Outcome and potentially modifiable risk factors for candidemia in critically ill burns patients: A matched cohort study

Identification of Risk Factors for Intra-Abdominal Candidiasis

Background: Intra-abdominal candidiasis (IAC) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. Identifying high-risk populations may facilitate early and selective directed therapy in appropriate patients and avoid unwarranted treatment and any associated adverse effects in those who are low risk. Patients and Methods: This retrospective, case-control study included patients >18 years of age admitted from July 1, 2010 to July 1, 2021 who had a microbiologically confirmed intra-abdominal infection (gastrointestinal culture positive for either a Candida spp. [cases] or bacterial isolate [controls] collected intra-operatively or from a drain placed within 24 hours). Patients receiving peritoneal dialysis treatment or with a peritoneal dialysis catheter in place or treated at an outside hospital were excluded. Multivariable regression was utilized to identify independent risk factors for the development of IAC. Results: Five hundred twenty-three patients were screened, and 250 met inclusion criteria (125 per cohort). Multivariable analysis identified exposure to corticosteroids (odds ratio [OR], 5.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.52-13.32; p < 0.0001), upper gastrointestinal tract surgery (OR, 3.51; 95% CI, 1.25-9.87; p = 0.017), and mechanical ventilation (OR, 3.09; 95% CI 1.5-6.37; p = 0.002) were independently associated with IAC. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) and goodness of fit were 0.7813 and p = 0.5024, respectively. Conclusions: Exposure to corticosteroids, upper gastrointestinal tract surgery, and mechanical ventilation are independent risk factors for the development of microbiologically confirmed IAC suggesting these factors may help identify high-risk individuals requiring antifungal therapy.

Surviving Sepsis After Burn Campaign

INTRODUCTION

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign was developed to improve outcomes for all patients with sepsis. Despite sepsis being the primary cause of death after thermal injury, burns have always been excluded from the Surviving Sepsis efforts. To improve sepsis outcomes in burn patients, an international group of burn experts developed the Surviving Sepsis After Burn Campaign (SSABC) as a testable guideline to improve burn sepsis outcomes.

METHODS

The International Society for Burn Injuries (ISBI) reached out to regional or national burn organizations to recommend members to participate in the program. Two members of the ISBI developed specific "patient/population, intervention, comparison and outcome" (PICO) questions that paralleled the 2021 Surviving Sepsis Campaign [1]. SSABC participants were asked to search the current literature and rate its quality for each topic. At the Congress of the ISBI, in Guadalajara, Mexico, August 28, 2022, a majority of the participants met to create "statements" based on the literature. The "summary statements" were then sent to all members for comment with the hope of developing an 80% consensus. After four reviews, a consensus statement for each topic was created or "no consensus" was reported.

RESULTS

The committee developed sixty statements within fourteen topics that provide guidance for the early treatment of sepsis in burn patients. These statements should be used to improve the care of sepsis in burn patients. The statements should not be considered as "static" comments but should rather be used as guidelines for future testing of the best treatments for sepsis in burn patients. They should be updated on a regular basis.

CONCLUSION

Members of the burn community from the around the world have developed the Surviving Sepsis After Burn Campaign guidelines with the goal of improving the outcome of sepsis in burn patients.

Clinical and Microbiological Characteristics of Neonates with Candidemia and Impacts of Therapeutic Strategies on the Outcomes

Neonatal candidemia is associated with significant morbidities and a high mortality rate. We aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of Candida bloodstream infections in neonates and the impact of therapeutic strategies on the outcomes. We identified all the neonates with candidemia from a medical center in Taiwan over an 18-year period (2003−2021) and analyzed them. Clinical isolates were confirmed by DNA sequencing, and antifungal susceptibility testing was performed. The prognostic factors associated with clinical treatment failure (30-day, all-cause mortality and persistent candidemia > 72 h after antifungal agents) and in-hospital mortality were analyzed using logistic regression modeling. A total of 123 neonates with 139 episodes of candidemia were included in the study. The median (IQR) gestational age and birth weight of the neonates with candidemia were 29.0 (26.0−35.0) weeks and 1104.0 (762.0−2055) g, respectively. The most common Candida spp. was Candida albicans (n = 57, 41.0%), followed by C. parapsilosis (n = 44, 31.7%), Candida guilliermondii (n = 12, 8.6%), and C. glabrata (n = 11, 7.9%). The overall susceptibility to fluconazole was 81.3%, and the resistant rates against other antifungal agents were less than 3%. The cumulative mortality rate at 7 and 30 days after the first episode of candidemia was 11.3% and 32.3%, respectively. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 42.3%. The treatment outcomes did not change over the study period and were not affected by delayed initiation of antifungal agents. Multivariate analysis showed that delayed catheter removal (odds ratio [OR], 5.54; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.93−15.86, p = 0.001), septic shock (OR, 7.88; 95% CI: 2.83−21.93, p < 0.001), and multiple chronic comorbidities (OR, 8.71; 95% CI: 1.82−41.81, p = 0.007) were independently associated with the final in-hospital mortality. We concluded that the overall mortality of neonatal candidemia has remained consistently high over the past decade. Prompt early catheter removal and an aggressive treatment strategy for neonatal candidemia with septic shock would be critical to improving patient outcomes.

Risk Factors for Intra-Abdominal Candidiasis in Intensive Care Units: Results from EUCANDICU Study

INTRODUCTION

Intra-abdominal infections represent the second most frequently acquired infection in the intensive care unit (ICU), with mortality rates ranging from 20% to 50%. Candida spp. may be responsible for up to 10-30% of cases. This study assesses risk factors for development of intra-abdominal candidiasis (IAC) among patients admitted to ICU.

METHODS

We performed a case-control study in 26 European ICUs during the period January 2015-December 2016. Patients at least 18 years old who developed an episode of microbiologically documented IAC during their stay in the ICU (at least 48 h after admission) served as the case cohort. The control group consisted of adult patients who did not develop episodes of IAC during ICU admission. Matching was performed at a ratio of 1:1 according to time at risk (i.e. controls had to have at least the same length of ICU stay as their matched cases prior to IAC onset), ICU ward and period of study.

RESULTS

During the study period, 101 case patients with a diagnosis of IAC were included in the study. On univariate analysis, severe hepatic failure, prior receipt of antibiotics, prior receipt of parenteral nutrition, abdominal drain, prior bacterial infection, anastomotic leakage, recurrent gastrointestinal perforation, prior receipt of antifungal drugs and higher median number of abdominal surgical interventions were associated with IAC development. On multivariate analysis, recurrent gastrointestinal perforation (OR 13.90; 95% CI 2.65-72.82, p = 0.002), anastomotic leakage (OR 6.61; 95% CI 1.98-21.99, p = 0.002), abdominal drain (OR 6.58; 95% CI 1.73-25.06, p = 0.006), prior receipt of antifungal drugs (OR 4.26; 95% CI 1.04-17.46, p = 0.04) or antibiotics (OR 3.78; 95% CI 1.32-10.52, p = 0.01) were independently associated with IAC.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastrointestinal perforation, anastomotic leakage, abdominal drain and prior receipt of antifungals or antibiotics may help to identify critically ill patients with higher probability of developing IAC. Prospective studies are needed to identify which patients will benefit from early antifungal treatment.

Diagnosis and Management of Invasive Candida Infections in Critically Ill Patients

Invasive candidiasis (IC) has become a serious problem in the intensive care unit patients with an attributable mortality rate that can reach up to 51%. Multiple global surveillance studies have shown an increasing incidence of candidemia. Despite their limited sensitivity (21-71%), cultures remain the gold standard for the diagnosis of IC associated with candidemia. Many adjunct laboratory tests exist to support or rule out the diagnosis, each with its indications and limitations, including procalcitonin, 1,3-β-D-glucan, mannan and anti-mannan antibodies, and Candida albicans germ tube antibody. In addition, polymerase chain reaction-based methods could expedite species identification in positive blood cultures, helping in guiding early empirical antifungal therapy. The management of IC in critically ill patients can be classified into prophylactic, preemptive, empiric, and directed/targeted therapy of a documented infection. There is no consensus concerning the benefit of prophylactic therapy in critically ill patients. While early initiation of appropriate therapy in confirmed IC is an important determinant of survival, the selection of candidates and drug of choice for empirical systemic antifungal therapy is more controversial. The choice of antifungal agents is determined by many factors, including the host, the site of infection, the species of the isolated Candida, and its susceptibility profile. Echinocandins are considered initial first-line therapy agents. Due to the conflicting results of the various studies on the benefit of preemptive therapy for critically ill patients and the lack of robust evidence, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) omitted this category from its updated guidelines and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) and the Critically Ill Patients Study Group of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) do not recommend it.

Quantification of 1,3-β-d-glucan by Wako β-glucan assay for rapid exclusion of invasive fungal infections in critical patients: A diagnostic test accuracy study

OBJECTIVES

Rapid and reliable exclusion of invasive fungal infections (IFI) by markers able to avoid unnecessary empirical antifungal treatment is still a critical unmet clinical need. We investigated the diagnostic performance of a newly available β-d-Glucan (BDG) quantification assay, focusing on the optimisation of the BDG cut-off values for IFI exclusion.

METHODS

BDG results by Wako β-glucan assay (lower limit of detection [LLOD] = 2.16 pg/mL, positivity ≥ 11 pg/mL) on two consecutive serum samples were retrospectively analysed in 170 patients, admitted to haematological wards (N = 42), intensive care units (ICUs; N = 80), or other wards (N = 48), exhibiting clinical signs and/or symptoms suspected for IFI. Only patients with proven IFI (EORTC/MSG criteria) were considered as true positives in the assessment of BDG sensitivity, specificity and predictive values.

RESULTS

Patients were diagnosed with no IFI (69.4%), proven IFI (25.3%) or probable IFI (5.3%). Two consecutive BDG values < LLOD performed within a median of 1 (interquartile range: 1-3) day were able to exclude a proven IFI with 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value (primary study goal). Test's specificity improved by using two distinct positivity and negativity cut-offs (7.7 pg/mL and LLOD, respectively), but remained suboptimal in ICU patients (50%), as compared to haematological or other patients (93% and 90%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The classification of Wako's results as negative when < LLOD, and positive when > 7.7 pg/mL, could be a promising diagnostic approach to confidently rule out an IFI in both ICU and non-ICU patients. The poor specificity in the ICU setting remains a concern, due to the difficulty to interpret positive results in this fragile population.

The A2B trial, antibiotic prophylaxis for excision-graft surgery in burn patients: a multicenter randomized double-blind study

BACKGROUND

The indication for antibiotic prophylaxis in burn patients remains highly controversial, with no consensus having been reached. The objective of antibiotic prophylaxis is to reduce the risk of postoperative local and systemic infections. Burn surgery is associated with a high incidence of bacteremia, postoperative infections, and sepsis. However, antibiotic prophylaxis exposes patients to the risk of selecting drug-resistant pathogens as well as to the adverse effects of antibiotics (i.e., Clostridium difficile colitis). The lack of data precludes any strong international recommendations regarding perioperative prophylaxis using systemic antibiotics in this setting. The goal of this project is therefore to determine whether perioperative systemic antibiotic prophylaxis can reduce the incidence of postoperative infections in burn patients.

METHODS

The A2B trial is a multicenter (10 centers), prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. The trial will involve the recruitment of 506 adult burn patients with a total body surface area (TBSA) burn of between 5 and 40% and requiring at least one excision-graft surgery for deep burn injury. Participants will be randomized to receive antibiotic prophylaxis (antibiotic prophylaxis group) or a placebo (control group) 30 min before the incision of the first two surgeries. The primary outcome will be the occurrence of postoperative infections defined as postoperative sepsis and/or surgical site infection and/or graft lysis requiring a new graft within 7 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes will include mortality at day 90 postrandomization, skin graft lysis requiring a new graft procedure, postoperative bacteremia (within 48 h of surgery), postoperative sepsis, postoperative surgical site infection, number of hospitalizations until complete healing (> 95% TBSA), number of hospitalization days living without antibiotic therapy at day 28 and day 90, and multiresistant bacterial colonization or infection at day 28 and day 90.

DISCUSSION

The trial aims to provide evidence on the efficacy and safety of antibiotic prophylaxis for excision-graft surgery in burn patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04292054 . Registered on 2 March 2020.

Fungal Infections in Burn Patients

Background: Fungal burn wound infections are among the most devastating complications in patients who are severely burned. Increasing incidence of burn wound infections caused by fungi led to new challenges in diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. The wide use of broad-spectrum antibiotic agents, an increased prevalence of molds and non-Candida albicans spp., and the variety of available antifungal agents underline the importance of identifying the causative species, to initiate adequate therapy within an adequate timeframe. Methods: Review of the pertinent English and German literature. Results: Fungal burn wound infections go along with a delay of identifying the causative fungus species and can be mistaken for early bacterial burn wound infection. Recently, an increase of uncommon fungal pathogens and fungi resistance against antifungal agents has been reported. Amphotericin B and voriconazole remain the antifungal drugs used most commonly. Conclusions: Adequate therapy remains challenging. Early radical debridement and wound closure play an imperative part, particularly in preventing infections caused by yeasts and molds or any other agent. Prophylactic empiric pharmacologic treatment is reserved for those highly at risk for invasive burn wound infection only. Because of the emergence of drug-resistant fungi, the development of new antifungal drugs is essential for the battle against fungal burn wound infections.

β-Lapachone enhances the antifungal activity of fluconazole against a Pdr5p-mediated resistant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of lapachones in disrupting the fungal multidrug resistance (MDR) phenotype, using a model of study which an azole-resistant Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant strain that overexpresses the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter Pdr5p.

METHODS

The evaluation of the antifungal activity of lapachones and their possible synergism with fluconazole against the mutant S. cerevisiae strain was performed through broth microdilution and spot assays. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and efflux pump activity were assessed by fluorometry. ATPase activity was evaluated by the Fiske and Subbarow method. The effect of β-lapachone on PDR5 mRNA expression was assessed by RT-PCR. The release of hemoglobin was measured to evaluate the hemolytic activity of β-lapachone.

RESULTS

α-nor-Lapachone and β-lapachone inhibited S. cerevisiae growth at 100 μg/ml. Only β-lapachone enhanced the antifungal activity of fluconazole, and this combined action was inhibited by ascorbic acid. β-Lapachone induced the production of ROS, inhibited Pdr5p-mediated efflux, and impaired Pdr5p ATPase activity. Also, β-lapachone neither affected the expression of PDR5 nor exerted hemolytic activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Data obtained indicate that β-lapachone is able to inhibit the S. cerevisiae efflux pump Pdr5p. Since this transporter is homologous to fungal ABC transporters, further studies employing clinical isolates that overexpress these proteins will be conducted to evaluate the effect of β-lapachone on pathogenic fungi.

Oral Health Knowledge Level of Nursing Staff Working in Semi-Intensive Heart Failure Units

PURPOSE

Critical care units, such as heart failure units, house inpatients with a compromised general health status that requires rigorous prevention of further complications. Oral health infections that gain access through the bloodstream or airway might represent such potential complications (eg, endocarditis pneumonia). Avoiding these critical occurrences requires that adequate oral health care be provided by nursing personnel. Here we assessed the knowledge of oral health care practices by nurses working in three Italian heart failure units in Umbria, Italy.

DESIGN

This was a cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Forty-four nurses were interviewed using a six-item modified Adams' questionnaire on the topic of oral health care. A multidisciplinary panel of experts established the criteria for answer correctness based on the most relevant dentistry literature evidence and judged each reply. The expected percentage of correctly replying nurses was 75%, and significant differences from this expected probability were calculated with one-sided binomial probability tests. Cronbach's α method was used to establish the questionnaire's internal consistency (reliability).

RESULTS

For five out of six questionnaire items, the percentage of nurses who correctly answered was significantly lower than the expected value of probability. Lack of knowledge was found for usefulness of checking the patients' mouths (p=0.003), the most relevant lesions affecting the mouth (p=0.0001), the tools/solutions for cleaning the mouth and dentures (p= 0.0416), and drugs that affect the mouth and their side effects (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In this study, few nurses working in heart failure units showed both an adequate willingness to check inpatients and a good knowledge of oral health care (significantly lower than the expected 75%). Further studies that use validated questionnaires and include more participants should be conducted to confirm and elaborate on our preliminary data.

Time to and differential time to blood culture positivity for assessing catheter-related yeast fungaemia: A longitudinal, 7-year study in a single university hospital

BACKGROUND

Time to positivity (TTP) and differential time to positivity (DTTP) between central and peripheral blood cultures are commonly used for bacteraemia to evaluate the likelihood of central venous catheter (CVC)-related bloodstream infection. Few studies have addressed these approaches to yeast fungaemia.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate TTP and DTTP to assess CVC-related yeast fungaemia (CVC-RYF).

PATIENTS/METHODS

We retrospectively analysed the results from 105 adult patients with incident fungaemia, with CVC removed and cultured, collected from 2010 to 2017. The bottles were incubated in a BioMérieux BacT/ALERT 3D and kept for at least 5 days.

RESULTS

Of the 105 patients included, most were oncology patients (85.7%) and had of long-term CVC (79.6%); 32 (30.5%) had a culture-positive CVC (defined as CVC-RYF) with the same species as in blood culture, and 69.5% had culture-negative CVC (defined as non-CVC-RYF, NCVC-RYF). Candida albicans represented 46% of the episodes. The median TTP was statistically different between CVC-RYF and NCVC-RYF (16.8 hours interquartile range (IQR) [9.7-28.6] vs 29.4 hours [IQR 20.7-41.3]; P = .001). A TTP <10 hours had the best positive likelihood ratio (21.5) for CVC-RYF, although the sensitivity was only 28%. DTTP was available for 52 patients. A DTTP >5 hours had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 71% for CVC-RYF.

CONCLUSIONS

Since the median TTP was 17 hours and the most performing DTTP >5 hours, these delays are too long to take a decision in the same operational day. More rapid methods for detecting infected catheters should be tested to avoid unnecessary CVC withdrawal.