Clinical Outcomes of Culture-Negative and Culture-Positive Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Similar Success Rate, Different Incidence of Complications

Potential interactions between vancomycin and meropenem in culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection: an in vitro study

BACKGROUND

Culture-negative periprosthetic joint infections (CN-PJIs) represent a critical subtype of PJI, and their high prevalence poses substantial challenges for treatment. CN-PJI is commonly managed utilizing antibiotic combinations, however, the interactions between these antibiotics have not been investigated. The aim of study was to investigate the synergistic and antagonistic effects of vancomycin (VAN) and meropenem (MEM), in an in vitro model of CN-PJI.

METHODS

Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC), Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC), Minimum Biofilm Inhibitory Concentration (MBIC), and Minimum Biofilm Eradication Concentration (MBEC) were determined for VAN and MEM. Fractional Inhibitory Concentration (FIC) and Fractional Biofilm Eradication Concentration (FBEC) indices were calculated to assess the synergistic or antagonistic effects of VAN in combination with MEM on Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis), and Escherichia coli (E. coli) incubated alone or in combination.

RESULTS

In the planktonic bacterial phase, MEM showed higher activity than VAN. Resistance increased when the bacteria were cultured together. The combination of VAN and MEM exhibited an indifferent effect against individual Staphylococci but an antagonistic effect against polymicrobial cultures. In biofilm, MEM demonstrated better antibiofilm activity than VAN, especially against E. coli biofilms. The combination of VAN and MEM showed an indifferent effect against E. coli and S. epidermidis-E. coli biofilms, but an antagonistic effect against S. aureus, S. epidermidis, S. aureus-S. epidermidis, and S. aureus-E. coli biofilms.

CONCLUSION

This study provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of VAN and MEM combinations in treating CN-PJIs, highlighting the need for careful consideration when selecting antibiotic treatments for these infections.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

Rising challenges in periprosthetic joint infections: a focus on rare pathogens and their clinical implications

Objectives

The study aimed to evaluate differences in clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) attributed to rare versus common pathogens.

Methods

Data on PJI patients who underwent hip or knee arthroplasty at our center from April 2013 to December 2022 were retrospectively collected. Among the 219 enrolled patients, we compared 32 cases of PJI caused by rare pathogens with 187 controls of PJI caused by common pathogens, analyzing demographic information, clinical characteristics, and treatment outcomes.

Results

In demographic data, the Charlson comorbidity index and preoperative invasive procedures were identified as risk factors for rare pathogen PJI. Clinically, the rare pathogen cohort exhibited a significantly higher rate of sinus tract formation compared to those with common bacteria PJI. In terms of laboratory findings, the mean serum C-reactive protein (CRP) was significantly lower in the rare pathogen group. This cohort also had a significantly lower culture positivity rate and a higher rate of polymicrobial co-infections. The median hospital stay was statistically longer for rare pathogen PJI cases than for those with common bacteria PJI. Furthermore, the rare pathogen group required longer antibiotic treatments and had higher rates of antibiotic-related adverse events, although reinfection rates did not significantly differ.

Conclusion

PJI caused by rare pathogens exhibits distinct clinical presentations. With advances in diagnostic techniques such as metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), optimized culture methods, and an interdisciplinary approach facilitating early targeted treatment, rare pathogen PJIs may achieve outcomes comparable to those of typical cases.

Detection of rare microorganisms in bone and joint infections by metagenomic next-generation sequencing

Aims

This aim of this study was to analyze the detection rate of rare pathogens in bone and joint infections (BJIs) using metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), and the impact of mNGS on clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 235 patients with BJIs who were treated at our hospital between January 2015 and December 2021. Patients were divided into the no-mNGS group (microbial culture only) and the mNGS group (mNGS testing and microbial culture) based on whether mNGS testing was used or not.

Results

A total of 147 patients were included in the no-mNGS group and 88 in the mNGS group. The mNGS group had a higher detection rate of rare pathogens than the no-mNGS group (21.6% vs 10.2%, p = 0.016). However, the mNGS group had lower rates of antibiotic-related complications, shorter hospital stays, and higher infection control rates compared with the no-mNGS group (p = 0.017, p = 0.003, and p = 0.028, respectively), while there was no significant difference in the duration of antibiotic use (p = 0.957). In culture-negative cases, the mNGS group had lower rates of antibiotic-related complications, shorter hospital stays, and a higher infection control rate than the no-mNGS group (p = 0.036, p = 0.033, p = 0.022, respectively), while there was no significant difference in the duration of antibiotic use (p = 0.748).

Conclusion

mNGS improves detection of rare pathogens in BJIs. mNGS testing reduces antibiotic-related complications, shortens hospital stay and antibiotic use duration, and improves treatment success rate, benefits which are particularly evident in culture-negative cases.

The Impact of Culture Negativity on the Outcomes of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Chronic PJI

Culture-positive (CP) and culture-negative (CN) periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) remain a crucial area of research; however, current studies comparing these infections rely on unstandardized outcome reporting tools. Our study aimed to compare the outcomes of two-stage revision of CP and CN PJI using the standardized Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) outcome reporting tool. We retrospectively reviewed 138 patients who were diagnosed with PJI and indicated for two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). The majority of patients in both CP and CN cohorts achieved infection control without the need for reoperation (54.1% and 62.5%, respectively). There was a significant difference in the overall distribution of MSIS outcomes (p = 0.043), with a significantly greater rate of CN patients falling into Tier 1 (infection control without the use of suppressive antibiotics) (52.5% versus 29.6%, p = 0.011). There was also a significant difference in the distribution of septic versus aseptic reoperations after 2nd stage (p = 0.013), with more CP reoperations being septic and more CN reoperations being aseptic. The duration from first to second stage was significantly shorter in the CN cohort (p = 0.002). While overall infection control was similar between cohorts, these data suggest that the outcomes of two-stage rTKA are favorable in cases of CN PJI.

Improved cure rate of periprosthetic joint infection through targeted antibiotic therapy based on integrated pathogen diagnosis strategy

Objectives

This study aimed to determine whether combined of pathogen detection strategies, including specimen acquisition, culture conditions, and molecular diagnostics, can improve treatment outcomes in patients with periprosthetic joint infections (PJI).

Methods

This retrospective study included suspected PJI cases from three sequential stages at our institution: Stage A (July 2012 to June 2015), Stage B (July 2015 to June 2018), and Stage C (July 2018 to June 2021). Cases were categorized into PJI and aseptic failure (AF) groups based on European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) criteria. Utilization of pathogen diagnostic strategies, pathogen detection rates, targeted antibiotic prescription rates, and treatment outcomes were analyzed and compared across the three stages.

Results

A total of 165 PJI cases and 38 AF cases were included in this study. With the progressive implementation of the three optimization approaches across stages A, B and C, pathogen detection rates exhibited a gradual increase (χ2 = 8.282, P=0.016). Similarly, utilization of targeted antibiotic therapy increased stepwise from 57.1% in Stage A, to 82.3% in Stage B, and to 84% in Stage C (χ2 = 9.515, P=0.009). The 2-year infection control rate exceeded 90% in both stages B and C, surpassing stage A (71.4%) (χ2 = 8.317, P=0.011). Combined application of all three optimized protocols yielded the highest sensitivity of 91.21% for pathogen detection, while retaining higher specificity of 92.11%.

Conclusion

The utilization of combined pathogen diagnostic strategies in PJI can increase pathogen detection rates, improve targeted antibiotic prescription, reduce the occurrence of antibiotic complications, and achieve better treatment outcomes.

Culture-negative periprosthetic joint infections: Do we have an issue?

Culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) poses a significant challenge in clinical settings. The lack of information on causative organism(s) leads to uncertainties regarding the choice of antimicrobial treatment, which can potentially adversely influence the outcome. Recent advances in molecular-based diagnostic methods have the potential to address the difficulties associated with culture-negative PJIs. These technologies offer a solution to the existing clinical dilemma by providing identification of pathogens and guiding appropriate antimicrobial treatment. In this narrative review, we provide information regarding: 1) incidence and risk factors for culture-negative PJI; 2) the optimal antimicrobial therapy and duration of treatment for culture-negative PJI; 3) outcome comparison between culture-positive and culture-negative PJI; and 4) utilization of novel molecular diagnostic methods in culture-negative PJI, including pathogen identification, and the implementation of an antibiotic stewardship program.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of single-stage vs two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection: a call for a prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a severe complication of joint arthroplasty that causes significant pain and economic loss. This study aimed to determine whether the current evidence supports single-stage revision for PJI based on reinfection and reoperation rates.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, EBSCO, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to 30 May 2023 to identify studies that compared single-stage revision and two-stage revision for PJI. Data on reinfection and reoperation rates were pooled.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included a total of 40 studies with 8711 patients. Overall, there was no significant difference between single- and two-stage revision regarding the postoperative reinfection rate and reoperation rate. Subgroup analysis by surgery period and different surgical sites revealed no difference between the two groups in the reinfection and reoperation rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the available evidence, our study did not identify a significant difference in reinfection and reoperation rates between single- and two-stage revision for PJI. Given the limitations in inclusion/exclusion criteria and the observed heterogeneity, we acknowledge the complexity of drawing strong conclusions. Therefore, we suggest that the choice between single- and two-stage revision should be carefully considered on an individual basis, taking into account patient-specific factors and further research developments.

Culture-Positive and Culture-Negative Empyema After Thoracoscopic Decortication: A Comparison of Short-term and Long-term Outcomes

Background

Empyema thoracis is a serious infectious disease and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The perioperative outcomes between culture-positive and culture-negative empyema after thoracoscopic decortication remained controversial, especially since there were no studies that reported the survival outcomes between culture-positive and culture-negative empyema.

Methods

This single-institute study involved a retrospective analysis. Patients with empyema thoracis who underwent thoracoscopic decortication between January 2012 and December 2021 were included in the study. Patients were grouped into a culture-positive group and a culture-negative group according to culture results obtained no later than 2 weeks after surgery.

Results

A total of 1087 patients with empyema received surgery, and 824 were enrolled after exclusion. Among these, 366 patients showed positive culture results and 458 patients showed negative results. Longer intensive care unit stays (11.69 vs 5.64 days, P < .001), longer ventilator usage (24.70 vs 14.01 days, P = .002), and longer postoperative hospital stays (40.83 vs 28.37 days, P < .001) were observed in the culture-positive group. However, there was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between the 2 groups (5.2% in culture negative vs 5.0% in culture positive, P = .913). The 2-year survival was not significantly different between the 2 groups (P = .236).

Conclusions

Patients with culture-positive or culture-negative empyema who underwent thoracoscopic decortication showed similar short-term and long-term survival outcomes. A higher risk of death was associated with advanced age, a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score, phase III empyema, and a cause other than pneumonia.

Comparable clinical outcomes of culture-negative and culture-positive periprosthetic joint infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection (CN PJI) with those of culture-positive periprosthetic joint infection (CP PJI).

METHODS

Data were obtained from Embase, Web of Science and EBSCO for all available studies comparing the clinical outcomes of CN PJI with those of CP PJI. The quality of the studies was scored using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess clinical outcomes. Subgroup analyses were performed to explain heterogeneity among the included studies. Publication bias was estimated using Begg's funnel plot. Sensitivity analysis was performed to test the stability of pooled results.

RESULTS

Thirty studies with 1630 (38.7%) CN PJI and 2577 (61.3%) CP PJI were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results of the included studies showed that overall failure rate in CN PJI group (19.0%, 309/1630) was significantly lower than that in CP PJI group (23.4%, 604/2577) (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.47-0.84, P = 0.002). We performed the subgroup analysis based on the surgical strategies, the pooled results of nine studies for patients undergoing debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) revealed that failure rate in CN PJI group (22.2%, 53/239) was significantly lower than that in CP PJI group (29.3%, 227/775) (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.43-0.90, P = 0.01), the pooled results of four studies for patients undergoing one-stage revision revealed that failure rate between CN PJI group (11.5%, 11/96) and CP PJI group (7.6%, 27/355) had no significant difference (OR 1.57, 95% CI 0.75-3.26, P = 0.23), and the pooled results of 19 studies for patients undergoing two-stage revision revealed that failure rate in CN PJI group (16.1%, 171/1062) was significantly lower than that in CP PJI group (20.4%, 206/1010) (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.34-0.79, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

CN PJI group had similar or better survival rate when compared with CP PJI group for patients who underwent DAIR, one-stage or two-stage revision. Negative culture was not a worse prognostic factor for PJI.

Molecular Approach for the Laboratory Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infections

The incidence of total joint arthroplasty is increasing over time since the last decade and expected to be more than 4 million by 2030. As a consequence, the detection of infections associated with surgical interventions is increasing and prosthetic joint infections are representing both a clinically and economically challenging problem. Many pathogens, from bacteria to fungi, elicit the immune system response and produce a polymeric matrix, the biofilm, that serves as their protection. In the last years, the implementation of diagnostic methodologies reduced the error rate and the turn-around time: polymerase chain reaction, targeted or broad-spectrum, and next-generation sequencing have been introduced and they represent a robust approach nowadays that frees laboratories from the unique approach based on culture-based techniques.