Interlaboratory variability in the measurement of direct oral anticoagulants: results from the external quality assessment scheme

Performance of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) testing by hemostasis laboratories: The Australasian/Asia-Pacific experience

INTRODUCTION

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) reflect anticoagulation agents given to treat or prevent thrombosis, having largely replaced vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) such as warfarin. DOACs are given in fixed daily doses and generally do not need monitoring. However, there may be a variety of reasons that justify measurement of plasma DOAC levels in individual patients.

METHODS

We report updated findings for DOAC testing in our geographic region, using recent data from the RCPAQAP, an international external quality assessment (EQA) program, currently with some 40-60 participants in each of the different DOAC (rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran) modules, to assess laboratory performance in this area. Data has been assessed for the past 5 years (2019-2023 inclusive), with 20 samples each per DOAC.

RESULTS

Data shows a limited repertoire of assays in use, and mostly consistency in reported numerical values when assessing proficiency samples. Available assays mostly comprised reagents from four manufacturing suppliers. There was good consistency across what participants identified as 'DOAC detected', but some variability when participants attempted to grade DOAC levels as low vs moderate vs high. Inter-laboratory/method coefficient of variation (CVs) were generally <15% for each DOAC, when present at >100 ng/mL.

CONCLUSION

We hope our findings, reflecting on mostly consistent reporting of DOAC levels and interpretation provides reassurance for clinicians requesting these measurements, and helps support their implementation in regions where there is a paucity of test availability.

Quantifying time from last dose: do direct oral anticoagulant assays correlate with patient's reported last dose

INTRODUCTION

In the absence of a patient's last direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) dose time, best practice regarding preoperative DOAC cessation remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate, in a real-life patient cohort, if there was an association between subjective patient recall and objective DOAC assay titre.

METHODS/MATERIALS

A multicentre cohort study of consecutive surgical inpatients was conducted. DOAC assays were 'expected' if they satisfied both time and titre-based guidelines.

RESULTS

Patient-recalled last dose and DOAC assay was available in 285 individuals. DOAC assay titres correlated strongly with the expected levels based on a patient's reported last dose time(rho = 0.70, P value < 0.0001). However, underweight (<50 kg; P  = 0.0339) and elderly (>80 years; P  = 0.0134) were more likely to have an unexpectedly high assay titre.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant portion (∼25%) of patients had unexpected DOAC titres. DOAC levels can be clinically impactful in a significant percentage of patients, particularly in elderly and/or underweight.

Bleeding management in patients with direct oral anticoagulants

Bleeding events in patients under direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) can be life-threating but are commonly not related to drug overdose. However, a relevant DOAC plasma concentration impairs the hemostasis and should therefore be ruled out immediately after hospital admission. The effect of DOAC is typically not visible in standard coagulation tests such as activated partial thrombin time or thromboplastin time. Specific anti-Xa or anti-IIa assays allow a specific drug monitoring, but they are too time-consuming in critical bleeding events and typically not available 24 h/7 d in routine care. Recent advantages in point-of-care (POC) testing might improve patient care by early exclusion of relevant DOAC levels, but sufficient validation is still lacking. POC urine analysis help to exclude DOAC in emergency patients, but does not provide a quantitative information about plasma concentration. POC viscoelastic testing (VET) can determine the DOAC effect on clotting time and helps further to reveal other concomitant bleeding disorders in emergency, e.g., factor deficiency or hyperfibrinolysis. If a relevant plasma concentration of the DOAC is assumed or was proven by either laboratory assays or POC testing, restoration of factor IIa or factor IIa activity is key for effective hemostasis. Limited evidence suggests that specific reversals for DOAC, e.g., idarucizumab for dabigatran and andexanet alfa for apixaban or rivaroxaban, might be superior to increasing thrombin generation by administration of prothrombin complex concentrates. To determinate, if DOAC reversal is indicated or not, time from last intake, anti-Xa/dTT values or results from POC tests can be considered. This experts' opinion provides a feasible decision algorithm for clinical practice.

The role of anticoagulation clinics needs to be reassessed to include follow up of patients on direct oral anticoagulants

A survey was carried out to assess the state of organization of care (including clinical and laboratory) delivered to patients on vitamin K antagonists (VKA) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) followed by clinics affiliated with the Italian Federation of Thrombosis Centers (FCSA), traditionally engaged to assist anticoagulated outpatients within the country. Participants were asked to answer questions concerning (i) proportion of patients on VKA-vs-DOAC and (ii) whether dedicated testing for DOAC is available. The proportion of patients on VKA-vs-DOAC was 60 % vs 40 %. This proportion is in sharp contrast with the real-life distribution where DOAC outweigh VKA prescriptions. Furthermore, the proportion of anticoagulation clinics that provide DOAC testing (even in special situations) is relatively small (i.e., 31 % of the respondents). Furthermore, 25 % of those that declared to follow DOAC patients do not provide any testing at all. The answers to the above questions cause concerns as (i) most patients on DOAC within the country are probably on self-management, or they are managed by general practitioners or specialists outside thrombosis centers. (ii) Most patients on DOAC have no access to testing even in special situations where it would be needed. We feel that there is a (false) perception that the care needed for DOAC treatment can be much less than that required for VKA, as DOAC require prescription and not regular follow-up. A call for action should be urgently made to reassess the role of anticoagulation clinics, which should pay the same attention to patients on DOAC as those on VKA.

Prothrombin Time-International Normalized Ratio Predicts the Outcome of Atrial Fibrillation Patients Taking Rivaroxaban

Background: Although direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are considered to be safe, over or under anticoagulation and increased bleeding or thromboembolic risk are still considered individually. We aimed to investigate whether there is an association between prothrombin time and international normalized ratio (PT-INR) or activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) ratio, and the risks of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (IS/SE) and major bleeding among AF patients taking rivaroxaban or dabigatran. Methods: This multi-center cohort study in Taiwan included 3192 AF patients taking rivaroxaban and 958 patients taking dabigatran for stroke prevention where data about PT-INR and aPTT were available. Results: For patients treated with rivaroxaban, a higher INR level was not associated with a higher risk of major bleeding compared to an INR level < 1.1. The risk of IS/SE was lower for patients having an INR ≥ 1.5 compared to those with an INR < 1.1 (aHR:0.57; [95%CI: 0.37−0.87]; p = 0.01). On-label dosing of rivaroxaban and use of digoxin were independent factors associated with an INR ≥ 1.5 after taking rivaroxaban. For patients taking dabigatran, a higher aPTT ratio was not associated with a higher risk of major bleeding. The risk of IS/SE was lower for patients having an aPTT ratio of 1.1−1.2 and 1.3−1.4 than those with an aPTT ratio < 1.1. Conclusions: In AF patients, rivaroxaban with an INR ≥ 1.5 was associated with a lower risk of IS/SE. PT-INR or aPTT ratios were not associated with bleeding events for rivaroxaban or dabigatran. INR may help predict the outcome of AF patients who take rivaroxaban.

Elevated International Normalized Ratio Due to Apixaban in Patient With End-Stage Renal Disease on Hemodialysis

Apixaban is known to prolong international normalized ratio (INR) per some observational and in vitro studies. In patients with elevated INR secondary to apixaban use, median INR of 1.4-1.7 has been reported. Extreme elevation in INR is rare with apixaban. In patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis (HD), there are no labeled indications for apixaban use; however, there are some pharmacokinetic data supporting its use in such patients.

We present a case of a 68-year-old Hispanic man with ESRD who presented to the emergency room (ER) with INR of 27.42. INR testing was done as a part of routine workup in rehabilitation facility. Medication list was reviewed and included apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily which was recently started for postoperative thromboprophylaxis. INR testing was repeated for confirmation in ER and was reported as >18.5 and prothrombin time >200 seconds. His liver function tests were stable as compared to baseline testing five days ago with normal bilirubin, low normal transaminases, and mild hypoalbuminemia. The patient didn’t have any active bleeding. An elevation of INR to >20 with apixaban is a rare event. No other factors including patient characteristics, laboratory results, co-existing conditions, or other medications except the direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) were found to be responsible for elevated INR. Liver cirrhosis or vitamin K deficiency as cause for INR elevation was ruled out as the baseline INR was normal prior to starting apixaban, liver function tests were stable and INR normalized again shortly after discontinuing the medication. Plasma concentration of DOACs has been found to be correlating with the INR according to a pharmacokinetic study which potentially means that the high INR likely was secondary to high serum concentration of apixaban in this patient. However, INR monitoring is not recommended for monitoring anticoagulant activity of DOACs. As of note, renal clearance accounts for 27% of apixaban clearance.

Pharmacokinetic studies have concluded that half dose apixaban, i.e., 2.5 mg twice daily in patients on hemodialysis (dose used in this case) results in drug exposure similar to that of the standard dose of 5 mg twice daily in patients with preserved renal function. Future studies are necessary to address questions about safety of DOACs in patients with ESRD, further elucidate the clinical significance of such high INR values associated with DOACs, and establish appropriate management guidelines. Andexanet alfa has since been approved for apixaban reversal in patients with life-threatening bleeding; however, would not be indicated in such cases when there is no evidence of bleeding.

The Interlaboratory Performance in Measurement of Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban: Results of the College of American Pathologists External Quality Assessment Program

CONTEXT.—

Assessing direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) drug levels by reliable laboratory assays is necessary in a number of clinical scenarios.

OBJECTIVE.—

To evaluate the performance of DOAC-specific assays for various concentrations of dabigatran and rivaroxaban, assess the interlaboratory variability in measurement of these DOACs, and investigate the responsiveness of the routine clotting assays to various concentrations of these oral anticoagulants.

DESIGN.—

College of American Pathologists proficiency testing survey data from 2013 to 2016 were summarized and analyzed.

RESULTS.—

For dabigatran, the interlaboratory coefficient of variation (CV) of ecarin chromogenic assay was broad (ranging from 7.5% to 29.1%, 6.3% to 15.5%, and 6.8% to 9.0% for 100-ng/mL, 200-ng/mL, and 400-ng/mL targeted drug concentrations, respectively). The CV for diluted thrombin time for dabigatran was better overall (ranging from 11.6% to 17.2%, 9.3% to 12.3, and 7.1% to 11.2% for 100 ng/mL, 200 ng/mL, and 400 ng/mL, respectively). The rivaroxaban-calibrated anti-Xa assay CVs also showed variability (ranging from 11.5% to 22.2%, 7.2% to 10.9%, and 6.4% to 8.1% for 50-ng/mL, 200-ng/mL, and 400-ng/mL targeted drug concentrations, respectively). The prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) showed variable dose and reagent-dependent responsiveness to DOACs: PT was more responsive to rivaroxaban and aPTT to dabigatran. The undiluted thrombin time showed maximum prolongation across all 3 dabigatran concentrations, making it too sensitive for drug-level monitoring, but supporting its use as a qualitative screening assay.

CONCLUSIONS.—

DOAC-specific assays performed reasonably well. While PT and aPTT cannot be used safely to determine DOAC degree of anticoagulation, a normal thrombin time excludes the presence of dabigatran.

Risk Factors for Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation on Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention

[Figure: see text].

Long-Term Anticoagulation in Secondary Ischemic Stroke Prevention: The Prospective Multicenter RESTAIC Registry

Background and Objective: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) for secondary stroke prevention is recommended in atrial fibrillation (AF) and other sources of cardioembolic stroke. Our objectives were to explore the differences in ischemic and hemorrhagic events when using OAC for secondary stroke prevention according to the type of anticoagulant treatment and to analyze the number and reasons for OAC switches during long-term follow-up.

Methods: Ischemic stroke (IS) patients who were discharged on OAC for secondary stroke prevention from January 2014 to October 2017 were recruited in a prospective, multicenter, hospital-based registry. Follow-up at 3 months was scheduled at the outpatient clinic with subsequent annual phone interviews for 3 years. Patients were classified into three study groups according to OAC at discharge: Vitamin K antagonist (VKA), Factor Xa inhibitor (FXa), or direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI). We compared stroke recurrences, intracranial hemorrhage, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality during the follow-up. We recorded any switches in OAC and the main reasons for the change.

Results: A total of 241 patients were included. An anticoagulant was indicated in the presence of a source of cardioembolic stroke in 240 patients (99.6%) and lupus plus antiphospholipid syndrome in one patient. Up to 86 patients (35.6%) were on OAC before the index stroke; in 71 (82.5%) of them, this was VKA. At hospital discharge, 105 were treated with FXa (43.8%), 96 with VKA (39.6%), and 40 with DTI (16.6%). The cumulative incidences at 3 years were 17% for stroke recurrence, 1.6% for intracranial hemorrhage, 4.9% for major hemorrhage, and 22.8% for all-cause mortality, with no differences among the OAC groups in any outcomes. During the follow-up, 40 OAC switches were recorded (63% of them to FXa), mostly due to stroke recurrence.

Conclusion: Long-term OAC in secondary stroke prevention is associated with a lower frequency of bleeding complications than stroke recurrences. No differences between anticoagulant drugs were found in any of the analyzed outcomes. The main cause for OAC switch during follow-up was stroke recurrence.

Predictors of Bleeding in the Perioperative Anticoagulant Use for Surgery Evaluation Study

Background

In the PAUSE (Perioperative Anticoagulant Use for Surgery Evaluation) Study, a simple, standardized, perioperative interruption strategy was provided for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Our objective was to define the factors associated with perioperative bleeding.

Methods and Results

We analyzed bleeding as the composite of major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. Putative predictors of bleeding, and preoperative DOAC level were prospectively collected during recruitment. We used stratified logistic regression models for analysis. All statistical analyses were performed in R version 3.6.0. There were 3007 patients requiring perioperative DOAC interruption. More than one third of the included patients underwent a high bleeding risk procedure. The 30‐day rates of major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding were 3.02% in apixaban (n=1257), 2.84% in dabigatran (n=668), and 4.16% for rivaroxaban (n=1082). Multivariate analysis stratified by region found more bleeding for hypertension (odds ratio [OR], 1.79; 95% CI 1.07‐2.99; P=0.027), and prior bleeding (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.08‐2.71; P=0.021). Surgical bleed risk classification (high‐ versus low‐risk) as a predictor of bleeding was only significant in the univariate analysis. The prediction model for major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding had an area under the curve of 0.71, and the preoperative DOAC level did not improve the area under the curve of the model.

Conclusions

In patients treated with DOACs who required an elective surgery/procedure and were managed with standardized DOAC interruption and resumption, there we did not find reversible risk factors for bleeding, suggesting that adjustment of the PAUSE management protocol to mitigate against bleeding is not needed.

Analytical verification and comparison of chromogenic assays for dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban determination on BCSXP and STA Compact Max analysers

Introduction

The aim of the study was to perform analytical verification and comparison of chromogenic assays for determination of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban concentration on BCSXP and STA Compact Max analysers.

Materials and methods

Precision, linearity, measurement uncertainty estimation and determination of limit of blank, limit of determination and limit of quantification were calculated. Analytical performance specifications were set according to manufacturer specifications and literature data on between laboratory variability. Comparison of the methods was done using Bland-Altman and Passing-Bablok regression analysis.

Results

Obtained results have shown acceptable precision on STA Compact Max only for dabigatran (CV = 3.5%) at lower concentration level comparing to manufacturer declaration (CV = 3.6%). On BCSXP, the highest coefficient of variation has been shown for apixaban (6.1%) at lower concentration level. Within laboratory precision was not met on STA Compact Max for all assays. Bland-Altman analysis has shown statistically significant bias for dabigatran (23.2%, 95%CI 11.2 - 35.3; P < 0.001) and apixaban (8.4%, 95%CI 1.2 - 15.6; P = 0.023). Passing-Bablok regression analysis has shown systematic and proportional deviation between methods for rivaroxaban (y = 6.52 (2.94 to 11.83) + 0.84 (0.80 to 0.89) x.

Conclusion

Chromogenic assays for dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban on BCSXP and STA Compact Max analysers are shown as methods with satisfactory long-term analytical performance specifications for determination of direct oral anticoagulants in clinical laboratories. However, we cannot recommend interchangeable use because of the significant bias between assays.

International Normalized Ratio as a Screening Test for Assessment of Anticoagulant Activity for Patients Treated With Rivaroxaban or Apixaban: A Pilot Study

Introduction: In patients treated with direct oral anti activated factor X (anti-FXa) anticoagulants such as apixaban and rivaroxaban, there are several emergency and non-emergency conditions in which anticoagulation activity should be measured. The validity of the common global clotting tests, prothrombin time and international normalized ratio (PT/INR) for determination of blood levels of these drugs, has been widely investigated. As the anticoagulation activity evaluation “calibrated anti-FXa” of these drugs is relatively more expensive and less available, we aimed to build a prediction model for anticoagulation activity assessment based on INR values.

Methods and Findings: One hundred sixty samples from 80 hospitalized patients treated with apixaban or rivaroxaban were tested using PT/INR and Anti-FXa chromogenic assay. Two blood samples, trough and peak, were collected from each subject. Participants were randomly divided into two equal groups. One group (n = 40) was used to build the model, which was validated by the second group (n = 40). There was a strong correlation between anti-FXa concentrations and INR in rivaroxaban treated patients (r = 0.899, p < 0.001). Therefore, we were able to build a formula for rivaroxaban patient group which reliably represent the relationship between these two parameters. The correlation in apixaban treated patients was less predictive (r = 0.798, p < 0.001) and the formula suggested could not be validated.

Conclusions: In our study, we developed a formula that estimates the anticoagulant activity of rivaroxaban by obtaining INR values. Where anti-FXa assay is unavailable, our proposed formula may be considered as a screening test for rivaroxaban.

Causes and Risk Factors of Cerebral Ischemic Events in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Treated With Non–Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention

Background and Purpose—

Despite treatment with oral anticoagulants, patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) may experience ischemic cerebrovascular events. The aims of this case-control study in patients with AF were to identify the pathogenesis of and the risk factors for cerebrovascular ischemic events occurring during non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) therapy for stroke prevention.

Methods—

Cases were consecutive patients with AF who had acute cerebrovascular ischemic events during NOAC treatment. Controls were consecutive patients with AF who did not have cerebrovascular events during NOACs treatment.

Results—

Overall, 713 cases (641 ischemic strokes and 72 transient ischemic attacks; median age, 80.0 years; interquartile range, 12; median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale on admission, 6.0; interquartile range, 10) and 700 controls (median age, 72.0 years; interquartile range, 8) were included in the study. Recurrent stroke was classified as cardioembolic in 455 cases (63.9%) according to the A-S-C-O-D (A, atherosclerosis; S, small vessel disease; C, cardiac pathology; O, other causes; D, dissection) classification. On multivariable analysis, off-label low dose of NOACs (odds ratio [OR], 3.18; 95% CI, 1.95–5.85), atrial enlargement (OR, 6.64; 95% CI, 4.63–9.52), hyperlipidemia (OR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.83–3.16), and CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score (OR, 1.72 for each point increase; 95% CI, 1.58–1.88) were associated with ischemic events. Among the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc components, age was older and presence of diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, and history of stroke or transient ischemic attack more common in patients who had acute cerebrovascular ischemic events. Paroxysmal AF was inversely associated with ischemic events (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.33–0.61).

Conclusions—

In patients with AF treated with NOACs who had a cerebrovascular event, mostly but not exclusively of cardioembolic pathogenesis, off-label low dose, atrial enlargement, hyperlipidemia, and high CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score were associated with increased risk of cerebrovascular events.

Clinical standards for patient blood management and perioperative hemostasis and coagulation management. Position Paper of the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI)

Patient blood management is currently defined as the application of evidence based medical and surgical concepts designed to maintain hemoglobin (Hb), optimize hemostasis and minimize blood loss to improve patient outcome. Blood management focus on the perioperative management of patients undergoing surgery or other invasive procedures in which significant blood loss occurs or is expected. Preventive strategies are emphasized to identify and manage anemia, reduce iatrogenic blood losses, optimize hemostasis (e.g. pharmacologic therapy, and point of care testing); establish decision thresholds for the appropriate administration of blood therapy. This goal was motivated historically by known blood risks including transmissible infectious disease, transfusion reactions, and potential effects of immunomodulation. Patient blood management has been recognized by the World Health Organization (WHO) as the new standard of care and has urged all 193-member countries of WHO to implement this concept. There is a pressing need for this new "standard of care" so as to reduce blood transfusion and promote the availability of transfusion alternatives. Patient blood management therefore encompasses an evidence-based medical and surgical approach that is multidisciplinary (transfusion medicine specialists, surgeons, anesthesiologists, and critical care specialists) and multiprofessional (physicians, nurses, pump technologists and pharmacists). The Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI) organized a consensus project involving a Task Force of expert anesthesiologists that reviewing literature provide appropriate levels of care and good clinical practices. Hence, this article focuses on achieving goals of PBM in the perioperative period.

Factors That Determine the Prothrombin Time in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Receiving Rivaroxaban

Rivaroxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor, is widely used to reduce the chance of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). It is not clear why the prothrombin time (PT) of the international normalized ratio (INR) fails to correlate with treatment using rivaroxaban in patients with AF. In this study, patient characteristics, the rivaroxaban dosage, AF type, drug history, biochemical properties, and hematological profiles were assessed in patients treated with rivaroxaban. In 69 patients with AF receiving rivaroxaban, 27 (39.1%) patients had a normal INR (≤1.1, group 1), 27 (39.1%) patients had a slightly prolonged INR (1.1∼1.5, group 2), and 15 (21.7%) patients had a significantly prolonged INR (>1.5, group 3). Group 1 patients had a higher incidence of a stroke history than did patients in group 2 (P = .026) and group 3 (P = .032). We scored patients with a persistent AF pattern (1 point), paroxysmal AF pattern (0 point), renal function (ie, the creatinine clearance rate in mL/min/1.73 m² of >60 as 0 points, of 30∼60 as 1 point, and of <30 as 2 points), and no history of stroke (1 point), and we found that group 3 had a higher score than groups 2 or 1 (2.9 ± 0.8, 2.4 ± 0.7, and 2 ± 0.7, respectively; P < .05). There were similar incidences of bleeding, stroke, and unexpected hospitalizations among the 3 groups. The PT of the INR is determined by multiple variables in patients with AF receiving rivaroxaban. Rivaroxaban-treated patients with AF having different INR values may have similar clinical outcomes.

Testing and monitoring direct oral anticoagulants

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have significantly improved the care of patients requiring anticoagulation. With similar or better efficacy and safety outcomes and easier use in the outpatient setting compared with the standard-of-care vitamin K antagonists and low molecular weight heparin, DOACs are now endorsed as first-line treatment of indications including prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and treatment of venous thromboembolism. DOACs are easy-to-use oral agents that offer simple dosing and short half-lives, with no need to test levels because of the wide therapeutic window and limited drug-drug interactions. After almost a decade of DOAC use, the question of testing DOAC levels in certain clinical situations has become the focus of debate. Although guidance for using routine coagulation tests is available, these tests are inadequate for optimal care. DOAC-specific tests have been developed but have limited availability in Europe and less availability in the United States. None are licensed. DOAC testing may be useful in the setting of critical clinical situations such as life-threatening bleeding or need for emergent surgery, especially with the availability of DOAC reversal agents. Patients with characteristics that fall outside the normal range may benefit from the guidance that DOAC testing could offer. Obstacles to adopting DOAC testing have been raised, such as test reliability and staffing costs; however, these problems are rapidly being resolved. Further investigation of the role of DOAC testing is needed to explore its full potential and role in clinical practice.

The vexed question of whether or not to measure levels of direct oral anticoagulants before surgery or invasive procedures

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) possess high bioavailability, and their anticoagulant effect is more predictable than that of vitamin K antagonists, hence they do not require routine dose adjustment based on laboratory testing. However, there are circumstances when laboratory testing may be useful, including patients who need to undergo surgery or invasive procedures. Most guidelines state that patients on DOAC may safely undergo surgery/invasive procedures by stopping anticoagulation for a few days before intervention without testing if renal function is within normal limits. This review article discusses the pros and cons of measuring (or not measuring) DOAC levels before surgery/invasive procedures by a multidisciplinary team of experts with different background, including the thrombosis laboratory, clinical thrombosis, internal medicine, cardiology and nephrology. The conclusion is that measuring DOAC with dedicated tests before surgical or invasive procedures is important for patient safety. It provides the best and most direct evidence to rule in (or to rule out) clinically relevant concentrations of residual drugs. Regulatory agencies should urgently approve their use in clinical practice. Hospital administrators should make them available, and clinical laboratories should set up the relative methods and make them available to clinicians.