Outcomes of 200 consecutive, fluoroless atrial fibrillation ablations using a new technique

Real-world data of radiofrequency catheter ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: Short- and long-term clinical outcomes from the prospective multicenter REAL-AF Registry

BACKGROUND

The safety and long-term efficacy of radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation (CA) of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) has been well established. Contemporary techniques to optimize ablation delivery, reduce fluoroscopy use, and improve clinical outcomes have been developed.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the contemporary real-world practice approach and short and long-term outcomes of RF CA for PAF through a prospective multicenter registry.

METHODS

Using the REAL-AF (Real-world Experience of Catheter Ablation for the Treatment of Symptomatic Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation; ClincalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04088071) Registry, patients undergoing RF CA to treat PAF across 42 high-volume institutions and 79 experienced operators were evaluated. The procedures were performed using zero or reduced fluoroscopy, contact force sensing catheters, wide area circumferential ablation, and ablation index as a guide with a target of 380-420 for posterior and 500-550 for anterior lesions. The primary efficacy outcome was freedom from all-atrial arrhythmia recurrence at 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 2470 patients undergoing CA from January 2018 to December 2022 were included. Mean age was 65.2 ±11.14 years, and 44% were female. Most procedures were performed without fluoroscopy (71.5%), with average procedural and total RF times of 95.4 ± 41.7 minutes and 22.1±11.8 minutes, respectively. At 1-year follow-up, freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias was 81.6% with 89.7% of these patients off antiarrhythmic drugs. No significant difference was identified comparing pulmonary vein isolation vs pulmonary vein isolation plus ablation approaches. The complication rate was 1.9%.

CONCLUSION

Refinement of RF CA to treat PAF using contemporary tools, standardized protocols, and electrophysiology laboratory workflows resulted in excellent short- and long-term clinical outcomes.

Safety of fluoroless radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with pre-existing cardiac implantable electronic device: A single-center study

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is being increasingly performed without fluoroscopy. This study aims to determine the safety of fluoroless RFA for patients with pre-existing cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED).

METHODS

This is a single-center, single-operator, retrospective, observational study of 225 consecutive fluoroless RFA procedures for AF from June 1, 2019 to June 1, 2022. All procedures were performed with intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) support. Patients with pre-existing CIED were extracted from the database. Each CIED was interrogated at the start and end of each procedure and at 30-day follow-up. Pre- and post-procedure CIED interrogations were compared for any change in device or lead parameters. Patients were tracked for any subsequent device malfunction.

RESULTS

Out of 225 fluoroless AF ablations, 25 (10.2%) had pre-existing CIED (14 dual-chamber pacemakers, three dual-chamber defibrillators, three single-chamber defibrillators, one single chamber pacemaker, and four biventricular devices). Mean patient age was 71 ± 6 years. The mean duration of indwelling CIED was 1804 ± 1645 days (range: 78-6267 days). One (4%) patient had lead-related fibrin on ICE imaging. There was no significant difference in lead(s) threshold, impedance, or sensing post procedure or at 30-day follow-up compared to pre procedure. None of the patients required lead revision. There were no intra- or post-op thromboembolic events or subsequent device infection. One patient underwent CIED extraction after 11 months for an unrelated secondary device infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiofrequency catheter ablation for AF can be safely performed without fluoroscopy in patients with pre-existing CIED.

Feasibility of three-dimensional artificial intelligence algorithm integration with intracardiac echocardiography for left atrial imaging during atrial fibrillation catheter ablation

AIMS

Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is a useful but operator-dependent tool for left atrial (LA) anatomical rendering during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. The CARTOSOUND FAM Module, a new deep learning (DL) imaging algorithm, has the potential to overcome this limitation. This study aims to evaluate feasibility of the algorithm compared to cardiac computed tomography (CT) in patients undergoing AF ablation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 28 patients undergoing AF ablation, baseline patient information was recorded, and three-dimensional (3D) shells of LA body and anatomical structures [LA appendage/left superior pulmonary vein/left inferior pulmonary vein/right superior pulmonary vein/right inferior pulmonary vein (RIPV)] were reconstructed using the DL algorithm. The selected ultrasound frames were gated to end-expiration and max LA volume. Ostial diameters of these structures and carina-to-carina distance between left and right pulmonary veins were measured and compared with CT measurements. Anatomical accuracy of the DL algorithm was evaluated by three independent electrophysiologists using a three-anchor scale for LA anatomical structures and a five-anchor scale for LA body. Ablation-related characteristics were summarized. The algorithm generated 3D reconstruction of LA anatomies, and two-dimensional contours overlaid on ultrasound input frames. Average calculation time for LA reconstruction was 65 s. Mean ostial diameters and carina-to-carina distance were all comparable to CT without statistical significance. Ostial diameters and carina-to-carina distance also showed moderate to high correlation (r = 0.52-0.75) except for RIPV (r = 0.20). Qualitative ratings showed good agreement without between-rater differences. Average procedure time was 143.7 ± 43.7 min, with average radiofrequency time 31.6 ± 10.2 min. All patients achieved ablation success, and no immediate complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

DL algorithm integration with ICE demonstrated considerable accuracy compared to CT and qualitative physician assessment. The feasibility of ICE with this algorithm can potentially further streamline AF ablation workflow.

Fluoroless catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a step-by-step workflow

Catheter ablation is an important therapeutic strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). While some critical steps of the procedure have traditionally relied on fluoroscopy, advances in electroanatomic mapping and the growing use of intracardiac echocardiography have made non-fluoroscopic AF ablation a reality. This hands-on review provides an overview on how to perform radiofrequency ablation of AF without the use of fluoroscopy, focusing on technical aspects, new technologies, and troubleshooting.

Rhythmia zero-fluoroscopy workflow with high-power, short-duration ablation: retrospective analysis of procedural data

Background

Fluoroscopy is commonly used during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation to guide catheter navigation and placement. Technology improvements have significantly reduced fluoroscopy time, and subsequent radiation dose, necessary to perform successful ablations. However, there is still no amount of radiation exposure known to be completely safe. The aim of this manuscript is to describe a detailed zero-fluoroscopy RHYTHMIA HDx workflow for AF ablation.

Methods

This was an observational, single-center experience to describe the technique, acute procedural success, and safety using a novel zero-fluoroscopy workflow with the RHYTHMIA HDx mapping system and intracardiac echocardiography (ICE). Seventy-two consecutive patients undergoing de novo or redo AF ablation were retrospectively analyzed. Venous access was guided with ultrasound. ICE combined with the mapping system’s magnetic tracking and sheath detection was used for precise catheter placement in the coronary sinus, at the transseptal puncture, and in the left atrium. A high-power, short-duration ablation strategy guided by local impedance was used. Pulmonary vein isolation was performed or touched up for all patients with additional lines added at the operator’s discretion.

Results

Using this zero-fluoroscopy workflow, all patients achieved acute isolation with no significant procedure-related complications. Average procedure time was 73.7 ± 16.2 min, which included persistent (58%) and paroxysmal (42%) AF cases, and no procedures required conversion to fluoroscopy.

Conclusions

In this experience, a zero-fluoroscopy workflow using the RHYTHMIA HDx mapping system combined with ICE was feasible and safe for ablation in a heterogenous AF population. This approach, in the appropriate patient population, can eliminate radiation exposure to patients and staff.

Fluoroless Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Integration of Intracardiac Echocardiography and Cartosound Module

Objective

To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and clinical efficacy of non-fluoroscopic radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) in comparison to traditional fluoroscopy-guided ablation in a local Canadian community cohort.

Methods

We retrospectively studied consecutive patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) guided by intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) and Carto system (CartoSound module). ICE-guided PVI without fluoroscopy (Zero-fluoro group) was performed in 116 patients, and conventional fluoroscopy-guided PVI (Traditional group) was performed in 131 patients.

Results

Two hundred and forty-seven patients with AF (60.7% male; mean age: 62.2 ± 10.6 years; paroxysmal AF =63.1%) who underwent PVI were studied. Mean procedure times were similar between both groups (136.8±33.4 minutes in the zero-fluoro group vs. 144.3±44.9 minutes in the traditional group; p=0.2). Acute PVI was achieved in all patients. Survival from early AF recurrence was 85% and 81% in the zero-fluoro and traditional groups, respectively (p = 0.06). Survival from late AF recurrence (12-months) between the zero-fluoro and traditional groups was also similar (p=0.1). Moreover, there were no significant differences between complication rates, including hematoma (p = 0.2) and tamponade (p = 1),between both groups.

Conclusions

Zero-fluoroscopy ICE and CartoSound-guided AF ablation may be safe and feasible in patients undergoing PVI compared to conventional fluoroscopy-guided ablation.

Minimal fluoroscopy approach for right-sided supraventricular tachycardia ablation with a novel ablation technology: Insights from the multicenter CHARISMA clinical registry

BACKGROUND

No data exist on the ability of the novel Rhythmia 3-D mapping system to minimize fluoroscopy exposure during transcatheter ablation of arrhythmias. We report data on the feasibility and safety of a minimal fluoroscopic approach using this system in supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) procedures.

METHODS

Consecutive patients were enrolled in the CHARISMA registry at 12 centers. All right-sided procedures performed with the Rhythmia mapping system were analyzed. The acquired electroanatomic information was used to reconstruct 3-D cardiac geometry; fluoroscopic confirmation was used whenever deemed necessary.

RESULTS

Three hundred twenty-five patients (mean age = 56 ± 17 years, 57% male) were included: 152 atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, 116 atrial flutter, 41 and 16 right-sided accessory pathway and atrial tachycardia, respectively. Overall, 27 481 s of fluoroscopy were used (84.6 ± 224 s per procedure, equivalent effective dose = 1.1 ± 3.7 mSv per patient). One hundred ninety-two procedures (59.1%) were completed without the use of fluoroscopy (zero fluoroscopy, ZF). In multivariate analysis, the presence of a fellow in training (OR = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.05-0.46; p = .0008), radiofrequency application (0.99, 0.99-1.00; p = .0002), and mapping times (0.99, 0.99-1.00; p = .042) were all inversely associated with ZF approach. Acute procedural success was achieved in 97.8% of the cases (98.4 vs. 97% in the ZF vs. non-ZF group; p = .4503). During a mean of 290.7 ± 169.6 days follow-up, no major adverse events were reported, and recurrence of the primary arrhythmia was 2.5% (2.1 vs. 3% in the ZF vs. non-ZF group; p = .7206).

CONCLUSIONS

The Rhythmia mapping system permits transcatheter ablation of right-sided SVT with minimal fluoroscopy exposure. Even more, in most cases, the system enables a ZF approach, without affecting safety and efficacy.

Zero-fluoroscopy catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a transitional period experience

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) without using fluoroscopy has been getting popular. In this study, we reported the transition period experience of the zero-fluoroscopy procedure by an experienced operator and shared our zero-fluoroscopy protocol.

METHOD

A total of consecutive 30 AF ablation cases attempted to be treated without fluoroscopy were investigated. Ten serial cases were grouped as fluoroscopy-guided period, and period 1-3 in chronological order. All zero-fluoroscopy attempted cases were assisted with an intracardiac echocardiography device with a three-dimensional electroanatomical system.

RESULTS

Complete zero-fluoroscopy procedure was achieved at the 6th case during the transitional period. During the first period, the total procedure time slightly increased in, but afterward, procedure time was continuously decreased, and it became significantly shorter in the third period than the previous fluoroscopy-guided period. Any additional use of fluoroscopy during the transitional period was mainly for transseptal puncture and diagnostic catheter placement into the coronary sinus. Pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in all patients, and there was one case of hemodynamically insignificant moderate amount pericardial effusion.

CONCLUSION

For an experienced operator, complete zero-fluoroscopy AF ablation might be achieved safely and feasibly within 5-10 cases. Fluoroscopy equipment backup might be useful during the learning period for beginners in the zero-fluoroscopy procedure.

Safety and Efficacy of Minimal- versus Zero-fluoroscopy Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Multicenter, Prospective Study

Radiofrequency catheter ablation (CA) is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) that traditionally requires fluoroscopic imaging to guide catheter movement and positioning. However, advances in electroanatomic mapping (EAM) technology and intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) have reduced procedural reliance on fluoroscopy. We conducted a prospective registry study of 162 patients enrolled at five centers proficient in high-volume, minimal-fluoroscopy CA between March 2016 and March 2018 for the CA of symptomatic, drug-refractory paroxysmal, or persistent AF that sought to assess the safety and efficacy of minimal- versus zero-fluoroscopy AF CA. We evaluated procedural details, acute procedural outcomes and complications, and one-year follow-up data. All operators used an EAM system (CARTO^®; Biosense Webster, Irvine, CA, USA) and ICE. Ultimately, two patients did not pursue CA postenrollment. A total of 104 (66%) patients had paroxysmal AF with a mean ejection fraction of 58% ± 9%. Twenty-six (16.3%) patients were scheduled for repeat ablation. A total of 100 (63%) procedures were performed with zero fluoroscopy. The mean fluoroscopy time in the minimal-fluoroscopy group was 1.7 minutes ± 2.8 minutes. Further, the mean procedure duration was 192 minutes ± 37 minutes in the zero-fluoroscopy group and 201 minutes ± 29 minutes in the minimal-fluoroscopy group (p = 0.96). Pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in 153 patients (100%), with an acute procedural complication rate of 1.8%. One-year follow-up data were available for 152 (95%) patients with a mean follow-up time of 11.3 months ± 1.8 months. A total of 118 (76%) patients remained free from arrhythmia for up to 12 months, with no difference between the minimal- and zero-fluoroscopy cohorts (p = 0.18).

Outcomes and Safety of Fluoroless Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Background

Intracardiac echocardiography and 3D mapping systems allow catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) to be conducted without fluoroscopy; however, the safety and effectiveness of fluoroless AF ablation are not well defined.

Methods

We examined consecutive radiofrequency AF catheter ablations at a large academic teaching hospital from November 2017 to July 2019. Outcomes for fluoroscopy-guided (N = 176) and fluoroless (N = 147) ablations were compared. Cases were designated as fluoroless at the outset of the procedure.

Results

Mean age was 59.5 ± 10 years, 66.9% were male, 71.8% had paroxysmal AF, and the mean CHA₂DS₂-VASc score was 1.7 ± 1.4. There were no differences in patient baseline characteristics. In the fluoroless group, minimal fluoroscopy was used in 17 patients (median, 3 seconds; interquartile range, 1.2-4.8). Mean procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and radiation dose (± standard deviation) were greater in the fluoroscopy group compared with the fluoroless group (194 ± 56 vs 176 ± 46 minutes, P = 0.0021; 10.7 ± 6.6 vs 0.008 ± 0.03 minutes, P < 0.0001; 2759.2 ± 1911 vs 5.4 ± 24 μGy m², P < 0.0001). In multivariable linear regression models, fluoroless AF ablation was independently associated with reduced procedure times (ß = −16.5 minutes, P = 0.01). Acute procedural success (95.5% vs 98.6%, P = 0.1), complication rates (4.5% vs 2.0%, P = 0.24), and 1-year AF recurrence rates (28.7% vs 27.1%, log-rank P = 0.69) were similar between fluoroscopy and fluoroless groups. Excluding the 17 patients receiving fluoroscopy in the fluoroless group did not impact our results (P = 0.013). After exclusion of redo cases, fluoroless AF ablation was no longer associated with reduced procedure times (ß = −11.4 minutes, P = 0.106).

Conclusions

Fluoroless radiofrequency AF ablation had similar effectiveness and safety compared with conventional fluoroscopy-guided AF ablation.

SANS FLUORO Optimized: A Case Report of Pulmonary Vein Isolation in a Patient with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillator and the Optimizer™ III Device

We offer the first reported case of a pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedure performed in a patient with two devices, specifically a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) and an Optimizer™ III device (Impulse Dynamics, Mount Laurel, NJ, USA), using the SANS FLUORO technique with zero fluoroscopy. In total, this patient had six leads traversing the right atrium, including two right atrial leads, three right ventricular leads—two associated with the Optimizer™ system and one implantable cardiac defibrillator lead—and a left ventricular lead.

Fluoroless Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation: Technique and Clinical Outcomes

Fluoroscopy continues to be considered an indispensable part of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation worldwide. Deleterious effects of radiation exposure to patients, physicians, and catheter laboratory personnel are gaining increased consideration. Safety and efficacy of a fluoroless approach for AF ablation is comparable with outcomes achieved with fluoroscopy use. This article focuses on AF ablation with zero fluoroscopy use as well as current evidence on efficacy and safety of this technique. In contrast, minimal fluoroscopy is an alternative. Relying on intracardiac echocardiography for transseptal access and electroanatomic mapping for catheter manipulation can help implement this approach on a wider scale.

Comparison between minimal fluoroscopy and conventional approaches for visually guided laser balloon pulmonary vein isolation ablation

INTRODUCTION

Although balloon-based techniques, such as the laser balloon (LB) ablation have simplified pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), procedural fluoroscopy usage remains higher in comparison to radiofrequency PVI approaches due to limited 3-dimensional mapping system integration.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 50 consecutive patients were randomly assigned in alternating fashion to a low fluoroscopy group (LFG; n = 25) or conventional fluoroscopy group (CFG; n = 25) and underwent de novo PVI procedures using visually guided LB technique.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference in baseline characteristics or cross-overs between treatment groups. Acute PVI was accomplished in all patients. Mean follow up was 318 ± 69 days. Clinical recurrence of atrial fibrillation after PVI was similar between groups (CFG: 19% vs LFG: 15%; P = .72). Total fluoroscopy time was significantly lower in the LFG than the CFG (1.7 ± 1.4  vs 16.9 ± 5.9 minutes; P < .001) despite similar total procedure duration (143 ± 22 vs 148 ± 22 minutes; P = .42) and mean LA dwell time (63 ± 15 vs 59 ± 10 minutes; P = .28). Mean dose area product was significantly lower in the LFG (181 ± 125 vs 1980 ± 750 μGym² ; P < .001). Fluoroscopy usage after transseptal access was substantially lower in the LFG (0.63 ± 0.43 vs 11.70 ± 4.32 minutes; P < .001). Complications rates were similar between both groups (4% vs 2%; P = .57).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that LB PVI can be safely achieved using a novel low fluoroscopy protocol while also substantially reducing fluoroscopy usage and radiation exposure in comparison to conventional approaches for LB ablation.

Near-zero Fluoroscopic Approach for Laser Balloon Pulmonary Vein Isolation Ablation: A Case Study

Fluoroscopy remains a cornerstone imaging modality for catheter placement and positioning in electrophysiology device and ablation procedures. However, efforts are being made to reduce the cumulative exposure to radiation in the patient and physician alike. We present the case of a 59-year-old male patient with hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation who underwent successful near-fluoroless laser balloon (LB) pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) ablation. Though this case demonstrates the usage of a novel protocol for near-fluoroless LB ablation that resulted in successful, uncomplicated acute PVI, the feasibility and safety of this technique should be validated in a larger series or prospective comparative study.

Meta-analysis of pulmonary vein isolation ablation for atrial fibrillation conventional vs low- and zero-fluoroscopy approaches

INTRODUCTION

Radiation exposure during catheter ablation procedures is a significant hazard for both patients and operators. Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures have been historically associated with higher fluoroscopy usage than other electrophysiology procedures. Recent efforts have been made to reduce dependence on fluoroscopy during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) ablation procedures using alternative techniques.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis of studies comparing zero or low fluoroscopy (LF) vs conventional fluoroscopy (CF) approaches for AF ablation. Outcomes of interest included acute and 12-month procedural efficacy, safety, procedure duration, fluoroscopy time, and dose area product. Aggregated data were analyzed with random-effects models, using a Bayesian hierarchical approach.

RESULTS

A total of 2228 participants (LF, n = 1190 vs CF, n = 1038) from 15 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Risk of AF recurrence in 12 months (odds ratio [OR], 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 1.343 [0.771-2.340]; P = .297), redo-ablation procedures (OR [95% CI] = 0.521 [0.198-1.323]; P = .186), and procedural complications (OR [95% CI] = 0.99 [0.485-2.204]; P = .979) were similar between LF- and CF-ablation groups. In comparison to CF ablation, LF ablation led to shorter procedure duration (weighted mean differences [WMDs] [95% CI] = -14.6 minutes [-22.5 to -6.8]; P < .001), fluoroscopy time (WMD [95% CI] = -8.8 minutes [-11.9 to -5.9]; P < .001), and dose area product (WMD [95% CI] = -1946 mGy/cm² [-2685 to 1207]; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

LF approaches have similar clinical efficacy and safety as CF approaches for PVI. LF approaches are associated with shorter procedure time, fluoroscopy usage, and dose area product during PVI.

State of Fluoroless Procedures in Cardiac Electrophysiology Practice

In the past decade, the use of interventional electrophysiological (EP) procedures for the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias has exponentially increased. These procedures usually require fluoroscopy to guide the advancement and frequent repositioning of intracardiac catheters, resulting in both the patient and the operator being subjected to a considerable degree of radiation exposure. Although shielding options such as lead gowns, glasses, and pull-down shields are useful for protecting the operator, they do not lessen the patient's level of exposure. Furthermore, the prolonged use of lead gowns can exponentiate the onset of orthopedic problems among operators. Recent advancements in three-dimensional cardiac mapping systems and the use of radiation-free imaging technologies such as magnetic resonance imaging and intracardiac ultrasound allow operators to perform EP procedures with minimal or even no fluoroscopy. In this review, we sought to describe the state of fluoroless procedures in EP practice.

Combined use of electro-anatomic mapping system and intracardiac echocardiography to achieve zero-fluoroscopy catheter ablation for treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a single centre experience

Fluoroscopy is the principal imaging method for catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, radiation exposure carries potential health risk to patients and operators alike. Our aim was to study safety and efficacy of zero-fluoroscopy CA of paroxysmal AF with a combined use of electroanatomic mapping system (EAM) and intracardiac echocardiography (ICE). In addition, impact of ICE/EAM automatic integration system and contact force (CF) sensing technology on procedural times were assessed. We included 144 consecutive patients (69% males, age 60 ± 10 years, BMI 29 ± 4,6) referred for CA of symptomatic paroxysmal AF. All procedures were performed only with EAM system and ICE. No fluoroscopy was used. The acute procedural success of complete pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in all patients (100%) and adverse events were detected in eight patients (5.6%). In 53 (37%) patients the use of ICE/EAM automatic integration system shortened procedural times compared to those performed without it (148 ± 35 vs. 187 ± 44 min, p < 0.05). Similarly, 89 (60%) procedures where CF sensing catheter was used were shorter compared to those performed without it (163 ± 41 vs. 188 ± 46 min, p < 0.05). Zero-fluoroscopy approach for treatment of paroxysmal AF seems feasible, safe, and acutely effective. Additional reduction of procedural times could be achieved with the use of ICE/EAM automatic integration system and CF sensing technology.