Influence of the layer thickness on the flexural strength of aged and non-aged additively manufactured interim dental material

Impact of 3D resin and base designs on the accuracy of additively manufactured casts using a stereolithography technology

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Three-dimensional (3D) printed casts can be fabricated using a wide range of 3D polymer resins and designed with varying casts´ base configurations. Nevertheless, the influence of different base designs, in conjunction with various 3D printing resins, on the final dimensional accuracy of casts manufactured through SLA-LCD 3D printing technology remains unclear.

PURPOSE

This study assessed the impact of 3D printing resins and base designs on the dimensional accuracy of diagnostic casts fabricated using a SLA-LCD vat-polymerization 3D printer. Two resins (NextDent Model 2.0 and Aqua Gray 4K) and 5 different base configurations were evaluated for their effect on trueness and precision.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A digital maxillary cast was modified into three base designs: solid (Group S), honeycomb (Group HC), and hollow (Group H). Honeycomb and hollow designs had subgroups with 1-mm (HC1, H1) and 2-mm (HC2, H2) wall thicknesses, resulting in 50 specimens (n=10 per subgroup). Eleven embedded precision cubes were used for accuracy assessment. A Sonic Mini 4K vat-polymerization printer was used for cast printing, and dimensional deviations were captured using a coordinate measuring device. Trueness was defined by the average dimensional discrepancy, and precision was indicated by the standard deviation. Statistical analysis included Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (α=.05).

RESULTS

NextDent resin showed trueness falling between 44.8 5 µm and 64.5 µm and precision values varying between 33.5 5 µm and 48.9 µm, while Aqua Gray 4K resin ranged from 24.1 5 µm to 81.1 µm for trueness and 19.8 5 µm to 65.9 µm for precision. Significant differences (P<.001) were observed in all axes (x-, y-, z-axes) and 3D deviations, influenced by resin and base design.

CONCLUSIONS

Resin type and base design significantly affect the dimensional accuracy of 3D printed casts. Aqua Gray 4K with a 2-mm hollow base provided the highest accuracy, particularly when matched with the printer manufacturer. All casts met clinical standards.

Flexural Strength and Surface Properties of 3D-Printed Denture Base Resins-Effect of Build Angle, Layer Thickness and Aging

A variety of printable resins for denture bases are available, without detailed instructions on print parameters. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the printing build angle and the layer thickness of 3D-printed denture base resins before and after thermocyclic aging on flexural strength values and surface properties. The flexural strength, surface roughness (Ra, Rz) and hardness (HM, HV2) of two 3D-printed denture base resins (Formlabs (FL) and V-print dentbase, VOCO, (VC)) were therefore compared to a conventionally pressed cold-curing control material (PalaXpress (PP)). The specimens were printed at a 0°, 45° or 90° build angle and the layer thickness was varied for FL at 50 and 100 µm and evaluated before and after thermocyclic aging (N = 200; n = 10). Differences in flexural strength values were analyzed using multifactorial ANOVAs (α = 0.05). The build angle and aging significantly affected the flexural strength of the 3D-printed denture base resins (p < 0.05), while the layer thickness showed no effect for FL (p = 0.461). The required threshold value of 65 MPa defined by ISO 20795-1 was exceeded by PP (70.5 MPa ± 5.5 MPa), by FL when printed at 90° (69.3 MPa ± 7.7 MPa) and by VC at 0° (69.0 MPa ± 4.6 MPa). The choice of an appropriate build angle for each material and printing technology is crucial for the flexural strength and consequently the clinical longevity of a printed denture base.

Manufacturing accuracy of the intaglio surface of definitive resin-ceramic crowns fabricated at different print orientations by using a stereolithography printer

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Stereolithography (SLA) procedures can be chosen for manufacturing definitive crowns; however, how the print orientation impacts the trueness and precision of the intaglio surface of the printed definitive restorations is unclear.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro investigation was to calculate the manufacturing accuracy of the intaglio surface of SLA definitive resin-ceramic crowns fabricated at varying print orientations (0, 45, 75, or 90 degrees).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The standard tessellation language (STL) file of an anatomic contour molar crown was obtained and used to fabricate all the crowns by using a definitive resin-ceramic material (Permanent Crown) and an SLA printer (Form 3B+). Four groups were developed depending on the print orientation selected to manufacture the crowns: 0-, 45-, 70-, and 90-degree print orientation (n=30). Each crown specimen was digitized without the use of scanning powder by using a desktop scanner (T710). The crown design file was determined as the reference (control) group and used to calculate the fabricating trueness and precision of the intaglio surface of the specimens using the root mean square (RMS) error computation. Trueness data were examined by using 1-way ANOVA and post hoc pairwise multiple comparison Tukey tests, while precision data were analyzed using the Levene test (α=.05).

RESULTS

The mean ±standard deviation RMS error discrepancies ranged from 37 ±3 μm to 113 ±11 μm. One-way ANOVA exposed significant trueness (P<.001) differences among the groups considered in this study. Furthermore, all the print orientation groups tested were different from each other (P<.001). The 0-degree group presented the best trueness value (37 μm), while the 90-degree group obtained the worst trueness value (113 μm). The Levene test exposed significant precision differences among the groups assessed (P<.001). The 0-degree group had a significantly lower standard deviation (higher precision) (3 μm) than the other groups, with no difference among the other groups tested (P>.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The fabricating trueness and precision of the intaglio surface of the SLA resin-ceramic crowns was impacted by the varying print orientations assessed.

Flexural Strength, Fatigue Behavior, and Microhardness of Three-Dimensional (3D)-Printed Resin Material for Indirect Restorations: A Systematic Review

The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate three mechanical properties of 3D-printed resins for indirect restorations according to published scientific evidence. This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA statement (preferred reporting elements for systematic reviews and meta-analyses). The search was performed by two investigators, (DD) and (VB), and a third (AC) resolved disagreements. Articles were searched in four digital databases: PubMed, EBSCO, Lilacs, and Science Direct, starting on 18 February 2024. As 3D-printing technology has shown significant advances in the last 5 years, the review was conducted with a publication year range between 2019 and 2024, in English language and included in vitro articles on the mechanical properties of flexural strength, fatigue behavior, and microhardness of 3D-printed materials for temporary or definitive restorations. MeSH terms and free terms were used for the titles and abstracts of each article. Finally, the QUIN tool was used to assess the risk of bias. In the main search, 227 articles were found, of which 20 duplicates were excluded, leaving 207 articles; of these, titles and abstracts were read, and 181 that did not meet the eligibility criteria were eliminated; of the remaining 26 articles, 1 article was eliminated for not presenting quantitative results. Regarding publication bias, 6 of the 25 articles had a low risk of bias, 18 had a medium risk of bias, and 1 had a high risk of bias. It may be concluded that 3D-printed resins have lower flexural strength, fatigue behavior, and microhardness than other resin types used for the fabrication of temporary and permanent restorations. The type of 3D printer and polymerization time could be factors that significantly affect the flexural strength, fatigue behavior and microhardness of 3D-printed resins. Based on existing evidence, it should be considered that additive technology has promising future prospects for temporary and permanent dental restorations.

Three-Dimensional-Printed Photopolymer Resin Materials: A Narrative Review on Their Production Techniques and Applications in Dentistry

Additive manufacturing (3D printing) has transformed dentistry by providing solutions with high precision and accuracy achieved through digital workflows, which facilitate the creation of intricate and personalized structures. Additionally, 3D printing promotes cost efficiency by reducing material waste and errors while enabling on-demand production, minimizing the need for extensive inventories. Recent advancements in 3D-printed resin materials have enhanced their clinical applications by improving mechanical strength, biocompatibility, esthetics, and durability. These innovations have facilitated the fabrication of complex and patient-specific structures, such as dental prostheses, surgical guides, and orthodontic appliances, while significantly reducing production time and material waste. Ongoing research and innovation are expected to strengthen resin properties, including strength, translucency, and durability, broadening their clinical applications. The ongoing evolution of 3D printing technology is poised to play a critical role in driving personalized treatments, streamlining clinical workflows, and shaping the future of dental care. This narrative review comprehensively examines the production techniques and clinical applications of 3D-printed photopolymer resins across various dental specialties, including prosthodontics, orthodontics, pediatric dentistry, maxillofacial surgery, periodontology, endodontics, and conservative dentistry. Additionally, the review provides insight into the transformative impact of these technologies on patient care, highlights existing challenges, and suggests future directions for advancing resin properties and their integration into routine dental practice.

Influence of print orientation on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of diagnostic casts manufactured with a daylight polymer printer

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Print orientation may affect the manufacturing accuracy of vat-polymerized diagnostic casts. However, its influence should be analyzed based on the manufacturing trinomial (technology, printer, and material) and printing protocol used to manufacture the casts.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to measure the influence of different print orientations on the manufacturing accuracy of vat-polymerized polymer diagnostic casts.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A standard tessellation language (STL) reference file containing a maxillary virtual cast was used to manufacture all specimens using a vat-polymerization daylight polymer printer (Photon mono SE. LCD 2K) and a model resin (Phrozen Aqua Gray 4K). All specimens were manufactured using the same printing parameters, except for print orientation. Five groups were created depending on the print orientation: 0, 22.5, 45, 67.5, and 90 degrees (n=10). Each specimen was digitized using a desktop scanner. The discrepancy between the reference file and each of the digitized printed casts was measured using the Euclidean measurements and root mean square (RMS) error (Geomagic Wrap v.2017). Independent (unpaired) sample t tests and multiple pairwise comparisons using the Bonferroni test were used to analyze the trueness of the Euclidean distances and RMS data. Precision was assessed using the Levene test (α=.05).

RESULTS

In terms of Euclidean measurements, significant differences in trueness and precision values were found among the groups tested (P<.001). The 22.5- and 45-degree groups resulted in the best trueness values, and the 67.5-degree group had the lowest trueness value. The 0- and 90-degree groups led to the best precision values, while the 22.5-, 45-, and 67.5-degree groups showed the lowest precision values. Analyzing the RMS error calculations, significant differences in trueness and precision values were found among the groups tested (P<.001). The 22.5-degree group had the best trueness value, and the 90-degree group resulted in the lowest trueness value among the groups. The 67.5-degree group led to the best precision value, and the 90-degree group to the lowest precision value among the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Print orientation influenced the accuracy of diagnostic casts fabricated by using the selected printer and material. However, all specimens had clinically acceptable manufacturing accuracy ranging between 92 μm and 131 μm.

3D-printed one-piece versus two-piece orthodontic clear aligner attachments bonded with provisional crowns: A proof of concept

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to introduce a novel technique for fabricating provisional crowns integrated as a single unit with aligner attachments.

METHODS

A total of 60 crowns with attachments were prepared: 20 conventional (Protemp) and 40 3D-printed (20 bonded with attachments; 20 integrated with composite attachments as a single unit) using NextDent resin. Two central incisors were scanned (once without attachments and once with attachments) to create STL files for specimen printing. Half of the specimens (30, n = 10 per group) underwent thermal cycling (5000 cycles). Shear bond strengths (MPa) were evaluated using a universal testing machine. The debonded areas and attachment failures were analyzed to determine the fracture type. Data analyses were performed using ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

The 3D-printed specimens showed higher strength values than the bonded attachments per group (P < 0.001). The 3D-printed crowns with attachments demonstrated the highest strength (12.39 ± 1.92 MPa). Thermal cycling significantly decreased the bond strength of the attachments (P < 0.001), except in the 3D-printed crowns with composite attachments as a single unit, which showed no significant change after thermal cycling (P = 0.643). In the bonded attachment groups, the adhesive type was the predominant failure mode, while in the 3D-printed groups, attachment fractures were the primary cause of failure.

CONCLUSION

The 3D-printed provisional crowns with attachments have high strength and is clinically appropriate for orthodontic treatment when temporization of teeth is indicated.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The developed technique for fabricating 3D-printed provisional restorations with orthodontics attachments as a single unit is a promising approach. The technique may be incorporated into the digital orthodontic treatment workflow when temporization is indicated.

Zirconia crowns manufactured using digital light processing: Effects of build angle and layer thickness on the accuracy

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the effects of build angle and layer thickness on the trueness and precision of zirconia crowns manufactured using digital light processing (DLP) technology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Single crowns were fabricated from zirconia using DLP technology. The crowns were manufactured with three different representative build angles (0°, 45°, and 90°) and two different layer thicknesses (30 μm and 50 μm). After printing, the specimens were non-contact-scanned, and their accuracy was assessed using a 3D analysis software. Root mean square (RMS) values were used to determine trueness and precision. Color maps were generated to detect deviations within the specimens. Statistical analyses were conducted using two-way ANOVA.

RESULTS

Build angle and layer thickness significantly affected trueness and precision (p < 0.05). At a 30-μm layer thickness, the crowns printed at angles of 0° (32.2 ± 3.2 μm) and 45° (33.9 ± 2.4 μm) demonstrated the best marginal trueness compared to those in other groups (p < 0.05). Notably, those printed at an angle of 90° exhibited the best intaglio surface trueness (37.4 ± 4.0 μm). At a 50-μm layer thickness, the crowns printed at an angle of 90° exhibited the lowest accuracy concerning marginal and intaglio surface aspects (27.7 ± 8.2 μm).

CONCLUSIONS

Both the build angle and layer thickness significantly affected the dimensional accuracy of DLP-printed zirconia crowns, with the 30-μm layer thickness offering superior trueness. Optimal results were achieved using build angles of 0° and 45° in conjunction with thinner layers, minimizing marginal defects.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

All zirconia crowns produced at different build angles and layer thicknesses satisfied clinical requirements. Specific combinations of these factors realized the fabrication of single crowns that possessed the highest accuracy.

Annual review of selected scientific literature: A report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry

The Scientific Investigation Committee of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry offers this review of select 2023 dental literature to briefly touch on several topics of interest to modern restorative dentistry. Each committee member brings discipline-specific expertize in their subject areas that include (in order of appearance here): prosthodontics; periodontics, alveolar bone, and peri-implant tissues; dental materials and therapeutics; occlusion and temporomandibular disorders; sleep-related breathing disorders; oral medicine, oral and maxillofacial surgery, and oral radiology; and dental caries and cariology. The authors have focused their efforts on presenting information likely to influence the daily dental treatment decisions of the reader with an emphasis on current innovations, new materials and processes, emerging technology, and future trends in dentistry. With the overwhelming volume of literature published daily in dentistry and related disciplines, this review cannot be comprehensive. Instead, its purpose is to inform and update interested readers and provide valuable resource material for those willing to subsequently pursue greater detail on their own. Our intent remains to assist colleagues in navigating the tremendous volume of newly minted information produced annually. Finally, we hope readers find this work helpful in providing evidence-based care to patients seeking healthier and happier lives.

Influence of base designs on the manufacturing accuracy of vat-polymerized diagnostic casts using two different technologies

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Diagnostic casts can incorporate different base designs and be manufactured using different vat-polymerization technologies. However, the influence of the interrelation between the base design and the 3D printing technology on the casts' final accuracy remains unclear.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the influence of different base designs of 3D printed casts on the accuracy of 2 vat-polymerization technologies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A digital maxillary cast was obtained and used to generate 3 different base designs: solid (S group), honeycombed (HC group), and hollow (H group). The HC and H groups were subdivided based on the wall thickness of the cast design, resulting in 2 subgroups with thicknesses of 1 mm (HC1 and H1) and 2 mm (HC2 and H2) (N=100, n=10). Eleven reference cubes were added to each specimen for subsequent measurements. Specimens were manufactured by using 2 vat-polymerization 3D printers: Nextdent 5100 (ND group) and Sonic Mini 4K (SM4K group) and a resin material suitable for both 3D printers (Nextdent Model 2.0). A coordinate measuring machine quantified the linear and 3-dimensional discrepancies between the digital cast and each reference specimen. Trueness was defined as the average absolute dimensional discrepancy between the virtual cast and the specimens produced through additive manufacturing (AM), while precision was delineated as the standard deviation in dimensional discrepancies between the digital cast and the AM specimens. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U pairwise comparison tests (α=.05).

RESULTS

For the NextDent group the trueness ranged from 21.83 µm to 28.35 µm, and the precision ranged from 17.82 µm to 37.70 µm. For the Phrozen group, the trueness ranged from 45.15 µm to 64.51 µm, and the precision ranged from 33.51 µm to 48.92 µm. The Kruskal-Wallis test showed significant differences on the x-, y-, and z-axes and in the 3D discrepancy (all P<.001). On the x-axis, the Mann-Whitney U test showed significant differences for the Phrozen group between the H-2 and H-1 groups (P=.001), H-2 and S groups (P<.001), and HC-2 and S groups (P=.012). On the y-axis, significant differences were found in the Phrozen group between the H-2 and H-1 groups (P=.001), the H-2 and S, H-1 and HC-1, and HC-1 and S groups (P<.001), the H-1 and HC-2 groups (P=.007), and the HC-2 and S groups (P=.009). The NextDent group exhibited significant differences, particularly among the HC-1 and H-2 groups (P=.004), H-1 (P=.020), and HC-2 (P=.001) groups; and on the z-axis significant differences were found in the Phrozen group between the H-2 and H-1 and S groups and the HC-2 group and H-1 and S groups (both P<.001). In the NextDent group, significant differences were found between the H-2 and HC-2 (P=.047) and HC-1 (P=.028) groups. For the 3D discrepancy analysis, significant differences were found in the Phrozen group between the H-2 and H-1 and S groups (P<.001), the H-1 and HC-2 groups (P=.001), the S and HC-1 and HC-2 groups (P<.001), and the H-1 and HC-1 groups (P=.002). In the NextDent group, significant differences were observed between the H-2 and HC-1 groups (P=.012).

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of digital casts depends on the manufacturing trinomial and base design of the casts. The honeycomb and hollow based designs provided the highest accuracy in the NextDent and Phrozen groups respectively for the material polymer tested. All specimens fell in the clinically acceptable range.

Effect of layer thickness and polishing on wear resistance of additively manufactured occlusal splints

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of polishing and layering thickness on the wear resistance of 3D-printed occlusal splint materials.

METHODS

Specimens with 3 different layer thicknesses (50, 75, 100 µm) were produced in the form of a disc 3 mm thick using V-Print splint resin on a 3D-printer with digital light processing technology. (n = 16 for each thickness) All specimens were washed and cured according to the manufacturer's instructions. Half of the specimens of each layer thickness were polished with silicon carbide papers. All specimens were subjected to 120.000 cycles of a chewing simulator for 2-body wear tests. Before and after the wear test, the specimens were scanned with a laser scanner, and the images were overlaid using a 3D analysis program and the volume loss was calculated. The wear patterns of the specimens were examined under a scanning electron microscope. Statistical evaluation was performed using a Shapiro-Wilk test, 2-way ANOVA, 1-way ANOVA, and Tukey post hoc test (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

While polishing had a significant effect (p = 0.003) on the wear volume of the occlusal splints, layer thickness (p = 0.105) and their interaction between polishing and layer thickness (p = 0.620) did not significantly affect the wear volume. Regardless of the polishing, the lowest mean wear was observed for D50 (0.064 mm3), followed by D75 (0.078 mm3), and D100 (0.096 mm3). However, a significant difference was observed only between polished D50 and unpolished D100.

CONCLUSION

The polished 3D-printed occlusal splint resin showed higher wear resistance than the unpolished one, regardless of the layer thickness.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Since different layer thicknesses of 50 µm and greater had no effect on the wear resistance of the material, a layer thickness of 100 µm may be preferred for faster printing. However, polishing occlusal splints may reduce the amount of wear and improve clinical performance.

Effect of Post-Printing Conditions on the Mechanical and Optical Properties of 3D-Printed Dental Resin

This study aimed to evaluate the flexural strength (FS), surface wear, and optical properties of 3D-printed dental resins subjected to different post-printing conditions. A total of 240 specimens (2 × 2 × 25 mm³) were 3D-printed using resin materials for permanent (VaresoSmile Crown Plus) VSC and temporary (VaresoSmile Temp) VST restorations. Specimens underwent five post-printing conditions: no post-printing cure; post-cured in a Form Cure curing unit; Visio Beta Vacuum; Ivoclar Targis; or heat-cured (150 °C) for 30 min. Each group of specimens (n = 24) was tested either directly after post-curing, after 24 h of dry storage, or following hydrothermal accelerated aging in boiling water for 16 h. The three-point bending test was used to evaluate the FS. The two-body wear test was performed on 50 disc-shaped specimens (n = 5/group). Surface gloss and translucency were measured for permanent VSC specimens (n = 5/group). SEM/EDS and statistical analyses were performed. The Form Cure device yielded the highest FS and lowest wear depth (p < 0.05). Hydrothermal aging significantly reduced FS. There were no statistical differences in FS and wear values between materials subjected to same post-printing conditions. VSC groups exhibited similar optical properties across different post-printing treatments. Post-printing treatment conditions had a significant impact on the FS and wear of the 3D-printed resin, while optical properties remained unaffected.

Influence of print orientation and wet-dry storage time on the intaglio accuracy of additively manufactured occlusal devices

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Different factors can affect the manufacturing accuracy of additively manufactured dental devices; however, the influence of print orientation and wet-dry storage time on their intaglio accuracy remains uncertain.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the effect of print orientation (0, 45, 70, and 90 degrees) and wet-dry storage time (0, 30, 60, and 90 days) on the intaglio accuracy of additively manufactured occlusal devices.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An occlusal device design was obtained in a standard tessellation language (STL) file format (control file) which was used to fabricate all the specimens by using a stereolithography printer (Form 3+) and a biocompatible resin material (Dental LT Clear Resin, V2). Four groups were created based on the print orientation used to manufacture the specimens: 0, 45, 70, and 90 degrees. Each group was divided into 4 subgroups depending on the time elapsed between manufacturing and accuracy evaluation: 0, 30, 60, and 90 days. For the subgroup 0, a desktop scanner (T710) was used to digitize all the specimens. The 30-day subgroup specimens were stored for 30 days with the following daily storage protocol: 16 hours inside a dry lightproof container, followed by 8 hours in artificial saliva (1700-0305 Artificial Saliva) inside the same lightproof container. The specimens were then digitized by following the same procedures used for subgroup 0. For the subgroups 60 and 90, the identical procedures described for subgroup 30 were completed but after 60 and 90 days of storage, respectively. The reference STL file was used to measure the intaglio discrepancy with the experimental scans obtained among the different subgroups by using the root mean square error calculation. Two-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey pairwise comparison tests were used to analyze the data (α=.05).

RESULTS

Print orientation (P<.001) and usage time (P<.001) were significant predictors of the trueness value obtained. Additionally, the 0-degree print orientation at day 0 group demonstrated the best trueness value among all the groups tested (P<.05). No significant trueness discrepancies were found among the 45-, 70-, and 90-degree print orientation, or among the 30, 60, and 90 days of storage. A significant precision difference was found in the variance between print orientation groups across usage time subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

The print orientation and wet-dry storage times tested influenced the trueness and precision of the intaglio surfaces of the occlusal devices manufactured with the 3D printer and material selected.

Influence of printing orientation on mechanical properties of aged 3D-printed restorative resins

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the influence of printing orientation on flexural strength (σf) and elastic modulus (E) of different 3D printing dental restorative resins.

METHODS

Bar-shaped specimens (n = 20) were fabricated from two SLA-printed resins (FT- Formlabs Temporary, and FP- Formlabs Permanent) and two DLP-printed resins (DFT- Detax Freeprint Temp, and GCT- GC Temporary) using two building orientations (0º and 90º). The 3D-printed structures were aged (14 d) before submitted to three-point bending in 37ºC distilled water at a crosshead speed of 1.0 ± 0.3 mm/min until fracture to calculate the σf and the E values. The fractured surfaces were evaluated using stereomicroscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) following fractography principles. Data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc (α = 0.001).

RESULTS

FP and FT showed significantly higher E values than DFT and GCT, irrespectively of printing orientation (p < 0.001). There was no statistical difference between the building orientations (0º and 90º) for the mean σf and E values for the resin materials evaluated. Fractographic characteristics were similar for the surface fracture from all the materials evaluated, showing typical brittle fracture behavior.

SIGNIFICANCE

Printing orientation did not influence of flexural strength and elastic modulus values for the 3D-printed resin structures evaluated. Surface topography was mostly governed by the 3D printer type.

Effect of build orientation on the fracture resistance and marginal quality of 3D-printed anatomic provisional crowns: An in-vitro study

Introduction

Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technologies have been increasingly used to fabricate provisional restorations in recent years. This study assessed how build orientation influences the fracture resistance and marginal quality of 3D-printed crowns compared with milled provisional crowns.

Methods

The test group included 3D-printed crowns (Freeprint temp Shade A2, Detax, Ettlingen, Germany), which were further subdivided based on print orientation (0°, 45°, and 90°; n = 10 for each subgroup). The control group (n = 10) included milled crowns (Coratemp, White Peaks, Germany) with the same design as those of the test group. The margin quality of each crown was assessed at 60 × magnification using a digital stereomicroscope. A load-to-fracture test was performed by applying a force at a rate of 2 mm/min to assess fracture resistance. One sample from each subgroup was also subjected to scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis.

Results

The milled group exhibited the highest fracture resistance and marginal quality. Within the printed subgroups, the 0° group showed the best mean marginal quality, whereas the 90° group showed the lowest mean marginal quality (p < 0.05). Within the test groups, the 90° group had the highest mean fracture resistance (p < 0.05). In the SEM analysis, the milled group exhibited the most homogenous boundaries, whereas among the 3D-printed subgroups, the samples printed at 0° had the best margin quality.

Conclusion

The manufacturing method significantly influences the marginal quality and fracture resistance. Milled crowns demonstrated superior marginal quality and fracture resistance compared to those of 3D printed crowns. Furthermore, the print orientation of 0° led to the best marginal quality, whereas printing at 90° led to the highest fracture resistance.

Effect of print orientation, storage conditions, and storage time on intaglio surface accuracy of implant surgical guides fabricated by using a stereolithography technology

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The accuracy of printed implant surgical guides can be affected by different factors that negatively impact the planned implant position. How print orientation, storage time, and conditions influence manufacturing accuracy remains uncertain.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of print orientation, storage conditions, and storage time on the intaglio surface accuracy of implant surgical guides manufactured by using a stereolithography (SLA) printer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A tooth-supported maxillary implant surgical guide design (control file) was used to fabricate the specimens (N=40, n=10). Four groups were created based on the print orientation used: 0 (Group 0), 45 (Group 45), 70 (Group 70), and 90 degrees (Group 90). The specimens were fabricated using an SLA printer (Form 3B+) and a biocompatible dental resin (Surgical Guide Resin V1) following the manufacturer's recommended protocol. Each group was divided into 2 subgroups based on the storage conditions: light (L subgroup) and dark (D subgroup) settings. Each specimen was digitized by using a desktop scanner (Medit T710) at days 0, 1, 7, and 14. The control file and each digitized specimen were superimposed by using the best-fit technique with a metrology program (Geomagic Control X). The root mean square (RMS) error was used to calculate the discrepancies between the control files and specimen files. Three-way ANOVA and pairwise comparison Tukey tests were used to analyze trueness. The Levene test was used to assess precision (α=.05).

RESULTS

Significant trueness discrepancies were found among the groups tested (P<.001), but no significant differences were found among the subgroups (P=.100) and the storage times analyzed (P=.609). Additionally, the Tukey test showed significant RMS error mean value discrepancies between Group 0 and Group 45 (P<.001), Group 0 and Group 90 (P<.001), Group 45 and Group 70 (P<.001), and Group 70 and Group 90 (P<.001). The Levene test revealed significant SD discrepancies among the groups tested (P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The trueness and precision of the intaglio surface of the implant surgical guides manufactured by using the printer and material tested were affected by the print orientation. However, storage conditions over a 14-day period did not impact the intaglio accuracy of the specimens.