Clinical noninvasive markers for antiviral therapy decision in chronic hepatitis B with alanine aminotransferase less than two times upper limit of normal

Development and Validation of a Non-invasive Model to Predict Liver Histological Lesions in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients With Persistently Normal Alanine Aminotransferase and Detectable Viremia

Background

A critical and controversial issue is whether antiviral therapy should be recommended in chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection patients with persistently normal alanine aminotransferase (PNALT) and detectable HBV DNA. The study aimed to develop a non-invasive model for predicting significant liver histological changes (SLHC), which is the histological indication for antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with PNALT and detectable HBV DNA.

Methods

398 chronic HBV infection patients with PNALT and detectable HBV DNA who underwent liver biopsy were divided into the estimation set (n = 256) and validation set (n = 142). A multivariate logistic regression model was developed to predict SLHC in the estimation set, and the diagnostic performance was further validated in the validation set.

Results

132 patients (33.2%) with PNALT and detectable HBV DNA had SLHC. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), cholinesterase (ChE), and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) were identified as the independent predictors of SLHC. The AUROC of the SLHC index, which combined AST, ChE, and LSM, was 0.824 and 0.816 in the estimation and validation set, respectively, for the prediction of SLHC. Applying the SLHC index ≤ 0.15, the presence of SLHC could be excluded with high negative predictive value in the estimation set (93.2%) and in the validation set (90.2%). Applying the SLHC index ≥ 0.55, the presence of SLHC could be considered with high positive predictive value in the estimation set (79.2%) and in the validation set (76.5%).

Conclusion

The SLHC index provides a high accuracy in predicting liver histological indication for antiviral therapy in CHB patients with PNALT and detectable HBV DNA.

Dose-response relationship between qAnti-HBc and liver inflammation in chronic hepatitis B with normal or mildly elevated ALT based on liver biopsy

BACKGROUND

The proportion of chronic hepatitis B(CHB) patients with normal or mildly elevated ALT(NMALT) levels who have moderate to severe inflammation was not rare. However, we lacked appropriate biomarkers to evaluate liver inflammation in these populations. We aimed to explore the relationship between quantitative hepatitis B core antibody(qAnti-HBc) and hepatic histological inflammation.

METHOD

This multi-center cohort study enrolled participants from 34 Chinese hospital including 1376 treatment-naive CHB patients with liver biopsy(934 with NMALT entered treatment-naive cohort; 423 with secondary liver biopsy entered treatment cohort). Using unadjusted and multivariate-adjusted generalized linear models, generalized additive models with smooth curve fitting, we evaluated the associations between qAnti-HBc and liver inflammation in these patients.

RESULTS

In the treatment-naive patients, qAnti-HBc was positively associated with liver inflammation(histology activity index[HAI] evaluated by Ishak scoring system)(fully-adjusted model: β=0.48, 95%CI[0.30-0.66], P<0.001). For per-SD increase in qAnti-HBc, the risk of moderate to severe inflammation(HAI≥5) increased by 56%(OR=1.56, 95%CI[1.28-1.91], P<0.001). The curve fitting indicated a significant "threshold effect" (inflection point was 4.5 log₁₀ IU/mL, P<0.001). Subgroup analyses and interactions were not significant(all P>0.05). In the treatment patients, there was no significant correlation between qAnti-HBc and liver inflammation, whether based on unadjusted, minimally-adjusted, or fully-adjusted models(all P>0.100). Paired analyses showed a significant correlation between decreasing in qAnti-HBc and alleviation of liver inflammation.

CONCLUSIONS

qAnti-HBc was positively correlated with liver inflammation in treatment-naive CHB patients with NMALT. The cutoff value of qAnti-HBc for the diagnosis of moderate to severe inflammation was 4.5 log₁₀ IU/mL. Decreasing in qAnti-HBc was positively correlated with liver inflammation relieving. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

A new model based on gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase to platelet ratio (GPR) predicts prognostic outcome after curative resection of solitary hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study intends to explore the potential clinical value of gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase to platelet ratio (GPR) and the new multi-factor scoring model for recurrence and prognosis prediction in solitary HCC patients who received radical resection.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed 295 HCC patients after curative resection. According to the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, the optimal cut-off value of GPR for predicting prognosis of HCC after resection was determined. The Kaplan Meier method and Cox regression analysis were performed to assess the important potential factors in the prognosis of HCC and determine the independent risk factors. Assign a value to each independent risk factor and establish a new scoring model. Then, using GPR and the new scoring model to evaluate overall survival (OS) and postoperative recurrence probability.

RESULTS

When GPR's cut-off value was selected as 0.30, its predictive efficiency for postoperative prognosis was more favorable than those of other cut-off values (0.76, 0.84 and 0.94). GPR, tumor size, microvascular invasion and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were identified as independent prognostic predictors. Using these variables, a novel prognostic scoring model was devised and established to identify different levels of risk: high, intermediate and low risk groups. We found that patients with high GPR level and of high risk group would have a poorer OS and a higher recurrence rate after radical resection.

CONCLUSIONS

GPR may serve as a promising predictor for postoperative prognosis and recurrence probability of HCC, and the new prognostic scoring model may be available for postoperative management among HCC patients.

Significant histological changes and satisfying antiviral efficacy in chronic hepatitis B virus infection patients with normal alanine aminotransferase. Antiviral therapy decision in chronic HBV patients with normal ALT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

A proportion of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection patients with normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) should start antiviral therapy based on liver biopsy. We aim to evaluate the proportion of such patients, find noninvasive methods for identifying and then evaluate antiviral efficacy.

METHODS

253 chronic HBV infection patients with normal ALT were analyzed at baseline and 57 patients with histological indication for antiviral therapy (Histology activity index ≥5 and/or Ishak fibrosis score ≥3) and 140 patients with elevated ALT received entecavir therapy and were followed-up to 78 weeks with a second liver biopsy in this multi-center study.

RESULTS

127 (50.2%) of 253 patients with normal ALT fulfilled histological indication for antiviral therapy. Aspartate aminotransferase (P=0.049), anti-hepatitis B virus core antibody (P=0.001) and liver stiffness measurement (P=0.000) were independent variables for identifying histological indication for antiviral therapy. A noninvasive model (AAF) performed best among independent variables and other noninvasive models with area under the operating characteristic curve of 0.887. Antiviral efficacy showed that 38 (66.7%) of 57 patients had undetectable HBV DNA. 12 (41.4%) of 29 patients who were hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive at baseline achieved HBeAg loss and 3 (10.3%) achieved HBeAg seroconversion. 25 (43.9%) of 57 patients achieved histological response. Moreover, 57 patients with normal ALT had a similar antiviral therapy efficacy with 140 patients with elevated ALT (P>0.1) except proportion of inflammation improvement and histological response (P=0.005, P=0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

Half of chronic HBV patients with normal ALT should start antiviral therapy based on liver biopsy. A noninvasive model could be used as a reliable tool for antiviral therapy decision. Patients with normal or elevated ALT had a similar antiviral efficacy.

A noninvasive model to predict liver histology for antiviral therapy decision in chronic hepatitis B with alanine aminotransferase < 2 upper limit of normal

Background

At present, most assessments of liver fibrosis staging mainly focus on non-invasive diagnostic methods. This study aims to construct a noninvasive model to predict liver histology for antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) < 2 times upper limit of normal (ULN).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 577 patients with CHB who received liver biopsy and whose ALT was less than 2 ULN. Then they were randomly divided into a training group and a validation group. Through logistic regression analysis, a novel predictive model was constructed in the training group to predict significant changes in liver histology [necro-inflammatory activity grade (G) ≥ 2 or fibrosis stage (S) ≥ 2] and then validated in the validation group.

Results

If liver biopsy showed moderate or severe inflammation or significant fibrosis, antiviral treatment was recommended. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), anti-hepatitis B virus core antibody (anti-HBC) and glutamine transpeptidase (GGT) were identified as independent predictors for antiviral therapy, with area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of 0.649, 0.647 and 0.616, respectively. Our novel model index, which combined AST, anti- HBC and GGT with AUROC of 0.700 and 0.742 in training set and validation set.

Conclusions

This study established a noninvasive model to predict liver histology for antiviral treatment decision in patients with CHB with ALT < 2 ULN, which can reduce the clinical needs of liver biopsy.

AST and HBeAg Level Can Help to Distinguish Non-Minimal Liver Inflammation in Persistently Normal Alanine Aminotransferase of Chronic HBV Infection

Objectives: The current study aimed to investigate the characteristics of HBV serum markers (HBsAg, HBeAg), biochemical indicators, HBV DNA, and the age to distinguish minimal from non-minimal liver histological inflammation group in HBeAg-positive chronic HBV-infected patients with ALT≤ 1ULN (40U/L). Methods: The HBeAg-positive patients with treatment-naïve hospitalized at Ditan hospital from January 2008 to January 2017 are investigated. Patients were separated into two groups of minimal and non-minimal (mild and moderate) histological inflammation group by liver biopsy specimens. Data were analyzed using the SPSS package. Results: There were both positive (age, ALT, and AST) and negative correlation factors (serum HBsAg, HBeAg, or HBV DNA quantitation) to the liver inflammation grades. Multivariate regression analysis indicated that HBeAg (P < 0.001, b = -0.554, Exp (B) = 0.575) and AST (P = 0.003, b = 0.074, Exp (B) = 1.077) were independent influential factors. The cutoff values of HBeAg and AST were separately 2.85 Log10S/CO (AUC0.724, Sensitivity64%, Specificity79%), 28U/L (AUC0.726, Sensitivity68%, Specificity 78%) to distinguish Minimal from Non-minimal liver histological inflammation in chronic HBV-infected patients with ALT ≤ 1 ULN (40U/L). Conclusions: In total, 31.34% (115/367) of patients with chronic HBV infection who had non-minimal (mild and moderate) liver histological inflammation reached the required inflammation levels for antiviral treatment in HBeAg-positive patients with persistently normal ALT. HBeAg (cutoff < 2.85 Log10S/CO) and AST (cutoff > 28 U/L) were the independent influential factors of predicting non-minimal liver inflammation with ALT ≤ 1 ULN (40U/L).

Assessing significant fibrosis using imaging-based elastography in chronic hepatitis B patients: Pilot study

BACKGROUND

Accurate detection of significant fibrosis (fibrosis stage 2 or higher on the METAVIR scale) is important especially for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with high viral loads but with normal or mildly elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels because the presence of significant fibrosis is accepted as the indication for antiviral treatment. Liver biopsy is the reference standard for diagnosing significant fibrosis, but it is an invasive procedure. Consequently, noninvasive imaging-based measurements, such as magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) or two-dimensional shear-wave elastography (2D-SWE), have been proposed for the quantitative assessment of liver fibrosis.

AIM

To explore MRE and 2D-SWE to identify fibrosis stage, and to compare their performance with that of serum-based indices.

METHODS

The study enrolled 63 treatment-naïve CHB patients with high viral loads but with normal or mildly elevated ALT levels who underwent liver biopsy before a decision was made to initiate antiviral therapy. MRE and 2D-SWE were performed, and serum-based indices, such as FIB-4 and aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index (APRI), were calculated. The diagnostic performances of MRE, 2D-SWE, FIB-4, and APRI for assessing significant fibrosis (≥ F2) and cirrhosis (F4) were evaluated with liver histology as the reference standard, using receiver operating characteristic analyses.

RESULTS

The liver fibrosis stage was F0/F1 in 19, F2 in 14, F3 in 14, and F4 in 16 patients, respectively. MRE significantly discriminated F2 from F0/1 (P = 0.022), whereas 2D-SWE showed a broad overlap in distinguishing those stages. MRE showed a higher correlation coefficient value with fibrosis stage than 2D-SWE with fibrosis stage (0.869 vs 0.649, Spearman test; P < 0.001). Multivariate linear regression analyses showed that fibrosis stage was the only factor affecting the values of MRE (P < 0.001), whereas body mass index (P = 0.042) and fibrosis stage (P < 0.001) were independent factors affecting 2D-SWE values. MRE performance for diagnosing significant fibrosis was better [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.906, positive predictive value (PPV) 97.3%, negative predictive value (NPV) 69.2%] than that of FIB-4 (AUC = 0.697, P = 0.002) and APRI (AUC = 0.717, P = 0.010), whereas the performance of 2D-SWE (AUC = 0.843, PPV 86%, NPV 65%) was not significantly different from that of FIB-4 or APRI.

CONCLUSION

Compared to SWE, MRE might be more precise non-invasive assessment for depicting significant fibrosis and for making-decision to initiate antiviral-therapy in treatment-naïve CHB patients with normal or mildly-elevated ALT levels.