1
|
Raab G, Babu C, Yu Y, Givi B, Wong RJ, Lee NY, Zakeri K. Higher Rates of Inadequate Adjuvant Radiation Dose Among Older Adults with Head and Neck Cancer. Laryngoscope 2024; 134:2206-2211. [PMID: 37983853 DOI: 10.1002/lary.31188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the rate of inadequate radiotherapy and identify risk factors associated with inadequate adjuvant radiotherapy for head and neck cancer among older adults. METHODS A retrospective review of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) was performed to identify patients diagnosed with squamous cell cancer of the head and neck between 2004 and 2017. Patients with a single malignancy, negative surgical margins, no extranodal extension, and receipt of adjuvant radiation without systemic therapy were included in the study cohort. The main outcome of interest was the adjuvant radiation dose received. Participant data were compared using univariable, multivariable, and correlation analyses to evaluate risk factors for inadequate radiation therapy (RT) dosing. RESULTS Among 7608 patients, 1010 patients (13.3%) received an inadequate radiation dose and 6598 (86.7%) received an adequate dose. Patients living in a higher income zip-code, younger age, and those who received intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) were more likely to receive an adequate radiation dose (p < 0.05). Patients older than 70 and 80 years old had a greater likelihood of receiving an inadequate radiation dose (≥70 vs. <70: 16.9% vs. 12.5%; p < 0.05 and ≥80 vs. <80: 20.6% vs. 13.0%%; p < 0.05). Similarly, increasing age was negatively correlated with radiation dose (correlation coefficient: -0.05; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION A substantial proportion of older patients receiving adjuvant radiation do not complete the full treatment. Older age, year of diagnosis, non-IMRT, and living in a lower-income zip code were associated with early termination of RT. Future studies should examine strategies to improve tolerance of adjuvant RT so that more patients complete the full treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3; Cohort Study Laryngoscope, 134:2206-2211, 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Raab
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Yao Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Babak Givi
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Richard J Wong
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yang F, Wong RJ, Zakeri K, Singh A, Estilo CL, Lee NY. Osteoradionecrosis Rates Following Head and Neck Radiotherapy: Beyond the Numbers. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024:S1879-8500(24)00084-5. [PMID: 38649030 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2024.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is a severe late complication of head and neck radiotherapy shown to have profound negative impact on the quality of life of cancer survivors. Over the past few decades, improvements in radiation delivery techniques have resulted in a decrease in the incidence of ORN. However, even with modern radiotherapy techniques, ORN remains an important clinical concern. In recent literature, there is a wide range of reported ORN rates from 0% to as high as 20%. With such a high level of variability in the reported incidence of ORN, oncologists often encounter difficulties estimating the risk of this serious radiotherapy toxicity. In this review, the authors present a summary of the factors that contribute to the high level of variability in the reported incidence of ORN, and highlight that the variable definition, variable grading, and heterogeneity of both study inclusion criteria and treatment parameters can each significantly influence the reporting of ORN rates. Given numerous factors can affect the reported incidence of ORN, a thorough understanding of the clinical context behind the reported ORN rates is needed to comprehend the true risk of this important radiotherapy toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fan Yang
- Dept of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| | - Richard J Wong
- Dept of Head and Neck Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Dept of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| | - Annu Singh
- Dept of Dentistry, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| | - Cherry L Estilo
- Dept of Dentistry, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Dept of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Moreno AC, Watson EE, Humbert-Vidan L, Peterson DE, van Dijk LV, Urbano TG, Van den Bosch L, Hope AJ, Katz MS, Hoebers FJ, Aponte Wesson RA, Bates JE, Bossi P, Dayo AF, Doré M, Fregnani ER, Galloway TJ, Gelblum DY, Hanna IA, Henson CE, Kiat-amnuay S, Korfage A, Lee NY, Lewis CM, Lynggaard CD, Mäkitie AA, Magalhaes M, Mowery YM, Muñoz-Montplet C, Myers JN, Orlandi E, Patel J, Rigert JM, Saunders D, Schoenfeld JD, Selek U, Somay E, Takiar V, Thariat J, Verduijn GM, Villa A, West N, Witjes MJ, Won A, Wong ME, Yao CM, Young SW, Al-eryani K, Barbon CE, Buurman DJ, Dieleman FJ, Hofstede TM, Khan AA, Otun AO, Robinson JC, Hum L, Johansen J, Lalla R, Lin A, Patel V, Shaw RJ, Chambers MS, Ma D, Singh M, Yarom N, Mohamed ASR, Hutcheson KA, Lai SY, Fuller CD. International Expert-Based Consensus Definition, Staging Criteria, and Minimum Data Elements for Osteoradionecrosis of the Jaw: An Inter-Disciplinary Modified Delphi Study. medRxiv 2024:2024.04.07.24305400. [PMID: 38645105 PMCID: PMC11030490 DOI: 10.1101/2024.04.07.24305400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/23/2024]
Abstract
Purpose Osteoradionecrosis of the jaw (ORNJ) is a severe iatrogenic disease characterized by bone death after radiation therapy (RT) to the head and neck. With over 9 published definitions and at least 16 diagnostic/staging systems, the true incidence and severity of ORNJ are obscured by lack of a standard for disease definition and severity assessment, leading to inaccurate estimation of incidence, reporting ambiguity, and likely under-diagnosis worldwide. This study aimed to achieve consensus on an explicit definition and phenotype of ORNJ and related precursor states through data standardization to facilitate effective diagnosis, monitoring, and multidisciplinary management of ORNJ. Methods The ORAL Consortium comprised 69 international experts, including representatives from medical, surgical, radiation oncology, and oral/dental disciplines. Using a web-based modified Delphi technique, panelists classified descriptive cases using existing staging systems, reviewed systems for feature extraction and specification, and iteratively classified cases based on clinical/imaging feature combinations. Results The Consortium ORNJ definition was developed in alignment with SNOMED-CT terminology and recent ISOO-MASCC-ASCO guideline recommendations. Case review using existing ORNJ staging systems showed high rates of inability to classify (up to 76%). Ten consensus statements and nine minimum data elements (MDEs) were outlined for prospective collection and classification of precursor/ORNJ stages. Conclusion This study provides an international, consensus-based definition and MDE foundation for standardized ORNJ reporting in cancer survivors treated with RT. Head and neck surgeons, radiation, surgical, medical oncologists, and dental specialists should adopt MDEs to enable scalable health information exchange and analytics. Work is underway to develop both a human- and machine-readable knowledge representation for ORNJ (i.e., ontology) and multidisciplinary resources for dissemination to improve ORNJ reporting in academic and community practice settings.
Collapse
|
4
|
Youssef I, Mohamed N, Kallini D, Zakeri K, Lin H, Han D, Qi H, Nosov A, Riaz N, Chen L, Yu Y, Dunn LA, Sherman EJ, Wray R, Schöder H, Lee NY. An Analysis of Positron Emission Tomography Maximum Standard Uptake Value Among Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Receiving Photon and Proton Radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)00428-0. [PMID: 38499254 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Revised: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE One main advantage of proton therapy versus photon therapy is its precise radiation delivery to targets without exit dose, resulting in lower dose to surrounding healthy tissues. This is critical, given the proximity of head and neck tumors to normal structures. However, proton planning requires careful consideration of factors, including air-tissue interface, anatomic uncertainties, surgical artifacts, weight fluctuations, rapid tumor response, and daily variations in setup and anatomy, as these heterogeneities can lead to inaccuracies in targeting and creating unwarranted hotspots to a greater extent than photon radiation. In addition, the elevated relative biological effectiveness at the Bragg peak's distal end can also increase hot spots within and outside the target area. METHODS AND MATERIALS The purpose of this study was to evaluate for a difference in positron emission tomography (PET) standard uptake value (SUV) after definitive treatment, between intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and intensity modulated photon therapy (IMRT). In addition, we compared the biologic dose between PET areas of high and low uptake within the clinical target volume-primary of patients treated with IMPT. This work is assuming that the greater SUV may potentially result in greater toxicities. For the purposes of this short communication, we are strictly focusing on the SUV and do not have correlation with toxicity outcomes. To accomplish this, we compared the 3- and 6-month posttreatment fluorodeoxyglucose PET scans for 100 matched patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated definitively without surgery using either IMPT (n = 50) or IMRT (n = 50). RESULTS Our study found a significant difference in biologic dose between the high- and low-uptake regions on 3-month posttreatment scans of IMPT. However, this difference did not translate to a significant difference in PET uptake in the clinical target volume-primary at 3 and 6 months' follow-up between patients who received IMPT versus IMRT. CONCLUSIONS Studies have proposed that proton's greater relative biological effectiveness at the Bragg peak could lead to tissue inflammation. Our study did not corroborate these findings. This study's conclusion underscores the need for further investigations with ultimate correlation with clinical toxicity outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irini Youssef
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; New York Proton Center, New York, New York
| | - Nader Mohamed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daniel Kallini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Haibo Lin
- New York Proton Center, New York, New York
| | - Dong Han
- New York Proton Center, New York, New York
| | - Hang Qi
- New York Proton Center, New York, New York
| | - Anton Nosov
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nadeem Riaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Linda Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yao Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Lara Ann Dunn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Eric J Sherman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Rick Wray
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Heiko Schöder
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; New York Proton Center, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lee NY, Sherman EJ, Schöder H, Wray R, Boyle JO, Singh B, Grkovski M, Paudyal R, Cunningham L, Zhang Z, Hatzoglou V, Katabi N, Diplas BH, Han J, Imber BS, Pham K, Yu Y, Zakeri K, McBride SM, Kang JJ, Tsai CJ, Chen LC, Gelblum DY, Shah JP, Ganly I, Cohen MA, Cracchiolo JR, Morris LG, Dunn LA, Michel LS, Fetten JV, Kripani A, Pfister DG, Ho AL, Shukla-Dave A, Humm JL, Powell SN, Li BT, Reis-Filho JS, Diaz LA, Wong RJ, Riaz N. Hypoxia-Directed Treatment of Human Papillomavirus-Related Oropharyngeal Carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:940-950. [PMID: 38241600 PMCID: PMC10927322 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Standard curative-intent chemoradiotherapy for human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal carcinoma results in significant toxicity. Since hypoxic tumors are radioresistant, we posited that the aerobic state of a tumor could identify patients eligible for de-escalation of chemoradiotherapy while maintaining treatment efficacy. METHODS We enrolled patients with HPV-related oropharyngeal carcinoma to receive de-escalated definitive chemoradiotherapy in a phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03323463). Patients first underwent surgical removal of disease at their primary site, but not of gross disease in the neck. A baseline 18F-fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography scan was used to measure tumor hypoxia and was repeated 1-2 weeks intratreatment. Patients with nonhypoxic tumors received 30 Gy (3 weeks) with chemotherapy, whereas those with hypoxic tumors received standard chemoradiotherapy to 70 Gy (7 weeks). The primary objective was achieving a 2-year locoregional control (LRC) of 95% with a 7% noninferiority margin. RESULTS One hundred fifty-eight patients with T0-2/N1-N2c were enrolled, of which 152 patients were eligible for analyses. Of these, 128 patients met criteria for 30 Gy and 24 patients received 70 Gy. The 2-year LRC was 94.7% (95% CI, 89.8 to 97.7), meeting our primary objective. With a median follow-up time of 38.3 (range, 22.1-58.4) months, the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 94% and 100%, respectively, for the 30-Gy cohort. The 70-Gy cohort had similar 2-year PFS and OS rates at 96% and 96%, respectively. Acute grade 3-4 adverse events were more common in 70 Gy versus 30 Gy (58.3% v 32%; P = .02). Late grade 3-4 adverse events only occurred in the 70-Gy cohort, in which 4.5% complained of late dysphagia. CONCLUSION Tumor hypoxia is a promising approach to direct dosing of curative-intent chemoradiotherapy for HPV-related carcinomas with preserved efficacy and substantially reduced toxicity that requires further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy Y. Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Eric J. Sherman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - HeiKo Schöder
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Rick Wray
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jay O. Boyle
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Bhuvanesh Singh
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Milan Grkovski
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ramesh Paudyal
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Louise Cunningham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Zhigang Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Vaios Hatzoglou
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Nora Katabi
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Bill H. Diplas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - James Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Brandon S. Imber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Khoi Pham
- Department of Finance, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Yao Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Sean M. McBride
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jung J. Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - C. Jillian Tsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Linda C. Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Daphna Y. Gelblum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jatin P. Shah
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ian Ganly
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Marc A. Cohen
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Luc G.T. Morris
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Lara A. Dunn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Loren S. Michel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - James V. Fetten
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Anuja Kripani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - David G. Pfister
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Alan L. Ho
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Amita Shukla-Dave
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - John L. Humm
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Simon N. Powell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Bob T. Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jorge S. Reis-Filho
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Luis A. Diaz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Richard J. Wong
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Nadeem Riaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Raab G, Yu Y, Sherman E, Wong R, Mell LK, Lee NY, Zakeri K. Nomogram to predict risk of early mortality following definitive or adjuvant radiation and systemic therapy for head and neck cancer. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 45:100725. [PMID: 38304239 PMCID: PMC10832379 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 01/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose/Objectives We sought to create nomograms to predict individual risk of early mortality, which can identify patients who require interventions to prevent early death. Methods We included patients in the National Cancer Database with non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck who received radiation and systemic therapy between 2004 and 2017 in the definitive or adjuvant setting. Early mortality was defined as any death less than 90 days after starting radiation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between covariates and early mortality. Nomograms to predict the risk of early death were created for both the definitive and adjuvant settings. Results Among 84,563 patients in the definitive group and 18,514 patients in the adjuvant group, rates of early mortality were 3.5 % (95 % CI 3.4-3.7 %) and 2.2 %, (95 % CI 1.9-2.4 %), respectively. Patients above the age of 70 had an early mortality rate of 7.8 % (95 % CI 7.3-8.2 %) in the definitive group and 4.4 % (95 % CI 3.6-5.4 %) in the adjuvant group. In the multivariable analysis, age, comorbidity, T and N category, and tumor site were associated with early mortality in both cohorts (p < 0.05 for all). Nomograms including age, comorbidity, T and N category and tumor site performed better than age alone at predicting early mortality (AUC for definitive group: 0.70 vs 0.66; AUC for adjuvant group: 0.71 vs 0.61). Conclusion Nomograms including age, comorbidity, T and N category and tumor site were developed to predict the risk of early death following definitive or adjuvant chemoradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Raab
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yao Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric Sherman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Richard Wong
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Loren K. Mell
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Nancy Y. Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kuan EC, Wang EW, Adappa ND, Beswick DM, London NR, Su SY, Wang MB, Abuzeid WM, Alexiev B, Alt JA, Antognoni P, Alonso-Basanta M, Batra PS, Bhayani M, Bell D, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Betz CS, Blay JY, Bleier BS, Bonilla-Velez J, Callejas C, Carrau RL, Casiano RR, Castelnuovo P, Chandra RK, Chatzinakis V, Chen SB, Chiu AG, Choby G, Chowdhury NI, Citardi MJ, Cohen MA, Dagan R, Dalfino G, Dallan I, Dassi CS, de Almeida J, Dei Tos AP, DelGaudio JM, Ebert CS, El-Sayed IH, Eloy JA, Evans JJ, Fang CH, Farrell NF, Ferrari M, Fischbein N, Folbe A, Fokkens WJ, Fox MG, Lund VJ, Gallia GL, Gardner PA, Geltzeiler M, Georgalas C, Getz AE, Govindaraj S, Gray ST, Grayson JW, Gross BA, Grube JG, Guo R, Ha PK, Halderman AA, Hanna EY, Harvey RJ, Hernandez SC, Holtzman AL, Hopkins C, Huang Z, Huang Z, Humphreys IM, Hwang PH, Iloreta AM, Ishii M, Ivan ME, Jafari A, Kennedy DW, Khan M, Kimple AJ, Kingdom TT, Knisely A, Kuo YJ, Lal D, Lamarre ED, Lan MY, Le H, Lechner M, Lee NY, Lee JK, Lee VH, Levine CG, Lin JC, Lin DT, Lobo BC, Locke T, Luong AU, Magliocca KR, Markovic SN, Matnjani G, McKean EL, Meço C, Mendenhall WM, Michel L, Na'ara S, Nicolai P, Nuss DW, Nyquist GG, Oakley GM, Omura K, Orlandi RR, Otori N, Papagiannopoulos P, Patel ZM, Pfister DG, Phan J, Psaltis AJ, Rabinowitz MR, Ramanathan M, Rimmer R, Rosen MR, Sanusi O, Sargi ZB, Schafhausen P, Schlosser RJ, Sedaghat AR, Senior BA, Shrivastava R, Sindwani R, Smith TL, Smith KA, Snyderman CH, Solares CA, Sreenath SB, Stamm A, Stölzel K, Sumer B, Surda P, Tajudeen BA, Thompson LDR, Thorp BD, Tong CCL, Tsang RK, Turner JH, Turri-Zanoni M, Udager AM, van Zele T, VanKoevering K, Welch KC, Wise SK, Witterick IJ, Won TB, Wong SN, Woodworth BA, Wormald PJ, Yao WC, Yeh CF, Zhou B, Palmer JN. International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2024; 14:149-608. [PMID: 37658764 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sinonasal neoplasms, whether benign and malignant, pose a significant challenge to clinicians and represent a model area for multidisciplinary collaboration in order to optimize patient care. The International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors (ICSNT) aims to summarize the best available evidence and presents 48 thematic and histopathology-based topics spanning the field. METHODS In accordance with prior International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology documents, ICSNT assigned each topic as an Evidence-Based Review with Recommendations, Evidence-Based Review, and Literature Review based on the level of evidence. An international group of multidisciplinary author teams were assembled for the topic reviews using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses format, and completed sections underwent a thorough and iterative consensus-building process. The final document underwent rigorous synthesis and review prior to publication. RESULTS The ICSNT document consists of four major sections: general principles, benign neoplasms and lesions, malignant neoplasms, and quality of life and surveillance. It covers 48 conceptual and/or histopathology-based topics relevant to sinonasal neoplasms and masses. Topics with a high level of evidence provided specific recommendations, while other areas summarized the current state of evidence. A final section highlights research opportunities and future directions, contributing to advancing knowledge and community intervention. CONCLUSION As an embodiment of the multidisciplinary and collaborative model of care in sinonasal neoplasms and masses, ICSNT was designed as a comprehensive, international, and multidisciplinary collaborative endeavor. Its primary objective is to summarize the existing evidence in the field of sinonasal neoplasms and masses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward C Kuan
- Departments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Eric W Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nithin D Adappa
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Daniel M Beswick
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Nyall R London
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Sinonasal and Skull Base Tumor Program, Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Shirley Y Su
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Marilene B Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Waleed M Abuzeid
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Borislav Alexiev
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jeremiah A Alt
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Paolo Antognoni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Michelle Alonso-Basanta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Pete S Batra
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mihir Bhayani
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Diana Bell
- Department of Pathology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Manuel Bernal-Sprekelsen
- Otorhinolaryngology Department, Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Christian S Betz
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, UNICANCER, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - Benjamin S Bleier
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Juliana Bonilla-Velez
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Claudio Callejas
- Department of Otolaryngology, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Ricardo L Carrau
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Roy R Casiano
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Paolo Castelnuovo
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Rakesh K Chandra
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Simon B Chen
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Alexander G Chiu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Garret Choby
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Naweed I Chowdhury
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Martin J Citardi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Marc A Cohen
- Department of Surgery, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Roi Dagan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Gianluca Dalfino
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Iacopo Dallan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - John de Almeida
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angelo P Dei Tos
- Section of Pathology, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - John M DelGaudio
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Charles S Ebert
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ivan H El-Sayed
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jean Anderson Eloy
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - James J Evans
- Department of Neurological Surgery and Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christina H Fang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, The University Hospital for Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Nyssa F Farrell
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Marco Ferrari
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Nancy Fischbein
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Adam Folbe
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA
| | - Wytske J Fokkens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Meha G Fox
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Gary L Gallia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Paul A Gardner
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mathew Geltzeiler
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Christos Georgalas
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Anne E Getz
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Satish Govindaraj
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Stacey T Gray
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jessica W Grayson
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Bradley A Gross
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jordon G Grube
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Ruifeng Guo
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Patrick K Ha
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Ashleigh A Halderman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Ehab Y Hanna
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Richard J Harvey
- Rhinology and Skull Base Research Group, Applied Medical Research Centre, University of South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephen C Hernandez
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Adam L Holtzman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Claire Hopkins
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Guys and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Zhigang Huang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenxiao Huang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Ian M Humphreys
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Peter H Hwang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Alfred M Iloreta
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Masaru Ishii
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Michael E Ivan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Aria Jafari
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - David W Kennedy
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mohemmed Khan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Adam J Kimple
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Todd T Kingdom
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Anna Knisely
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Ying-Ju Kuo
- Department of Pathology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Devyani Lal
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Eric D Lamarre
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Ming-Ying Lan
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hien Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Matt Lechner
- UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jivianne K Lee
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Victor H Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Corinna G Levine
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Jin-Ching Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Derrick T Lin
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Brian C Lobo
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Tran Locke
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Amber U Luong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kelly R Magliocca
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Svetomir N Markovic
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Gesa Matnjani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Erin L McKean
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Cem Meço
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Salzburg Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - William M Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Loren Michel
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Shorook Na'ara
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Piero Nicolai
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Daniel W Nuss
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Gurston G Nyquist
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Gretchen M Oakley
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Kazuhiro Omura
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Richard R Orlandi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Nobuyoshi Otori
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Peter Papagiannopoulos
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Zara M Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - David G Pfister
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alkis J Psaltis
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Mindy R Rabinowitz
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Murugappan Ramanathan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ryan Rimmer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Marc R Rosen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Olabisi Sanusi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Zoukaa B Sargi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Philippe Schafhausen
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Ahmad R Sedaghat
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Brent A Senior
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Raj Shrivastava
- Department of Neurosurgery and Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Raj Sindwani
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Timothy L Smith
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Kristine A Smith
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Carl H Snyderman
- Departments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - C Arturo Solares
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Satyan B Sreenath
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Aldo Stamm
- São Paulo ENT Center (COF), Edmundo Vasconcelos Complex, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Katharina Stölzel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Baran Sumer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Pavol Surda
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Guys and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Bobby A Tajudeen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Brian D Thorp
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Charles C L Tong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Raymond K Tsang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Justin H Turner
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Mario Turri-Zanoni
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Aaron M Udager
- Department of Pathology, Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Thibaut van Zele
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Kyle VanKoevering
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Kevin C Welch
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Sarah K Wise
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ian J Witterick
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tae-Bin Won
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Stephanie N Wong
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Bradford A Woodworth
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Peter-John Wormald
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - William C Yao
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Chien-Fu Yeh
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Bing Zhou
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - James N Palmer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Levyn H, Yang F, Lee NY. Radiation oncology for the rhinologist. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2024; 32:5-13. [PMID: 38116957 DOI: 10.1097/moo.0000000000000942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This comprehensive review explores evolving treatment strategies for sinonasal and nasopharyngeal malignancies. It analyzes the role of adjuvant radiotherapy, the potential of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), and the relevance of de-escalation strategies nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Additionally, it discusses hyperfractionation in re-irradiation in NPC. RECENT FINDINGS Adjuvant radiotherapy remains pivotal for sinonasal tumors, improving locoregional control and survival, notably in squamous cell carcinomas, adenocarcinomas, and adenoid cystic carcinomas. IMPT promises enhanced outcomes by sparing healthy tissues, potentially improving patients' quality of life. For select stage II/T3N0 NPC, radiotherapy alone offers comparable outcomes to concurrent chemoradiotherapy, with fewer adverse events and improved quality of life. Selective neck irradiation in NPC patients with uninvolved necks maintains oncologic outcomes while reducing late toxicity. Hyperfractionation in re-irradiation shows promise in lowering late toxicities and improving overall survival, particularly in undifferentiated sinonasal carcinomas. SUMMARY This review underscores the significance of adjuvant radiotherapy and the potential of advanced radiation techniques in optimizing sinonasal and nasopharyngeal malignancy outcomes. It emphasizes evolving de-escalation methods and individualized, evidence-based approaches. Future research will further refine strategies for these challenging malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fan Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tsai CJ, Yang JT, Shaverdian N, Patel J, Shepherd AF, Eng J, Guttmann D, Yeh R, Gelblum DY, Namakydoust A, Preeshagul I, Modi S, Seidman A, Traina T, Drullinsky P, Flynn J, Zhang Z, Rimner A, Gillespie EF, Gomez DR, Lee NY, Berger M, Robson ME, Reis-Filho JS, Riaz N, Rudin CM, Powell SN. Standard-of-care systemic therapy with or without stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with oligoprogressive breast cancer or non-small-cell lung cancer (Consolidative Use of Radiotherapy to Block [CURB] oligoprogression): an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2 study. Lancet 2024; 403:171-182. [PMID: 38104577 PMCID: PMC10880046 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01857-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most patients with metastatic cancer eventually develop resistance to systemic therapy, with some having limited disease progression (ie, oligoprogression). We aimed to assess whether stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) targeting oligoprogressive sites could improve patient outcomes. METHODS We did a phase 2, open-label, randomised controlled trial of SBRT in patients with oligoprogressive metastatic breast cancer or non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after having received at least first-line systemic therapy, with oligoprogression defined as five or less progressive lesions on PET-CT or CT. Patients aged 18 years or older were enrolled from a tertiary cancer centre in New York, NY, USA, and six affiliated regional centres in the states of New York and New Jersey, with a 1:1 randomisation between standard of care (standard-of-care group) and SBRT plus standard of care (SBRT group). Randomisation was done with a computer-based algorithm with stratification by number of progressive sites of metastasis, receptor or driver genetic alteration status, primary site, and type of systemic therapy previously received. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, measured up to 12 months. We did a prespecified subgroup analysis of the primary endpoint by disease site. All analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03808662, and is complete. FINDINGS From Jan 1, 2019, to July 31, 2021, 106 patients were randomly assigned to standard of care (n=51; 23 patients with breast cancer and 28 patients with NSCLC) or SBRT plus standard of care (n=55; 24 patients with breast cancer and 31 patients with NSCLC). 16 (34%) of 47 patients with breast cancer had triple-negative disease, and 51 (86%) of 59 patients with NSCLC had no actionable driver mutation. The study was closed to accrual before reaching the targeted sample size, after the primary efficacy endpoint was met during a preplanned interim analysis. The median follow-up was 11·6 months for patients in the standard-of-care group and 12·1 months for patients in the SBRT group. The median progression-free survival was 3·2 months (95% CI 2·0-4·5) for patients in the standard-of-care group versus 7·2 months (4·5-10·0) for patients in the SBRT group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·53, 95% CI 0·35-0·81; p=0·0035). The median progression-free survival was higher for patients with NSCLC in the SBRT group than for those with NSCLC in the standard-of-care group (10·0 months [7·2-not reached] vs 2·2 months [95% CI 2·0-4·5]; HR 0·41, 95% CI 0·22-0·75; p=0·0039), but no difference was found for patients with breast cancer (4·4 months [2·5-8·7] vs 4·2 months [1·8-5·5]; 0·78, 0·43-1·43; p=0·43). Grade 2 or worse adverse events occurred in 21 (41%) patients in the standard-of-care group and 34 (62%) patients in the SBRT group. Nine (16%) patients in the SBRT group had grade 2 or worse toxicities related to SBRT, including gastrointestinal reflux disease, pain exacerbation, radiation pneumonitis, brachial plexopathy, and low blood counts. INTERPRETATION The trial showed that progression-free survival was increased in the SBRT plus standard-of-care group compared with standard of care only. Oligoprogression in patients with metastatic NSCLC could be effectively treated with SBRT plus standard of care, leading to more than a four-times increase in progression-free survival compared with standard of care only. By contrast, no benefit was observed in patients with oligoprogressive breast cancer. Further studies to validate these findings and understand the differential benefits are warranted. FUNDING National Cancer Institute.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiaojung Jillian Tsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Jonathan T Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Narek Shaverdian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Juber Patel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Annemarie F Shepherd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Juliana Eng
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David Guttmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Randy Yeh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daphna Y Gelblum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Azadeh Namakydoust
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Isabel Preeshagul
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shanu Modi
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew Seidman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tiffany Traina
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pamela Drullinsky
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jessica Flynn
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zhigang Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Erin F Gillespie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Daniel R Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael Berger
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark E Robson
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jorge S Reis-Filho
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nadeem Riaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Charles M Rudin
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Simon N Powell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gouw ZAR, Jeong J, Rimner A, Lee NY, Jackson A, Fu A, Sonke JJ, Deasy JO. "Primer shot" fractionation with an early treatment break is theoretically superior to consecutive weekday fractionation schemes for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Radiother Oncol 2024; 190:110006. [PMID: 37972733 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.110006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 10/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiotherapy is traditionally given in equally spaced weekday fractions. We hypothesize that heterogeneous interfraction intervals can increase radiosensitivity via reoxygenation. Through modeling, we investigate whether this minimizes local failures and toxicity for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS Previously, a tumor dose-response model based on resource competition and cell-cycle-dependent radiosensitivity accurately predicted local failure rates for early-stage NSCLC cohorts. Here, the model mathematically determined non-uniform inter-fraction intervals minimizing local failures at similar normal tissue toxicity risk, i.e., iso-BED3 (iso-NTCP) for fractionation schemes 18Gyx3, 12Gyx4, 10Gyx5, 7.5Gyx8, 5Gyx12, 4Gyx15. Next, we used these optimized schedules to reduce toxicity risk (BED3) while maintaining stable local failures (TCP). RESULTS Optimal schedules consistently favored a "primer shot" fraction followed by a 2-week break, allowing tumor reoxygenation. Increasing or decreasing the assumed baseline hypoxia extended or shortened this optimal break by up to one week. Fraction sizes of 7.5 Gy and up required a single primer shot, while smaller fractions needed one or two extra fractions for full reoxygenation. The optimized schedules, versus consecutive weekday fractionation, predicted absolute LF reductions of 4.6%-7.4%, except for the already optimal LF rate seen for 18Gyx3. Primer shot schedules could also reduce BED3 at iso-TCP with the biggest improvements for the shortest schedules (94.6Gy reduction for 18Gyx3). CONCLUSION A validated simulation model clearly supports non-standard "primer shot" fractionation, reducing the impact of hypoxia-induced radioresistance. A limitation of this study is that primer-shot fractionation is outside prior clinical experience and therefore will require clinical studies for definitive testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z A R Gouw
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Medical Physics, New York, NY, USA; The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands.
| | - J Jeong
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Medical Physics, New York, NY, USA
| | - A Rimner
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, NY, USA
| | - N Y Lee
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, NY, USA
| | - A Jackson
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Medical Physics, New York, NY, USA
| | - A Fu
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Medical Physics, New York, NY, USA
| | - J-J Sonke
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands
| | - J O Deasy
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Medical Physics, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Han JE, Zakeri K, Michel L, Sherman EJ, Lee NY. Rebuttal to comment on "Concurrent carboplatin and paclitaxel definitive radiation therapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer". Head Neck 2024; 46:230-231. [PMID: 37881148 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
see pages 228‐229
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James E Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Loren Michel
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Eric J Sherman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
LoCastro E, Paudyal R, Konar AS, LaViolette PS, Akin O, Hatzoglou V, Goh AC, Bochner BH, Rosenberg J, Wong RJ, Lee NY, Schwartz LH, Shukla-Dave A. A Quantitative Multiparametric MRI Analysis Platform for Estimation of Robust Imaging Biomarkers in Clinical Oncology. Tomography 2023; 9:2052-2066. [PMID: 37987347 PMCID: PMC10661267 DOI: 10.3390/tomography9060161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023] Open
Abstract
There is a need to develop user-friendly imaging tools estimating robust quantitative biomarkers (QIBs) from multiparametric (mp)MRI for clinical applications in oncology. Quantitative metrics derived from (mp)MRI can monitor and predict early responses to treatment, often prior to anatomical changes. We have developed a vendor-agnostic, flexible, and user-friendly MATLAB-based toolkit, MRI-Quantitative Analysis and Multiparametric Evaluation Routines ("MRI-QAMPER", current release v3.0), for the estimation of quantitative metrics from dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) and multi-b value diffusion-weighted (DW) MR and MR relaxometry. MRI-QAMPER's functionality includes generating numerical parametric maps from these methods reflecting tumor permeability, cellularity, and tissue morphology. MRI-QAMPER routines were validated using digital reference objects (DROs) for DCE and DW MRI, serving as initial approval stages in the National Cancer Institute Quantitative Imaging Network (NCI/QIN) software benchmark. MRI-QAMPER has participated in DCE and DW MRI Collaborative Challenge Projects (CCPs), which are key technical stages in the NCI/QIN benchmark. In a DCE CCP, QAMPER presented the best repeatability coefficient (RC = 0.56) across test-retest brain metastasis data, out of ten participating DCE software packages. In a DW CCP, QAMPER ranked among the top five (out of fourteen) tools with the highest area under the curve (AUC) for prostate cancer detection. This platform can seamlessly process mpMRI data from brain, head and neck, thyroid, prostate, pancreas, and bladder cancer. MRI-QAMPER prospectively analyzes dose de-escalation trial data for oropharyngeal cancer, which has earned it advanced NCI/QIN approval for expanded usage and applications in wider clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eve LoCastro
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (E.L.); (R.P.); (A.S.K.)
| | - Ramesh Paudyal
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (E.L.); (R.P.); (A.S.K.)
| | - Amaresha Shridhar Konar
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (E.L.); (R.P.); (A.S.K.)
| | - Peter S. LaViolette
- Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA;
| | - Oguz Akin
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (O.A.); (V.H.); (L.H.S.)
| | - Vaios Hatzoglou
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (O.A.); (V.H.); (L.H.S.)
| | - Alvin C. Goh
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (A.C.G.); (B.H.B.); (R.J.W.)
| | - Bernard H. Bochner
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (A.C.G.); (B.H.B.); (R.J.W.)
| | - Jonathan Rosenberg
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Richard J. Wong
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (A.C.G.); (B.H.B.); (R.J.W.)
| | - Nancy Y. Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Lawrence H. Schwartz
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (O.A.); (V.H.); (L.H.S.)
| | - Amita Shukla-Dave
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (E.L.); (R.P.); (A.S.K.)
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (O.A.); (V.H.); (L.H.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Raab GT, Restifo D, Tin AL, Vickers AJ, McBride SM, Wong RJ, Lee NY, Zakeri K, Shahrokni A. Differential use of postoperative psychosocial and physical services among older adults with head and neck cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2023; 14:101609. [PMID: 37678051 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Older adults undergoing head and neck cancer (HNC) surgery often have significant functional and mental health impairments. We examined use of postoperative physical, nutritional, and psychosocial services among a cohort of older adults with HNC comanaged by geriatricians and surgeons. MATERIALS AND METHODS Our sample consisted of older adults who were referred to the Geriatrics Service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 2015 and 2019 and took a geriatric assessment (GA) prior to undergoing HNC surgery. Physical, nutritional, and psychosocial service utilization was assessed. Physical services included a physical, occupational, or rehabilitation consult during the patient's stay. Nutritional services consisted of speech and swallow or nutritional consult. Psychosocial services consisted of psychiatry, psychology, or a social work consult. Relationships between each service use, geriatric deficits, demographic, and surgical characteristics were assessed using Wilcoxon rank-sum test or Chi-square test. RESULTS In total, 157 patients were included, with median age of 80 and length of stay of six days. The most common GA impairments were major distress (61%), depression (59%), social activity limitation (SAL) (54%), and deficits in activities of daily living (ADL) (44%). Nutritional and physical services were used much more frequently than psychosocial services (80% and 85% vs 31%, respectively). Receipt of services was associated with longer median length of hospital stay, operation time, and greater deficits in ADLs. SAL was associated with physical and psychosocial consult and lower Timed Up and Go (TUG) score; instrumental ADL (iADL) deficits were associated with physical services; and depression and distress were associated with psychosocial services. DISCUSSION The burden of psychosocial deficits is high among older adults with HNC. Future work is needed to understand the limited utilization of psychosocial services in this population as well as whether referral to psychosocial services can reduce the burden of these deficits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Amy L Tin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew J Vickers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sean M McBride
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Richard J Wong
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Armin Shahrokni
- Geriatrics Service, Department of Medicine, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, NJ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tsai P, Tseng YL, Shen B, Ackerman C, Zhai HA, Yu F, Simone CB, Choi JI, Lee NY, Kabarriti R, Lazarev S, Johnson CL, Liu J, Chen CC, Lin H. The Applications and Pitfalls of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Based Synthetic Computed Tomography for Adaptive Evaluation in Pencil-Beam Scanning Proton Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5101. [PMID: 37894469 PMCID: PMC10605451 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15205101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The study evaluates the efficacy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based synthetic CTs (sCT) as a potential alternative to verification CT (vCT) for enhanced treatment monitoring and early adaptation in proton therapy. METHODS Seven common treatment sites were studied. Two sets of sCT per case were generated: direct-deformed (DD) sCT and image-correction (IC) sCT. The image qualities and dosimetric impact of the sCT were compared to the same-day vCT. RESULTS The sCT agreed with vCT in regions of homogeneous tissues such as the brain and breast; however, notable discrepancies were observed in the thorax and abdomen. The sCT outliers existed for DD sCT when there was an anatomy change and for IC sCT in low-density regions. The target coverage exhibited less than a 5% variance in most DD and IC sCT cases when compared to vCT. The Dmax of serial organ-at-risk (OAR) in sCT plans shows greater deviation from vCT than small-volume dose metrics (D0.1cc). The parallel OAR volumetric and mean doses remained consistent, with average deviations below 1.5%. CONCLUSION The use of sCT enables precise treatment and prompt early adaptation for proton therapy. The quality assurance of sCT is mandatory in the early stage of clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pingfang Tsai
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (P.T.); (B.S.); (H.A.Z.); (F.Y.); (C.B.S.II); (J.I.C.); (C.L.J.); (J.L.); (C.-C.C.)
| | - Yu-Lun Tseng
- Proton Center, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan;
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
| | - Brian Shen
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (P.T.); (B.S.); (H.A.Z.); (F.Y.); (C.B.S.II); (J.I.C.); (C.L.J.); (J.L.); (C.-C.C.)
| | | | - Huifang A. Zhai
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (P.T.); (B.S.); (H.A.Z.); (F.Y.); (C.B.S.II); (J.I.C.); (C.L.J.); (J.L.); (C.-C.C.)
| | - Francis Yu
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (P.T.); (B.S.); (H.A.Z.); (F.Y.); (C.B.S.II); (J.I.C.); (C.L.J.); (J.L.); (C.-C.C.)
| | - Charles B. Simone
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (P.T.); (B.S.); (H.A.Z.); (F.Y.); (C.B.S.II); (J.I.C.); (C.L.J.); (J.L.); (C.-C.C.)
| | - J. Isabelle Choi
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (P.T.); (B.S.); (H.A.Z.); (F.Y.); (C.B.S.II); (J.I.C.); (C.L.J.); (J.L.); (C.-C.C.)
| | - Nancy Y. Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Rafi Kabarriti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY 10467, USA;
| | - Stanislav Lazarev
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA;
| | - Casey L. Johnson
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (P.T.); (B.S.); (H.A.Z.); (F.Y.); (C.B.S.II); (J.I.C.); (C.L.J.); (J.L.); (C.-C.C.)
| | - Jiayi Liu
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (P.T.); (B.S.); (H.A.Z.); (F.Y.); (C.B.S.II); (J.I.C.); (C.L.J.); (J.L.); (C.-C.C.)
| | - Chin-Cheng Chen
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (P.T.); (B.S.); (H.A.Z.); (F.Y.); (C.B.S.II); (J.I.C.); (C.L.J.); (J.L.); (C.-C.C.)
| | - Haibo Lin
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (P.T.); (B.S.); (H.A.Z.); (F.Y.); (C.B.S.II); (J.I.C.); (C.L.J.); (J.L.); (C.-C.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Raab GT, Yu Y, Sherman E, Wong RJ, Mell LK, Lee NY, Zakeri K. Nomogram to Predict Risk of Early Mortality Following Definitive or Adjuvant Radiation and Systemic Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e617. [PMID: 37785852 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.1997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Tools to predict individual patient risk for early mortality in head and neck cancer patients receiving chemoradiation are lacking. We sought to create a nomogram to predict individual risk of early mortality, which may help identify patients who require interventions to prevent early death. MATERIALS/METHODS We included patients in the National Cancer Database with non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck who received radiation and systemic therapy between 2004 and 2017 in either the definitive or adjuvant setting. Covariates analyzed in the cohort include race, gender, income, age, T and N category, tumor site, insurance type, facility type, urban or rural environment, radiation modality, and comorbidity. Early mortality was defined as any death less than 90 days after the beginning of radiation. Chi-squared analysis was used for all categorical covariates and t-tests were used for continuous variables to test for associations with early mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between covariates and early mortality. Nomograms to predict the risk of early death were created for both the definitive and adjuvant settings. RESULTS The final cohorts included 84,563 patients in the definitive group and 18,514 patients in the adjuvant group. Rates of early mortality were 3.5% (95% CI 3.4-3.7%) and 2.2% (95% CI 1.9-2.4%) in the definitive and adjuvant cohorts, respectively. Patients above the age of 70 had an early mortality rate of 7.8% (95% CI 7.3-8.2%) in the definitive group and 4.4% (95% CI 3.6-5.4%) in the adjuvant group. In the multivariable analysis, age, comorbidity, T and N category, and tumor site were associated with early mortality in both cohorts (p<0.05 for all); while in the definitive group, radiation type, year of diagnosis, and insurance status were also statistically significant (p<0.05). In both cohorts, nomograms were created to predict the risk of early mortality that included age, comorbidity, T and N category and tumor site. The nomogram including age, comorbidity, T and N category and tumor site performed better than age alone at predicting early mortality (AUC for definitive group: 0.70 vs 0.66; AUC for adjuvant group: 0.71 vs 0.61). CONCLUSION Nomograms including age, comorbidity, T and N category and tumor site were developed to predict the risk of early death following definitive or adjuvant chemoradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G T Raab
- Weill Cornell Medical School, New York, NY
| | - Y Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - E Sherman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - R J Wong
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, New York, NY
| | - L K Mell
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - N Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - K Zakeri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lin H, Yu F, Gorovets D, Kabarriti R, Alektiar KM, Ohri N, Hasan S, Tsai P, Shim A, Kang M, Barker CA, Wolden SL, Hajj C, Mehta KJ, Lee NY, Chhabra AM, Shepherd AF, Choi IJ, Yamada Y, Simone CB. Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT): A Robust Single Institution Experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e686-e687. [PMID: 37786018 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.2155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) To describe the feasibility of treating a complex and diverse group of patients using pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT: 5 or fewer fractions, with a fraction size of at least 5 Gy). MATERIALS/METHODS Our center treats on average 105-120 PBS proton treatments daily, of which 9.5% of treatment courses are proton SBRT. Statistics of disease sites, treatment planning parameters (target volume, prescriptions, number of fields, SFO vs. MFO), and treatment efficiencies (scheduled time slots, actual treatment time) are presented for 305 consecutive SBRT patients receiving 1507 fractions in the past three years. Thermoplastic masks or Vacuum-lock bags are used to immobilize SBRT patients and index the patients' treatment position. Imaging guidance of orthogonal kV images and volumetric cone-beam CT is routinely used for patient setup. RESULTS SBRT patients are grouped based on the target locations: pelvis (31%), liver (17%), thoracic (13%), spine (8%), abdominal (8%), brain (7%), non-spine bone (7%), ocular (6%), and head and neck (2%). Only 112 patients (37%) were receiving their 1st RT course, whereas 113 (37%) had one prior in-field RT course, and 80 (26%) had multiple prior in-field RT courses. The median [IQR] target volume was 65.4 [29.3, 168] cc (range: 0.3-2475 cc). 72% of cases were planned with SFO and 28% with MFO. On average, 3.76 fields (range: 2 to 12) were planned for each treatment. 44% of the treatments were planned with three or fewer fields, and 10% received more than five fields, most of which involved repainting for moving targets. Over 97% of treatments were delivered in 5 fractions, with ∼3% delivered in 3 fractions. The median [IQR] prescription per treatment was 8 [7, 10] Gy (range: 5-18 Gy per treatment). 85% (84%) of the SBRT treatments were scheduled (delivered) in a 45-minute or shorter slot, and 6% (7%) of treatments were scheduled (delivered) in over a one-hour slot, most commonly for multiple isocenter treatments. 93% of treatments were delivered within 15 minutes of the planned treatment time or shorter. Deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) was applied to 45% of liver SBRT cases, with the remaining 55% planned on 4D CT with (14%) or without (86%) abdominal compression. DIBH was applied in 13% of lung SBRT cases. The application of other motion mitigation approaches, such as volumetric repainting, was determined by the target motion amplitude and whether the patient could tolerate DIBH. CONCLUSION In the most diverse and largest proton SBRT experience delivered in the world over the past 3 years, over 300 patients were treated, demonstrating the feasibility and efficiency of delivering proton SBRT in a very busy center. The planning and treatment parameter statistics reported serve as a helpful reference for the proton community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Lin
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - F Yu
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY
| | - D Gorovets
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - R Kabarriti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
| | - K M Alektiar
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - N Ohri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
| | - S Hasan
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY; Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
| | - P Tsai
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY
| | - A Shim
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY
| | - M Kang
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY
| | - C A Barker
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - S L Wolden
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - C Hajj
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - K J Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
| | - N Y Lee
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - A M Chhabra
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY; Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - A F Shepherd
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - I J Choi
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Y Yamada
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - C B Simone
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mohamed N, Mattessich SP, Gelblum D, Lee NY, Barker CA. Radiotherapy (RT) for Cutaneous Adnexal Carcinoma (CAC): 49 Patients Treated at a Single Institution Over 2 Decades. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e607-e608. [PMID: 37785828 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.1978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Cutaneous adnexal carcinomas (CACs) are a heterogenous group of rare skin cancers. Management strategies are extrapolated from the treatment of more common skin cancers, and case series describing patients treated with radiotherapy (RT) for CAC are limited to <15 patients. We reviewed our institutional experience to better understand the characteristics and outcomes of patients with CAC treated with RT. MATERIALS/METHODS Patients diagnosed with CAC and treated RT from 2000-2020 were identified using the following keywords: adnexal, microcystic, apocrine, eccrine, sebaceous, sweat gland, syringoma, mucinous, tubular, porocarcinoma, hidradenocarcinoma, and cylindrocarcinoma. Patient, cancer, and treatment characteristics were assessed by retrospective record review. Time to overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant metastasis (DM), and progression free survival (PFS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS Forty-nine patients with a median age of 65 years (IQR 53-82) were identified. Most were white (90%) men (59%) harboring tumors on the head and neck (80%). The most common subtypes of CAC were adnexal adenocarcinoma (39%), sebaceous carcinoma (35%) and microcystic adnexal carcinoma (10%). Patients were treated for de novo cancer (n = 35) or after recurrence (n = 14). Among de novo cases, 9 (26%) were treated with definitive RT, 22 (63%) were treated with surgery and adjuvant RT, and 4 (11%) with palliative RT. Per UICC system, de novo stage at time of RT was I in 2 (6%), II in 9 (26%), III in 12 (34%), IVA in 10 (29%), and IVB in 2 (6%). Median OS was 44 months and median follow-up of surviving patients was 41 months (IQR 17-75). De novo patients treated with definitive RT received a median dose of 70 Gy (IQR 60-73 Gy) and experienced 2-year rates of PFS, LRR, and DM of 30%, 55%, and 40%, respectively. All LRR events occurred within the irradiated volume. De novo patients treated with surgery and adjuvant RT received a median dose of 60 Gy (IQR 60-64 Gy) and experienced 2-year rates of PFS, LRR, and DM of 77%, 13%, and 10%, respectively. All LRR events occurred outside the irradiated volume. Among patients treated at recurrence, most (93%) underwent surgery and adjuvant RT. Per UICC system, their stage at time of RT was II in 2 (15.4%), III in 4 (30.8%), and IVA in 7 (53.8%). Recurrent patients treated with surgery and adjuvant RT received a median dose of 60 Gy (IQR 60-66 Gy) and experienced 2-year rates of PFS, LRR, and DM of 30%, 58%, and 29%, respectively. Three of 4 evaluable patients treated with palliative RT exhibited stable disease or tumor response. CONCLUSION In the largest single institution analysis to date, RT was primarily used for CAC patients as an adjuvant treatment. LRR was less frequent and less likely to occur within irradiated volume in patients selected for surgery and adjuvant RT than those selected for definitive RT or at time of recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Mohamed
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - D Gelblum
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - N Y Lee
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - C A Barker
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Shang T, Raab G, Chen L, Yu Y, Shamseddine A, Riaz N, McBride SM, Gelblum D, Lee NY, Zakeri K. Impact of Surveillance Imaging in Patients with HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Carcinomas Treated with Definitive Radiation and Chemotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e624. [PMID: 37785868 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.2011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Post-treatment surveillance imaging for HPV-associated oropharyngeal carcinomas (OPCs) differs among physicians and institutions. Surveillance imaging can detect disease progression earlier, but can also contribute to anxiety and cost, without proven disease-free or survival benefit. We sought to determine the number of surveillance scans needed to detect a recurrence in patients with HPV-associated OPCs. MATERIALS/METHODS We included consecutive patients with locally advanced HPV-associated OPC that received definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with 70 Gy between March 1, 2017 to July 31, 2019. First post-treatment scans were defined as the first scans following the end of CRT. Surveillance scans were defined as body FDG PET/CTs, neck or chest CTs, and neck MRIs taken after the first post-treatment scans showed no evidence of disease. Any scans ordered to follow suspicious lesions on first post-treatment scans were not counted as surveillance scans. Recurrences were classified as detected by first post-treatment scans, surveillance scans, clinical exam, or incidental findings. The number of surveillance scans needed to detect 1 recurrence was determined by dividing the number of surveillance scans by the number of recurrences detected by surveillance scans. RESULTS There were a total of 275 patients with median follow-up of 39.8 months (Interquartile Range (IQR), 34.9-47.8). Surveillance scans were first taken at a median of 12.1 months (IQR, 9.2-16) post-CRT. There were 27 (9.8%) patients who had a recurrence: 7 (2.5%) had locoregional recurrence (LR), 19 (6.9%) had distant metastasis (DM), and 1 (0.4%) had both LR and DM. LR was detected at a median of 5.8 months (IQR, 3.4-10.6) post-CRT and DM was detected at a median of 9.5 months (IQR, 4.8-14.3) post-CRT. Of all recurrences, 11/27 (40.7%) were first post-treatment scan detected, 10 (37.0%) were surveillance scan detected, 5 (18.5%) were clinical exam detected, and 1 (3.7%) was incidentally detected on lung cancer screening. Four (50%) LRs were first post-treatment detected (median time to detection, MTD: 4.2 months), 3 (37.5%) were clinical exam detected (MTD: 6.7 months), and 1 (12.5%) was surveillance detected (MTD: 9.0 months). For DM, 9 (45%) were surveillance detected (MTD: 12.7 months), 8 (40%) were first post-treatment detected (MTD: 4.1 months), 2 (10%) were clinical exam detected (MTD: 18.9 months), and 1 (5%) was incidentally detected (MTD: 12.1 months). A total of 702 surveillance scans were taken during the follow-up period. The number of surveillance scans needed to detect 1 LR/DM was 71 overall, 50 within 2 years and 254 beyond 2 years from CRT. CONCLUSION First post treatment scans detect most recurrences for HPV-associated OPC. A high burden of surveillance scans is needed to detect one recurrence, especially beyond 2 years from CRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Shang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - G Raab
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - L Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Y Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - A Shamseddine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - N Riaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - S M McBride
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - D Gelblum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - N Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - K Zakeri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Han J, Zakeri K, Raab G, Hesse J, Shamseddine A, Chen L, Yu Y, Kang JJ, McBride SM, Riaz N, Jillian Tsai C, Gelblum D, Sherman EJ, Wong RJ, Michel L, Lee NY. Concurrent carboplatin and paclitaxel definitive radiation therapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Head Neck 2023; 45:2207-2216. [PMID: 37439286 PMCID: PMC10981461 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 05/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We report the outcomes of cisplatin-ineligible HNSCC patients treated with definitive chemoradiation and concurrent carboplatin and paclitaxel. MATERIALS AND METHODS We included consecutive HNSCC patients treated from 2013 to 2021 that received definitive chemoradiation with carboplatin and paclitaxel. Locoregional recurrences (LRR) and distant metastases (DM) were estimated using cumulative incidence functions. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS Sixty-five patients were identified with median age of 71 years (range 44-85). Median radiation dose was 70 Gy and the median doses of carboplatin and paclitaxel were AUC 1 and 40 mg/m2 , respectively. At a median follow-up of 29 (range 5-91) months, the 2-year rates of LRR, DM, PFS, and OS were 8.8%, 9.4%, 72.2%, and 88.7%, respectively. In total, there were 5 LRR, 7 DM, and 12 deaths. CONCLUSIONS Chemoradiation with carboplatin and paclitaxel is an excellent option for cisplatin-ineligible HNSCC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gabriel Raab
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer Hesse
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Achraf Shamseddine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Linda Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yao Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jung Julie Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sean M. McBride
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nadeem Riaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - C. Jillian Tsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daphna Gelblum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric J. Sherman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Richard J. Wong
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Loren Michel
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nancy Y. Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Haddad RI, Harrington K, Tahara M, Szturz P, Le Tourneau C, Salmio S, Bajars M, Lee NY. Managing cisplatin-ineligible patients with resected, high-risk, locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Is there a standard of care? Cancer Treat Rev 2023; 119:102585. [PMID: 37392723 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/03/2023]
Abstract
For the past 2 decades, cisplatin-based adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has remained the standard of care for patients with resected, locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA SCCHN) who are at high risk of disease recurrence. However, many patients are deemed ineligible for cisplatin-based CRT because of poor performance status, advanced biological age, poor renal function, or hearing loss. Because outcomes with radiotherapy (RT) alone remain poor, patients at high risk of disease recurrence deemed ineligible to receive cisplatin are a population with a significant unmet medical need, and alternative systemic therapy options in combination with RT are urgently needed. Clinical guidelines and consensus documents have provided definitions for cisplatin ineligibility; however, areas of debate include thresholds for age and renal impairment and criteria for hearing loss. Furthermore, the proportion of patients with resected LA SCCHN who are cisplatin ineligible remains unclear. Because of a scarcity of clinical studies, treatment selection for patients with resected, high-risk LA SCCHN who are deemed ineligible to receive cisplatin is often based on clinical judgment, with few treatment options specified in international guidelines. In this review, we discuss considerations related to cisplatin ineligibility in patients with LA SCCHN, summarize the limited clinical evidence for adjuvant treatment of patients with resected high-risk disease, and highlight ongoing clinical trials that have the potential to provide new treatment options in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert I Haddad
- Department of Medical Oncology, Center for Head & Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
| | | | - Makoto Tahara
- National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba Prefecture, Japan.
| | - Petr Szturz
- Department of Oncology, University of Lausanne (UNIL) and Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Christophe Le Tourneau
- Department of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris-Saclay University, Paris, France.
| | | | | | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Singh A, Lee NY, Estilo CL. Osteoradionecrosis and Proton Therapy-Reply. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 149:761. [PMID: 37318798 PMCID: PMC10501163 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.1301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Annu Singh
- Dental Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan
Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nancy Y. Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering
Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Cherry L. Estilo
- Dental Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan
Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pennock M, Wei S, Cheng C, Lin H, Hasan S, Chhabra AM, Choi JI, Bakst RL, Kabarriti R, Simone II CB, Lee NY, Kang M, Press RH. Proton Bragg Peak FLASH Enables Organ Sparing and Ultra-High Dose-Rate Delivery: Proof of Principle in Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3828. [PMID: 37568644 PMCID: PMC10417542 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Proton pencil-beam scanning (PBS) Bragg peak FLASH combines ultra-high dose rate delivery and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing. This proof-of-principle study compared dosimetry and dose rate coverage between PBS Bragg peak FLASH and PBS transmission FLASH in head and neck reirradiation. PBS Bragg peak FLASH plans were created via the highest beam single energy, range shifter, and range compensator, and were compared to PBS transmission FLASH plans for 6 GyE/fraction and 10 GyE/fraction in eight recurrent head and neck patients originally treated with quad shot reirradiation (14.8/3.7 CGE). The 6 GyE/fraction and 10 GyE/fraction plans were also created using conventional-rate intensity-modulated proton therapy techniques. PBS Bragg peak FLASH, PBS transmission FLASH, and conventional plans were compared for OAR sparing, FLASH dose rate coverage, and target coverage. All FLASH OAR V40 Gy/s dose rate coverage was 90-100% at 6 GyE and 10 GyE for both FLASH modalities. PBS Bragg peak FLASH generated dose volume histograms (DVHs) like those of conventional therapy and demonstrated improved OAR dose sparing over PBS transmission FLASH. All the modalities had similar CTV coverage. PBS Bragg peak FLASH can deliver conformal, ultra-high dose rate FLASH with a two-millisecond delivery of the minimum MU per spot. PBS Bragg peak FLASH demonstrated similar dose rate coverage to PBS transmission FLASH with improved OAR dose-sparing, which was more pronounced in the 10 GyE/fraction than in the 6 GyE/fraction. This feasibility study generates hypotheses for the benefits of FLASH in head and neck reirradiation and developing biological models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Pennock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY 10461, USA;
| | - Shouyi Wei
- Department of Physics, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (S.W.); (H.L.); (S.H.); (M.K.)
| | - Chingyun Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA;
| | - Haibo Lin
- Department of Physics, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (S.W.); (H.L.); (S.H.); (M.K.)
| | - Shaakir Hasan
- Department of Physics, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (S.W.); (H.L.); (S.H.); (M.K.)
| | - Arpit M. Chhabra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (C.B.S.II)
| | - J. Isabelle Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (C.B.S.II)
| | - Richard L. Bakst
- Department of Radiation Oncology—Radiation Oncology Associates, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA;
| | - Rafi Kabarriti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY 10461, USA;
| | - Charles B. Simone II
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (C.B.S.II)
| | - Nancy Y. Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Minglei Kang
- Department of Physics, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (S.W.); (H.L.); (S.H.); (M.K.)
| | - Robert H. Press
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL 33176, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lee NY, Harris J, Kim J, Garden A, Mechalakos J, Pfister DG, Chan AT, Hu K, Colevas AD, Frank S, Shenouda G, Bar-Ad V, Waldron JN, Harari PM, Raben A, Torres-Saavedra P, Le QT. Long-term Outcomes of Bevacizumab and Chemoradiation for Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2316094. [PMID: 37266942 PMCID: PMC10238946 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.16094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance The long-term outcomes associated with adding bevacizumab, a vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor, to standard chemoradiation have continued to be favorable for a group of patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Objective To assess long-term toxic effects and clinical outcomes associated with chemotherapy, radiation therapy (RT), and bevacizumab for NPC. Design, Setting, and Participants This single-arm phase II nonrandomized controlled trial was conducted by the National Cancer Trials Network group and NRG Oncology (formerly Radiation Therapy Oncology Group), with accrual from December 13, 2006, to February 5, 2009, and data analysis from June 26 to July 1, 2019. The study was conducted at 19 cancer centers with a median (IQR) follow-up of 9.0 (7.7-9.3) years. Included patients were adults (aged ≥18 years) with NPC that was World Health Organization (WHO) histologic grade I to IIb or III, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage IIB or greater, and with or without lymph node involvement. Interventions Patients received 3 cycles of bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) concurrently with standard cisplatin (100 mg/m2) and RT (69.96 Gy) followed by 3 cycles of adjuvant bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) given concurrently with cisplatin (80 mg/m2) and fluorouracil (1000 mg/m2/d). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was grade 4 hemorrhage or grade 5 adverse events in the first year. Secondary end points were locoregional progression-free (LRPF) interval, distant metastasis-free (DMF) interval, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and other adverse events. Long-term toxic effects and clinical outcomes were reported due to the limited follow-up in the initial report for this trial and the importance of long-term outcomes when combining bevacizumab with chemoradiation. Results Among 46 patients with NPC who were enrolled, 44 patients were analyzed (29 males [65.9%]; 23 Asian [52.3%], 2 Black [4.5%], and 16 White [36.4%]; 38 not Hispanic [86.4%]; median [IQR] age, 48.5 [39.0-56.0] years). There were 33 patients with a Zubrod performance status of 0, indicating that they were fully functional and asymptomatic (75.0%); 32 patients with a WHO histologic grade of IIb or III (72.7%); and 39 patients with stage III or IVB disease (88.6%). Among analyzed patients, 42 individuals received radiation therapy of 69.96 Gy or greater (95.5%; dose range, 65.72-70.00 Gy); 30 patients received 3 cycles of cisplatin (68.2%) with RT, and 31 patients received 3 cycles of bevacizumab with RT (70.5%); this was followed by 3 cycles of adjuvant cisplatin in 21 patients (47.7%), fluorouracil in 24 patients (54.5%), and bevacizumab in 23 patients (52.3%). No grade 4 hemorrhage or grade 5 AEs were reported in the first year or thereafter. Late grade 3 AEs occurred in 16 patients (36.4%), including 7 patients with dysphagia (15.9%), 6 patients with hearing impairment (13.6%), and 2 patients with dry mouth (4.5%). The 1- and 5-year rates of feeding tube use were 5 of 41 patients (12.2%) and 0 of 27 patients, respectively. There were 19 patients (43.2%) who progressed or died without disease progression (6 patients with locoregional progression [13.6%], 8 patients with distant progression [18.2%], and 5 patients who died without progression [11.4%]). The 5- and 7-year rates were 79.5% (95% CI, 67.6%-91.5%) and 69.7% (95% CI, 55.9%-83.5%) for OS, 61.2% (95% CI, 46.8%-75.6%) and 56.3% (95% CI, 41.5%-71.1%) for PFS, 74.9% (95% CI, 61.4%-86.6%) and 72.3% (95% CI, 58.4%-84.7%) for LRPF interval, and 79.5% (95% CI,66.4%-90.0%) for both times for DMF interval. Among 13 patients who died, death was due to disease in 8 patients (61.5%). Conclusions and Relevance In this nonrandomized controlled trial, no grade 4 hemorrhage or grade 5 AEs were reported in the first year or thereafter among patients with NPC receiving bevacizumab combined with chemoradiation. The rate of distant metastasis was low although 89% of patients had stage III to IVB disease, suggesting that further investigation may be warranted. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00408694.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy Y. Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jonathan Harris
- Statistics and Data Management Center, NRG Oncology, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - John Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Adam Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - James Mechalakos
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David G. Pfister
- Department of Medicine Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Anthony T.C. Chan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Kenneth Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
- Accrual for State University of New York Health Science Center, Brooklyn, New York
| | - A Dimitrios Colevas
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
- Accruals for University of California, San Francisco
| | - Steven Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - George Shenouda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Voichita Bar-Ad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - John N. Waldron
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul M. Harari
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison
| | - Adam Raben
- Helen F. Graham Cancer Center, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Delaware
| | - Pedro Torres-Saavedra
- Statistics and Data Management Center, NRG Oncology, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Quynh-Thu Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Yu Y, Schöder H, Zakeri K, Chen L, Kang JJ, McBride SM, Tsai CJ, Gelblum DY, Boyle JO, Cracchiolo JR, Cohen MA, Singh B, Ganly I, Patel SG, Michel LS, Dunn L, Sherman EJ, Pfister DG, Wong RJ, Riaz N, Lee NY. Post-operative PET/CT improves the detection of early recurrence of squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity. Oral Oncol 2023; 141:106400. [PMID: 37099979 PMCID: PMC10631462 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2023.106400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We evaluate the impact of post-operative 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) for radiation planning on the detection of early recurrence (ER) and treatment outcomes in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients treated with post-operative radiation between 2005 and 2019 for OSCC at our institution. Extracapsular extension and positive surgical margins were classified as high risk features; pT3-4, node positivity, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, tumor thickness >5 mm, and close surgical margins were considered intermediate risk features. Patients with ER were identified. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for imbalances between baseline characteristics. RESULTS 391 patients with OSCC were treated with post-operative radiation. 237 (60.6%) patients underwent post-operative PET/CT planning vs. 154 (39.4%) who were planned with CT only. Patients screened with post-operative PET/CT were more likely to be diagnosed with ER than those planned with CT only (16.5 vs. 3.3%, p < 0.0001). Among patients with ER, those with intermediate features were more likely than those high risk features to undergo major treatment intensification, including re-operation, the addition of chemotherapy, or intensification of radiation by ≥ 10 Gy (91% vs. 9%, p < 0.0001). Post-operative PET/CT was associated with improved disease-free and overall survival for patients with intermediate risk features (IPTW log-rank p = 0.026 and p = 0.047, respectively) but not high risk features (IPTW log-rank p = 0.44 and p = 0.96). CONCLUSIONS Use of post-operative PET/CT is associated with increased detection of early recurrence. Among patients with intermediate risk features, this may translate to improved disease-free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yao Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Heiko Schöder
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Linda Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Jung Julie Kang
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, United States
| | - Sean Matthew McBride
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - C Jillian Tsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Canada
| | - Daphna Y Gelblum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Jay O Boyle
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | | | - Marc A Cohen
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Bhuvanesh Singh
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Ian Ganly
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Snehal G Patel
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Loren S Michel
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Lara Dunn
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Eric J Sherman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - David G Pfister
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Richard J Wong
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Nadeem Riaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Eita A, Mohamed N, Rybkin A, Kang JJ, Fiasconaro M, Zhigang Z, Zakeri K, Yu Y, Sadaka E, Sherman E, Dunn L, Cracchiolo J, Wong RJ, Cohen M, Lee NY. Outcomes for Organ Preservation with Chemoradiation Therapy for T4 Larynx and Hypopharynx Cancer. Laryngoscope 2023; 133:1138-1145. [PMID: 35801573 PMCID: PMC10547133 DOI: 10.1002/lary.30279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2022] [Revised: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Limited data is available to guide non-surgical management of Stage T4 larynx and hypopharynx cancer patients who have inoperable disease or refuse surgery. We aim to review the nonoperative management of T4 laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer and report the long-term therapeutic and functional outcomes. METHODS We reviewed the nonoperative management of T4 laryngeal (n = 44) and hypopharyngeal (n = 53) cancer from 1997 to 2015 and performed a univariate analysis (UVA). RESULTS The 2-/5-year OS rates were 73%/38% for larynx patients and 52%/29% for hypopharynx patients. Locoregional failure (LRF) occurred in 25% and 19% of larynx and hypopharynx patients, respectively. On UVA of the larynx subset, N3 nodal status and non-intensity-modulated radiation therapy were negatively associated with OS; treatment with radiation therapy alone impacted disease-free survival; and age >70 was associated with LRF. On UVA of the hypopharynx subset, only T4b status significantly impacted OS. In the larynx and hypopharynx groups, 68% and 85% received a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube and 32% and 40% received a tracheostomy tube, respectively. At the last follow-up visit, 66% of our larynx cohort had neither tracheostomy or PEG placed and 40% of our hypopharynx cohort had neither. CONCLUSION We report better than previously noted outcomes among T4 larynx and hypopharynx patients who have unresectable disease or refuse surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4 Laryngoscope, 133:1138-1145, 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amgad Eita
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, USA
| | - Nader Mohamed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, USA
| | - Alisa Rybkin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, USA
| | - Jung Julie Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, USA
| | - Megan Fiasconaro
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, USA
| | - Zhang Zhigang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, USA
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, USA
| | - Yao Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, USA
| | - Emad Sadaka
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt
| | - Eric Sherman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, USA
| | - Lara Dunn
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, USA
| | | | - Richard J. Wong
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, USA
| | - Marc Cohen
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, USA
| | - Nancy Y. Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kang JJ, Yu Y, Chen L, Zakeri K, Gelblum DY, McBride SM, Riaz N, Tsai CJ, Kriplani A, Hung T, Fetten JV, Dunn LA, Ho A, Boyle JO, Ganly IS, Singh B, Sherman EJ, Pfister DG, Wong RJ, Lee NY. Consensuses, controversies, and future directions in treatment deintensification for human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2023; 73:164-197. [PMID: 36305841 PMCID: PMC9992119 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Revised: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The most common cancer caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in the United States is oropharyngeal cancer (OPC), and its incidence has been rising since the turn of the century. Because of substantial long-term morbidities with chemoradiation and the favorable prognosis of HPV-positive OPC, identifying the optimal deintensification strategy for this group has been a keystone of academic head-and-neck surgery, radiation oncology, and medical oncology for over the past decade. However, the first generation of randomized chemotherapy deintensification trials failed to change the standard of care, triggering concern over the feasibility of de-escalation. National database studies estimate that up to one third of patients receive nonstandard de-escalated treatments, which have subspecialty-specific nuances. A synthesis of the multidisciplinary deintensification data and current treatment standards is important for the oncology community to reinforce best practices and ensure optimal patient outcomes. In this review, the authors present a summary and comparison of prospective HPV-positive OPC de-escalation trials. Chemotherapy attenuation compromises outcomes without reducing toxicity. Limited data comparing transoral robotic surgery (TORS) with radiation raise concern over toxicity and outcomes with TORS. There are promising data to support de-escalating adjuvant therapy after TORS, but consensus on treatment indications is needed. Encouraging radiation deintensification strategies have been reported (upfront dose reduction and induction chemotherapy-based patient selection), but level I evidence is years away. Ultimately, stage and HPV status may be insufficient to guide de-escalation. The future of deintensification may lie in incorporating intratreatment response assessments to harness the powers of personalized medicine and integrate real-time surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jung Julie Kang
- Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Therapeutic Radiology
| | - Yao Yu
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology
| | - Linda Chen
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology
| | | | | | - Nadeem Riaz
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology
| | - C. Jillian Tsai
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology
| | - Anuja Kriplani
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Medicine
| | - Tony Hung
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Medicine
| | - James V. Fetten
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Medicine
| | - Lara A. Dunn
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Medicine
| | - Alan Ho
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Medicine
| | - Jay O. Boyle
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Surgery
| | - Ian S. Ganly
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Surgery
| | - Bhuvanesh Singh
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Surgery
| | - Eric J. Sherman
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Medicine
| | | | - Richard J. Wong
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Surgery
| | - Nancy Y. Lee
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Press RH, Hu L, Huang S, Hasan S, Choi JI, Simone CB, Chhabra AM, Gelblum DY, Kabarriti R, Bakst RL, Cracchiolo JR, McBride SM, Lee NY. Dosimetric Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) for a Novel Oral Tongue Avoidance Concept in Low-Risk Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Tongue. Int J Part Ther 2023; 9:253-260. [PMID: 37169010 PMCID: PMC10166015 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-22-00032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose After adequate surgical resection, early-stage oral tongue cancer patients can harbor a low risk of local recurrence but remain at risk of regional recurrence. Oral tongue avoidance during adjuvant radiation therapy is an attractive potential treatment strategy to mitigate treatment toxicity. We sought to quantify the dosimetric advantages of this approach and hypothesized that intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) may further reduce organs at risk doses compared with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Materials and Methods Five patients with oral tongue cancer treated with postoperative radiation therapy from August 2020 to September 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Novel clinical target volume contours, excluding the oral tongue, were generated while maintaining coverage of bilateral at-risk lymph nodes. Comparison IMRT (X) and IMPT (PBT) plans were generated using standard treatment volumes (control) and avoidance volumes (study) (n = 4 plans/patient). Dosimetric variables for organs at risk were compared using the paired t test. Results The prescribed dose was 60 Gy in 30 fractions. D95% clinical target volume coverage was similar between X and PBT plans for both control and study clinical target volumes. Comparing control with study plans, both X (58.9 Gy vs 38.3 Gy, P = .007) and PBT (60.2 Gy vs 26.1 Gy, P < .001) decreased the oral cavity dosemean. The pharyngeal constrictor dosemean was also reduced (P < .003). There was no difference between control and study plans for larynx (P = .19), parotid (P = .11), or mandible dose (P = .59). For study plans, PBT significantly reduced oral cavity dosemean (38.3 Gy vs 26.1 Gy, P = .007) and parotid dosemean (23.3 Gy vs 19.3 Gy, P = .03) compared with X. For control plans, there was no difference in oral cavity dosemean using PBT compared with X, but PBT did improve the parotid dosemean (26.6 Gy vs 19.7 Gy, P = .02). Conclusion This study quantifies the feasibility and dosimetric advantages of oral tongue avoidance while still treating the at-risk lymph nodes for oral tongue cancer. The dosimetric difference between PBT and X was most prominent with an oral tongue-avoidance strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lei Hu
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Daphna Y Gelblum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rafi Kabarriti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Richard L Bakst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jen R Cracchiolo
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sean M McBride
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Sherman EJ, Harris J, Bible KC, Xia P, Ghossein RA, Chung CH, Riaz N, Gunn GB, Foote RL, Yom SS, Wong SJ, Koyfman SA, Dzeda MF, Clump DA, Khan SA, Shah MH, Redmond K, Torres-Saavedra PA, Le QT, Lee NY. Radiotherapy and paclitaxel plus pazopanib or placebo in anaplastic thyroid cancer (NRG/RTOG 0912): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:175-186. [PMID: 36681089 PMCID: PMC9969528 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00763-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Revised: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anaplastic thyroid cancer is a rare and aggressive cancer with no standard radiotherapy-based local treatment. Based on data suggesting synergy between pazopanib and paclitaxel in anaplastic thyroid cancer, NRG Oncology did a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised phase 2 clinical trial comparing concurrent paclitaxel and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with the addition of pazopanib or placebo with the aim of improving overall survival in this patient population. METHODS Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with a pathological diagnosis of anaplastic thyroid cancer, any TNM stage, Zubrod performance status of 0-2, no recent haemoptysis or bleeding, and no brain metastases. Patients were enrolled from 34 centres in the USA. Initially, a run-in was done to establish safety. In the randomised phase 2 trial, patients in the experimental group (pazopanib) received 2-3 weeks of weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) intravenously and daily pazopanib suspension 400 mg orally followed by concurrent weekly paclitaxel (50 mg/m2), daily pazopanib (300 mg), and IMRT 66 Gy given in 33 daily fractions (2 Gy fractions). In the control group (placebo), pazopanib was replaced by matching placebo. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to the two treatment groups by permuted block randomisation by NRG Oncology with stratification by metastatic disease. All investigators, patients, and funders of the study were masked to group allocation. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01236547, and is complete. FINDINGS The safety run-showed the final dosing regimen to be safe based on two out of nine participants having adverse events of predefined concern. Between June 23, 2014, and Dec 30, 2016, 89 patients were enrolled to the phase 2 trial, of whom 71 were eligible (36 in the pazopanib group and 35 in the placebo group; 34 [48%] males and 37 [52%] females). At the final analysis (data cutoff March 9, 2020), with a median follow-up of 2·9 years (IQR 0·002-4·0), 61 patients had died. Overall survival was not significantly improved with pazopanib versus placebo, with a median overall survival of 5·7 months (95% CI 4·0-12·8) in the pazopanib group versus 7·3 months (4·3-10·6) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·86, 95% CI 0·52-1·43; one-sided log-rank p=0·28). 1-year overall survival was 37·1% (95% CI 21·1-53·2) in the pazopanib group and 29·0% (13·2-44·8) in the placebo group. The incidence of grade 3-5 adverse events did not differ significantly between the treatment groups (pazopanib 88·9% [32 of 36 patients] and placebo 85·3% [29 of 34 patients]; p=0·73). The most common clinically significant grade 3-4 adverse events in the 70 eligible treated patients (36 in the pazopanib group and 34 in the placebo group) were dysphagia (13 [36%] vs 10 [29%]), radiation dermatitis (8 [22%] vs 13 [38%]), increased alanine aminotransferase (12 [33%] vs none), increased aspartate aminotransferase (eight [22%] vs none), and oral mucositis (five [14%] vs eight [24%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported for 16 (44%) patients on pazopanib and 12 (35%) patients on placebo. The most common serious adverse events were dehydration and thromboembolic event (three [8%] each) in patients on pazopanib and oral mucositis (three [8%]) in those on placebo. There was one treatment-related death in each group (sepsis in the pazopanib group and pneumonitis in the placebo group). INTERPRETATION To our knowledge, this study is the largest randomised anaplastic thyroid cancer study that has completed accrual showing feasibility in a multicenter NCI National Clinical Trials Network setting. Although no significant improvement in overall survival was recorded in the pazopanib group, the treatment combination was shown to be feasible and safe, and hypothesis-generating data that might warrant further investigation were generated. FUNDING National Cancer Institute and Novartis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric J Sherman
- Department of Medicine, Division of Head and Neck Oncology, Solid Tumor Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medicine and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Jonathan Harris
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Ping Xia
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ronald A Ghossein
- Department of Medicine, Division of Head and Neck Oncology, Solid Tumor Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Nadeem Riaz
- Department of Medicine, Division of Head and Neck Oncology, Solid Tumor Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - G Brandon Gunn
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Sue S Yom
- Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Michael F Dzeda
- Christiana Care Health System-Helen F Graham Cancer Center & Research Institute, Newark, DE, USA
| | | | - Saad A Khan
- UT Southwestern Harold C Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Manisha H Shah
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, OSU Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Kevin Redmond
- Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati-Barrett Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Pedro A Torres-Saavedra
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Quynh-Thu Le
- Stanford Cancer Institute Palo Alto, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Medicine, Division of Head and Neck Oncology, Solid Tumor Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Singh A, Kitpanit S, Neal B, Yorke E, White C, Yom SK, Randazzo JD, Wong RJ, Huryn JM, Tsai CJ, Zakeri K, Lee NY, Estilo CL. Osteoradionecrosis of the Jaw Following Proton Radiation Therapy for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 149:151-159. [PMID: 36547968 PMCID: PMC9912132 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.4165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Importance Proton radiation therapy (PRT) has reduced radiation-induced toxic effects, such as mucositis and xerostomia, over conventional photon radiation therapy, leading to significantly improved quality of life in patients with head and neck cancers. However, the prevalence of osteoradionecrosis (ORN) of the jaw following PRT in these patients is less clear. Objective To report the prevalence and clinical characteristics of ORN in patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer (OOPC) treated with PRT. Design, Setting, and Participants This case series reports a single-institution experience (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York) between November 2013 and September 2019 and included 122 radiation therapy-naive patients with OOPC treated with PRT. Data were analyzed from 2013 to 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures Clinical parameters, including sex, age, comorbidities, tumor histology, concurrent chemotherapy, smoking, comorbidities, and preradiation dental evaluation, were obtained from the medical record. Patients with clinical or radiographic signs of ORN were identified and graded using the adopted modified Glanzmann and Grätz grading system. Characteristics of ORN, such as location, clinical presentation, initial stage at diagnosis, etiology, time to diagnosis, management, and clinical outcome at the last follow-up, were also collected. Results Of the 122 patients (mean [SD] age, 63 [13] years; 45 [36.9%] women and 77 [63.1%] men) included in this study, 13 (10.6%) developed ORN following PRT during a median (range) follow-up time of 40.6 (<1-101) months. All patients had spontaneous development of ORN. At the time of initial diagnosis, grade 0, grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 ORN were seen in 2, 1, 9, and 1 patient, respectively. The posterior ipsilateral mandible within the radiation field that received the full planned PRT dose was the most involved ORN site. At a median (range) follow-up of 13.5 (0.2-58.0) months from the time of ORN diagnosis, complete resolution, stable condition, and progression of ORN were seen in 3, 6, and 4 patients, respectively. The 3-year rates of ORN and death in the total cohort were 5.2% and 21.5%, while the 5-year rates of ORN and death were 11.5% and 34.4%, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance In this case series, the prevalence of ORN following PRT was found to be 10.6%, indicating that ORN remains a clinical challenge even in the era of highly conformal PRT. Clinicians treating patients with OOPC with PRT should be mindful of this complication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annu Singh
- Dental Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sarin Kitpanit
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Pathumwan, Bangkok
| | - Brian Neal
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, New Jersey
| | - Ellen Yorke
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Charlie White
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - SaeHee K. Yom
- Dental Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Joseph D. Randazzo
- Dental Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Richard J. Wong
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Joseph M. Huryn
- Dental Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Dental Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Chiaojung Jillian Tsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nancy Y. Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Cherry L. Estilo
- Dental Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lee A, Woods R, Mahfouz A, Kitpanit S, Cartano O, Mohamed N, Youssef I, Marqueen K, Sine K, Mah D, Neal B, Zakeri K, Kang JJ, Riaz N, Yu Y, McBride SM, Chen LD, Tsai CJ, Gelblum DY, Press RH, Michel LS, Sherman EJ, Pfister D, Dunn LA, Ho AL, Fetten J, Wong RJ, Boyle JO, Singh B, Cracchiolo JR, Ganly I, Cohen MA, Lee NY. Evaluation of Proton Therapy Reirradiation for Patients With Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2250607. [PMID: 36689229 PMCID: PMC9871797 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Use of proton therapy reirradiation (PT-ReRT) for head and neck cancer is increasing; however, reports are heterogenous and outcomes can be difficult to interpret. Objective To evaluate outcomes and toxic effects following PT-ReRT in a uniform and consecutive cohort of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study included patients with recurrent primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who were treated with PT-ReRT from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2020, at a single institution. Patient, clinical, and treatment characteristics were obtained, and multidisciplinary review was performed to record and grade early and late toxic effects. Exposures Proton therapy reirradiation. Main Outcomes and Measures Follow-up was defined from the start of PT-ReRT. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for outcomes of interest, including local control (LC), locoregional control, distant metastatic control, progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to assess associations of covariates with OS. Results A total of 242 patients (median [range] age, 63 [21-96] years; 183 [75.6%] male) were included. Of these patients, 231 (95.9%) had a Karnofsky performance status score of 70 or higher, and 145 (59.9%) had at least a 10-pack-year smoking history. Median (range) follow-up was 12.0 (5.8-26.0) months for all patients and 24.5 (13.8-37.8) months for living patients. A total of 206 patients (85.1%) had recurrent disease vs second primary or residual disease. The median (range) interval between radiation courses was 22 (1-669) months. Median PT-ReRT dose was 70 cobalt gray equivalents (CGE) for the fractionated cohort and 44.4 CGE for the quad shot cohort. For the fractionated cohort, the 1-year LC was 71.8% (95% CI, 62.8%-79.0%) and the 1-year OS was 66.6% (95% CI, 58.1%-73.8%). For the quad shot cohort, the 1-year LC was 61.6% (95% CI, 46.4%-73.6%) and the 1-year OS was 28.5% (95% CI, 19.4%-38.3%). Higher Karnofsky performance status scores (hazard ratio [HR], 0.50; 95% CI, 0.25-0.99; P = .046) and receipt of salvage surgery prior to PT-ReRT (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.39-0.84; P = .005) were associated with improved OS, whereas receipt of quad shot (HR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.36-2.86; P < .001) was associated with worse OS. There were a total of 73 grade 3 and 6 grade 4 early toxic effects. There were 79 potential grade 3, 4 grade 4, and 5 grade 5 late toxic effects. Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this cohort study suggest that, compared with previous reports with photon-based reirradiation, patients are living longer with aggressive PT-ReRT; however, surviving patients remain at risk of early and late complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Robbie Woods
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Amgad Mahfouz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sarin Kitpanit
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Olivia Cartano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nader Mohamed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Irini Youssef
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kathryn Marqueen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kevin Sine
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, New Jersey
| | - Dennis Mah
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, New Jersey
| | - Brian Neal
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, New Jersey
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jung J. Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nadeem Riaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yao Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sean M. McBride
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Linda D. Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - C. Jillian Tsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daphna Y. Gelblum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Loren S. Michel
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Eric J. Sherman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David Pfister
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Lara A. Dunn
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Alan L. Ho
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - James Fetten
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Richard J. Wong
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jay O. Boyle
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Bhuvanesh Singh
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Ian Ganly
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Marc A. Cohen
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nancy Y. Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Klochikhin A, Haddad RI, Meirovitz A, Safina S, Brana I, Le Tourneau C, Uppaluri R, Lee NY, Cohen EE, Chernock R, Westra W, Liu H, Gumuscu B, Benjamin K, Adkins D. KEYNOTE-689: A Phase 3 Study of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Pembrolizumab Plus Standard of Care (SOC) in Resectable, Locally Advanced (LA) Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC). Eur J Surg Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.11.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
|
32
|
Schmalbach CE, Ow TJ, Choi KY, O'Leary M, Lin A, Hughley BB, Emerick KS, Moore B, Lee NY, Zandberg DP, Wang SJ. American Head and Neck Society position statement on the use of PD-1 inhibitors for treatment of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2023; 45:32-41. [PMID: 36181317 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A position statement put forth by the American Head and Neck Society (AHNS) was constructed to provide evidence-based treatment recommendations for PD-1 inhibitor use in advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Secondarily, we sought to identify knowledge gaps warranting further investigation. METHODS A literature search utilizing key terms: cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, cutaneous cancer, checkpoint inhibitors, systemic therapy, Program Cell Death, PD-1 (PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar) was carried out to generate evidence-based statements. The statements were distributed among the AHNS membership. Delphi methodology was applied to identify statements achieving 70% or greater consensus among the leadership team. RESULTS Twenty-six position statements achieved consensus. Knowledge gaps for future research included: impact of immunosuppression on cSCC staging and associated treatment; role of PD-1 inhibitors in immunosuppressed patients. CONCLUSION This comprehensive position statement put forth by the AHNS represents majority consensus by practicing head and neck surgeons throughout the country.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecelia E Schmalbach
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Thomas J Ow
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Karen Y Choi
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Miriam O'Leary
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alice Lin
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Kevin S Emerick
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Brian Moore
- Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Head and Neck Radiation Oncology, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Dan P Zandberg
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Steven J Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Yu Y, Sherman EJ, Lee NY. Methodologic Concerns in Secondary Analysis of KEYNOTE-048-Reply. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:1854-1855. [PMID: 36264562 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.5071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yao Yu
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Eric J Sherman
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Lee VHF, Adham M, Ben Kridis W, Bossi P, Chen MY, Chitapanarux I, Gregoire V, Hao SP, Ho C, Ho GF, Kannarunimit D, Kwong DLW, Lam KO, Lam WKJ, Le QT, Lee AWM, Lee NY, Leung TW, Licitra L, Lim DWT, Lin JC, Loh KS, Lou PJ, Machiels JP, Mai HQ, Mesía R, Ng WT, Ngan RKC, Tay JK, Tsang RKY, Tong CC, Wang HM, Wee JT. International recommendations for plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA measurement in nasopharyngeal carcinoma in resource-constrained settings: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:e544-e551. [PMID: 36455583 PMCID: PMC9704820 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00505-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Revised: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic continue to constrain health-care staff and resources worldwide, despite the availability of effective vaccines. Aerosol-generating procedures such as endoscopy, a common investigation tool for nasopharyngeal carcinoma, are recognised as a likely cause of SARS-CoV-2 spread in hospitals. Plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA is considered the most accurate biomarker for the routine management of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. A consensus statement on whether plasma EBV DNA can minimise the need for or replace aerosol-generating procedures, imaging methods, and face-to-face consultations in managing nasopharyngeal carcinoma is urgently needed amid the current pandemic and potentially for future highly contagious airborne diseases or natural disasters. We completed a modified Delphi consensus process of three rounds with 33 international experts in otorhinolaryngology or head and neck surgery, radiation oncology, medical oncology, and clinical oncology with vast experience in managing nasopharyngeal carcinoma, representing 51 international professional societies and national clinical trial groups. These consensus recommendations aim to enhance consistency in clinical practice, reduce ambiguity in delivering care, and offer advice for clinicians worldwide who work in endemic and non-endemic regions of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, in the context of COVID-19 and other airborne pandemics, and in future unexpected settings of severe resource constraints and insufficiency of personal protective equipment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Ho-Fun Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China,Clinical Oncology Center, The University of Hong Kong–Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China,Correspondence to:Dr Victor Ho-Fun Lee, Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Marlinda Adham
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia–Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Wala Ben Kridis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Habib Bourguiba Hospital, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia
| | - Paolo Bossi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health–Medical Oncology, University of Brescia, ASST–Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy,Head and Neck Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Ming-Yuan Chen
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat–sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Imjai Chitapanarux
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Vincent Gregoire
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Sheng Po Hao
- Department of Otolaryngology, Shin Kong Wu Ho–Su Memorial Hospital, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Cheryl Ho
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Gwo Fuang Ho
- Clinical Oncology Unit, University Malaya Cancer Centre, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Danita Kannarunimit
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Dora Lai-Wan Kwong
- Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China,Clinical Oncology Center, The University of Hong Kong–Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Ka-On Lam
- Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China,Clinical Oncology Center, The University of Hong Kong–Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Wai Kei Jacky Lam
- Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China,Department of Chemical Pathology, State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, and Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Quynh-Thu Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Anne Wing-Mui Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China,Clinical Oncology Center, The University of Hong Kong–Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - To-Wai Leung
- Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China,Clinical Oncology Center, The University of Hong Kong–Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Lisa Licitra
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy,Department of Oncology and Hemato–Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Jin-Ching Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Kwok Seng Loh
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Pei-Jen Lou
- Department of Otolaryngology, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan,Graduate Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jean-Pascal Machiels
- Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Institut Roi Albert II, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hai-Qiang Mai
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat–sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ricard Mesía
- Medical Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology–Badalona, B–ARGO Group, IGTP, Badalona, Spain
| | - Wai-Tong Ng
- Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China,Clinical Oncology Center, The University of Hong Kong–Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Roger Kai-Cheong Ngan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China,Clinical Oncology Center, The University of Hong Kong–Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Joshua K Tay
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Raymond King-Yin Tsang
- Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China,Department of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chi-Chung Tong
- Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Hung-Ming Wang
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Joseph T Wee
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Yang JT, Wijetunga NA, Pentsova E, Wolden S, Young RJ, Correa D, Zhang Z, Zheng J, Steckler A, Bucwinska W, Bernstein A, Betof Warner A, Yu H, Kris MG, Seidman AD, Wilcox JA, Malani R, Lin A, DeAngelis LM, Lee NY, Powell SN, Boire A. Randomized Phase II Trial of Proton Craniospinal Irradiation Versus Photon Involved-Field Radiotherapy for Patients With Solid Tumor Leptomeningeal Metastasis. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:3858-3867. [PMID: 35802849 PMCID: PMC9671756 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Revised: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Photon involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) is the standard-of-care radiotherapy for patients with leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) from solid tumors. We tested whether proton craniospinal irradiation (pCSI) encompassing the entire CNS would result in superior CNS progression-free survival (PFS) compared with IFRT. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a randomized, phase II trial of pCSI versus IFRT in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and breast cancers with LM. We enrolled patients with other solid tumors to an exploratory pCSI group. For the randomized groups, patients were assigned (2:1), stratified by histology and systemic disease status, to pCSI or IFRT. The primary end point was CNS PFS. Secondary end points included overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events (TAEs). RESULTS Between April 16, 2020, and October 11, 2021, 42 and 21 patients were randomly assigned to pCSI and IFRT, respectively. At planned interim analysis, a significant benefit in CNS PFS was observed with pCSI (median 7.5 months; 95% CI, 6.6 months to not reached) compared with IFRT (2.3 months; 95% CI, 1.2 to 5.8 months; P < .001). We also observed OS benefit with pCSI (9.9 months; 95% CI, 7.5 months to not reached) versus IFRT (6.0 months; 95% CI, 3.9 months to not reached; P = .029). There was no difference in the rate of grade 3 and 4 TAEs (P = .19). In the exploratory pCSI group, 35 patients enrolled, the median CNS PFS was 5.8 months (95% CI, 4.4 to 9.1 months) and OS was 6.6 months (95% CI, 5.4 to 11 months). CONCLUSION Compared with photon IFRT, we found pCSI improved CNS PFS and OS for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and breast cancer with LM with no increase in serious TAEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan T. Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - N. Ari Wijetunga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Elena Pentsova
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Suzanne Wolden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Robert J. Young
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Denise Correa
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Zhigang Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Junting Zheng
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Alexa Steckler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Weronika Bucwinska
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ashley Bernstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Allison Betof Warner
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Melanoma and Immunotherapeutics Service, New York, NY
| | - Helena Yu
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Thoracic Oncology Service, New York, NY
| | - Mark G. Kris
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Thoracic Oncology Service, New York, NY
| | - Andrew D. Seidman
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Breast Medicine Service, New York, NY
| | - Jessica A. Wilcox
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Rachna Malani
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Andrew Lin
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Lisa M. DeAngelis
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Nancy Y. Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Simon N. Powell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Adrienne Boire
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Brain Tumor Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Youssef I, Yoon J, Mohamed N, Zakeri K, Press RH, Chen L, Gelblum DY, McBride SM, Tsai CJ, Riaz N, Yu Y, Cohen MA, Dunn LA, Ho AL, Wong RJ, Michel LS, Boyle JO, Singh B, Kriplani A, Ganly I, Sherman EJ, Pfister DG, Fetten J, Lee NY. Toxicity Profiles and Survival Outcomes Among Patients With Nonmetastatic Oropharyngeal Carcinoma Treated With Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy vs Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2241538. [PMID: 36367724 PMCID: PMC9652753 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.41538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) treated with radiotherapy often experience substantial toxic effects, even with modern techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) has a potential advantage over IMRT due to reduced dose to the surrounding organs at risk; however, data are scarce given the limited availability and use of IMPT. OBJECTIVE To compare toxic effects and oncologic outcomes among patients with newly diagnosed nonmetastatic OPC treated with IMPT vs IMRT with or without chemotherapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective cohort study included patients aged 18 years or older with newly diagnosed nonmetastatic OPC who received curative-intent radiotherapy with IMPT or IMRT at a single-institution tertiary academic cancer center from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021, with follow-up through December 31, 2021. EXPOSURES IMPT or IMRT with or without chemotherapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The main outcomes were the incidence of acute and chronic (present after ≥6 months) treatment-related adverse events (AEs) and oncologic outcomes, including locoregional recurrence (LRR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Fisher exact tests and χ2 tests were used to evaluate associations between toxic effects and treatment modality (IMPT vs IMRT), and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare LRR, PFS, and OS between the 2 groups. RESULTS The study included 292 patients with OPC (272 [93%] with human papillomavirus [HPV]-p16-positive tumors); 254 (87%) were men, 38 (13%) were women, and the median age was 64 years (IQR, 58-71 years). Fifty-eight patients (20%) were treated with IMPT, and 234 (80%) were treated with IMRT. Median follow-up was 26 months (IQR, 17-36 months). Most patients (283 [97%]) received a dose to the primary tumor of 70 Gy. Fifty-seven of the patients treated with IMPT (98%) and 215 of those treated with IMRT (92%) had HPV-p16-positive disease. There were no significant differences in 3-year OS (97% IMPT vs 91% IMRT; P = .18), PFS (82% IMPT vs 85% IMRT; P = .62), or LRR (5% IMPT vs 4% IMRT; P = .59). The incidence of acute toxic effects was significantly higher for IMRT compared with IMPT for oral pain of grade 2 or greater (42 [72%] IMPT vs 217 [93%] IMRT; P < .001), xerostomia of grade 2 or greater (12 [21%] IMPT vs 68 [29%] IMRT; P < .001), dysgeusia of grade 2 or greater (16 [28%] IMPT vs 134 [57%] IMRT; P < .001), grade 3 dysphagia (4 [7%] IMPT vs 29 [12%] IMRT; P < .001), mucositis of grade 3 or greater (10 [53%] IMPT vs 13 [70%] IMRT; P = .003), nausea of grade 2 or greater (0 [0%] IMPT vs 18 [8%] IMRT; P = .04), and weight loss of grade 2 or greater (22 [37%] IMPT vs 138 [59%] IMRT; P < .001). There were no significant differences in chronic toxic effects of grade 3 or greater, although there was a significant difference for chronic xerostomia of grade 2 or greater (6 IMPT [11%] vs 22 IMRT [10%]; P < .001). Four patients receiving IMRT (2%) vs 0 receiving IMPT had a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube for longer than 6 months. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study, curative-intent radiotherapy with IMPT for nonmetastatic OPC was associated with a significantly reduced acute toxicity burden compared with IMRT, with few chronic toxic effects and favorable oncologic outcomes, including locoregional recurrence of only 5% at 2 years. Prospective randomized clinical trials comparing these 2 technologies and of patient-reported outcomes are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irini Youssef
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York
| | - Jennifer Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick
| | - Nader Mohamed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Linda Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daphna Y. Gelblum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sean M. McBride
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Chiaojung Jillian Tsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nadeem Riaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yao Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Marc A. Cohen
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Lara Ann Dunn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Alan L. Ho
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Richard J. Wong
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Loren S. Michel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jay O. Boyle
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Bhuvanesh Singh
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Anuja Kriplani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ian Ganly
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Eric J. Sherman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David G. Pfister
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - James Fetten
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nancy Y. Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Restifo D, Raab G, McBride SM, Pfister DG, Wong RJ, Lee NY, Shahrokni A, Zakeri K. Correlation of an Electronic Geriatric Assessment With Receipt of Adjuvant Radiation and Chemotherapy in Older Adults With Head and Neck Cancer. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 8:101096. [PMID: 36483055 PMCID: PMC9723299 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Treatment patterns for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) vary among older adults because of concerns about their health status. Geriatric assessment may guide treatment for older adults with HNSCC by assessing their health status. Methods and Materials We conducted a retrospective review of adjuvant treatment received by older patients with HNSCC who completed a novel geriatric assessment, the electronic Rapid Fitness Assessment, before treatment. The electronic Rapid Fitness Assessment yields an accumulated geriatric deficits (AGD) score. Higher AGD score indicates greater frailty. Comparators were age and performance status. The Wilcoxon rank sum test compared differences between those who did and did not receive adjuvant radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Results The cohort included 73 patients, of whom 56 (77%) had oral cavity cancer. The most common geriatric deficits were major distress, social activity limitation, depression, and impaired activities of daily living. AGD score, age, and performance status were not associated with receipt of adjuvant radiation. Patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy had a significantly lower median AGD score than those who did not (3 vs 6; P = .044), but there was no association with age and performance status. Of the 17 patients with newly diagnosed disease and either positive margins or extranodal extension, only 9 received adjuvant radiation and only 3 received systemic therapy. Most often, systemic therapy was omitted because of patient preference or comorbidities and poor performance status. There was a nonstatistically significant lower AGD score between patients who did and did not receive standard fractionated radiation therapy (median, 4 vs 6.5; P = .13). Conclusions Receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with frailty. Rates of chemotherapy utilization were very low, indicating the need for novel strategies to mitigate the toxicity burden in this patient population. Receipt of adjuvant radiation therapy was not associated with frailty; however, there was a trend toward lower frailty among those who did receive radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gabriel Raab
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | | | | | - Richard J. Wong
- Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Armin Shahrokni
- Geriatrics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Departments of Radiation Oncology,Corresponding author: Kaveh Zakeri, MD, MAS
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Adilbay D, Yuan A, Romesser PB, Wong RJ, Shah JP, Shaha AR, Tuttle MR, Patel S, Lee NY, Ganly I. Well-Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: Who Should Get Postoperative Radiation? Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:5582-5590. [PMID: 35583688 PMCID: PMC10120572 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11898-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The mainstay of treatment of well-differentiated thyroid cancer (WDTC) is surgery followed by adjuvant radioactive iodine therapy. Postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) is rarely used. OBJECTIVE The aim of our study was to report our experience of patients with WDTC who were selected to receive PORT. MATERIALS AND METHODS After Institutional Review Board approval, patients who received PORT were identified from a departmental database of 6259 patients with WDTC treated with primary surgery from 1986 to 2015. We carried out propensity matching to compare outcomes with a cohort of patients who did not receive PORT. The main outcome of interest was central neck recurrence-free probability (CNRFP), while secondary outcomes were lateral neck recurrence-free probability (LNRFP), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS From 6259 patients, 32 (0.5%) patients with a median age of 65.2 years received PORT. Tall-cell variant papillary thyroid carcinoma was the most common pathology (45%). Patients who received PORT had no difference in CNRFP compared with patients treated without PORT (10-year CNRFP 88% vs. 73%; p = 0.18). Furthermore, patients who received PORT had superior LNRFP (10-year LNRFP 100% vs. 62%; p = 0.001) compared with the no-PORT cohort. Despite this, patients who received PORT had similar DSS (71% PORT vs. 75% no-PORT) and OS (65% PORT vs. 58% no-PORT group) as the no-PORT cohort. CONCLUSIONS Our data show that select patients who received PORT had improved locoregional recurrence-free probability; however, this did not translate into improved DSS and OS. At our institution, we recommend the use of PORT only in highly selected patients with locally advanced primary tumors who are deemed to have a high risk of central neck recurrence for which salvage surgery would result in unacceptable risk to the airway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dauren Adilbay
- Department of Surgery, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Avery Yuan
- Department of Surgery, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paul B Romesser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Early Drug Development, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Early Drug Development, New York, NY, USA
| | - Richard J Wong
- Department of Surgery, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jatin P Shah
- Department of Surgery, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ashok R Shaha
- Department of Surgery, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael R Tuttle
- Department of Medicine, Endocrine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Snehal Patel
- Department of Surgery, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ian Ganly
- Department of Surgery, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Yu Y, Zakeri K, Sherman EJ, Lee NY. Association of Low and Intermediate Combined Positive Scores With Outcomes of Treatment With Pembrolizumab in Patients With Recurrent and Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Secondary Analysis of Keynote 048. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:1216-1218. [PMID: 35679031 PMCID: PMC9185518 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.1846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yao Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Eric J Sherman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Head and Neck Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Barker CA, Lee NY. Regaud, Rare Skin Cancer, and Radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 113:913-914. [PMID: 35841916 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.04.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher A Barker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Youssef I, Yoon J, Mohamed N, Zakeri K, Press RH, Yu Y, Kang JJ, Wong RJ, Tuttle RM, Shaha A, Sherman E, Lee NY. Outcomes and Toxicities of Nonmedullary Thyroid Tumors Treated with Proton Beam Radiation Therapy. Int J Part Ther 2022; 9:20-30. [PMID: 36060412 PMCID: PMC9415751 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-22-00005.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Proton therapy is an emerging therapy for several malignancies owing to its favorable therapeutic ratio. There are very limited data on the use of proton therapy in the management of thyroid carcinoma. Our objective was to review the safety, feasibility, and outcomes of proton therapy for patients with thyroid cancer treated to the head and neck. Methods From our institution's proton database from 2012 to 2021, we identified 22 patients with thyroid cancer treated with proton beam therapy. We evaluated outcomes and toxicities. Results Median follow-up was 26 months. Of the 22 patients, 50% were female. The mean age was 65 years. Three patients had anaplastic cancer; 13, papillary carcinoma; 2, follicular carcinoma; and 2, poorly differentiated carcinoma. Forty-six percent had T4 disease. Primary targets were the central neck compartment, level VI, and upper mediastinum. Radiation dose was 60 GyRBE adjuvantly, and 70 GyRBE for gross disease (range, 6000-7600 GyRBE). Eight patients underwent upfront adjuvant radiation, and 3 received definitive radiation for unresectable disease upfront. Eleven patients received either salvage or palliative radiation. Fifty-nine percent of patients had extrathyroidal extension, and 64% of patients had gross disease in the neck before treatment. Fifty percent of patients had metastatic disease before treatment. Sixteen patients received concurrent chemotherapy, 63% of these patients received doxorubicin. For all patients, 1-year local regional recurrence (LRR) was 0%, and overall survival (OS) was 90%. Acute grade 3+ toxicities occurred in 27% of patients, the most frequent being dermatitis (27%). Three patients required a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube after radiation therapy (RT), 2 owing to progression. There were no grade 4+ toxicities. Conclusions Proton therapy for thyroid cancer appears feasible and effective with minimal toxicities. Prospective studies comparing proton therapy with intensity-modulated RT, to evaluate the clinical efficacy of using proton therapy to reduce toxicities in patients undergoing radiation for thyroid cancer, are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irini Youssef
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Nader Mohamed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Yao Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jung Julie Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Richard J. Wong
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - R. Michael Tuttle
- Department of Endocrinology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ashok Shaha
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric Sherman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nancy Y. Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Lee NY, Riaz N, Wu V, Brinkman T, Tsai CJ, Zhi W, Fetten J, Ho A, Wong RJ, Ghossein R, Tuttle M, Fagin J, Pfister DG, Sherman E. A Pilot Study of Durvalumab (MEDI4736) with Tremelimumab in Combination with Image-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Metastatic Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid 2022; 32:799-806. [PMID: 35521657 PMCID: PMC9293682 DOI: 10.1089/thy.2022.0050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Background: Metastatic anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) has a poor prognosis. This pilot study aims to evaluate tremelimumab plus durvalumab with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to improve overall survival (OS). Methods: Eligible patients received up to 4 doses tremelimumab (75 mg) given q4 weeks and up to 1 year of durvalumab (1500 mg) given q4 weeks. SBRT at 9 Gy × 3 fractions was given within the first 2 weeks of the start of treatment. Paired biopsies (pretreatment and between 3 and 10 weeks after the first dose of the drug treatment) were done in the medically qualified patients. Major inclusion criteria are metastatic ATC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2, no prior immunotherapy, and last anticancer treatment >7 days before starting the study. The primary endpoint was 1 year OS with the combination of durvalumab, tremelimumab, and SBRT in metastatic ATC patients with a target of 1 year OS in ≥2 out of 12 patients. Results: A total of 13 patients signed consent but only 12 patients ultimately participated in this trial. One patient who consented to the protocol became ineligible for this study due to continued decline in performance status. Patient characteristics were as follows: male (n = 6) with a median age of 71 years (range: 49-82), and ECOG = 1. Nine patients had prior neck radiation and nine patients had prior chemotherapy. Next-generation sequencing and PD-L1 staining were done in the nine patients where tissue was available. High microsatellite instability (MSI) corresponding to mismatch repair defect was noted in two patients. There were zero confirmed responses and only one patient had stable disease and was treated with ≥4 cycles of study drugs. The median time that the patients were under treatment was 11 weeks (1-28 weeks). MSI status did not affect treatment response. High MSI patients were on treatment for 8-14 weeks before disease progression. The median OS was 14.5 weeks with only 1 patient alive beyond 1 year. The presence of a BRAF or p53 mutation did not appear to affect treatment outcome. Conclusions: Tremelimumab and durvalumab with SBRT did not improve OS for ATC. Future research is needed to examine other novel immunotherapy combinations with or without radiotherapy in the treatment of ATC. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03122496.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy Y. Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MSKCC, New York, New York, USA
- Address correspondence to: Nancy Y. Lee, MD, FASTRO, Department of Radiation Oncology, MSKCC, 1275 York Avenue Box 22, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Nadeem Riaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MSKCC, New York, New York, USA
| | - Vanessa Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MSKCC, New York, New York, USA
| | - Thomas Brinkman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MSKCC, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Wanquing Zhi
- Division of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, MSKCC, New York, New York, USA
| | - James Fetten
- Division of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, MSKCC, New York, New York, USA
| | - Alan Ho
- Division of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, MSKCC, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | - Michael Tuttle
- Endocrine Service, Department of Medicine, MSKCC, New York, New York, USA
| | - James Fagin
- Endocrine Service, Department of Medicine, MSKCC, New York, New York, USA
| | - David G. Pfister
- Division of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, MSKCC, New York, New York, USA
| | - Eric Sherman
- Division of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, MSKCC, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Hesse J, Zakeri K, Lee NY. In Reply to Qureshi et al. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100962. [PMID: 35865372 PMCID: PMC9294979 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.100962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Hesse
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Adilbay D, Yuan A, Romesser PB, Wong RJ, Shah JP, Shaha AR, Tuttle MR, Patel S, Lee NY, Ganly I. ASO Visual Abstract: Well Differentiated Thyroid Cancer-Who Should get Postoperative Radiation? Ann Surg Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11927-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
45
|
Yang JT, Wijetunga NA, Pentsova E, Wolden SL, Young RJ, Correa D, Zhang Z, Zheng J, Betof Warner A, Yu HA, Kris MG, Seidman AD, Malani R, Lin A, DeAngelis LM, Lee NY, Powell SN, Boire AA. Phase II randomized study comparing proton craniospinal irradiation with photon involved-field radiotherapy for patients with solid tumor leptomeningeal metastasis. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.2000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
2000 Background: Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is associated with limited survival and treatments. Photon involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) is the standard of care radiotherapy (RT) but benefits are limited. We hypothesized that proton craniospinal irradiation (pCSI) encompassing the central nervous system (CNS) compartment would result in superior CNS disease control compared to IFRT. Methods: We conducted a randomized phase 2 study comparing pCSI vs. IFRT in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or breast cancer LM. Eligibility criteria included radiographic and/or cytologic LM and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥ 60. Patients were stratified by histology (breast vs. NSCLC) and systemic disease (active vs. stable) and were randomized in a 2:1 ratio of pCSI:IFRT. Patients with all other solid tumor histologies were enrolled to an exploratory pCSI arm. RT was 3Gy x 10 fractions for all patients. The primary endpoint is CNS progression-free survival (CNS PFS), defined as time from randomization to CNS progression (POD); secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events (TAEs). A target of 81 patients to compare pCSI and IFRT was designed with a one-sided alpha of 0.025 and a power of 0.8 based on stratified log-rank test. Analysis is based on intent-to-treat. Results: From 4/2020-10/2021, 42 and 21 patients were randomized to pCSI and IFRT, respectively. Baseline factors were not different: median age was 56 vs. 61 years (p = 0.5); both cohorts included 57% NSCLC and 52% with active systemic disease. At median follow up of 7.1 months, 25 patients had CNS POD (pCSI = 9 [21%], IFRT = 16 [76%]) and 28 died (pCSI = 15 [36%], IFRT = 13 [62%]). At planned interim analysis, significant benefit in CNS PFS was observed with pCSI (median = 7.5 months, 95% CI: 6.6-NA) vs. IFRT (median = 2.0, 95% CI: 1.0-5.1, p < 0.001). As a result, the Data and Safety Monitoring Committee recommended early discontinuation of the trial. In addition, OS benefit with pCSI (median = 8.2 months, 95% CI: 7.4-NA) vs. IFRT (median = 4.9 months, 95% CI: 3.1-NA, p = 0.04) was observed. In a multivariable analysis including age, KPS and stratification factors, CNS PFS and OS benefit for pCSI remained significant. Grade 3 non-heme TAEs occurred in 3 patients with pCSI and 5 with IFRT. For the exploratory pCSI cohort, 35 patients enrolled, the median age was 61, 20 (57%) had active systemic disease and ovarian (7 [20%]) was the most common histology. At median follow up of 9.6 months, 7 (20%) had CNS POD and 20 (57%) died. Median CNS PFS was 5.4 months (95% CI: 4.8-9.1), OS was 6.6 months (95% CI: 5.4-12.1) and 4 patients had Grade 3 TAEs. Conclusions: In this trial, the first randomized study of RT for LM, we demonstrated improved CNS PFS of pCSI compared to IFRT, meeting the primary endpoint. pCSI also had a significant OS benefit. Grade 3 toxicities were comparable. Clinical trial information: NCT04343573.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Denise Correa
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Zhigang Zhang
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Junting Zheng
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Mark G. Kris
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Rachna Malani
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Andrew Lin
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Nancy Y. Lee
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Dunn L, Sherman EJ, Ho AL, Ganly I, Riaz N, Morris L, Hung KW(T, Kriplani A, Cracchiolo JR, Cohen M, Boyle J, Patel SG, Haque S, Katabi N, Ghossein RA, McBride SM, Michel LS, Wong RJ, Lee NY, Pfister DG. A pilot study of neoadjuvant cemiplimab with platinum-doublet chemotherapy and cetuximab in patients with resectable, locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.tps6109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS6109 Background: Definitive treatment of locally advanced HNSCC can require radical surgery and reconstruction often resulting in unacceptable functional consequences. Radiotherapy, often with concurrent chemotherapy, is administered postoperatively to achieve the best chance for cure. Induction chemotherapy has previously been shown to reduce the extent of surgical resection and need for adjuvant radiation (RT). The purpose of this trial is to evaluate if an induction regimen combining cytotoxic chemotherapy, EGFR targeting, and immune checkpoint blockade can pathologically downstage resectable HNSCC sufficiently to decrease surgical morbidity and justify omission of adjuvant RT-based therapy. Compared to standard docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-FU (TPF), docetaxel, cisplatin, and cetuximab (TPC) has been shown to be a therapeutic alternative with a more favorable toxicity profile. Targeting PD-1 alone can induce significant pathologic responses in resectable HNSCC patients. Combining PD-1 inhibitors with cetuximab has shown promising activity in incurable HNSCC; cetuximab may optimize the tumor immune microenvionment for PD-1 therapy by stimulating IFN-gamma secretion to increase dendritic cell maturation and CD8 T cell expression of PD1. Based on this rationale, we are evaluating the novel induction regimen of platinum, docetaxel, cetuximab plus cemiplimab (anti-PD1 antibody). Methods: This is a 10-patient pilot study for locally advanced, resectable HNSCC patients for whom standard management requires adjuvant RT +/- chemotherapy. Patients will receive neoadjuvant treatment with a loading dose of cetuximab and cemiplimab followed by 3 cycles of cisplatin or carboplatin, docetaxel, cetuximab and cemiplimab followed by definitive surgical resection of the primary site +/- neck dissection(s). Post-operative RT +/- radiosensitizing agent(s) will be administered per standard of care (SOC) based on pathologic staging (rather than clinical staging at presentation). If the pathologic stage following induction and surgery is ypT0-2N0 without adverse features, adjuvant RT will not be administered and 6 months of adjuvant cemiplimab will be given. Otherwise, patients will receive SOC adjuvant RT-based treatment. The primary endpoint is safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints include feasibility assessed by the number of patients whose definitive surgery was delayed due to toxicity and quantifying the number in whom clinical to pathologic downstaging is achieved and the planned surgery and/or need for adjuvant-RT based therapy is modified. Exploratory endpoints include evaluating the association between biomarkers in the tumor microenvironment and peripheral blood with pathologic response. 8 of 10 patients have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT04722523.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Dunn
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Alan Loh Ho
- Solid Tumor Oncology Division, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ian Ganly
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Nadeem Riaz
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Luc Morris
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | - Marc Cohen
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jay Boyle
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Sofia Haque
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Nora Katabi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | - Nancy Y. Lee
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Ledesma Vicioso N, Lin D, Gomez DR, Yang JT, Lee NY, Rimner A, Yamada Y, Zelefsky MJ, Kalman NS, Rutter CE, Kotecha RR, Mehta MP, Panoff JE, Chuong MD, Salner AL, Ostroff JS, Diamond LC, Mathis NJ, Cahlon O, Pfister DG, Zhang Z, Chino F, Tsai J, Gillespie EF. Implementation Strategies to Increase Clinical Trial Enrollment in a Community-Academic Partnership and Impact on Hispanic Representation: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:e780-e785. [PMID: 35544650 PMCID: PMC10166438 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Community-academic partnerships have the potential to improve access to clinical trials for under-represented minority patients who more often receive cancer treatment in community settings. In 2017, the Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) Cancer Center began opening investigator-initiated clinical trials in radiation oncology in targeted community-based partner sites with a high potential to improve diverse population accrual. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a set of implementation strategies for increasing overall community-based enrollment and the resulting proportional enrollment of Hispanic patients on trials on the basis of availability in community-based partner sites. METHODS An interrupted time series analysis evaluating implementation strategies was conducted from April 2018 to September 2021. Descriptive analysis ofHispanic enrollment on investigator-initiated randomized therapeutic radiation trials open at community-based sites was compared with those open only at themain academic center. RESULTS Overall, 84 patients were enrolled in clinical trials in the MSK Alliance, of which 48 (56%) identified as Hispanic. The quarterly patient enrollment pre- vs postimplementation increased from 1.39 (95% CI, -3.67 to 6.46) to 9.42 (95% CI, 2.05 to 16.78; P5 .017). In the investigator-initiated randomized therapeutic radiation trials open in the MSK Alliance, Hispanic representation was 11.5% and 35.9% in twometastatic trials and 14.2% in a proton versus photon trial. Inmatched trials open only at the main academic center, Hispanic representation was 5.6%, 6.0%, and 4.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION A combination of practice-level and physician-level strategies implemented at community-based partner sites was associated with increased clinical trial enrollment, which translated to improved Hispanic representation. This supports the role Q:2 of strategic community-academic partnerships in addressing disparities in clinical trial enrollment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Diana Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Daniel R Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jonathan T Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Yoshiya Yamada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Michael J Zelefsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Noah S Kalman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL
| | | | - Rupesh R Kotecha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL
| | - Minesh P Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL
| | - Joseph E Panoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL
| | - Michael D Chuong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL
| | | | - Jamie S Ostroff
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Lisa C Diamond
- Immigrant Health and Cancer Disparities Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Noah J Mathis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Oren Cahlon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - David G Pfister
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Zhigang Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Fumiko Chino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jillian Tsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Erin F Gillespie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Mahase SS, Singh B, Wong RJ, Ganly I, Boyle JO, Patel SG, Lee NY. Primary chondrosarcomas of the larynx treated with proton radiotherapy: A single institutional experience. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2022; 5:e1621. [PMID: 35537940 PMCID: PMC9458497 DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Revised: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Primary laryngeal chondrosarcomas are rare entities whose excellent survival rates following resection promote conservative surgical approaches to maintain quality of life without compromising outcomes. There are excellent outcomes in skull base chondrosarcomas treated with maximal safe resection and post‐operative proton therapy. Extrapolating from these findings, we report our institutional experience treating symptomatic or growing laryngeal chondrosarcomas using proton beam therapy. Cases Demographic information, clinical characteristics, treatment details, and follow‐up data were collected and summarized. Patients were monitored with serial imaging and examination. Stable disease was defined as no progression of disease on imaging. Two patients underwent subtotal resections followed by post‐operative radiotherapy, while two patients received definitive radiotherapy. All patients are currently alive with stable disease at their last follow‐up. Conclusion This case series provides initial evidence for excellent outcomes with maximal safe surgical resection followed by proton beam therapy for patients with symptomatic or growing laryngeal chondrosarcomas. Larger studies are warranted to determine the optimal therapeutic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean S Mahase
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Bhuvanesh Singh
- Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Richard J Wong
- Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ian Ganly
- Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jay O Boyle
- Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Snehal G Patel
- Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Raab G, Restifo D, McBride SM, Wong RJ, Lee NY, Shahrokni A, Zakeri K. Outcomes following head and neck cancer surgery among older adults as determined by an electronic geriatric assessment. J Geriatr Oncol 2022; 13:228-233. [PMID: 34756495 PMCID: PMC8882127 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Revised: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Older adults with head and neck cancer have increased postoperative complications, longer hospital stays, and higher rates of mortality. Geriatric assessment (GA) provides a measure of overall health status and is preferable to using age alone for assessing fitness for surgery. We sought to determine whether a patient's frailty as determined by a novel electronic GA is associated with outcomes after head and neck cancer (HNC) surgery. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of 159 patients aged 75 and older referred to the Geriatrics Service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center for pre-operative evaluation prior to undergoing HNC surgery. All patients completed the electronic Rapid Fitness Assessment (eRFA) within 60 days prior to surgery. The accumulated geriatric deficit (AGD) score includes twelve domains from the eRFA with a point assigned for each domain in which there is a deficit and a final point related to comorbidities. Three other metrics were individually assessed: age, Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), and number of comorbidities. We utilized multivariable linear regression and t-tests to determine whether frailty is associated with longer length of hospital stay, 30-day intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and 30-day and 90-day postoperative mortality. RESULTS Patients with a higher AGD score spent more time in the hospital post-operatively (1.0 day increase per unit increase in AGD; 95% CI: 0.21-1.9; p = 0.015). Lower KPS was also associated with statistically significant longer length of stay (-2.70 day change per increasing index KPS; 95% CI: -4.30 - -1.00; days; p = 0.002), while age and comorbidity were not found to be statistically associated with length of stay. Higher AGD score remained significantly associated with longer length of stay on multivariable analysis (0.93 day increase per unit increase in AGD; 95% CI 0.15-1.71; p = 0.019). AGD was the only metric associated with increased risk of ICU admission (6.6 vs 5.0 geriatric deficits for those admitted vs not admitted to ICU; p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS Frailty is associated with increased length of hospital stay and ICU admission in older adults with HNC undergoing surgery. GA can be used to counsel patients on the expected postoperative course.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Raab
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Sean M. McBride
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Richard J Wong
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Armin Shahrokni
- Geriatrics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Tsai CJ, McBride SM, Riaz N, Kang JJ, Spielsinger DJ, Waldenberg T, Gelblum D, Yu Y, Chen LC, Zakeri K, Wong RJ, Dunn L, Pfister DG, Sherman EJ, Lee NY. Evaluation of Substantial Reduction in Elective Radiotherapy Dose and Field in Patients With Human Papillomavirus-Associated Oropharyngeal Carcinoma Treated With Definitive Chemoradiotherapy. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:364-372. [PMID: 35050342 PMCID: PMC8778604 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.6416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Several de-escalation strategies for human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) have focused on deintensifying gross disease treatment. Reduction of radiotherapy dose and target volume to subclinical regions may achieve good clinical outcomes with favorable patient quality of life (QOL). OBJECTIVE To determine outcomes from a systematic approach of reducing radiotherapy dose and target volume to the elective treatment regions in patients with HPV-associated OPC undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective cohort study included 276 consecutive patients with HPV-positive OPC receiving CCRT from March 1, 2017, to July 31, 2019. Data were analyzed from February 23 to September 13, 2021. INTERVENTIONS Elective nodal and subclinical regions received 30 Gy of radiotherapy in 15 fractions, followed by a cone down of 40 Gy in 20 fractions to gross disease for a total dose of 70 Gy. The high retropharyngeal nodal basins in the node-negative neck and bilateral levels IB and V basins were omitted. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Patients were followed up to evaluate locoregional control as the primary outcome and distant metastasis-free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival as secondary outcomes. Quality-of-life data were obtained at each visit when feasible. RESULTS Among the 276 patients included in the analysis, the median age was 61 (range, 36-87) years; 247 (89.5%) were men; and 183 (66.3%) had less than 10 pack-years of smoking history. Most patients (251 [90.9%]) were White. Overall, 87 (31.5%) had cT3-cT4 disease and 65 (23.5%) had cN2-cN3 disease per the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual. One hundred seventy-two patients (62.3%) completed 300-mg/m2 high-dose cisplatin therapy. During a median follow-up of 26 (range, 21-32) months, 8 patients developed locoregional recurrence, including 7 at the primary site or gross nodes that received a total dose of 70 Gy and 1 with a persistent node not previously identified as gross disease that received a total dose of only 30 Gy. The 24-month locoregional control was 97.0%; progression-free survival, 88.0%; distant metastasis-free survival, 95.2%; and overall survival, 95.1%. During treatment, 17 patients (6.2%) required a feeding tube. At 24 months, most of the QOL composite scores (jaw-related problems, pain, social contact, eating, speech, and swallow) were comparable or superior to baseline measures except for senses, dry mouth, muscular tension, and cognitive functioning, which improved over time but remained marginally worse than baseline. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This cohort study found that the evaluated de-escalation strategy for elective regions showed favorable clinical outcomes and QOL profiles. Long-term follow-up data will help affirm the efficacy of this strategy as a care option for treating HPV-associated OPC with primary CCRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. Jillian Tsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sean M. McBride
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nadeem Riaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jung J. Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daniel J. Spielsinger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Todd Waldenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daphna Gelblum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yao Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Linda C. Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Richard J. Wong
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Lara Dunn
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David G. Pfister
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Eric J. Sherman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nancy Y. Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|