Gender and ethnic diversity in global ophthalmology and optometry association leadership: a time for change

Social and Health Care Utilization Factors Associated With Ophthalmic Visit Nonadherence in Glaucoma: An All of Us Study

PRCIS

In a diverse nationwide cohort, lower education and income levels, cost saving on medications, fewer past-year medical/specialist visits, and concerns regarding dissimilarity with health care providers were risk factors for ophthalmic visit nonadherence among glaucoma patients.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to characterize social and health care utilization factors associated with nonadherence with ophthalmic visits among patients with glaucoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Glaucoma patients in the All of Us database who completed the Healthcare Access and Utilization Survey were included and categorized into "visit" and "nonvisit" groups based on visit adherence, defined by self-reported past-year encounters with eyecare providers (yes/no). Data regarding potential factors affecting ophthalmic visit adherence, including past-year medical visits, inabilities to afford health care, and self-reported reasons for delayed care, were extracted. χ 2 tests and logistic regression were used to compare the 2 groups. Odds ratios (ORs) of visit adherence were analyzed for potential risk factors.

RESULTS

Of 5739 glaucoma patients, 861 (15%) were in the nonvisit group. More participants in the visit group reported past-year general doctor/specialist visits (94%/65%; vs. nonvisit group: 89%/49.3%; P <0.05). The nonvisit group reported greater difficulty in affording medical care and learning about medical conditions, and higher rates of delayed/missed health care access for various concerns ( P <0.05). Older age (OR=1.02, 1.01-1.03), higher education (OR=1.25, 1.13-1.40), and income level (OR=1.06, 1.01-1.11), not employed for wages (OR=1.28, 1.08-1.53), and higher health care utilization in general medical/specialist visits (ORs range:1.08-1.90) were associated with visit adherence ( P <0.05). Visit nonadherence was associated with cost saving on medication (OR=0.62, 0.40-0.97) and delaying/avoiding seeing health care providers because of dissimilarity (OR=0.84, 0.71-0.99) ( P <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study builds on prior literature by identifying potentially modifiable factors associated with visit nonadherence and underutilization of eyecare in glaucoma. These may inform strategies to improve real-world ophthalmic visit adherence and identify patients who might benefit from additional support.

Female Authorship and Ophthalmology Journal Editorial Board Membership Trends Over the Last Decade, 2012-2021

PURPOSE

To study the relationship between female authorship and editorial board membership in 3 ophthalmology journals from 2012 to 2021.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional and trend study.

METHODS

The prevalence of female first, senior authorship, and editorial board members were examined in Ophthalmology, JAMA Ophthalmology, and American Journal of Ophthalmology. Gender-API assigned gender to authors based on name and country. Editorial board (EB) information was manually extracted and grouped for comparison among leadership positions. Gender data collected on authorship and EB membership were compared. The proportion of women in EB positions was identified: editor-in-chief, mid-level editors, and consulting editors. Relationship between female authorship and editorial board membership was analyzed.

RESULTS

Women published fewer articles as first (1547/4267) and senior (1165/4267) authors than did men. The proportion of women in senior authorship significantly increased from 2012 to 2021 (23.4% to 30.5%, P = .0046). Across EB, a significant increase in female members (13.9% to 34.6%, P = .0006) was observed. There was a significant correlation (P < .0001) between female EB members and female authors (r = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.51-0.87) for all journals. The odds of female first authorships were 1.89 (95% CI = 1.65-2.17) times higher for articles with female senior authors than for male senior authors (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Female senior authorship significantly increased over the last decade. Journals with a higher representation of female EB members also had a higher representation of female authorship. This study found a positive association between first and senior female authorship; however, the gender gap persists. Continued efforts to reach equity in publications and EB representation are necessary.

Race and Gender Shift among Academic Glaucoma Specialists in the Last 5 Decades

Purpose

To evaluate the demographic composition of academic glaucoma specialists currently practicing in the United States.

Design

Retrospective and observational study.

Subjects

Academic glaucoma specialists identified from ophthalmology residency programs listed on the Doximity database.

Methods

The American Board of Ophthalmology (ABO) membership directory, Doximity database, publicly available data, and direct communications were used to identify academic glaucoma specialists and their demographics. Information collected included-name, gender, race/ethnicity, geographic location, board certification date, academic affiliation, and academic rank. Ophthalmic age was defined as the number of years since ophthalmology board certification. Underrepresented minority (URM) groups were defined as Hispanics, Black or African Americans, Latinos, American Indians, or Alaskan Natives as defined by San Francisco match. In addition, the temporal, geographic, and academic rank distributions among females and URMs were explored.

Main outcome measures

Women and URMs representations among academic glaucoma specialists across academic ranks, geographic regions, as well as ophthalmic age.

Results

There were 457 active academic glaucoma specialists identified from 110 institutions in 38 states. Among them, 185 (40.5%) were women and 42 (9.2%) were URM. The proportion of women glaucoma specialists in academia had increased significantly with a rate of 1.049 in odds ratio (OR) per year (p < 0.001). However, there were no significant changes in the proportion of URMs over time. The earliest year of certification was 1,964 for males and 1,974 for females. When controlled for ophthalmic age, there were no significant differences in the distribution of women or URMs between the different academic ranks (p = 0.572 and p = 0.762, respectively). Among assistant professors, women had a significantly higher ophthalmic age compared to men (p < 0.001), but there was no significant difference in ophthalmic age in both the associate and full professor groups. There were no significant differences in the geographic distribution of gender (p = 0.516) and URM across United States regions (p = 0.238).

Conclusion

The proportion of women among academic glaucoma specialists has significantly increased over the past 5 decades; however, the proportion of URMs has been stagnant in the same period. Enhancing URM representation among academic glaucoma specialists deserves to be a future priority.

How to cite this article

Afzali K, Fujimoto DK, Mohammadi SO, et al. Race and Gender Shift among Academic Glaucoma Specialists in the Last 5 Decades. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2023;17(2):98-103.

Evaluating scientific research barriers by gender and other characteristics from the perspective of ophthalmologists in Turkey: A multicenter survey study

BACKGROUND/AIM

The ever-increasing population and life expectancy worldwide increase the prevalence of ophthalmic diseases, and the need for ophthalmic research expands accordingly. In our study, we aimed to evaluate many aspects of the barriers, especially gender disparities, confronting ophthalmologists who aspire to conduct scientific research (SR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this descriptive quantitative study, we distributed an online questionnaire to ophthalmologists in Turkey with 21 questions presented on a five-point Likert scale and two open-ended questions. The survey was prepared with Google forms. Participants were recruited via e-mail and social networks. A multicenter survey was conducted between January 29 and February 20, 2021, and a total of 210 valid responses were recorded.

RESULTS

Participants' responses were grouped into four types of barriers: motivation, time constraints, research support, and competence. Participants' motivation to conduct research was above average (3.54±0.96), but most stated that they have time constraints (3.74±0.97). Participants did not agree that there is adequate support for research (2.35±0.76), and they self assessed their level of the required competence to be average (2.87±1.08). Women were more motivated to do SR than men (p = 0.008), but there were no statistically significant differences between women and men in terms of time constraints, research support, and level of competence (p = 0.853, p = 0.482, and p = 0.558, respectively). Although there is no statistically significant difference between men and women regarding time constraints, female physicians mentioned more about the barriers arising from their personal responsibilities (p = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed that ophthalmologists are enthusiastic about doing SR but encounter obstacles with regard to time availability and research support. In addition, there is a need to reinforce competence in SR. Although female physicians are more motivated than men, they must deal with competing domestic responsibilities.

Interventions to promote access to eyecare for non-dominant ethnic groups in high-income countries: a scoping review

PURPOSE

People who are distinct from the dominant ethnic group within a country can experience a variety of barriers to accessing eyecare services. We conducted a scoping review to map published interventions aimed at improving access to eyecare for non-Indigenous, non-dominant ethnic groups residing in high-income countries.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase and Global Health for studies that described an intervention to promote access to eyecare for the target population. Two authors independently screened titles and abstracts followed by review of the full text of potentially relevant sources. For included studies, data extraction was carried out independently by two authors. Findings were summarised using a combination of descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.

RESULTS

We screened 5220 titles/abstracts, of which 82 reports describing 67 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were conducted in the USA (90%), attempted to improve access for Black (48%) or Latinx (28%) communities at-risk for diabetic retinopathy (42%) and glaucoma (18%). Only 30% included the target population in the design of the intervention; those that did tended to be larger, collaborative initiatives, which addressed both patient and provider components of access. Forty-eight studies (72%) evaluated whether an intervention changed an outcome measure. Among these, attendance at a follow-up eye examination after screening was the most common (n=20/48, 42%), and directly supporting patients to overcome barriers to attendance was reported as the most effective approach. Building relationships between patients and providers, running coordinated, longitudinal initiatives and supporting reduction of root causes for inequity (education and economic) were key themes highlighted for success.

CONCLUSION

Although research evaluating interventions for non-dominant, non-Indigenous ethnic groups exist, key gaps remain. In particular, the paucity of relevant studies outside the USA needs to be addressed, and target communities need to be involved in the design and implementation of interventions more frequently.