Thrombectomy of Ventricular Assist Device-Originated Embolic Stroke: A Clinical Decision Model

Efficacy and safety of mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke and left ventricular assist device: review of the literature and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are used as definitive therapy or as a bridge to heart transplant in patients with advanced heart failure. Thromboembolic complications such as acute ischemic stroke (AIS) are common among patients with LVAD support. This study aims to evaluate the current evidence on the efficacy and safety of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with AIS due to large vessel occlusions (LVO) and LVAD-support.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic review was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus to find observational studies with reports of ≥5 MTs in adult patients with LVAD support (PROSPERO registration code CRD42024597541). Rates of successful and complete reperfusion, favorable functional outcomes at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2 or equal to pre-stroke mRS), mortality at 90 days, any intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and symptomatic ICH (sICH) were pooled using generalized linear mixed models.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included with data from 51 patients and 62 MTs. The rate of successful reperfusion was 87.4% (95% CI 62.5% to 96.6%) and complete reperfusion rate was 57.3% (95% CI 35.1% to 76.9%). Rate of favorable functional recovery was 62.5% (95% CI 42.2% to 79.2%). Rate of sICH was 6.4% (95% CI 0.9% to 34.0%). Mortality rate was 16.7% (95% CI 7.1% to 34.7%). Between 25-40% of patients who were waiting for a heart transplant before their stroke received a heart transplant after MT.

CONCLUSIONS

MT for the emergent treatment of AIS in the setting of LVAD is relatively safe and efficacious for achieving successful reperfusion and good functional recovery.

Catheter thrombectomy for basilar artery stroke immediately after insertion of durable left ventricular assist device

Background: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is a serious complication associated with device morbidity. AIS development following LVAD placement typically presents between 6- and 24-months post implantation.Case/Results: We report a case of a 67-year-old male who initially presented with reduced ejection fraction and severe coronary vessel disease. Following coronary artery bypass graft surgery, the patient remained in a low output state necessitating placement of an LVAD device. Approximately 4.5 hours following LVAD implantation, a severe acute decrease in mental status revealed new development of ischemic stroke of the basilar artery, which was successfully treated in one pass with catheter endovascular thrombectomy.Conclusion: While embolic stroke management in these cases remains difficult as patients are usually anticoagulated, our case demonstrates the utilization of endovascular thrombectomy as a viable therapeutic option in the setting of an uncommon occurrence of embolic stroke in the hours following LVAD implantation.

Bleeding risk in patients with cardiac disease from ischaemic stroke reperfusion therapy: an update

Background

Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) and arterial endovascular therapy (ET) rapidly restore cerebral perfusion in eligible patients who had an acute ischaemic stroke (AIS). It is unknown whether patients who had an AIS with premorbid cardiac disease respond differently to reperfusion therapies than those without. These patients may have risk factors that worsen outcomes or may represent those who would most benefit from reperfusion therapy.

Objective

To determine whether patients who had an AIS with the most frequently encountered pre-existing cardiac conditions, atrial fibrillation (AF), heart failure (HF), left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), or taking anticoagulation for cardiac indications, are at increased risk for poor outcome, such as symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH), after reperfusion therapy.

Results

Although AF is an independent risk factor for poor poststroke outcomes, intravenous rtPA is not associated with increased risk of sICH for those not on anticoagulants. Likewise, HF is independently associated with mortality post stroke, yet these patients benefit from reperfusion therapies without increased rates of sICH. Patients with LVADs or who are on anticoagulation should not be given IV rtPA; however, ET remains a viable option in those who meet criteria, even patients with LVAD.

Conclusion

There is no evidence of an increased risk for sICH after intravenous rtPA or ET for those with AF or HF. Intravenous rtPA should not be given to patients on anticoagulation or with LVADs, but ET should be offered to them when eligible. Whenever possible, future AIS reperfusion research should include patients with premorbid cardiac disease as they are frequently excluded, representing a gap in evidence.

Late Pediatric Mechanical Thrombectomy for Embolic Stroke as Bridge Reinforcement From LVAD to Heart Transplantation

Although the left ventricular assist device is an important bridge to heart transplantation for patients with end-stage heart failure, it can also be a source of embolic stroke. We present a case of late intracranial mechanical thrombectomy performed for embolic stroke beyond the recommended 6 h, thus allowing for heart transplantation 4 days after intracranial mechanical thrombectomy. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.)