIDENT score was valuable in reducing nonevaluable and meaningless CTCA for DES-ISR.

Clinical outcomes in unselected patients treated with the PROMUS Element platinum-chromium, everolimus-eluting stent: Final five-year results from the PE PROVE Study

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this analysis was to evaluate the final 5-year safety and effectiveness of the PROMUS Element platinum-chromium everolimus-eluting stent in unselected patients treated in routine clinical practice.

BACKGROUND

The prospective, open-label PROMUS Element™ European Post-Approval Surveillance Study (PE-PROVE) enrolled 1,010 "real-world" patients who received the PROMUS Element stent. Adverse event rates were low at 1-year, and the incidence of stent thrombosis was 0.6%.

METHODS

The primary endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF; overall and PE stent-related), a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) related to the target vessel, or target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 1-year post-implantation. Five-year clinical outcomes were evaluated in overall as well as high-risk patient subgroups.

RESULTS

The overall 5-year TVF rate was 14.9%, with 7.0% being related to the study stent. Cardiac death, MI and TVR related to the study stent occurred in 0.5%, 3.2%, and 5.7%, respectively. Stent thrombosis through 5-year follow-up was 1.0%. The rates of overall and study stent related TVF were numerically higher in patients with medically treated diabetes, long lesions (≥28 mm), and small diameter vessels (≤2.5 mm) compared to the overall study population. Additionally, favorable stent thrombosis rates through 5 years were reported for the PROMUS Element stent in these high-risk subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

The final 5-year data from the PE-PROVE study demonstrate favorable outcomes and low rates of adverse events with the PE stent when used in "real-world" patients with coronary artery disease.

Extracting information from free-text electronic patient records to identify practice-based evidence of the performance of coronary stents

Background and objective

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using drug-eluting stents (DES) is an indispensable treatment for coronary artery disease. However, to evaluate the performance of various types of stents for PCI, numerous resources are required. We extracted clinical information from free-text records and, using practice-based evidence, compared the efficacy of various DES.

Materials and methods

We developed a text mining tool based on regular expression and applied it to PCI reports stored in the electronic health records (EHRs) of Ajou University Hospital from 2010–2014. The PCI data were extracted from EHRs with a sensitivity of 0.996, a specificity of 1.000, and an F-measure of 0.995 when compared with a sample of 200 reports. Using these data, we compared the performance of stents by Kaplan-Meier analysis and the Cox hazard proportional regression.

Results

In the self-validation analysis comparing the first-generation to the second-generation DES, the second-generation DES was superior to the first-generation DES (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.423, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.284–0.630) in terms of target vessel revascularization (TVR), showing similar findings to the established results of previous studies. Among the second-generation DES, the biodegradable-polymer DES tended to be superior, with a risk of TVR (HR: 0.568, 95% CI: 0.281–1.147) falling below than that for the durable-polymer DES approximately 1 year after the index procedure. The Endeavor stent had the highest TVR risk among the newer generation DES (HR: 2.576, 95% CI: 1.273–5.210).

Conclusions

In this study, we demonstrated how to construct a PCI data warehouse of PCI-related parameters obtained from free-text electronic records with high accuracy for use in the post surveillance of coronary stents in a time- and cost effective manner. Post surveillance of the practice based evidence in the PCI data warehouse indicated that the biodegradable-polymer DES might have a lower risk of TVR than the durable-polymer DES.

Incidence and Long-Term Clinical Impact of Late-Acquired Stent Fracture After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation in Narrowed Coronary Arteries

The incidence and long-term clinical impact of stent fracture (SF) occurred beyond 1 year after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation remains unclear. From April 2004 to March 2008, 985 consecutive patients with 1,307 lesions were treated only with SES. Of these, 868 patients (88.1%) with 1,140 lesions underwent follow-up angiography within 1 year after the index procedure, and 646 patients (65.6%) with 872 lesions underwent it both within and beyond 1 year after the index procedure. According to the diagnosed timing of SF, we divided the patients into the 2 groups: early SF (<1 year after the index procedure) and late-acquired SF (>1 year after the index procedure). Early- and late-acquired SFs were observed in 64 of 868 patients (7.4%) and 66 of 1,140 lesions (5.8%); 12 of 646 patients (1.9%) and 12 of 872 lesions (1.4%), respectively. Cumulative 10-year incidence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization and definite stent thrombosis were numerically higher in the early- and late-acquired SF groups than in the non-SF group (41.6% vs 45.5% vs 19.0%; 8.0% vs 8.3% vs 2.0%, respectively). In conclusion, late-acquired SF after SES implantation occurred in 1.4% of lesions, which was lower than that of early SF. However, both early- and late-acquired SFs appeared to be associated with clinically driven target lesion revascularization and stent thrombosis during the long-term follow-up.

Incidence and predictors of early and late target lesion revascularization after everolimus-eluting stent implantation in unselected patients in japan

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to clarify the incidence and predictors of early and late target lesion revascularization (TLR) after everolimus-eluting stent (EES) implantation in actual clinical practice.

BACKGROUND

Several clinical studies have reported the incidence and predictors of TLR after EES implantation. However, detailed features of early and late TLR are unknown.

METHODS

We analyzed the clinical data of patients who underwent EES implantation between January 2010 and December 2011 at 22 institutions in Japan (Tokyo-MD PCI study). Patients who underwent ischemia-driven TLR (ID-TLR) were grouped according to the number of years elapsed since stent placement, and incidence and correlations between clinical factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis was performed for 1,899 patients and 2,305 lesions. The mean age was 70.0 ± 9.9 years, and the median follow-up period was 1,281 days (IQR: 762-1,440 days). The incidence of ID-TLR was 2.7% at 1 year and 5.4% at 4 years. After 2 years, the ID-TLR rates plateaued. The independent predictors of ID-TLR occurring within 2 years were hemodialysis, triple vessel disease, restenotic lesion, and ostial lesions. The independent predictors of ID-TLR between 2 and 4 years were diabetes mellitus and peripheral artery disease.

CONCLUSION

The ID-TLR rates leveled off after 2 years. Furthermore, the predictors of ID-TLR that occurred within 2 years of EES implantation differed from those that occurred later than 2 years. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.