Glypican-3 distinguishes aggressive from non-aggressive odontogenic tumors: a preliminary study

Immunohistochemical expression of Ki-67 and Glypican-3 to distinguish aggressive from nonaggressive benign odontogenic tumors

Background

The benign neoplasms are normally slow growing, indolent with no invasive potential. However, there exist a few locally aggressive benign odontogenic tumors that have a tendency to invade and deform the surrounding structures. The exact reason for the aggressiveness of these benign neoplasms remained an enigma. Their biology and clinical expression can often be destructive and ominous. An appropriate treatment protocol needs to be followed to combat the high recurrence rate and aggressiveness of these entities. Aggressive and noniaggressive epithelial odontogenic tumors were analyzed immunohistochemically with Ki-67 and glypican 3 (GPC3).

Materials and Methods

Fifty-nine cases of tumors were divided into aggressive odontogenic tumors (20 solid ameloblastomas, four unicystic ameloblastoma, and 28 keratocystic odontogenic tumors) and nonaggressive odontogenic tumors (five adenomatoid odontogenic tumors and two calcifying cystic odontogenic itumors).

Results

Statistical analysis using Pearson correlation showed Ki-67 to be a better marker for differentiating aggressive from nonaggressive odontogenic tumor as compared to GPC3 (P < 0.001, highly significant), whereas among aggressive tumors, GPC3 turned out to be more useful as compared to Ki-67 (P < 0.001, highly significant).

Conclusion

The present study provides an insight into the different biological behavior of odontogenic tumors, which can thus be helpful in determining the therapy strategies for more aggressive odontogenic tumors.

The immunohistochemical profile of basal cell nevus syndrome-associated and sporadic odontogenic keratocysts: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To provide a systematic review of the literature on studies comparing the immunoprofile of nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome (BCNS)-associated and sporadic odontogenic keratocysts (OKCs), in order to identify markers that could accurately distinguish the two OKC subtypes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched MEDLINE/Pubmed, Web of Science, EMBASE via OVID, and grey literature for publications until December 28th, 2019, that compared the immunohistochemical expression of the two OKC subtypes. The studies were qualitatively assessed using the Critical Appraisal Tool for Case Series (Joana Briggs Institute). Sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio and area under the curve, and pooled estimates were calculated, using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Seventy-one studies were qualitatively analyzed; 61 markers were evaluated in one study and 32 in ≥ 2 studies. Twenty-five studies reported differential expression of 29 markers in the form of higher number of positive cells or greater staining intensity usually in BCNS-associated OKCs. Meta-analysis for bcl-2, Cyclin D1, CD56, CK18, p53, and PCNA showed that none of those markers is distinguishable between BCNS-associated and sporadic OKCs, in a 95% confidence interval. The risk of bias was high in 34 studies, moderate in 22, and low in 15.

CONCLUSIONS

The present systematic review and meta-analysis uncovered that, although several immunohistochemical markers might characterize the OKC phenotype, they cannot discriminate between the BCNS-associated and sporadic OKCs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study highlighted the requirement for additional screening for markers by immunohistochemistry, preferentially coupled to alternative diagnostic applications such as genomics technologies.

Immunoexpression of DNA base excision repair and nucleotide excision repair proteins in ameloblastomas, syndromic and non-syndromic odontogenic keratocysts and dentigerous cysts

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the immunoexpression of DNA base excision repair (BER) [apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE-1), X-ray repair cross complementing 1 (XRCC-1)] and nucleotide excision repair (NER) [xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group (XPF)] proteins in benign epithelial odontogenic lesions with different biological behaviors.

DESIGN

Thirty solid ameloblastomas, 30 non-syndromic odontogenic keratocysts (NSOKCs), 29 syndromic odontogenic keratocysts (SKOCs), 30 dentigerous cysts (DCs) and 20 dental follicles (DFs) were evaluated quantitatively for APE-1, XRCC-1 and XPF through immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Nuclear expression of APE-1 was significantly higher in NSOKCs, SOKCs, and ameloblastomas in comparison to DCs (p < 0.001). Nuclear expression of XRCC-1 was higher in NSOKCs and SOKCs than in DCs (p < 0.05). At the nuclear level, XPF expression was higher in NSOKCs and SOKCs than in DCs and ameloblastomas (p < 0.05). A statistically significant higher expression of APE-1 (nuclear), XRCC-1 (nuclear), and XPF (nuclear and cytoplasmic) was found in all odontogenic lesion samples as compared to DFs (p < 0.05). For all lesions, there was a positive correlation between nuclear expression of APE-1 and XRCC-1 or XPF (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest a potential involvement of APE-1, XRCC-1 and XPF proteins in the pathogenesis of benign epithelial odontogenic lesions, especially in those with more aggressive biological behavior, such as ameloblastomas, NSOKCs, and SOKCs. We also showed that the expression of APE-1 was positively correlated with the nuclear expression of XRCC-1 and XPF, which may suggest an interaction between the BER and NER pathways in all odontogenic lesions studied herein.

Proteoglycans as potential biomarkers in odontogenic tumors

Proteoglycans (PGs) are essential for normal cellular development; however, alterations of their concentrations can promote tumor growth. To date, a limited number of studies report the presence of PGs in odontogenic tumors (OTs); therefore, the main purpose of this work is to gather the information published on the study of PGs. The search reported 26 articles referring to the presence of different PGs in distinct OTs from 1999 to May 2017. PGs seem to play an important role during OTs' development as they are involved in several tumor processes; however, the number of reports on the study of these molecules is low. Thus, more studies are necessary in order to gain a better understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of OTs.