Effects of labial adhesion on maxillary arch dimensions and nasolabial esthetics in cleft lip and palate: a systematic review

Reversed Sequence of Cleft Repair: Palate First, Lip Second in Bilateral Cleft With Severely Protruded Premaxilla and Delayed Presentation

The conventional protocol for cleft lip and palate repair prioritizes cleft lip correction followed by palatoplasty. This sequence optimizes aesthetic outcomes, orofacial function, and developmental milestones, including feeding, speech articulation, and maxillofacial growth. However, reversing this sequence-performing palatoplasty before cheiloplasty-may confer distinct advantages in severe bilateral cleft lip and palate with a markedly protruded premaxilla or in cases with delayed presentations. Early palate repair can facilitate the realignment of alveolar segments, stabilize the palatal arch, and establish a more robust foundation for subsequent lip repair. In delayed presentations, early palatoplasty may enhance speech development and reduce the incidence of otitis media before lip repair.

Intraoral Scanning Evaluation of Maxillary Arch Changes after Modified Sommerlad Palatoplasty for around Three Years

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate dental arch changes after modified Sommerlad palatoplasty in patients with cleft palate by intraoral scanning technique in children with early deciduous dentition.

METHODS

This study included 60 patients with nonsyndromic unilateral complete cleft lip with palate or cleft palate only treated by modified Sommerlad palatoplasty without relaxed excision before 18 months of age and 95 healthy controls without cleft. Three-dimensional images of the maxillary dental arches of all participants at age 3 to 4 years were obtained by intraoral scanning technique. Seven parameters (anterior dental arch width, middle dental arch width, posterior dental arch width, anterior palatal arch width, posterior palatal arch width, anterior dental arch length, and entire dental arch length) were measured.

RESULTS

Compared with the male group, the posterior palatal arch width distance of controls in the female group decreased significantly ( P = 0.039), and the middle dental arch width, posterior dental arch width, and posterior palatal arch width distance of female patients decreased ( P = 0.013, P = 0.002, P = 0.005, respectively). The anterior dental arch length and entire dental arch length distance of children in the unilateral complete cleft lip with palate group was shorter than those of children with cleft palate only ( P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001, respectively). The patient group showed decreased distance of anterior dental arch width, anterior palatal arch width, anterior dental arch length, and entire dental arch length, and increased distance of posterior dental arch width and posterior palatal arch width compared with the control group ( P = 0.0002, P = 0.002, P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001, P = 0.007, P = 0.027, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The results indicated that the modified palatoplasty group showed no growth inhibition in the middle or posterior dental arch width, or palatal arch width, but slight but significant inhibition in the length of the anterior and entire dental arch.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDNCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Evidence Mapping and Quality Analysis of Systematic Reviews on Various Aspects Related to Cleft Lip and Palate

BACKGROUND

Management of cleft lip and palate is interdisciplinary. An evidence-mapping approach was envisaged to highlight the existing gaps in this field, using only the highest level of evidence.

OBJECTIVES

To conduct evidence mapping and quality analysis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses related to any aspect of cleft lip and palate.

SEARCH METHODS

The cleft lip and palate field was divided into 9 domains and 50 subdomains and a method of categorization of systematic reviews was established. A comprehensive search strategy was carried out in seven databases along with the search of gray literature and references of included articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Systematic reviews related to any aspect of cleft lip and palate, conducted by a minimum of two reviewers, with a comprehensive search strategy and adequate quality analysis were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

A self-designed, pre-piloted data-extraction sheet was used to collect information that was analyzed through an expert group discussion. Quality analysis was performed using ROBIS-I, AMSTAR 2, and the PRISMA checklist.

RESULTS

A total of 144 systematic reviews published between 2008 and 2022 were included. The largest number of these could be categorized in the therapeutic domain (n = 58). A total of 27% of the studies were categorized as inconclusive, 40% as partially conclusive, and 33% as conclusive. As per ROBIS-I, 77% of reviews had high risk of bias while 58% were graded as critically low in quality as per AMSTAR 2. The majority of systematic reviews showed low reporting errors.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of systematic reviews related to cleft lip and palate relate to therapeutic and prognostic domains and show high risk of bias and critically low quality regardless of the source journal. The results of this paper might serve as a starting point encouraging authors to carry out high-quality research where evidence is lacking.

REGISTRATION

A multidisciplinary expert-group formulated an a priori protocol, registered in Open Science Framework (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/NQDV2).

The Influence of Four Different Treatment Protocols on Maxillofacial Growth in Patients with Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip, Palate, and Alveolus

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of four different treatment protocols on maxillofacial growth in patients aged 7 to 8 years with unilateral complete cleft lip, palate, and alveolus.

METHODS

Sixty-one patients with nonsyndromic unilateral complete cleft lip, palate, and alveolus were entered into this study and grouped as follows: group 1 patients had a repaired lip and an unrepaired palate; group 2 patients underwent one-stage palatoplasty; group 3 patients underwent two-stage palatoplasty; and group 4 patients underwent lip adhesion and two-stage palatoplasty. The control group was composed of 16 patients with unilateral incomplete cleft lip. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to test the nature of data distribution. The Bonferroni test and the Kruskal-Wallis H test were used for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

Group 5 showed a more protruding maxilla (basion-nasion-A point, basion-nasion-anterior nasal spine, sella-nasion-anterior nasal spine; p < 0.05), longer maxillary sagittal length (anterior nasal spine-posterior maxillary point; p < 0.05) and maxillary basal sagittal length (A point-posterior maxillary point; p < 0.05), and a better jaw relationship (A point-nasion-B point angle; p < 0.05) than groups 2, 3, and 4. Group 2 had higher anterior facial height (anterior nasal spine-nasion, anterior nasal spine-menton, nasion-menton; p < 0.05) and posterior facial height (registration point-posterior maxillary point; p < 0.05) than groups 3 and 4. Groups 2 and 3 had better maxillary position (sella-pterygomaxillary fissure; p < 0.05) and deeper bony pharynx (basion-posterior maxillary point; p < 0.05) than group 4.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients aged 7 to 8 years with unilateral complete cleft lip, palate, and alveolus, both one- and two-stage palatoplasty inhibited maxillary sagittal growth. Vomer flap repair with denuded bone inhibited maxillary vertical growth. Lip adhesion did adversely affect maxilla position.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Management of the protuberant premaxilla: where does it fit in?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss multidisciplinary treatment options for the protuberant premaxilla associated with bilateral cleft lip and palate. Lessons have been learned throughout the years regarding the effect of growth restriction after early and aggressive therapy. Multiple surgical and orthodontic interventions are discussed. Recent literature will be highlighted and discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

A paucity of long-term studies was noted. Recent literature revealed numerous studies introducing innovative presurgical orthopedic devices as less expensive and easier to use alternatives to nasoalveolar molding. Multiple approaches to premaxillary setback were presented, offering multiple approaches to improve success rates and minimize burden to the patient. Novel orthodontic and advanced microvascular procedures were discussed as additional tools for treatment of the malpositioned premaxilla once skeletal maturity is reached.

SUMMARY

Multidisciplinary team management of the protuberant premaxilla and bilateral cleft lip and palate is becoming increasingly embraced worldwide. Numerous surgical procedures and orthodontic treatments are required to optimally reposition the premaxilla; however, these interventions can inhibit growth, resulting in maxillary retrusion. Long-term follow-up studies are needed to determine what protocol is best. Studies should also include ways to overcome barriers to treatment success, such as late intervention, resource disparity, and limited access to care.

Nasolabial Morphology Following Nasoalveolar Molding in Infants With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

AIM

The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effects of nasoalveolar molding (NAM) therapy on nasolabial morphology three dimensionally, and compare the nasolabial linear and surface distance measurements in infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate.

METHODS

Facial plaster casts of 42 infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate taken at the onset (pre-NAM) and finishing stage (post-NAM) of NAM were scanned with 3dMDface stereophotogrammetry system (3dMD, Atlanta, GA). Nineteen nasolabial linear and surface distance measurements were performed on three-dimensional images. In addition to standard descriptive statistical calculations (means and SDs), pre- and post-NAM measurements were evaluated by paired t test.

RESULTS

All measurements except lip gap, nostril floor width, and nostril diameter increased between pre-NAM and post-NAM. Nostril and lip height increased significantly on the cleft side (P < 0.05). No differences were present between linear and surface distance measurements except for nasal width measurement.

CONCLUSIONS

Nasal and lip symmetry improved with NAM. The use of surface distance measurements may be advised particularly for continuous and curved anatomic structures in which circumference differences are expected.

Primary Repair of Cleft Lip and Nose in the Neonatal Period

Facial cleft malformations belong to the most common problems of the congenital facial anomalies. At the Clinic of Plastic, Aestetic and Reconstructive Surgery at the Faculty Hospital in Banská Bystrica we have been performing primary cleft lip repairs during the first week of life of a newborn since 1995. During this life period the fetal healing still persists. Modern anesthetic techniques have considerably reduced respiratory complications after the lip closure. The adequate postoperative sedation together with monitoring of the pacient remarkably reduces the occurrence of wound dehiscence. The advantages of the neonatal cleft lip repair are the scarless healing, no negative effect on the growth of the middle thirt of the face, as well as the pschychosocial effect on the family and the fact that the ortodontic aparat has not been needed.