Use of the Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test (CARATkids) in children and adolescents: Validation in Dutch

International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Allergic rhinitis - 2023

BACKGROUND

In the 5 years that have passed since the publication of the 2018 International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2018), the literature has expanded substantially. The ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 update presents 144 individual topics on allergic rhinitis (AR), expanded by over 40 topics from the 2018 document. Originally presented topics from 2018 have also been reviewed and updated. The executive summary highlights key evidence-based findings and recommendation from the full document.

METHODS

ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 employed established evidence-based review with recommendation (EBRR) methodology to individually evaluate each topic. Stepwise iterative peer review and consensus was performed for each topic. The final document was then collated and includes the results of this work.

RESULTS

ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 includes 10 major content areas and 144 individual topics related to AR. For a substantial proportion of topics included, an aggregate grade of evidence is presented, which is determined by collating the levels of evidence for each available study identified in the literature. For topics in which a diagnostic or therapeutic intervention is considered, a recommendation summary is presented, which considers the aggregate grade of evidence, benefit, harm, and cost.

CONCLUSION

The ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 update provides a comprehensive evaluation of AR and the currently available evidence. It is this evidence that contributes to our current knowledge base and recommendations for patient evaluation and treatment.

New concepts in pediatric rhinitis

Rhinitis-and especially allergic rhinitis (AR)-remains the most frequent hypersensitivity condition, affecting up to a quarter of the population and impacting the quality of life of individual patients and the health economy. Data, especially with respect to underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms, mainly derive from studies on adults and are subsequently extrapolated to the pediatric population. Therapeutic algorithms for children with rhinitis are long based on the same principles as in adults. We explore and describe novel aspects of rhinitis, ranging from mechanisms to disease classification, phenotypes, diagnostic and monitoring tools, and the use of treatments, with a focus on the traits of pediatric age groups.

The Measurement of Asthma and Allergic Rhinitis Control in Children and Adolescents

Asthma and allergic rhinitis (AR) are frequently associated. The objective of the treatment of asthma and AR should be the control of symptoms and disease progression. Therefore, the combined measurement of disease control is desirable. In this regard, a questionnaire able to together assess asthma and AR control has been validated: the CARAT (Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test). A further pediatric version (CARATkids) has been generated. The current real-world study used different disease control measures in children and adolescents with asthma and rhinitis. A total of 138 children and adolescents were recruited at three allergy centers. CARAT, CARATkids, ACT (Asthma Control Test), cACT (children ACT), GINA (Global Initiative for Asthma) disease control classification, VAS (Visual Analog Scale) for asthma and nasal symptoms, and lung function were used in all subjects. There was a predominance of males (67.4%) and asthma was well-controlled (according to GINA classification) in about half the subjects. In children, the median CARAT and cACT values were 5 and 22 respectively. In adolescents, the median CARAT and ACT values were 23 for both tests. There were significant differences between CARAT and ACT (p = 0.035) as well as between CARATkids and cACT (p = 0.0001). However, the tests’ outcomes were different as assessed in different domains. CARAT and CARATkids are disease-control measurements that give additional information to other tests, therefore, these different questionnaires to measure disease control complement each other.

Clinical trials in allergen immunotherapy in the age group of children and adolescents: current concepts and future needs

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only treatment option available for allergic patients with disease-modifying intention. Both efficacy and safety has been demonstrated for multiple trials in children, adolescents and adults. Though regulatory requirements for marketing authorization have been clearly outlined and an increasing number of high quality trials has been initiated, multiple concepts and details in study design may be further elaborated, harmonized and improved. An international group of experts in the field of AIT has thoroughly reviewed and discussed current concepts and provided an outlook on further improvement especially in the age group of children and adolescents. Emphasis of the group's discussion as a basis for this article was put on (i) the regulatory background of marketing authorization of AIT products including the 'Pediatric Investigational Plan', (ii) patient reported outcomes and endpoints in AIT trials, (iii) considerations regarding the 'minimal clinically important difference', (iv) the role of placebo effects in AIT clinical trials and clinical routine and (v) the potential of mobile Health for future development of AIT. Current concepts in AIT have been optimized throughout the recent decades, but there remains room for improvement e.g., in the topics outlined in this article.

Validation of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Clinical Trials in Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review

Although regulatory authorities have recently recommended the use of a combined symptom-medication score as a primary efficacy end point, none has been psychometrically validated. Here, we sought to determine to what extent allergic rhinitis (AR)-related patient-reported outcomes (symptom scores, medication scores, disease control scores, and satisfaction or quality-of-life scales) have been assessed for construct, content, and/or criterion validity, reliability, responsiveness, and the minimal clinically important difference. We searched the PubMed database from January 1997 to June 2018 with logical combinations of key words related to validation, AR, and patient-rated outcomes and scales. From a total of 1705 potentially relevant publications, 55 were reviewed. Despite the current emphasis on a combined symptom-medication score for evaluating the efficacy of allergen immunotherapy in AR, symptom scores have not been extensively validated, and we did not find any publications describing the validation of a medication score. Disease control scales (mainly the Rhinitis Control Assessment Test, the Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test, and the Allergic Rhinitis Control Test) and health-related quality-of-life scales (mainly the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire [RQLQ] and the mini-RQLQ) have been extensively validated in AR but have some practical disadvantages as primary efficacy criteria in clinical trials.

Effect of a mHealth intervention on adherence in adolescents with asthma: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Adherence rates among asthma patients are generally low and decrease during adolescence, resulting in poorly controlled asthma. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the ADolescent Adherence Patient Tool (ADAPT), an interactive mobile health (mHealth) intervention, in supporting self-management and improving inhaled corticosteroid adherence in adolescents with asthma.

METHODS

We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial in 66 Dutch community pharmacies. Asthma patients aged 12-18 years were invited to participate, based on pharmacy medication refill records. The main study outcome was self-reported medication adherence, measured with the Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS). Secondary outcomes were asthma control and quality of life. Outcomes were measured at start (t = 0 months) and at the end of follow-up (t = 6 months). Mixed-effects models were used to analyze the effect.

RESULTS

In total, 234 adolescents (147 in the control group and 87 in the intervention group) completed the study; mean age 15.1 ± 1.9 years and 52.6% females. Adherence rates of patients with low baseline adherence (MARS scores ≤19; n = 76) increased with 1.42 points in the intervention group (n = 26). Adherence rates of patients in the control group (n = 50) decreased with 0.70 points. Thus there was a positive effect of the intervention on medication adherence (MARS +2.12, p = 0.04). This effect was stronger (MARS +2.52, p = 0.02) in poor adherent adolescents with uncontrolled asthma (n = 74). No effect of the intervention was observed on asthma control or quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

The ADAPT intervention increases medication adherence in adolescents with asthma having poor adherence rates at baseline. Healthcare providers should consider a tailored mHealth approach to improve the asthma treatment.

Validity and the reliability of the Turkish version of the control of allergic rhinitis and asthma test for children (CARATKids)

Aim: Asthma occurs in association with allergic rhinitis. Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test for Children (CARATKids) is a questionnaire to assess control of both diseases. The aim of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the CARATKids in Turkish children aged 6-12 years. Methods: After a cultural adaptation process, children with asthma and allergic rhinitis were recruited. CARATKids, childhood Asthma Control Test, total nasal symptom score, visual analog scale scores for asthma and rhinitis, peak nasal inspiratory flow and peak expiratory flow values were obtained at baseline and after 4-6 weeks. The patients were classified according to the control level for asthma and rhinitis and stable/unstable groups. Discriminative properties, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, responsiveness, validity and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) were assessed. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed. Results: About 174 patients were included. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.841. Correlation coefficients between CARATKids and external measures of control were 0.42-0.77, and between the score changes of CARATKids and external measures of control it was 0.56-0.78. Guyatt's responsiveness index was -1.88, within-patient change of CARATKids score was significant. The intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.973. The MCID was 4. A cutoff score of ≤5 on the CARATKids had a sensitivity of 100% to distinguish the controlled groups according to both the GINA and ARIA. Conclusion: CARATKids is a reliable and valid tool to assess asthma and allergic rhinitis control in Turkish children. A score of ≤5 on CARATKids defines controlled disease for both diseases simultaneously.

Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test for Children (CARATKids): Validation in Brazil and cutoff values

BACKGROUND

The Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test for Children (CARATKids) assesses asthma and allergic rhinitis control in children younger than 12 years.

OBJECTIVE

To validate the Brazilian Portuguese version of the CARATKids and to define the cutoff values for identifying uncontrolled disease.

METHODS

Children aged 6 to 12 years with asthma and allergic rhinitis were studied (n = 102). CARATKids, childhood Asthma Control Test (cACT), total nasal symptom score (TNSS), and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were obtained at baseline and after 4 to 6 weeks. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, responsiveness, and validity of the Brazilian CARATKids were assessed according to the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurements Instruments checklist. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was evaluated using distribution and anchor methods. Spearman correlations were used to compare CARATKids scores with external measures of control. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to establish cutoff values.

RESULTS

Fifty children completed both visits. The Cronbach α and intraclass correlation coefficient of CARATKids were 0.81 and 0.85, respectively. The Guyatt responsiveness index was -1.34, and within-patient change in clinically unstable patients (n = 31) was significant (P = .02). As for cross-sectional and longitudinal validity, correlation coefficients ranged from 0.58 to 0.77 (P < .001) and 0.30 to 0.57 (P < .05), respectively. The estimated MCID for CARATKids was 3. The optimal cutoffs (sensitivity and specificity) to exclude uncontrolled and controlled disease were 3 or less (97% and 67%) and 6 or greater (56% and 96%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

CARATKids is a reliable and valid tool to assess asthma and allergic rhinitis control in Brazilian children. A score of 6 or higher on CARATKids identifies uncontrolled disease, and a score of 3 or lower excludes poor disease control.