Optimal therapy of chronic hepatitis B: how do I treat HBeAg-positive patients?

Performance of serum HBcrAg in chronic hepatitis B patients with 8-year nucleos(t)ide analogs therapy

AIM

This study aimed to investigate long-term kinetics of serum hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) and its correlation with serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in a real-world cohort of patients who had received over 8 years of nucleos(t)ide analogs(NAs) therapy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study. All patients were recruited from our previous published study, who started therapy with NAs between 2007 and 2008. Serum HBcrAg and HBsAg levels were quantitatively measured at baseline, the sixth month and each year of follow-up, using the stored serum samples.

RESULTS

Among the 94 patients, serum HBcrAg presented a gradually decreasing trend from baseline to year 8, either in HBeAg-negative or HBeAg-positive patients. After 8 years of NAs treatment, 21.3% of patients achieved serum HBcrAg < 3 log 10 U/mL, and only baseline HBcrAg was an independent predictor. Additionally, good correlation of HBcrAg and HBsAg was observed at baseline, but this correlation weakened remarkably during treatment.

CONCLUSION

Serum HBcrAg is decreasing gradually with the duration of antiviral therapy, and baseline HBcrAg level is an independent predictor of long-term HBcrAg below the limit of detection.

Comparison of hepatitis B virus core-related antigen and hepatitis B surface antigen for predicting HBeAg seroconversion in chronic hepatitis B patients with pegylated interferon therapy

AIM

Recent studies revealed that both quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (qHBsAg) and hepatitis B core-related antigen (qHBcrAg) could serve as a good marker for predicting treatment response and indirectly reflecting intrahepatic cccDNA levels. This study aimed to compare the value of qHBsAg and qHBcrAg in predicting HBeAg seroconversion among patients undergoing PEG-IFN therapy.

METHODS

A total of 31 HBeAg-positive patients, who underwent PEG-IFN therapy for 12 months and follow-up for six months were retrospectively included in this study. The serum qHBsAg level was measured using Elecsys® HBsAg II Quant Assay and serum qHBcrAg level was measured using chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay.

RESULTS

During the 12-month treatment, the absolute levels of serum qHBsAg and qHBcrAg were both lower in patients with HBeAg seroconversion as compared to patients without HBeAg seroconversion, but only the difference in qHBcrAg was significant. During the 6-month follow-up period, both qHBsAg and qHBcrAg levels were rebounded significantly among patients without HBeAg seroconversion. Among patients with HBeAg seroconversion, no sustained significant decline of qHBsAg was observed, but serum qHBcrAg levels continued to decline significantly. The ROC curves analysis showed that both absolute qHBcrAg level and the extent of qHBcrAg decline at month 1 had better performance for the prediction of HBeAg seroconversion at month 6 after treatment, as compared to that of qHBsAg.

CONCLUSION

Early on-treatment qHBcrAg may be a good biomarker for predicting off-treatment HBeAg seroconversion in patients receiving PEG-IFN therapy.

Analysis of epitope-based vaccine candidates against the E antigen of the hepatitis B virus based on the B genotype sequence: An in silico and in vitro approach

Chronic hepatitis B virus infection is a worldwide health problem with no current effective strategy to achieve a cure. The Hepatitis B virus (HBV) E antigen (HBeAg) has a negative effect on the immune system and a therapeutic vaccine is a promising strategy in order to treat chronic virus infection. In this study, we analyzed and identified the MHC-I, MHC-II and B cell epitopes of the HBeAg based on a B genotype sequence of HBV using a bioinformatic approach and in vitro experiments. The computational approach provided us with four epitopes (LLWFHISCL, YLVSFGVWI, MQLFHLCLI, TVLEYLVSF) of the specific MHC-I allele HLA-A0201 that conformed to all criteria. Molecular docking and a peptide binding assay showed that epitope TVLEYLVSF had the lowest binding energy and epitope LLWFHISCL had the highest binding affinity to the HLA-A0201 molecule. An interferonγenzyme-linked immunospot assay and cytotoxicity assay revealed that epitope LLWFHISCL had the highest ability to induce and stimulate T cells. Furthermore, we determined four core peptides of MHC-II epitopes and a region of the B cell epitope. The epitopes and region identified in this research may be helpful in designing epitope-based vaccines and boosting the mechanism research of HBeAg and its effect on the immune system.

Four-year Outcomes After Cessation of Tenofovir in Immune-tolerant Chronic Hepatitis B Patients

GOALS

To study the long-term outcome after cessation of antiviral therapy in immune-tolerant patients.

BACKGROUND

Experience in the treatment of immune-tolerant chronic hepatitis B is scanty. Some immune-tolerant patients may receive temporary antiviral therapy, such as for prevention of vertical transmission at pregnancy or prophylaxis for chemotherapy.

STUDY

This was a follow-up study of a phase 2 trial at 2 centers. Immune-tolerant patients received tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and/or emtricitabine for 4 years and were followed for another 4 years after treatment cessation. Virological relapse was defined as hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA>2000 IU/mL; clinical relapse was defined as HBV DNA>2000 IU/mL; and alanine aminotransferase (ALT)>2 times the upper limit of normal.

RESULTS

In total, 20 patients stopped treatment and were followed up for 206±14 weeks. All patients developed virological relapse at posttreatment week 4 (HBV DNA, 7.07±1.45 log IU/mL). A total of 10 (50%) patients developed clinical relapse at 15±11 weeks (highest ALT, 1149 U/L). In total, 11 (55%) patients were restarted on antiviral therapy; 4 achieved complete HBV DNA suppression and 1 achieved hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion. Among the 9 patients not restarted on therapy, 2 patients had HBeAg seroconversion with normal ALT and HBV DNA of 7.12 and 1.62 IU/mL, respectively. The remaining 7 untreated patients continued to have positive HBeAg, high HBV DNA, and normal ALT.

CONCLUSIONS

Rapid virological relapse is universal and clinical relapse is common after stopping antiviral therapy in patients with immune-tolerant chronic hepatitis B. HBeAg seroconversion is rare regardless of treatment reinitiation.

How viral genetic variants and genotypes influence disease and treatment outcome of chronic hepatitis B. Time for an individualised approach?

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a global problem. Several HBV genotypes exist with different biology and geographical prevalence. Whilst the future aim of HBV treatment remains viral eradication, current treatment strategies aim to suppress the virus and prevent the progression of liver disease. Current strategies also involve identification of patients for treatment, namely those at risk of progressive liver disease. Identification of HBV genotype, HBV mutants and other predictive factors allow for tailoured treatments, and risk-surveillance pathways, such as hepatocellular cancer screening. In the future, these factors may enable stratification not only of treatment decisions, but also of patients at risk of higher relapse rates when current therapies are discontinued. Newer technologies, such as next-generation sequencing, to assess drug-resistant or immune escape variants and quasi-species heterogeneity in patients, may allow for more information-based treatment decisions between the clinician and the patient. This article serves to discuss how HBV genotypes and genetic variants impact not only upon the disease course and outcomes, but also current treatment strategies. Adopting a personalised genotypic approach may play a role in future strategies to combat the disease. Herein, we discuss new technologies that may allow more informed decision-making for response guided therapy in the battle against HBV.

Missed treatment in an Italian HBV infected patients cohort: HBV RER

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Very little is known about the access to treatment for Chronic Hepatitis B in the real clinical practice and the characteristics of the patients who do not receive antiviral therapy.

METHODS

HBV-RER is an observational multicenter network that collected data of patients with HBV infection during a 3 years observational period (2009-2012).

RESULTS

Among 2527 HBsAg positive patients, 1099 were never treated (NT); only 280 were included in the analysis due to different exclusion causes A minority was HBeAg-positive. The median age was 42. At liver biopsy most patients had Metavir score of F0-F1. Univariate analysis between 280 NT patients and the 290 naïve to treatment showed that NT patients were mostly female (P=0.002), not Italian (P=0.044), younger (P<0.001). Metavir score was lower in NT (P0.002), such as the Fib4 score (P<0.001). HBV DNA level was significantly higher in NT. At multivariate analysis, independent variables associated with no-treatment were younger age, female gender, Metavir score F0-F1, Fib4 lower than 1.6 and lower blood level of HBV-DNA.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a large number of patients eligible to treatment who do not receive it. A younger age and a less severe disease seem to be associated to deferral of treatment.

Serum hepatitis B core-related antigen as a treatment predictor of pegylated interferon in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The role of quantitative serum hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) receiving pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) is unclear. This study was aimed at comparing its usefulness with quantitative HBsAg in patients with HBeAg-positive CHB receiving PEG-IFN therapy.

METHODS

A total 46 patients treated with PEG-IFN for 48 weeks were retrospectively analysed. Intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) from paired liver biopsies and serial serum HBsAg and HBcrAg during therapy were assessed.

RESULTS

Virological response (VR), defined as HBeAg clearance and HBV DNA <2000 IU/ml at 24 weeks post treatment, was achieved in 15 (32.6%) patients. Responders had significantly higher cccDNA decline from baseline compared with non-responders. Baseline HBsAg and HBcrAg were correlated with cccDNA (r = 0.424, P = 0.020 and r = 0.564, P = 0.001, respectively), and changes in the corresponding markers during therapy were correlated with cccDNA reduction (r = 0.579, P = 0.001 and r = 0.503, P = 0.005, respectively). Responders showed more rapid decline of both markers during therapy compared with non-responders. In multivariate analysis, serum HBcrAg at week 12 was identified as a predictor of VR. The optimal cut-off value for HBcrAg (log10 8.0 U/ml) provided negative predictive value (NPV) of achieving VR at weeks 12 and 24 of 94.4 and 100%, respectively, while using HBsAg > 20 000 IU/ml provided NPV of 80 and 100% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The convenient quantitative HBcrAg represented a reliable marker of intrahepatic cccDNA. Monitoring HBcrAg levels during PEG-IFN therapy may help identify patients with a very low probability of response comparable to, if not better than, quantitative HBsAg.

HBV: Do I treat my immunotolerant patients?

Immunotolerant patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection are characterized by positive HBeAg, high viral replication, persistently normal ALT and no or minimal liver damage. Since the risk of the progression of liver disease and the chance of a sustained response with existing anti-HBV agents are low, current guidelines do not recommend treatment but close monitoring with serial alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and HBV DNA measurements instead. However, not treating all these patients is a concern because advanced histological lesions have been reported in certain cases who are usually older (>30-40 years old), and continued high HBV replication could increase the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Thus, the optimal management of immunotolerant patients is often individualised according to age, which is associated with histological severity and patient outcome. In particular, immunotolerant patients <30 years old can be monitored for ALT and HBV DNA, while treatment is often recommended in the few patients over 40. A liver biopsy and/or non-invasive assessment of fibrosis may be helpful to determine the therapeutic strategy in patients between 30 and 40 years old. Moreover, there are three specific subgroups of immunotolerant patients who often require treatment with oral anti-HBV agents: patients who will receive immunosuppressive treatment or chemotherapy, women with serum HBV DNA >10(6-7) IU/ml during the last trimester of pregnancy and certain healthcare professionals with high viraemia levels. More studies are needed to further clarify the natural history for the optimal timing of treatment in this setting.

Personalized treatment of hepatitis B

There are seven approved drugs for treatment of hepatitis B. Professional guidelines provide a framework for managing patients but these guidelines should be interpreted in the context of the individual patient's clinical and social circumstances. Personalized management of hepatitis B can be applied based on prediction of the individual patient's risk of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma to guide the frequency and intensity of monitoring and urgency of treatment. It can also be applied to decisions regarding when to start treatment, which drug to use, and when to stop based on the individual patient's disease characteristics, preference, comorbidities and other mitigating circumstances.