Standard procedures for the diagnostic pathway of sleep-related epilepsies and comorbid sleep disorders: A European Academy of Neurology, European Sleep Research Society and International League against Epilepsy-Europe consensus review

Multidisciplinary providers' perceptions of care delivery for sleep disorders: A qualitative case study

OBJECTIVES

Sleep disorders are wide-ranging in their causes and impacts on other physical and mental health conditions. Thus, sleep disorders could benefit from a multidisciplinary approach to assessment and treatment. An integrated care model is often recommended but is costly to implement. We sought to understand how, in the absence of an established organizational structure for integrated sleep care, providers from different clinics work together to provide care for sleep disorders.

METHODS

A qualitative case study at one U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical center. We used a purposeful nested sampling strategy, combining maximum variation sampling and snowball sampling to recruit key staff involved in sleep care.

RESULTS

We interviewed providers (N = 10) from sleep medicine, primary care, and mental health services. Providers identified the ubiquity of sleep disorders and a concomitant need for multidisciplinary care. However, they described limited opportunities for multidisciplinary interactions and consequently a negative impact on clinical care. Providers described fragmentation in two areas: among sleep specialists and between sleep specialists and other referring and managing providers.

CONCLUSIONS

A range of interventions, based on setting and resources, could improve care coordination both among sleep specialists and between sleep and nonsleep providers. While integrated sleep specialist clinics could reduce care fragmentation, they may not directly impact coordination with referring providers, like primary care and general mental health, who are essential in managing chronic conditions. Future work should continue to explore improving care coordination for sleep problems to ensure patients receive high-quality, timely, patient-centered care.

Challenges in diagnosing NREM parasomnias: Implications for future diagnostic classifications

NREM parasomnias are frequent and potentially disabling sleep disorders characterized by recurrent abnormal behaviors emerging from NREM sleep. Recently, several studies provided more detailed clinical and polysomnographic characterization of NREM parasomnia which may enhance the diagnostic process. Several revisions of the diagnostic criteria have been proposed in the classification of sleep disorders, the latest being ICSD-3-TR in 2023 with no changes on NREM parasomnias since ICSD-3 published in 2014. We performed an extensive literature review to assess the evidence on the procedure of its diagnosis. We dissected the inconsistencies and shortcomings in the ICSD-3-TR to propose a revision of the current diagnostic criteria. We highlighted the limits of several clinical criteria which should rather be supportive features than mandatory criteria. Infrared cameras with video-recordings with are promising tools to precisely characterize home episodes. Sensitive and specific polysomnographic markers of NREM parasomnias have been identified and should be considered in future revisions. We also suggest the use of diagnostic specifiers (clinical subtypes, clinical significance, levels of severity, age effect, levels of certainty) to define homogeneous subgroups of patients for therapeutic intervention and research purposes. In conclusion, we advocate for significant changes in the current diagnostic criteria of NREM parasomnias for future classification.

Sleep and epilepsy: A clinical and pathophysiological overview

The interaction between sleep and epilepsy is complex. A better understanding of the mechanisms linking sleep and epilepsy appears increasingly important as it may improve diagnosis and therapeutic strategies in patients with epilepsy. In this narrative review, we aim to (i) provide an overview of the physiological and pathophysiological processes linking sleep and epilepsy; (ii) present common sleep disorders in patients with epilepsy; (iii) discuss how sleep and sleep disorders should be considered in new therapeutic approaches to epilepsy such as neurostimulation; and (iv) present the overall nocturnal manifestations and differential diagnosis between epileptic seizures and parasomnia.

[The impact of antiepileptic therapy on sleep disorders in women with epilepsy]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the frequency of various sleep disorders in patients with epilepsy receiving antiepileptic therapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sixty-four women were selected from the register of patients with epilepsy and other paroxysmal conditions. The group consisted of young and middle-aged women (36.9±13.5 years), all patients received antiepileptic therapy. To diagnose sleep disorders, we used a sequential algorithm for clinical examination supplemented by instrumental methods according to indications (polysomnography, respiratory monitoring).

RESULTS

The duration of epilepsy was 15.7±7.6 years, the disease was represented by three forms: structural (n=15, 23.4%), genetic (n=32, 50%) and unspecified (n=17, 26.6%). Sleep disorders were common among female patients with epilepsy (43.7%), they are most frequently combined with genetic epilepsy (18.7%), and represented by: insomnia (43%) mild to moderately severe breathing disorders (32%) and sleep movement disorders (25%). Sleep disorders were combined with symptoms of depression in the majority of patients (71%). A 6-month follow-up evaluation of nighttime sleep parameters after treatment showed a decrease in the frequency of sleep disorders to 25%; scores on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale significantly decreased to 6.7±3.6. A change in antiepileptic therapy in patients with sleep breathing disorders resulted in a marked regression of the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (9.2±2.5 points; p=0.003). However, there were no significant changes in the severity of sleep movement disorders.

CONCLUSION

Sleep disorders are common in patients with epilepsy, in most cases they are associated with mood disorders, and may regress after optimization of antiepileptic therapy.

Sleep and epilepsy: A snapshot of knowledge and future research lines

Sleep and epilepsy have a reciprocal relationship, and have been recognized as bedfellows since antiquity. However, research on this topic has made a big step forward only in recent years. In this narrative review we summarize the most stimulating discoveries and insights reached by the "European school." In particular, different aspects concerning the sleep-epilepsy interactions are analysed: (a) the effects of sleep on epilepsy; (b) the effects of epilepsy on sleep structure; (c) the relationship between epilepsy, sleep and epileptogenesis; (d) the impact of epileptic activity during sleep on cognition; (e) the relationship between epilepsy and the circadian rhythm; (f) the history and features of sleep hypermotor epilepsy and its differential diagnosis; (g) the relationship between epilepsy and sleep disorders.

The additional diagnostic benefits of performing both video-polysomnography and prolonged video-EEG-monitoring: when and why

•

Video-polysomnography (VPSG) and prolonged video-EEG-monitoring (pVEEG-M) are indicated for different suspected diagnoses.

•

Here, we report on 109 patients who underwent both, VPSG and pVEEG-M, within a 10 year period.

•

Both examinations were performed in case of comorbidities, to achieve a final diagnosis or to refute differential diagnoses.

Objective

Video-polysomnography (VPSG) and prolonged video-EEG-monitoring (pVEEG-M) are neurophysiological investigation modalities. Depending on indication either is performed, but occasionally patients undergo both (during the same or separate stays). We sought to assess the reasons and potential benefits of dual diagnostic assessments with both modalities.

Methods

A retrospective chart-review was performed to identify patients who underwent both VPSG and pVEEG-M during the 10 year period between 2007 and 2017. One-hundred-nine patients were identified who had undergone both studies. Patients were grouped according to indication and outcome.

Results

One-hundred-nine patients had both, a VPSG and pVEEG-M, in 62 (56.9%) the studies were performed because of separate diagnoses independent from each other. In 47 patients (43.1%) investigation with both modalities was needed to clarify the suspected diagnosis or to refute differential diagnoses. Out of these 47, 11 (10.1% of the whole group) arrived a new final diagnosis whereas in 36 (33%) the primary diagnosis was corroborated with the second modality.

Conclusions

In the majority of cases VPSG plus pVEEG-M were indicated to diagnose or monitor different comorbid diseases (e.g. sleep-related breathing disorder and epilepsy). In the other cases, performing both modalities was useful to achieve a higher diagnostic accuracy or to refute differential diagnoses.

Significance

VPSG and pVEEG-M are neurophysiological investigations which complement each other, especially in case of two different comorbid diseases in a single patient, to rule out differential diagnosis or when a higher diagnostic certainty is seeked.

Disorders of arousal and sleep-related hypermotor epilepsy - overview and challenges night is a battlefield of sleep and arousal promoting forces

Arousability and reactivity to sensory stimuli are essential features of sleep, discriminating it from coma and keeping the sleeper in contact with the environment. Arousals and oscillations during sleep serve the reversibility of sleep and carry an alarm function awakening the sleeper in danger. In this review, we will explore mechanisms and circuits involved in arousal intrusions within the sleep texture, focusing on the significance of these phenomena in two sleep-related conditions: NREM sleep parasomnias and sleep-related hypermotor epilepsy. Knowledges and gaps in the field are discussed.

Relationship Between Epilepsy and Dreaming: Current Knowledge, Hypotheses, and Perspectives

The interactions between epilepsy and sleep are numerous and the impact of epilepsy on cognition is well documented. Epilepsy is therefore likely to influence dreaming as one sleep-related cognitive activity. The frequency of dream recall is indeed decreased in patients with epilepsy, especially in those with primary generalized seizures. The content of dreams is also disturbed in epilepsy patients, being more negative and with more familiar settings. While several confounding factors (anti-seizure medications, depression and anxiety disorders, cognitive impairment) may partly account for these changes, some observations suggest an effect of seizures themselves on dreams. Indeed, the incorporation of seizure symptoms in dream content has been described, concomitant or not with a focal epileptic discharge during sleep, suggesting that epilepsy might directly or indirectly interfere with dreaming. These observations, together with current knowledge on dream neurophysiology and the links between epilepsy and sleep, suggest that epilepsy may impact not only wake- but also sleep-related cognition.

Drug Treatment of Epilepsy Neuropsychiatric Comorbidities in Children

There is increasing recognition that epilepsy can be associated with a broad spectrum of comorbidities. While epileptic seizures are an essential element of epilepsy in children, there is a spectrum of neurological, mental health and cognitive disorders that add to the disease burden of childhood epilepsy resulting in a decreased quality of life. The most common comorbid conditions in childhood epilepsy include depression, anxiety, autism spectrum disorders, sleep disorders, attention deficits, cognitive impairment, and migraine. While epilepsy can result in comorbidities, many of the comorbidities of childhood have a bi-directional association, with the comorbid condition increasing risk for epilepsy and epilepsy increasing the risk for the comorbid condition. The bidirectional feature of epilepsy and the comorbidities suggest a common underlying pathological basis for both the seizures and comorbid condition. While recognition of the comorbid conditions of pediatric epilepsies is increasing, there has been a lag in the development of effective therapies partly out of concern that drugs used to treat the comorbid conditions could increase seizure susceptibility. There is now some evidence that most drugs used for comorbid conditions are safe and do not lower seizure threshold. Unfortunately, the evidence showing drugs are effective in treating many of the childhood comorbidities of epilepsy is quite limited. There is a great need for randomized, placebo-controlled drug trials for efficacy and safety in the treatment of comorbidities of childhood epilepsy.