Time to cranial computerised tomography for acute traumatic brain injury in paediatric patients: Effect of the shorter stays in emergency departments target in New Zealand

Effect of removing the 4-hour access standard in the ED: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Time-based targets are used to improve patient flow and quality of care within EDs. While previous research often highlighted the benefits of these targets, some studies found negative consequences of their implementation. We study the consequences of removing the 4-hour access standard.

METHODS

We conducted a before and after, retrospective, observational study using anonymised, routinely collected, patient-level data from a single English NHS ED between April 2018 and December 2019. The primary outcomes of interest were the proportion of admitted patients, that is, the admission rate, the length of stay in the ED and ambulance handover times. We used interrupted time series models to study and estimate the impact of removing the 4-hour access standard.

RESULTS

A total of 169 916 attendances were included in the analysis. The interrupted time series models for the average daily admission rate indicate a drop from an estimated 35% to an estimated 31% (95% CI -4.1 to -3.9). This drop is only statistically significant for Majors (Ambulant) patients (from an estimated 38.3% to an estimated 31.4%) and, particularly, for short-stay admissions (from an estimated 18.1% to an estimated 12.8%). The models also show an increase in the average daily length of stay for admitted patients from an estimated 316 min to an estimated 387 min (95% CI 33.5 to 108.9), and an increase in the average daily length of stay for discharged patients from an estimated 222 min to an estimated 262 min (95% CI 6.9 to 40.4).

CONCLUSION

Lifting the 4-hour access standard reporting was associated with a drop in short-stay admissions to the hospital. However, it was also associated with an increase in the average length of stay in the ED. Our study also suggests that the removal of the 4-hour standard does not impact all patients equally. While certain patient groups such as those Majors (Ambulant) patients with less severe issues might have benefited from the removal of the 4-hour access standard by avoiding short-stay hospital admissions, the average length of stay in the ED seemed to have increased across all groups, particularly for older and admitted patients.

Review article: Has the implementation of time-based targets for emergency department length of stay influenced the quality of care for patients? A systematic review of quantitative literature

Time-based targets (TBTs) for ED stays were introduced to improve quality of care but criticised as having harmful unintended consequences. The aim of the review was to determine whether implementation of TBTs influenced quality of care. Structured searches in medical databases were undertaken (2000-2019). Studies describing a state, regional or national TBTs that reported processes or outcomes of care related to the target were included. Harvest plots were used to summarise the evidence. Thirty-three studies (n = 34 million) were included. In some settings, reductions in mortality were seen in ED, in hospital and at 30 days, while in other settings mortality was unchanged. Mortality reductions were seen in the face of increasing age and acuity of presentations, when short-stay admissions were excluded, and when pre-target temporal trends were accounted for. ED crowding, time to assessment and admission times reduced. Fewer patients left prior to completing their care and fewer patients re-presented to EDs. Short-stay admissions and re-admissions to wards within 30 days increased. There was conflicting evidence regarding hospital occupancy and ward medical emergency calls, while times to treatment for individual conditions did not change. The evidence for associations was mostly low certainty and confidence in the findings is accordingly low. Quality of care generally improved after targets were introduced and when compliance with targets was high. This depended on how targets were implemented at individual sites or within jurisdictions, with important implications for policy makers, health managers and clinicians.

Implementation strategies in emergency management of children: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Implementation strategies are vital for the uptake of evidence to improve health, healthcare delivery, and decision-making. Medical or mental emergencies may be life-threatening, especially in children, due to their unique physiological needs when presenting in the emergency departments (EDs). Thus, practice change in EDs attending to children requires evidence-informed considerations regarding the best approaches to implementing research evidence. We aimed to identify and map the characteristics of implementation strategies used in the emergency management of children.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review using Arksey and O'Malley's framework. We searched four databases [Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Cochrane Central (Wiley) and CINAHL (Ebsco)] from inception to May 2019, for implementation studies in children (≤21 years) in emergency settings. Two pairs of reviewers independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted the data. We performed a descriptive analysis of the included studies.

RESULTS

We included 87 studies from a total of 9,607 retrieved citations. Most of the studies were before and after study design (n = 68, 61%) conducted in North America (n = 63, 70%); less than one-tenth of the included studies (n = 7, 8%) were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). About one-third of the included studies used a single strategy to improve the uptake of research evidence. Dissemination strategies were more commonly utilized (n = 77, 89%) compared to other implementation strategies; process (n = 47, 54%), integration (n = 49, 56%), and capacity building and scale-up strategies (n = 13, 15%). Studies that adopted capacity building and scale-up as part of the strategies were most effective (100%) compared to dissemination (90%), process (88%) and integration (85%).

CONCLUSIONS

Studies on implementation strategies in emergency management of children have mostly been non-randomized studies. This review suggests that 'dissemination' is the most common strategy used, and 'capacity building and scale-up' are the most effective strategies. Higher-quality evidence from randomized-controlled trials is needed to accurately assess the effectiveness of implementation strategies in emergency management of children.

Time to CT head in adult patients with suspected traumatic brain injury: Association with the 'Shorter Stays in Emergency Departments' health target in Aotearoa New Zealand

A national health target for length of stay in emergency departments (ED) was introduced in 2009 to reduce crowding and improve quality of care. We aimed to determine whether the target was associated with changes in time to CT and appropriateness of CT imaging, as markers of care quality for suspected acute traumatic brain injury (TBI). We undertook a retrospective review of the case records of a random sample of people aged ≥15 years presenting to the ED with TBI from 2006 to 2013. General linear models were used to investigate changes in outcomes along with routine process times before and after the introduction of the target. Among 501 eligible cases the median (IQR) time to CT was 136 (76-247) pre target versus 119 (59-209) minutes post target, p = 0.014. The proportion of appropriate imaging was similar between periods: 77.9% (95% CI 71-83%) versus 76.6% (95%CI 72-81%), p = 0.825. Interactions suggested that the time to CT and appropriateness of imaging before and after the introduction of the target varied by ethnicity, although the changes were not clinically important. Time to assessment and length of stay did not change importantly. We found no evidence of a clinically important change in time to CT or appropriateness of imaging for suspected TBI in association with the introduction of the SSED time target. Additional research with larger cohorts of Māori and Pacific participants is recommended to understand our observed patterns by ethnicity.

Towards a best measure of emergency department crowding: Lessons from current Australasian practice

OBJECTIVE

Despite extensive literature, how crowding in EDs should be measured is still debated. The present study aimed to describe crowding metrics used in Australasia, what they were used for, the perceived extent and frequency of crowding and the challenges faced when trying to measure crowding.

METHODS

A survey of ED clinical directors was undertaken between December 2014 and July 2015. Free-text responses were categorised and thematically coded. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and with logistic regression.

RESULTS

There were 113 of 145 responses (78%). Crowding was considered a major problem by 84 of 113 (74%) and not rare by 88 of 111 participants (79%). These constructs were correlated; G = -0.851, P < 0.001. Levels 1-3 EDs were less likely to report crowding as a major problem than Level 4 EDs; odds ratio 0.15 (0.03-0.69), P = 0.02. Sixteen current metrics were identified and categorised into 'time', 'occupancy' and 'workload' metrics. These categories of metric were used differently, and multiple metrics had more uses than single metrics. Previously described complex crowding metrics were infrequently recognised (<20%). Common challenges to measuring crowding were lack of an agreed metric (40%) and lack of buy-in by inpatient teams or hospital management (35%).

CONCLUSION

ED crowding remains a common and important problem in Australasia. Crowding is multifaceted, so a single metric might not capture all important elements of crowding or be relevant to all stakeholders. However, a metric like Access Block, which encompasses elements of time, occupancy and workload and is relevant to stakeholders outside the ED, might hold the most promise.