Epicardial ablation utilizing remote magnetic navigation in a patient with Brugada syndrome and inferior early repolarization

Ventricular Tachycardia Catheter Ablation: Retrospective Analysis and Prospective Outlooks-A Comprehensive Review

Ventricular tachycardia is a potentially life-threatening arrhythmia associated with an overall high morbi-mortality, particularly in patients with structural heart disease. Despite their pivotal role in preventing sudden cardiac death, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, although a guideline-based class I recommendation, are unable to prevent arrhythmic episodes and significantly alter the quality of life by delivering recurrent therapies. From open-heart surgical ablation to the currently widely used percutaneous approach, catheter ablation is a safe and effective procedure able to target the responsible re-entry myocardial circuit from both the endocardium and the epicardium. There are four main mapping strategies, activation, entrainment, pace, and substrate mapping, each of them with their own advantages and limitations. The contemporary guideline-based recommendations for VT ablation primarily apply to patients experiencing antiarrhythmic drug ineffectiveness or those intolerant to the pharmacological treatment. Although highly effective in most cases of scar-related VTs, the traditional approach may sometimes be insufficient, especially in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathies, where circuits may be unmappable using the classic techniques. Alternative methods have been proposed, such as stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation or radiotherapy ablation, surgical ablation, needle ablation, transarterial coronary ethanol ablation, and retrograde coronary venous ethanol ablation, with promising results. Further studies are needed in order to prove the overall efficacy of these methods in comparison to standard radiofrequency delivery. Nevertheless, as the field of cardiac electrophysiology continues to evolve, it is important to acknowledge the role of artificial intelligence in both the pre-procedural planning and the intervention itself.

Efficacy and safety of catheter ablation for Brugada syndrome: an updated systematic review

BACKGROUND

Patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS) may experience recurrent ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). Catheter ablation is becoming an emerging paradigm for treatment of BrS.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation in BrS in an updated systematic review.

METHODS

We comprehensively searched the databases of Pubmed/Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to 11th of August 2021.

RESULTS

Fifty-six studies involving 388 patients were included. A substrate-based strategy was used in 338 cases (87%), and a strategy of targeting premature ventricular complex (PVCs)/ventricular tachycardias (VTs) that triggered ventricular fibrillation (VF) in 47 cases (12%), with combined abnormal electrogram and PVC/VT ablation in 3 cases (1%). Sodium channel blocker was frequently used to augment the arrhythmogenic substrate in 309/388 cases (80%), which included a variety of agents, of which ajmaline was most commonly used. After ablation procedure, the pooled incidence of non-inducibility of VA was 87.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73.4-94.3; I2 = 51%), and acute resolution of type I ECG was seen in 74.5% (95% CI [52.3-88.6]; I2 = 75%). Over a weighted mean follow up of 28 months, 7.6% (95% CI [2.1-24]; I2 = 67%) had recurrence of type I ECG either spontaneously or with drug challenge and 17.6% (95% CI [10.2-28.6]; I2 = 60%) had recurrence of VA.

CONCLUSION

Catheter ablation appears to be an efficacious strategy for elimination of arrhythmias or substrate associated with BrS. Further study is needed to identify which patients stand to benefit, and optimal provocation protocol for identifying ablation targets.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Mapping and Ablation of Ventricular Fibrillation Associated With Early Repolarization Syndrome

BACKGROUND

We conducted a multicenter study to evaluate mapping and ablation of ventricular fibrillation (VF) substrates or VF triggers in early repolarization syndromes (ERS) or J-wave syndrome (JWS).

METHODS

We studied 52 patients with ERS (4 women; median age, 35 years) with recurrent VF episodes. Body surface electrocardiographic imaging and endocardial and epicardial electroanatomical mapping of both ventricles were performed during sinus rhythm and VF for localization of triggers, substrates, and drivers. Ablations were performed on VF substrates, defined as areas that had late depolarization abnormalities characterized by low-voltage fractionated late potentials, and VF triggers.

RESULTS

Fifty-one of the 52 patients had detailed mapping that revealed 2 phenotypes: group 1 had late depolarization abnormalities predominantly at the right ventricular (RV) epicardium (n=40), and group 2 had no depolarization abnormalities (n=11). Group 1 can be subcategorized into 2 groups: Group 1A included 33 patients with ERS with Brugada electrocardiographic pattern, and group 1B included 7 patients with ERS without Brugada electrocardiographic pattern. Late depolarization areas colocalize with VF driver areas. The anterior RV outflow tract/RV epicardium and the RV inferior epicardium are the major substrate sites for group 1. The Purkinje network is the leading underlying VF trigger in group 2 that had no substrates. Ablations were performed in 43 patients: 31 and 5 group 1 patients had only VF substrate ablation and VF substrates plus VF trigger, respectively (mean, 1.4±0.6 sessions); 6 group 2 patients and 1 patient without group classification had only Purkinje VF trigger ablation (mean, 1.2±0.4 sessions). Ablations were successful in reducing VF recurrences (P<0.0001). After follow-up of 31±26 months, 39 (91%) had no VF recurrences.

CONCLUSIONS

There are 2 phenotypes of ERS/J-wave syndrome: one with late depolarization abnormality as the underlying mechanism of high-amplitude J-wave elevation that predominantly resides in the RV outflow tract and RV inferolateral epicardium, serving as an excellent target for ablation, and the other with pure ERS devoid of VF substrates but with VF triggers that are associated with Purkinje sites. Ablation is effective in treating symptomatic patients with ERS/J-wave syndrome with frequent VF episodes.

Epicardial Substrate as a Target for Radiofrequency Ablation in an Experimental Model of Early Repolarization Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Early repolarization syndrome (ERS) is an inherited cardiac arrhythmia syndrome associated with sudden cardiac death. Approaches to therapy are currently very limited. This study probes the mechanisms underlying the electrocardiographic and arrhythmic manifestation of experimental models of ERS and of the ameliorative effect of radiofrequency ablation.

METHODS

Action potentials, bipolar electrograms, and transmural pseudo-ECGs were simultaneously recorded from coronary-perfused canine left ventricular wedge preparations (n=11). The I_to agonist NS5806 (7-10 μmol/L), calcium channel blocker verapamil (3 μmol/L), and acetylcholine (1-3 μmol/L) were used to pharmacologically mimic the effects of genetic defects associated with ERS.

RESULTS

The provocative agents induced prominent J waves in the ECG secondary to accentuation of the action potential notch in epicardium but not endocardium. Bipolar recordings displayed low-voltage fractionated potentials in epicardium because of temporal and spatial variability in appearance of the action potential dome. Concealed phase 2 reentry developed when action potential dome was lost at some epicardial sites but not others, appearing in the bipolar electrogram as discrete high-frequency spikes. Successful propagation of the phase 2 reentrant beat precipitated ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation. Radiofrequency ablation of the epicardium destroyed the cells displaying abnormal repolarization and thus suppressed the J waves and the development of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation in 6/6 preparations.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that low-voltage fractionated electrical activity and high-frequency late potentials recorded from the epicardial surface of the left ventricle can identify regions of abnormal repolarization responsible for ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation in ERS and that radiofrequency ablation of these regions in left ventricular epicardium can suppress ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation by destroying regions of ER.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Practical Guide to Ablation for Epicardial Ventricular Tachycardia: When to Get Access, How to Deal with Anticoagulation and How to Prevent Complications

Epicardial ablation is needed to eliminate ventricular tachycardia (VT) in some patients with nonischaemic cardiomyopathy. The 12-lead electrocardiogram of VT, pre-procedural imaging and endocardial unipolar voltage maps can predict a high likelihood of epicardial substrate and VT. A septal VT substrate may preclude the need for epicardial access and mapping and can be identified with imaging, pacing and voltage mapping. Pericardial access is usually obtained prior to systemic anticoagulation or after reversal of systemic anticoagulation. A unique set of complications can be encountered with epicardial access, mapping and ablation, which include haemopericardium, phrenic nerve injury, damage to major coronary arteries and pericarditis. Anticipating, preventing and, if necessary, managing these complications are paramount for patient safety. Best practices are reviewed.