Distensibility of the anal canal in patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence: a study with the Functional Lumen Imaging Probe

EndoFLIP evaluation of the pylorus during minimal invasive Ivor-Levis esophagectomy

BACKGROUND/AIMS

During esophagectomy for malignancy, the anterior and posterior branches of the vagus nerve are transected in order to achieve surgical radicality. This leads to loss of central nervous system-control of the pylorus which may lead to delayed gastric emptying. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of the EndoFLIP technique for assessment of pyloric biomechanical properties in patients undergoing esophagectomy.

METHODS

A feasibility study in six patients undergoing surgery was conducted. EndoFLIP measurements were carried out preoperative (Pre-op), after surgical resection (Post-op) and following prophylactic balloon dilatation of the pylorus (Post-dil). By measuring the cross-sectional area and pressure of the pylorus the pyloric compliance and the incremental pressure-strain elastic modulus (Ep) were calculated.

RESULTS

Placing the catheter in the pyloric region was successfully achieved in all six patients. No complications were observed. Resection of the esophagus increased the incremental pyloric elastic modulus (Ep) from 0.59 ± 0.18 kPa to 0.99 ± 0.34 kPa (p = 0.03). After dilatation, the Ep was reduced to 0.53 ± 0.23 kPa (p = 0.04), which was close to Pre-op (p = 0.62). The pyloric compliance showed a similar pattern as that found for Ep.

CONCLUSION

The EndoFLIP system holds promise for assessment of biomechanics of the pyloric region in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer.

A comparison of function lumen imaging probe measurements of anal sphincter function in fecal incontinence

BACKGROUND

The functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) is a test of anal sphincter distensibility under evaluation by specialist centers. Two measurement protocols termed "stepwise" and "ramp" are used, risking a lack of standardization. This study aims to compare the performance of these protocols to establish if there are differences between them.

METHODS

Patients with fecal incontinence were recruited and underwent measurement with both protocols at a tertiary pelvic floor referral unit. Differences in minimum diameter, FLIP bag pressure, and distensibility index (DI) at rest and during squeeze were calculated at various FLIP bag volumes.

KEY RESULTS

Twenty patients (19 female, mean age 61 [range: 38-78]) were included. The resting minimum diameter at 30 and 40 mL bag volumes were less in the stepwise protocol (mean bias: -0.55 mm and -1.18 mm, p < 0.05) along with the DI at the same bag volumes (mean bias: -0.37 mm2/mmHg and -0.55 mm2/mmHg, p < 0.05). There was also a trend towards greater bag pressures at 30 mL (mean bias: +2.08 mmHg, p = 0.114) and 40 mL (mean bias: +2.81 mmHg, p = 0.129) volumes in the stepwise protocol. There were no differences between protocols in measurements of minimum diameter, maximum bag pressure, or DI during voluntary squeeze (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION AND INFERENCES

There are differences between the two commonly described FLIP measurement protocols at rest, although there are no differences in the assessment of squeeze function. Consensus agreement is required to agree the most appropriate FLIP measurement protocol in assessing anal sphincter function.

The Functional Luminal Imaging Probe (FLIP): A Good Tool for Adjustment of anal Canal Dimensions During Operative Management of Fecal Incontinence

PURPOSE

Fecal incontinence is a troublesome problem in the field of colorectal surgery. The main aim of this study was to adjust the anal canal resistance during operative management of anal incontinence using Endo-FLIP.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study held at Cairo university hospital. Hundred forty-eight incontinent patients treated by different surgical procedures were included. During the procedure the Endo-FLIP was applied to adjust the anal canal dimensions (ACL and ACD) so the ACR could be adjusted based on the flow equation. These were also assessed pre-operatively with Endo-FLIP system and the flow equation calculator. The clinical severity of the disease and outcome after surgical procedures were assessed and correlated to the physiologic parameters.

RESULTS

ACL, ACD and ACR had had significant correlations to the degree of incontinence (P < .001). ACL, ACD and ACR showed statistically significant change with primary repair and gluteus maximus transposition operations. After treatment of fecal incontinence, in good responders' group, the mean resting anal canal resistance increased significantly to 4649.05 ± 1161.49 (postoperative) while in poor responders' group it was 1919.9 ± 1077.73.

CONCLUSIONS

The Endo-flip can be used to measure the anal canal geometric parameters (ACL and ACD) and then anal canal resistance could be calculated by the flow equation - pre-and post-operatively- which help the adjustment of the surgical repair of sphincter injury in fecal incontinence patients which may improve the surgical outcome.

Current and future perspectives on the utility of provocative tests of anal sphincter function: A state-of-the-art summary

BACKGROUND

The maintenance of fecal continence depends upon coordinated interactions between the pelvic floor, anorectum, and anal sphincter complex orchestrated by central and peripheral neural activities. The current techniques to objectively measure anorectal function rely on fixed diameter catheters placed inside the anal canal with a rectal balloon to obtain measurements of anal resting and squeeze function, and rectal compliance. Until recently it had not been possible to measure the distensibility of the anal canal, or in other words its ability to resist opening against an increasing pressure, which has been proposed as the main determinant of a biological sphincter's function. Anal acoustic reflectometry (AAR) and the functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) are two novel, provocative techniques that dynamically assess the anal sphincter complex under volume-controlled distension. In doing so, both provide information on the viscoelastic properties of the anal canal and offer new insights into its function.

PURPOSE

This review details the current and potential future applications of AAR and FLIP and highlights the unanswered questions relevant to these new technologies.

Relationship between anal functional lumen imaging probe (EndoFLIP®) results and the clinical presentation of faecal incontinence

AIM

Faecal incontinence (FI) subtypes (urge, passive, mixed) are linked to the physiopathological mechanism of FI. Previous studies have failed to demonstrate a consistent relationship between FI subtype and anal sphincter dysfunction. Our aim was to evaluate the relationship between anal sphincter function, assessed using the new EndoFLIP® technology, and FI subtype.

METHOD

Patients referred for FI were prospectively enrolled between October 2015 and May 2021 in a registry, and data were retrospectively examined. Each patient underwent a clinical assessment as well as three-dimensional high-resolution or water-perfused anorectal manometry, anal EndoFLIP®, and anorectal electrophysiological and endoanal ultrasound tests. The results of the investigations were compared across FI subtypes.

RESULTS

The cohort included 133 patients, 54 (41%) of whom met the criteria for urge FI, 40 (30%) for passive FI and 39 (29%) for mixed FI. The resting anal distensibility index (DI) at 50 ml of distension was significantly lower in patients with urge FI than in patients with passive FI (p = 0.04). At rest, a DI at 50 ml of distension ≥7.3 mm²  mmHg^-1 and a DI at 40 ml of distension <1.3 mm²  mmHg^-1 were associated with the passive and urge FI subtypes, respectively, with poor discriminatory power (an accuracy of 0.49 compared with 0.33 for random assignment). There were no differences in anorectal manometry, endoanal ultrasound or electrophysiological test results among the urge, passive and mixed FI subgroups (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The anal sphincter DI using the EndoFLIP® system displayed poor predictive performance in distinguishing among FI subtypes.

Anorectal Anatomy and Function

Anatomy of pelvic floor muscles has long been controversial. Novel imaging modalities, such as three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound imaging, MRI, and diffusion tensor imaging, have revealed unique myoarchitecture of the external anal sphincter and puborectalis muscle. High-resolution anal manometry, high-definition anal manometry, and functional luminal imaging probe are important new tools to assess anal sphincter and puborectalis muscle function. Increased understanding of the structure and function of anal sphincter complex/pelvic floor muscle has improved the ability to diagnose patients with pelvic floor disorders. New therapeutic modalities to treat anal/fecal incontinence and other pelvic floor disorders will emerge in the near future.

Do resistance exercises during biofeedback therapy enhance the anal sphincter and pelvic floor muscles in anal incontinence?

AIM

To determine if a biofeedback therapy that includes concentric resistance exercise for the anal sphincter muscles can improve muscle strength/function and improve AI symptoms compared to the traditional/non-resistance biofeedback therapy.

BACKGROUND

Biofeedback therapy is the current gold standard treatment for patients with anal incontinence (AI). Lack of resistance exercise biofeedback programs is a limitation in current practice.

METHODS

Thirty-three women with AI (mean age 60 years) were randomly assigned to concentric (resistance) or isometric (non-resistance) biofeedback training. Concentric training utilized the Functional Luminal Imaging Probe to provide progressive resistance exercises based on the patient's ability to collapse the anal canal lumen. Isometric training utilized a non-collapsible 10 mm diameter probe. Both groups performed a biofeedback protocol once per week in the clinic for 12 weeks and at home daily. High definition anal manometry was used to assess anal sphincter strength; symptoms were measured using FISI and UDI-6. 3D transperineal ultrasound imaging was used to assess the anal sphincter muscle integrity.

RESULTS

Concentric and isometric groups improved FISI and UDI-6 scores to a similar degree. Both the concentric and isometric groups showed small improvement in the anal high-pressure zone; however, there was no difference between the two groups. Ultrasound image analysis revealed significant damage to the anal sphincter muscles in both patient groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Concentric resistance biofeedback training did not improve the anal sphincter muscle function or AI symptoms beyond traditional biofeedback training. Anal sphincter muscle damage may be an important factor that limits the success of biofeedback training.

Long-term anorectal function in rectal cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy and endorectal brachytherapy

AIM

The aim was to study anorectal function in long-term survivors after combined, curatively intended, chemoradiotherapy and endorectal brachytherapy for low rectal cancer.

METHODS

This was a case-control design. We compared anorectal function by anal manometry, anal functional lumen imaging probe (EndoFLIP) and rectal bag distension in rectal cancer patients (RCPs) and healthy, normal subjects (NSs). Symptoms were assessed by the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) and Wexner faecal incontinence scores.

RESULTS

Thirteen RCPs (12 men, median age 68 years, range 52-92) after 60 Gy radiotherapy, 5 Gy endorectal brachytherapy and oral tegafur-uracil with complete clinical response (median time since treatment 2.8 years, range 2.2-5.6) were compared to 15 NSs (14 men, median age 64 years, range 47-75). RCPs had lower than normal anal resting pressure, 38.6 mmHg (range 8.8-67.7) versus 58.8 mmHg (25.7-105.2) (P < 0.003), and squeeze pressure, 117 mmHg (55.2-203) versus 188 mmHg (103-248) (P < 0.01). Squeeze-induced pressure increase recorded by EndoFLIP was also lower in RCPs (q > 7.56, P < 0.001) as was the anal canal resistance to increasing distension (q = 3.13, P < 0.05). No differences in median rectal volume at first sensation (72 [22-158] vs. 82 [36-190] ml, P = 0.4) or at urge to defaecate (107 [42-227] vs. 132 [59-334] ml, P = 0.2) were found. However, maximum tolerable rectal volume was lower in RCPs (145 [59-319] vs. 222 [106-447] ml, P < 0.02). The median (range) low anterior resection syndrome score was 27 (0-39) for RCPs and 7 (0-23) for NSs (P < 0.001), while the Wexner score was 0 (0-5) versus 0 (0-4) (P = 0.56).

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapy combined with endorectal brachytherapy for rectal cancer causes long-term anorectal symptoms, impaired anal sphincter function and reduced rectal capacity.

Mechanophysiological analysis of anorectal function using simulated feces in human subjects

INTRODUCTION

Defecation is a complex process that is difficult to study and analyze.

OBJECTIVES

Here, we present new analytical tools to calculate frictional force and tension during expulsion of the Fecobionics simulated stool in human subjects.

METHODS

The 12-cm-long Fecobionics device contained pressure sensors, motion processor units for measurement of orientation and bending, and impedance rings for measurement of cross-sectional areas. Eight normal subjects defecated Fecobionics. The bending angle of the device, frictional force between the device and the surrounding tissue, and the stretch tensions were calculated.

RESULTS

The bending angle and pressures changed during expulsion with the maximum pressure recorded at the rear. The averaged circumferential tension, longitudinal tension and friction force in each subject were associated with the front-rear pressure difference (r > 0.7, p < 0.005). The peak circumferential tension, longitudinal tension, and friction force immediately before expulsion of the rear were significantly higher compared to when the front entered the anal canal (F = 164.7, p < 0.005; F = 152.1, p < 0.005; F = 71.4, p < 0.005; respectively.).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that Fecobionics obtained reliable data under physiological conditions. Mechanical features such as frictional force and stretch tensions were assessable during Fecobionics expulsion.

A missing distal complex of the external and internal anal sphincters: a macroscopic and histologic study using Japanese and German elderly cadavers

The lower margin of the internal anal sphincter (IAS) is considered to lie on a J-shaped, subcutaneous part (SCP) of the external anal sphincter (EAS). The lower IAS is united with the J-shaped SCP to form a smooth-striated muscle complex. In the first part of this study, we ensured the presence of the J-shaped EAS in the lateral wall of the anal canal from 12 near-term fetuses. Second, in the lateral anal wall, the examination of the longitudinal section from 20 male and 24 female Japanese cadavers (72-95 years-old) demonstrated that the J-shaped EAS was lost in 15 (34%) due to the very small SCP. Third, we demonstrated that the J-shaped EAS was restricted in the latera anal wall using longitudinal histological sections of the anal canal from 11 male Japanese cadavers (75-89 years-old). Therefore, a site-dependent difference in the IAS-EAS configuration was evident. Finally, we compared a frequency of the lost J-shape between human populations using 10 mm-thick frontal slices from 36 Japanese and 28 German cadavers. The two groups of cadavers were compatible in age (a 0.2-years' difference in males). The macroscopic observations revealed that the J-shaped EAS was absent from 13 (36%) Japanese and six (20%) German specimens, suggesting that the SCP degeneration occurred more frequent in elderly Japanese than elderly German individuals (p < 0.05). The distal IAS-EAS complex seemed to push residual feces out of the anal canal at a transient phase from evacuation to closure. The absence might be the first sigh of anal dysfunction.

The use of impedance planimetry (Endoscopic Functional Lumen Imaging Probe, EndoFLIP® ) in the gastrointestinal tract: A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The EndoFLIP® system is a method of delineating impedance and was first designed to investigate the characteristics of the esophago-gastric junction. In the last decade, its use was widened to investigate other sphincteric and non-sphincteric systems of the gastrointestinal tract. The objective of the present systematic review was to summarize the available data in literature on the use of the EndoFLIP® system in the gastrointestinal tract, including sphincteric and non-sphincteric regions. We performed a systematic review in accordance with recommendations for systematic review using PRISMA guidelines without date restriction, until June 2020, using MEDLINE-PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases. Only articles written in English were included in the present review. Five hundred and six unique citations were identified from all database combined. Of those, 95 met the inclusion criteria. There was a lack of standardization among studies in terms of anesthetic drugs use, probe placement, and inflation protocol. In most cases, only small cohorts of patients were included. Most studies investigated the EGJ, with a potential use of the EndoFLIP® to identify a subgroup of patients with achalasia and for intraoperative assessment of treatment efficacy in achalasia. However, the use of EndoFLIP® in the esophageal body (esophageal panometry), other esophageal diseases (gastro-esophageal reflux disease, eosinophilic esophagitis), and other sphincter regions (anal canal, pylorus) will need further confirmatory studies. The EndoFLIP® system provides detailed geometric data of the gastrointestinal lumen but further works are needed to determine its use in clinical practice.

Esophageal Functional Lumen Imaging Probe (FLIP): How Can FLIP Enhance Your Clinical Practice?

Recent innovations in esophageal diagnostic testing have enhanced gastroenterology clinical practice by facilitating more nuanced and advanced evaluation of esophageal symptoms. Among these pivotal advances is the FDA-approved functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP), which utilizes impedance planimetry via volumetric distension of a catheter-mounted balloon at the time of sedated upper endoscopy, to acquire esophageal dimensions and pressures. In real time, FLIP can display cross-sectional areas (CSA) and distensibility indices (ratios of CSA to intra-balloon pressures) throughout the esophagus, most notably at the esophagogastric junction, as well as secondary peristaltic esophageal body contractile patterns. As the use of FLIP has progressively spread and permeated into the practice of clinical gastroenterology since its introduction, increasing data on and experiences with its applications have accumulated to guide its utility in clinical practice. In this current review developed for gastroenterologists and foregut surgeons across clinical practice, we provide an introduction to FLIP technology and metrics and discuss the clinical scenarios in which performance of or referral for FLIP may be helpful in the evaluation and management of patients with commonly encountered esophageal symptoms and disorders. Specifically, we discuss the potential applications and limitations of FLIP as a complementary diagnostic modality in patients with non-obstructive dysphagia, established or suspected achalasia spectrum disorders, eosinophilic esophagitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease and those undergoing esophageal surgery.

Loop analysis of the anal sphincter complex in fecal incontinent patients using functional luminal imaging probe

Cardiac loops have been used extensively to study myocardial function. With changes in cardiac pump function, loops are shifted to the right or left. Functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) recordings allow for loop analysis of the anal sphincter and puborectalis muscle (PRM) function. The goal was to characterize anal sphincter area-pressure/tension loop changes in fecal incontinence (FI) patients. Fourteen healthy subjects and 14 patients with FI were studied. A custom-designed FLIP was placed in the vagina and then in the anal canal, and deflated in 20-ml steps, from 90 to 30 ml. At each volume, subjects performed maximal voluntary squeezes. Area-pressure (AP) and area-tension (AT) loops were generated for each squeeze cycle. Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of the anal sphincter and PRM were obtained to determine the relationship between anal sphincter muscle damage and loop movements. With the increase in bag volume, AP loops and AT loops shifted to the right and upward in normal subjects (both anal and vaginal). The shift to the right was greater, and the upward movement was less in FI patients. The difference in the location of AP loops and AT loops was statistically significant at volumes of 50 ml to 90 ml (P < 0.05). A similar pattern was found in the vaginal loops. There is a significant relationship between the damage to the anal sphincter and PRM, and loop location of FI patients. We propose AP and AT loops as novel ways to assess the anal sphincter and PRM function. Such loops can be generated by real-time measurement of pressure and area within the anal canal.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We describe the use of area-pressure (AP) and area-tension (AT)-loop analysis of the anal sphincters and puborectalis muscles in normal subjects and fecal incontinent patients using the functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP). There are differences in the magnitude of the displacement of the loops with increase in the FLIP bag volume between normal subjects and patients with fecal incontinence. The latter group shifts more to the right in AP and AT space.

Functional lumen imaging probe in gastrointestinal motility diseases

Dysfunction of gastrointestinal (GI) sphincters, including the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) at the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) and the pyloric sphincter, plays a vital role in GI motility disorders, such as achalasia, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), gastroparesis, and fecal incontinence. Using multi-detector high-resolution impedance planimetry, the functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) system measures simultaneous data on tissue distensibility and luminal geometry changes in the sphincter in a real-time manner. In this review we focus on the emerging data on FLIP, which can be used as an innovative diagnostic method during endoscopic or surgical procedures in GI motility disorders. Subsequent large, prospective, standardizing studies are needed to validate these findings before it can be put to routine clinical use.

Theoretical tools to analyze anorectal mechanophysiological data generated by the Fecobionics device

A mechanical approach is needed for understanding anorectal function and defecation. Fecal continence is achieved by several interacting mechanisms including anatomical factors, anorectal sensation, rectal compliance, stool consistency, anal muscle strength, motility, and psychological factors. The balance is easily disturbed, resulting in symptoms such as fecal incontinence and constipation. Novel technologies have been developed in recent years for studying anorectal function. Especially the Fecobionics device, a simulated feces, has gained attention recently. This facilitates new analysis of anorectal mechanical function. In this study a theoretical model is developed to analyze anorectal mechanophysiological data generated by the Fecobionics device. Theoretical approaches can enhance future interdisciplinary research for unraveling defecatory function, sensory-motor disorders and symptoms. This is a step in the direction of personalized treatment for gastrointestinal disorders based on optimized subtyping of anorectal disorders.

The biomechanical properties of the urethra in boys with hypospadias: a preliminary study

PURPOSE

The ventral aspect of the penis in boys with hypospadias is composed of dysplastic tissue of the skin and the urethra. The aim of this study was to assess the pre-operative size and biomechanical properties of urethrae in boys with and without hypospadias using a more objective catheter-based system.

MATERIALS & METHODS

In this non-blinded clinical observation study, the study population consisted of 19 boys with hypospadias-the case group (median age 13.9 months [range: 12.2-21.3])-and seven boys without hypospadias-the control group (median age 8.5 months [range: 3.8-18.1]). Modified measurements of impedance were used to assess the size, compliance and viscoelasticity of the urethrae under stepwise increased pressures (between 0, 40 and 60 cmH₂O) using a customised Endolumenal Functional Lumen Imaging probe (EndoFLIP®).

RESULTS

The sizes of the urethrae in boys with hypospadias are variable but tend towards being narrower and less compliant than those of the control subjects i.e. median diameter for meatus urethra was 3.2 mm (range: 2.98-3.92) in the hypospadias group compared with 3.64 (range: 3.22-4.44) in the control group at 40 cmH₂O, and the median change in diameter at meatus urethra was 0.08 mm (range: -0.02 to 0.52) in the hypospadias group compared with 0.23 mm (range: -0.02 to 0.34) when the pressure was increased from 40 to 60 cmH₂O. This biomechanical analysis found that there was no significant viscoelasticity of the urethral meatus in both the groups, whereas the remainder of the urethral structure generally had viscoelastic properties in the control group, seen as a creep on the time/diameter curves (Figure). In the group of boys with hypospadias, evaluations of the urethrae revealed varying viscoelastic abilities, ranging from abilities that were comparable with those of the control subjects to no sign of viscoelasticity at all.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to measure the biomechanical properties of the urethra in children, which might help to provide an understanding as to the structural and functional changes associated with hypospadias. The urethrae in the subjects with hypospadias were variable in diameter but tended to be narrower overall, especially in the distal portion of the urethra. Furthermore, the urethrae in boys with hypospadias were frequently less viscoelastic than those of controls.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The EndoFLIP® system may be a future way of objectively estimating the severity of a urethral obstruction and could potentially be included in the postoperative assessment of patients with signs of hampered voiding.

Endoflip vs high-definition manometry in the assessment of fecal incontinence: A data-driven unsupervised comparison

BACKGROUND

How much anal sphincter dysfunction contributes to fecal incontinence (FI) is not clear. High-definition anorectal manometry (HDAM) and functional luminal imaging probe (Endoflip) are two new techniques to study anal sphincter function.

AIMS

The goal was to compare the diagnostic utility of HDAM and Endoflip using optimal feature(s) in each modality for FI diagnosis.

METHODS

Blinded classification was carried out on 70 female subjects (32 FI & 38 controls), using 3 prominent machine-learning clustering techniques, with 3 distance metrics. For HDAM, descriptive statistics, shape, and textural features characterizing the spatial relationship of pixels in the HDAM high-pressure zone, and for Endoflip, permutations of pressure and CSA combinations (ie, multiplication, division, or individually) at rest and squeeze were tested.

RESULTS

Intramodality: (a) Endoflip: Best clustering was obtained using the combination of the ratio of CSA over pressure at 40 and 50 mL at rest, which had significantly better specificity (P < 0.001) than using only pressure at 50 mL, no difference in sensitivity (P = 0.68). (b) HDAM: clustering using textural information at rest had significantly higher specificity compared to using only the maximal pressure at rest (P < 0.001). Intermodality: Clustering results using optimal features were not significantly different with respect to sensitivity or specificity (P > 0.05). Optimal Endoflip feature set differed significantly in specificity compared to HDAM maximal pressure at both rest (P < 0.001) and squeeze (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Defective anal closure function is fairly sensitive and highly specific in diagnosing FI. Using optimal feature sets, HDAM and Endoflip perform in a similar fashion in diagnosing FI, but are not complementary.

Measuring length-tension function of the anal sphincters and puborectalis muscle using the functional luminal imaging probe

The functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) has been used to measure the distensibility of the anal canal. We hypothesized that with increasing distension of the anal canal with FLIP there will be an increase in length of the anal sphincter muscle allowing measurement of the length-tension function of anal sphincter and puborectalis muscles (PRM). We studied 14 healthy nulliparous women. A custom-designed FLIP bag (30-mm diameter) was placed in the vagina and then in the anal canal, distended in 10-ml steps with volumes ranging from 30 to 90 ml. At each volume, subject performed maximal voluntary squeezes. Length-tension measurements were also made with a manometric probe system. Tension was calculated (pressure × radius) in Newtons per meter using a custom software program. Peak tensions at different FLIP volumes were compared with the manometric data. No change in the luminal CSA was noted at low fluid volumes; the sphincter muscles were able to fully collapse the FLIP bag within the anal canal/vagina even at rest. At larger volumes, with each squeeze there was an increase in the bag pressure and reduction in the cross-sectional area, which represents concentric contraction of the muscle. Both rest and squeeze tension increased with the increase in volume in the anal as well as vaginal canal indicating that the external anal sphincter and puborectalis muscles produce more tension when lengthened. FLIP device, which has been used to describe the distensibility of the anal canal can also provide information on the length-tension function of the anal sphincters and PRM. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) has been used to describe the distensibility of the anal canal. This report is the first to describe the use of the FLIP in the vaginal canal and the anal canal to provide information on the length-tension function of the anal sphincter and puborectalis muscles, which may provide clinicians with additional information regarding the active components of muscle contraction involved in the anal closure function.

Fecobionics: A Novel Bionics Device for Studying Defecation

During defecation, solid, semisolid or liquid stools are eliminated via the anus in a complex physiological process. Up to 25% of the population are affected by anorectal disorders that are poorly recognized and treated. We developed a new bionics device, a simulated stool named Fecobionics, to replace several current tests of anorectal function. Fecobionics was developed to simulate the defecation process that depends on rectal forces, the anorectal size angle, and anorectal size and sensitivity. Fecobionics provided axial pressure signatures, measurement of bending (anorectal angle) and geometric mapping in a single examination. It had the consistency and shape of normal stool. The device had a soft core with embedded electronics and a bag for distension. The paper describes the device development and validation. Furthermore, data were obtained in preliminary experiments in pigs, healthy human subjects and patients with focus on four important features of the system, i.e. measurements of pressure signatures, bending characteristics, impedance measurements and data transmission. Accurate pressure and orientation data as well as geometric profiles were successfully obtained on the bench as well as in vivo in pigs and human subjects during defecation. Fecobionics is a novel technology imitating defecation. The clinical future ultimately depends on its ability to impact on daily treatment of anorectal disorders. A potential long-term clinical application is use of the device for biofeedback training for dyssynergic defecation.

The diagnostic value of the functional lumen imaging probe versus high-resolution anorectal manometry in patients with fecal incontinence

BACKGROUND

The functional lumen imaging probe (EndoFLIP^® ) is a new technology that measures the distensibility of the anal canal represented by the anal distensibility index. The aims of this study were (i) to compare the anal distensibility index to anal pressure in a cohort of patients with fecal incontinence (FI) and (ii) to compare the diagnostic value of the EndoFLIP^® to that of high-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) in the same cohort of patients.

METHODS

Eighty-three consecutive patients with FI who underwent EndoFLIP^® and HRAM assessments were enrolled. The diagnostic value of the EndoFLIP^® was compared to that of HRAM and agreement between EndoFLIP^® and HRAM data was assessed.

KEY RESULTS

More than 70% of the patients diagnosed with anal deficiency at rest and/or during voluntary contractions by HRAM had the same diagnosis using the EndoFLIP^® . Two patients with higher distensibility indexes at rest had normal anal resting pressures. Sixteen patients with a normal EndoFLIP^® index (ie, normal distensibility index at rest and during voluntary contractions) had an abnormal HRAM result. Seven of these 16 patients (44%) had no sphincter lesion or neuropathic disorder that could explain an abnormal anal sphincter function.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

We demonstrated that the anal distensibility index and HRAM results are largely in agreement. We did, however, identify several discrepancies between the two techniques, indicating that they may be complementary.

Expert consensus document: Advances in the evaluation of anorectal function

Faecal incontinence and evacuation disorders are common, impair quality of life and incur substantial economic costs worldwide. As symptoms alone are poor predictors of underlying pathophysiology and aetiology, diagnostic tests of anorectal function could facilitate patient management in those cases that are refractory to conservative therapies. In the past decade, several major technological advances have improved our understanding of anorectal structure, coordination and sensorimotor function. This Consensus Statement provides the reader with an appraisal of the current indications, study performance characteristics, clinical utility, strengths and limitations of the most widely available tests of anorectal structure (ultrasonography and MRI) and function (anorectal manometry, neurophysiological investigations, rectal distension techniques and tests of evacuation, including defecography). Additionally, this article provides our consensus on the clinical relevance of these tests.

Axial Movements and Length Changes of the Human Lower Esophageal Sphincter During Respiration and Distension-induced Secondary Peristalsis Using Functional Luminal Imaging Probe

Background/Aims

Efficient transport through the esophago-gastric junction (EGJ) requires synchronized circular and longitudinal muscle contraction of the esophagus including relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). However, there is a scarcity of technology for measuring esophagus movements in the longitudinal (axial) direction. The aim of this study is to develop new analytical tools for dynamic evaluation of the length change and axial movement of the human LES based on the functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) technology and to present normal signatures for the selected parameters.

Methods

Six healthy volunteers without hiatal hernia were included. Data were analyzed from stepwise LES distensions at 20, 30, and 40 mL bag volumes. The bag pressure and the diameter change were used for motion analysis in the LES. The cyclic bag pressure frequency was used to distinguish dynamic changes of the LES induced by respiration and secondary peristalsis.

Results

Cyclic fluctuations of the LES were evoked by respiration and isovolumetric distension, with phasic changes of bag pressure, diameter, length, and axial movement of the LES narrow zone. Compared to the respiration-induced LES fluctuations, peristaltic contractions increased the contraction pressure amplitude (P < 0.001), shortening (P < 0.001), axial movement (P < 0.001), and diameter change (P < 0.01) of the narrow zone. The length of the narrow zone shortened as function of the pressure increase.

Conclusions

FLIP can be used for evaluation of dynamic length changes and axial movement of the human LES. The method may shed light on abnormal longitudinal muscle activity in esophageal disorders.

What Is the Future of Impedance Planimetry in Gastroenterology?

The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is efficient in transporting ingested material to the site of delivery in healthy subjects. A fine balance exists between peristaltic forces, the mixing and delivery of the contents, and sensory signaling. This fine balance is easily disturbed by diseases. It is mandatory to understand the pathophysiology to enhance our understanding of GI disorders. The inaccessibility and complex nervous innervation, geometry and mechanical function of the GI tract make mechanosensory evaluation difficult. Impedance planimetry is a distension technology that assesses luminal geometry, mechanical properties including muscle dynamics, and processing of nociceptive signals from the GI tract. Since standardized models do not exist for GI muscle function in vivo, models, concepts, and terminology must be borrowed from other medical fields such as cardiac mechanophysiology. The review highlights the impedance planimetric technology, muscle dynamics assessment, and 3 applied technologies of impedance planimetry. These technologies are the multimodal probes that assesses sensory function, the functional luminal imaging probe that dynamically measures the geometry of the lumen it distends, and Fecobionics that is a simulated feces providing high-resolution measurements during defecation. The advanced muscle analysis and 3 applied technologies can enhance the quality of future interdisciplinary research for gaining more knowledge about mechanical function, sensory-motor disorders, and symptoms. This is a step in the direction of individualized treatment for GI disorders based on diagnostic subtyping. There seems to be no better alternatives to impedance planimetry, but only the functional luminal imaging probe is currently commercially available. Wider use depends on commercialization of the multimodal probe and Fecobionics.

Anal sphincter dysfunction in patients treated with primary radiotherapy for anal cancer: a study with the functional lumen imaging probe

BACKGROUND

Sphincter-sparing radiotherapy or chemoradiation are standard treatments for patients with anal cancer. The ultimate treatment goal is full recovery from anal cancer with preserved anorectal function. Unfortunately, long-term survivors often suffer from severe anorectal symptoms. The aim of the present study was to characterize changes in anorectal physiology after radiotherapy for anal cancer.

METHOD

We included 13 patients (10 women, age 63.4 ± 1.9) treated with radiotherapy or chemoradiation for anal cancer and 14 healthy volunteers (9 women, age 61.4 ± 1.5). Symptoms were assessed with scores for fecal incontinence and low anterior resection syndrome. Anorectal physiology was examined with anorectal manometry and the Functional Lumen Imaging Probe.

RESULTS

Patients had a median Wexner fecal incontinence score of 5 (0-13) and a median LARS score of 29 (0-39). Compared to healthy volunteers, patients had lower mean (±SE) anal -resting (38 ± 5 vs. 71 ± 6, p < .001) and -squeeze pressures (76 ± 11 vs. 165 ± 15, p < .001). Patients also had lower anal yield pressure (15.5 ± 1.3 mmHg vs. 28.0 ± 2.0 mmHg, p < .001), higher distensibility, and lower resistance to flow (reduced resistance ratio of the anal canal during distension, q = 5.09, p < .001). No differences were found in median (range) rectal volumes at first sensation (70.5 (15-131) vs. 57 (18-132) ml, p > .4), urge (103 (54-176) vs. 90 (32-212), p > .6) or maximum tolerable volume (173 (86-413) vs. 119.5 (54-269) ml, p > .10).

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with radiotherapy or chemoradiation for anal cancer have low anal resting and squeeze pressures as well as reduced resistance to distension and flow.

Anatomy and mechanical properties of the anal sphincter muscles in healthy senior volunteers

BACKGROUND

A large proportion of age-related fecal incontinence is attributed to weakness or degeneration of the muscles composing the anal continence organ. However, the individual role of these muscles and their functional interplay remain poorly understood.

METHODS

This study employs a novel technique based on the combination of MR imaging and FLIP measurements (MR-FLIP) to obtain anatomical and mechanical information simultaneously. Unlike previous methods used to assess the mechanics of the continence organ, MR-FLIP allows inter-individual comparisons and statistical analysis of the sphincter morpho-mechanical parameters. The anatomy as well as voluntary and involuntary mechanical properties of the anal continence organ were characterized in 20 healthy senior volunteers.

RESULTS

Results showed that the external anal sphincter (EAS) forms a funnel-like shape with wall thickness increasing by a factor of 2.5 from distal (6 ± 0 mm) to proximal (15 ± 3 mm). Both voluntary and involuntary mechanical properties in this region correlate strongly with the thickness of the muscle. The positions of least compliance and maximal orifice closing were both located toward the proximal EAS end. In addition, maximal contraction during squeeze maneuvers was reached after 2 s, but high muscle fatigue was measured during a 7 s holding phase, corresponding to about 60% loss of the energy produced by the muscles during the contraction phase.

CONCLUSIONS

This work reports baseline parameters describing the morpho-mechanical condition of the sphincter muscle of healthy elderly volunteers. New parameters were also proposed to quantify the active properties of the muscles based on the mechanical energy associated with muscle contraction and fatigue. This information could be used to assess patients suffering from AI or for the design of novel implants.

The impact of naloxegol on anal sphincter function - Using a human experimental model of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Opioid treatment interferes with anal sphincter function and its regulation during defecation. This may result in straining, incomplete evacuation, and contribute to opioid-induced bowel dysfunction (OIBD). Employing an experimental model of oxycodone-induced OIBD, we hypothesized that co-administration of the peripherally acting μ-opioid antagonist naloxegol would improve anal sphincter function in comparison to placebo.

METHODS

In a double-blind randomized crossover trial, 24 healthy males were assigned to a six-day treatment of oral oxycodone 15 mg twice daily in combination with either oral naloxegol 25 mg once daily or placebo. At baseline and at day 6, anal resting pressure and the recto-anal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) were evaluated using manometry and rectal balloon distension. Furthermore, the functional lumen imaging probe was used to measure distensibility of the anal canal. Gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed with the Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptom (PAC-SYM) questionnaire and the Bristol Stool Form Scale.

RESULTS

During oxycodone treatment, naloxegol improved RAIR-induced sphincter relaxation by 15% (-45.9 vs -38.8 mm Hg; P < 0.01). No differences in anal resting pressure and anal canal distensibility were found between treatments (all P > 0.5). Naloxegol improved PAC-SYM symptoms (mean score over days; 2.6 vs 4.5, P < 0.001) and improved stool consistency scores (mean score over days; 3.3 vs 2.9, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In this experimental model of OIBD, naloxegol improved the RAIR and reduced gastrointestinal symptoms. Hence, in contrast to conventional laxatives, naloxegol may regulate opioid-induced anal sphincter dysfunction and facilitate the defecation process.

A biomechanical model of the human defecatory system to investigate mechanisms of continence

This article presents a method to fabricate, measure and control a physical simulation of the human defecatory system to investigate individual and combined effects of anorectal angle and sphincter pressure on continence. To illustrate the capabilities and clinical relevance of the work, the influence of a passive-assistive artificial anal sphincter (FENIX^TM) is evaluated. A model rectum and associated soft tissues, based on geometry from an anonymised computed tomography dataset, was fabricated from silicone and showed behavioural realism to the biological system and ex vivo tissue. Simulated stool matter with similar rheological properties to human faeces was developed. Instrumentation and control hardware were used to regulate injection of simulated stool into the system, automate balloon catheter movement through the anal canal, define the anorectal angle and monitor stool flow rate, intra-rectal pressure, anal canal pressure and puborectalis force. Studies were conducted to examine the response of anorectal angles at 80°, 90° and 100° with simulated stool. Tests were then repeated with the inclusion of a FENIX device. Stool leakage was reduced as the anorectal angle became more acute. Conversely, intra-rectal pressure increased. Overall inclusion of the FENIX reduced faecal leakage, while combined effects of the FENIX and an acute anorectal angle showed the greatest resistance to faecal leakage. These data demonstrate that the anorectal angle and sphincter pressure are fundamental in maintaining continence. Furthermore, it demonstrates that use of the FENIX can increase resistance to faecal leakage and reduce anorectal angles required to maintain continence. Physical simulation of the defecatory system is an insightful tool to better understand, in a quantitative manner, the effects of the anorectal angle and sphincter pressure on continence. This work is valuable in helping improve our understanding of the physical behaviour of the continence mechanism and facilitating improved technologies to treat severe faecal incontinence.

Prolonged-Release Oxycodone/Naloxone Improves Anal Sphincter Relaxation Compared to Oxycodone Plus Macrogol 3350

BACKGROUND

Opioid analgesics inhibit anal sphincter function and contribute to opioid-induced bowel dysfunction (OIBD). However, it is unknown whether the inhibition can be reduced by opioid antagonism with prolonged-release (PR) naloxone and how this compares to laxative treatment.

AIMS

To compare the effects of combined PR oxycodone/naloxone or PR oxycodone plus macrogol 3350 on anal sphincter function and gastrointestinal symptoms.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, crossover trial was conducted in 20 healthy men. Participants were treated for 5 days with combined PR oxycodone/naloxone or PR oxycodone plus macrogol 3350. Resting anal pressure, anal canal distensibility, and relaxation of the internal sphincter to rectal distension were evaluated before treatment (baseline) and on day 5. The Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptom (PAC-SYM) questionnaire, stool frequency, and stool consistency were assessed daily.

RESULTS

Both PR oxycodone/naloxone and PR oxycodone plus macrogol treatment decreased sphincter relaxation compared to baseline (- 27.5%; P < 0.001 and - 14.7%; P = 0.01). However, sphincter relaxation was increased after PR naloxone/oxycodone treatment compared to macrogol (difference = + 17.6%; P < 0.001). Resting anal pressure and anal canal distensibility did not differ between treatments. PAC-SYM abdominal symptoms score was lower during PR naloxone compared to macrogol (0.2 vs. 3.2; P = 0.002). The number of bowel movements was lower during PR naloxone versus macrogol (4.2 vs. 5.4; P = 0.035).

CONCLUSION

Relaxation of the internal anal sphincter was significantly better after PR oxycodone/naloxone treatment compared to PR oxycodone plus macrogol 3350. These findings highlight that OIBD may require specific therapy against the complex, pan-intestinal effects of opioids.

MR-FLIP: a new method that combines a functional lumen imaging probe with anatomical information for spatial compliance assessment of the anal sphincter muscles

AIM

Continence results from a complex interplay between anal canal (AC) muscles and sensorimotor feedback mechanisms. The passive ability of the AC to withstand opening pressure - its compliance - has recently been shown to correlate with continence. A functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) is used to assess AC compliance, although it provides no anatomical information. Therefore, assessment of the compliance specific anatomical structures has not been possible, and the anatomical position of critical functional zones remains unknown. In addition, the FLIP technique assumes a circular orifice cross-section, which has not been shown for the AC. To address these shortcomings, a technique combining FLIP with a medical imaging modality is needed.

METHOD

We implemented a new research method (MR-FLIP) that combines FLIP with MR imaging. Twenty healthy volunteers underwent MR-FLIP and conventional FLIP assessment. MR-FLIP was validated by comparison with FLIP results. Anatomical markers were identified, and the cross-sectional shape of the orifice was investigated.

RESULTS

MR-FLIP provides compliance measurements identical to those obtained by conventional FLIP. Anatomical analysis revealed that the least compliant AC zone was located at the proximal end of the external anal sphincter (EAS). The cross-sectional shape of the AC was found to deviate only slightly from circularity in healthy volunteers.

CONCLUSION

The proposed method is equivalent to classical FLIP. It establishes for the first time direct mapping between local tissue compliance and anatomical structure, which is key to gaining novel insights into (in)continence. In addition, MR-FLIP provides a tool for better understanding conventional FLIP measurements in the AC by quantifying its limitations and assumptions.

Esophagogastric junction in systemic sclerosis: A study with the functional lumen imaging probe

BACKGROUND

Fibrosis and atrophy of esophageal smooth muscle cells cause gastro-esophageal reflux and dysphagia in most patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). Recent studies indicate that distensibility of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ), assessed with the Functional Lumen Imaging Probe (FLIP) may be a more sensitive and accurate measure of sphincter function than manometry. We aim to describe and compare distension parameters of the EGJ in a well-characterized group of patients with SSc.

METHOD

Twelve patients with SSc reporting reflux or dysphagia (11 women, median age 53 [range 35-72], duration of disease: 1-20 years) were investigated using distensibility testing of the EGJ. Patients were compared with 11 healthy volunteers (HV) (10 women, median age 53 [range 40-68]). The pressure and minimum diameter along the EGJ during ramp distension were used for distensibility analysis.

KEY RESULTS

Patients with SSc had significantly lower EGJ yield pressure (median: 4.0 mm Hg [Inter Quartile Range (IQR): 2.8-7.7]) than HV (median: 6.2 mm Hg [IQR: 9.4-26]) (P=.007). Likewise, the pressure-strain elastic modulus was lower in SSc patients (median 1.73 kPa [IQR: 1.16-2.15]) than in HV (median 2.41 kPa [IQR: 1.85-2.67]) (P=.03), indicating the reduced resistance to distension in SSc patient.

CONCLUSION & INFERENCES

Patients with SSc and symptoms of reflux and dysphagia have significantly reduced resistance to distension of the EGJ.

Functional Lumen Imaging Probe for the Management of Esophageal Disorders: Expert Review From the Clinical Practice Updates Committee of the AGA Institute

The functional luminal imaging probe is a Food and Drug Administration-approved measurement tool used to measure simultaneous pressure and diameter to guide management of various upper gastrointestinal disorders. Additionally, this tool is also approved to guide therapy during bariatric procedures and specialized esophageal surgery. Although it has been commercially available since 2009 as the endolumenal functional lumen imaging probe (EndoFLIP), the functional luminal imaging probe has had limited penetrance into clinical settings outside of specialized centers. This is primarily because of a paucity of data supporting its utility in general practice and a lack of standardized protocols and data analysis methodology. However, data are accumulating that are providing guidance regarding emerging applications in the evaluation and management of foregut disorders. This clinical practice update describes the technique and reviews potential indications in achalasia, eosinophilic esophagitis, and gastroesophgeal reflux disease. Best Practice Advice 1: Clinicians should not make a diagnosis or treatment decision based on functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) assessment alone. Best Practice Advice 2: FLIP assessment is a complementary tool to assess esophagogastric junction opening dynamics and the stiffness of the esophageal wall. Best Practice Advice 3: Utilization should follow distinct protocols and analysis paradigms based on the disease state of interest. Best Practice Advice 4: Clinicians should not utilize FLIP in routine diagnostic assessments of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Best Practice Advice 5: FLIP should not be used to diagnose eosinophilic esophagitis but may have a role in severity assessment and therapeutic monitoring.

Increased yield pressure in the anal canal during sacral nerve stimulation: a pilot study with the functional lumen imaging probe

BACKGROUND

Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is a well-established treatment for fecal incontinence but its mode of action remains obscure. Anal sphincter function is usually evaluated with manometry but resistance to distension may be a more appropriate parameter than luminal pressure. The functional lumen imaging probe allows detailed description of distension properties of the anal canal. Our objective in this study was to characterize the impact of SNS on distension properties of the anal canal in patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence.

METHODS

We studied 10 women (median age 64 [44-79] years) with idiopathic fecal incontinence at baseline and during SNS. The luminal geometry of the anal canal was examined with the FLIP at rest and during squeeze and the distensibility of the anal canal was investigated during filling of the bag.

KEY RESULTS

All patients were successfully treated with SNS and the mean Wexner Incontinence Score was reduced from 14.9 ± 4 to 7.1 ± 4.8 (P<.001). The pressure required to open the narrowest point of the anal canal during distension (yield pressure) increased from 14.5 ± 12.2 mmHg at baseline to 20.5 ± 13.3 mmHg during SNS (P<.01). The pressure-strain elastic modulus increased non-significantly from 2.2 ± 0.5 to 2.9 ± 1.6 kPa, indicating increased stiffness of the anal canal.

CONCLUSION AND INFERENCES

The yield pressure and the resistance to distension increased in response to SNS for idiopathic fecal incontinence. This will inevitably increase the resistance to flow through the anal canal, which may contribute to the benefits of sacral nerve stimulation.

Internal anal sphincter: Clinical perspective

OBJECTIVE

To summarise current knowledge of Internal anal sphincter.

BACKGROUND

The internal anal sphincter (IAS) is the involuntary ring of smooth muscle in the anal canal and is the major contributor to the resting pressure in the anus. Structural injury or functional weakness of the muscle results in passive incontinence of faeces and flatus. With advent of new assessment and treatment modalities IAS has become an important topic for surgeons. This review was undertaken to summarise our current knowledge of internal anal sphincter and highlight the areas that need further research.

METHOD

The PubMed database was used to identify relevant studies relating to internal anal sphincter.

RESULTS

The available evidence has been summarised and advantages and limitations highlighted for the different diagnostic and therapeutic techniques.

CONCLUSION

Our understanding of the physiology and pharmacology of IAS has increased greatly in the last three decades. Additionally, there has been a rise in diagnostic and therapeutic techniques specifically targeting the IAS. Although these are promising, future research is required before these can be incorporated into the management algorithm.

Do endoflip assessments of anal sphincter distensibility provide more information on patients with fecal incontinence than high-resolution anal manometry?

BACKGROUND

Anal manometry is the standard technique for evaluating anal sphincter function. However, the functional lumen imaging probe (EndoFLIP(®) ) can be used to measure sphincter distensibility during volume-controlled distensions. Our aims were (i) to assess anal distensibility in patients with fecal incontinence (FI) and in healthy subjects using the EndoFLIP(®) and (ii) to compare the results with anal pressures measured by 3D high-resolution manometry (3D-HRM) to determine whether the EndoFLIP(®) was more sensitive and specific for diagnosing FI than 3D-HRM.

METHODS

EndoFLIP(®) and 3D-HRM assessments of 34 female FI patients and 40 healthy female subjects were performed. Anal distensibility was measured as the median cross-sectional area at the narrowest point divided by the corresponding intra-bag pressure at rest and during peak voluntary contraction and was expressed in mm(2) /mmHg.

KEY RESULTS

A 40-mL anal distensibility index was selected for further comparisons as it provided the best discrimination between the FI patients and the healthy subjects. The index was significantly higher in the FI patients than in the healthy subjects at rest (p = 1.10(-4) ) and during voluntary contraction (p = 1.10(-4) ). The index at rest and during voluntary contraction appeared to be more appropriate than anal pressures for discriminating between FI patients and healthy subjects.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

The present study confirmed that FI is associated with an abnormally high distensibility index at rest and during voluntary contraction. The ability of the distensibility index to discriminate between FI patients and healthy subjects was significantly better than anal pressure.

Management of patients with faecal incontinence

Faecal incontinence, defined as the involuntary loss of solid or liquid stool, is a common problem affecting 0.8-8.3% of the adult population. Individuals suffering from faecal incontinence often live a restricted life with reduced quality of life. The present paper is a clinically oriented review of the pathophysiology, evaluation and treatment of faecal incontinence. First-line therapy should be conservative and usually include dietary adjustments, fibre supplement, constipating agents or mini enemas. Biofeedback therapy to improve external anal sphincter function can be offered but the evidence for long-term effect is poor. There is good evidence that colonic irrigation can reduce symptoms and improve quality of life, especially in patients with neurogenic faecal incontinence. Surgical interventions should only be considered if conservative measures fail. Sacral nerve stimulation is a minimally invasive procedure with high rate of success. Advanced surgical procedures should be restricted to highly selected patients and only performed at specialist centres. A stoma should be considered if other treatment modalities fail.

Functional lumen imaging of the gastrointestinal tract

This nonsystematic review aims to describe recent developments in the use of functional lumen imaging in the gastrointestinal tract stimulated by the introduction of the functional lumen imaging probe. When ingested food in liquid and solid form is transported along the gastrointestinal tract, sphincters provide an important role in the flow and control of these contents. Inadequate function of sphincters is the basis of many gastrointestinal diseases. Despite this, traditional methods of sphincter diagnosis and measurement such as fluoroscopy, manometry, and the barostat are limited in what they can tell us. It has long been thought that measurement of sphincter function through resistance to distension is a better approach, now more commonly known as distensibility testing. The functional lumen imaging probe is the first medical measurement device that purports in a practical way to provide geometric profiling and measurement of distensibility in sphincters. With use of impedance planimetry, an axial series of cross-sectional areas and pressure in a catheter-mounted allantoid bag are used for the calculation of distensibility parameters. The technique has been trialed in many valvular areas of the gastrointestinal tract, including the upper esophageal sphincter, the esophagogastric junction, and the anorectal region. It has shown potential in the biomechanical assessment of sphincter function and characterization of swallowing disorders, gastroesophageal reflux disease, eosinophilic esophagitis, achalasia, and fecal incontinence. From this early work, the functional lumen imaging technique has the potential to contribute to a better and more physiological understanding of narrowing regions in the gastrointestinal tract in general and sphincters in particular.

Identification of biomechanical properties in vivo in human uterine cervix

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The course and outcome of pregnancy is closely correlated to change of biomechanical properties of the uterine cervix. The aim of this study was to build a non-linear, fiber reinforced mechanical model of the cervix for estimation of mechanical characteristics of the cervix in early- and term-pregnant women based on recordings of in vivo pressure and diameter by means of the Functional Luminal Imaging Probe (FLIP) technology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five early- and six term-pregnant women were examined with a FLIP probe. The bag on the probe was inserted into the cervical canal for concomitant measurement of diameters at 16 serial locations along the canal and the bag pressure. The bag was inflated to a maximum volume of 50 ml. A three-fiber-families model including isotropic elastin-dominated matrix and anisotropic collagen was introduced to describe the mechanical behavior of the cervical canal. The unknown geometric and mechanical parameters were calculated on the basis of the mid-cervical diameters and the intraluminal pressures during the inflation.

RESULTS

The wall thickness in the unloaded state (zero pressure applied) and mechanical properties of the matrix material (c) and collagens (c1, c2) were estimated with good fits of the calculated intraluminal pressures to the FLIP recordings during the cervical canal distension. No significant difference in the wall thickness was found between the early- and term-pregnant women (10.3 ± 0.8mm vs. 11.7 ± 2.2mm, p=0.30). The cervical matrix material and the collagen in the early-pregnant women were much stiffer than that in the term-pregnant women (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The cervical mechanical properties can be obtained from recorded pressure and diameter data in vivo via the established mechanical model. Matrix material and collagens of the cervix wall were remodeled during pregnancy. The mechanical model can be applied to other tubular visceral organs where concomitant measures of pressure and diameter can be obtained for better understanding diseases and their evolution or treatment.