Deep Brain Stimulation for Multiple Sclerosis Tremor: A Meta-Analysis

Brain stimulation for patients with multiple sclerosis: an umbrella review of therapeutic efficacy

Multiple sclerosis patients often experience various symptoms that can greatly impact their quality of life. There are various brain stimulation techniques that have been evaluated for their ability to reduce the symptoms of multiple sclerosis. However, there is inconsistency in the specific stimulation methods used and the symptoms targeted in the existing research. This umbrella review conducted in order to evaluate the effectiveness of brain stimulation and identify limitations and gaps for further research. In this umbrella review, we conducted a searched on Web of Knowledge, PubMed, and Scopus database. We specifically looked for reviews, with or without meta-analyses, that have investigated the effects of brain stimulation methods on symptoms of multiple sclerosis. All articles were examined by AMSTAR 2 (A Measure Tool to Assess Systematic Review 2). We identified 155 articles, of which 14 were eligible for inclusion. Of those, five were qualitative studies and nine were meta-analyses. Among the included studies, four examined the use of deep brain stimulation, while ten investigated the therapeutic potential of noninvasive brain stimulation. Considering the heterogeneity of studies, the current evidence suggests that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation may be effective in treating pain and improving motor function, while transcranial direct current stimulation may be useful in alleviating fatigue and enhancing certain aspects of cognitive performance. Deep brain stimulation, on the other hand, appears to be effective in reducing tremors. However, further research is warranted to validate these findings and address the existing limitations in the field.

Managing multiple sclerosis in individuals aged 55 and above: a comprehensive review

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) management in individuals aged 55 and above presents unique challenges due to the complex interaction between aging, comorbidities, immunosenescence, and MS pathophysiology. This comprehensive review explores the evolving landscape of MS in older adults, including the increased incidence and prevalence of MS in this age group, the shift in disease phenotypes from relapsing-remitting to progressive forms, and the presence of multimorbidity and polypharmacy. We aim to provide an updated review of the available evidence of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) in older patients, including the efficacy and safety of existing therapies, emerging treatments such as Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTKs) inhibitors and those targeting remyelination and neuroprotection, and the critical decisions surrounding the initiation, de-escalation, and discontinuation of DMTs. Non-pharmacologic approaches, including physical therapy, neuromodulation therapies, cognitive rehabilitation, and psychotherapy, are also examined for their role in holistic care. The importance of MS Care Units and advance care planning are explored as a cornerstone in providing patient-centric care, ensuring alignment with patient preferences in the disease trajectory. Finally, the review emphasizes the need for personalized management and continuous monitoring of MS patients, alongside advocating for inclusive study designs in clinical research to improve the management of this growing patient demographic.

Focused Ultrasound for Treatment of Movement Disorders: A Review of Non-Food and Drug Administration Approved Indications

INTRODUCTION

MRI-guided focused ultrasound (FUS) is an incisionless thermo-ablative procedure that may be used to treat medication-refractory movement disorders, with a growing number of potential anatomic targets and clinical applications. As of this article's publication, the only US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved uses of FUS for movement disorders are thalamotomy for essential tremor (ET) and tremor-dominant Parkinson's Disease (PD), and pallidotomy for other cardinal symptoms of PD. We present a state-of-the-art review on all non-FDA approved indications of FUS for movement disorders, beyond the most well-described indications of ET and PD. Our objective was to summarize the safety and efficacy of FUS in this setting and provide a roadmap for future directions of FUS for movement disorders.

METHODS

A state-of-the-art review was conducted on use of FUS for non-FDA approved movement disorders. All movement disorders excluding FDA-approved uses for ET and PD were included.

RESULTS

A total of 25 studies on 172 patients were included. In patients with tremor plus dystonia syndromes (n = 6), ventralis intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (VIM)-FUS gave >50% tremor reduction, with no improvement in dystonia and worsened dystonia in 2/6 patients. Ventral-oralis complex (VO)-FUS gave >50% improvement for focal hand dystonia (n = 6) and 100% return to musical performance in musician's dystonia (n = 6). In patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and tremor (n = 3), improvement in tremor was seen in 2 patients with a favorable skull density ratio; no MS disease change was noted after VIM-FUS. In patients with tremor and comorbid ataxia syndromes (n = 3), none were found to have worsened ataxia after VIM-FUS; all had clinically significant tremor improvement. Subthalamic nucleus (STN)-FUS for PD (n = 49) gave approximately 50% improvement in PD motor symptoms, with dystonia and mild dyskinesias as possible adverse effects. Cerebellothalamic tract (CTT-FUS) for ET (n = 42) gave 55-90% tremor improvement, with gait dysfunction as a rare persistent adverse effect. Pallidothalamic tract (PTT-FUS) for PD (n = 50) gave approximately 50% improvement in motor symptoms, with mild speech dysfunction as a possible adverse effect.

CONCLUSION

VIM-FUS appeared safe and effective for heterogenous tremor etiologies, and VO-FUS appeared most effective for isolated segmental dystonia. STN-FUS was effective for PD symptom reduction; postoperative dystonia and mild on-medication dyskinesias required medical management. Tractography-based targeting with CTT-FUS for ET and PTT-FUS for PD demonstrated promising early results. Larger prospective trials with long-term follow-up are needed to the evaluate the safety and efficacy non-FDA approved indications for FUS.

The Fast Gray Matter Acquisition T1 Inversion Recovery Sequence in Deep Brain Stimulation: Introducing the Rubral Wing for Dentato-Rubro-Thalamic Tract Depiction and Tremor Control

BACKGROUND

The dentato-rubro-thalamic tract (DRT) is currently considered as a potential target in deep brain stimulation (DBS) for various types of tremor. However, tractography depiction can vary depending on the included brain regions. The fast gray matter acquisition T1 inversion recovery (FGATIR) sequence, with excellent delineation of gray and white matter, possibly provides anatomical identification of rubro-thalamic DRT fibers.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the FGATIR sequence by comparison with DRT depiction, electrode localization, and effectiveness of DBS therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In patients with DBS therapy because of medication-refractory tremor, the FGATIR sequence was evaluated for depiction of the thalamus, red nucleus (RN), and rubro-thalamic connections. Deterministic tractography of the DRT, electrode localization, and tremor control were compared. The essential tremor rating scale was used to assess (hand) tremor. Tremor control was considered successful when complete tremor suppression (grade 0) or almost complete suppression (grade 1) was observed.

RESULTS

In the postoperative phase, we evaluated 14 patients who underwent DRT-guided DBS: 12 patients with essential tremor, one with tremor-dominant Parkinson disease, and one with multiple sclerosis, representing 24 trajectories. Mean follow-up was 11.3 months (range 6-19 months). The FGATIR sequence provided a clear delineation of a hypointense white matter tract within the hyperintense thalamus. In coronal plane, this tract was most readily recognizable as a "rubral wing," with the round RN as base and lateral triangular convergence. The deterministic DRT depiction was consistently situated within the rubral wing. The number of active contacts located within the DRT (and rubral wing) was 22 (92%), of which 16 (73%) showed successful tremor control.

CONCLUSIONS

The FGATIR sequence offers visualization of the rubro-thalamic connections that form the DRT, most readily recognizable as a "rubral wing" in coronal plane. This sequence contributes to tractographic depiction of DRT and provides a direct anatomical DBS target area for tremor control.

Patient selection and outcome of deep brain stimulation for multiple sclerosis-associated tremor

INTRODUCTION

Tremor is a disabling symptom of multiple sclerosis (MS), with limited treatment modalities. Thalamic ventral-intermediate-nucleus (VIM) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a method of neuromodulation. We describe the long-term outcomes of our carefully selected patients who underwent VIM DBS for their MS-associated tremor.

METHODS

Patients were referred from the regional neurology units. Pre-operative assessments included suitability for anesthesia, tremor quantification by the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin scores, and quality-of-life (EQ5D) measures. Exclusion criteria included prominent cerebellar symptoms such as ataxia and dysmetria, intracranial pathology such as ventriculomegaly, cerebellar plaques and thalamic abnormality, and comorbid psychiatric symptoms. Seven patients (3M:4F) underwent DBS for MS-associated tremor between September 2013 and February 2019. Mean age was 42 years (±SD 8 years). DBS was performed at a mean of 13 years (±SD 9 years) after diagnosis of MS.

RESULTS

There were no postoperative surgical complications. All patients showed improvement in FTM tremor scores, by up to 61% at 6 months postoperatively. There was an improvement of 30-175% in quality-of-life scores at 6 months. Improvement of tremor and quality of life, over baseline, was sustained over a long period of follow-up (mean 26.6 months ± SD 20.7 months), including our longest duration at 72 months.

CONCLUSION

With careful selection, DBS is a safe, efficacious intervention for MS-tremor and can positively impact on tremor and quality of life, with effects over a long period. As patients live longer with MS and the advent of new therapies, DBS should be considered for selected patients.

Connectomic analysis of unilateral dual lead thalamic deep brain stimulation for treatment of multiple sclerosis tremor

Tremor is a common symptom in multiple sclerosis and can present as a severe postural and action tremor, leading to significant disability. Owing to the diffuse and progressive nature of the disease, it has been challenging to characterize the pathophysiology underlying multiple sclerosis tremor. Deep brain stimulation of the ventralis intermedius and the ventralis oralis posterior thalamic nuclei has been used to treat medically refractory multiple sclerosis tremors with variable results. The aim of this study was to characterize multiple sclerosis tremor at the network level by applying modern connectomic techniques to data from a previously completed single-centre, randomized, single-blind prospective trial of 12 subjects who were treated with unilateral dual-lead (ventralis intermedius + ventralis oralis posterior) thalamic deep brain stimulation. Preoperative T₁-weighted MRI and postoperative head CTs were used, along with applied programming settings, to estimate the volume of tissue activated for each patient. The volumes of tissue activated were then used to make voxel-wise and structural connectivity correlations with clinically observed tremor suppression. The volume of the tissue-activated analyses identified the optimal region of stimulation at the ventralis oralis posterior ventralis intermedius border intersecting with the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract. A regression model showed strong connectivity to the supplemental motor area was positively associated with tremor suppression (r = 0.66) in this cohort, whereas connectivity to the primary motor cortex was negatively associated with tremor suppression (r = −0.69), a finding opposite to that seen in ventralis intermedius deep brain stimulation for essential tremor. Comparing the structural connectivity to that of an essential tremor cohort revealed a distinct network that lies anterior to the essential tremor network. Overall, the volumes of tissue activated and connectivity observations converge to suggest that optimal suppression of multiple sclerosis tremor will likely be achieved by directing stimulation more anteriorly toward the ventralis oralis posterior and that a wide field of stimulation synergistically modulating the ventralis oralis posterior and ventralis intermedius nuclei may be more effective than traditional ventralis intermedius deep brain stimulation at suppressing the severe tremors commonly seen in complex tremor syndromes such as multiple sclerosis tremor.

Therapeutic maps for a sensor-based evaluation of deep brain stimulation programming

Programming in deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a labour-intensive process for treating advanced motor symptoms. Specifically for patients with medication-refractory tremor in multiple sclerosis (MS). Wearable sensors are able to detect some manifestations of pathological signs, such as intention tremor in MS. However, methods are needed to visualise the response of tremor to DBS parameter changes in a clinical setting while patients perform the motor task finger-to-nose. To this end, we attended DBS programming sessions of a MS patient and intention tremor was effectively quantified by acceleration amplitude and frequency. A new method is introduced which results in the generation of therapeutic maps for a systematic review of the programming procedure in DBS. The maps visualise the combination of tremor acceleration power, clinical rating scores, total electrical energy delivered to the brain and possible side effects. Therapeutic maps have not yet been employed and could lead to a certain degree of standardisation for more objective decisions about DBS settings. The maps provide a base for future research on visualisation tools to assist physicians who frequently encounter patients for DBS therapy.

Deep brain stimulation for multiple sclerosis tremor: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in treating MS-related tremor.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and gray literature using a search strategy including the MeSH and text words as (((Brain Stimulations) OR (Deep Brain Stimulations) OR (Deep Brain Stimulations) OR (Deep Brain Brain Stimulation) OR (Deep Electrical Stimulation of the Brain)) AND (Multiple Sclerosis OR Sclerosis, Multiple) OR Sclerosis, Disseminated) OR Disseminated Sclerosis) OR MS (Multiple Sclerosis)) OR Multiple Sclerosis, Acute Fulminating).

RESULTS

The literature search revealed 1663 articles, 1027 of which remained after removing duplicates. Seventeen articles, published between 1999-2018, were included for the meta-analysis, including overall 168 patients. Follow-up time ranged between 6-62 months. The pooled frequency of tremor improvement among the enrolled patients was 73%, (95% CI:64-83%) (I²=84.1%, p<0.001). The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) (after -before) was -2.9, (95% CI:-4.8, -0.98) (I²=89.8%, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate MS-related tremor improvement after DBS.

Deep Brain Stimulation for Tremor and Dystonia

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is the most commonly used surgical treatment for drug-refractory movement disorders such as tremor and dystonia. Appropriate patient selection along with target selection is important to ensure optimal outcome without complications. This review summarizes the recent literature regarding the mechanism of action, indications, outcome, and complications of DBS in tremor and dystonia. A comparison with other modalities of surgical interventions is discussed along with a note of the recent advances in technology. Future research needs to be directed to understand the underlying etiopathogenesis of the disease and the way in which DBS modulates the intracranial abnormal networks.

Can Enhancing Neuronal Activity Improve Myelin Repair in Multiple Sclerosis?

Enhanced neuronal activity in the healthy brain can induce de novo myelination and behavioral changes. As neuronal activity can be achieved using non-invasive measures, it may be of interest to utilize the innate ability of neuronal activity to instruct myelination as a novel strategy for myelin repair in demyelinating disorders such as multiple sclerosis (MS). Preclinical studies indicate that stimulation of neuronal activity in demyelinated lesions indeed has the potential to improve remyelination and that the stimulation paradigm is an important determinant of success. However, future studies will need to reveal the most efficient stimulation protocols as well as the biological mechanisms implicated. Nonetheless, clinical studies have already explored non-invasive brain stimulation as an attractive therapeutic approach that ameliorates MS symptomatology. However, whether symptom improvement is due to improved myelin repair remains unclear. In this mini-review, we discuss the neurobiological basis and potential of enhancing neuronal activity as a novel therapeutic approach in MS.

Deep-Brain Stimulation for Essential Tremor and Other Tremor Syndromes: A Narrative Review of Current Targets and Clinical Outcomes

Tremor is a prevalent symptom associated with multiple conditions, including essential tremor (ET), Parkinson's disease (PD), multiple sclerosis (MS), stroke and trauma. The surgical management of tremor evolved from stereotactic lesions to deep-brain stimulation (DBS), which allowed safe and reversible interference with specific neural networks. This paper reviews the current literature on DBS for tremor, starting with a detailed discussion of current tremor targets (ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (Vim), prelemniscal radiations (Raprl), caudal zona incerta (Zi), thalamus (Vo) and subthalamic nucleus (STN)) and continuing with a discussion of results obtained when performing DBS in the various aforementioned tremor syndromes. Future directions for DBS research are then briefly discussed.

Transcranial magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy as a safe treatment option in multiple sclerosis patients with essential tremor

Transcranial magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound is a recently introduced incisionless treating option for essential tremor and tremor-dominant idiopathic Parkinson disease. There is preliminary evidence that it may result in a promising effective treatment option for other movement disorders too. Here, we report on two patients with multiple sclerosis with medication refractory debilitating essential tremor comorbidity who successfully underwent unilateral Vim tcMRgFUS thalamotomy for tremor control. Patients' clinical condition and expanded disability status scale scores showed no changes during the 1-year follow-up period with no evidence of multiple sclerosis activity or progression.

Neural implant for the treatment of multiple sclerosis

The methods used to treat various neurological diseases are evolving. The facilities provided by the technology have led to creation of new treatment opportunities. Neuromodulation is one of these important methods. By definition, the neuromodulation is a change in neural activity which occurs by stimulating a specific area of nervous system. The mentioned stimulation can be electrical, magnetic, or chemical. This method is used in various diseases, such as stroke, Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Multiple sclerosis (MS) is no exception in this regard and methods including the neurofeedback and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are used to treat various complications of the MS. One aspect of neuromodulation is the use of neural implant, which is applied nowadays, especially in the Parkinson's disease, and the use of microchips and prostheses to treat various symptoms in different neurological diseases has received significant attention. Although neural implant has been exploited to improve the symptoms of MS, they appear to have much greater potential to improve the condition of patients with MS. It seems that more attention to the symptoms of MS, on the one hand, and a new approach to the pathogenesis of this disease and considering it as a connectomopathy, on the other hand, can provide new opportunities for application of this method in the treatment of MS.