New concepts in pediatric rhinitis

Efficacy and Safety of Montelukast+Levocetirizine Combination Therapy Compared to Montelukast Monotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis in Children

PURPOSE

The combination therapy of leukotriene receptor antagonists and antihistamines may alleviate allergic rhinitis (AR) symptoms better than monotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of Monterizine®, a fixed-dose combination of montelukast and levocetirizine, compared to montelukast monotherapy in pediatric patients with AR.

METHODS

One hundred seventy-six children aged 6 to 14 years with perennial AR symptoms were recruited. One hundred forty-seven subjects were randomized into 1 of 2 groups: the mont+levo group (fixed-dose combination of montelukast [5 mg] + levocetirizine [5 mg]) or the mont group (montelukast single agent [5 mg]). Study subjects took the treatment every evening for 4 weeks and recorded their daytime nasal symptom score (DNSS) and nighttime nasal symptom score (NNSS) in a diary every day. Adverse events (AEs) were also recorded, and patients were surveyed as to their overall satisfaction with the therapeutic product they received.

RESULTS

When DNSS and NNSS were assessed individually, daytime nasal congestion symptom scores decreased more in the mont+levo group during the 4-week treatment period than in the mont group (P = 0.0341). The daytime rhinorrhea symptom scores also decreased more in the mont+levo group (P = 0.0469). The nighttime nasal congestion score (severity when awake) decreased more in the mont+levo group than in the mont group (P = 0.0381). Study subjects in the mont+levo group experienced a greater improvement in quality of life than subjects in the mont group (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination therapy of montelukast and levocetirizine was more effective in reducing both daytime nasal symptoms (nasal congestion and rhinorrhea) and nighttime nasal symptoms (severity of nasal congestion when awake). With fewer AEs and higher overall satisfaction, combination therapy is recommended for pediatric patients with perennial AR.

New progress in pediatric allergic rhinitis

The prevalence of allergic rhinitis (AR) in children is steadily increasing, and its onset is closely associated with genetic factors, living environment, and exposure to allergens. In recent years, an increasing number of diagnostic methods have been employed to assist in diagnosing AR. In addition to pharmaceutical treatments, personalized approaches such as environmental control and allergen-specific immunotherapy are gradually gaining popularity. In this article, we reviewed recent research on the etiology, diagnostic classification, treatment methods, and health management of AR in children. These insights will benefit the implementation of personalized diagnosis and treatment for children with AR, promoting health management strategies that improve symptoms and quality of life.

What's new in pediatric asthma and rhinitis phenotypes and endotypes?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review explores the evolving landscape of pediatric asthma and rhinitis, focusing on identifying and characterizing different subtypes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Childhood asthma and rhinitis are prevalent respiratory conditions frequently occurring together. To address the need for a precise definition of these diseases, an unbiased and comprehensive phenotyping approach has been undertaken with hypothesis-free analysis of extensive datasets to uncover new relationships among clinical, environmental, and biological characteristics. On the other hand, the concept of endotype is elaborate and multifaceted, representing distinct pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the clinical presentation and requires the identification of reliable biomarkers. The recognition of multiple inflammatory endotypes underscores the need for in-depth characterization, which could revolutionize the treatment landscape.

SUMMARY

Comprehending phenotypes and endotypes is crucial for customizing effective and personalized management approaches for children with asthma and rhinitis. More precise and efficient care can be administered through recognition and detailed characterization, ultimately enhancing patients' quality of life.

Biomarkers in allergen immunotherapy: Focus on eosinophilic inflammation

Asthma and allergic rhinitis (AR) are 2 of the most common chronic inflammatory disorders and they appear to be on the rise. Current pharmacotherapy effectively controls symptoms but does not alter the underlying pathophysiology. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is an evidence-based therapy for asthma and AR and has been recognized as the only therapeutic method that actually modifies the allergic disease process. There is a lack of objective markers that accurately and reliably reflect the therapeutic benefits of AIT. A biomarker indicating patients that would benefit most from AIT would be invaluable. Eosinophilic inflammation is a cardinal feature of many allergic diseases. Biomarkers that accurately reflect this inflammation are needed to better diagnose, treat, and monitor patients with allergic disorders. This review examines the current literature regarding AIT's effects on eosinophilic inflammation and biomarkers that may be used to determine the extent of these effects.

Cytological Study of Topical Effect of Azelastine Hydrochloride on the Nasal Mucous Membrane Cells in Various Nasal Rhinitis Types

Previous reports on the benefits of using local therapy with azelastine in rhinitis focus on the assessment of clinical symptoms and the analysis of nasal lavage for the presence of inflammatory cells and the expression of adhesion molecules. Little attention has been paid to studies assessing the effect of azelastine on individual cytotypes of the nasal mucosa, especially epithelial cells, also in the context of inducing morphological changes. The aim of this study was the cytological analysis of swabs taken from the surface of the nasal mucosa of patients with allergic rhinitis (AR) and nonallergic/vasomotor rhinitis (NAR/VMR) who were subjected to 4 weeks of therapy with azelastine and then comparing the obtained results with the pre-treatment condition. The technique of obtaining materials for cytoanalysis included sampling, staining of smears, microscopic analysis, and preparation of cytograms. Our studies confirmed the therapeutic benefits of azelastine in both study groups. Significant changes were demonstrated, confirming the regeneration of ciliated cells and the induction of autophagy and apoptosis in epithelial cells. Such changes indicate new mechanisms of action of azelastine, which play a significant role in restoring homeostasis in the nasal mucosa. The presented research also results in a detailed description of cytological changes in both studied rhinitis types, which complements the knowledge regarding prognostic indicators.

Prevalence and bidirectional association between rhinitis and urticaria: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Rhinitis, allergic rhinitis in particular, and urticaria are both common diseases globally. However, there is controversy with regard to the correlation between rhinitis and urticaria. Objective: To examine the accurate association between rhinitis and urticaria. Methods: Three medical literature data bases were searched from data base inception until January 11, 2022. The prevalence and association between rhinitis and urticaria were estimated by meta-analysis. Quality assessment was performed by using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and pooled prevalence were calculated by using random-effects models. Results: Urticaria prevalence in patients with rhinitis was 17.6% (95% CI, 13.2%-21.9%). The pooled prevalence of rhinitis was 31.3% (95% CI, 24.2%-38.4%) in patients with urticaria, and rhinitis prevalence in patients with acute urticaria and chronic urticaria was 31.6% (95% CI, 7.4%-55.8%) and 28.7% (95% CI, 20.4%-36.9%), respectively. Rhinitis occurrence was significantly associated with urticaria (OR 2.67 [95% CI, 2.625-2.715]). Urticaria and rhinitis were diagnosed based on different criteria, possibly resulting in a potential error of misclassification. Conclusion: Rhinitis and urticaria were significantly correlated. Physicians should be cognizant with regard to this relationship and address nasal or skin symptoms in patients.

Unanswered questions on the use of biologics in pediatric asthma

The emergence of biologic therapies for the management of asthma has been a revolutionary change in our capacity to manage this disease. Since the launch of omalizumab, several other biologics have been marketed or are close to being marketed, suggesting that a plethora of monoclonal antibodies can be expected in the coming years. This will facilitate the transition to the paradigm of personalized medicine, but on the other hand will decisively further complicate the choice of the most appropriate treatment, in the absence of reliable enough biological markers. For these reasons, along with the relatively short time of use with these treatments, there are recurrently arising questions for which there are not even moderately documented answers, and for which the only solution must be based, with all reservations, on the combination of indirect evidence and expertise. In this paper, we attempt to address such questions, providing relevant commentaries and considering the whole width of the evidence base.

Allergic Rhinitis in Preschoolers: A Systematic Review of Diagnostics

BACKGROUND

Most studies that seek to analyze the prevalence of allergic rhinitis do not include preschool children and the diagnosis in this age group is difficult.

OBJECTIVE

Identify complementary tests to the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis in preschool children and verify if there is scientific robustness to propose a diagnostic algorithm for this condition in this age group.

METHODS

Systematic review of the literature in four databases: SCIELO, PubMed/MEDLINE, LILACS and SCOPUS. Each article was initially chosen by title, abstract and by the keywords "allergic rhinitis," "diagnosis" and "preschool." Those articles selected entered the complete reading and data extraction phase. The study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews under number CRD42020207053.

RESULTS

Fourteen articles were suitable for analysis. In the assessment using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies - 2, all studies had at least one domain considered "high risk" or "undetermined risk." Seven reports of nasal cytology, seven of specific IgE, four of immediate hypersensitivity skin test, one of nasal nitric oxide, three of total IgE and one of urinary leukotriene E4 were found. Eight articles evaluated more than one diagnostic test.

CONCLUSION

There are no defined criteria for the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis in preschool children. Nasal cytology, serum specific IgE and immediate hypersensitivity skin test were the most used tests. A reliable diagnostic criterion in this age group is necessary so that in the future it is possible to propose a diagnostic algorithm for allergic rhinitis in preschool children.

Diagnosis and Management of Allergic Rhinitis in Asthmatic Children

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common upper airways inflammatory condition especially in paediatric population; its burden potentially impacts on quality of life, quality of sleep and daily performance, which can be difficult to perceive but not less relevant in the middle-long term. The present review aims to provide an updated overview on AR epidemiology, diagnosis and with a special focus on its connections with bronchial asthma. In fact, when considering asthmatic pediatric population, AR is probably the most important risk factor for asthma onset and the most impactful extra-bronchial determinant of asthma control. Under this perspective, allergen immunotherapy (AIT) should always be considered in the light of a precision medicine approach. In fact, AIT does represent a unique opportunity to specifically interfere with AR immunological background, improve both AR and bronchial asthma control and prevent allergic disease evolution. Verifying the patient's eligibility to that option should be considered as a priority for every physician managing children suffering from AR, especially when associated with bronchial asthma.

Do not forget asthma comorbidities in pediatric severe asthma!

Asthma is the most common chronic respiratory disease in childhood. The long-term goals in managing asthma aim to control symptoms and prevent exacerbations, as well as to reduce side effects of therapy and mortality disease-related. Most of patients have mild to moderate asthma and respond well to standard therapies. However, a minor proportion of children with asthma has severe disease that remains uncontrolled despite optimal adherence to prescribed therapy and treatment of contributory factors, including trigger exposures and comorbidities, which can mimic or worsen asthma and contribute to exacerbations and poor quality of life. Evaluation of comorbidities is fundamental to optimize the management of the disease in a subgroup of patients with poor responder asthma. The overall aim of this article is to describe characteristics of main pediatric severe asthma comorbidities reported in literature, giving clinicians tools to recognize and manage properly these conditions.

The Multidirectional Effect of Azelastine Hydrochloride on Cervical Cancer Cells

A major cause of cancer cell resistance to chemotherapeutics is the blocking of apoptosis and induction of autophagy in the context of cell adaptation and survival. Therefore, new compounds are being sought, also among drugs that are commonly used in other therapies. Due to the involvement of histamine in the regulation of processes occurring during the development of many types of cancer, antihistamines are now receiving special attention. Our study concerned the identification of new mechanisms of action of azelastine hydrochloride, used in antiallergic treatment. The study was performed on HeLa cells treated with different concentrations of azelastine (15-90 µM). Cell cycle, level of autophagy (LC3 protein activity) and apoptosis (annexin V assay), activity of caspase 3/7, anti-apoptotic protein of Bcl-2 family, ROS concentration, measurement of mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm), and level of phosphorylated H2A.X in response to DSB were evaluated by cytometric method. Cellular changes were also demonstrated at the level of transmission electron microscopy and optical and fluorescence microscopy. Lysosomal enzyme activities-cathepsin D and L and cell viability (MTT assay) were assessed spectrophotometrically. Results: Azelastine in concentrations of 15-25 µM induced degradation processes, vacuolization, increase in cathepsin D and L activity, and LC3 protein activation. By increasing ROS, it also caused DNA damage and blocked cells in the S phase of the cell cycle. At the concentrations of 45-90 µM, azelastine clearly promoted apoptosis by activation of caspase 3/7 and inactivation of Bcl-2 protein. Fragmentation of cell nucleus was confirmed by DAPI staining. Changes were also found in the endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria, whose damage was confirmed by staining with rhodamine 123 and in the MTT test. Azelastine decreased the mitotic index and induced mitotic catastrophe. Studies demonstrated the multidirectional effects of azelastine on HeLa cells, including anti-proliferative, cytotoxic, autophagic, and apoptotic properties, which were the predominant mechanism of death. The revealed novel properties of azelastine may be practically used in anti-cancer therapy in the future.

Identification of Robust Biomarkers for Early Predicting Efficacy of Subcutaneous Immunotherapy in Children With House Dust Mite-Induced Allergic Rhinitis by Multiple Cytokine Profiling

Background

Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) is an effective treatment for children with allergic rhinitis (AR), but its efficacy fluctuates among patients. There are no reliable candidate biomarkers for monitoring and predicting the response to SCIT. The present study aims to identify novel biomarkers for early predicting the efficacy of SCIT in pediatric AR patients based on multiple cytokine profiling.

Methods

We prospectively recruited 72 children with house dust mite (HDM)-induced AR who were assigned to receive SCIT. The serum samples were collected and multiple cytokine profiling was conducted by Luminex assay at baseline. All patients were followed-up for 1 year and then categorized into effective and ineffective group based on their efficacy, and levels of 48 selected cytokines were tested and compared between the two groups. The potential cytokines were further validated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in a cohort with 54 responders and 26 non-responders.

Results

Sixty-nine of 72 children completed one-year follow-up schedule with 46 included in effective group and 23 in ineffective group. The results of multiple cytokine profiling showed that 15 cytokines (eotaxin, G-CSF, GM-CSF, IFN-γ, IL-12(p40), IL-13, IL-15, IL-16, IL-4, MIF, MIP-1α, RANTES, SCF, SDF-1α and VEGF) were dysregulated between effective and ineffective group (all P < 0.05). Unadjusted and adjusted multivariate analysis models highlighted that serum eotaxin, IFN-γ, IL-4 and MIF levels closely associated with the efficacy of SCIT in pediatric HDM-induced AR patients. In addition, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves revealed potential values of these four biomarkers in predicting the response to SCIT. Further ELISA validation results in the cohort of 80 pediatric patients demonstrated that serum eotaxin and IL-4 levels were elevated in responders while IFN-γ levels decreased in responders (all P < 0.05). ROC curves demonstrated that serum IL-4 exhibited more reliable accuracy in predicting SCIT efficacy than eotaxin and IFN-γ.

Conclusion

Our discover–validation study suggested that cytokines including IL-4, eotaxin and IFN- γ may serve as robust biomarkers for early predicting response of SCIT in children with HDM-induced AR. These results strengthen the evidence that cytokines were associated with the response of SCIT and contributed to understand its underlying therapeutic mechanisms.

Development of allergic rhinitis in early life: A prospective cohort study in high-risk infants

BACKGROUND

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is the most common allergic disease in children. The development process of AR in early childhood, however, is not well understood. We prospectively investigated the process in regard to not only the nasal symptoms and sensitization but also the nasal cytology, in relation to recurrent wheeze in a high-risk cohort.

METHODS

Infants under 2 years of age with atopic dermatitis (AD) and/or food allergy (FA) symptoms were recruited and followed prospectively for 2 years. The phenotype of perennial AR was classified based on the presence/absence of (1) persistent nasal symptoms, (2) nasal eosinophils, and (3) HDM sensitization, the most common allergen for perennial AR in Japan. AR-like phenotypes were defined as positive for at least two of those three categories. High-risk recurrent wheezer was diagnosed based on the Japanese guidelines and Global Initiative for Asthma. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses for high-risk recurrent wheeze and the AR-like phenotype, adjusting for known covariate risk factors for asthma.

RESULTS

A total of 299 children were enrolled, and 237 subjects (78%) completed the 2-year observation. The prevalence of eosinophilia in nasal secretions increased from 18.5% to 69.9%, while HDM-specific IgE ≥ 0.35 kU_A /L increased from 30.6% to 74.8%. AR-like phenotypes increased from 18.4% to 65.0%. The AR-like phenotype at 2 years was associated with development of high-risk recurrent wheezer (HR 2.062; 95% CI 1.005-4.796).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of an HDM-related AR-like phenotype was markedly increased during infancy in infants with AD/FA and was associated with high-risk recurrent wheezer.

Multiple-Cytokine Profiling: A Novel Method for Early Prediction of the Efficacy of Sublingual Immunotherapy in Allergic Rhinitis Patients

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Endotyping allergic rhinitis in children: A machine learning approach

INTRODUCTION

The diversity of allergic rhinitis (AR) phenotypes is particularly evident in childhood, suggesting the need to analyze and identify new approaches to capture such clinical heterogeneity. Nasal cytology (NC) is a very useful diagnostic tool for identifying and quantifying nasal inflammation. Data-driven approaches such as latent class analysis (LCA) assign subjects to classes based on their characteristics. We hypothesized that LCA based on NC, including the assessment of neutrophils, eosinophils, and mast cells, may be helpful for identifying AR endotypes in children.

METHODS

A total of 168 children were enrolled. Sociodemographic characteristics and detailed medical history were obtained from their parents. All children performed NC and skin prick tests. LCA was applied for identifying AR endotypes based on NC, using the R package poLCA. All the statistical analyses were performed using R 4.0.5 software. Statistical significance was set at p ≤ .05.

RESULTS

LCA identified two classes: Class 1 (n = 126, 75%): higher frequency of children with moderate/large number of neutrophils (31.45%); almost all the children in this class had no mast cells (91.27%) and Class 2 (n = 42, 25%): higher frequency of children with moderate/large number of eosinophils (45.24%) and moderate/large number of mast cells (50%).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study used a machine learning approach for endotyping childhood AR, which may contribute to improve the diagnostic accuracy and to deliver personalized health care in the context of precision medicine.

Systematic evaluation of allergic phenotypes of rhinitis in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

Three allergic phenotypes of rhinitis have been described in adults: allergic rhinitis (AR), local allergic rhinitis (LAR), and dual allergic rhinitis (DAR, coexistence of AR and LAR). Nevertheless, most centers follow a diagnostic approach only based on skin prick test and serum allergen-specific IgE (collectively called atopy tests, AT). This approach prevents the recognition of LAR and DAR, the diagnosis of which requires a nasal allergen challenge (NAC). Here, we investigate the existence of LAR and DAR phenotypes in children and adolescents, and the misdiagnosis rate associated with a work-up exclusively based on AT.

METHODS

Clinical data were obtained during physician-conducted interviews, and AT and NAC were systematically performed in 5- to 18-year-old patients with chronic rhinitis. The misdiagnosis rate was defined as the proportion of cases where AT and NAC results were discordant.

RESULTS

A total of 173 patients (mean age 15.1 years, 39.9% male) completed the study. AR (positive AT and NAC), LAR (negative AT and positive NAC), DAR (positive AT and NAC for some allergens and negative AT and positive NAC for other allergens), and non-allergic rhinitis (negative NAC) were diagnosed in 45.7%, 24.9%, 11.6%, and 17.9% of individuals, respectively. The clinical profile was comparable among allergic phenotypes, but allergic patients had a significantly earlier rhinitis onset, higher conjunctivitis prevalence, and more severe disease than NAR individuals. A diagnostic work-up exclusively based on AT misclassified 37.6% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

LAR and DAR represent relevant differential diagnosis in pediatric rhinitis. NAC increases the diagnostic accuracy of clinical algorithms for rhinitis in children and adolescents.