Efficacy and safety of lurasidone in acutely psychotic patients with schizophrenia: A 6-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Prevalence and associations of fatigue in psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is increasing interest in fatigue in people with psychotic illnesses. This systematic review and meta-analysis reviewed the evidence concerning the prevalence of fatigue and associated factors in adults with psychotic illnesses.

METHODS

Embase, PsycINFO, Medline and CINAHL were systematically searched for articles in English published between January 1946 to 9 October 2023. Inclusion criteria was 'fatigue' in adults (≥18 years old) with a confirmed ICD11 or DSM5 diagnosis of a psychotic disorder. Risk of bias was assessed with the JBI and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled proportions for fatigue with 95 % CI were calculated using random effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q and I2 statistic and Egger's tests were conducted for publication bias.

RESULTS

A total of 57 articles met the inclusion criteria and 7 articles (n = 1161 participants) were included for the meta-analysis of fatigue. Fatigue prevalence was 55 % (95 % CI: 37-71 %, I2 = 94 %). A sensitivity analysis of the 6 studies using a valid scale (n = 711 participants) found a fatigue proportion of 59 % (95 % CI: 41-76, I2 = 93 %). Eighteen studies (n = 4569 participants) were included for an analysis exploring the prevalence of antipsychotic-related fatigue, which was 20.5 % (95 % CI: 11-34 %). We found no significant difference in antipsychotic-related fatigue between studies using a valid scale (27 %, 95 % CI: 14-46, k = 7) and studies using a clinical interview (17 %, 95 % CI: 7-35 %, k = 11) p = 0.302. An Egger's test indicated no publication bias. Quality assessments for included studies revealed that 16 % were at low risk of bias, 9 % at high risk and 75 % at moderate risk. Reported associations with fatigue included sex, age, antipsychotics, distress and depression, sleep, and some negative symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed that a majority of people with psychosis experience fatigue. Antipsychotics, sex, and functioning may contribute to tiredness symptoms, but further research is needed.

Efficacy and Safety of Dose Increase From 40 mg/d to 80 mg/d of Lurasidone in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Post Hoc Analysis of Extension Trial

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of increasing the dose of lurasidone from 40 mg/d to 80 mg/d in patients with schizophrenia.

METHODS

This post hoc analysis focused on patients who completed a 6-week double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of lurasidone and transitioned to a subsequent 12-week open-label extension trial. Patients initially assigned to lurasidone (40 mg/d) or placebo during the double-blind trial (DBT-LUR group or DBT-PLA group, respectively) received lurasidone (40 mg/d) during the extension. Clinicians could increase the dose to 80 mg/d based on clinical judgment. The efficacy outcomes included the change in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score from the start to the end of the lurasidone (80 mg/d) treatment period. Safety outcome was the rate of newly emergent adverse events.

RESULTS

Of 287 patients in the intention-to-treat population, 153 received an increased dose of lurasidone from 40 mg/d to 80 mg/d. Significant reductions in the PANSS total scores were observed in both groups (all P values, ≤0.001). Additionally, 35.9% of the DBT-LUR group and 40.0% of the DBT-PLA group achieved a ≥20% reduction in the PANSS total score. New adverse events emerged in 47.4% of the DBT-LUR group and 48.0% of the DBT-PLA group during the lurasidone (80 mg/d) treatment period.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing the dose of lurasidone from 40 mg/d to 80 mg/d may be effective and well tolerated in patients with schizophrenia. Because of the lack of a control group and blinding, the results should be interpreted with caution.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of a new generic lurasidone: a phase I bioequivalence study in healthy Chinese subjects

Latuda® is a novel antipsychotic drug for schizophrenia and bipolar depression. A bioequivalence trial was performed to investigate the bioequivalence of Latuda® and its generic drug lurasidone. Two independent trials were carried out, each involving 28 subjects. In the fasting trial, subjects were randomly assigned to two groups (1:1 ratio), receiving either 40 mg of generic lurasidone or Latuda®. After a 7-day washout period, subjects entered the second period with a crossover administration of 40 mg of generic lurasidone or Latuda®. The postprandial study design was similar to that of the fasting study. In the fasting study, the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter values of generic lurasidone and Latuda® were as follows: the Cmax was 28.84 ± 19.34 ng/ml and 28.22 ± 21.19 ng/ml, respectively; the AUC0-t was 121.39 ± 58.47 h*ng/ml and 118.35 ± 52.24 h*ng/ml, respectively; and the AUC0-∞ was 129.63 ± 63.26 h*ng/ml and 126.59 ± 57.99 h*ng/ml, respectively. The primary pharmacokinetic parameter, Cmax, was assessed for equivalence using reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE), while other parameters (AUC0-t, AUC0-∞) were evaluated using average bioequivalence (ABE). The results indicate that both Cmax and AUC meet the equivalence criteria. In the postprandial study, the PK values of generic lurasidone and Latuda® were as follows: the Cmax was 74.89 ± 32.06 ng/ml and 83.51 ± 33.52 ng/ml, respectively; the AUC0-t was 274.77 ± 103.05 h*ng/ml and 289.26 ± 95.25 h*ng/ml, respectively; and the AUC0-∞ was 302.44 ± 121.60 h*ng/ml and 316.32 ± 109.04 h*ng/ml, respectively. The primary pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax, AUC0-t, AUC0-∞) were assessed for equivalence using ABE, and both met the equivalence criteria. In the study, lurasidone and Latuda® both exhibited acceptable safety and tolerability. The results displayed that lurasidone and Latuda® were bioequivalent and safe in healthy Chinese participants. Clinical Trial Registry: This trial is registered at chinadrugtrials.org.cn (no.: CTR20191717, date: 2019.08.29).

The effect of second-generation antipsychotics on anxiety/depression in patients with schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Despite the high prevalence of anxiety in schizophrenia, no established guideline exists for the management of these symptoms. We aimed to synthesize evidence on the effect of second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) on anxiety in patients with schizophrenia.

METHODS

We systematically searched Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane library to identify randomized controlled trials of SGAs that reporting anxiety measures in schizophrenia. The search was limited to English-language articles published before February 2024. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Among 48 eligible studies, 29 (n = 7712) were included in the meta-analyses comparing SGAs to placebo, haloperidol, or another SGAs for their effect on anxiety/depression. SGAs had a small effect on anxiety/depression versus placebo (SMD = -0.28 (95 % CI [-0.34, -0.21], p < .00001, I2 = 47 %, n = 5576)) associated with efficacy for positive (z = 5.679, p < .001) and negative symptoms (z = 4.490, p < .001). Furthermore, SGAs were superior to haloperidol (SMD = -0.44, 95 % CI [-0.75, -0.13], p = .005, n = 1068) with substantial study-level heterogeneity (I2 = 85 %). Excluding one study of quetiapine in first-episode patients (SMD = -3.05, n = 73), SGAs showed a small effect on anxiety/depression versus haloperidol without heterogeneity (SMD = -0.23, 95 % CI [-0.35, -0.12], p = 01; I2 = %0). Risperidone's effect on anxiety/depression was comparable to olanzapine (SMD = -0.02, 95 % CI [-0.24,0.20], p = .87, I2 = 45 %, n = 753) and amisulpride (SMD = 0.27, 95 % CI [-1.08,0.61], p = .13, I2 = 50 %, n = 315).

CONCLUSION

While SGAs showed a small effect on anxiety/depression, the findings are inconclusive due to scarcity of research on comorbid anxiety in schizophrenia, heterogeneity of anxiety symptoms, and the scales used to measure anxiety. Further studies employing specific anxiety scales are required to explore antipsychotics, considering their receptor affinity and augmentation with serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors or benzodiazepines for managing anxiety in schizophrenia.

Effect of Lurasidone on Life Engagement in Schizophrenia: Post-Hoc Analysis of the JEWEL Study

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of lurasidone on a new, patient Life Engagement scale in schizophrenia.

Patients and Methods

This post-hoc analysis included participants (ages 18 to 74) diagnosed with schizophrenia who were randomized to lurasidone (40 mg/day) or placebo in a 6-week double-blind efficacy study and those who continued in a subsequent 12-week open-label extension study during which patients received either 40 or 80/mg day lurasidone (flexibly dosed). Change in life engagement was measured using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) 11-item Life Engagement subscale score, and individual subscale items, at week 6 during the double-blind phase and extension phase week 12 during the open-label extension phase.

Results

Analysis focused on 478 subjects randomized to lurasidone or placebo during the 6-week trial, and 146 who received lurasidone during the extension phase. During the 6-week trial, there was a significantly greater change on the PANSS11 Life Engagement subscale score from baseline to week 6 in the lurasidone group compared to the placebo group (mean changes of -6.4 and -4.8, respectively, p = 0.006; effect size = 0.27). Further improvement was evident during the extension phase for patients who received lurasidone in both phases, with a mean change from double-blind baseline to week 12 of the open-label treatment phase of -10.1 on in PANSS11 Life Engagement subscale.

Conclusion

This post-hoc analysis suggests that lurasidone may improve life engagement in patients with schizophrenia, a meaningful outcome from patients' perspective. Further studies are needed to confirm this effect.

Eudract Number

Trial registration: EudraCT Numbers: 2016-000060-42; 2016-000061-23.

Valuable interaction with cognitive remediation and optimal antipsychotics for recovery in schizophrenia (VICTORY-S): study protocol for an interventional, open-label, randomized comparison of combined treatment with cognitive remediation and lurasidone or paliperidone

Background

Cognitive impairment, a core feature of schizophrenia, is associated with poor outcomes. Pharmacotherapy and psychosocial treatment, when used alone, have inadequate effect sizes for cognitive impairment, leading to recent interest in combination interventions. A previous study examined the additive effect of cognitive remediation on lurasidone in patients with schizophrenia, which was negative. Although improvement in cognitive function was suggested for lurasidone, it was inconclusive because there was no antipsychotic control in the study. To clarify whether lurasidone has a meaningful impact on cognitive function in combination with cognitive remediation, we use paliperidone as a control antipsychotic in this study. We hypothesize that combination with lurasidone will improve cognitive and social function to a greater extent than paliperidone.

Methods

The valuable interaction with cognitive remediation and optimal antipsychotics for recovery in schizophrenia study is a multicenter, interventional, open-label, rater-blind, randomized comparison study, comparing the effect of lurasidone plus cognitive remediation with that of paliperidone plus cognitive remediation in patients with schizophrenia. The Neuropsychological Educational Approach to Remediation (NEAR) is used for cognitive remediation. Eligible patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive lurasidone or paliperidone combined with NEAR (6 weeks antipsychotic alone followed by 24 weeks combination antipsychotic plus NEAR). The primary endpoint is the change from baseline in the tablet-based Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia composite T-score at the end of the NEAR combination treatment period. Secondary endpoints will include change from baseline in social function, schizophrenia symptoms, and quality of life at the end of the NEAR combination treatment period. Furthermore, change from baseline to the end of the pharmacotherapy period and change from the end of the pharmacotherapy period to the end of the NEAR combination treatment period will be assessed for all endpoints. Safety will also be evaluated.

Discussion

Achievement of adequate cognitive function is central to supporting social function, which is a key treatment goal for patients with schizophrenia. We think this study will fill in the gaps of the previous study and provide useful information regarding treatment decisions for patients with schizophrenia.

Clinical trial registration

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials ID, jRCTs031200338.

Lurasidone for Treating Schizophrenia and Bipolar Depression: A Review of Its Efficacy

Lurasidone is an antipsychotic medication that blocks dopamine D2 and serotonin 5-hydroxy-tryptamine (5-HT)_2A receptors and affects other serotoninergic and noradrenergic receptors. It has rapid absorption and linear pharmacokinetics. The rates of metabolic syndrome for patients taking lurasidone are comparable to placebo groups. Lurasidone is a safe and effective treatment for patients with acute schizophrenia and bipolar depression. It has been found to improve the brief psychiatric rating scale and other secondary measures in schizophrenic patients and reduce depressive symptoms in bipolar I depression. The once-daily administration of lurasidone is generally well-tolerated and does not cause clinically significant differences in extrapyramidal symptoms, adverse effects, or weight gain compared to a placebo. However, lurasidone's effectiveness in combination with lithium or valproate has been mixed. Further research is needed to determine optimal dosing, treatment duration, and combination with other mood stabilizers. Long-term safety and effectiveness and its use in different subpopulations should also be evaluated.

Systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of lurasidone, brexpiprazole and cariprazine for schizophrenia

A systematic review was undertaken to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of lurasidone, brexpiprazole and cariprazine (selected because of a shared safety profile) with each other or placebo in adult patients with schizophrenia. Key outcomes included: Positive and Negative Syndrome Scales (PANSS), Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scores and cardiovascular and metabolic parameters. A feasibility assessment evaluated the trials' suitability for inclusion in a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA). Random effects models were used. In total, 1138 records were identified and 19 RCTs contributed to the NMA. Lurasidone doses of 160 mg performed best in terms of change in PANSS and CGI-S scores at 6 weeks, with stronger evidence when compared with brexpiprazole than cariprazine. The safety outcomes were variable; for all treatments, the 95% credible intervals usually contained 'no difference'. Active treatments were associated with lower odds of discontinuation due to any cause, and higher odds of experiencing any adverse event. Lurasidone was comparable to brexpiprazole and cariprazine for efficacy and safety outcomes assessed at 6 weeks, with the 160 mg dose being superior for the change in PANSS and CGI-S outcomes. The lurasidone results were relatively consistent across doses compared with brexpiprazole and cariprazine.

Psychometric Properties of Two Tasks in the Allen Cognitive Level Screen-Sixth Edition for Community-Dwelling People Living With Schizophrenia

IMPORTANCE

Empirical evidence is needed on the psychometric properties of the Allen Cognitive Level Screen-Sixth Edition (ACLS-6), an instrument that assesses cognitive functions and is commonly used for people living with schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the convergent validity, discriminative validity, and test-retest reliability of two tasks, stitching and copying, in the ACLS-6 for community-dwelling people living with schizophrenia.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

Psychiatric center.

PARTICIPANTS

110 people living with schizophrenia.

OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

To examine convergent validity, we calculated correlations (Pearson's r) between the two tasks and between these two tasks and three cognitive measures. We checked for floor and ceiling effects and conducted independent t tests to evaluate discriminative validity. We calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) to investigate test-retest reliability.

RESULTS

We found a strong correlation (r = .88) between the two tasks and moderate correlations (rs = .32-.52) between the two tasks and the three cognitive measures. No floor or ceiling effects were observed for the two tasks, and t tests showed significant differences between two participant groups with marginal and mild clinical symptoms (p < .001). The ICC values for the two tasks were .71-.74.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

The stitching and copying tasks of the ACLS-6 have good convergent validity, discriminative validity, and test-retest reliability for community-dwelling people living with schizophrenia. The copying task showed a strong correlation with the stitching task and a similar score range, so practitioners can consider using the copying task as a substitute for the stitching task. What This Article Adds: The stitching and copying tasks of the ACLS-6 have sound psychometric properties for measuring cognitive functions in community-dwelling people living with schizophrenia.

Antipsychotic-Induced Weight Gain: Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Weight gain is among the most important side-effects of antipsychotics. It is, however, unclear whether it is associated with antipsychotic doses. We aimed to fill this gap with a dose-response meta-analysis.

METHODS

We searched multiple electronic databases (last update search June 2021) for all fixed-dose studies that investigated 16 second-generation antipsychotics and haloperidol in adults with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia or with negative symptoms. We estimated the dose-response curves by conducting random-effects dose-response meta-analyses. We used the restricted cubic spline to model the dose-response relationship. The primary outcome was mean weight gain in kg from baseline to endpoint, the secondary outcome was the number of patients with clinically important weight gain.

FINDINGS

Ninety-seven studies with 333 dose arms (36 326 participants) provided data for meta-analyses. Most studies were short-term with median duration of 6 weeks (range 4 to 26 weeks). In patients with acute exacerbation, amisulpride, aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, cariprazine, haloperidol, lumateperone, and lurasidone produced mild weight gain in comparison to placebo (mean difference at any dose≤1 kg), while more significant weight gain was observed by all other drugs. For most drugs, dose-response curves showed an initial dose-related increase in weight which plateaued at higher doses, while for others there was no plateau and some even had bell-shaped curves, meaning less weight gain to be associated with higher doses.

INTERPRETATION

Second-generation antipsychotics do not only differ in their propensity to produce weight gain, but also in the shapes of their dose-response curves. This information is important for dosing decisions in clinical practice.

Impact of Lurasidone on Metabolic Parameters and Prolactin Levels Based on Differences of Psychiatric Diagnosis, Dosage, and Introducing Methods: An Observational Study

OBJECTIVE

Lurasidone is a second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) that contributes an antipsychotic and antidepressant effect, with low incidences of metabolic-related diseases and hyperprolactinemia for the treatment of psychological disorders. However, evidence on lurasidone is limited in psychiatric clinical settings. This study aimed to investigate the effect of short-term lurasidone treatment on metabolic effects and prolactin (PRL) levels, in relation to the differences of psychiatric disorders, lurasidone dosages, and introducing methods, in 35 female and 12 male Japanese inpatients with psychiatric disorders.

METHODS

Subjects were placed into six subgroups divided by three categories (schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder or bipolar disorder, 20mg/day or 40mg/day, adding or switching). Sequential changes in 10 items of metabolic parameters, including estimated insulin resistance and PRL levels at one month, were evaluated. The variations of metabolic parameters that were significantly changed from baseline were analyzed against sample characteristics and other metabolic parameter variations.

RESULTS

In the 40mg/day and switching introduction method groups, lurasidone significantly reduced body weight, body mass index (BMI), levels of alanine amiotransaminase, and levels of fasting blood glucose. PRL levels seemed to increase when lurasidone was added and decrease when lurasidone was switched to from other antipsychotics. Switching introduction method and higher dosage correlated with weight loss and lowering fasting blood glucose levels, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Lurasidone administration offered the potential for weight loss, lowered serum blood glucose levels, and converging serum PRL concentrations. Moreover, switching introduction method with higher dosages might alleviate basal metabolism and glucose homeostasis. Further prospective studies combining measurements of serum insulin and psychometric evaluation will help to confirm our conclusions.

Effectiveness of Lurasidone 80 mg in Patients with Schizophrenia: Results of an Open-Label, 12-Week Extension Study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of lurasidone 80 mg/day (versus the 40 mg/day dose) during a 12-week, open-label extension study in patients with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia who had completed a 6-week double-blind study of lurasidone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 289 adult patients with schizophrenia completed the double-blind study and enrolled in the 12-week extension study. Lurasidone was flexibly dosed at 40 or 80 mg/day. Effectiveness measures included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) subscale scores, Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale (CGI-S), and Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS), analyzed based on last observation carried forward (LOCF-endpoint). Safety/tolerability assessments included adverse events, body weight, laboratory tests, and discontinuation due to adverse events.

RESULTS

Mean endpoint change was greater for lurasidone in modal doses of 80 mg/d (N=136) vs 40 mg/d (N=153) on the PANSS positive subscale (-3.0 vs -2.3), PANSS negative subscale (-1.9 vs -1.7), PANSS General Psychopathology subscale (-5.1 vs -3.8), the CGI-S score (-0.5 vs -0.4), and the CDSS score (-0.7 vs -0.1). Discontinuation rates due to adverse events on lurasidone modal 80 mg/d vs 40 mg/d were 4.4% vs 7.2%; and the most common adverse events in the modal 80 mg/d group were nasopharyngitis, 7.4% (vs 4.6% on modal 40 mg/d), constipation, 5.9% (vs 2.0%), and headache, 5.9% (vs 2.0%).

CONCLUSION

In patients with acute schizophrenia treated with lurasidone 40 mg/d, increasing the dose to 80 mg/d was well tolerated, and was associated with greater improvement in PANSS subscale scores compared to continued treatment with a dose of 40 mg/d.

Differences in the incidence of lurasidone adverse events between depressive disorders and schizophrenia in double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials: a meta-analysis

RATIONALE

We conducted a meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trials of lurasidone (LUR) to examine the difference in the risk ratios (RRs) for adverse events (AEs) between depressive disorders (bipolar depression and major depressive disorders) and schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVES

Three trials for depressive disorders (n = 1,239) were used for flexible-dose LUR 20-60 (LUR20-60) and/or 80-120 (LUR80-120) mg/day. Nine schizophrenia trials (n = 2,684) were used for fixed-dose LUR. The RRs of LUR20-60 and LUR80-120 for depressive disorders were compared with those of LUR 40 (LUR40) and LUR 80 (LUR80) mg/day for schizophrenia, respectively, to match LUR dose.

RESULTS

LUR20-60 caused a higher incidence of akathisia (RR = 2.28; p = 0.003) and weight gain (RR = 4.11; p = 0.05) than placebo in patients with depressive disorders, and LUR40 caused a higher incidence of akathisia (RR = 2.39; p = 0.0001), extrapyramidal symptoms (RR = 1.88; p = 0.02), anticholinergic drug use (RR = 1.58; p = 0.005), somnolence (RR = 2.19; p = 0.002), and dizziness (RR = 2.06; p = 0.05) than placebo in patients with schizophrenia. However, no significant differences in the RRs for all outcomes were found between depressive disorders and schizophrenia. LUR80-120 caused a higher incidence of akathisia (RR = 3.90; p < 0.0001), extrapyramidal symptoms (RR = 2.26; p = 0.04), anticholinergic use (RR = 4.70; p < 0.0001), and nausea (RR = 2.15; p = 0.001) than placebo in patients with depressive disorders. LUR80 caused a higher incidence of akathisia (RR = 2.99; p < 0.0001), extrapyramidal symptoms (RR = 2.55; p = 0.01), anticholinergic use (RR = 1.86; p = 0.01), somnolence (RR = 2.46; p = 0.001), and nausea (RR = 1.64; p = 0.04) than placebo in patients with schizophrenia. Depressive disorders had a higher RR for anticholinergic use than schizophrenia (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of AEs did not differ between schizophrenia and depressive disorders.

Safety and Effectiveness of Lurasidone in Patients with Schizophrenia: A 12-Week, Open-Label Extension Study

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of lurasidone among patients with schizophrenia in a 12-week open-label extension study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who completed a 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study were enrolled in a 12-week open-label extension study with flexible dosing of lurasidone at 40 or 80 mg/day. Safety assessments included adverse events, vital signs, laboratory tests, and electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters. Effectiveness measures included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score, Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale (CGI-S), Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) and quality of life measure.

RESULTS

A total of 289 patients were enrolled in the open-label extension study. Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were low; akathisia was the most common TEAE with an incidence of 6.6%. There were 54 patients (18.7%) who discontinued the extension study, with 17 (5.9%) discontinuing due to adverse events. Minimal or no effects of lurasidone on weight, body mass index, metabolic parameters, prolactin, and ECG parameters were evident. There was continued improvement to week 12 in PANSS and CGI-S scores beyond the initial gains made during the prior 6-week double-blind study. Non-responders to lurasidone 40 mg/day in the prior 6-week study showed a mean (standard deviation) improvement from open-label baseline of 10.7 (13.8) points on the PANSS total score after lurasidone dose was increased to a modal dose of 80 mg/day during the extension study. Changes from double-blind baseline in CDSS and quality of life were maintained in the extension study.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with lurasidone 40 or 80 mg once daily (flexibly dosed) continued to be well tolerated with patients demonstrating further improvement in symptoms over the course of a 12-week open-label extension study in patients with schizophrenia.