1
|
Ruder AM, Mohamed SA, Hoesl MAU, Neumaier-Probst E, Giordano FA, Schad L, Adlung A. Radiosurgery-induced early changes in peritumoral tissue sodium concentration of brain metastases. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0313199. [PMID: 39495788 PMCID: PMC11534259 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 10/22/2024] [Indexed: 11/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an effective therapy for brain metastases. Response is assessed with serial 1H magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Early markers for response are desirable to allow for individualized treatment adaption. Previous studies indicated that radiotherapy might have impact on tissue sodium concentration. Thus, 23Na MRI could provide early quantification of response to SRS. PURPOSE We investigated whether longitudinal detection of tissue sodium concentration alteration within brain metastases and their peritumoral tissue after SRS with 23Na MRI was feasible. STUDY TYPE Prospective. POPULATION Twelve patients with a total of 14 brain metastases from various primary tumors. ASSESSMENT 23Na MRI scans were acquired from patients 2 days before, 5 days after, and 40 days after SRS. Gross tumor volume (GTV) and healthy-appearing regions were manually segmented on the MPRAGE obtained 2 days before SRS, onto which all 23Na MR images were coregistered. Radiation isodose areas within the peritumoral tissue were calculated with the radiation planning system. Tissue sodium concentration before and after SRS within GTV, peritumoral tissue, and healthy-appearing regions as well as the routine follow-up with serial MRI were evaluated. STATISTICAL TESTS Results were compared using Student's t-test and correlation was evaluated with Pearson's correlation coefficient. RESULTS We found a positive correlation between the tissue sodium concentration within the peritumoral tissue and radiation dosage. Two patients showed local progression and a differing tissue sodium concentration evolution within GTV and the peritumoral tissue compared to mean tissue sodium concentration of the other patients. No significant tissue sodium concentration changes were observed within healthy-appearing regions. CONCLUSION Tissue sodium concentration assessment within brain metastases and peritumoral tissue after SRS with 23Na MRI is feasible and might be able to quantify tissue response to radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arne Mathias Ruder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Sherif A. Mohamed
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Michaela A. U. Hoesl
- Computer Assisted Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Eva Neumaier-Probst
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Frank A. Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Lothar Schad
- Computer Assisted Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Anne Adlung
- Computer Assisted Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pandey S, Kutuk T, Abdalah MA, Stringfield O, Ravi H, Mills MN, Graham JA, Latifi K, Moreno WA, Ahmed KA, Raghunand N. Prediction of radiologic outcome-optimized dose plans and post-treatment magnetic resonance images: A proof-of-concept study in breast cancer brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 31:100602. [PMID: 39040435 PMCID: PMC11261135 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Information in multiparametric Magnetic Resonance (mpMR) images is relatable to voxel-level tumor response to Radiation Treatment (RT). We have investigated a deep learning framework to predict (i) post-treatment mpMR images from pre-treatment mpMR images and the dose map ("forward models"), and, (ii) the RT dose map that will produce prescribed changes within the Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) on post-treatment mpMR images ("inverse model"), in Breast Cancer Metastases to the Brain (BCMB) treated with Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS). Materials and methods Local outcomes, planning computed tomography (CT) images, dose maps, and pre-treatment and post-treatment Apparent Diffusion Coefficient of water (ADC) maps, T1-weighted unenhanced (T1w) and contrast-enhanced (T1wCE), T2-weighted (T2w) and Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) mpMR images were curated from 39 BCMB patients. mpMR images were co-registered to the planning CT and intensity-calibrated. A 2D pix2pix architecture was used to train 5 forward models (ADC, T2w, FLAIR, T1w, T1wCE) and 1 inverse model on 1940 slices from 18 BCMB patients, and tested on 437 slices from another 9 BCMB patients. Results Root Mean Square Percent Error (RMSPE) within the GTV between predicted and ground-truth post-RT images for the 5 forward models, in 136 test slices containing GTV, were (mean ± SD) 0.12 ± 0.044 (ADC), 0.14 ± 0.066 (T2w), 0.08 ± 0.038 (T1w), 0.13 ± 0.058 (T1wCE), and 0.09 ± 0.056 (FLAIR). RMSPE within the GTV on the same 136 test slices, between the predicted and ground-truth dose maps, was 0.37 ± 0.20 for the inverse model. Conclusions A deep learning-based approach for radiologic outcome-optimized dose planning in SRS of BCMB has been demonstrated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shraddha Pandey
- Department of Cancer Physiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
- Department of Electrical Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Tugce Kutuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Mahmoud A. Abdalah
- Quantitative Imaging Shared Service, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Olya Stringfield
- Quantitative Imaging Shared Service, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Harshan Ravi
- Department of Cancer Physiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Matthew N. Mills
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Jasmine A. Graham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Kujtim Latifi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Wilfrido A. Moreno
- Department of Electrical Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Kamran A. Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Natarajan Raghunand
- Department of Cancer Physiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mesny E, Leporq B, Chapet O, Beuf O. Intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging to assess early tumor response to radiation therapy: Review and future directions. Magn Reson Imaging 2024; 108:129-137. [PMID: 38354843 DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2024.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
Early prediction of radiation response by imaging is a dynamic field of research and it can be obtained using a variety of noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging methods. Recently, intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) has gained interest in cancer imaging. IVIM carries both diffusion and perfusion information, making it a promising tool to assess tumor response. Here, we briefly introduced the basics of IVIM, reviewed existing studies of IVIM in various type of tumors during radiotherapy in order to show whether IVIM is a useful technique for an early assessment of radiation response. 31/40 studies reported an increase of IVIM parameters during radiotherapy compared to baseline. In 27 studies, this increase was higher in patients with good response to radiotherapy. Future directions including implementation of IVIM on MR-Linac and its limitation are discussed. Obtaining new radiologic biomarkers of radiotherapy response could open the way for a more personalized, biology-guided radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuel Mesny
- Radiation Oncology Department, Center Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Benite, France; Univ Lyon, INSA-Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, Inserm, CREATIS UMR 5220, U1294, Lyon F-69100, France.
| | - Benjamin Leporq
- Univ Lyon, INSA-Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, Inserm, CREATIS UMR 5220, U1294, Lyon F-69100, France
| | - Olivier Chapet
- Radiation Oncology Department, Center Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Benite, France
| | - Olivier Beuf
- Univ Lyon, INSA-Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, Inserm, CREATIS UMR 5220, U1294, Lyon F-69100, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dobeson CB, Birkbeck M, Bhatnagar P, Hall J, Pearson R, West S, English P, Butteriss D, Perthen J, Lewis J. Perfusion MRI in the evaluation of brain metastases: current practice review and rationale for study of baseline MR perfusion imaging prior to stereotactic radiosurgery (STARBEAM-X). Br J Radiol 2023; 96:20220462. [PMID: 37660364 PMCID: PMC10646666 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20220462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery is an established focal treatment for brain metastases with high local control rates. An important side-effect of stereotactic radiosurgery is the development of radionecrosis. On conventional MR imaging, radionecrosis and tumour progression often have similar appearances, but have contrasting management approaches. Perfusion MR imaging is often used in the post-treatment setting in order to help distinguish between the two, but image interpretation can be fraught with challenges.Perfusion MR plays an established role in the baseline and post-treatment evaluation of primary brain tumours and a number of studies have concentrated on the value of perfusion imaging in brain metastases. Of the parameters generated, relative cerebral blood volume is the most widely used variable in terms of its clinical value in differentiating between radionecrosis and tumour progression. Although it has been suggested that the relative cerebral blood volume tends to be elevated in active metastatic disease following treatment with radiosurgery, but not with treatment-related changes, the literature available on interpretation of the ratios provided in the context of defining tumour progression is not consistent.This article aims to provide an overview of the role perfusion MRI plays in the assessment of brain metastases and introduces the rationale for the STARBEAM-X study (Study of assessment of radionecrosis in brain metastases using MR perfusion extra imaging), which will prospectively evaluate baseline perfusion imaging in brain metastases. We hope this will allow insight into the vascular appearance of metastases from different primary sites, and aid in the interpretation of post-treatment perfusion imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Matthew Birkbeck
- Northern Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Priya Bhatnagar
- Department of Neuroradiology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Julie Hall
- Department of Neuroradiology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Rachel Pearson
- Department of Oncology, Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Serena West
- Department of Oncology, Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Philip English
- Department of Neuroradiology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - David Butteriss
- Department of Neuroradiology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Joanna Perthen
- Department of Neuroradiology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Joanne Lewis
- Department of Oncology, Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
LoCastro E, Paudyal R, Konar AS, LaViolette PS, Akin O, Hatzoglou V, Goh AC, Bochner BH, Rosenberg J, Wong RJ, Lee NY, Schwartz LH, Shukla-Dave A. A Quantitative Multiparametric MRI Analysis Platform for Estimation of Robust Imaging Biomarkers in Clinical Oncology. Tomography 2023; 9:2052-2066. [PMID: 37987347 PMCID: PMC10661267 DOI: 10.3390/tomography9060161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023] Open
Abstract
There is a need to develop user-friendly imaging tools estimating robust quantitative biomarkers (QIBs) from multiparametric (mp)MRI for clinical applications in oncology. Quantitative metrics derived from (mp)MRI can monitor and predict early responses to treatment, often prior to anatomical changes. We have developed a vendor-agnostic, flexible, and user-friendly MATLAB-based toolkit, MRI-Quantitative Analysis and Multiparametric Evaluation Routines ("MRI-QAMPER", current release v3.0), for the estimation of quantitative metrics from dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) and multi-b value diffusion-weighted (DW) MR and MR relaxometry. MRI-QAMPER's functionality includes generating numerical parametric maps from these methods reflecting tumor permeability, cellularity, and tissue morphology. MRI-QAMPER routines were validated using digital reference objects (DROs) for DCE and DW MRI, serving as initial approval stages in the National Cancer Institute Quantitative Imaging Network (NCI/QIN) software benchmark. MRI-QAMPER has participated in DCE and DW MRI Collaborative Challenge Projects (CCPs), which are key technical stages in the NCI/QIN benchmark. In a DCE CCP, QAMPER presented the best repeatability coefficient (RC = 0.56) across test-retest brain metastasis data, out of ten participating DCE software packages. In a DW CCP, QAMPER ranked among the top five (out of fourteen) tools with the highest area under the curve (AUC) for prostate cancer detection. This platform can seamlessly process mpMRI data from brain, head and neck, thyroid, prostate, pancreas, and bladder cancer. MRI-QAMPER prospectively analyzes dose de-escalation trial data for oropharyngeal cancer, which has earned it advanced NCI/QIN approval for expanded usage and applications in wider clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eve LoCastro
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (E.L.); (R.P.); (A.S.K.)
| | - Ramesh Paudyal
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (E.L.); (R.P.); (A.S.K.)
| | - Amaresha Shridhar Konar
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (E.L.); (R.P.); (A.S.K.)
| | - Peter S. LaViolette
- Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA;
| | - Oguz Akin
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (O.A.); (V.H.); (L.H.S.)
| | - Vaios Hatzoglou
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (O.A.); (V.H.); (L.H.S.)
| | - Alvin C. Goh
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (A.C.G.); (B.H.B.); (R.J.W.)
| | - Bernard H. Bochner
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (A.C.G.); (B.H.B.); (R.J.W.)
| | - Jonathan Rosenberg
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Richard J. Wong
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (A.C.G.); (B.H.B.); (R.J.W.)
| | - Nancy Y. Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Lawrence H. Schwartz
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (O.A.); (V.H.); (L.H.S.)
| | - Amita Shukla-Dave
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (E.L.); (R.P.); (A.S.K.)
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (O.A.); (V.H.); (L.H.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Eraky AM. Radiological Biomarkers for Brain Metastases Prognosis: Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Modalities As Non-invasive Biomarkers for the Effect of Radiotherapy. Cureus 2023; 15:e38353. [PMID: 37266043 PMCID: PMC10229388 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.38353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy effect is achieved by its ability to cause DNA damage and induce apoptosis. In contrast, radiation can induce tumor cells' proliferation, invasiveness, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Besides developing radioresistance, this paradoxical effect of radiotherapy is considered a challenging problem in the field of radiotherapy. This highlights the importance of developing new modalities to diagnose radioresistance early to avoid any unnecessary exposure to radiation and differentiate between metastases recurrence versus post-radiation changes. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC), arterial spin labeling (ASL), and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) represent potential biomarkers to diagnose metastases recurrence and radioresistance. In this review, we will focus on recent studies discussing the possibility of using DWI, DSC, ASL, and DCE to diagnose radioresistance and recurrence in patients with brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akram M Eraky
- Neurological Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hu J, Xie X, Zhou W, Hu X, Sun X. The emerging potential of quantitative MRI biomarkers for the early prediction of brain metastasis response after stereotactic radiosurgery: a scoping review. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2023; 13:1174-1189. [PMID: 36819250 PMCID: PMC9929394 DOI: 10.21037/qims-22-412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Background At present, the simple prognostic models based on clinical information for predicting the treatment outcomes of brain metastases (BMs) are subjective and delayed. Thus, we performed this systematic review of multiple studies to assess the potential of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers for the early prediction of treatment outcomes of brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Methods We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Clinical Trials.gov databases for articles published between February 1, 1991, and April 11, 2022, with no language restrictions. We included studies involving patients with BMs receiving SRS; the included patients were required to have definite pathology of a primary tumor and complete imaging data (pre- and post-SRS). We excluded the articles that included patients who had undergone previous surgery and those that did not include regular follow-up or corresponding MRI scans. Results We identified 2,162 studies, of which 26 were included in our analysis, involving a total of 1,362 participants. All 26 studies explored the relevant MRI parameters to predict the prognosis of patients with BMs who received SRS. The outcomes were generalized according to the relationships between the anatomical/morphological, microstructural, vascular, and metabolic changes and SRS. Generally, with traditional MRI, there are several quantitative prognostic models based on preradiosurgical radiomics that predict the outcome of SRS treatment in local BM control. With the implementation of advanced MRI, the relative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), perfusion fraction (f), relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), relative regional cerebral blood flow (rrCBF), interstitial fluid pressure (IFP), quadratic of time-dependent leakage (Ktrans 2), extracellular extravascular volume (ve), choline/creatine (Cho/Cr), nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) peak, and intraextracellular water exchange rate constant (kIE ) were confirmed to be indicative of the therapeutic effect of SRS for BMs. Conclusions Quantitative MRI biomarkers extracted from traditional or advanced MRI at different time points, which can represent the anatomical/morphological, microstructural, vascular, and metabolic changes, respectively, have been proposed as promising markers for the early prediction of SRS response in those with BMs. There are some limitations in this review, including the risk of selection bias, the limited number of study objects, the incomparability of the total data, and the subjectivity of the review process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiamiao Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xuyun Xie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Weiwen Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiao Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiaonan Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hristov D, Mustonen L, von Eyben R, Gotschel S, Minion M, El Kaffas A. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Modeling of an Analog to Pseudo-Diffusivity in Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Magnetic Resonance Imaging. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING 2022; 41:3824-3834. [PMID: 35939460 PMCID: PMC10101718 DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2022.3197363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Tumor perfusion and vascular properties are important determinants of cancer response to therapy and thus various approaches for imaging perfusion are being explored. In particular, Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) MRI has been actively researched as an alternative to Dynamic-Contrast-Enhanced (DCE) CT and DCE-MRI as it offers non-ionizing, non-contrast-based perfusion imaging. However, for repetitive treatment assessment in a short time period, high cost, limited access, and inability to scan at the bedside remain disadvantages of IVIM MRI. We propose an analysis framework that may enable 3D DCE Ultrasound (DCE-US) - low cost, bedside imaging with excellent safety record - as an alternative modality to IVIM MRI for the generation of DCE-US based pseudo-diffusivity maps in acoustically accessible anatomy and tumors. Modelling intravascular contrast propagation as a convective-diffusive process, we reconstruct parametric maps of pseudo-diffusivity by solving a large-scale fully coupled inverse problem without any assumptions regarding local constancy of the reconstructed parameters. In a mouse tumor model, we demonstrate that the 3D DCE-US pseudo-diffusivity is repeatable, sensitive to treatment with an antiangiogenic agent, and moderately correlated to histological measures of perfusion and angiogenesis.
Collapse
|
9
|
Quantitative Relaxometry Metrics for Brain Metastases Compared to Normal Tissues: A Pilot MR Fingerprinting Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14225606. [PMID: 36428699 PMCID: PMC9688653 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14225606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of the present pilot study was to estimate T1 and T2 metric values derived simultaneously from a new, rapid Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (MRF) technique, as well as to assess their ability to characterize-brain metastases (BM) and normal-appearing brain tissues. Fourteen patients with BM underwent MRI, including prototype MRF, on a 3T scanner. In total, 108 measurements were analyzed: 42 from solid parts of BM's (21 each on T1 and T2 maps) and 66 from normal-appearing brain tissue (11 ROIs each on T1 and T2 maps for gray matter [GM], white matter [WM], and cerebrospinal fluid [CSF]). The BM's mean T1 and T2 values differed significantly from normal-appearing WM (p < 0.05). The mean T1 values from normal-appearing GM, WM, and CSF regions were 1205 ms, 840 ms, and 4233 ms, respectively. The mean T2 values were 108 ms, 78 ms, and 442 ms, respectively. The mean T1 and T2 values for untreated BM (n = 4) were 2035 ms and 168 ms, respectively. For treated BM (n = 17) the T1 and T2 values were 2163 ms and 141 ms, respectively. MRF technique appears to be a promising and rapid quantitative method for the characterization of free water content and tumor morphology in BMs.
Collapse
|
10
|
Hasanov E, Yeboa DN, Tucker MD, Swanson TA, Beckham TH, Rini B, Ene CI, Hasanov M, Derks S, Smits M, Dudani S, Heng DYC, Brastianos PK, Bex A, Hanalioglu S, Weinberg JS, Hirsch L, Carlo MI, Aizer A, Brown PD, Bilen MA, Chang EL, Jaboin J, Brugarolas J, Choueiri TK, Atkins MB, McGregor BA, Halasz LM, Patel TR, Soltys SG, McDermott DF, Elder JB, Baskaya MK, Yu JB, Timmerman R, Kim MM, Mut M, Markert J, Beal K, Tannir NM, Samandouras G, Lang FF, Giles R, Jonasch E. An interdisciplinary consensus on the management of brain metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin 2022; 72:454-489. [PMID: 35708940 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases are a challenging manifestation of renal cell carcinoma. We have a limited understanding of brain metastasis tumor and immune biology, drivers of resistance to systemic treatment, and their overall poor prognosis. Current data support a multimodal treatment strategy with radiation treatment and/or surgery. Nonetheless, the optimal approach for the management of brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma remains unclear. To improve patient care, the authors sought to standardize practical management strategies. They performed an unstructured literature review and elaborated on the current management strategies through an international group of experts from different disciplines assembled via the network of the International Kidney Cancer Coalition. Experts from different disciplines were administered a survey to answer questions related to current challenges and unmet patient needs. On the basis of the integrated approach of literature review and survey study results, the authors built algorithms for the management of single and multiple brain metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma. The literature review, consensus statements, and algorithms presented in this report can serve as a framework guiding treatment decisions for patients. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:454-489.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elshad Hasanov
- Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Debra Nana Yeboa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Mathew D Tucker
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Todd A Swanson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Thomas Hendrix Beckham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Brian Rini
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Chibawanye I Ene
- Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Merve Hasanov
- Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sophie Derks
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Shaan Dudani
- Division of Oncology/Hematology, William Osler Health System, Brampton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel Y C Heng
- Tom Baker Cancer Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Priscilla K Brastianos
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Axel Bex
- The Royal Free London National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- University College London Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sahin Hanalioglu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Jeffrey S Weinberg
- Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Laure Hirsch
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cochin University Hospital, Public Assistance Hospital of Paris, Paris, France
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Maria I Carlo
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ayal Aizer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Paul David Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Mehmet Asim Bilen
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Eric Lin Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, California, Los Angeles
| | - Jerry Jaboin
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - James Brugarolas
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael B Atkins
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Bradley A McGregor
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lia M Halasz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Toral R Patel
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Scott G Soltys
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California
| | - David F McDermott
- Division of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - James Bradley Elder
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Mustafa K Baskaya
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - James B Yu
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Robert Timmerman
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Michelle Miran Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Melike Mut
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - James Markert
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Kathryn Beal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nizar M Tannir
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - George Samandouras
- Victor Horsley Department of Neurosurgery, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom
- University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom
| | - Frederick F Lang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Rachel Giles
- International Kidney Cancer Coalition, Duivendrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Eric Jonasch
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Analysis of Key Clinical Variables and Radiological Manifestations Associated with the Treatment Response of Patients with Brain Metastases to Stereotactic Radiosurgery. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11154529. [PMID: 35956144 PMCID: PMC9369562 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11154529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is considered a promising treatment for brain metastases (BM) with better healing efficacy, relatively faster treatment time, and lower neurotoxicity, which can achieve local control rates above 70%. Although SRS improves the local control of BM, this may not translate into improvements in survival time. Thus, screening out the key factors influencing the treatment response to SRS, instead of the survival time following SRS, might be of more significance. This may assist doctors when making adjustments to treatment strategies for patients with BM. Methods: This is a retrospective review of 696 patients with BM who were treated with SRS at Huashan Hospital, Fudan University between June 2015 and February 2020. According to the patients’ treatment response to SRS, the patients were divided into an improved group (IG) and a progressive group (PG). The clinical data and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed pre- and post-treatment were collected for the two groups. Five clinical variables (gender, age, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), primary tumor type, and extracranial lesion control) and seven radiological manifestations (location, number, volume, maximum diameter, edema index (EI), diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) sequence signal, and enhanced pattern) were selected and compared. A stepwise regression analysis was performed in order to obtain the best prediction effect of a group of variables and their regression coefficients, and finally to build an SRS treatment response scoring model based on the coefficients. The performance of the model was evaluated by calculating the AUC and performing the Hosmer–Lemeshow test. Results: A total of 323 patients were enrolled in the study based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, including 209 patients in the IG and 114 patients in the PG. In the Chi-square test and t-test analysis, the significant p values of KPS, extracranial lesion control, volume, and EI were less than 0.05. Moreover, the cut-off values for volume and EI were 1801.145 mm3 and 3.835, respectively. The scoring model that was based on multivariate logistic regression coefficients performed better, achieving AUCs of 0.755 ± 0.062 and 0.780 ± 0.061 for the internal validation and validation cohorts, with p values of 0.168 and 0.073 for the Hosmer–Lemeshow test. Conclusions: KPS, extracranial lesion control, tumor volume, and EI had a certain correlation with the treatment response to SRS. Scoring models that are based on these variables can accurately predict the treatment response of patients with BM to SRS, thereby assisting doctors to make an appropriate first treatment strategy for patients with BM to a certain degree.
Collapse
|
12
|
Quantitative Synthetic Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Brain Metastases: A Feasibility Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14112651. [PMID: 35681631 PMCID: PMC9179589 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14112651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary This preliminary study aims to characterize brain metastases (BM) using T1 and T2 maps generated from newer, rapid, synthetic MRI (MAGnetic resonance image Compilation; MAGiC) in a clinical setting. In addition, synthetic MR could provide contrast images analogous to standard T1- and T2-weighted images. The reproducibility and repeatability of this method have been previously established for brain imaging. This study reports and analyzes the quantitative T1 and T2 values for 11 BM patients (17 BM lesions) with a total of 82 regions of interest (ROIs) delineated by an experienced neuroradiologist. The initial results, which need to be further validated in a larger patient cohort, demonstrated the ability of T1 and T2 metric values to characterize BMs and normal-appearing brain tissues. The T1 and T2 metrics could be potential surrogate biomarkers for BM free water content (cellularity) and tumor morphology, respectively. Abstract The present preliminary study aims to characterize brain metastases (BM) using T1 and T2 maps generated from newer, rapid, synthetic MRI (MAGnetic resonance image Compilation; MAGiC) in a clinical setting. We acquired synthetic MRI data from 11 BM patients on a 3T scanner. A multiple-dynamic multiple-echo (MDME) sequence was used for data acquisition and synthetic image reconstruction, including post-processing. MDME is a multi-contrast sequence that enables absolute quantification of physical tissue properties, including T1 and T2, independent of the scanner settings. In total, 82 regions of interest (ROIs) were analyzed, which were obtained from both normal-appearing brain tissue and BM lesions. The mean values obtained from the 48 normal-appearing brain tissue regions and 34 ROIs of BM lesions (T1 and T2) were analyzed using standard statistical methods. The mean T1 and T2 values were 1143 ms and 78 ms, respectively, for normal-appearing gray matter, 701 ms and 64 ms for white matter, and 4206 ms and 390 ms for cerebrospinal fluid. For untreated BMs, the mean T1 and T2 values were 1868 ms and 100 ms, respectively, and 2211 ms and 114 ms for the treated group. The quantitative T1 and T2 values generated from synthetic MRI can characterize BM and normal-appearing brain tissues.
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Imaging of brain metastases (BMs) has advanced greatly over the past decade. In this review, we discuss the main challenges that BMs pose in clinical practice and describe the role of imaging.Firstly, we describe the increased incidence of BMs of different primary tumours and the rationale for screening. A challenge lies in selecting the right patients for screening: not all cancer patients develop BMs in their disease course.Secondly, we discuss the imaging techniques to detect BMs. A three-dimensional (3D) T1W MRI sequence is the golden standard for BM detection, but additional anatomical (susceptibility weighted imaging, diffusion weighted imaging), functional (perfusion MRI) and metabolic (MR spectroscopy, positron emission tomography) information can help to differentiate BMs from other intracranial aetiologies.Thirdly, we describe the role of imaging before, during and after treatment of BMs. For surgical resection, imaging is used to select surgical patients, but also to assist intraoperatively (neuronavigation, fluorescence-guided surgery, ultrasound). For treatment planning of stereotactic radiosurgery, MRI is combined with CT. For surveillance after both local and systemic therapies, conventional MRI is used. However, advanced imaging is increasingly performed to distinguish true tumour progression from pseudoprogression.FInally, future perspectives are discussed, including radiomics, new biomarkers, new endogenous contrast agents and theranostics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie H A E Derks
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid A M van der Veldt
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|