Pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, safety, and preliminary efficacy of subcutaneous turoctocog alfa pegol in previously treated patients with severe hemophilia A (alleviate 1)

A bispecific antibody NXT007 exerts a hemostatic activity in hemophilia A monkeys enough to keep a nonhemophilic state

BACKGROUND

Emicizumab, a factor (F) VIIIa-function mimetic bispecific antibody (BsAb) to FIXa and FX, has become an indispensable treatment option for people with hemophilia A (PwHA). However, a small proportion of PwHA still experience bleeds even under emicizumab prophylaxis, as observed in the long-term outcomes of clinical studies. A more potent BsAb may be desirable for such patients.

OBJECTIVES

To identify a potent BsAb to FIXa and FX, NXT007, surpassing emicizumab by in vitro and in vivo evaluation.

METHODS

New pairs of light chains for emicizumab's heavy chains were screened from phage libraries, and subsequent antibody optimization was performed. For in vitro evaluation, thrombin generation assays were performed with hemophilia A plasma. In vivo hemostatic activity was evaluated in a nonhuman primate model of acquired hemophilia A.

RESULTS

NXT007 exhibited an in vitro thrombin generation activity comparable to the international standard activity of FVIII (100 IU/dL), much higher than emicizumab, when triggered by tissue factor. NXT007 also demonstrated a potent in vivo hemostatic activity at approximately 30-fold lower plasma concentrations than emicizumab's historical data. In terms of dose shift between NXT007 and emicizumab, the in vitro and in vivo results were concordant. Regarding pharmacokinetics, NXT007 showed lower in vivo clearance than those shown by typical monoclonal antibodies, suggesting that the Fc engineering to enhance FcRn binding worked well.

CONCLUSION

NXT007, a potent BsAb, was successfully created. Nonclinical results suggest that NXT007 would have a potential to keep a nonhemophilic range of coagulation potential in PwHA or to realize more convenient dosing regimens than emicizumab.

Shifting Paradigms and Arising Concerns in Severe Hemophilia A Treatment

The management of hemophilia A has undergone a remarkable revolution, in line with technological advancement. In the recent past, the primary concern associated with Factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates was the risk of infections, which is now almost resolved by advanced blood screening and viral inactivation methods. Improving patients' compliance with prophylaxis has become a key focus, as it can lead to improved health outcomes and reduced health care costs in the long term. Recent bioengineering research is directed toward prolonging the recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) coagulant activity and synthesising higher FVIII yields. As an outcome, B-domain deleted, polyethylene glycolated, single-chain, Fc-fused rFVIII, and rFVIIIFc-von Willebrand Factor-XTEN are available for patients. Moreover, emicizumab, a bispecific antibody, is commercially available, whereas fitusiran and tissue factor pathway inhibitor are in clinical trial stages as alternative strategies for patients with inhibitors. With these advancements, noninfectious complications, such as inhibitor development, allergic reactions, and thrombosis, are emerging concerns requiring careful management. In addition, the recent approval of gene therapy is a major milestone toward a permanent cure for hemophilia A. The vast array of treatment options at our disposal today empowers patients and providers alike, to tailor therapeutic regimens to the unique needs of each individual. Despite significant progress in modern treatment options, these highly effective therapies are markedly more expensive than conventional replacement therapy, limiting their access for patients in developing countries.

Safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of a subcutaneous recombinant FVIII (OCTA101) in adult patients with severe haemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

Regular, prophylactic intravenous (i.v.) FVIII can be challenging for some patients with haemophilia A. Subcutaneous (s.c.) FVIII administration could provide an alternative treatment option with greater convenience and without the complications associated with venous access.

AIM

To assess the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), bioavailability and efficacy of s.c. OCTA101, a recombinant FVIII with a recombinant von Willebrand factor fragment dimer.

METHODS

This was a single-centre, prospective, open-label, phase I/II study (NCT04046848). Previously treated male patients (≥18 years) with severe haemophilia A were eligible for the study. The primary objective of the study was to assess the safety (including immunogenicity) of OCTA101. Secondary objectives included assessments of PK, bioavailability, and the efficacy of prophylaxis.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were treated with OCTA101. FVIII inhibitors developed in five (16.7%) patients during daily prophylaxis with 40-60 IU/kg (three cases) and 12.5 IU/kg (two cases) OCTA101. The trial was therefore terminated. OCTA101 had a 2.5-fold longer terminal half-life compared with i.v. rFVIII, and bioavailability was 16.6%. Efficacy data at study termination indicated that daily prophylaxis with 40-60 IU/kg OCTA101 was efficacious in the absence of FVIII inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite promising PK and efficacy results, the trial was terminated due to the incidence of FVIII inhibitors. The occurrence of inhibitors at two dose levels suggests that their development may be related to the subcutaneous route of administration.

Factor IX administration in the skin primes inhibitor formation and sensitizes hemophilia B mice to systemic factor IX administration

Background

Factor IX inhibitor formation is the most serious complication of replacement therapy for the bleeding disorder hemophilia B, exacerbated by severe allergic reactions occurring in up to 60% of patients with inhibitors. Low success rates of immune tolerance induction therapy in hemophilia B necessitate the search for novel immune tolerance therapies. Skin-associated lymphoid tissues have been successfully targeted in allergen-specific immunotherapy.

Objectives

We aimed to develop a prophylactic immune tolerance protocol based on intradermal administration of FIX that would prevent inhibitor formation and/or anaphylaxis in response to replacement therapy.

Methods

We measured FIX inhibitor, anti-FIX immunoglobulin G1, and immunoglobulin E titers using the Bethesda assay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay after 4 weeks of twice-weekly intradermal FIX or FIX-Fc administration followed by 5 to 6 weeks of weekly systemic FIX injections in C3H/HeJ hemophilia B mice. We also measured skin antigen-presenting, follicular helper T, and germinal center B cell frequencies in skin-draining lymph nodes after a single or repeat intradermal FIX administration.

Results

Intradermal administration enhanced FIX inhibitor formation in response to systemic administration. We further found that intradermal administration alone triggers inhibitor formation, even at a low dose of 0.4 IU/kg, which is 100-fold lower than the intravenous dose of 40 IU/kg typically required to induce inhibitor development in hemophilia B mice. Also, intradermal administration triggered germinal center formation in skin-draining lymph nodes and sensitized mice to systemic administration. Factor IX-Fc fusion protein did not modulate inhibitor formation.

Conclusion

Intradermal FIX administration is highly immunogenic, suggesting that the skin compartment is not amenable to immune tolerance induction or therapeutic delivery of clotting factors.

New directions to develop therapies for people with hemophilia

INTRODUCTION

The past few decades have seen a tremendous advancement in the management of hemophilia. Whether it is improved methods to attenuate critical viruses, recombinant bioengineering with decreased immunogenicity, extended half-life replacement therapies to mitigate the burden of repeated infusion treatments, novel nonreplacement products to avoid the drawback of inhibitor development with its attractive subcutaneous administration and then the introduction of gene therapy, the management has trodden a long way.

AREAS COVERED

This expert review describes the progress in the treatment of hemophilia over the years. We discuss, in detail, the past and current therapies, their benefits, drawbacks, along with relevant studies leading to approval, efficacy and safety profile, ongoing trials, and future prospects.

EXPERT OPINION

The technological advances in the treatment of hemophilia with convenient modes of administration and innovative modalities offer a chance for a normal existence of the patients living with this disease. However, it is imperative for clinicians to be aware of the potential adverse effects and the need for further studies to establish causality or chance association of these events with novel agents. Thus, it is crucial for clinicians to engage patients and their families in informed decision-making and tailor individual concerns and necessities.

Understanding treatment burden in hemophilia: development and validation of the Hemophilia Treatment Experience Measure (Hemo-TEM)

BACKGROUND

To capture the broad range of treatment burden issues experienced by adolescent and adult people with hemophilia (PWH), the Hemophilia Treatment Experience Measure (Hemo-TEM) was developed. We describe the development of this new hemophilia-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure including concept elicitation, cognitive debriefing, and psychometric validation.

RESULTS

Concept elicitation interviews were conducted with 5 clinical experts and 30 adult PWH in the United States (US). The qualitative analysis of these interviews and a review of the literature informed the PRO measure development. The project team reviewed concept endorsement rates and generated a 27-item preliminary version of the Hemo-TEM. Cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted to ensure participant understanding and item relevance in samples of (adolescent (n = 20) and adult (n = 14)) PWH in the US. The refined, validation-ready version of the Hemo-TEM included 30 items. Lastly, data from 3 clinical trials comprised the 4 analysis sets used for the psychometric validation with a sample size of N = 88. Item reduction dropped 4 items resulting in a final 26-item measure. Factor analysis generated 5 domains in the Hemo-TEM [injection difficulties (3 items), physical impact (6 items), treatment bother (7 items), interference with daily life (4 items), and emotional impact (6 items)] and a total score. All scores were reliable [internally consistent (0.84-0.88)]. For convergent validity, with the exception of one domain, all hypothesized associations were met. Preliminary sensitivity to change effect sizes were between - 0.30 and - 0.70. Meaningful change thresholds ranged from 6 points (physical impact and emotional impact) to 10 points (treatment bother) with 8 points for the Hemo-TEM total score.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from the concept elicitation, cognitive debriefing, and psychometric validation phases provide evidence that the Hemo-TEM is a well-designed, valid, and reliable measure of the burden of hemophilia treatment, including treatment impact on adolescent and adult PWH.

PEGylated drug delivery systems in the pharmaceutical field: past, present and future perspective

Target-site drug delivery systems are gaining interest in the pharmaceutical field due to their great advantages, such as higher drug dosing capacity and better bioavailability. However, some existing problems need to be overcome. As an example, interaction between blood proteins and drug delivery systems. A potent candidate to approach the mentioned problem is based on polyethylene glycol (PEG) surface modifications. This polymer acts as a protector towards the external possible interactions with other compounds, making targeted delivery possible. Diseases such as cancer, diabetes, haemophilia and pain treatment can benefit from these new systems.This review aims to give an overview of drug delivery systems based on PEGylation as surface modification as pharmaceutical approach. Moreover, a deeper insight of the properties of PEG and its advantages is given, as well as brief overview of present therapies based on this technology.

Clinical Utility of Subcutaneous Factor VIII Replacement Therapies in Hemophilia A: A Review of the Evidence

Hemophilia therapies have tremendously improved over the last decades with the development of prolonged half-life factor VIII (FVIII) and FIX concentrates, non-factor therapies, such as emicizumab, anti-TFPI antibodies or siRNA antithrombin and gene therapy. All of these new molecules significantly reduced the burden of the disease and improved the quality of life of patients with severe hemophilia. Emicizumab, a non-factor therapy, is currently the only subcutaneous molecule available for prophylactic treatment of severe hemophilia A. Because of the subcutaneous route of delivery and similar efficacy to FVIII replacement therapy, emicizumab has been rapidly adopted by patients and their families. This clinical observation emphasizes the relevance and need for the development of subcutaneous FVIII concentrates. Here, we report evidence-based advantages and interest in the subcutaneous route of administration for the treatment of hemophilia A and review the stages of development of the different subcutaneous FVIII molecules.

Advances in the management of haemophilia: emerging treatments and their mechanisms

Mainstay haemophilia treatment, namely intravenous factor replacement, poses several clinical challenges including frequent injections due to the short half-life of recombinant factors, intravenous administration (which is particularly challenging in those with difficult venous access), and the risk of inhibitor development. These impact negatively upon quality of life and treatment compliance, highlighting the need for improved therapies. Several novel pharmacological therapies developed for haemophilia aim to rebalance the clotting cascade and potentially circumvent the aforementioned challenges. These therapies utilise a range of different mechanisms, namely: the extension of the circulating half-life of standard recombinant factors; the mimicking of factor VIII cofactor activity; rebalancing of coagulation through targeting of natural anticoagulants such as antithrombin and tissue factor pathway inhibitor; and inducing the production of endogenous factors with gene therapy. These therapies carry the potential of revolutionising haemophilia treatment by alleviating the current challenges presented by mainstay factor replacement. This review will provide an overview of the key trial findings related to novel therapies based on the mechanisms described above.

Redefining prophylaxis in the modern era

Prophylaxis is the globally accepted standard of care for persons with haemophilia and presents many advantages over episodic treatment. The prophylaxis benefits include bleed reduction, reduction in musculoskeletal complications and improvement in the quality of life. The currently evolving novel therapies for the management of haemophilia has ushered a new era characterized by improved prophylaxis targets and outcomes. These redefined targets and outcomes have necessitated the need to also redefine prophylaxis. In this state-of-the-art review, we redefine prophylaxis in the modern era by revisiting its definition, presenting data to support higher trough levels to achieve with prophylaxis and introducing steady-state haemostasis as a possible new target for prophylaxis.

2021 clinical trials update: Innovations in hemophilia therapy

Therapies engineered to prolong clotting factor protein circulation time, manipulate the balance of pro-coagulant and anti-coagulant proteins, or introduce new genetic material to enable endogenous factor protein production dominate the clinical trial landscape of hemophilia. The availability of clotting factor concentrates and the establishment of primary prophylaxis have dramatically improved health outcomes for hemophilia patients. But, the burden of hemostatic therapy remains significant, and many barriers to consistent longitudinal use of prophylaxis exist. Several types of emerging therapeutics including engineered factor concentrates, substitutive therapies, rebalancing therapies, and gene transfer/editing all aim to reduce the challenges of current hemophilia treatment. Emerging treatment options may reduce treatment frequency or need for intravenous administration. They may also introduce new challenges in laboratory assessment of hemostasis. These novel therapies must not introduce significant new health risks and continue to support similar or improved outcomes. The potential ramifications of rebalancing the coagulation cascade, particularly in a stress or inflammatory state, or introduction of new genetic material are not trivial. The focus of this review is to provide an overview of active and recently completed clinical trials as well as emerging preclinical data investigating new therapeutic possibilities for hemophilia patients and potentially other rare bleeding disorders.

Pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, safety, and preliminary efficacy of subcutaneous turoctocog alfa pegol in previously treated patients with severe hemophilia A (alleviate 1)

BACKGROUND

The current standard of care for patients with hemophilia A is regular prophylaxis with factor VIII (FVIII) administered intravenously. Interest in subcutaneous (s.c.) administration, to potentially increase convenience, reduce the treatment burden and improve compliance, is increasing.

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK), immunogenicity, safety, and preliminary efficacy of s.c. administration of turoctocog alfa pegol (s.c. N8-GP) in adult or adolescent previously treated patients (PTPs) with severe hemophilia A (alleviate 1; NCT02994407).

PATIENTS/METHODS

In part A, 24 PTPs received a single dose of s.c. N8-GP (12.5, 25, 50, or 100 IU/kg) with 6 patients per cohort. PK modelling of data from part A supported a suitable dose for part B. Part B comprised a multiple dose trial in 26 PTPs; patients <60 kg received 2000 IU and patients ≥60 kg received 4000 IU s.c. N8-GP daily for 3 months.

RESULTS

Single-dose s.c. N8-GP supported dose linearity. Daily prophylaxis with s.c. N8-GP appeared well tolerated and efficacious, achieving a mean trough FVIII activity close to 10% at steady state. Five patients developed anti-N8-GP binding antibodies after 42 to 91 exposure days, one of whom developed an inhibitor to FVIII. Anti-N8-GP antibody appearance was associated with a decline in FVIII plasma activity in four of the five patients. Five patients reported a total of nine treatment-requiring bleeding episodes during prophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

Subcutaneous administration of N8-GP is associated with a high incidence of antibodies in PTPs with severe hemophilia A. Further clinical development of s.c. N8-GP has been suspended.