Risk of high-grade malignancy in parotid gland tumors as classified by the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology

Performance Characteristics of Incisional and Core Needle Biopsies for Diagnosis in Parotid Gland: Single-Institutional Experience and Assessment of the Value of a Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology-Like Risk Stratification Model

CONTEXT.—

Unlike parotid fine-needle aspiration biopsy, standardized reporting for core needle biopsy (CNB) and incisional biopsy (IB) is not established.

OBJECTIVE.—

To examine the value of risk stratification by a Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC)-like classifier for parotid CNB/IB.

DESIGN.—

Five hundred ninety-two parotid biopsy records (CNB = 356, IB = 236) were retrieved (1994-2022) along with clinicopathologic data. Diagnoses were transformed to an MSRSGC-like classifier and compared with end points including risk of malignancy.

RESULTS.—

Over time, CNB was progressively more used compared with IB. Overall malignancy call rate was 223 of 592 (37.7%). Common specific diagnoses included Warthin tumor, lymphoma subtypes, and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma for CNB and IB, in addition to pleomorphic adenoma for CNB. Descriptive diagnoses were still frequent. Nondiagnostic rates were higher in CNB (26 of 356; 7.30%) than IB (5 of 236; 2.12%; P < .001). Tissue volumes significantly influenced CNB adequacy, with minimum and optimal volumes of 4.76 mm³ (J index, receiver operating characteristic curve) and 12.92 mm³ (95th percentile of distribution), respectively. One hundred forty-four patients (112 CNBs) had follow-up resections; diagnoses were concordant for 66 of 73 adequate CNBs (90.41%). Our restructured risk grouping of MSRSGC categories performed robustly in terms of risk of malignancy (sensitivity = 85.5%, specificity = 100%, accuracy = 92.3%, area under the curve = 0.9677).

CONCLUSIONS.—

Although CNB and IB are amenable to a risk stratification system, there are some differences as compared with fine-needle aspiration biopsy, particularly given the high baseline prevalence of malignancy. Specific diagnoses are often feasible and concordant with resection. CNB tissue volume can inform optimal and minimal sampling recommendations for adequacy.

Application of the Milan System of reporting salivary gland cytopathology and assessing its use as a risk stratification tool

INTRODUCTION

The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) was proposed by American Society of Cytopathology and International Academy of Cytology to standardize reporting system ensuring uniformity and better communication between clinicians and cytopathologists.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

1. To categorize salivary lesions as per MSRSGC. 2. To establish diagnostic accuracy of MSRSGC and calculate risk of malignancy for each diagnostic category.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An ambispective study was conducted over 5 years including 45 FNAC cases of salivary lesions. The cases were categorized according to Milan System, and diagnostic accuracy of MSRSGC was established. Risk of malignancy for each category was calculated.

RESULTS

The patients' age ranged from 13 to 77 years with maximum swellings in parotid (53.3%) followed by submandibular (15.6%) and submental (2.2%). Histopathological follow-up was done in all cases. The number of cases in each category was as follows: category I: 03 (6.7%), category II: 06 (13.3%), category III: 4 (8.9%), category IVA: 25 (55.6%), category IVB: 04 (8.9%), category V: 02 (4.4%), and category VI: 01 (2.2%). The calculated ROM was as follows: category I: 0%, category II: 0%, category III: 0% category IVA: 8.0%, category IVB: 25%, category V: 50%, and category VI: 100%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy with (without) indeterminate categories for malignancy were 88.9%(96.9), 66.7%(50.0), 94.1%(94.1), 50.0%(66.7), and 85.7%(91.9), respectively.

CONCLUSION

MSRSGC is an effective and standardized reporting system for categorization and risk stratification of salivary swellings which helps in enhancing patient care.

The Second Edition of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology: System Application, Outcome, and Cytohistological Correlation

Background

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology for salivary gland lesions is sensitive and specific for diagnosing and treating salivary gland pathologies. The objective of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) is to organize the diagnostic information from the FNA into a uniform reporting terminology.

Aims

The study was conducted retrospectively to reclassify previous diagnoses into the MSRSGC categories to determine the cytohistological concordance and assess the risk stratification by calculating the risk of malignancy (ROM) for different categories.

Materials and Methods

A total of 248 FNA cases of salivary gland lesions were analyzed and reclassified according to the second edition of the MSRSGC. The histological diagnosis was considered the gold standard. The ROM for each category was calculated based on 101 histopathologic follow-up cases.

Results

Of the 248 patients, 1.2% were classified as nondiagnostic, 37.9% as nonneoplastic, 1.2% as atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), 52.8% as benign neoplasm, 0.4% as uncertain malignant potential (SUMP), 0.4% as suspicious of malignancy (SFM), and 6.1% as malignant neoplasm. Histopathological correlation was available in 101 cases. The ROM was 0% for nonneoplastic lesions and benign neoplasms, and 100% for AUS, SUMP, SFM, and malignant categories. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FNA cytology in diagnosing salivary gland lesions using MSRSGC were found to be 76.5%, 100%, 100%, and 95.3%, respectively.

Conclusion

The use of the MSRSGC helps in triaging patients with salivary gland lesions, increases the effectiveness of communication between clinicians and pathologists, and thus facilitates individualized patient management.

Prioritizing parotid gland surgery: A call for the implementation of the MSRSGC classification

BACKGROUND

The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) is developed to aid diagnosis and management of salivary gland tumors. This study evaluates the time-to-treatment initiation (TTI) for parotid gland tumors in the Netherlands and relates these to the MSRSGC classification. Subsequently, the use of the MSRSGC in the Netherlands is evaluated.

METHODS

Data regarding fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and histopathological resections of the parotid were gathered from the Dutch nationwide pathology data bank (PALGA). The TTI was calculated for each MSRSGC category and type of treating center. FNACs performed from 2018 to 2021 were gathered from PALGA to estimate how frequently the MSRSGC classification was applied.

RESULTS

Median TTI in days were 86 for nondiagnostic (MSRSGC I), 75 for nonneoplastic (MSRSGC II), 65 for atypia of unknown significance (AUS) (MSRSGC III), 89 for benign (MSRSGC IVa), 52 for salivary gland neoplasm of unknown malignant potential (SUMP) (MSRSGC IVb), 31 for suspected malignant (MSRSGC V), and 30 for malignant (MSRSGC VI) categories. Significant variation in the TTI between the types of treating centers was found for the nondiagnostic, nonneoplastic, AUS, SUMP, and suspected malignant categories. In the first 3 years after the introduction of the MSRSGC, the pathologist stated the MSRSGC classification in 6.4% of all reports.

CONCLUSIONS

The median TTI for most categories is long, and there is significant interhospital variation in TTI. Preoperative risk stratification and treatment prioritization in parotid gland surgery in the Netherlands should be improved. The MSRSGC could contribute to this. Until 2021, the MSRSGS classification was implemented on a limited scale in the Netherlands.

Comparison Study of FNAC Using the Milan System Cytopathology versus Definitive Histology for the Diagnosis of Salivary Gland Tumors

INTRODUCTION

Salivary gland tumors (SGT) represent 6 to 8 percent of head and neck tumors. The cytologic diagnosis of SGT is performed by fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) with variable sensitivity and specificity. The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) categorizes the cytological results and provides the risk of malignancy (ROM). The aim of our study was to evaluate the cytological findings with the definitive pathological findings to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of FNAC in SGT according to MSRSGC classification.

METHOD

An observational, retrospective, single-center study was carried out at a tertiary referral hospital over a period of 10 years. Patients that underwent FNAC for major SGT and that have undergone surgery to remove the tumor were included. A histopathological follow-up was performed on the surgically excised lesions. Results from the FNAC were categorized into one of the six MSRSGC categories. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and diagnostic accuracy of FNAC for determining benign and malignant cases were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 417 cases were analyzed. The cytological prediction of ROM was 10% in nondiagnostic, 12.12% in non-neoplastic, 3.58% in neoplasm benign group, 60% in AUS and SUMP groups, and 100% in suspicious and malignant group. The statistical analysis of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy for determining benign cases was 99%, 55%, 94%, 93%, and 94%, respectively, and for determining malignant neoplasm was 54%, 99%, 93%, 94%, and 94%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In our hands, MSRSGC is highly sensitive for benign tumors and highly specific for malignant tumors. The low sensitivity to differentiate malignant from benign cases makes it necessary to apply an adequate anamnesis, physical examination, and imaging tests to consider surgical treatment in most cases.

Application of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) is a standard, evidence-based classification system for salivary gland fine-needle aspiration (SG-FNA). Since it was published in 2018, many researchers across the world have applied this uniform reporting system to their cohorts.

METHODS

The authors comprehensively reviewed cohort studies conducted since publication of the MSRSGC and performed a meta-analysis. The risk of neoplasm and the risk of malignancy (ROM) were calculated for each diagnostic category, and their diagnostic efficacy was evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirty-five studies were included in the meta-analysis. The total number of SG-FNAs was 10,706, and 7168 of those had histopathologic follow-up. The ROM for each category was: nondiagnostic, 11.4%; nonneoplastic, 10.9%; atypia of undetermined significance, 30.5%; neoplasm-benign, 2.8%; neoplasm-salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential, 37.7%; suspicious for malignancy, 83.8%; and malignant, 97.7%. Low-level heterogeneity was observed in ROM estimation. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio for differentiating malignant and benign lesions were 88.0%, 98.5% and 520.3, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The reporting of SG-FNA using the MSRSGC demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy. The ROM for each category was generally concordant with the recommendations, except for the suspicious for malignancy category, which was significantly higher than the reference value. The tiered, standardized classification system would benefit the clinical management of salivary gland lesions.

The use of diagnostic patterns for interventional cytopathology during rapid on-site evaluation and final classification

Pathologist-performed fine-needle aspiration, or interventional cytopathology, is a minimally invasive, highly accurate technique for sampling and diagnosing palpable lesions. Utilizing cytomorphologic patterns during rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE) and final classification is one of many strategies that an interventional cytopathologist can employ to simplify the diagnostic approach. Herein, we provide an overview of the salient cytomorphologic patterns encountered in common specimens obtained by the interventional cytopathologist, including major salivary glands, the thyroid gland, and superficial lymph nodes. The topics covered should provide a primer for those interested in utilizing a site-specific, pattern-based approach to cytopathologic evaluation. In summary, cytomorphologic patterns can be used during ROSE to establish adequacy, build a differential diagnosis, and to appropriately triage the specimen for additional investigation, such as microbiology cultures, a liquid-based preparation, a cell block preparation, flow cytometry, chemical analysis, or molecular diagnostic tests. Finally, this approach can be applied at the time of diagnosis to suggest additional ancillary studies, such as immunohistochemistry, and to inform accurate and definitive classification.

Nondiagnostic salivary gland FNAs are associated with decreased risk of malignancy compared with "all-comer" patients: Analysis of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology with a focus on Milan I: Nondiagnostic

BACKGROUND

The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) reports a 25% rate of malignancy (ROM) for the Milan I: Nondiagnostic (ND) category. We clarify the ROM of ND salivary gland fine-needle aspirations (SGFNAs) based on our institutional experience and review of the literature.

METHODS

Overall risk of malignancy (OROM) and that for those with surgical/flow cytometric follow-up (FROM) for each category and "all-comers" were calculated for Emory SGFNAs from January 2010 through March 2021. From a literature review of 50 articles using MSRSGC, distribution of diagnoses, rates of follow-up, FROM, and OROM by category were calculated. FROMs and OROMs between ND FNAs and all-comers were compared. Milan I rate was compared with the ratio of Milan I OROM to all-comer OROM.

RESULTS

Of 819 SGFNAs at Emory, 12.8% (n = 105/819) were ND. Thirty-two had known follow-up, with 12 (37.5%) being malignant. Nonmucinous cyst contents accounted for 26.7% of ND SGFNAs (n = 28/105); all 7 with surgical follow-up were benign. Of 50 MSRSGC studies, 18.2% (n = 2384/13,129) of SGFNAs were classified as ND, 26.6% (n = 635/2384) with known follow-up. Total FROM and OROM for ND FNAs (15.7% and 4.1%, respectively) were significantly lower than those for all-comers (24.9% and 11.4%, respectively) (p < .001). There was no relationship between rate of ND SGFNA and ND ROM.

CONCLUSIONS

The ND category is associated with a lower ROM than that of all-comer SGFNA patients. The "true" ROM for ND SGFNAs is likely best estimated by the 4.1% OROM. SGFNAs showing nonmucinous cyst contents have a particularly low ROM. Rate of ND SGFNAs does not influence ND ROM.

Utility of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytology, with focus on the incidence and histologic correlates of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) and salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (SUMP): A 3-year institutional experience

BACKGROUND

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is the preferred diagnostic test for salivary gland lesions. The purpose of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) is to standardize salivary gland cytology reporting and guide treatment decisions. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the utility and performance of the MSRSGC, with a focus on the cytomorphology of lesions diagnosed as atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) and salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (SUMP).

METHODS

In total, 123 salivary gland FNAs were included in the study. FNA diagnoses for all cases were reviewed and recategorized, as applicable, according to the MSRSGC. Cytohistologic correlation was performed in 51 cases that had available surgical follow-up, and the risk of malignancy (ROM) was calculated.

RESULTS

Most FNA samples were from the parotid gland. The mean patient age was 61.4 years, and the male-to-female ratio was 1.3:1. The ROM was 0% (categories I and II; nondiagnostic and benign nonneoplastic, respectively), 50% (category III; AUS), 0% (category IVA; benign neoplasm), 40% (category IVB; SUMP), 100% (category V; suspicious for malignancy), and 100% (category VI; malignant). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 100% each. In addition, the primary factors for an AUS diagnosis were identified as low cellularity and/or the presence of lymphocytes. The presence of oncocytes followed by cellular atypia in an otherwise classic pleomorphic adenoma were principal factors for a SUMP diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors report an ROM comparable to that reported in the literature, with a sensitivity and specificity of 100%, supporting adaptation of the MSRSGC into the system for reporting salivary gland cytology. In addition, the findings emphasize the need to refine criteria for AUS and SUMP, thereby improving the predictive capability and subsequent management of salivary gland lesions.

A multi-institutional study of salivary gland cytopathology: Application of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology in Japan

Background

The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) is a risk‐stratification reporting system that was introduced in 2018. The objective of this multi‐institutional study was to evaluate the utility of the MSRSGC in Japan.

Methods

In total, 1608 fine‐needle aspiration samples with matching histologic diagnoses were retrieved from 12 large institutions in Japan. The diagnostic categories of the MSRSGC were assigned prospectively or retrospectively, and the results were compared with the histologic diagnoses.

Results

The cases were classified as follows: nondiagnostic, 18.1%; non‐neoplastic, 4.1%; atypia of undetermined significance, 11.5%; neoplasm‐benign, 43.7%; salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential, 9.6%; suspicious for malignancy, 3.6%; and malignant, 9.4%. The risk of neoplasm and the risk of malignancy in each MSRSGC category were as follows: nondiagnostic, 72.9% and 13.4%, respectively; non‐neoplastic, 15.2% and 9.1%, respectively; atypia of undetermined significance, 77.9% and 24.9%, respectively; neoplasm‐benign, 99% and 1.8%, respectively; salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential, 94.8% and 37%, respectively; suspicious for malignancy, 100% and 89.7%, respectively; and malignant, 100% and 99.3%, respectively. The accuracy of the MSRSGC for diagnosing neoplasms was 97.8%, and its accuracy for diagnosing malignancy was 97.3%. Institutions that used Romanowsky‐stained preparations had lower nondiagnostic rates and lower risks of neoplasm and malignancy in the non‐neoplastic category.

Conclusions

The MSRSGC is useful for risk stratification and quality control. Widespread use of the MSRSGC would improve the accuracy of salivary gland cytology and lead to better patient care in Japan.

This is the first multi‐institutional study of a large‐scale application of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology in Japan. It demonstrates the usefulness of the Milan system in the diagnosis of salivary gland lesions and for the quality control of salivary gland cytology results.

Management of Salivary Gland Malignancy: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations for practicing physicians and other healthcare providers on the management of salivary gland malignancy.

METHODS

ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, surgical oncology, radiation oncology, neuroradiology, pathology, and patient advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 2000 through 2020. Outcomes of interest included survival, diagnostic accuracy, disease recurrence, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 293 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. Six main clinical questions were addressed, which included subquestions on preoperative evaluations, surgical diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, appropriate radiotherapy techniques, the role of systemic therapy, and follow-up evaluations.

RECOMMENDATIONS

When possible, evidence-based recommendations were developed to address the diagnosis and appropriate preoperative evaluations for patients with a salivary gland malignancy, therapeutic procedures, and appropriate treatment options in various salivary gland histologies.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines.

Accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of salivary gland masses according to the Milan reporting system and to an in-house system

BACKGROUND

This study aims to assess in our institutional experience the accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in the diagnosis of salivary gland masses (SGM) according to the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) and to an in-house system.

METHODS

The study included 189 FNACs conducted between January 2011 and December 2019. The FNACs, classified according to the in-house system, were reclassified according the MSRSGC. Taking histopathology as gold standard, the measures of diagnostic accuracy of FNAC were determined for suspicion for malignancy (SFM) and malignant categories.

RESULTS

According to the in house system, FNAC diagnoses were classified as: 23 (12.2%) non-diagnostic (ND), 23 (12.2%) non-neoplastic (NN), 119 (62.9%) benign neoplasm (BN), 10 (5.2%) indefinite neoplasm (IN), 2 (1.1%) SFM, and 12 (6.4%) malignant (M). Based on the MSRSGC, there were 3 (1.5%) cases of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) and 7 (3.7%) neoplasms of uncertain malignant potential (SUMP). The number of ND, NN, BN, SFM, and M cases were identical in the two systems. For both systems, the sensitivity, the specificity, the positive predictive value, the negative predictive value, and the accuracy for malignancy diagnosis were 77.8%, 100%, 100%, 97.6%, and 97.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

According to the MSRGC and to our in-house reporting system, FNAC is an accurate technique for the diagnosis of malignant salivary tumors with excellent specificity and good sensitivity. However, MSRGC has the advantage of standardization of salivary gland cytology reporting.

Application of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology: A 10-Year Experience in a Single Japanese Institution

OBJECTIVE

The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) is a recently published evidence-based categorization system for salivary gland fine-needle aspiration (FNA). We applied MSRSGC to Japanese cases and evaluated its utility.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 480 FNA cases were reviewed. We recategorized each case into one of the MSRSGC categories. The risk of neoplasm (RON) and the risk of malignancy (ROM) for each diagnostic category in MSRSGC, and the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for malignancy and for neoplasms were calculated for cases with histological follow-up. In addition, the overall ROM (O-ROM) was calculated for all FNA cases.

RESULTS

RON, ROM, and O-ROM rates were as follows - non-diagnostic: 51.3, 5.1, and 1.0%; non-neoplastic: 0, 0, and 0%; atypia of undetermined significance: 83.9, 12.9, and 7.3%; neoplasm, benign: 100, 0, and 0%; salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential: 100, 32.1, and 23.7%; suspicious for malignancy: 100, 85.7, and 60%; and malignant: 100, 100, 81.8%. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy with (without) indeterminate cases for malignancy were 65 (100), 99 (99), 92% (99%) and PPV and NPV were 96 and 100%, respectively, and those for neoplasms were 84 (100), 100 (100), 85% (100%), and PPV and NPV were 100 and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The MSRSGC is useful for stratification of ROM and for promoting the performance of salivary gland FNA. The MSRSGC could be easily introduced in Japan and may improve the Japanese salivary gland FNA status.

The Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology: A comprehensive review of the literature

BACKGROUND

The Milan system for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) was published in 2018. Since then, many authors have published their institutional experience by retrospectively assigning salivary gland fine-needle aspiration cases to each of the MSRSGC categories and calculated their risk of malignancy (ROM) accordingly.

METHODS

We reviewed all published articles available online in English that used the MSRSGC since or near its publication. We calculated the risk of neoplasm and ROM for each diagnostic category. In addition, the false-negative and false-positive rates from all studies were examined.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven articles were identified in the English literature; 2 were published in 2017, 14 in 2018, 18 in 2019, and 3 in 2020. The total number of cases was 16 394, and 8 468 had surgical follow-up. The mean ROM was 16.9% for category I, 10.5% for category II, 39.3% for category III, 2.9% for category IVa, 39.4% for category IVb, 84.2% for category V, and 97.5% for category VI. The mean false-negative rate for MSRSGC categories II and IVa was 4.5%. Similarly, the mean false-positive rate for MSRSGC categories V and VI was 5.1%.

CONCLUSION

A tiered classification scheme of MSRSGC is helpful in effectively guiding clinical management of patients with salivary gland lesions. The reported mean ROM for each category in most studies is within the recommended range published by the MSRSGC.

A retrospective cytohistological correlation of fine-needle aspiration cytology with classification by the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology

Background

Before publication of the new classification system named the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) in 2018, there was no standard classification for salivary gland lesions obtained by fine-needle aspiration (FNA). We therefore aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of this system by retrospectively reviewing FNA samples using the MSRSGC and to determine their risk of developing into neoplasms and becoming malignant.

Methods

Retrospective slide review and classification of salivary gland FNAs obtained over a 6-year period (2013–2018) at a single center were performed by two pathologists. The risks of neoplasm and malignancy for each category also were calculated.

Results

This study surveyed 374 FNAs (371 patients) performed over a six-year period and selected 148 cases that included documented surgical follow-up (39.6%). Among the surgically treated cases, the distributions of FNA categories were as follows: non-diagnostic (ND; 16.9%), non-neoplastic (NN; 2.7%), atypia of undetermined significance (AUS; 3.4%), benign (BN; 54.7%), salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (SUMP; 10.1%), suspicious for malignancy (SM; 6.8%), and malignant (M; 5.4%). The risk of malignancy (ROM) was 24.0% for ND, 0% for NN, 40.0% for AUS, 2.5% for BN, 46.7% for SUMP, 100% for SM, and 87.5% for M. The overall diagnostic accuracy was 95.9% (142/148 cases).

Conclusions

The newly proposed MSRSGC appears to be a reliable system for classification of salivary gland lesions according to the associated ROM.

Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology- An Experience from Western Indian Population

Introduction:

Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) can be challenging to provide a precise diagnosis in salivary gland cytopathology due to diversity of lesions and cytomorphological convergence between the tumors and within the same tumor of salivary gland. The recently proposed Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) provides a risk stratification-based classification system with an intrinsic risk of malignancy (ROM) for each diagnostic category, which aims to furnish useful information to the clinicians. This study was undertaken to evaluate the diagnostic utility and validity of MSRSGC.

Methods and Material:

In this retrospective study, FNAC done for all salivary gland lesions over a period of two years were retrieved. All cases were categorized according to MSRSGC and correlated with histopathological follow-up, wherever available. ROM was calculated for each category.

Results:

The cases belong to following categories: non-diagnostic (1.27%), non-neoplastic (30.38%), atypia of undetermined significance (5.06%), benign neoplasm (46.84%), salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (1.27%), suspicious for malignancy (1.27%), and malignant (13.92%). Out of 79 cases, 50.63% had follow-up. The ROM were 0% for category II and IVa, 50% for category III, and 100% for category IVb, V, and VI. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were recorded as 77.78%, 100%, 100%, 91.3%, and 93.33%, respectively.

Conclusions:

Application of MSRSGC has immense value for standardization of reporting of salivary gland FNAC. Our data corresponds to the studies done worldwide and recommends the use of MSRSGC for future diagnostic purposes.

A 4-Year Retrospective Analysis of Salivary Gland Cytopathology Using the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytology and Ancillary Studies

The cytopathology of salivary glands presents major challenges due to the heterogeneity of benign and malignant neoplasms, which is reflected in the large range of WHO 2017 Classifications. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) of salivary gland tumours is still the favoured initial approach as it results in good sensitivity and specificity. The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) was published in 2018 and comprises seven categories. We report results from a 4-year retrospective analysis of 328 salivary gland FNAs which were reviewed and classified according to the MSRSGC. We assess the risk of neoplasm, the risk of malignancy and the contribution of ancillary studies to the diagnosis. Benign neoplasms were the most frequent diagnosis (44.2%). Malignant and suspicious for malignancy were identified in 11.3% and 4.9% of diagnosed cases, respectively. Histopathological analysis after surgery was available for 216 (65.8%) of the cases. All malignant cases were confirmed post-surgery, and 68.8% of suspicious for malignancy were confirmed as malignant tumours. Immunocytochemistry was informative in 72.3% of cases. Immunocytochemistry and FISH provided the definitive diagnosis in 23.7% and 33% of cases, respectively. In conclusion, the MSRSGC is more effective when specific features of neoplasms can be identified. Ancillary studies help to further characterise salivary gland tumours and thereby increase the accuracy of MSRSGC.

Salivary Gland FNA Diagnostics in a Real-Life Setting: One-Year-Experiences of the Implementation of the Milan System in a Tertiary Care Center

The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) was introduced in 2018 following other organ specific cytopathological reporting systems and it aimed at bringing a practical, evidence-based, user-friendly classification system with characterization and management algorithms. At the Department of Pathology, Fimlab Laboratories, Tampere, Finland all salivary fine needle aspirations (FNAs) have been given cytopathological diagnoses according to the MSRSGC since January 2018. Analyses of a one-year-period (January 2018–December 2018) consisted of 183 salivary FNA samples from 138 patients with correlation to histopathology in 90 cases with surgical follow-up. The MSRSGC performance in patient based analysis was as follows: accuracy was 90.9%, sensitivity was 61.5%, specificity was 100%, positive predictive value was 100%, and negative predictive value was 89.4%, respectively. Risks of malignancy (ROMs) in MSRSGC categories were: 0.0% (0/15) in non-diagnostic category, 100.0% (1/1) in non-neoplastic category biased by only one falsely-negative lymphoma case, 14.3% (1/7) in atypia of undetermined significance category, 0.0% (0/28) in benign neoplasm category, 27.3% (3/11) in neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential category, and 100% for both suspicious for malignancy (4/4) and malignancy (4/4) categories, respectively. The MSRSGC has been proven as a reliable classification system in salivary gland FNA routine diagnostics in a tertiary care center.

Implementation of the MILAN system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology: Interobserver concordance and cytohistological correlation of discordant cases

BACKGROUND

Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) plays a pivotal role in evaluating salivary gland (SG) tumors. Several studies have shown diagnostic utility of MILAN system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology (MSRSGC) by examining risk of malignancy but only an occasional study has focused on interobserver variability. Hence, the present study was undertaken to assess the agreement among cytopathologists with varying experience in SG cytopathology using MSRSGC and to re-evaluate discordant cytohistological diagnoses for possible causes of misinterpretation.

METHODS

All SG lesions subjected to FNAC over a period of 3½ years were studied. The cases were critically reviewed by 2 pathologists with variable experience in cytopathology using MSRSGC and concordance level among them was calculated. Cytohistological discordant diagnoses were reclassified and possible causes of misinterpretation during routine reporting were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 150 SG aspirates categorized according to MSRSGC, diagnostic disagreement between 2 pathologists was found in 10. Unweighted Cohen's Kappa score between consultant and resident was 0.812 (high). Among 55 cases with histological correlation, cytohistological discordance was seen in 12. True pitfalls constituted 50% of discordant cases while rest 50% were attributed to practical issues (turnaround time and heavy case load) during routine reporting.

CONCLUSION

MSRSGC can be used with good reproducibility between observers with variable cytopathology experience. Heterogeneous nature of SG neoplasm is a known pitfall in FNA diagnosis of SG neoplasms. During routine reporting turnaround time, heavy case load and reporting by cytopathologists with variable experience add on to challenges faced in reporting cytopathology of SG neoplasm.