Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy and Fenestration Discectomy to Treat Posterior Ring Apophyseal Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study

In Vitro Biomechanical Experiment on the Effect of Unilateral Partial Facetectomy Performed by Percutaneous Endoscopy on the Stability of Lumbar Spine

OBJECTIVES

This study's purpose is to investigate the lumbar biomechanical effects of unilateral partial facetectomy (UPF) of different facet joint (FJ) portions under percutaneous endoscopy.

METHODS

Forty fresh calf spine models were used to simulate UPF under a physiological load performed through three commonly used needle insertion points (IPs): (1) The apex of the superior FJ (as the first IP); (2) The midpoint of the ventral side of the superior FJ (as the second IP); (3) The lowest point of the ventral side of the superior FJ (as the third IP). The range of motion (ROM) and the L4/5 intradiscal maximum pressure (IMP) were measured and analyzed under a physiological load in all models during flexion, extension, left-right lateral flexion, and left-right axial rotation.

RESULTS

When UPF was performed through the second IP, the ROM of the lumbar spine and the L4/5 IMP in the calf spine models were not statistically different from the intact calf spine model.

CONCLUSIONS

UPF through the second IP resulted in a minimal impact on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine. Thus, it might be considered the most appropriate IP for UPF.

Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Discectomy versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation Linked with Posterior Ring Apophysis Separation: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVES

Posterior ring apophysis separation (PRAS) associated with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a relatively rare form of disc herniation. This study aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy (UBE) and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) in the treatment of PRAS with LDH.

METHODS

We enrolled 41 patients who met the inclusion criteria to undergo either UBE (15 cases) or PELD (26 cases) between October 2022 and October 2023. Perioperative evaluation parameters included mean operative time, hemoglobin (Hb) loss, length of stay (LOS), and postoperative complications. Outcomes were assessed at admission, as well as at 1, 3, and 6 months postsurgery using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Additionally, we evaluated the results according to the modified MacNab criteria.

RESULTS

Both groups demonstrated improvements in postoperative VAS and ODI scores. However, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in VAS and ODI scores before surgery, or at 1, 3, and 6 months postsurgery. Additionally, no notable differences were observed in the modified MacNab criteria. The UBE group experienced greater Hb loss, longer mean operative time, and increased LOS compared to the PELD group. Furthermore, 2 patients in the PELD group reported recurrence, while one patient in the UBE group experienced a dural tear.

CONCLUSIONS

UBE and PELD possess strong clinical effectiveness for treating PRAS with LDH. Although the UBE group had a longer mean operative time and LOS, with more Hb loss, the UBE group had a lower recurrence rate. Therefore, UBE remains safe and innovative for the treatment of PRAS with LDH.

Arthroscopic-assisted uni-portal ligament flavum sparing bone anchoring annular suture technique for lumbar disc herniation: A case report and literature review

RATIONALE

Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) manifests in diverse forms. If the nucleus pulposus or endplate tissues protrudes, the location of annular tears also varies, which poses various challenges for the annular suture technique. Tears at the annular attachment area at the edge of the vertebral body (cephalad or caudad) are considered a prohibitively challenging area for annular suturing.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 37-year-old woman presented with a gradual onset of symptoms, experiencing leg pain and numbness over the left leg for 1 year before presentation. The pain radiated to the left S1 dermatome. Despite undergoing continuous medical therapy for more than 6 months, her symptoms showed no improvement. The strength of the left plantar flexion in the ankle and great toe was rated at 4 out of 5. The straight leg-raising and strengthening tests were positive for the left sides. Lumbar computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging revealed left-sided disc herniation at the L5-S1 level, and nerve root compression, confirming the diagnosis of LDH.

DIAGNOSES

The preoperative impression was LDH, intraoperative confirmation of a tear in the annular attachment area at the vertebral body edge.

INTERVENTIONS

This patient was treated with an arthroscopic-assisted uniportal spinal surgery (AUSS) technique focusing on ligament flavum (LF) preservation, protruding nucleus pulposus removal, nerve root decompression, and vertebral edge tear was then sutured using a bone anchoring annular suture with the Smile suture device.

OUTCOMES

This technique was performed successfully in a patient with LDH. Significant improvements were observed in postoperative pain and numbness, Visual Analog Scale, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores. No postoperative instability or complications were observed, with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging confirming complete decompression. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first used AUSS with LF preservation and bone anchoring annular suture technique for LDH.

LESSONS

This case study demonstrates the AUSS combined with LF preservation and the bone anchoring annular suture technique provides favorable clinical and imaging outcomes and is a safe and effective technique for the treatment of LDH.

Clinical Observation of 10-mm Endoscopic Minimally Invasive Interlaminar Decompression in the Treatment of Ossified Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

PURPOSE

This study aims to observe the safety and effectiveness of 10-mm endoscopic minimally invasive interlaminar decompression in the treatment of ossified lumbar spinal stenosis.

METHODS

The clinical data of 50 consecutive patients with ossified lumbar spinal stenosis were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent minimally invasive interlaminar decompression with 10-mm endoscope. Patient demographics, perioperative data, and clinical outcomes were recorded. Visual analog scale scores, Oswestry disability index scores, and modified Macnab criteria were used to assess clinical outcomes. The lateral recess angle, real spinal canal area, and effective intervertebral foramen area were used to assess the effect of decompression.

RESULTS

The mean age of all patients was 59.0 ± 12.3 years. The mean operative time and intraoperative blood loss were 43.7 ± 8.7 minutes and <20 ml, respectively. Two years after surgery, the leg pain Visual analog scale score decreased from 7.4 ± 1.0 to 1.6 ± 0.6 (P < 0.05) and the Oswestry disability index score decreased from 63.8 ± 7.6 to 21.7 ± 3.4 (P < 0.05). The lateral recess angle, real spinal canal area and effective intervertebral foramen area were significantly larger than before surgery (P < 0.05). The overall excellent and good rate at the last follow-up was 92.0% according to the modified Macnab criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

The 10-mm endoscopic minimally invasive interlaminar decompression can safely and effectively remove the ossification in the spinal canal and achieve adequate decompression in patients with ossified lumbar spinal stenosis.

Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: an efficacy analysis

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study evaluated the clinical efficacy of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH).

METHODS

Data of 107 LDH patients admitted to the People's Hospital of Pingyang between July 2019 and May 2023 were analyzed retrospectively, including 51 cases treated with conventional open discectomy (control group) and 56 cases undergoing PTED (research group). We compared curative effects, operation time, intraoperative blood loss (IBL), incision length, time until ambulation, hospital stay, pre- and post-treatment pain intensity, lumbar function, and complications. Pain intensity was measured using the the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and the lumbar function was assessed by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). In addition, the factors influencing the efficacy in LDH patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

The research group showed a statistically higher overall efficacy (P=0.034, χ2=4.479), longer operation time (P=0.002, t=3.114), less IBL (P<0.001, t=29.725), earlier ambulation (P<0.001, t=8.628), shorter hospital stay (P<0.001, t=8.628), and smaller incision length (P<0.001, t=15.948) than the control group. In addition, the postoperative VAS score (P<0.001, t=5.621) and ODI score (P<0.001, t=4.909) were reduced significantly after treatment and were lower in the research group than in the control group. The research group was also associated with a significantly lower overall complication rate (7.14% vs. 21.57%; P=0.032, χ2=4.608), including reduced incidence of lumbar spinal mobility limitation, incontinence, postoperative infection, and cauda equina syndrome. Furthermore, age, course of disease, and treatment method were strongly associated with the treatment efficacy in LDH patients.

CONCLUSIONS

PTED is more effective than conventional open discectomy for LDH treatment. It reduces IBL, shortens incision length, facilitates patient recovery, alleviates postoperative pain, improves lumbar function, and minimizes the risk of postoperative complications.

Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal vs. interlaminar discectomy for L5-S1 lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective propensity score matching study

OBJECTIVE

Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) is a safe and effective minimally invasive surgery for treating lumbar disc herniation (LDH); however, the comparative clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD) and percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) in treating L5-S1 LDH remains unclear. This study compared the clinical advantages of PEID and PETD for treating L5-S1 LDH.

METHODS

This was a single-centre retrospective study analysing clinical data from 120 patients with L5-S1 LDH between February 2016 and May 2020. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for imbalanced confounding variables between the two groups. Perioperative data were recorded, and clinical outcomes, including functional scores and imaging data, were compared between groups. Functional scores included visual analogue scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and modified MacNab criteria. Imaging data included disc height index (DHI), ratio of greyscale (RVG), and range of motion (ROM) of the responsible segment.

RESULTS

After PSM, 78 patients were included in the study, and all covariates were well balanced between the two groups. In the matched patients, the PEID group showed significantly shorter surgical time (65.41 ± 5.05 vs. 84.08 ± 5.12 min) and lower frequency of fluoroscopy (2.93 ± 0.63 vs. 11.56 ± 1.54) compared with the PETD group (P < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, total incision length, and incidence of complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). After surgery, both groups showed significant improvement in back and leg pain based on VAS and ODI scores (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in clinical functional scores and imaging data between the two groups at various time points after surgery (P > 0.05). According to the modified MacNab criteria, the excellent and good rates in the PEID group and PETD group were 91.89% and 89.19%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

PEID and PETD have similar clinical efficacy in treating L5-S1 disc herniation. However, PEID is superior to PETD in reducing operation time and frequency of fluoroscopy.

Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy is a safer approach for lumbar disc herniation

OBJECTIVES

Herein, we explored the safety and efficacy of the percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) and fenestration discectomy (FD) in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH).

METHODS

The complete clinical data of 87 LDH patients, who were admitted to the Peking University People's Hospital between May 2018 and March 2020, were retrospectively analyzed. These patients were initially separated into a control (n=39, treated with FD) and research group (n=48, treated with PTED), based on the prescribed treatments. We compared the basic operational conditions between the two groups, and assessed the surgical outcomes using the visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scores (JOA), and modified MacNab scale. Lastly, we analyzed the complication incidence and life quality of patients at 1-year follow up after surgery.

RESULTS

All participants in both groups completed the operation. The amount of intraoperative blood loss, surgical duration, length of surgical incision, postoperative ambulation start time, and length of hospital stay were all significantly shorter in the research group as compared to the control group (P<0.05). Moreover, the VAS and ODI scores of the patients in the research group were lower than the control group at 3-months after surgery, while the JOA score was markedly higher (all P<0.05). In addition, the success rate was higher, and the complication rate lower, in the research group, compared to the control group (all P<0.05). Lastly, no statistical differences were observed in the quality of life of patients before the operation, or at 1-year follow up (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our analyses, PTED and FD were both effective in treating LDH. However, PTED exhibited a higher success rate, faster recovery time, and was safer than FD.

Posterior Apophyseal Ring Fracture in Adult Lumbar Disc Herniation: An 8-Year Experience in Minimally Invasive Surgical Management of 48 Cases

OBJECTIVE

Posterior apophyseal ring fracture (PARF) is an uncommon disorder that is usually accompanied by lumbar disc herniation (LDH). The aim of this study to describe the 8-year experience of performing minimally invasive treatment of PARF, giving particular attention to surgical technique and clinical outcome.

METHODS

We reviewed 1,324 consecutive patients with LDH seen in our department between 2013 and 2020. Forty-eight patients (3.63%) were enrolled who were diagnosed with PARF associated with LDH and underwent transforminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD). Mean duration of the final postoperative follow-up was 5.1 years. The control group was comprised of 50 patients diagnosed with LDH without PARF at the same facility. Data on clinical outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean operation time in the PARF group was 105.4 minutes, which was longer than the mean operation time of the control group (83.9 minutes) (p = 0.001). Surgical complications, including dural tears (6.3%) and surgical instrument rupture (4.2%) were more common in the PARF group (p = 0.025). However, there was no significant difference in the proportion of excellent and good results and recurrence rates between the LDH patients with and those without PARF, respectively.

CONCLUSION

TELD is a safe and effective minimally invasive approach for the treatment of PARF. However, minimally invasive techniques may require longer operation time and steeper learning curve for inexperienced surgeons. The separation and removal of bone fragments, a key step in the procedure, requires patience and care to prevent rupture, residual surgical instruments, and leakage of cerebrospinal fluid.

Cave-in Decompression Technique in Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy for Ossification Occupation in Lumbar Spinal Canal: A retrospective analysis of 23 cases

OBJECT

Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD) for the treatment of ossification occupation of the lumbar spinal canal is technically demanding. The purpose of this study was to describe an endoscopic cave-in decompression technique in PETD for ossification occupation of the lumbar spinal canal and to report the clinical results.

METHODS

From May 2018 to June 2020, 23 consecutive cases, diagnosed in our institution as ventral ossification in the lumbar spinal canal and treated with PETD, were evaluated. The endoscopic cave-in decompression technique was performed. We analyzed the clinical outcomes on a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Perioperative data and complications rate were also recorded.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 15.7 ± 2.8 months. Mean preoperative VAS score for low-back pain was 5.65 ± 1.43, and decreased to 0.57 ± 0.5 at final follow-up. Mean preoperative VAS score for leg pain was 5.48 ± 1.38, and decreased to 0.56 ± 0.5 at final follow-up. Mean preoperative ODI score decreased from 33.04 ± 5.28 preoperatively to 8.7 ± 2.54 at last follow-up. One patient experienced transient postoperative hypoesthesia, and 1 developed a mild transient decline in muscle strength; both recovered progressively. Postoperative CT and MRI showed that the ossification was effectively removed and the nerve root and dural mater was completely decompressed in all cases.

CONCLUSION

The endoscopic cave-in decompression technique in PETD is a safe and effective treatment method for selected patients with ossification occupation of the lumbar spinal canal.

Application of Triggered EMG in the Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring of Posterior Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy

OBJECTIVE

To describe the rationale and application of triggered EMG (T-EMG) in intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring, and to explore the efficacy and safety of posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy (PPECD) in the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) under multimodal intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IOM).

METHODS

This study was a retrospective cohort control study. The clinical data of 74 patients with single-segment CSR from June 2015 to August 2018 were analyzed retrospectively, of whom 35 underwent IOM-assisted PPECD with triggered EMG (T-EMG group), while 39 were subjected to IOM-assisted PPECD alone (IOM group). Operation time, hospital stay, and complications were recorded for both groups. The curative effect was evaluated according to the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of neck and arm pain, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and modified MacNab scale.

RESULTS

Operations were successful and all patients were followed up for at least 24 (average 31.77 ± 9.51) months with no patient lost to follow-up. No significant difference was found in preoperative baseline data between the T-EMG and the IOM group (P > 0.05). Also, no significant difference was found in the operation time between the T-EMG (108.29 ± 11.44 min) and the IOM (110.13 ± 12.70 min) (P > 0.05) group, but the difference in hospital stay (T-EMG: 5.66 ± 0.99 days; IOM: 7.10 ± 1.43 days) was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The VAS for the neck and upper limbs in the two groups at 1 month post-operation (T-EMG: 2.09 ± 1.07, 2.26 ± 0.92; IOM:2.18 ± 1.05, 2.31 ± 0.77) and the last follow-up (T-EMG: 0.83 ± 0.62, 0.86 ± 0.55; IOM: 0.90 ± 0.50, 0.87 ± 0.61) were significantly different from the preoperative scores (T-EMG: 6.14 ± 1.09, 7.17 ± 1.04; IOM: 6.18 ± 1.28, 7.15 ± 1.23) (P < 0.05). However, no significant difference was found between the two groups (P > 0.05). The 1-month postoperative JOA scores for the two groups (12.69 ± 0.76; 12.59 ± 0.82) and those at the last follow-up (14.60 ± 0.77; 14.36 ± 0.78) were significantly different from the preoperative scores (11.09 ± 0.98; 11.05 ± 0.89) (P < 0.05), but the difference between the two groups was not significant (P > 0.05). One patient in the T-EMG group developed a transient aggravation of symptoms on the first day after surgery. In the IOM group, three patients had intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and symptoms of C5 nerve root paralysis were presented in four patients following surgery. Compared with the IOM group, the T-EMG group had fewer complications (1/35; 7/39, P < 0.05). At the last follow-up, the modified MacNab criteria were 91.43% (32/35) and 89.7% (35/39) for the T-EMG group and IOM group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Triggered EMG prevents the occurrence of neurological complications, which not only aids PPECD for CSR treatment in achieving satisfactory results, but also reduces average hospital stay and complication rates.

One-Stage Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Symptomatic Double-Level Contiguous Adolescent Lumbar Disc Herniation

Objective

To assess the clinical efficacy of one‐stage percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) for symptomatic double‐level contiguous adolescent lumbar disc herniation (ALDH).

Methods

This retrospective study included 16 patients who presented with back and/or leg pain due to double‐level disc herniation underwent PELD for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation (0.27%,16/5877) from January 2014 to September 2019. After follow‐up period of 17.3 months in average, numeric rating scale (NRS) scores and modified Macnab criteria were used to assess the preoperative and postoperative clinical results. Quantitative data were expressed as mean standard deviation (SD) and the data for the variation in the NRS scores before and after the operation were compared using the Wilcoxon two‐sample test. Analyses were performed with IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 19.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Values of P < 0.05 were considered significantly different.

Results

There were 11 male and 5 female patients, with an average age of 19.3 years (range, 15–22 years). One case affected the L₂‐ L₃ /L₃‐L₄ level, seven cases affected the L₃‐ L₄ /L₄‐ L₅ level, and eight cases affected the L₄‐ L₅ /L₅‐S₁ level. The NRS scores decreased significantly in both early and late follow‐up evaluations and these scores demonstrated significant improvement in late follow‐up (P < 0.05). For the modified Macnab criteria, the final outcome results were excellent in 14 patients (87.5%), good in 1 patient (6.25%), fair in 1 patient (6.25%), and the overall success rate was 93.75%.

Conclusion

This study's data suggest that one‐stage PELD is promising treatment strategy for selected symptomatic double‐level contiguous adolescent lumbar disc herniation.