Impact of donor-recipient sex match on long-term survival after heart transplantation in children: An analysis of 5797 pediatric heart transplants

Differences in excess mortality by recipient sex after heart transplant: An individual patient data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Identification of differences in mortality risk between female and male heart transplant recipients may prompt sex-specific management strategies. Because worldwide, males of all ages have higher absolute mortality rates than females, we aimed to compare the excess risk of mortality (risk above the general population) in female vs male heart transplant recipients.

METHODS

We used relative survival models conducted separately in SRTR and CTS cohorts from 1988-2019, and subsequently combined using 2-stage individual patient data meta-analysis, to compare the excess risk of mortality in female vs male first heart transplant recipients, accounting for the modifying effects of donor sex and recipient current age.

RESULTS

We analyzed 108,918 patients. When the donor was male, female recipients 0-12 years (Relative excess risk (RER) 1.13, 95% CI 1.00-1.26), 13-44 years (RER 1.17, 95% CI 1.10-1.25), and ≥45 years (RER 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.27) showed higher excess mortality risks than male recipients of the same age. When the donor was female, only female recipients 13-44 years showed higher excess risks of mortality than males (RER 1.09, 95% CI 1.00-1.20), though not significantly (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of a male donor, female recipients of all ages had significantly higher excess mortality than males. When the donor was female, female recipients of reproductive age had higher excess risks of mortality than male recipients of the same age, though this was not statistically significant. Further investigation is required to determine the reasons underlying these differences.

Female donor hearts can improve survival for male pediatric heart transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Both gender- and weight-matching between donor and recipient are thought to impact survival in pediatric heart transplantation, with clinical dogma holding that male donor hearts and "ideal" weight-matching yield superior survival. The composite impacts of gender and weight on post-transplant survival (PTS) are understudied.

METHODS

All pediatric (age <18) heart recipients between 1989 and 2021 with the complete recipient and donor gender and weight data were identified in the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Patients were grouped by recipient-donor gender (M & F) and donor-to-recipient weight ratio (DRWR; undersized [<0.8], ideal-sized [0.8-1.5], oversized [>1.5]).

RESULTS

A total of 10 697 patients were identified. Among male recipients, PTS was greatest with oversized DRWR from either male or female donors (median 22.4 and 20.6 years; p < .001 vs. others) and lowest for undersized DRWR from either male or female donors (median 13.4 and 13.2 years; p < .001 vs. others). The majority (64%) of male recipients received ideal-sized DRWR, among which female donor hearts yielded superior survival to males (median 18.9 vs. 17.4 years, p = .014). No differences in PTS existed for female recipients on the basis of gender-match, DRWR, and gender/DRWR together (all p > .1).

CONCLUSIONS

When considered together, gender and DRWR pairings impact PTS in male-but not female-pediatric heart transplant recipients. For males receiving ideal-sized DRWR organs (most common pairing, >60%), male recipients achieve superior survival when female donor hearts are transplanted. These findings suggest that if weight is being used for size-matching, donor gender should also be considered, particularly for male recipients.

Pediatric heart transplantation: The past, the present, and the future

Heart transplantation (HTx) has a storied past, with origins dating back to the early twentieth century and the first pediatric orthotopic heart transplant performed in 1967 on a neonate with Ebstein abnormality. Today, approximately 500 pediatric HTx are performed annually, with survival times now measured in decades rather than days or weeks. In large part, advances in immunosuppression, critical care, dedicated transplant teams and mechanical circulatory support have paved the way for improvements in waitlist mortality and post-transplant survival, with future directions including the development of intracorporeal ventricular assist devices (VADs) for small children, expanding/standardizing donor criteria, and xenotransplantation.

Sex disparities in the current era of pediatric heart transplantation in the United States

BACKGROUND

While sex-related differences in transplant outcomes have been well characterized amongst adults, there are no sex-specific pediatric heart transplant studies over the last decade and none evaluating waitlist outcomes. In a contemporary cohort of children undergoing heart transplantation in the United States, this analysis was performed to determine if there were sex disparities in waitlist and/or post-transplant outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective review of Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database from December 16, 2011 to February 28, 2019 to compare male and female children after listing and after transplant. Demographic, clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared unadjusted and after 1:1 propensity matching for selected covariates.

RESULTS

Of 4089 patients, 2299 (56%) were males. At listing, males were more likely to be older, have congenital heart disease (58% vs 48%), renal dysfunction (49% vs 44%) and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (9% vs 7%). At transplant, males were more likely to have renal (42 % vs 35%) and liver dysfunction (13% vs 10%), PRA >10% (29% vs 22%) and ischemic time >3.5 hours (p < 0.05 for all). There were no significant sex differences found in unadjusted rates of transplant or mortality. After propensity matching, females had increased waitlist mortality (HR 1.3, 95%CI 1.04-1.5; p =0.019) compared to males. There were no significant differences in post-transplant morbidity or mortality (HR 1.2, 95% CI 0.93-1.5; p = 0.18) between groups.

CONCLUSION

In a contemporary pediatric cohort, females have inferior heart transplant waitlist survival compared to propensity-matched males despite lower acuity of illness at listing and similar rates of transplantation. There were no sex-disparities noted in post-transplant outcomes.

Differences in Heart Graft Survival by Recipient Sex

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

We aimed to characterize patterns of differences in heart graft failure rates by recipient sex, accounting for modifying effects of donor sex and recipient age.

The impact of donor sex on heart transplantation outcomes-a study of over 60,000 patients in the United States

BACKGROUND

The impact of donor sex on heart transplantation outcomes irrespective of recipient sex remains unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of donor sex on heart transplantation outcomes in the United States.

METHODS

From 1987 to March 2019, 63,775 adult patients who underwent heart transplantation were matched to 27,509 male and 11,474 female donors in the United States. Data were prospectively collected by the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS). Patients without missing data were stratified by donor sex and donor menopause status. The groups were matched 1:1 using the propensity score of each patient. Kaplan-Meier survival and cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints were postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Propensity matching generated 15,506 and 1,094 patients based on donor sex and menopause status, respectively. Recipients who received female donor allografts were more likely to have acute rejection episodes requiring anti-rejection medical treatment (11.9% vs 10.1%, p = .007) and require post-transplant dialysis (10.9% vs 9.3%, p = .001) than those who received male donor allografts. Overall survival using female vs male donor allografts was similar (p = .34). Recipients who received pre- vs post-menopausal female donor hearts had similar postoperative outcomes and overall survival (p = .23).

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of the UNOS database showed similar median survival using female vs male donor hearts in adult heart transplantation, irrespective of donor menopause status. Female donor allografts are used far less frequently, thus these results represent an opportunity to maximize usage by better utilization of suitable female donor organs.

Differences in Liver Graft Survival by Recipient Sex

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

We aimed to characterize patterns of differences in liver graft failure rates by recipient sex, accounting for the modifying effects of donor sex and recipient age.

Gender medicine in corneal transplantation: influence of sex mismatch on rejection episodes and graft survival in a prospective cohort of patients

To evaluate the effect of donor-to-recipient sex mismatched (male donor corneas to female recipients) on the incidence of rejection episodes and failures up to 1 year after corneal transplantation. Prospective observational cohort study, with donor corneas randomly assigned and surgeons blind to the sex of donor. A unique eye bank retrieved and selected the donor corneas transplanted in 4 ophthalmic units in patients with clinical indication for primary or repeated keratoplasty for optical reasons, perforating or lamellar, either anterior or posterior. Rejection episode defined as any reversible or irreversible endothelial, epithelial or stromal sign, with or without development of corneal edema, and graft failure as a permanently cloudy graft or a regraft for any reason detected or acknowledged during a postoperative ophthalmic visit at any time up to 1 year after surgery were recorded.156 (28.6%) patients resulted donor-to-recipient gender mismatched for H-Y antigen (male donor to female recipient). During the 12 months follow-up, 83 (14.7%, 95% CI 12.0-17.9) grafts showed at least 1 rejection episode and 17 (3.2%, 95% CI 2.0-5.0) failed after immune rejection, among 54 (9.6%, 95% CI 7.4-12.3) grafts failed for all causes. No significant differences between matched and mismatched patients were found for cumulative incidence of both rejection episodes (15.2% and 13.5%) and graft failures following rejection (3.2% and 2.6%), respectively. Multivariable analyses showed that H-Y matching either is not a predictive factor for rejection or graft failure nor seems to influence incidence of failures on respect to patient's risk category. The lack of influence of donor-to-recipient mismatched on the rate of rejections and graft failures resulting from this study do not support the adoption of donor-recipient matching in the allocation of corneas for transplantation.

Equally Interchangeable? How Sex and Gender Affect Transplantation

Organ transplantation as an option to overcome end-stage diseases is common in countries with advanced healthcare systems and is increasingly provided in emerging and developing countries. A review of the literature points to sex- and gender-based inequity in the field with differences reported at each step of the transplant process, including access to a transplantation waiting list, access to transplantation once waitlisted, as well as outcome after transplantation. In this review, we summarize the data regarding sex- and gender-based disparity in adult and pediatric kidney, liver, lung, heart, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and argue that there are not only biological but also psychological and socioeconomic issues that contribute to disparity in the outcome, as well as an inequitable access to transplantation for women and girls. Because the demand for organs has always exceeded the supply, the transplant community has long recognized the need to ensure equity and efficiency of the organ allocation system. In the spirit of equity and equality, the authors call for recognition of these inequities and the development of policies that have the potential to ensure that girls and women have equitable access to transplantation.

Lean body mass is the strongest anthropometric predictor of left ventricular mass in the obese paediatric population

BACKGROUND

Indexing left ventricular mass to body surface area or height2.7 leads to inaccuracies in diagnosing left ventricular hypertrophy in obese children. Lean body mass predictive equations provide the opportunity to determine the utility of lean body mass in indexing left ventricular mass. Our objectives were to compare the diagnostic accuracy of predicted lean body mass, body surface area, and height in detecting abnormal left ventricle mass in obese children.

METHODS

Obese non-hypertensive patients aged 4-21 years were recruited prospectively. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was used to measure lean body mass. Height, weight, sex, race, and body mass index z-score were used to calculate predicted lean body mass.

RESULTS

We enrolled 328 patients. Average age was 12.6 ± 3.8 years. Measured lean body mass had the strongest relationship with left ventricular mass (R2 = 0.84, p < 0.01) compared to predicted lean body mass (R2 = 0.82, p < 0.01), body surface area (R2 = 0.80, p < 0.01), and height2.7 (R2 = 0.65, p < 0.01). Of the clinically derived variables, predicted lean body mass was the only measure to have an independent association with left ventricular mass (β = 0.90, p < 0.01). Predicted lean body mass was the most accurate scaling variable in detecting left ventricular hypertrophy (positive predictive value = 88%, negative predictive value = 99%).

CONCLUSIONS

Lean body mass is the strongest predictor of left ventricular mass in obese children. Predicted lean body mass is the most accurate anthropometric scaling variable for left ventricular mass in left ventricular hypertrophy detection. Predicted lean body mass should be considered for clinical use as the body size correcting variable for left ventricular mass in obese children.

Sex matching does not impact the outcome after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

Background

Several studies in solid organ transplantation have shown a correlation between donor and recipient sex mismatch and risk of graft loss. In this study, we aimed to analyze the impact of donor and recipient sex matching on patient and pancreas graft survival in a large single‐center cohort.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed all first simultaneous pancreas‐kidney transplants performed between 1979 and 2017 at the Medical University of Innsbruck.

Results

Of 452 patients, 54.6% (247) received a sex‐matched transplant. Patient survival (P = .86), death‐censored pancreas graft survival (dcPGS, P = .26), and death‐censored kidney graft survival (dcKGS, P = .24) were similar between the sex‐matched and sex‐mismatched groups. Patient survival and dcPGS at 1, 5, and 15 years were 95.9%, 90.0%, and 62.1% and 86.1%, 77.1%, and 56.7% in the sex‐matched group and 93.6%, 86.2%, and 62.4% and 83.1%, 73.3%, and 54.3% in the sex‐mismatched group. Sex matching led to a lower odds of severe postoperative complications (41.2% vs 49.0%; OR 0.57, 95%CI 0.33‐0.97; P = .038); however, no increased odds of other adverse postoperative outcomes was detected.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates that sex matching reduced the odds of postoperative complications but did not impact other early and late outcome parameters in our cohort.

Impact of gender on echocardiographic characteristics in heart transplant recipients

AIMS

Assessment following heart transplantation (HTx) is routinely performed using transthoracic echocardiography. Differences in long-term mortality following HTx related to donor-recipient matching have been reported, but effects of gender on cardiac size and function are not well studied. The aims of this study were to evaluate differences in echocardiographic characteristics of HTx recipients defined by gender.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study prospectively enrolled 123 (n = 34 female) HTx recipients of which 23 recipients was donor-recipient gender mismatched. Patients were examined with 2-dimensional echocardiography using Philips iE33 ultrasound system. Data were analysed across strata based on recipient gender and gender mismatch. Male recipients had larger left ventricular (LV) mass, thicker septal wall (P<0·001) and larger absolute LV volumes (P<0·001). Mean LV ejection fraction (EF) was higher in females (P<0·05), but no differences in conventional parameters of right ventricular (RV) function were found. Ventricular strain was higher in females than in males: LV global longitudinal strain (P<0·01), RV global longitudinal strain (P<0·05) and RV lateral free wall (P<0·05). The male group receiving a female donor heart had comparable EF and strain parameters to the female group receiving a gender-matched heart.

CONCLUSION

We found that female recipient gender was associated with smaller chamber size, higher LV EF and better LV and RV longitudinal strain. Gender-mismatched male recipients appeared to exhibit function parameters similar to gender-matched female recipients. Our results indicate that the gender aspect, analogous to current reference guidelines in general population, should be taken into consideration when examining patients post-HTx.

Obesity class does not further stratify outcome in overweight and obese pediatric patients after heart transplantation

The effect of obesity stratification on pediatric heart transplant outcomes is unknown. The UNOS database was queried for patients ≥2-<18 years listed for heart transplant and stratified by BMI: normal (BMI>5%-≤85 percentile), overweight (BMI=86%-95 percentile), class 1 (BMI=100%-120% of 95 percentile), class 2 (BMI=121%-140% of 95 percentile), and class 3 obesity (BMI>140% of 95 percentile). A total of 5056 individuals were listed for transplant, with 71% normal, 13% overweight, 10% class 1, 4% class 2, and 2% class 3 obesity. Waitlist survival was not different between groups. Post-transplant survival was decreased in overweight and combined obese groups vs normal, with no further difference between overweight and obese classes. Overweight and obese patients had higher listing status and were more likely to have ventilator, inotrope, and mechanical circulatory support at listing. After transplant, there was an association of overweight-obese patients with diabetes and rejection requiring hospitalization. Stricter definition of normal weight reveals overweight-obese status was an independent risk factor for poorer post-transplant survival, without further effect by stratification of weight class. However, because there is no difference in waitlist survival, this study does not allow the selection of absolute weight-based criteria regarding transplant listing and suggests the need to look further for modifiable risk factors post-transplant.