Deciphering the fingerprint of disturbance on the three-dimensional structure of the world's forests

Innovations in plant science from integrative remote sensing research: an introduction to a Virtual Issue

This article is an Editorial to the Virtual issue on ‘Remote sensing’ that includes the following papers Chavana‐Bryant et al. (2017), Coupel‐Ledru et al. (2022), Cushman & Machado (2020), Disney (2019), D'Odorico et al. (2020), Dong et al. (2022), Fischer et al. (2019), Gamon et al. (2023), Gu et al. (2019), Guillemot et al. (2020), Jucker (2021), Koh et al. (2022), Konings et al. (2019), Kothari et al. (2023), Martini et al. (2022), Richardson (2019), Santini et al. (2021), Schimel et al. (2019), Serbin et al. (2019), Smith et al. (2019, 2020), Still et al. (2021), Stovall et al. (2021), Wang et al. (2020), Wong et al. (2020), Wu et al. (2021), Wu et al. (2017), Wu et al. (2018), Wu et al. (2019), Xu et al. (2021), Yan et al. (2021). Access the Virtual Issue at www.newphytologist.com/virtualissues.

"Canopy fingerprints" for characterizing three-dimensional point cloud data of soybean canopies

Advances in imaging hardware allow high throughput capture of the detailed three-dimensional (3D) structure of plant canopies. The point cloud data is typically post-processed to extract coarse-scale geometric features (like volume, surface area, height, etc.) for downstream analysis. We extend feature extraction from 3D point cloud data to various additional features, which we denote as 'canopy fingerprints'. This is motivated by the successful application of the fingerprint concept for molecular fingerprints in chemistry applications and acoustic fingerprints in sound engineering applications. We developed an end-to-end pipeline to generate canopy fingerprints of a three-dimensional point cloud of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] canopies grown in hill plots captured by a terrestrial laser scanner (TLS). The pipeline includes noise removal, registration, and plot extraction, followed by the canopy fingerprint generation. The canopy fingerprints are generated by splitting the data into multiple sub-canopy scale components and extracting sub-canopy scale geometric features. The generated canopy fingerprints are interpretable and can assist in identifying patterns in a database of canopies, querying similar canopies, or identifying canopies with a certain shape. The framework can be extended to other modalities (for instance, hyperspectral point clouds) and tuned to find the most informative fingerprint representation for downstream tasks. These canopy fingerprints can aid in the utilization of canopy traits at previously unutilized scales, and therefore have applications in plant breeding and resilient crop production.

Analysis of Canopy Gaps of Coastal Broadleaf Forest Plantations in Northeast Taiwan Using UAV Lidar and the Weibull Distribution

Canopy gaps are pivotal for monitoring forest ecosystem dynamics. Conventional field methods are time-consuming and labor intensive, making them impractical for regional mapping and systematic monitoring. Gaps may be delineated using airborne lidar or aerial photographs acquired from a manned aircraft. However, high cost in data acquisition and low flexibility in flight logistics significantly reduce the accessibility of the approaches. To address these issues, this study utilized miniature light detection and ranging (lidar) onboard an unmanned aircraft vehicle (UAVlidar) to map forest canopy gaps of young and mature broadleaf forest plantations along the coast of northeastern Taiwan. This study also used UAV photographs (UAVphoto) for the same task for comparison purposes. The canopy height models were derived from UAVlidar and UAVphoto with the availability of a digital terrain model from UAVlidar. Canopy gap distributions of the forests were modeled with the power-law zeta and Weibull distributions. The performance of UAVlidar was found to be superior to UAVphoto in delineating the gap distribution through ground observation, mainly due to lidar’s ability to detect small canopy gaps. There were apparent differences of the power-law zeta distributions for the young and mature forest stands with the exponents λ of 1.36 (1.45) and 1.71 (1.61) for UAVlidar and UAVphoto, respectively, suggesting that larger canopy gaps were present within the younger stands. The canopy layer of mature forest stands was homogeneous, and the size distributions of both sensors and methods were insensitive to the spatial extent of the monitored area. Contrarily, the young forests were heterogeneous, but only UAVlidar with the Weibull distribution responded to the change of spatial extent. This study demonstrates that using the Weibull distribution to analyze canopy gap from high-spatial resolution UAVlidar may provide detailed information of regional forest canopy of coastal broadleaf forests.